IbsC is a small toxin protein in Escherichia coli, whose expression is repressed by a cis-acting small noncoding RNA, SibC (renamed from RygC or QUAD1c). Overexpression of IbsC or the absence of SibC transcription induces the expression of both psp operon (pspABCDE) and pspG gene encoding phage shock proteins, whose expression were known to be induced by multiple environment stresses or agents such as filamentous phage infection, osmotic shock, continued incubation in stationary phase, heat shock, and ethanol treatment. Although exogenous overexpression of IbsC leads to cell death, physiological roles of IbsC remain unknown especially because the strain without ibsC gene in the chromosome shows no growth defects. Considering that only Psp proteins are induced by expression of IbsC, not by other similar small toxin proteins such as LdrD, ShoB, and TisB, the role of IbsC might specifically be related to phage shock proteins. The psp operon is transcribed from pspA promoter by RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the alternative stress-responsive sigma factor 54 (σ). Transcription from pspA promoter requires PspF as an activator protein that binds to the upstream region of the core promoter elements. Furthermore, PspA inhibits the σ-dependent pspA transcription by interacting with PspF and exerting its negative effects on transcription activation by PspF. Since the IbsC expression causes the induction of pspA transcription, it is attempting to see how the signal of IbsC gets transduced into the transcription activation. The mechanism involved in linking IbsC to pspA transcription is essential for understanding not only the physiological functions of IbsC, but also the regulation mechanism of transcription from σdependent promoters in response to environmental stresses. To understand the molecular mechanism of the pspA induction by IbsC, it is necessary to know which factors are involved in the activation of pspA transcription under conditions of IbsC expression. Although an in vitro transcription system for pspA promoter analysis was previously set up, it is difficult to identify in vitro transcripts because their transcription termination sites are unclear. To overcome the drawback of the previous in vitro transcription system, in this study, we constructed plasmid pPR56 containing a transcription fusion of pspA promoter and rnpB terminator by replacing the rnpB promoter-containing DNA fragment of pLMd23-wt with the pspA promoter-containing fragment. The pspA promoter-containing fragment spanning from −320 through +56 of pspA, which also includes two UAS sequences (UAS I and UAS II) as PspF-binding sites and the IHF binding site, was subcloned into the BamHI/ EcoRI linearlized pLMd23-wt not having the rnpB promotercontaining DNA fragment, to generate the fusion plasmid pPR56 (Fig. 1). The rnpB terminator region in the fusion construct contained the rnpB sequence from +331 to +1286, which includes the three rnpB terminators T1, T2, and T3 leading to transcription termination at +413, +526, and +638, respectively. Therefore, this pPR56 construct was designed to generate pspA-rnpB fusion transcripts of 146 nt terminating at T1 (pspAT1), 259 nt at T2 (pspAT2), and 371 nt at T3 (pspAT3) if transcription starts at the transcription initiation site of pspA. Using supercoiled plasmid pPR56 DNA as a template, in vitro transcription was carried out by adding Eσ and PspF. The pspAT1 transcript of 145 nt was produced as a major band although minor pspAT2 and pspAT3 products were also observed (Fig. 2). The increased abundance of three transcripts was observed with the incremental amount of PspF protein, while RNA I of 108 nt (a transcript transcribed from its own σ specific promoter of the plasmid DNA) was not produced. In contrast, the same transcription reaction performed with Eσ did not produce the pspAT transcripts. Instead, this reaction generated RNA I. All our data confirmed that the pspA transcripts were produced from the σ-specific pspA promoter of pPR56. To
Read full abstract