Identification Of Cancer Driver Genes Research Articles

Assessing the validity of driver gene identification tools for targeted genome sequencing data.

Most cancer driver gene identification tools have been developed for whole-exome sequencing data. Targeted sequencing is a popular alternative to whole-exome sequencing for large cancer studies due to its greater depth at a lower cost per tumor. Unlike whole-exome sequencing, targeted sequencing only enables mutation calling for a selected subset of genes. Whether existing driver gene identification tools remain valid in that context has not previously been studied. We evaluated the validity of seven popular driver gene identification tools when applied to targeted sequencing data. Based on whole-exome data of 14 different cancer types from TCGA, we constructed matching targeted datasets by keeping only the mutations overlapping with the pan-cancer MSK-IMPACT panel and, in the case of breast cancer, also the breast-cancer-specific B-CAST panel. We then compared the driver gene predictions obtained on whole-exome and targeted mutation data for each of the seven tools. Differences in how the tools model background mutation rates were the most important determinant of their validity on targeted sequencing data. Based on our results, we recommend OncodriveFML, OncodriveCLUSTL, 20/20+, dNdSCv, and ActiveDriver for driver gene identification in targeted sequencing data, whereas MutSigCV and DriverML are best avoided in that context. Code for the analyses is available at https://github.com/SchmidtGroupNKI/TGSdrivergene_validity.

Identification of cancer driver genes based on hierarchical weak consensus model.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13755-024-00279-6.

Multi-Network Graph Contrastive Learning for cancer driver gene identification

Multi-Network Graph Contrastive Learning for cancer driver gene identification

Identifying Significantly Perturbed Subnetworks in Cancer Using Multiple Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.

The identification of cancer driver genes and key molecular pathways has been the focus of large-scale cancer genome studies. Network-based methods detect significantly perturbed subnetworks as putative cancer pathways by incorporating genomics data with the topological information of PPI networks. However, commonly used PPI networks have distinct topological structures, making the results of the same method vary widely when applied to different networks. Furthermore, emerging context-specific PPI networks often have incomplete topological structures, which pose serious challenges for existing subnetwork detection algorithms. In this paper, we propose a novel method, referred to as MultiFDRnet, to address the above issues. The basic idea is to model a set of PPI networks as a multiplex network to preserve the topological structure of individual networks, while introducing dependencies among them, and, then, to detect significantly perturbed subnetworks on the modeled multiplex network using all the structural information simultaneously. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, an extensive benchmark analysis was conducted on both simulated and real cancer data. The experimental results showed that the proposed method is able to detect significantly perturbed subnetworks jointly supported by multiple PPI networks and to identify novel modular structures in context-specific PPI networks.

A novel heterophilic graph diffusion convolutional network for identifying cancer driver genes.

Identifying cancer driver genes plays a curial role in the development of precision oncology and cancer therapeutics. Although a plethora of methods have been developed to tackle this problem, the complex cancer mechanisms and intricate interactions between genes still make the identification of cancer driver genes challenging. In this work, we propose a novel machine learning method of heterophilic graph diffusion convolutional networks (called HGDCs) to boost cancer-driver gene identification. Specifically, HGDC first introduces graph diffusion to generate an auxiliary network for capturing the structurally similar nodes in a biomolecular network. Then, HGDC designs an improved message aggregation and propagation scheme to adapt to the heterophilic setting of biomolecular networks, alleviating the problem of driver gene features being smoothed by its neighboring dissimilar genes. Finally, HGDC uses a layer-wise attention classifier to predict the probability of one gene being a cancer driver gene. In the comparison experiments with other existing state-of-the-art methods, our HGDC achieves outstanding performance in identifying cancer driver genes. The experimental results demonstrate that HGDC not only effectively identifies well-known driver genes on different networks but also novel candidate cancer genes. Moreover, HGDC can effectively prioritize cancer driver genes for individual patients. Particularly, HGDC can identify patient-specific additional driver genes, which work together with the well-known driver genes to cooperatively promote tumorigenesis.

Identification of Cancer Driver Genes by Integrating Multiomics Data with Graph Neural Networks

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease that is driven by the accumulation of both genetic and nongenetic alterations, so integrating multiomics data and extracting effective information from them is expected to be an effective way to predict cancer driver genes. In this paper, we first generate comprehensive instructive features for each gene from genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic levels together with protein-protein interaction (PPI)-networks-derived attributes and then propose a novel semisupervised deep graph learning framework GGraphSAGE to predict cancer driver genes according to the impact of the alterations on a biological system. When applied to eight tumor types, experimental results suggest that GGraphSAGE outperforms several state-of-the-art computational methods for driver genes identification. Moreover, it broadens our current understanding of cancer driver genes from multiomics level and identifies driver genes specific to the tumor type rather than pan-cancer. We expect GGraphSAGE to open new avenues in precision medicine and even further predict drivers for other complex diseases.

IMI-driver: integrating multi-level gene networks and multi-omics for cancer driver gene identification

IMI-driver: integrating multi-level gene networks and multi-omics for cancer driver gene identification

IDriveGenes: Cancer Driver Genes Prediction Using Machine Learning

The development of high throughput sequencing technologies i.e. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is revolutionizing the exploration of cancer. Though sequence datasets are highly complex, mutation can occur randomly in DNA or RNA sequences that can make cells sicker or less fit. The unusual growth and behavior of genes in cells cause cancer. Cancer-driver gene cells grow when mutation occurs. Identification of cancer driver genes is a critical and challenging issue for researchers. In the proposed work, initially, robust features are extracted from the sequence dataset through Position Relative Incidence Matrix (PRIM) integrated with Accumulative Absolute Position Incidence Vector (AAPIV) generation. PRIM and AAPIV convert the single-dimensional sequence data into 2-dimensional numeric data. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NN), and Random Forest (RF) are used to train the model. The proposed model is validated with different validation methods i.e., independent testing, k-fold cross-validation, self-consistency, and jackknife testing. The proposed model predicts whether the given primary structure corresponds to cancer driver genes or not. Results analyses show 95%, 92%, and 69% accuracy on RF, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and SVM respectively. The comparative analysis with existing state-of-the-art models i.e., 20/20+ and Multimodal Deep Neural Network by integrating Multi-dimensional Data (NDNNMD) shows that the proposed model outperforms the existing techniques.

A network-based method for identifying cancer driver genes based on node control centrality.

Cancer is one of the major contributors to human mortality and has a serious influence on human survival and health. In biomedical research, the identification of cancer driver genes (cancer drivers for short) is an important task; cancer drivers can promote the progression and generation of cancer. To identify cancer drivers, many methods have been developed. These computational models only identify coding cancer drivers; however, non-coding drivers likewise play significant roles in the progression of cancer. Hence, we propose a Network-based Method for identifying cancer Driver Genes based on node Control Centrality (NMDGCC), which can identify coding and non-coding cancer driver genes. The process of NMDGCC for identifying driver genes mainly includes the following two steps. In the first step, we construct a gene interaction network by using mRNAs and miRNAs expression data in the cancer state. In the second step, the control centrality of the node is used to identify cancer drivers in the constructed network. We use the breast cancer dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to verify the effectiveness of NMDGCC. Compared with the existing methods of cancer driver genes identification, NMDGCC has a better performance. NMDGCC also identifies 295 miRNAs as non-coding cancer drivers, of which 158 are related to tumorigenesis of BRCA. We also apply NMDGCC to identify driver genes related to the different breast cancer subtypes. The result shows that NMDGCC detects many cancer drivers of specific cancer subtypes.

From Samples to Germline and Somatic Sequence Variation: A Focus on Next-Generation Sequencing in Melanoma Research.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) applications have flourished in the last decade, permitting the identification of cancer driver genes and profoundly expanding the possibilities of genomic studies of cancer, including melanoma. Here we aimed to present a technical review across many of the methodological approaches brought by the use of NGS applications with a focus on assessing germline and somatic sequence variation. We provide cautionary notes and discuss key technical details involved in library preparation, the most common problems with the samples, and guidance to circumvent them. We also provide an overview of the sequence-based methods for cancer genomics, exposing the pros and cons of targeted sequencing vs. exome or whole-genome sequencing (WGS), the fundamentals of the most common commercial platforms, and a comparison of throughputs and key applications. Details of the steps and the main software involved in the bioinformatics processing of the sequencing results, from preprocessing to variant prioritization and filtering, are also provided in the context of the full spectrum of genetic variation (SNVs, indels, CNVs, structural variation, and gene fusions). Finally, we put the emphasis on selected bioinformatic pipelines behind (a) short-read WGS identification of small germline and somatic variants, (b) detection of gene fusions from transcriptomes, and (c) de novo assembly of genomes from long-read WGS data. Overall, we provide comprehensive guidance across the main methodological procedures involved in obtaining sequencing results for the most common short- and long-read NGS platforms, highlighting key applications in melanoma research.

DGMP: Identifying Cancer Driver Genes by Jointing DGCN and MLP from Multi-omics Genomic Data

Identification of cancer driver genes plays an important role in precision oncology research, which is helpful to understand cancer initiation and progression. However, most existing computational methods mainly used the protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks, or treated the directed gene regulatory networks (GRNs) as the undirected gene–gene association networks to identify the cancer driver genes, which will lose the unique structure regulatory information in the directed GRNs, and then affect the outcome of the cancer driver gene identification. Here, based on the multi-omics pan-cancer data (i.e., gene expression, mutation, copy number variation, and DNA methylation), we propose a novel method (called DGMP) to identify cancer driver genes by jointing directed graph convolutional network (DGCN) and multilayer perceptron (MLP). DGMP learns the multi-omics features of genes as well as the topological structure features in GRN with the DGCN model and uses MLP to weigh more on gene features for mitigating the bias toward the graph topological features in the DGCN learning process. The results on three GRNs show that DGMP outperforms other existing state-of-the-art methods. The ablation experimental results on the DawnNet network indicate that introducing MLP into DGCN can offset the performance degradation of DGCN, and jointing MLP and DGCN can effectively improve the performance of identifying cancer driver genes. DGMP can identify not only the highly mutated cancer driver genes but also the driver genes harboring other kinds of alterations (e.g., differential expression and aberrant DNA methylation) or genes involved in GRNs with other cancer genes. The source code of DGMP can be freely downloaded from https://github.com/NWPU-903PR/DGMP.

MODIG: integrating multi-omics and multi-dimensional gene network for cancer driver gene identification based on graph attention network model.

Identifying genes that play a causal role in cancer evolution remains one of the biggest challenges in cancer biology. With the accumulation of high-throughput multi-omics data over decades, it becomes a great challenge to effectively integrate these data into the identification of cancer driver genes. Here, we propose MODIG, a graph attention network (GAT)-based framework to identify cancer driver genes by combining multi-omics pan-cancer data (mutations, copy number variants, gene expression and methylation levels) with multi-dimensional gene networks. First, we established diverse types of gene relationship maps based on protein-protein interactions, gene sequence similarity, KEGG pathway co-occurrence, gene co-expression patterns and gene ontology. Then, we constructed a multi-dimensional gene network consisting of approximately 20000 genes as nodes and five types of gene associations as multiplex edges. We applied a GAT to model within-dimension interactions to generate a gene representation for each dimension based on this graph. Moreover, we introduced a joint learning module to fuse multiple dimension-specific representations to generate general gene representations. Finally, we used the obtained gene representation to perform a semi-supervised driver gene identification task. The experiment results show that MODIG outperforms the baseline models in terms of area under precision-recall curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. The MODIG program is available at https://github.com/zjupgx/modig. The code and data underlying this article are also available on Zenodo, at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7057241. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Estimating tumor mutational burden from RNA-sequencing without a matched-normal sample

Detection of somatic mutations using patients sequencing data has many clinical applications, including the identification of cancer driver genes, detection of mutational signatures, and estimation of tumor mutational burden (TMB). We have previously developed a tool for detection of somatic mutations using tumor RNA and a matched-normal DNA. Here, we further extend it to detect somatic mutations from RNA sequencing data without a matched-normal sample. This is accomplished via a machine-learning approach that classifies mutations as either somatic or germline based on various features. When applied to RNA-sequencing of >450 melanoma samples high precision and recall are achieved, and both mutational signatures and driver genes are correctly identified. Finally, we show that RNA-based TMB is significantly associated with patient survival, showing similar or higher significance level as compared to DNA-based TMB. Our pipeline can be utilized in many future applications, analyzing novel and existing datasets where only RNA is available.

Detection of oncogenic and clinically actionable mutations in cancer genomes critically depends on variant calling tools.

MotivationThe analysis of cancer genomes provides fundamental information about its etiology, the processes driving cell transformation or potential treatments. While researchers and clinicians are often only interested in the identification of oncogenic mutations, actionable variants or mutational signatures, the first crucial step in the analysis of any tumor genome is the identification of somatic variants in cancer cells (i.e. those that have been acquired during their evolution). For that purpose, a wide range of computational tools have been developed in recent years to detect somatic mutations in sequencing data from tumor samples. While there have been some efforts to benchmark somatic variant calling tools and strategies, the extent to which variant calling decisions impact the results of downstream analyses of tumor genomes remains unknown.ResultsHere, we quantify the impact of variant calling decisions by comparing the results obtained in three important analyses of cancer genomics data (identification of cancer driver genes, quantification of mutational signatures and detection of clinically actionable variants) when changing the somatic variant caller (MuSE, MuTect2, SomaticSniper and VarScan2) or the strategy to combine them (Consensus of two, Consensus of three and Union) across all 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Our results show that variant calling decisions have a significant impact on these analyses, creating important differences that could even impact treatment decisions for some patients. Moreover, the Consensus of three calling strategy to combine the output of multiple variant calling tools, a very widely used strategy by the research community, can lead to the loss of some cancer driver genes and actionable mutations. Overall, our results highlight the limitations of widespread practices within the cancer genomics community and point to important differences in critical analyses of tumor sequencing data depending on variant calling, affecting even the identification of clinically actionable variants.Availability and implementationCode is available at https://github.com/carlosgarciaprieto/VariantCallingClinicalBenchmark.Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Role of Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) Genes in Uterine Leiomyosarcomas: A Retrospective Analysis.

Simple SummaryA more in-depth molecular characterization of uterine leiomyosarcomas (uLMS), a rare disease characterized with dismal prognosis, could provide data suitable for the identification of potential target-based drugs. We aimed to define frequencies of gene alterations in uLMS, especially regarding the somatic mutations of BRCA and HRR gene alterations, and identify the impact of these molecular alterations on clinical outcomes. This retrospective analysis of the mutational profile of uLMS showed that the most frequent alterations involved the TP53 gene, and that patients with TP53 alterations experienced a worse prognosis compared to patients with wild-type TP53 genes. Conversely, patient clinical outcomes were similar within patients with BRCA- and HRR-related genes versus non-HRR-related genes. However, although the frequency of patients with BRCA- and HRR-related alterations and mutations was relatively small, this setting could deserve an investigation into drug actionability, and potentially benefit from PARP inhibitors.Uterine leiomyosarcomas (uLMS) is a very rare disease, and patients experience a dismal prognosis even when treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, a more in-depth molecular characterization of this disease could provide suitable data for the identification of potential target-based drugs. This retrospective, single institutional study aimed to define the frequencies of gene alterations in uLMS, especially regarding the somatic mutations of BRCA and Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) genes, and the impact of molecular alterations on clinical outcomes. The 16-genes Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel, Homologous Recombination Solution TM (HRS, Sophia Genetics, Saint Sulpice, Switzerland), was used for the molecular evaluation of samples. The majority of patients (66/105, 63%) carried at least one sequence alteration, with a prevalence of TP53 involvement followed by RAD51B, BRCA1/2, and FANCL. Patients with TP53 gene alterations experienced a significantly worse prognosis for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus wild-type patients. Given the number of patients with the BRCA1/2 mutation (N = 12), we included them in the HRR patient group; there was no difference in clinical outcomes with HRR versus non-HRR. The Cox’s multivariate analysis showed that stage and TP53 gene alterations resulted in a significantly worse OS. The integration of gene networking data, such as tumor mutation burdens and cancer driver gene identification, could show a clearer discrimination of gene distribution patterns, and lead to the implementation of therapeutic targets.

DGRanker: Cancer Driver Gene Detection in Human Transcriptional Regulatory Network.

Cancer is a group of diseases that have received much attention in biological research because of its high mortality rate and the lack of accurate identification of its root causes. In such studies, researchers usually try to identify cancer driver genes (CDGs) that start cancer in a cell. The majority of the methods that have ever been proposed for the identification of CDGs are based on gene expression data and the concept of mutation in genomic data. Recently, using networking techniques and the concept of influence maximization, some models have been proposed to identify these genes. We aimed to construct the cancer transcriptional regulatory network and identify cancer driver genes using a network science approach without the use of mutation and genomic data. In this study, we will employ the social influence network theory to identify CDGs in the human gene regulatory network (GRN) that is based on the concept of influence and power of webpages. First, we will create GRN Networks using gene expression data and Existing nodes and edges. Next, we will implement the modified algorithm on GRN networks being studied by weighting the regulatory interaction edges using the influence spread concept. Nodes with the highest ratings will be selected as the CDGs. The results show our proposed method outperforms most of the other computational and network-based methods and show its superiority in identifying CDGs compared to many other methods. In addition, the proposed method canidentifymany CDGs that are overlooked by all previously published methods. Our study demonstrated that the Google's PageRank algorithm can be utilized and modified as a network-based method for identifying cancer driver gene in transcriptional regulatory network. Furthermore, the proposed method can be considered as a complementary method to the computational-based cancer driver gene identification tools.

A Network-Centric Framework for the Evaluation of Mutual Exclusivity Tests on Cancer Drivers.

One of the key concepts employed in cancer driver gene identification is that of mutual exclusivity (ME); a driver mutation is less likely to occur in case of an earlier mutation that has common functionality in the same molecular pathway. Several ME tests have been proposed recently, however the current protocols to evaluate ME tests have two main limitations. Firstly the evaluations are mostly with respect to simulated data and secondly the evaluation metrics lack a network-centric view. The latter is especially crucial as the notion of common functionality can be achieved through searching for interaction patterns in relevant networks. We propose a network-centric framework to evaluate the pairwise significances found by statistical ME tests. It has three main components. The first component consists of metrics employed in the network-centric ME evaluations. Such metrics are designed so that network knowledge and the reference set of known cancer genes are incorporated in ME evaluations under a careful definition of proper control groups. The other two components are designed as further mechanisms to avoid confounders inherent in ME detection on top of the network-centric view. To this end, our second objective is to dissect the side effects caused by mutation load artifacts where mutations driving tumor subtypes with low mutation load might be incorrectly diagnosed as mutually exclusive. Finally, as part of the third main component, the confounding issue stemming from the use of nonspecific interaction networks generated as combinations of interactions from different tissues is resolved through the creation and use of tissue-specific networks in the proposed framework. The data, the source code and useful scripts are available at: https://github.com/abu-compbio/NetCentric.

Improving cancer driver gene identification using multi-task learning on graph convolutional network.

Cancer is thought to be caused by the accumulation of driver genetic mutations. Therefore, identifying cancer driver genes plays a crucial role in understanding the molecular mechanism of cancer and developing precision therapies and biomarkers. In this work, we propose a Multi-Task learning method, called MTGCN, based on the Graph Convolutional Network to identify cancer driver genes. First, we augment gene features by introducing their features on the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. After that, the multi-task learning framework propagates and aggregates nodes and graph features from input to next layer to learn node embedding features, simultaneously optimizing the node prediction task and the link prediction task. Finally, we use a Bayesian task weight learner to balance the two tasks automatically. The outputs of MTGCN assign each gene a probability of being a cancer driver gene. Our method and the other four existing methods are applied to predict cancer drivers for pan-cancer and some single cancer types. The experimental results show that our model shows outstanding performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods in terms of the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the precision-recall curves. The MTGCN is freely available via https://github.com/weiba/MTGCN.

ParsVNN: parsimony visible neural networks for uncovering cancer-specific and drug-sensitive genes and pathways.

Prediction of cancer-specific drug responses as well as identification of the corresponding drug-sensitive genes and pathways remains a major biological and clinical challenge. Deep learning models hold immense promise for better drug response predictions, but most of them cannot provide biological and clinical interpretability. Visible neural network (VNN) models have emerged to solve the problem by giving neurons biological meanings and directly casting biological networks into the models. However, the biological networks used in VNNs are often redundant and contain components that are irrelevant to the downstream predictions. Therefore, the VNNs using these redundant biological networks are overparameterized, which significantly limits VNNs’ predictive and explanatory power. To overcome the problem, we treat the edges and nodes in biological networks used in VNNs as features and develop a sparse learning framework ParsVNN to learn parsimony VNNs with only edges and nodes that contribute the most to the prediction task. We applied ParsVNN to build cancer-specific VNN models to predict drug response for five different cancer types. We demonstrated that the parsimony VNNs built by ParsVNN are superior to other state-of-the-art methods in terms of prediction performance and identification of cancer driver genes. Furthermore, we found that the pathways selected by ParsVNN have great potential to predict clinical outcomes as well as recommend synergistic drug combinations.

Mutations in Noncoding Cis-Regulatory Elements Reveal Cancer Driver Cistromes in Luminal Breast Cancer.

Whole-genome sequencing of primary breast tumors enabled the identification of cancer driver genes and noncoding cancer driver plexuses from somatic mutations. However, differentiating driver from passenger events among noncoding genetic variants remains a challenge. Herein, we reveal cancer-driver cis-regulatory elements linked to transcription factors previously shown to be involved in development of luminal breast cancers by defining a tumor-enriched catalogue of approximately 100,000 unique cis-regulatory elements from 26 primary luminal estrogen receptor (ER)+ progesterone receptor (PR)+ breast tumors. Integrating this catalog with somatic mutations from 350 publicly available breast tumor whole genomes, we uncovered cancer driver cistromes, defined as the sum of binding sites for a transcription factor, for ten transcription factors in luminal breast cancer such as FOXA1 and ER, nine of which are essential for growth in breast cancer with four exclusive to the luminal subtype. Collectively, we present a strategy to find cancer driver cistromes relying on quantifying the enrichment of noncoding mutations over cis-regulatory elements concatenated into a functional unit. IMPLICATIONS: Mapping the accessible chromatin of luminal breast cancer led to discovery of an accumulation of mutations within cistromes of transcription factors essential to luminal breast cancer. This demonstrates coopting of regulatory networks to drive cancer and provides a framework to derive insight into the noncoding space of cancer.