IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Spatial profiling of METex14-altered NSCLC under tepotinib treatment: Shifting the immunosuppressive landscape

MET inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring METex14 skipping alterations. Advancements in spatial profiling technologies have unveiled the complex dynamics of the tumor microenvironment (TME), a crucial factor in cancer progression and therapeutic response.This study uses spatial profiling to investigate the effects of the MET inhibitor tepotinib on the TME in a case of locally advanced NSCLC with a METex14 skipping alteration. A patient with resectable stage IIIB NSCLC, unresponsive to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, received tepotinib following the detection of a METex14 skipping alteration. Paired pre- and post-treatment biopsies were subjected to GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling using the Cancer Transcriptome Atlas and immune-related protein panels to evaluate shifts in the immune TME.Tepotinib administration allowed for a successful lobectomy and a pathological downstaging to stage IA1. The TME was transformed from an immunosuppressive to a more permissive state, with upregulation of antigen-presenting and pro-inflammatory immune cells. Moreover, a marked decrease in immune checkpoint molecules, including PD-L1, was noted. Spatial profiling identified discrete immune-enriched clusters, indicating the role of tepotinib in modulating immune cell trafficking and function. Tepotinib appears to remodel the immune TME in a patient with METex14 skipping NSCLC, possibly increasing responsiveness to immunotherapy.Our study supports the integration of genetic profiling into the management of early and locally advanced NSCLC to guide personalized, targeted interventions. These findings underscore the need to further evaluate combinations of MET inhibitors and immunotherapies.

Evaluation of Radiation Pneumonitis in a Phase II Study of Consolidation Immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LUN16-081

Purpose/Objective(s)The addition of immunotherapy (IO) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become common practice in eligible patients. Approaches to further improve outcomes and reduce treatment-related toxicity for these patients are needed. This study evaluates the risk of radiation pneumonitis after CCRT and its correlation with the radiation dose distribution, immunotherapy regimen (nivolumab vs nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and patient demographics across BTCRC-LUN16-081. Materials/MethodsPatients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after completion of CCRT were enrolled on BTCRC-LUN16-081, a randomized phase II trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of consolidative nivolumab versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab for six months. Radiation dose parameters, patient demographics, and toxicity events were evaluated among treatment arms for risk and severity of pneumonitis. ResultsOne-hundred and five patients were enrolled into two treatment arms, 54 patients received nivolumab alone and 51 patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Of these, 104 patients had dose volume histogram (DVH) information available. Within this cohort, 65 patients (62.5%) had stage IIIA and 39 patients (37.5%) had stage IIIB NSCLC disease per AJCC 7th edition. During the study, 29 patients (27.9%) were diagnosed with grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Utilizing logistic regression and evaluating different cut-offs for lung V20, patients with V20 >23% demonstrated significantly higher grade 2 or greater pneumonitis rates (37.1% vs. 16.2%, P = .031). No significant difference in rates of pneumonitis between arms were identified. Traditional lung DVH cut-offs (V5 of >65%, V20 of >35%, mean >20 Gy) were not associated with pneumonitis. ConclusionIn patients receiving nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab after definitive CCRT, lung V20 of >23% was associated with an increased risk of grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Radiation dose constraints for lungs in patients receiving consolidative IO after CCRT should continue to be evaluated and optimized when feasible.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-671): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

At the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-671 trial, adding perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved event-free survival in participants with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report overall survival and health-related quality of life outcomes from the second interim analysis. KEYNOTE-671 was a global phase 3 trial done at 189 medical centres. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to four cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or to four cycles of neoadjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks). Randomisation was done centrally using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by disease stage, PD-L1 expression, histology, and geographical region in blocks of four. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments; local pharmacists were unmasked to support treatment preparation. The dual primary endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03425643, and is ongoing but closed to enrolment. Between May 11, 2018, and Dec 15, 2021, 797 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=397) or the placebo group (n=400). Median study follow-up at the second interim analysis was 36·6 months (IQR 27·6-47·8). 36-month overall survival estimates were 71% (95% CI 66-76) in the pembrolizumab group and 64% (58-69) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·93]; one-sided p=0·0052; threshold, one-sided p=0·0054). Median event-free survival was 47·2 months (95% CI 32·9 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 18·3 months (14·8-22·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·59 [95% CI 0·48-0·72]). In the as-treated population, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 179 (45%) of 396 participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 151 (38%) of 399 participants in the placebo group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) participants in the placebo group. The significant overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone coupled with a manageable safety profile support the use of perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Corneal Transplant Rejection Following Durvalumab Therapy in a Patient With NSCLC: A Case Report.

We report the case of corneal transplant rejection in a 77-year-old male receiving durvalumab as consolidative therapy for stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Following successful chemoradiation and initiation of durvalumab, the patient underwent a right corneal transplant for corneal dystrophy. Six months after an initially stable post-transplant course, he developed progressive visual decline culminating in graft failure 1 year later despite treatment with prednisone eye drops. This case adds to the limited evidence implicating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in corneal graft rejection, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary evaluation and close monitoring of corneal transplant recipients undergoing ICI therapy.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes from the randomized, double-blind phase 3 KEYNOTE-671 study of perioperative pembrolizumab for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8012 Background: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + cisplatin-based chemotherapy (neoadj pembro + chemo), resection, and adjuvant (adj) pembro (pembro arm; n=397) significantly improved EFS, OS, pCR, and mPR and had an expected safety profile versus neoadj placebo (pbo) + chemo, resection, and adj pbo (pbo arm; n=400) in patients (pts) with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC. We present prespecified pt-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints from KEYNOTE-671. Methods: Pts completed EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires at baseline (BL), the last scheduled presurgery visit, adj cycles 1-4, 7, 10, and 13, and each post treatment visit. A constrained longitudinal data analysis model was used to estimate least squares mean (LSM) score changes from BL to neoadj wk 11 and adj wk 10 (latest time of ≥60% completion and ≥80% compliance) in QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL, physical functioning (PF), role functioning (RF), and dyspnea and QLC-LC13 cough and chest pain in all treated pts who completed ≥1 PRO assessment. Data are from interim analysis 2 (10 Jul 2023 cutoff). Results: Across arms, questionnaire completion was ≥87% at neoadj wk 11 and ≥62% at adj wk 10; compliance was ≥87% and ≥92%, respectively. There were no differences in LSM change from BL in the neoadj or adj phase for any PRO score (Table). Conclusions: Adding perioperative pembro maintained HRQoL in both the neoadj and adj settings versus neoadj chemo and surgery alone in pts with resectable early-stage NSCLC. Together with the significant efficacy improvements and absence of new safety signals, HRQoL data support the perioperative pembro regimen as a new standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT03425643 . [Table: see text]

Surgical outcomes for non-small cell lung carcinoma by race and surgical facility types in the United States.

11167 Background: Successful outcomes of surgical treatment of cancer requires expertise and high-quality supportive services for surgical care. Previous studies have shown that case volume and availability of other in-house supportive services affect surgical outcomes. Latest studies have shown that this gap has now significantly reduced. Issues related to access, availability of funding for latest technologies and continuous medical education still exist and likely still impact the surgical outcomes. The objective of the study is to understand the impact of surgical center related factors on survival outcomes for cancer patients based on race and other demographic features. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with Stage I-III Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2004 to 2020 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were divided into 4 cohorts of NCDB assigned facility type (Community Cancer Program, Comprehensive Community Cancer Program, Academic/Research Program, Integrated Network Cancer Program). Racial and other demographic data was analyzed for each of the facility types. Differences in categorical variables were evaluated using a Chi-square test. Results: 298,393 adenocarcinoma and 129,144 squamous cell carcinoma patients underwent surgery for NSCLC between 2004-2020. 326,798 patients with clinical stages I-III were selected for the analysis. Most surgeries were performed at the academic/research programs and comprehensive community programs. Utilization of each facility type was uniform across all races. The 30-day mortality rate was lowest for the academic/research programs (Community Cancer Program 3.1%, Comprehensive Community Cancer Program 2.6%, Academic/Research Program 1.8%, Integrated Network Cancer Program 2.3%; p=0.000). 30-day mortality rate was higher for American Indian, Aleutian, or Eskimo racial subgroups amongst all age-groups at all the surgical facility types especially for Stage IIIB NSCLC (White: 6%, Black: 3.4%, American Indian, Aleutian, or Eskimo: 14.3%, p=0.006). For each race, the 30-day mortality rate was better at the academic/research programs. Females had lower 30-day mortality for all racial subgroups. Having private insurance was associated with the lowest 30-day mortality rate. This was noted for all races across all the facility types. Lower income status was associated with higher mortality rates across all facility types. This difference was statistically significant for white patients. Majority of patients had less than 10 days of length of stay at all the surgical facility types. Conclusions: Outcomes of NSCLC surgery are significantly better at academic/research programs where a higher number of procedures are performed and access to latest surgical technologies is available. Short-term mortality rates are higher for American Indian, Aleutian, or Eskimo racial subgroup.

Cemiplimab (Libtayo)

CADTH recommends that Libtayo in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy be reimbursed by public drug plans for the first-line treatment of adults with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours have no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations and is locally advanced where patients are not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation, or for those with metastatic NSCLC, if certain conditions are met. Libtayo in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy should only be covered to treat adults who have stage IIIB or IIIC NSCLC and are not suitable for curative surgery or definitive chemoradiation or have stage IV NSCLC and have not received prior systemic treatment. Patients’ tumours should have no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 Patients should have a good performance status. Libtayo should only be reimbursed in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy if prescribed by clinicians with expertise and experience in treating NSCLC. The treatment should be delivered in outpatient specialized oncology clinics with expertise in systemic therapy delivery and management of immunotherapy-related side effects. The price of Libtayo should be negotiated so that its use in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy does not exceed the total drug cost of treatment with the least costly immunotherapy reimbursed in the first-line setting.

Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer

BackgroundStandard treatment with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with resectable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative treatment (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy) with nivolumab may further improve clinical outcomes.MethodsIn this phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned adults with resectable stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was event-free survival according to blinded independent review. Secondary outcomes were pathological complete response and major pathological response according to blinded independent review, overall survival, and safety.ResultsAt this prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.4 months), the percentage of patients with 18-month event-free survival was 70.2% in the nivolumab group and 50.0% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or recurrence, abandoned surgery, or death, 0.58; 97.36% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.81; P<0.001). A pathological complete response occurred in 25.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 4.7% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.40 to 12.97); a major pathological response occurred in 35.4% and 12.1%, respectively (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.48 to 6.49). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.5% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 25.2% of those in the chemotherapy group.ConclusionsPerioperative treatment with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer event-free survival than chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 77T ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04025879.)

Clinical outcomes associated with neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer in real-world practice.

In order to improve survival outcomes in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), strategies for neoadjuvant therapy need to be revisited. We evaluated and compared the efficacy of different neoadjuvant therapeutic modalities in a real-world setting. A total of 258 patients with clinical stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC was included. All the patients underwent surgical resection after one to four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment consisting of chemotherapy (83), immunotherapy (23), and immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (152). The radiologic response rate in the combined immunochemotherapy group was 67.8%, higher than that of 48.2% in the chemotherapy group and 4.3% in the immunotherapy group (p < 0.001). An improved major pathological response (MPR) was also achieved in the combined therapy group compared with the chemotherapy group and the immunotherapy group (53.9% vs. 10.8% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001). Patients in the combined therapy group had a significant trend toward longer disease-free survival than those in the chemotherapy alone group (3-year disease-free survival [DFS] of 68.79% vs. 50.81%; hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.477; p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox analysis identified radical surgery (HR, 0.328; p = 0.033), ypN0-1 stage (HR, 0.591; p = 0.038) and MPR result (HR, 0.362; p = 0.007) to be independent prognostic factors for DFS. Neoadjuvant treatment with a combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy appears to achieve higher radiological and pathological responses than monotherapy for IIA-IIIB NSCLC. Log-rank analysis showed that a better outcome could be expected in patients with the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy if compared with patients with chemotherapy alone in terms of DFS.

Real-World Neoadjuvant Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundNovel neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatments are being investigated for locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but real-world outcomes for neoadjuvant treatments are poorly understood. This study examined neoadjuvant treatment patterns, real-world event-free survival (rwEFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected, stage II-III NSCLC in the United States (US). MethodsThis retrospective study identified patients in the SEER–Medicare database (2007-2019) with newly diagnosed stage II, IIIA, and IIIB (N2) NSCLC (AJCC 8th edition) treated with neoadjuvant chemo/chemoradiotherapy and resection (index date: neoadjuvant therapy initiation). Neoadjuvant treatment regimens were described. rwEFS (time from index to first recurrence or death, whichever occurred first) and OS (time from index to death) were summarized by Kaplan–Meier analysis for overall population, by disease stage at diagnosis, and by neoadjuvant treatment modality. Results221 patients (stage II, N=70; stage III, N=151) met eligibility criteria. The median follow-up from index was 32.7 months. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (51%) or chemoradiotherapy (49%) prior to surgery; 97% of patients received platinum-based regimens, among which carboplatin+paclitaxel was the most frequent (45%). In all patients, median rwEFS was 17.6 months and 5-year rwEFS was 20.9%; median OS was 48.5 months and 5-year OS was 44.9%. 71% of patients had disease recurrence during follow-up; among them, 28% developed locoregional recurrence as the first recurrence event. ConclusionsPatients with resected, stage II-III NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemo/chemoradiotherapy have high rates of disease recurrence and poor survival outcomes, highlighting need for more effective treatments to improve survival rates.

Immunotherapy or Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Adults With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy combination treatment (ICI-chemotherapy) is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable oncogene alterations, but there are few data on ICI-chemotherapy for patients 75 years and older. To inform the choice of first-line drugs in clinical practice and assess the safety and efficacy of ICI-chemotherapy combination treatment in older adult patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. This retrospective cohort study included 58 centers in Japan. The cohort consisted of patients 75 years and older with clinical stage IIIB, IIIC, IV, postoperative or radiotherapy recurrent NSCLC. Patients started first-line systemic therapy between December 2018 and March 2021. Those receiving first-line molecular targeted drugs were excluded. The data were analyzed from February 2022 to October 2022. Systemic therapy. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. A total of 1245 patients (median [range] age, 78 [75-95] years; 967 [78%] male) with NSCLC were included in the cohort. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression of less than 1% occurred in 268 tumors (22%); 1% to 49% in 387 tumors (31%); 50% and higher in 410 tumors (33%), and unknown expression in 180 tumors (14%). Median OS was 20.0 (95% CI, 17.1-23.6) months for the 354 patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy (28%); 19.8 (95% CI, 16.5-23.8) months for the 425 patients receiving ICI alone (34%); 12.8 (95% CI, 10.7-15.6) months for the 311 patients receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy (25%); and 9.5 (95% CI, 7.4-13.4) months for the 155 patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy (12%). After propensity score matching, no differences in OS and PFS were found between the patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy vs ICI alone. Each group consisted of 118 patients. For PD-L1 expression of 1% and higher the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.67-1.42; P = .90), and the PFS HR was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.67-1.25; P = .59). Significance was also not reached when separately analyzed for lower or higher PD-L1 expression (1%-49% or ≥50%). However, grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 86 patients (24.3%) treated with ICI-chemotherapy and 76 (17.9%) with ICI alone (P = .03). In this study, ICI-chemotherapy combination treatment did not improve survival and increased the incidence of grade 3 and higher immune-related adverse events compared with ICI alone in patients 75 years and older. Based on these results, ICI alone may be recommended for older adult patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC.

Predicting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) metabolic parameters in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 and glucose transporter 1 expression are closely associated, and studies demonstrate correlation of PD-L1 with glucose metabolism.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate the association of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) metabolic parameters with PD-L1 expression in primary lung tumour and lymph node metastases in resected NSCLC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 210 patients with node-positive resectable stage IIB–IIIB NSCLC. PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) was determined using the DAKO 22C3 immunohistochemical assay. Semi-automated techniques were used to analyse pre-operative [18F]FDG-PET/CT images to determine primary and nodal metabolic parameter scores (including max, mean, peak and peak adjusted for lean body mass standardised uptake values (SUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesional glycolysis (TLG) and SUV heterogeneity index (HISUV)).ResultsPatients were predominantly male (57%), median age 70 years with non-squamous NSCLC (68%). A majority had negative primary tumour PD-L1 (TPS < 1%; 53%). Mean SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SULpeak values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in those with TPS ≥ 1% in primary tumour (n = 210) or lymph nodes (n = 91). However, ROC analysis demonstrated only moderate separability at the 1% PD-L1 TPS threshold (AUCs 0.58–0.73). There was no association of MTV, TLG and HISUV with PD-L1 TPS.ConclusionThis study demonstrated the association of SUV-based [18F]FDG-PET/CT metabolic parameters with PD-L1 expression in primary tumour or lymph node metastasis in resectable NSCLC, but with poor sensitivity and specificity for predicting PD-L1 positivity ≥ 1%.Clinical relevance statementWhilst SUV-based fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography metabolic parameters may not predict programmed death-ligand 1 positivity ≥ 1% in the primary tumour and lymph nodes of resectable non-small cell lung cancer independently, there is a clear association which warrants further investigation in prospective studies.Trial registrationNon-applicableKey Points• Programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry has a predictive role in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy; however, it is both heterogenous and dynamic.• SUV-based fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) metabolic parameters were significantly higher in primary tumour or lymph node metastases with positive programmed death-ligand 1 expression.• These SUV-based parameters could potentially play an additive role along with other multi-modal biomarkers in selecting patients within a predictive nomogram.

Deep pathomics: A new image-based tool for predicting response to treatment in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Despite the advantages offered by personalized treatments, there is presently no way to predict response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this exploratory study, we investigated the application of deep learning techniques to histological tissue slides (deep pathomics), with the aim of predicting the response to therapy in stage III NSCLC. We evaluated 35 digitalized tissue slides (biopsies or surgical specimens) obtained from patients with stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC. Patients were classified as responders (12/35, 34.7%) or non-responders (23/35, 65.7%) based on the target volume reduction shown on weekly CT scans performed during chemoradiation treatment. Digital tissue slides were tested by five pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-AlexNet, VGG, MobileNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet-using a leave-two patient-out cross validation approach, and we evaluated the networks' performances. GoogLeNet was globally found to be the best CNN, correctly classifying 8/12 responders and 10/11 non-responders. Moreover, Deep-Pathomics was found to be highly specific (TNr: 90.1) and quite sensitive (TPr: 0.75). Our data showed that AI could surpass the capabilities of all presently available diagnostic systems, supplying additional information beyond that currently obtainable in clinical practice. The ability to predict a patient's response to treatment could guide the development of new and more effective therapeutic AI-based approaches and could therefore be considered an effective and innovative step forward in personalised medicine.

TARGET: A Phase II, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of 5-Year Adjuvant Osimertinib in Completely Resected EGFR-Mutated Stage II to IIIB NSCLC Post Complete Surgical Resection

IntroductionOsimertinib is a central nervous system (CNS)-active, third generation, irreversible, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, with demonstrated efficacy in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present the rationale and design for TARGET (NCT05526755), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 years of adjuvant osimertinib in patients with completely resected EGFRm stage II to IIIB NSCLC. Materials and MethodsTARGET is a phase II, multinational, open-label, single-arm study. Adults aged ≥18 years (Taiwan ≥20 years), with resected stage II to IIIB NSCLC are eligible; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed. Eligible patients must have locally confirmed common (exon 19 deletion or L858R) or uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and/or S768I) EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations, alone or in combination. Patients will receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily for 5 years or until disease recurrence, discontinuation or death. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort). Secondary endpoints include: investigator-assessed DFS at 3 and 4 years; overall survival at 3, 4, and 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort); DFS at 3, 4, and 5 years (uncommon EGFR mutations cohort); safety and tolerability, type of recurrence and CNS metastases (both cohorts). Exploratory endpoints include: tissue/plasma concordance; analysis of circulating molecules in plasma samples using different profiling approaches to detect minimal residual disease; incidence and change over time of incidental pulmonary nodules. ResultsTARGET is currently recruiting, and completion is expected in 2029.

Traitement standard des stades III non résécables: Standard therapy for unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Approximately 25% of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) present with a locally advanced disease. Stage III NSCLC includes heterogeneous diseases in term of initial clinical presentation and therapeutic strategy. An optimal initial staging integrating a PET/CT, EBUS mediastinal nodes exploration and an injected brain imaging is necessary. Pulmonary function test is to be systematically realized. The therapeutic strategy is decided in a multidisciplinary tumor board by an experimented team. Most of the stage IIIB and IIIC NSCLC receive a radio-chemotherapy. A concurrent plan is to be favored to a sequential plan. Platinum doublets comprise most standard chemotherapy regimens and must be started as early as possible. For fail or elderly patients who could not benefit from a concurrent chemotherapy, a sequential normo-fractionnated radiotherapy, or even a single chemotherapy are possible alternatives. After radio-chemotherapy, a consolidation systemic treatment by durvalumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, is currently a standard of care, in patients with a PD-L1 expressing tumor, based on the PACIFIC trial overall survival results.1877-1203/© 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Randomized, open-label phase II study of brigatinib and carboplatin plus pemetrexed and brigatinib alone for chemotherapy-naive patients with ALK-rearranged non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: treatment rationale and protocol design of the B-DASH study (WJOG 14720 L)

BackgroundThe ALTA-1L study compared brigatinib with crizotinib in untreated ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, demonstrating the efficacy of brigatinib. Although the median progression-free survival (PFS) of brigatinib group was 24.0 months, the one-year PFS rate was 70%. In the NEJ009 study, patients with EGFR mutations showed improved outcomes with gefitinib plus chemotherapy compared with gefitinib monotherapy. To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of brigatinib with chemotherapy for patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, we designed B-DASH study (WJOG 14720L).MethodsB-DASH study is a multicenter, two-arm, phase II study. Eligible patients have untreated stage IIIB, stage IIIC, stage IV, or postoperative relapse ALK-rearranged nonsquamous NSCLC. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive brigatinib (180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg) monotherapy or carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 on day 1) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 on day 1) and brigatinib in a 3-week cycle for up to four cycles, followed by pemetrexed and brigatinib as maintenance therapy. The target hazard ratio of 0.62 is set based on the NEJ009 study. With one-sided alpha = 0.20 and power = 0.8, the sample size for the B-DASH study was calculated to be 110, considering the possibility of patients dropping out. The primary endpoint is PFS. The key secondary endpoints are the overall response rate and overall survival. We will evaluate tumor-derived DNA from plasma specimens before treatment, 42 days after administering the study drug, and on the day of progressive disease. Recruitment began in November 2021 and is ongoing.DiscussionThe efficacy of combination therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy was demonstrated in patients with EGFR mutations but remains unclear in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. The B-DASH study is the only trial of brigatinib combined with chemotherapy in patients with untreated ALK-rearranged NSCLC.Trial registrationjRCT identifier: jRCTs041210103.

Efficacy and surgical safety of sequential surgical resection after pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for initial unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionNeoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is effective in resectable NSCLC. However, its role in unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgical resection to treat initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients. MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 59 initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients who received induction pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy between June 2019 and April 2022. Clinical characteristics, radiological and pathological responses, and survival outcomes were collected and evaluated. ResultsFifity-nine initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients were identified and divided into surgery (n = 23) and non-surgery (n = 36) groups with a median follow-up time of 15.0 months. The median PFS/DFS of the surgery group was significantly longer than the non-surgery group (not reached vs. 15.5 months, p = 0.0031). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the OS rate was 100% (23/23) in the surgery group and 83.3% (30/36) in the non-surgery group. The pathological analysis suggested that 13 of 23 patients (56.5%) achieved major pathological response (MPR) or pathological complete response (pCR), and more squamous cell carcinoma cases were observed in the MPR group compared to the non-MPR group (p = 0.034). All patients in the surgery group had an R0 resection, and no surgical-related mortality was recorded; only three patients (13.0%) experienced any postoperative complications. ConclusionIn this retrospective study, surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was promising for initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients, with a high MPR rate and good surgical safety.

Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone for Chinese Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The benefit of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for resectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. To assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC. In this randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted at 2 hospitals in China, patients aged 18 to 70 years with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC were enrolled between April 7, 2020, and January 12, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of camrelizumab (200 mg) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, 130 mg/m2, and platinum [cisplatin, 75 mg/m2; carboplatin, area under the curve, 5; or nedaplatin, 100 mg/m2]) or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery after 4 to 6 weeks. The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary end points included the major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety. Disease-free survival (DFS, defined as the time from surgery to disease recurrence or death from any cause) was analyzed post hoc. Efficacy was assessed on a modified intention-to-treat basis. Ninety-four Chinese patients were randomized, and 88 (93.6%; median age, 61 years [IQR, 54-65 years]; 74 men [84.1%]) received allocated neoadjuvant treatment (43 received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, and 45 received chemotherapy alone). Among these 88 patients, the pCR rate was 32.6% (14 of 43; 95% CI, 19.1%-48.5%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs 8.9% (4 of 45; 95% CI, 2.5%-21.2%) with chemotherapy alone (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.35-22.37; P = .008). The MPR rates were 65.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-79.0%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 15.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-29.5%) with chemotherapy alone. The radiographic ORRs were 72.1% (95% CI, 56.3%-84.7%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 53.3% (95% CI, 37.9%-68.3%) with chemotherapy alone. With a median follow-up of 14.1 months (IQR, 9.2-20.9 months), the median EFS and DFS were not reached in either group. The most common neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were decreased white blood cell count (6 of 43 [14.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 2 of 45 [4.4%] in the chemotherapy group) and decreased neutrophil count (3 of 43 [7.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 5 of 45 [11.1%] in the chemotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths were reported. This randomized clinical trial found that among patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, significantly improved the pCR rate with manageable toxic effects. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04338620.

Safety and efficacy of two-drug combination in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and validation of the Charlson Index as a predictor of survival.

The best platinum-based chemotherapy regimen remains to be determined in elderly patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Predictive indexes for toxicity and survival are also needed to give the safest and most effective treatment for this population. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC NSCLC over 70 years of age, treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were included. Patients from two cancer centers treated between 12/2006 and 08/2019 were included in the data analysis. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 76.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 71.6-83.4]. Thirty-nine patients were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy and 19 with a sequential strategy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted in a combination of platinum and taxanes. At a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 7-69), the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.5% and 66.9%, respectively. Male sex and a high Charlson index were identified as independent prognostic factors for worse OS. Acute grade 3-5 toxicities occurred in 34.4% of patients, including 1 grade 5 toxicity, and grade 3-4 late toxicities occurred in 17.2% of patients. In the whole cohort a high Charlson index was the only predictive factor for a higher risk of grade 3-5 acute toxicities (statistical trend in the concurrent cohort, P=0.06). The Charlson index correlated with toxicity and survival in elderly patients treated with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC. The addition of taxanes to platinum chemotherapy was safe in the present study and warrants further exploration.

Perioperative Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundApproximately 20% of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive a diagnosis of stage III disease. There is no current consensus regarding the most appropriate treatment for these patients.MethodsIn this open-label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (experimental group) or chemotherapy alone (control group), followed by surgery. Patients in the experimental group who had R0 resections received adjuvant treatment with nivolumab for 6 months. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival at 24 months and safety.ResultsA total of 86 patients underwent randomization; 57 were assigned to the experimental group and 29 were assigned to the control group. A pathological complete response occurred in 37% of the patients in the experimental group and in 7% in the control group (relative risk, 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 21.23; P=0.02). Surgery was performed in 93% of the patients in the experimental group and in 69% in the control group (relative risk, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.74). Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival at 24 months were 67.2% in the experimental group and 40.9% in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.88). Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival at 24 months were 85.0% in the experimental group and 63.6% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 11 patients in the experimental group (19%; some patients had events of both grades) and 3 patients in the control group (10%).ConclusionsIn patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, perioperative treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response and longer survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADIM II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03838159; EudraCT number, 2018-004515-45.)