Immediate-release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Research Articles

Continuous Manufacturing of Solvent-Free Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes for Enhanced Drug Solubility via Hot-Melt Extrusion: A Quality by Design Approach.

Conventional cyclodextrin complexation enhances the solubility of poorly soluble drugs but is solvent-intensive and environmentally unfavorable. This study evaluated solvent-free hot-melt extrusion (HME) for forming cyclodextrin inclusion complexes to improve the solubility and dissolution of ibuprofen (IBU). Molecular docking confirmed IBU's hosting in Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβ-CD), while phase solubility revealed its complex stoichiometry and stability. In addition, an 11 mm twin-screw co-rotating extruder with PVP VA-64 as an auxiliary substance aided the complex formation and extrusion. Using QbD and the Box-Behnken design, we studied variables (barrel temperature, screw speed, and polymer concentration) and their impact on solubility and dissolution. The high polymer concentration and high screw speeds positively affected the dependent variables. However, higher temperatures had a negative effect. The lowest barrel temperature set near the Tg of the polymer, when combined with high polymer concentrations, resulted in high torques in HME and halted the extrusion process. Therefore, the temperature and polymer concentration should be selected to provide sufficient melt viscosities to aid the complex formation and extrusion process. Studies such as DSC and XRD revealed the amorphous conversion of IBU, while the inclusion complex formation was demonstrated by ATR and NMR studies. The dissolution of ternary inclusion complexes (TIC) produced from HME was found to be ≥85% released within 30 min. This finding implied the high solubility of IBU, according to the US FDA 2018 guidance for highly soluble compounds containing immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. Overall, the studies revealed the effect of various process parameters on the formation of CD inclusion complexes via HME.

In Vitro Predictive Dissolution Test Should Be Developed and Recommended as a Bioequivalence Standard for the Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms of the Highly Variable Mycophenolate Mofetil.

The prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is presystemically hydrolyzed into the pharmacologically active compound mycophenolic acid (MPA), has been widely used for the prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. However, the huge variability in the plasma concentration level makes the development of MMF drug products difficult due to the great challenge of meeting the traditional bioequivalence (BE) limits. Numerous models have been developed in the past decade to explain the variability, with the emphasis on characterizing the enterohepatic circulation. While the variability arising from systemic appearance can also contribute to the remarkable MPA variability to a great extent, it has been ignored for long for this Biopharmaceutics Classification System class 2 drug. To improve the design of the BE study for this highly variable (HV) drug, the variability of MMF pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles focusing on the absorption process was explored in a population approach. A total of 81 Chinese adult liver transplant recipients were enrolled and had their plasma concentrations of MPA and its metabolites measured by HPLC during one visit or multiple visits in a long-term MMF regimen. The population models were developed using NONMEM, and the data and the results of the model were analyzed by R. Two population PK models of MMF focusing on the absorption process were developed based on the plasma concentrations of MPA and its major metabolite 7-O-MPA-β-glucuronide (MPAG). The MPA PK profiles were best characterized by a two-compartment disposition model with zero inter-individual variability (IIV) of elimination coefficient (K20), lag time, but considerable intra-individual variability (IAV) in the form of inter-occasion variability regarding systemic appearance coefficient, K20, and central volume of distribution, when just using MPA plasma concentrations as observations. The second model took into consideration the EHC by including MPAG profiles as well. The results from both models showcased that the IAV played a far more significant role than the IIV in accounting for the variability of the MMF systemic appearance. This is in line with what was found in the BE study: the within-subject variability (WSV) of BE measures largely exceeded the corresponding between-subject variability. The great WSV of MMF can be mechanistically explained by the interplay of dissolution and solubility with the gastrointestinal (GI) physiological dynamics, especially the gastric emptying (GE) in the fasting state regulated by migrating motor complex, and GE and pH variations in the fed state by the caloric content with irregular patterns of GI motility and secretion. The results implied that for the immediate-release solid oral dosage forms of MMF, running a regular in vitro dissolution test for the fasting state and developing a predictive in vitro dissolution test with sufficient simulation of the GE dynamics and proximal small intestinal pH fluctuations for the fed state would be excellent surrogates for the in vivo BE test. Furthermore, a physiologically based predictive in vitro dissolution test under both fasting and fed conditions would be a new trend for the BE studies of all other HV drug products.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Metformin Hydrochloride.

Data are examined regarding possible waiver of invivo bioequivalence testing (i.e. biowaiver) for approval of metformin hydrochloride (metformin) immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. Data include metformin's Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) properties, including potential excipient interactions. Metformin is a prototypical transporter-mediated drug and is highly soluble, but only 50% of an orally administered dose is absorbed from the gut. Therefore, metformin is a BCS Class III substance. A BCS-based approval approach for major changes to marketed products and new generics is admissible if test and reference dosage forms have the identical active pharmaceutical ingredient and if invitro dissolution from both are very rapid (i.e. at least 85% within 15 min at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8). Recent International Council for Harmonisation BCS guidance indicates all excipients for Class III biowaivers are recommended to be qualitatively the same and quantitatively similar (except for preservatives, flavor agents, colorant, or capsule shell or film coating excipients). However, despite metformin being a prototypical transporter-mediated drug, there is no evidence that commonly used excipients impact metformin absorption, such that this restriction on excipients for BCS III drugs merits regulatory relief. Commonly used excipients in usual amounts are not likely to impact metformin absorption.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride

In this monograph, literature data is reviewed to evaluate the feasibility of waiving in vivo bioequivalence testing and instead applying the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based methods to the approval of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing moxifloxacin hydrochloride as the sole active pharmaceutical ingredient. To facilitate the feasibility decision, solubility and permeability and dissolution characteristics in the context of the BCS, therapeutic index, therapeutic use, pharmacokinetic parameters, bioequivalence/bioavailability issues, drug-excipient interactions and other relevant data were taken into consideration. Moxifloxacin is a BCS class I drug with a wide therapeutic index. Bioequivalence risks arising from the presence of different excipients in the formulation and due to manufacturing variables were deemed to be low. The risks can be further reduced if the choice of excipients is limited to those present in products already approved in International Conference on Harmonisation or associated countries and if the results of in vitro dissolution studies comply with the specifications stipulated in the appropriate biowaiver guidelines. Under these conditions, we conclude that a BCS-based biowaiver can be recommended for moxifloxacin immediate-release solid oral dosage forms.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Folic Acid

This work presents a review of literature and experimental data relevant to the possibility of waiving pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies in human volunteers for approval of immediate-release solid oral pharmaceutical forms containing folic acid as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient. For dosage forms containing 5 mg folic acid, the highest dose strength on the World Health Organization Essential Medicines List, the dose/solubility ratio calculated from solubility studies was higher than 250 mL, corresponding to a classification as “not highly soluble.” Small, physiological doses of folic acid (≤320 μg) seem to be absorbed completely via active transport, but permeability data for higher doses of 1-5 mg are inconclusive. Following a conservative approach, folic acid is classified as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System class IV compound until more reliable data become available. Commensurate with its solubility characteristics, the results of dissolution studies indicated that none of the folic acid products evaluated showed rapid dissolution in media at pH 1.2 or 4.5. Therefore, according to the current criteria of the Biopharmaceutics Classification System, the biowaiver approval procedure cannot be recommended for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing folic acid.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Amoxicillin Trihydrate

Literature and experimental data relevant to waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing amoxicillin trihydrate are reviewed. Solubility and permeability characteristics according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), therapeutic uses, therapeutic index, excipient interactions, as well as dissolution and BE and bioavailability studies were taken into consideration. Solubility and permeability studies indicate that amoxicillin doses up to 875 mg belong to BCS class I, whereas 1000 mg belongs to BCS class II and doses of more than 1000 mg belong to BCS class IV. Considering all aspects, the biowaiver procedure can be recommended for solid oral products of amoxicillin trihydrate immediate-release preparations containing amoxicillin as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient at dose strengths of 875 mg or less, provided (a) only the excipients listed in this monograph are used, and only in their usual amounts, (b) the biowaiver study is performed according to the World Health Organization–, U.S. Food and Drug Administration–, or European Medicines Agency–recommended method using the innovator as the comparator, and (c) results comply with criteria for “very rapidly dissolving” or “similarly rapidly dissolving.” Products containing other excipients and those containing more than 875 mg amoxicillin per unit should be subjected to an in vivo BE study.

A Sensitive Medium-Throughput Method to Predict Intestinal Absorption in Humans Using Rat Intestinal Tissue Segments

A range of in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo approaches are currently used for drug development. Highly predictive human intestinal absorption models remain lagging behind the times because of numerous variables concerning permeability through gastrointestinal tract in humans. However, there is a clear need for a drug permeability model early in the drug development process that can balance the requirements for high throughput and effective predictive potential. The present study developed a medium throughput screening Snapwell (MTS-Snapwell) ex vivo model to provide an alternative method to classify drug permeability. Rat small intestine tissue segments were mounted in commercial Snapwell™ inserts. Unidirectional drug transport (A-B) was measured by collecting samples at different time points. Viability of intestinal tissue segments was measured by examining transepithelial electric resistance (TEER) and phenol red and caffeine transport. As a result, the apparent permeability (Papp; ×10(-6) cm/s) was determined for atenolol (10.7 ± 1.2), caffeine (17.6 ± 3.1), cimetidine (6.9 ± 0.1), metoprolol (12.6 ± 0.7), theophylline (15.3 ± 1.6) and, ranitidine (3.8 ± 0.4). All drugs were classified in high/low permeability according to Biopharmaceutics Classification System showing high correlation with human data (r = 0.89). These findings showed a high correlation with human data (r = 0.89), suggesting that this model has potential predictive capacity for paracellular and transcellular passively absorbed molecules.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Levetiracetam

Literature and experimental data relevant for the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing levetiracetam are reviewed. Data on solubility and permeability suggest that levetiracetam belongs to class I of the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS). Levetiracetam's therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index, and its favorable pharmacokinetic properties make levetiracetam a valid candidate for the BCS-based biowaiver approach. Further, no BE studies with levetiracetam IR formulations in which the test formulation failed to show BE with the comparator have been reported in the open literature. On the basis of the overall evidence, it appears unlikely that a BCS-based biowaiver approach for levetiracetam IR solid oral dosage forms formulated with established excipients would expose patients to undue risks. Thus, the BCS-based biowaiver approach procedure is recommended for IR solid oral dosage form containing levetiracetam, provided the excipients in the formulation are also present in products that have been approved in countries belonging to or associated with the International Committee on Harmonization and are used in their usual quantities, and provided the dissolution profiles of the test and reference product comply with the current requirements for BCS-based biowaivers.

In Vitro Dissolution of Generic Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Containing BCS Class I Drugs: Comparative Assessment of Metronidazole, Zidovudine, and Amoxicillin Versus Relevant Comparator Pharmaceutical Products in South Africa and India

Biowaivers are recommended for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms using dissolution testing as a surrogate for in vivo bioequivalence studies. Several guidance are currently available (the World Health Organization (WHO), the US FDA, and the EMEA) where the conditions are described. In this study, definitions, criteria, and methodologies according to the WHO have been applied. The dissolution performances of immediate-release metronidazole, zidovudine, and amoxicillin products purchased in South African and Indian markets were compared to the relevant comparator pharmaceutical product (CPP)/reference product. The dissolution performances were studied using US Pharmacopeia (USP) apparatus 2 (paddle) set at 75rpm in each of three dissolution media (pH1.2, 4.5, and 6.8). Concentrations of metronidazole, zidovudine, and amoxicillin in each dissolution media were determined by HPLC. Of the 11 metronidazole products tested, only 8 could be considered as very rapidly dissolving products as defined by the WHO, whereas 2 of those products could be considered as rapidly dissolving products but did not comply with the f 2 acceptance criteria in pH6.8. All 11 zidovudine products were very rapidly dissolving, whereas in the case of the 14 amoxicillin products tested, none of those products met any of the WHO criteria. This study indicates that not all generic products containing the same biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) I drug and in similar strength and dosage form are necessarily in vitro equivalent. Hence, there is a need for ongoing market surveillance to determine whether marketed generic products containing BCS I drugs meet the release requirements to confirm their in vitro bioequivalence to the respective reference product.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Bisoprolol Fumarate

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate-release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing bisoprolol as the sole active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. Bisoprolol is classified as a Class I API according to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). In addition to the BCS class, its therapeutic index, pharmacokinetic properties, data related to the possibility of excipient interactions, and reported BE/bioavailability problems are taken into consideration. Qualitative compositions of IR tablet dosage forms of bisoprolol with a marketing authorization (MA) in ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation) countries are tabulated. It was inferred that these tablets had been demonstrated to be bioequivalent to the innovator product. No reports of failure to meet BE standards have been made in the open literature. On the basis of all these pieces of evidence, a biowaiver can currently be recommended for bisoprolol fumarate IR dosage forms if (1) the test product contains only excipients that are well known, and used in normal amounts, for example, those tabulated for products with MA in ICH countries and (2) both the test and comparator dosage form are very rapidly dissolving, or, rapidly dissolving with similarity of the dissolution profiles demonstrated at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:378–391, 2014

Progressive Applications of Dissolution, Its Impact, and Implications in the Pharmaceutical World

Progressive Applications of Dissolution, Its Impact, and Implications in the Pharmaceutical World

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Zidovudine (Azidothymidine)

Literature data on the properties of zidovudine relevant to waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing requirements for the approval of immediate-release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing zidovudine alone or in combination with other active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are reviewed. Solubility, dissolution, and permeability data for zidovudine, along with its dosing schedule, therapeutic index and pharmacokinetic properties, and reports related to BE/bioavailability were all taken into consideration. Data for solubility and permeability suggest that zidovudine belongs to Class I according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System. Also, zidovudine is not a narrow therapeutic index drug. Although five out of 13 formulations tested in vivo (mostly of unreported composition) failed to show BE, it appears that in vitro studies performed according to biowaiver methods could predict in vivo behavior. Nevertheless, it is highly recommended that if a biowaiver is to be applied, excipient choices be limited to those found in IR drug products approved in International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) or associated countries in the same dosage form (Table 2 of this monograph), in their usual amounts. These conclusions apply to products containing zidovudine as the only API and also to fixed combination products containing zidovudine with respect to the zidovudine component of the formulation.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Efavirenz

Literature data pertaining to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence testing for the approval of immediate-release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing efavirenz as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. Because of lack of conclusive data about efavirenz's permeability and its failure to comply with the "high solubility" criteria according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), the API can be classified as BCS Class II/IV. In line with the solubility characteristics, the innovator product does not meet the dissolution criteria for a "rapidly dissolving product." Furthermore, product variations containing commonly used excipients or in the manufacturing process have been reported to impact the rate and extent of efavirenz absorption. Despite its wide therapeutic index, subtherapeutic levels of efavirenz can lead to treatment failure and also facilitate the emergence of efavirenz-resistant mutants. For all these reasons, a biowaiver for IR solid oral dosage forms containing efavirenz as the sole API is not scientifically justified for reformulated or multisource drug products.

A Dissolution Test for Finasteride in Immediate-Release Capsules

In vitro dissolution tests for solid oral dosage forms are extremely important to ensure the quality of these products. However, no dissolution test has been reported for finasteride (FNS) in immediate-release capsules. The aims of this work were to optimize a dissolution method for FNS capsules, validate the analytical method, and evaluate three different commercial products. The best in vitro dissolution profile was achieved using water as the dissolution medium with a basket stirrer at 100 rpm. The quantitative determination was performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at 210 nm. All validation parameters were satisfactory. The application of the method to commercial products showed the discriminatory power of the dissolution method. Because there is no monograph for FNS in capsules, this study illustrates the importance of an official dissolution test for FNS in capsules and the need to standardize the composition of the excipients contained in these commercial products. INTRODUCTION In vitro dissolution tests for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms, such as tablets and capsules, are extremely important because these tests are essential to evaluate the lot-to-lot quality of a drug product, to guide the development of new formulations, and to ensure continuing product quality and performance after certain changes (e.g., formulation, manufacturing process, site of manufacture, and scale-up of the manufacturing process) (1). For these reasons, progressively more emphasis has been placed on dissolution testing within the pharmaceutical industry and by regulatory authorities (2). Despite the importance of dissolution tests in ensuring the quality of medicines, several drug products that are widely commercialized throughout the world lack official dissolution tests. Finasteride (FNS) is a relevant example because no dissolution test is reported in the literature or in pharmacopeias for immediate-release capsules of this medication. FNS capsules are widely marketed and are prepared for medical reasons (e.g., avoiding an excipient to which a patient is allergic or obtaining a dosage level that is not marketed). FNS is N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-oxo-4-aza-5α-androst1-ene-17β-carboxamide (Figure 1), a specific competitive inhibitor of steroid type-II 5α-reductase, an intracellular enzyme that converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and is widely used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (3), prostate cancer (4), and androgenetic alopecia (5–8). A daily dose of 5 mg has been used for the treatment of BPH and prostate cancer, and a 1-mg dose has been used for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. FNS has a molecular formula of C23H36N2O2, a molecular weight of 372.6, and a log Po/w of 3.03. According to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), FNS is a Class 2 drug having low solubility and high permeability (9). Multiple analytical procedures have been reported for the analysis of FNS in pharmaceutical preparations when it is present as a single active ingredient or in combination dosage forms, using spectrophotometry (10–12), thin-layer chromatography (13, 14), infrared spectrophotometry (15), polarography (16), voltammetry (17), gas chromatography (18), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (19), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (20–23), and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) (24, 25). Because of the importance of in vitro dissolution tests for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms and the lack of a dissolution test for FNS compounded capsules, the aims of this work were to optimize a dissolution method *Corresponding author. e-mail: olimpia_martins@yahoo.com.br Figure 1. Chemical structure of finasteride. dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT200313P25

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Primaquine Phosphate

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate-release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing the antimalarial drug primaquine phosphate as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. On the basis of permeability data and solubility studies, primaquine phosphate was found to be "highly soluble" and "highly permeable" API, thus conforming to Class I of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS). It has a wide therapeutic index. BCS-conform dissolution studies showed the products to be rapidly dissolving. No data pertaining to BE or bioinequivalence of IR primaquine phosphate products could be located in open literature. On the basis of the available data, a biowaiver-procedure-based approval can be recommended for IR solid oral dosage forms of primaquine phosphate, provided the generic product contains excipients present in products already approved by the International Conference on Harmonisation or associated countries in similar amounts and the test and reference products meet the dissolution criteria for "rapidly dissolving" (>85% drug release in 30 min in standard media at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8; similarity factor (f(2)) > 50) or "very rapidly dissolving" products (>85% drug release in 15 min in standard media at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8).

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Stavudine

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate-release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing stavudine (d4T) are reviewed. According to Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), d4T can be assigned to BCS class I. No problems with BE of IR d4T formulations containing different excipients and produced by different manufacturing methods have been reported and, hence, the risk of bioinequivalence caused by these factors appears to be low. Furthermore, d4T has a wide therapeutic index. It is concluded that a biowaiver is appropriate for IR solid oral dosage forms containing d4T as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) provided that (a) the test product contains only excipients present in the IR d4T drug products that have been approved in a number of countries for the same dosage form, and (b) both test product and its comparator are either "very rapidly dissolving" or "rapidly dissolving" with similarity of dissolution profiles demonstrated at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8.

Development of a Discriminating In Vitro Dissolution Method for the Poorly Soluble Drug Rimonabant: Effect of Formulation Variables on Dosage Form Release Profiles

The effect of formulation parameters on the in vitro release profile of a poorly soluble drug was investigated using rimonabant as model drug. A dissolution test was developed to evaluate the release profile of rimonabant from both 20mg film-coated tablet and capsule dosage forms. The test was applied to compare dissolution profiles of different dosage forms and to evaluate the effect of formulation parameters on the in vitro release profile of the drug. Four different commercially available products were evaluated, and the results obtained show very distinct rates and extent of dissolution among them. The type of excipients used in the capsule formulation significantly influenced the dissolution rate of the formulations studied. INTRODUCTION Many drugs are poorly soluble or insoluble in water, which results in poor bioavailability because the solubility of a drug is an important factor in determining the rate and extent of its absorption (1). Drug release rate is one of the most important parameters for solid oral drug delivery systems; therefore, the therapeutic response is a function of the concentration of drug available to be absorbed and reach the bloodstream (2). Physical factors important to drug dissolution include particle size, molecular size, hydrophilicity, and crystalline structure. The volume of medium into which the drug must dissolve can also play a role in determining the dissolution rate (3). Physical modifications often aim to increase the surface area, solubility, and wettability of the powder particles and, therefore, typically focus on particle size reduction or generation of amorphous states. Classically, particle size reduction is performed by milling, and a wide variety of apparatus is available. The increase in bioavailability after micronization of drugs is well known, and the technique has been applied to a variety of poorly water-soluble compounds (4). Another approach for improving solubility is the complexation and incorporation of drugs into cyclodextrins (5). The incorporation of adjuvants (e.g., diluents, lubricants, and surfactants) into the formulation of a solid oral dosage form can cause significant effects on the dissolution rate of drugs, especially those that are hydrophobic and poorly soluble (6). In the case of Class 2 drugs in the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), dissolution may be the ratelimiting step for drug absorption, so suitable dissolution tests can be used to predict differences in bioavailability among different formulations (7). The choice of formulation is often of critical importance in establishing a successful product for oral administration of this class of drugs (8). In this context, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the dissolution profiles of several compounded formulations to that of a reference product using rimonabant as a model drug. This drug is poorly soluble in water and has high in vitro permeability; it is therefore classified as BCS Class 2 (9). To date, there is no published dissolution test for the evaluation of in vitro release profiles of this drug from immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. Therefore, we also developed a dissolution method for rimonabant to determine its release profiles from pharmaceutical formulations. We prepared several formulations containing different types and proportions of excipients and variations in drug particle size to assess the influence of formulation and drug physical properties on the dissolution kinetics of the drug MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals Rimonabant reference substance (99.5%) was purchased from Sequoia Research Products (Pangbourne, UK). Acomplia (Sanofi–Aventis, Paris, France) film-coated tablets and compounded capsules containing 20 mg of rimonabant were obtained from commercial sources. Gradient grade LiChrosolv acetonitrile and methanol were *Corresponding author. Current address: Departamento de Farmacia Industrial, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima 1000, 97105900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. e-mail: crolim@smail.ufsm.br dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT190312P30

Bioequivalence of Oral Products and the Biopharmaceutics Classification System: Science, Regulation, and Public Policy

The demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) is an essential requirement for ensuring that patients receive a product that performs as indicated by the label. The BE standard for a particular product is set by its innovator, and this standard must subsequently be matched by generic drug products. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) sets a scientific basis for an improved BE standard for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. In this paper, we discuss BE and the BCS, as well as the issues that are currently relevant to BE as a pharmaceutical product standard.

A Perspective for Biowaivers of Human Bioequivalence Studies on the Basis of the Combination of the Ratio of AUC to the Dose and the Biopharmaceutics Classification System

The ratio of AUC to the dose (AUC/dose) was previously found as a parameter that predicts a risk of bioinequivalence of oral drug products. On the basis of the combination of this parameter and the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS), a perspective for biowaivers of human bioequivalence studies is discussed. Databases of bioequivalence studies using immediate-release solid oral dosage forms were disclosed by 6 Japanese generic pharmaceutical companies, and the number of subjects required for demonstrating bioequivalence between generic and reference products was plotted as a function of AUC/dose for each BCS category. A small variation in the number of subjects was constantly observed in bioequivalence studies using dosage forms containing an identical BCS class 1 or class 3 drug, even though formulations of the generic product differ between companies. The variation was extremely enlarged when the drugs were substituted with BCS class 2 drugs. Rate-determining steps in oral absorption of highly water-soluble BCS class 1 and class 3 drugs are independent of formulations when there is no significant difference in the in vitro dissolution profiles between formulations. The small variation observed for both BCS categories indicates that the number of subjects converges into one value for each drug. Our analysis indicates the appropriateness of biowaiver of bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing not only BCS class 1 drugs but also class 3 drugs.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Levofloxacin

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing levofloxacin as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. According to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System, levofloxacin can be assigned to Class I. No problems with BE of IR levofloxacin formulations containing different excipients and produced by different manufacturing methods have been reported and hence the risk of bioinequivalence caused by these factors appears to be low. In addition, levofloxacin has a wide therapeutic index. On the basis of this evidence, a biowaiver is recommended for IR solid oral dosage forms containing levofloxacin as the single API provided that (a) the test product contains only excipients present in IR levofloxacin drug products that have been approved in International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) or associated countries and which have the same dosage form; (b) both the test and comparator dosage form are "very rapidly dissolving" or "rapidly dissolving" with similarity of the dissolution profiles demonstrated at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8; and (c) if the test product contains polysorbates, it should be both qualitatively and quantitatively identical to its comparator in terms of polysorbate content.