We evaluated the different Virtual Grid software ratios (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) on gridless clinical chest radiographs with visual grading analysis (VGA). In addition, we investigated the 2 image quality assessment algorithms (IQAAs). Gridless chest radiographs of 50 different intensive care unit patients were collected and afterward processed with Virtual Grid software. Different software (SW) grid ratios-6:1, 10:1, 13:1, 17:1, and 20:1-were applied to investigate the image quality (IQ) improvement. Image quality improvement was assessed by 4 radiologists in a relative VGA study where the reference image was processed with SW grid ratio of 10:1. One of the IQAAs used to analyze the radiographs was implemented in our department but was originally developed by the research group of the Duke University Medical Center. A general IQ score (IQS) was calculated based on contrast, detail, and noise. Another IQAA-NIQE (naturalness image quality evaluator)-available in Matlab (MATLAB Research R2019b; the MathWorks, Inc) was evaluated. Both methods were compared with VGA. Visual grading analysis scores of gridless radiographs are significantly lower ( P < 0.001). Image quality increases with increasing SW grid ratios, up to grid ratio of 17:1. However, some anatomical structures-spine and ribs-are negatively affected by the higher grid ratios. A correlation coefficient of 0.99 between the VGA and the IQS was observed. The correlation coefficient between VGA and NIQE was 1.00. Virtual Grid with SW grid ratio of 6:1 improves the IQ of gridless chest bedside radiographs. The grid ratios 17:1 and 20:1 should be considered carefully as the SW negatively affects parts of the ribs and spine. Therefore, grid ratios up to 13:1 can be advised. The IQAAs are promising and could be used to detect differences in IQ when different scatter correction SW settings are used.