Abstract Background/Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) stands as a major global cause of mortality. Various intervention strategies, such as pre-hospital care, reperfusion therapies, pharmacological interventions, dietary modifications, and exercise therapies, have been researched to improve patient prognosis (1,2). While reports suggest the efficacy of the Mediterranean diet, there remains a lack of evidence regarding the impact of nutritionist-led dietary guidance on the prognosis of AMI patients. Purpose This study aimed to elucidate whether nutritional guidance by nutritionists who have national qualifications would improve the mortality and the primary composite endpoint (including acute decompensated heart failure, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome) of patients following an acute myocardial infarction. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 446 consecutive AMI patients who underwent emergency coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions between September 1, 2015, and October 31, 2023. Patients meeting the universal definition of myocardial infarction were included (3). After excluding 37 in-hospital deaths, evaluations for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and composite endpoints were performed during follow-up in 409 patients. Nutritionists guided 223 patients (54.5%) during hospitalization in this study. The nutritional guidance used in our study was also based on the definition of adequate caloric intake of 25–30 kcal per ideal body weight (kg). Under an appropriate total energy intake, a fat energy ratio of 20–25% and a carbohydrate energy ratio of 50–60% are recommended, with protein and lipid restrictions depending on the disease state. Results During a median follow-up of 39 months, 24 cases of all-cause mortality (5.9%) and 6 cases of cardiovascular mortality (1.5%) were recorded. Additionally, 15 cases of nonfatal stroke (3.7%), 17 cases of nonfatal acute coronary syndrome (4.2%), and 20 cases of hospitalizations for acute decompensated heart failure (4.9%) were observed. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated significantly higher incidence rates of death and primary composite endpoints among patients without nutritional guidance. The multivariate Cox regression model incorporated all variables exhibiting statistically significant associations with long-term mortality, and the primary composite endpoints. The multivariate Cox regression model revealed nutritional guidance as a significant predictor for long-term mortality but not for primary composite endpoints. Conclusion Nutritional guidance for AMI patients may improve overall mortality. Further research is warranted to explore the physiological impacts of improved diets resulting from such guidance and their effects on enhancing prognosis.