A brief review is given of the author’ s personal impressions of the development of aeroelasticity during the sixth to ninth decades of e ight. It is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather a brief look at the e eld as the author saw it, from his own personal viewpoint as a worker in this area. It is limited to aircraft problems and does not embrace the parallel and large e eld of aeroelastic problems in helicopters. The e eld of aeroelasticity encompasses the interaction of aerodynamic, elastic, and inertia forces acting on a e ight vehicle. This was evident in the early days of e ight, even at low speeds, because aircraft structures were relatively e exible. As aircraft speeds increased and knowledge of aeroelasticity became more widespread, aircraft structures were made stiffer and were better designed to avoid these aeroelastic interaction problems. During World War II, with the advent of high speeds and slender-wing aircraft, a number of signie cant aeroelastic problems began to appear, ranging from loss of aileron power and control reversal, to wing and control surface e utter. The postwar period, with the emergence of highspeed jet transports with swept wings and engine nacelles, led to careful studies of the effects of aeroelasticity in the initial design of these aircraft. The basic approach to aeroelastic effects became centered around four general areas: 1) the development of effective analytic and numerical studies for e utter and aeroelasticity, 2) wind-tunnel testing of dynamically scaled wind tunnel models, 3) ground vibration tests to check the natural frequencies and stiffness properties of the actual aircraft, and 4) careful techniques for e ight testing the actual aircraft. By the mid-1950s, aeroelasticity had become recognized as an important part of the aircraft design process. An excellent historical review of developments in aeroelasticity up to this period, may be found by Garrick and Reed. 1 A seminal paper that marked the emergence of the e eld was given by Collar 2 in 1946. Another notable review emphasizing the British efforts in aeroelasticity up to this period was also given by Collar. 3