Image-guided Corticosteroid Injections Research Articles

Ultrasound-Guided Iliopsoas Bursal Injections for Management of Iliopsoas Bursitis After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundIliopsoas tendonitis can cause persistent pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Nonoperative management of iliopsoas tendonitis includes anti-inflammatory drugs and image-guided corticosteroid injections. This study evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections (US-CSIs) for iliopsoas tendonitis following THA. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 42 patients who received an US-CSI for iliopsoas tendonitis after primary THA between 2009 and 2020 at a single institution. Outcomes including reoperation, groin pain at last follow-up, additional intrabursal injection, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year. Cross-table lateral radiographs (36 patients) or computed tomography scans (6 patients) were reviewed to determine if anterior cup overhang was present, indicating a mechanical etiology of iliopsoas tendonitis. Descriptive statistics and univariate comparison of HHS preinjection and postinjection were performed, with alpha < 0.05. ResultsAmong the 22 patients who did not have cup overhang, four (18.2%) had persistent groin pain at mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 14-94) after US-CSI. Three patients had a second injection; none had groin pain at most recent follow-up. No patients required acetabular revision. Mean HHS improved from 74 points (range, 52-94 points) to 91 points (range, 76-100 points; P < .001) at last follow-up. Among the 20 patients who had anterior cup overhang, five underwent acetabular revision after only temporary pain relief from injection. Groin pain was resolved in all revised patients at mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 12-60) after revision. Of the remaining 15 patients, five had persistent groin pain at mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 12-83). Mean HHS improved from 69 points (range, 50-96 points) preinjection to 81 (range, 56-98 points; P = .007) at last follow-up. ConclusionResolution of groin pain was demonstrated in 78.6% of patients in the cohort; however, those who did not have acetabular overhang had higher rates of success. The overall revision rate was 11.9%. US-CSI appears to be safe and effective in the diagnosis and treatment of iliopsoas tendonitis following primary THA. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Therapeutic Study.

Symptomatic COVID-19 infections in outpatient image-guided corticosteroid injection patients during the lockdown phase.

BackgroundMusculoskeletal pain is a debilitating problem treated with image-guided corticosteroid injections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple societies issued caution statements because of the unknown effect of corticosteroids on the patient’s immune system. The purpose is to determine if image-guided corticosteroid injections administered during the COVID-19 lockdown phase were associated with a higher infection rate compared to the general population.Materials and methodsIn a prospective study, patients undergoing image-guided corticosteroid injections for pain management during the lockdown phase between April 15 and May 22, 2020, were enrolled. One month after the injection, patients were surveyed by telephone for any COVID-19-related symptoms, and the electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed for symptoms and test results.ResultsSeventy-one subjects were recruited, 31 (44%) females, 40 (56%) males, ages 58 ± 17 (20–92) years. Follow-up was available in 66 (93%) of subjects, 60 (91%) by phone survey and EMR, 6 (9%) by EMR only, 45 ± 22 (19–83) days after injection. One (1/66, 1.52%; 95% CI 0.04–8.2%) 25-year-old male subject developed symptomatic infection 19 days after a tibiotalar injection. The prevalence of COVID-19 cases in the state of Massachusetts was 0.91% (62,726/6,892,503) during the study period. There was no significant difference in the rate of occurrence of new cases of COVID-19 infection between the corticosteroid injection group and the general population (p = 0.44).ConclusionImage-guided corticosteroid injections for pain management performed during the lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic were not associated with a higher infection rate compared to the general population.

Efficacy of a single, image-guided corticosteroid injection for glenohumeral arthritis

Limited data are available on the efficacy of cortisone injections for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). The amount and longevity of pain relief provided by a single cortisone injection are unclear. Additionally, it remains uncertain how the severity of radiographic GHOA and patient-reported function and pain levels impact the efficacy of an injection. Therefore, we sought to describe the relief provided by a single, image-guided glenohumeral injection in patients with GHOA. We hypothesized that patients with more severe radiographic GHOA and poorer baseline shoulder function would require earlier secondary intervention. Patients with symptomatic GHOA who elected to receive a corticosteroid injection for pain relief were prospectively enrolled. A phone interview was conducted to record the baseline Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scoreprior to the injection, as well as the OSS and VAS score at months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 after the injection. The endpoint of the study occurred when patients required a second injection, progressed to surgery, or reached month 12. Patients were grouped by their respective baseline OSS (mild vs. moderate or severe) and Samilson-Prieto radiographic classification (mild, moderate, or severe) for analysis. We analyzed 30 shoulders (29 patients). Of the patients, 52% were men. The average age was 66.1 years. No significant difference in overall survival (defined as no additional intervention) was seen between groups based on either the OSS or Samilson-Prieto grade. Additionally, the OSS and VAS scoreat each follow-up were compared with baseline values. For the entire cohort, a clinically significant difference was seen between baseline and months 1-4 for the OSS and between baseline and months 1-4, 6, 9, and 12 for the VAS score. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of corticosteroid injections for GHOA. There were no differences in the need for secondary interventionin this population based on the severity of either the OSS or the Samilson-Prieto radiographic classification. However, patients with more severe shoulder dysfunction based on the OSS did experience statistically significantly greater symptomatic relief than patients with milder dysfunction. Additionally, following a single injection, patients in this cohort experienced statistically and clinically relevant improvements in shoulder function and pain up to 4 months after injection.

The Effect of Image-Guided Corticosteroid Injections on Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

Background: Arthritis involving the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is common in the adult population. Initial treatment includes corticosteroid injections. Injections can be performed with image guidance to assist with placement; however, the clinical benefits are unclear. Methods: This retrospective study used Truven Health Marketscan Research Databases to identify patients from 2003 to 2014 with common International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for osteoarthritis of the CMC joint, Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for image and non-image-guided injections, and codes for surgical interventions. Length of time from injection until subsequent injection(s) and/or surgery was extrapolated for identified patients. Analysis of variance and binomial logistic regression were used to compare continuous variables and calculate odds ratios, respectively. Results: We identified 62 333 patients (68% women, 32% men), average age 59.7, with common ICD-9 diagnostic codes for CMC arthritis with respective injection CPT codes. The average number of days between the first and second injection for patients treated with non-guided injection was 237.3 versus 266.7 for image-guided injections. Of the 62333 patients, 8107 went on to operative treatment. Among operative patients, the average number of days to surgery following non-guided injection was 317.7 versus 333.7 days in the image-guided group. The average cost of performing non-image-guided injections was $203 less than using ultrasound. Conclusions: Image-guided thumb CMC injections do not result in significant increases in time between injections and do not lead to a meaningful delay to surgery. Future research needs to clarify the value of image-guided CMC injections in an increasingly economically conscientious health care environment.

Hip Injuries in Kicking Athletes

Groin pain is a common complaint in kicking athletes and must be recognized by the treating orthopaedic surgeon. A consensus statement during the Doha Agreement has defined 3 types of groin pain: defined clinical entities for groin pain, hip-related groin pain (femoroacetabular impingement, chondral, or labral tears) and other causes (such as anterior inferior iliac spine, ischial pathology). Clinical entities for groin pain are the most common, and strains/pain from the adductors, iliopsoas, and pubic areas are typically successfully treated with conservative treatment. Often, pain from inguinal-related groin pain requires surgical intervention from a general surgeon. Femoroacetabular impingement often coexists with a variety of other pathology and may result in labral tears and chondral damage. Open or arthroscopic osteoplasty is typically successful at alleviating symptoms and has high rates of return to sport. AIIS impingement from chronic hypertrophic overuse of the rectus femoris or trauma has recently been discovered as a cause of FAI that responds well to arthroscopic decompression and osteoplasty. Ischiofemoral impingement usually responds to conservative treatment with heel lifts, physical therapy and activity modification or image-guided corticosteroid injections into the quadratus femoris. The various causes of athletic groin pain if not recognized can cause significant disability and impair athletic performance. Further study is needed in this field to further clarify the relationship between clinical syndromes, determine optimal treatment/management algorithms and the most efficacious surgical techniques. The purpose of this article was to review the current evidence of hip injuries in kicking athletes.

Corticosteroid injection of the arthritic hip: what is the indication?

Forty-four patients who had image-guided corticosteroid injection of the hip were reviewed as part of a service improvement project to ascertain the medium term benefit of the procedure. Injections were indicated for treatment of hip pain or as part of a diagnostic work up to differentiate hip from back pain. At 42-month review, 39 patients fulfilled the criteria for the study. Of those having therapeutic injections, 70% had gone on to hip replacement, while only 20% of those having diagnostic injections had done so. These results suggest that, for patients who are fit for surgery, hip replacement should be the intervention of choice as corticosteroid injection does not substantially delay the need for surgery. Where there is doubt about the source of pain, there seems to be a clear role for diagnostic injection.

Glenohumeral Corticosteroid Injections in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Search and Review

To assess the literature on outcomes of corticosteroid injections for adhesive capsulitis, and, in particular, image-guided corticosteroid injections. TYPE: Systematic search and review. The databases used were PubMed (1966-present), EMBASE (1947-present), Web of Science (1900-present), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Upon reviewing full-text articles of these studies, a total of 25 studies were identified for inclusion. The final yield included 7 prospective studies, 16 randomized trials, and 2 retrospective studies. This systematic review was formatted by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study criteria were limited to clinical trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies that specifically evaluated intra-articular corticosteroid injections, both alone and in combination with other treatment modalities, for shoulder adhesive capsulitis. We included studies that were not randomized control trials because our review was not a meta-analysis. Data items extracted from each study included the following: study design, study population, mean patient age, duration of study, duration of symptoms, intervention, single or multiple injections, location of injections, control population, follow-up duration, and outcome measurements. A percentage change in outcome measurements was calculated when corresponding data were available. Risk of bias in individual studies was assessed when appropriate. All the studies involved at least 1 corticosteroid injection intended for placement in the glenohumeral joint, but only 8 studies used image guidance for all injections. Seven of these studies reported statistically significant improvements in range of motion at or before 12 weeks of follow-up. Ninety-two percent of all the studies documented a greater improvement in either visual analog pain scores or range of motion after corticosteroid injections in the first 1-6 weeks compared with the control or comparison group. Corticosteroid injections offer rapid pain relief in the short-term (particularly in the first 6 weeks) for adhesive capsulitis. Long-term outcomes seem to be similar to other treatments, including placebo. The added benefit of image-guided corticosteroid injections in improving shoulder outcomes needs further assessment.

Image-Guided Corticosteroid Injection of Calcific Tendonitis of Gluteus Maximus

Gluteus maximus tendonitis with its clinical and imaging patterns has been described in radiologic, orthopedic, and rheumatology texts and journals. Image-guided treatment, however, is not a familiar approach and has only been described in one case report in the English literature to the best of our knowledge. We present 4 patients with calcific tendonitis of the gluteus maximus who presented with excruciating pain in the posterior upper thigh with limitation of daily activities. The diagnosis was based on the characteristic radiologic appearances of calcifications in the tendon with cortical bone erosion and muscle edema. Treatment was with image-guided (fluoroscopy or computed tomography) injection of a local anesthetic and corticosteroid. All patients were pain-free on follow up.