Anti-transglutaminase IgA Antibodies Research Articles

Clinical Spectrum of Celiac Disease among Adult Population: Experience from Largest Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.

Celiac disease (CD) is a systemic autoimmune enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. Celiac disease affects 0.6-1.0% of the population worldwide. The prevalence of CD in Pakistan is yet unknown due to under diagnosis and lack of awareness. To determine a vast variety of presenting features in subtypes of CD to overcome the burden of disease. This was a prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study conducted at Gastroenterology department of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi from December 2022 till June 2023. This study included all adult patients ≥18 years diagnosed with CD on the basis of clinical presentation, positive IgA and IgG anti-transglutaminase antibodies (value >12 IU/mL detected by ELISA followed by small intestinal biopsy classified as per Marsh criteria. The data obtained were analyzed on the statistical software SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics were obtained by frequencies and percentages. About 142 patients were enrolled in the study, 103 (91.5%) had classical CD (CCD) whereas 36 (25%) had non-classical (NCCD). About 89 (62.7%) were females and 53 (37.3%) were males. The mean age was found to be 23 ± 6 years. Nutritional deficiencies including anemia, B12, folate, osteopenia and low body mass index (BMI) <18 was found more in CCD group as compared with NCCD group with significant p-values. Titers of anti-TTG between CCD and NCCD were not statistically significant. Hypothyroidism and PCOS were the most common associated conditions observed in adult CD patients. In conclusion, CD in adults and has diverse presentations. Adults with unexplained extra-intestinal symptoms like anemia and bone pain should be investigated for CD. Butt N, Shahid B, Butt S, et al. Clinical Spectrum of Celiac Disease among Adult Population: Experience from Largest Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):24-29.

Diagnostic accuracy of a novel point-of-care test for simultaneous detection of anti-transglutaminase IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin IgG antibodies.

Point-of-care tests (POCTs) may have a role in detecting undiagnosed cases of Celiac disease (CD). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel POCT, compared with the conventional serological methods, for simultaneous anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin (DGP) IgG antibody detection. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of different biological matrices (whole blood and serum) on test performance. Serum and whole blood from celiac or suspected celiac patients who underwent duodenal biopsy were assayed for the presence of anti-tTG IgA and anti-DGP IgG both with the reference standard methods (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) and with the POCT (PRIMA Lab SA, Balerna, Switzerland). 266 sera (101 negative and 165 positive) and 60 whole blood samples (34 positive and 26 negative) were included in the study. POCT for anti-DGP IgG showed a sensitivity of 84.3% and a specificity of 90.1%, with positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of 91.07% and 82.73%. POCT for anti-tTG IgA showed a sensitivity of 98.31% and a specificity of 98.02%, with a PPV and NPV of 98.31% and 98.02%. Test accuracies were 86.94% and 98.17%, respectively. The agreement of the results between the two different matrices showed a strong correlation rate: 95% for anti-DGP IgG and 100% for anti-tTG IgA. The anti-tTG IgA/anti-DGP IgG-based POCT showed good diagnostic accuracy with comparable sensitivities and specificities to reference standard methods in detecting CD in symptomatic patients and could be considered as a mass screening test before referring to conventional serology.

The Role of IgA and IgG anti-transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of celiac disease in children

Aims: Diagnosing celiac disease in children presents various challenges for pediatricians in the various clinical stages. Thus, the diagnosis of cases increased significantly, although children did not always present symptoms or clinical signs of the disease. In support of the diagnosis, several factors come into play: screening, serological tests, awareness of the presence of celiac disease and the factors that favor its occurrence. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective study at the Pediatric Clinical Hospital "St. Ioan " Galati between January 1, 2014 and October 2022. In this study we included 2640 children with suggestive symptoms of celiac disease. Results: A number of 102 patients were diagnosed with celiac disease, recurrent abdominal pain being the most common symptom.

Hip Fracture Due to Osteomalacia Secondary to Celiac Disease

Background: Hip fracture is uncommon among younger patients but can have devastating consequences. Therefore, hip fracture caused by minimal trauma requires examinations on calcium metabolism to identify the primary cause. Methods: We present a clinical case of an 18-year-old male patient who suffered a subcapital fracture of the left hip due to minimal trauma while playing soccer. The patient immediately underwent surgery, which is closed reduction and internal fixation with two cancellous screws installed. Subsequently, metabolic tests showed severe vitamin D deficiency (27.1 nmol/L - normal above 75 nmol/L) and high levels of IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies (2502.40 U/mL). Digestive biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of celiac disease, and he was treated with a gluten-free diet and calcium and vitamin D supplements. Results: After two years of follow-up, the patient is pain-free, with full hip mobility. There were no complications (osteosynthesis failure, avascular necrosis or pseudarthrosis) and serum levels of vitamin D, and IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies had normalized. Conclusion: In young patients presenting with low energy trauma fractures, vitamin D deficiency should be considered as a possible etiology, and the reason for such osteomalacia, such as celiac disease, should be identified.

Coeliac Disease Case–Control Study: Has the Time Come to Explore beyond Patients at Risk?

The worldwide prevalence of asymptomatic coeliac disease (CD) is increasing, which is in part due to the routine screening of children with risk factors. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with CD are at risk of long-term complications. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic children at the time of CD diagnosis. A case-control study was conducted using data from a cohort of 4838 CD patients recruited from 73 centers across Spain between 2011 and 2017. A total of 468 asymptomatic patients (cases) were selected and matched by age and sex with 468 symptomatic patients (controls). Clinical data, including any reported symptoms, as well as serologic, genetic, and histopathologic data were collected. No significant differences were found between the two groups in most clinical variables, nor in the degree of intestinal lesion. However, the asymptomatic patients were taller (height z-score -0.12 (1.06) vs. -0.45 (1.19), p < 0.001) and were less likely to have anti transglutaminase IgA antibodies ≥ 10 times the upper normal limit (66.2% vs. 758.4%, p = 0.002). Among the 37.1% of asymptomatic patients who were not screened for CD due to the absence of risk factors, only 34% were truly asymptomatic, while the remaining 66% reported non-specific CD-related symptoms. Therefore, expanding CD screening to any child who undergoes a blood test could reduce the burden of care for some children, as many of those considered asymptomatic reported non-specific CD-related symptoms.

Celiac disease in children (Clinical Case)

11-year-old female child. Sent to the Nutrition Consultation due to suspicion of celiac disease and to start a gluten-free diet, after analytical values with positive IgA anti-gliadin and IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies and associated symptoms: asthenia, anorexia, abdominal pain, abdominal distension and diarrhea. Subsequently, for further analytical research and to perform an upper digestive endoscopy with biopsy, a gluten diet was reintroduced. The child is followed in pedopsychiatry for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and challenging personality.

Predictors of Compliance to Gluten-Free Diet in Children with Celiac Disease

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder that presents intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms. It is also associated with cardiovascular diseases and malignancies, and mortality risk. The only way to control the disease is to follow a strict gluten-free diet (GFD) for the rest of life. Objectives: This survey aimed to investigate GFD non-adherence and causes in the pediatric setting. Methods: In this study, 187 children aged between 2.5 to 14 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of CD at least for a year were studied using a questionnaire-based interview in a census study between 2018 to 2019 in a referral center in southern Iran. Results: About 40% of children adhered to a GFD poorly. This group significantly complained of more symptoms than the group with high adherence. Improper access was the most important cause of non-adherence to a GFD. The mean current weight and at the time of diagnosis as well as the mean current BMI and at the time of diagnosis in the non-adherent group were significantly lower than the adherent group. However, IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies and histopathologic examination did not change remarkably. Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between following a GFD and age, age at the time of diagnosis, gender, and parental educational status. Conclusions: According to our results, inaccessibility, high costs, and lack of food labeling were the primary reasons for non-adherence to GDF. Therefore, to increase compliance, easy access to GFD with proper food labeling and suitable price should be implemented.

Diagnostic Accuracy of IgA Anti-Transglutaminase and IgG Anti-Deamidated Gliadin for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Children under Two Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The need of adding the determination of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) IgG to anti-transglutaminase (TTG) IgA antibodies for diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in children <2 years of age is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate, by head-to-head comparison, the diagnostic accuracy of TTG IgA and DGP IgG antibodies. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases up to January 2021. The diagnostic reference was intestinal biopsy. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of these tests and the odds ratio (OR) between the tests. Fifteen articles were eligible for the systematic review and ten were eligible for the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91–0.98) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85–0.99) for DGP IgG and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88–0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99) for TTG IgA, respectively. TTG IgA specificity was significantly higher (OR 9.3 (95% CI, 2.3–37.49); p < 0.001) while the sensitivity of DGP IgG was higher without reaching statistical significance (OR: 0.6 (95% CI, 0.24–1.51); p = 0.28). Both the meta-analysis and the systematic review showed that some children with early CD are missed without the DGP IgG test. In children <2 years of age, TTG IgA is the best CD screening test; however, the addition of DGP IgG may increase the diagnostic sensitivity.

IgA Deficiency Is Not Systematically Ruled Out in Patients Undergoing Celiac Disease Testing

Guidelines for celiac disease (CD) testing recommend total serum IgA determination alongside anti-transglutaminase IgA antibodies. It is not well known if lack of serum IgA determination is a common finding in clinical practice. To determine the prevalence of lack of serum IgA determination among patients screened for celiac disease. We identified all subjects who underwent serum anti-transglutaminase IgA and/or other CD-related antibodies determination at a single teaching hospital in Buenos Aires from October 2019 to February 2020. Medical records were reviewed to select adult patients who were tested for celiac disease. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with inadequate testing for celiac disease due to lack of serum IgA determination. We retrieved the following variables from each patient's record: age, gender, body mass index, symptoms present at screening, first-grade family history of CD, history of type-1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune hypothyroidism, Down's syndrome. Overall, 1122 patients were included for analysis. Lack of serum IgA determination prevalence was 20.49%. Among patients who did have serum IgA determination, the prevalence of IgA deficiency was 5.16%. The following variables were independently associated with a significantly increased odds of serum IgA determination: diarrhea [OR 1.55 (1.01-2.34)] and abdominal pain [OR 2.28 (1.44-3.63)]; higher body mass index [OR 0.91 (0.85-0.98)], osteoporosis [OR 0.49 (0.28-0.89)], hypothyroidism [OR 0.18 (0.07-0.45)], arthralgia/arthritis [OR 0.47 (0.27-0.85)], or testing by endocrinologist [OR 0.46 (0.23-0.91)] and gynecologist [OR 0.14 (0.06-0.31)] were inversely associated. IgA deficiency is not systematically ruled out in a relatively high proportion of patients undergoing serological screening of celiac disease.

Diagnosis of celiac disease in clinical practice: Present and future

IntroductionEuropean guidelines for the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) have been updated in 2020. The primary objective was to review the compliance with the diagnostic criteria for CD, according to ESPGHAN 2012. Secondarily, to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients and to assess the changes that would be implied by the application of the new 2020 criteria. Patients and methodsRetrospective multicenter study in which 10 centers participated. Patients from 0 to 16 years old with a new diagnosis of CD in 2018–2019 were included. Clinical, serological variables and the performance of intestinal biopsy (IB) were collected. Results163 patients were included (57% female) with a median age of 7.6 years (SD 4.4). The form of presentation was: 47.8% classical, 30.7% no classical and 21.5% asymptomatic, with differences depending on age. Total IgA and anti-transglutaminase IgA antibodies were performed in all centers as the first diagnostic step. IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) were performed in 80%, and HLA haplotype in 95%. Of the total, 78 cases (47.9%) met criteria for not performing intestinal biopsy (IB). IB was indicated in the remaining 85 patients, but was not performed in 29 cases (17.8%). The performance of IB was lower in the secondary hospitals than in the tertiary ones (p < 0.05).If we applied the ESPGHAN 2020 criteria, we would disregard the HLA study, and 21 more patients would not have required IB (going from 47.9% to 60.7% of the total). ConclusionsDiscrepancies are observed in the application of the ESPGHAN 2012 diagnostic criteria due to the different accessibility to EMA and endoscopic IB in secondary centers. With the ESPGHAN-2020 criteria, around 60% of patients will be able to be diagnosed without IB, provided that the determination of EMA is ensured.

Screening-detected positive serology for celiac disease: a real clinical challenge.

According to European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition 2020 criteria for celiac disease diagnosis, the small bowel biopsy (SBB) can be omitted in selected circumstances, even in asymptomatic patients. Hence, we have conducted a retrospective study to identify the histological findings of the asymptomatic patients with antitransglutaminase IgA antibodies 10 times above the upper limit of normal and positive antiendomisium antibodies; 5/24 patients fulfilling these criteria had, however, a nonconclusive SBB and were diagnosed with potential celiac disease. The nonbiopsy approach in these cases needs to be carefully evaluated and the risk of overdiagnosis pondered as the management and evolution of potential celiac disease cases is still a matter of study.

Impact of Serological and Histological Factors on Neurological Manifestations in Children and Adults with Celiac Disease.

PurposeCeliac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disease with extra-intestinal manifestations, including neurological disorders. There are few reports to assess various factors in increasing the chances of developing neurological disorders in CD, so we designed this study.MethodsAll patients with CD at any age who had been referred to the Celiac Clinic were evaluated for neurological problems. CD was defined as IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) of 18 IU/mL or higher in serology and Marsh type I or more severe in histopathological evaluation. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of various independent variables on the neurological manifestations.ResultsA total of 540 patients enrolled in this study. A 360 (66.7%) of patients were children. A 64.8% and 35.2% were female and male, respectively. Overall, 34.1% of patients had neurological manifestation, including headache, neuropathy, epilepsy, and ataxia. The odds of developing neurological manifestations in children were significantly lower than in adults (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.96; p=0.03) and in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms significantly higher than in the group without GI manifestations (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.18–2.63; p=0.005). Other variables, including Marsh classification (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18–1.11; p=0.08) and anti-tTG levels (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.999–1.001; p=0.59) did not significantly increase the chances of developing neurological disorders.ConclusionOur study showed that increasing age and the presence of GI symptoms, but not serological and histological findings, could increase the chances of developing neurological diseases in CD patients.

Celiac disease: Understandings in diagnostic, nutritional, and medicinal aspects

Celiac disease (CD) is characterized by clinical polymorphism, with classic, asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic, and extra-intestinal forms, which may lead to diagnostic delay and exposure to serious complications. CD is a multidisciplinary health concern involving general medicine, pediatric, and adult gastroenterology, among other disciplines. Immunology and pathology laboratories have a fundamental role in diagnosing and monitoring CD. The diagnosis consists of serological testing based on IgA anti-transglutaminase (TG2) antibodies combined with IgA quantification to rule out IgA deficiency, a potential misleading factor of CD diagnosis. Positive TG2 serology should be corroborated by anti-endomysium antibody testing before considering an intestinal biopsy. Owing to multiple differential diagnoses, celiac disease cannot be confirmed based on serological positivity alone, nor on isolated villous atrophy. In children with classical signs or even when asymptomatic, with high levels of CD-linked markers and positive HLA DQ2 and/or DQ8 molecules, the current trend is to confirm the diagnosis on basis of the non-systematic use of the biopsy, which remains obligatory in adults. The main challenge in managing CD is the implementation and compliance with a gluten-free diet (GFD). This explains the key role of the dietitian and the active participation of patients and their families throughout the disease-management process. The presence of the gluten in several forms of medicine requires the sensitization of physicians when prescribing, and particularly when dispensing gluten-containing formulations by pharmacists. This underlines the importance of the contribution of the pharmacist in the care of patients with CD within the framework of close collaboration with physicians and nutritionists.

Positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies with negative endomysial antibodies: Unresolved issues in diagnosing celiac disease

BackgroundThe serological screening for celiac disease (CD) is currently based on the detection of anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies, subsequently confirmed by positive endomysial antibodies (EMA). When an anti-tTG IgA positive/EMA IgA negative result occurs, it can be due either to the lower sensitivity of the EMA test or to the lower specificity of the anti-tTG test. This study aimed at verifying how variation in analytical specificity among different anti-tTG methods could account for this discrepancy. MethodsA total of 130 consecutive anti-tTG IgA positive/EMA negative samples were collected from the local screening routine and tested using five anti-tTG IgA commercial assays: two chemiluminescence methods, one fluoroimmunoenzymatic method, one immunoenzymatic method and one multiplex flow immunoassay method. ResultsTwenty three/130 (17.7%) patients were diagnosed with CD. In the other 107 cases a diagnosis of CD was not confirmed. The overall agreement among the five anti-tTG methods ranged from 28.5% to 77.7%. CD condition was more likely linked to the positivity of more than one anti-tTG IgA assay (monopositive = 2.5%, positive with ≥ three methods = 29.5%; p = 0.0004), but it was not related to anti-tTG IgA antibody levels (either positive or borderline; p = 0.5). ConclusionsPatients with positive anti-tTG/negative EMA have a low probability of being affected by CD. Given the high variability among methods to measure anti-tTG IgA antibodies, anti-tTG-positive/EMA-negative result must be considered with extreme caution. It is advisable that the laboratory report comments on any discordant results, suggesting to consider the data in the proper clinical context and to refer the patient to a CD reference center for prolonged follow up.

Diagnosis of celiac disease in clinical practice: present and future

European guidelines for the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) have been updated in 2020. The primary objective was to review the compliance with the diagnostic criteria for CD, according to ESPGHAN 2012. Secondarily, to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients and to assess the changes that would be implied by the application of the new 2020 criteria. Retrospective multicenter study in which 10 centers participated. Patients from 0 to 16 years old with a new diagnosis of CD in 2018-2019 were included. Clinical, serological variables and the performance of intestinal biopsy (IB) were collected. 163 patients were included (57% female) with a median age of 7.6 years (SD 4.4). The form of presentation was: 47.8% classical, 30.7% no classical and 21.5% asymptomatic, with differences depending on age. Total IgA and anti-transglutaminase IgA antibodies were performed in all centers as the first diagnostic step. IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) were performed in 80%, and HLA haplotype in 95%. Of the total, 78 cases (47.9%) met criteria for not performing intestinal biopsy (IB). IB was indicated in the remaining 85 patients, but was not performed in 29 cases (17.8%). The performance of IB was lower in the secondary hospitals than in the tertiary ones (p < 0.05). If we applied the ESPGHAN 2020 criteria, we would disregard the HLA study, and 21 more patients would not have required IB (going from 47.9% to 60.7% of the total). Discrepancies are observed in the application of the ESPGHAN 2012 diagnostic criteria due to the different accessibility to EMA and endoscopic IB in secondary centers. With the ESPGHAN-2020 criteria, around 60% of patients will be able to be diagnosed without IB, provided that the determination of EMA is ensured.

Anti-transglutaminase IgA antibody measurement in coeliac disease: Method comparison IDS-iSYS vs. Thermo Fisher Phadia

In coeliac disease, the diagnostic work-up is based on a combination of clinical, histopathological and serological evaluation. Among the serological tests, the presence of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies is the cornerstone owed to a high sensitivity and specificity. Recently, Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd (IDS) introduced the fully automated chemiluminescent autoimmune assays for use on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of the IDS-iSYS assay to the Thermo Fisher Phadia assay and to establish the upper reference limit of tTG IgA in a healthy population from Denmark based on the IDS-iSYS assay. We discovered a total imprecision of CV = 12.2% (2.87 AU/mL) and CV = 10.6% (47.55 AU/mL). Moreover, we compared the performance of IDS-iSYS assay to Thermo Fisher Phadia assay in 236 samples from unselected patients submit for tTG IgA testing and found a concordance of 97% (p < .0001). Furthermore, in 150 healthy blood donors, we established the upper reference limit of 3.26 AU/mL (95% CI: 3.10 − 3.90) was identified. Our study validates the performance of the IDS-iSYS tTG IgA assay and demonstrates results in concordance with the established Thermo Fisher Phadia. Furthermore, it provides estimates for the upper reference interval limit of the tTG-IgA.

Misuse of serological screening tests for celiac disease in children: A prospective study in Italy

BackgroundDespite a well-established diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease, it remains unclear whether prescriptions for celiac serological tests comply with the current pediatric guidelines. AimTo analyze the appropriateness of test prescription in children investigated for celiac disease in Italy, compared to the current European pediatric guidelines. MethodsAll children who had performed a first evaluation for celiac disease were prospectively enrolled. Prescribed tests and related indications for testing were recorded, and compared to the European pediatric guidelines. ResultsOverall, 202 children were enrolled (females 59%, mean age 7.1 years ±4.1) in two centers. The reasons for celiac disease testing were typical, atypical symptoms or celiac disease-associated conditions in 46.5%, 49%, and 4.5% of cases, respectively. First-line tests were IgA and IgG anti-transglutaminase antibodies in 88.1% and 29.7% of children, IgA and IgG anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies in 43% and 47%, IgA and IgG anti native gliadin in 15.8%, IgA anti-endomysium antibodies in 44.5%, HLA predisposing genes in 10% of patients. Test redundancy was very common, and the current diagnostic guidelines were correctly followed only in 23/202 patients (11.4%). ConclusionsDiagnostic European guidelines for celiac disease screening are often disregarded in Italy. Intervention to implement adherence to these guidelines is needed, with the aim of improving resource utilization, and quality of patient care.

False-negative IgA Anti-tissue Transglutaminase

The expanding knowledge about gluten-related autoimmunity led to a serology-based step-wised approach to diagnose celiac disease that might be misleading due to laboratory techniques. We present a rare case associating initial false-negative anti-transglutaminase IgA antibodies while CD was confirmed by IgG anti-transglutaminase and subsequent duodenal biopsy.

Genetics, environment, and asthma associated with celiac disease in the extended family of an affected child

IntroductionCeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy associated with gluten ingestion. In extended families of celiac patients that live in close proximity of one another, shared genetic and environmental factors can predispose them to CD. AimThe aim of this study was to provide evidence about the genetic and environmental factors involved in the development of CD in the extended family of a pediatric patient. MethodsThe medical history, environmental conditions, and participant weight, height, and peripheral blood samples were evaluated. The HLA-DQ2/DQ8 haplotypes were genotyped through qPCR testing and the IgA anti-gliadin and anti-transglutaminase antibodies were quantified using the ELISA test. ResultsTwelve close-living maternal relatives of the index case participated in the study. Eight of them presented with the HLA-DQ2 haplotype, inherited from the grandfather, and 7/12 and 9/12 were positive for IgA anti-gliadin and IgA anti-transglutaminase antibodies, respectively. The main intestinal symptoms stated by the participants were abdominal bloating, excess flatulence, constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux. The most frequent extra-intestinal symptoms were fatigue, stress, and anxiety. In addition, 6/13 participants had bronchial asthma. ConclusionThe extended family living in close proximity of one another shared a genetic predisposition, environmental conditions, and asthma, which could have predisposed them to celiac disease.

Safety of Oats in Children with Celiac Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

To evaluate the long-term validity and safety of pure oats in the treatment of children with celiac disease. This noninferiority clinical trial used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design extended over 15 months. Three hundred six children with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of celiac disease on a gluten-free diet for ≥2 years were randomly assigned to eat specifically prepared gluten-free food containing an age-dependent amount (15-40 g) of either placebo or purified nonreactive varieties of oats for 2 consecutive 6-month periods separated by washout standard gluten-free diet for 3 months. Clinical (body mass index, Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale score), serologic (IgA antitransglutaminase antibodies, and IgA anti-avenin antibodies), and intestinal permeability data were measured at baseline, and after 6, 9, and 15 months. Direct treatment effect was evaluated by a nonparametric approach using medians (95% CI) as summary statistic. After the exclusion of 129 patients who dropped out, the cohort included 177 children (79 in the oats-placebo and 98 in the placebo-oats group; median, 0.004; 95% CI, -0.0002 to 0.0089). Direct treatment effect was not statistically significant for clinical, serologic, and intestinal permeability variables (body mass index: median, -0.5; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.00; Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale score: median, 0; 95% CI, -2.5 to 0.00; IgA antitransglutaminase antibodies: median, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.23; IgA anti-avenin antibodies: median, -0.0002; 95% CI, -0.0007 to 0.0003; intestinal permeability test: median, 0.004; 95% CI, -0.0002 to 0.0089). Pure nonreactive oat products are a safe dietary choice in the treatment of children with celiac disease. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00808301.