Identification Of Vaginal Fluid Research Articles

Analysis of MiR-20b, MIR-197 markers for differentiation between forensic body fluids encountered in sexual assault cases

AbstractIdentifying body fluids can be a critical clue that aids in reconstructing the crime scene. Semen and vaginal fluid identification is crucial, especially in cases of sexual assault. The majority of forensic studies focused on identifying normal body fluids and neglected the expression variation of semen in pathology. To differentiate between vaginal fluids, fertile and infertile semen samples (oligospermia and azoospermia) using miR 20b and miR197. A total of 48 body fluid samples, divided as 16 vaginal fluids, 16 fertile semen, and 16 infertile semen samples (8 with oligospermia and 8 with azoospermia), were collected, and the expression levels of miR-20b and miR-197 were detected by the SYBR Green real-time quantitative PCR technique. Our results showed significant different expression of these miRNAs in normal semen compared to vaginal and infertile semen. Moreover, we designed a model based on Fisher’s discriminant function to forecast the group affiliations of unidentified samples. With three novel equations, we were able to accurately distinguish between semen and vaginal fluid, fertile and infertile semen, and oligospermia and azoospermia semen samples with validation accuracy of 81.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. MiR-20b and miR-197 expression levels are efficient and appropriate markers to distinguish semen from vaginal fluid and to differentiate between fertile and infertile semen samples. However, the present study is a preliminary study based on clinical samples, and the potential role of these markers in differentiating real crime scene samples is still unknown, so we recommend further research to investigate these markers expression while using forensic samples.

Rapid and visual detection of specific bacteria for saliva and vaginal fluid identification with the lateral flow dipstick strategy.

Identification of body fluids is critical for crime scene reconstruction, and a source of investigation source of investigative leads. In recent years, microbial DNA analysis using sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction have been used to identify body fluids. However, these techniques are time-consuming, expensive, and require complex workflows. In this study, a new method for simultaneous detection of Streptococcus salivarius and Lactobacillus crispatus using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in combination with a lateral flow dipstick (LFD) was developed to identify saliva and vaginal fluid in forensic samples. LFD results can be observed with the naked eye within 3min with a sensitivity of 0.001ng/µL DNA. The PCR-LFD assay was successfully used to detect S. salivarius and L. crispatus in saliva and vaginal fluid respectively, and showed negative results in blood, semen, nasal fluid, and skin. Moreover, saliva and vaginal fluid were detectable even at an extremely high mixing ratio of sample DNA (1:999). Saliva and vaginal fluid were identified in various mock forensic samples. These results indicate that saliva and vaginal fluid can be effectively detected by identifying S. salivarius and L. crispatus, respectively. Furthermore, we have shown that DNA samples used to identify saliva and vaginal fluid can also provide a complete short tandem repeat (STR) profile when used as source material for forensic STR profiling. In summary, our results suggest that PCR-LFD is a promising assay for rapid, simple, reliable, and efficient identification of body fluids.

Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid.

Although, DNA typing plays a decisive role in the identification of persons from blood and body fluid stains in criminal investigations, clarifying the origin of extracted DNA has also been considered an essential task in proving a criminal act. This review introduces the importance of developing precise methods for body fluid identification. Body fluid identification has long relied on enzymatic methods as a presumptive assay and histological or serological methods as a confirmatory assay. However, because the latest DNA typing methods can rapidly obtain results from very small and even old, poorly preserved samples, the development of a novel corresponding body fluid identification method is required. In particular, an immunochromatographic method has been introduced to identify saliva and semen from sexual crimes. In addition, for vaginal fluid identification, attempts have been made in the past decade to introduce a method relying on body fluid-specific mRNA expression levels. At present, the development of molecular biological methods involving microRNA, DNA methylation, and resident bacterial DNA is ongoing. Therefore, in criminal investigations, body fluid identification is an essential task for correctly applying the results of DNA typing, although further research and development are required.

Detection of vaginal fluid stains on common substrates via ATR FT-IR spectroscopy.

The analysis of body fluids is of utmost importance in forensic casework since many biological fluids contain DNA. The ATR FT-IR spectroscopy is an emerging approach for the confirmatory, rapid, facile, non-destructive, and on-site identification and differentiation of body fluid stains. Notwithstanding the ATR FT-IR spectroscopy is showing a colossal promise towards the identification of body fluids, and further forensic enquiry related to substrate's interference is still in its infancy stage. Therefore, in the present proof-of-concept study, the ATR FT-IR spectroscopy has been utilized for the detection of vaginal fluid stains and to investigate the effect of different substrates on sample analysis. Simulated vaginal fluid samples were prepared on some selected substrates such as glass, plastic, floor tiles, polished wood, paper, and on various cloth substrates and analyzed without any prior sample preparation. Results suggested that vaginal fluid can be successfully detected on non-porous substrates, but it turned out to be a challenging task on porous substrates. However, on the basis of certain peaks, successful identification of vaginal fluid can be done directly on various case-related substrates. The best approach for the detection of vaginal fluid depends upon the nature of substrates and type of interference encountered. In addition, 10 non-vaginal fluid substances which look similar to vaginal fluid and which may lead to misclassification of vaginal fluid or can deliver false-positive results were also analyzed. The spectra of look-alike substances were classified using the chemometric tools such as PCA and PCA-LDA. The developed PCA model successfully classified all vaginal fluid samples from non-vaginal fluid substances with 100% accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity rate. In addition, the effects of other factors such as aging and mixing with other body fluids have also been studied and the results have been described.

Development of a multiplex RT-PCR assay and statistical evaluation of its use in forensic identification of vaginal fluid.

The identification of vaginal fluid from casework samples of sexual assaults provides important probative evidence of vaginal intercourse. The aim of this study was to establish a more specific procedure for identifying vaginal fluids for forensic purposes. Vaginal fluid marker candidates have been evaluated quantitatively and five of these markers (ESR1, SERPINB13, KLK13, CYP2B7P1, MUC4) have been amplified simultaneously by a multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedure. Each amplicon has been separated and quantified automatically using chip electrophoresis. Subsequently, in the present study, detectability and cross-reactivity of the developed multiplex procedure were assessed in detail using various forensically relevant body fluids. Then, a cutoff value for the positive detection of vaginal fluids was set for each marker by Youden index. The ability of the multiplex RT-PCR assay to distinguish between vaginal and other body fluids was evaluated statistically using a likelihood ratio (LR) that was estimated using a Bayesian estimation approach to consider the infrequency of detection. A high LR was obtained when all five markers showed positive results (LR=4.33×109; 95% credible interval, 3.95×107-2.87×1012). The developed procedure was validated using vaginal fluid samples under various conditions. High LRs were found for aged vaginal fluid stains, although each amplicon peak was low. It was also able to identify vaginal stains mixed with other body fluids. In conclusion, the multiplex RT-PCR-based procedure followed by the statistical evaluation using LR could be a powerful tool for the objective identification of vaginal fluids.

Specific microbes of saliva and vaginal fluid of Guangdong Han females based on 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing.

Vaginal fluid and saliva are of great importance in forensic sciences. The identification of vaginal fluid or saliva is especially important in criminal cases. Microbes are considered as a promising marker for the identification of body fluids. In this study, 18 salivary fluids and 18 vaginal fluid samples were collected from 18 healthy women of the Han population in Guangdong province, China. The microbes of the above samples were analyzed by 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. The results showed that the microbes whose proportions are over 1% in saliva samples distributed across 12 genera and 57 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and in vaginal fluid distributed across 4 genera and 9 OTUs. The microbes that dominated in saliva were quite different from those dominated in vaginal fluids. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) algorithm was used to screen out the specific microbes of the studied samples, and the results showed that the specific microbes in saliva samples are Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Veillonella parvula, and Aggregatibacter segnis, while in vaginal fluid is Lactobacillus iners.

Quantitative evaluation of candidate genes and development of a multiplex RT-PCR assay for the forensic identification of vaginal fluid

The identification of vaginal fluid from a mixed sample containing semen provides important probative evidence of vaginal intercourse in sexual assaults. In studies on the mRNA-based identification of body fluids, vaginal characteristic genes, such as MUC4 and HBD1, have been used to identify vaginal fluid; however, these are insufficient to discriminate vaginal fluid from other body fluids because of incomplete specificity and detectability. The aim of this study was to develop a more specific procedure for identifying vaginal fluid. First, previously reported and newly selected candidate genes were evaluated quantitatively using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Then, we developed a multiplex RT-PCR assay to detect probable candidates simultaneously. Each amplicon was detected and quantified by chip electrophoresis. Furthermore, we examined the specificity and robustness of the developed multiplex RT-PCR assay using various body fluids and aged vaginal fluid stains. As a result of this real-time RT-PCR assay, we selected five candidate genes—MUC4, CYP2B7P1, KLK13, ESR1, and SERPINB13—on the basis of their specificity and sensitivity. Then, the simultaneous amplification of these genes was performed successfully, and each fragment could be separated and quantified automatically by chip electrophoresis. The specificity and detectability of the multiplex detection of vaginal characteristic genes were almost comparable to those of real-time RT-PCR and it could be applied to vaginal fluid samples stored at room temperature for 1.5 years. Although discrimination criteria should be set, the multiplex RT-PCR assay developed in this study could be an effective tool for the identification of vaginal fluid.

Informativeness of NGS Analysis for Vaginal Fluid Identification.

The identification of vaginal fluids in forensic examinations plays an important role in crime scene reconstruction. Molecular detection of vaginal bacterial communities can lead to the correct discrimination of body fluids. These kinds of studies can be performed through multiplex real-time PCR using primers for a specific selection of bacteria. The availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocols provided for the extension of the analysis to evaluate the prokaryotes present in specimens. In this study, DNA was extracted from 18 samples (vaginal, oral, fecal, yoghurt) and analyzed by real-time PCR and NGS. The comparison between the two approaches has demonstrated that the information developed through NGS can augment the more conventional real-time PCR detection of a few key bacterial species to provide a more probative result and the correct identification of vaginal fluid from samples that are more forensically challenged.

Identification of Vaginal Fluid Using Microbial Signatures

To investigate the specific microbial signatures in vaginal fluid. Vaginal fluid （16 samples）, saliva （16 samples）, feces （16 samples）, semen （8 samples）, peripheral blood （8 samples）, urine （5 samples）, and nasal secretion （4 samples） were collected respectively. The 16S rRNA genes of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus iners, and Atopobium vaginae were amplified. PCR production was detected via a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. The detected number of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus iners, and Atopobium vaginae were 15, 5, 8, 14, and 3 in all vaginal fluid samples, respectively. Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus jensenii existed specifically in vaginal fluid. There is a potential application value to detect Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus jensenii for the identification of vaginal fluid.

Identification of vaginal fluid, saliva, and feces using microbial signatures in a Han Chinese population

In recent years, forensic scientists have focused on the discrimination of body fluids using microbial signatures. In this study, we performed PCR-based detection of microbial signatures of vaginal fluid, saliva, and feces in a Han Chinese population. We investigated the 16S rRNA genes of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus iners, and Atopobium vaginae in vaginal fluid, the 16S rRNA and the glucosyltransferase enzyme genes of Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus mutans in saliva, and the 16S rRNA genes of Enterococcus species, the RNA polymerase β-subunit gene of Bacteroides uniformis and Bacteroides vulgatus, and the α-1-6 mannanase gene of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in feces. As a result, the detection proportions of L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, L. iners, and A. vaginae were 15/16, 5/16, 8/16, 14/16, and 3/16 in 16 vaginal fluid donors, respectively. L. crispatus and L. jensenii were specifically detected in vaginal fluid; L. gasseri, L. iners, and A. vaginae were also detected in non-vaginal fluid. S. salivarius and S. mutans were not specifically detected in saliva. The detection proportions of Enterococcus species, B. uniformis, B. vulgatus, and B. thetaiotaomicron in 16 feces samples were 16/16, 12/16, 15/16, and 11/16, respectively. B. uniformis and B. thetaiotaomicron were specifically detected in feces. In addition, DNA samples prepared for the identification of body fluid can also be used for individual identification by short tandem repeat typing. The mean detection sensitivities of L. crispatus and L. jensenii were 0.362 and 0.249 pg/uL, respectively. In conclusion, L. crispatus, L. jensenii, B. uniformis, and B. thetaiotaomicron can be used as effective markers for forensic identification of vaginal fluid and feces.

MRNA Profiling for Vaginal Fluid and Menstrual Blood Identification.

Recently mRNA profiling has been widely proposed as a universal tool for biological fluids identification. Here, we describe a test for vaginal fluid identification that combines detection of five markers: vaginal mRNAs and Lactobacilli in end-point PCR reaction. The test detects the following transcripts: HBD1 (Human beta-defensin 1), MUC4 (Mucin 4), MMP11 (Matrix metalloproteinase 11), housekeeping gene G6PDH (glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase), and the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions of L. crispatus and L. gasseri/L. johnsonii. Simultaneous analysis of five vaginal markers and a housekeeping gene ensures high specificity and reliability in the detection of vaginal material, which could not be obtained using detection of a single marker.

Detection of fatty acid-binding protein 5 and small proline-rich protein 3 for forensic vaginal fluid identification by ELISA

Vaginal fluid identification is often required for forensic investigation of sexual assault cases.

Identification and evaluation of potential forensic marker proteins in vaginal fluid by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Vaginal fluid is one of the most common body fluids found at crime scenes. Discriminating vaginal fluid from other body fluids is important in forensic science; however, few potential protein markers have been reported to date. Proteomic methods for identifying protein markers have gained attention, although few reports have applied this technology to forensic protein markers. Therefore, to identify characteristic vaginal proteins, we examined various body fluids (nasal secretions, saliva, urine, semen, vaginal fluids, and sweat) using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and peptide mass fingerprinting. We identified three components (average molecular mass values 17,237 ± 2, 18,063 ± 2, and 15,075 ± 1) detectable only in vaginal samples: two human small proline-rich protein 3 (SPRR3) isoforms and a human fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) with an acetylated (+42) N-terminal region lacking the initiator methionine residue (-131). Using ELISA, these yielded markedly high average values in vaginal fluids. The mass spectra of these proteins were not detected in infant saliva but were detected in the vaginal fluid throughout the menstrual cycle. The results of forensic analysis (detection limit, mixed body fluid samples, casework samples, and blind samples) suggest that these proteins are potential forensic markers. In conclusion, high SPRR3 and FABP5 expression levels, which may be used as potential markers for vaginal fluid identification in forensic science, were detected in vaginal fluids from healthy adults.

Forensic interlaboratory evaluation of the ForFLUID kit for vaginal fluids identification

Identification of vaginal fluids is an important step in the process of sexual assaults confirmation. Advances in both microbiology and molecular biology defined technical approaches allowing the discrimination of body fluids. These protocols are based on the identification of specific bacterial communities by microfloraDNA (mfDNA) amplification. A multiplex real time-PCR assay (ForFLUID kit) has been developed for identifying biological fluids and for discrimination among vaginal, oral and fecal samples. In order to test its efficacy and reliability of the assay in the identification of vaginal fluids, an interlaboratory evaluation has been performed on homogeneous vaginal swabs. All the involved laboratories were able to correctly recognize all the vaginal swabs, and no false positives were identified when the assay was applied on non-vaginal samples. The assay represents an useful molecular tool that can be easily adopted by forensic geneticists involved in vaginal fluid identification.

MRNA profiling for vaginal fluid and menstrual blood identification

The detection and identification of human biological fluids, including vaginal secretions and menstrual blood, are highly important in forensic biology. Previous studies have proposed a few mRNA and bacterial markers for vaginal fluid detection, but they have not proven to be specific and reliable. The aim of this project was to develop, validate and evaluate a reliable, specific test for vaginal fluid identification that would combine detection of vaginal mRNAs and Lactobacilli. We have developed a hexaplex that detects HBD1 (human beta-defensin 1), MUC4 (mucin 4), menstrual blood marker MMP11 (matrix metalloproteinase 11), housekeeping gene G6PDH (glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase) and the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus gasseri/Lactobacillus johnsonii. We analysed the specificity of the markers and variations among women, as well as the sensitivity of the test and its ability to detect vaginal fluid in mixtures with semen and blood. This approach allows for the detection of vaginal fluid in stains that were up to 2 years old, if stored at room temperature and up to 18 years old if stored frozen. Through simultaneous analysis of 5 vaginal markers, the proposed hexaplex ensures high specificity and reliability in the detection of vaginal material.

Molecular identification of vaginal fluid by microbial signature

The discrimination of body fluids in forensic examinations can play an important role in crime scene reconstruction. Conventional methods rely on the detection of antigens or enzymatic activity, limiting detection sensitivity and specificity, particularly on old forensic samples. Methods based on human RNA analysis are not easily applicable to samples exposed to harsh and degrading environments. An alternative approach based on the identification of prokaryotic genomes was developed. Specific bacterial communities are characteristic typical of different human non-sterile body fluids: the molecular characterization of a microbial signature, and not the typing of single bacterial species, can effectively lead to univocal identification of these fluids.A multiplex real time PCR assay was developed using oligonucleotide mixtures targeting genomes specific for a selected group of bacteria. Microflora DNA (mfDNA) was extracted from vaginal, oral and fecal clinical swabs. In addition forensic samples were processed. Vaginal samples showed a strong specific signal for bacteria of the female genital tract. Oral samples clearly showed signal for bacteria present in saliva, and in fecal samples the main signal was from Enterococcaceae. Vaginal casework samples showed results comparable to freshly collected ones; moreover the DNA extracted was successfully used for STR typing. Also mixtures of body fluids were analyzed, providing a microbiological signature compatible with the presence of microbes of oral, fecal and vaginal origin. The presented method can be useful in identifying biological fluids, and it is based on DNA technologies already available in forensic laboratories and feasible for further high throughput automation.

Detection of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes for forensic identification of vaginal fluid

To preliminarily evaluate the applicability of bacterial DNA as a marker for the forensic identification of vaginal fluid, we developed and performed PCR-based detection of 16S ribosomal RNA genes of Lactobacillus spp. dominating the vagina and of bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria from DNA extracted from body fluids and stains. As a result, 16S ribosomal RNA genes of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus jensenii and Atopobium vaginae were specifically detected in vaginal fluid and female urine samples. Bacterial genes detected in female urine might have originated from contaminated vaginal fluid. In addition, those of Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus gasseri and Gardnerella vaginalis were also detected in non-vaginal body fluids such as semen. Because bacterial genes were successfully amplified in DNA samples extracted by using the general procedure for animal tissues without any optional treatments, DNA samples prepared for the identification of vaginal fluid can also be used for personal identification. In conclusion, 16S ribosomal RNA genes of L. crispatus, L. jensenii and A. vaginae could be effective markers for forensic identification of vaginal fluid.

Validity of wet-mount bacterial morphotype identification of vaginal fluid by phase-contrast microscopy for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in family practice.

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a wet-mount bacterial morphology scoring (BMS) system and Nugent's Gram stain analysis for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, using Amsel's criteria as the gold standard. The three diagnostic criteria were assessed independently The BMS diagnosis was based on a scoring system which weighed the number of small bacterial morphotypes regarded as typical of bacterial vaginosis against lactobacillary morphotypes in phase-contrast microscopy of wet-mount preparations. Three groups of non-pregnant women attending either because of vaginal discharge, other genitourinary symptoms, or for a routine check-up, and a group of pregnant women attending for antenatal care were studied. The diagnostic accuracy was measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio. The accuracy of the BMS diagnosis was substantially high in all of the examined groups (LR 15.4-20.3). The accuracy of the Gram stain diagnosis was lower (LR 7.6-10.9). In the total material, the accuracy of the BMS diagnosis was higher than that of the Nugent's Gram staining. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of all three criteria applied was high. We propose greater routine use of the new BMS diagnosis for point-of-care testing in family practice as well as in research and in microbiology laboratories.