INTRODUCTION: Isolated granulomatous inflammation of the appendix is a rare entity, identified histologically in < 2% of specimens, and typed into idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis (GA) and appendiceal Crohn’s disease (CD). Less than 10% of GA cases develop CD. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A healthy 26-year-old male was advised to seek care for computed tomography (CT) suggesting acute appendicitis, ordered to assess dysuria and right testicular and abdominal pain of 1-month duration. CT measured a dilated appendix extending to the seminal vesicle, with fecolith and fat stranding. Vitals were stable, abdomen benign, and labs normal. During appendectomy, an inflamed appendix was seen adherent to the bladder. An uneventful post-op period was followed by discharge home. Despite interval recovery, readmission for pain, vomiting, and diarrhea occurred on POD 10. Tachycardia was noted without fever. Abdomen was distended and generally tender. There was leukocytosis. CT found thickened jejunum with proximal dilation and air-fluid-levels. Jejunitis and obstruction resolved with conservative care, but evidence of GA (granuloma with giant cell, negative AFB and GMS stains) on recent pathology prompted testing for a broadened differential. There was denial of travel, ill contacts, personal and family history of CD, but admittance to colonoscopy a decade prior with findings of proctitis. Blood, urine, and stool cultures, as well as C. difficile and O&P were negative. CD, tuberculosis, fungal, and Coccidioides serologies were negative. Ileocolonoscopy found post-op cecal changes. Random ileocolonic biopsies resulted normal mucosa. With clinical stabilization, discharge home was planned. During follow-up visit, the patient declared return to normalcy, and thus declined investigations for CD. DISCUSSION: Causes of GA include infectious, systemic, and local reactions, but often remains elusive, as does a uniform approach to diagnosis and management. Omitted tests limit confidence in diagnosing idiopathic GA, and uncertainty in proper follow-up delays diagnosis of related conditions. Despite idiopathic labeling, we remain vigilant to alternate causes. The patient at first lacked acute infectious features, but as Yersenia is linked to ¼ of cases, serologic testing would be ideal to exclude infection and support idiopathic nature. Sub-acuity lends support to interval appendectomy as a cause. Lastly, a remote history of proctitis, in concert with enteritis on readmit, may hint at chronicity, and begs close follow-up for CD.Figure 1.: Histology showing presence of non-caseating granulomas in a background of lymphocytic inflammation in the appendiceal wall (x10).Figure 2.: Histology showing a giant cell in a granuloma in the appendiceal wall (x10).Figure 3.: Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast showing diffuse circumferential thickening of multiple distal jejunal loops.
Read full abstract