IBM Watson Health Research Articles

Lateral Ankle Ligament Repair Is Not Only for Young Patients: Trends in Incidence and Demographics.

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in annual incidence and patient population undergoing lateral ankle ligament repair (LALR) for the surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability. The IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database was queried for patients who underwent LALR from January 2009 to December 2019 based on CPT code 27698. Volume and incidence per 100 000 population were determined for annual sums, gender, age, and geographical regions based on population estimates from the United States Census Bureau. Future annual volumes were statistically projected with linear regression modeling to the year 2032. Overall, 160 457 LALR procedures were identified in the database from 2009 to 2019. Annual incidence increased 76.6% from 3.46 to 6.11 cases per 100 000 population, while estimates of annual volumes are projected to increase 61.5% from 19 829 to 32 033 procedures to the year 2032. Interestingly, the greatest increase in incidence was observed among patients above 70 years old, which might suggest older patients are staying active longer and desiring elective procedures to maintain their activity levels. As the incidence of LALR increases in older patients, more research will be needed to understand the unique surgical considerations and risk factors impacting patient-reported outcomes.Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Effect of telemedicine use on medical spending and health care utilization among patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BackgroundWe sought to assess the impact of telemedicine on healthcare utilization and medical expenditures among patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed GI cancer from 2013 to 2020 were identified from the IBM MarketScan database (IBM Watson Health) . Healthcare utilization, total medical outpatient insurance payments within 1 year post-diagnosis, and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses among telemedicine users and non-users were assessed after propensity score matching (PSM). ResultsAmong the 32,677 patients with GI cancer (esophageal, n = 1862, 5.7%; gastric, n = 2009, 6.1%; liver, n = 2929, 9.0%; bile duct, n = 597, 1.8%; pancreas, n = 3083, 9.4%; colorectal, n = 22,197, 67.9%), a total of 3063 (9.7%) utilized telemedicine. After PSM (telemedicine users, n = 3064; non-users, n = 3064), telemedicine users demonstrated a higher frequency of clinic visits (median: 5.0 days, IQR 4.0–7.0 vs non-users: 2.0 days, IQR 2.0–3.0, P < .001) and fewer potential days missed from daily activities (median: 7.5 days, IQR 4.5–12.5 vs non-users: 8.5 days, IQR 5.5–13.5, P < .001). Total medical spending per month and utilization of emergency room (ER) visits for telemedicine users were higher vs non-users (median: $10,658, IQR $5112–$18,528 vs non-users: $10,103, IQR $4628–$16,750; 46.8% vs 42.6%, both P < .01), whereas monthly OOP costs were comparable (median: $273, IQR $137–$449 for telemedicine users vs non-users: $268, IQR $142–$434, P = .625). ConclusionTelemedicine utilization was associated with increased outpatient clinic visits yet reduced potential days missed from daily activities among patients with GI cancer. Telemedicine users tended to have more ER visits and total medical spending per month, although monthly OOP costs were comparable with non-users.

Is popularity of total elbow arthroplasty in the United States decreasing? An analysis of trends, demographics, and indications

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an effective surgical intervention that can be used in the treatment of elbow pathologies including osteoarthritis (OA), complex distal humerus fractures, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is a paucity of literature assessing trends in the utilization of TEA. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in TEA utilization in the United States (U.S.) from 2010 to2018. A query of the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database was performed to identify patients that underwent TEA from 2010 to 2018 using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease coding. Patients were stratified based on surgical indication into the following groups: distal humerus fracture/post-traumatic sequelae, RA, OA, and other. Population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau were used to estimate the annual incidence and procedural trends of primary TEA for each surgical indication. Further stratification evaluated TEA trends based on sex, age, and geographic region. A total of 6522 primary TEAs were performed between 2010 and 2018. The total annual volume of TEAs performed from the start to the end of this time period decreased by 33%, from 694 to 466 cases. Overall, the majority (53.9%, n= 3514) of all TEAs from 2010 to 2018 were performed to treat distal humerus fractures/post-traumatic sequelae, while 22.3% (n= 1457) were performed for RA, 10.8% (n= 702) for OA, and 13.0% (n= 849) for other. Volume and incidence of TEA decreased over time from 2010 to 2018 regardless of surgical indication, sex, and age. The greatest decreases in volume and incidence in TEAs during the study period was observed for RA (58% and 60%, respectively). The smallest change in volume and incidence of TEA was observed for OA, with a 9% decrease in volume from 57 to 52 cases and 14% decrease in incidence from 0.19 to 0.16 per 1,000,000 people. The incidence and volume of primary TEAs in the U.S. decreased from 2010 to 2018, regardless of surgical indication, sex, and age. The most common indication for TEA is distal humerus fractures and traumatic sequelae, and RA is now a much less common indication than it was in the past. Understanding the national trends of TEA utilization allows us to visualize changes in practice over time to highlight preferences in the treatment of various elbow pathologies.

Getting what you pay for: impact of copayments on physical therapy and opioid initiation, timing, and continuation for newly diagnosed low back pain

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPhysical therapy (PT) is an important component of low back pain (LBP) management. Despite established guidelines, heterogeneity in medical management remains common. PURPOSEWe sought to understand how copayments impact timing and utilization of PT in newly diagnosed LBP. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGThe IBM Watson Health MarketScan claims database was used in a longitudinal setting. PATIENT SAMPLEAdult patients with LBP. OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcomes-of-interest were timing and overall utilization of PT services. Additional outcomes-of-interest included timing of opioid prescribing. METHODSActual and inferred copayments based on nonnonprimary care provider visit claims were used to evaluate the relationship between PT copayment and incidence of PT initiation. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate factors influencing PT usage. RESULTSOverall, 2,467,389 patients were included. PT initiation, among those with at ≥1 PT service during the year after LBP diagnosis (30.6%), occurred at a median of 8 days postdiagnosis (IQR 1–55). Among those with at least one PT encounter, incidence of subsequent PT visits was significantly lower for those with high initial PT copayments. High initial PT copayments, while inversely correlated with PT utilization, were directly correlated with subsequent opioid use (0.77 prescriptions/patient [$0 PT copayment] versus 1.07 prescriptions/patient [$50–74 PT copayment]; 1.15 prescriptions/patient [$75+ PT copayment]). Among patients with known opioid and PT copayments, higher PT copayments were correlated with faster opioid use while higher opioid copayments were correlated with faster PT use (Spearman p<.05). For multivariable whole-cohort analyses, incidence of PT initiation among patients with inferred copayments in the 50–75th and 75–100th percentiles was significantly lower than those below the 50th percentile (HR=0.893 [95%CI 0.887–0.899] and HR=0.905 [95%CI 0.899–0.912], respectively). CONCLUSIONSHigher PT copayments correlated with reduced PT utilization; higher PT copayments and lower opioid copayments were independent contributors to delayed PT initiation and higher opioid use. In patients covered by plans charging high PT copayments, opioid use was significantly higher. Copays may impact long-term adherence to PT.

Association between systemic lupus erythematosus and myasthenia gravis: A population-based National Study

BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and myasthenia gravis (MG) are autoimmune diseases. Previous case reports and case series suggest an association may exist between these diseases, as well as an increased risk of SLE after thymectomy for MG. We undertook this study to determine whether SLE and MG were associated in large cohorts. MethodsWe searched the IBM Watson Health Explorys platform and the Department of Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program (MVP) database for diagnoses of SLE and MG. In addition, we examined subjects enrolled in the Lupus Family Registry and Repository (LFRR) as well as controls for a diagnosis of MG. ResultsAmong 59,780,210 individuals captured in Explorys, there were 25,750 with MG and 65,370 with SLE. 370 subjects had both. Those with MG were >10 times more likely to have SLE than those without MG. Those with both diseases were more likely to be women, African American, and at a younger age than MG subjects without SLE. In addition, the MG patients who underwent thymectomy had an increased risk of SLE compared to MG patients who had not undergone thymectomy (OR 3.11, 95% CI: 2.12 to 4.55). Autoimmune diseases such as pernicious anemia and miscellaneous comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease were significantly more common in MG patients who developed SLE. In the MVP, SLE and MG were also significantly associated. Association of SLE and MG in a large SLE cohort with rigorous SLE classification confirmed the association of SLE with MG at a similar level. ConclusionWhile the number of patients with both MG and SLE is small, SLE and MG are strongly associated together in very large databases and a large SLE cohort.

Artificial intelligence in urologic oncology: the actual clinical practice results of IBM Watson for Oncology in South Korea

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is changing our life, including the medical field. Repeated machine learning using big data made various fields more predictable and accurate. In medicine, IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO), trained by Memorial Slone Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), was first introduced and applied in 14 countries worldwide.Our study was designed to assess the feasibility of WFO in actual clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the concordance rate between WFO and multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) in Urologic cancer patients. Materials and methodsWe reviewed retrospectively collected data for consecutive patients who underwent WFO and MTB simultaneously in the diagnosis of urologic malignancy before determining further treatment between August 2017 and September 2020. We compared the recommendation of the AI system, WFO (IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA), with the opinion of MTB for further managing all patients diagnosed with urologic malignancies such as prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer. ResultsA total of 55 patients were enrolled in our study. The number of patients with prostate cancer was 48. The number of bladder and kidney cancer patients was 5 and 2, respectively. The overall concordance rate between WFO and MTB was 92.7%. Three patients could not suggest proper treatment options using WFO, and the recommended choice of WFO was not feasible in the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. ConclusionsThe decision of WFO showed a high concordance rate with a multidisciplinary tumor board for urologic oncology. However, some recommendations of WFO were not feasible in actual practice, and WFO still has some points to improve and modify. Interestingly, applying WFO is likely to facilitate a multidisciplinary team approach.

Clinical and economic characterization of mild, moderate, and severe systemic lupus erythematosus: Real-world observation across payer channels in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting as many as 322,000 people in the United States. Because of heterogeneity in both disease course and clinical manifestations, it is critical to identify a prevalent SLE population that includes patients with moderate or severe disease. Additionally, differences in the clinical and economic burden of SLE may exist across payer channels, yet to date this has not been reported in any previous studies. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical and economic burden of SLE across disease severity and payer channels. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients from Merative MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid databases from 2013 to 2020 (Commercial/Medicare) or 2013 to 2019 (Medicaid), with at least 1 inpatient or at least 2 outpatient SLE claims and no invalid steroid claims. The index date was a random SLE claim with at least 12 months of disease history. Patients were continuously enrolled 1 year pre-index (baseline) and 1 year post-index and classified with mild, moderate, or severe disease using a published algorithm. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, flares, and utilization/costs were compared across disease severity. RESULTS: 22,385 Commercial, 2,035 Medicare, and 8,083 Medicaid patients had SLE. Most Medicaid patients (51.1%) had severe disease. Comorbidity scores increased with disease severity (P < 0.001). 30.7% of Commercial, 34.1% Medicare, and 51.3% Medicaid patients had opioids, which increased with disease severity (P < 0.001). All-cause costs ranged from 1.8- to 2.3-fold for moderate vs mild and 4.2- to 6.5-fold for severe vs mild. Outpatient medical costs accounted for the highest proportion of all-cause costs, except Medicaid patients with severe disease, for whom inpatient costs were highest. Mean (SD) SLE-related annual costs were $23,030 (43,304) vs $1,738 (4,427) in severe vs mild for Commercial, $12,264 (31,896) vs $2,024 (4,998) for Medicare, and $7,572 (27,719) vs $787 (3,797) for Medicaid (P < 0.001). For patients with severe disease in Medicaid, 16.5% and 60.1% had inpatient and emergency department (ED) visits, respectively, vs 10.3% and 26.5% Commercial vs 10.6% and 24.6% Medicare. Mean [SD] flares per year in the baseline period increased from 2.5 [1.7] in mild to 4.6 [1.9] in severe for Commercial, 3.2 [1.9] to 5.0 [2.1] for Medicare, and 2.0 [1.6] to 4.5 [2.0] for Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe SLE experienced more comorbidities, flares, and utilization/costs. Outpatient costs were the largest driver of all-cause costs for Commercial and Medicare (and Medicaid for mild to moderate SLE). Medicaid beneficiaries had the highest rate of severe SLE, highest use of ED and inpatient services, and highest oral corticosteroid and opioid use but the lowest utilization of disease-modifying treatments. Results demonstrate an unmet need in SLE treatment, especially among patients with moderate to severe disease or Medicaid coverage. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AstraZeneca. Drs Wu and Bryant are current employees of AstraZeneca and may own stock and/or options. At the time of the study, Ms Perry and Mr Tkacz were employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from AstraZeneca to conduct this study.

Tramadol use before total shoulder arthroplasty: patients have lower risk of complications and resource utilization than those using traditional opioids

Evidence continues to mount for the deleterious effects of preoperative opioid use in the setting of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Tramadol, a synthetic opioid with concomitant neurotransmitter effects, has become a popular alternative to traditional opioids, but it has not been well studied in the preoperative setting of TSA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate postsurgical outcomes in TSA for patients with preoperative tramadol use compared to patients using traditional opioids and those who were opioid naïve. Utilizing the IBM Watson Health Marketscan databases, a retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing TSA from 2009-2018. Filled pain prescriptions were collected and prescribing trends were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between four patient cohorts defined by preoperative analgesia use-opioid naïve, tramadol, traditional opioids, and combination (opioids and tramadol). Multivariate analysis was used to account for small variations in cohort demographics and comorbidities. Analysis focused on resource utilization and complications. Revision rates at 1- and 3-years postoperative were also compared. 29,454 TSA patients were studied, with 8,959 available for 3-year postoperative follow-up. 10,462 (35.5%) were prescribed traditional opioids and 2,214 (7.5%) tramadol only. From 2009-2018, prescribing trends in the United States demonstrated a significant decrease in the number of patients prescribed preoperative narcotics, whereas patients prescribed preoperative tramadol and those who were opioid naïve significantly increased. Compared to opioid naïve patients, the traditional opioid cohort had significantly increased odds of resource utilization and complications, whereas the tramadol cohort did not. Specifically, the traditional opioid cohort had an increased risk of prosthetic joint infection compared to both opioid naïve and tramadol cohorts. The traditional opioid cohort had higher revision rates than opioid naïve patients at 1- and 3-years, whereas the tramadol cohort did not. Despite a decrease in opioid prescriptions over the study period, many patients in the United States remain on opioids. While tramadol is not without its own risks, our results suggest that patients taking preoperative tramadol as an alternative to traditional opioids for glenohumeral arthritic pain had a lesser postoperative risk profile, comparable to opioid naïve patients.

Arthroscopic Procedures Are Performed in 5% of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis 1 Year Preceding Total Knee Arthroplasty and Are Associated With Increased Stiffness and Increased Costs

To describe the different types of arthroscopic procedures that patients undergo in the year prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), reveal the cost associated with these procedures, and understand the relationship between preoperative arthroscopy and clinical outcomes after TKA. An observational cohort study was conducted using the IBM Watson Health MarketScan databases. Patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral isolated primary TKA between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019, were included. Knee arthroscopic procedures performed in the 1-year period before a primary TKA was identified. The primary outcomes of interest were cost of these procedures and the risk of 90-day postoperative complications. In total, 2,904 patients, representing 5.2% of the analyzed cohort, underwent arthroscopic procedures in the year prior to TKA. The most common procedure and diagnosis were meniscectomy and meniscal tear, respectively, with procedures performed an average of 7.2 ± 3.0 months before TKA. Average per patient costs were $9,716 ± $5,500 in the highest payment quartile vs $1,789 ± 636 in the lowest payment quartile. Patients with a history of arthroscopy were more likely to develop postoperative stiffness (P= .001), while no difference was found in the risk of 90-day periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Of the patients, 5.2% underwent knee arthroscopy in the year prior to TKA. While no association was seen with PJI risk, the costs associated with these procedures are high and may increase the overall cost of management of knee osteoarthritis. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Patterns of cervical cancer screening follow-up in the era of prolonged screening intervals

IntroductionLittle is known as to how prolonged screening recommendations for cervical cancer have affected compliance. ObjectiveWe examined compliance with repeat cervical cancer screening among U.S. women aged 30–64 who underwent index screening between 2013 and 2019. Study designThe IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database was used to identify commercially-insured women 30–64 years old who underwent cervical cancer screening from 2013 to 2019. The cohort was limited to women with continuous insurance 12 months before and ≥ 2 months after index testing. Patients with prior hysterectomy, more frequent surveillance needs, or a history of abnormal cytology, histology, or HPV test were excluded. Index screening included cytology, co-testing, or primary HPV testing. Cumulative incidence curves described screening intervals. Compliance was considered if repeat screening occurred 2.5–4 years after index cytology and 4.5–6 years after index co-testing. Cause-specific hazard models examined factors associated with compliance. ResultsOf 5,368,713 patients identified, co-testing was performed in 2,873,070 (53.5%), cytology in 2,422,480 (45.1%), and primary HPV testing in 73,163 (1.4%). The cumulative incidence of repeat screening among all women by seven years was 81.9%. Of those who underwent repeat screening, 85.7% with index cytology and 96.6% with index co-testing were rescreened early. Only, 12.2% with index cytology had appropriate rescreening and 2.1% had delayed rescreening. Among the index co-testing group, 3.2% had appropriate rescreening and 0.3% had delayed rescreening. ConclusionAppropriate cervical cancer follow-up screening is highly variable. The cumulative incidence rate of repeat screening was 81.9% and among women rescreened, the vast majority are tested earlier than recommended by current guidelines.

Performance of a Web-Based Reference Database With Natural Language Searching Capabilities: Usability Evaluation of DynaMed and Micromedex With Watson

Evidence-based point-of-care information (POCI) tools can facilitate patient safety and care by helping clinicians to answer disease state and drug information questions in less time and with less effort. However, these tools may also be visually challenging to navigate or lack the comprehensiveness needed to sufficiently address a medical issue. This study aimed to collect clinicians' feedback and directly observe their use of the combined POCI tool DynaMed and Micromedex with Watson, now known as DynaMedex. EBSCO partnered with IBM Watson Health, now known as Merative, to develop the combined tool as a resource for clinicians. We aimed to identify areas for refinement based on participant feedback and examine participant perceptions to inform further development. Participants (N=43) within varying clinical roles and specialties were recruited from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, United States, between August 10, 2021, and December 16, 2021, to take part in usability sessions aimed at evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of, as well as satisfaction with, the DynaMed and Micromedex with Watson tool. Usability testing methods, including think aloud and observations of user behavior, were used to identify challenges regarding the combined tool. Data collection included measurements of time on task; task ease; satisfaction with the answer; posttest feedback on likes, dislikes, and perceived reliability of the tool; and interest in recommending the tool to a colleague. On a 7-point Likert scale, pharmacists rated ease (mean 5.98, SD 1.38) and satisfaction (mean 6.31, SD 1.34) with the combined POCI tool higher than the physicians, nurse practitioner, and physician's assistants (ease: mean 5.57, SD 1.64, and satisfaction: mean 5.82, SD 1.60). Pharmacists spent longer (mean 2 minutes, 26 seconds, SD 1 minute, 41 seconds) on average finding an answer to their question than the physicians, nurse practitioner, and physician's assistants (mean 1 minute, 40 seconds, SD 1 minute, 23 seconds). Overall, the tool performed well, but this usability evaluation identified multiple opportunities for improvement that would help inexperienced users.

Comparing the burden of illness in patients with alopecia areata vs atopic dermatitis in the US population from a payer perspective.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by nonscarring hair loss. AA frequently co-occurs with other inflammatory autoimmune conditions, presenting a significant clinical burden. OBJECTIVE: To compare the burden of illness, direct and indirect costs in adult patients with AA vs atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used US administrative claims data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database to compare commercially insured adults with AA to those with AD. Patients with an AA diagnosis between January 2017 and September 2019 were propensity score matched to patients with AD. Comorbidity burden, medication use, health care resource utilization, health care costs, and indirect costs during a 12-month follow-up period were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 25,446 adult patients with AA were selected for the matched analysis with the AD cohort. Patients with AA generally had lower comorbidity burden than patients with AD; mean Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were 0.36 (SD = 0.99) and 0.39 (SD = 0.92), for AA and AD, respectively (P = 0.007). Patients with AA had significantly lower proportions of allergic rhinitis, asthma, pruritus, skin infections, and urticaria, but higher proportions of thyroid disease, when compared with patients with AD (all P < 0.001). A smaller proportion of patients with AA had prescriptions for topical (45.3% vs 64.8%; P < 0.001) and oral (20.3% vs 29.6%; P < 0.001) corticosteroids and antianxiety and/or antidepressants (24.7% vs 29.7%; P < 0.001), but a significantly larger proportion for intralesional corticosteroids (triamcinolone) (49.6% vs 21.7%; P < 0.001), compared with patients with AD. Despite a lower comorbidity burden and generally less medication usage in patients with AA, total all-cause health care costs did not significantly differ between the AA and AD cohorts ($10,705 vs $10,816; P = 0.712), and outpatient costs were higher in patients with AA ($6,297 vs $5,859; P = 0.014). Female patients with AA had significantly greater costs for both outpatient and outpatient pharmacy when compared with female patients with AD. Patients with AA were more likely to have a claim for long-term disability (0.6% vs 0.3%; P = 0.001) and higher long-term disability-associated indirect costs ($73 [SD = $1,442] vs $25 [SD = $774]; P = 0.004) compared with patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar total health care costs in patients with AA and AD, despite a lower proportion of comorbidities and prescription use in patients with AA. Outpatient costs were also significantly higher overall in patients with AA. Although often dismissed as a cosmetic condition, AA, an autoimmune disease, has a similar level of medical expenditure as AD. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Mr Fenske and Drs Ding, Morrow, and Smith are employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Drs Manjelievskaia, Moynihan, and Silver are employed by Merative. Drs Manjelievskaia, Moynihan, and Silver were employed by IBM Watson Health at the time of study completion. IBM Watson Health received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study.

645 Getting What You Pay For: Impact of Copayments on Physical Therapy Initiation, Timing, and Continuation for Acute-Onset Low Back Pain

INTRODUCTION: Physical therapy (PT) is an important component of acute low back pain (LBP) management. Despite established guidelines, heterogeneity in medical management remains common. METHODS: The IBM Watson Health MarketScan claims database was queried for adult patients with new-onset idiopathic LBP. The primary outcomes-of-interest were timing and overall utilization of PT services. Additional outcomes-of-interest included timing of opioid prescribing. Actual and inferred copayments based on specialist visit claims were used to evaluate the relationship between PT copayment and incidence of PT initiation. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate factors influencing PT usage. RESULTS: Overall, 2,467,389 patients were included. PT initiation, among those with at ≥1 PT service during the year after LBP diagnosis (30.6%), occurred at a median of 8 days post-diagnosis (IQR 1-55). Among those with at least one PT encounter, incidence of subsequent PT visits was significantly lower for those with high initial PT copayments. High initial PT copayments, while inversely correlated with PT utilization, were directly correlated with subsequent opioid use. High PT copayments affected relative timing of PT and opioid initiation, with every $10 increase associated with a delay in PT initiation of 3.06 days (95%CI 2.76-3.36) and an advancement of opioid prescription by 2.58 days (95%CI 2.24-2.92). For multivariable whole-cohort analyses, incidence of PT initiation among patients with inferred copayments in the 50-75th and 75th-100th percentiles was significantly lower than those below the 50th percentile (HR = 0.893 [95% CI 0.887-0.899] and HR=0.905 [95% CI 0.899-0.912], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Higher PT copayments correlated with reduced PT utilization; higher PT copayments and lower opioid copayments were independent contributors to delayed PT initiation and higher opioid use. In patients covered by plans charging high PT copayments, opioid use was significantly higher. Co-pays impact long-term adherence to PT.

Comparison of Real-World Costs, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Comorbidity-Related Costs Between Ixekizumab and Secukinumab Among Biologic-Experienced Patients with Psoriasis Over 18 Months in the USA.

Data on real-world healthcare costs for ixekizumab (IXE) and secukinumab (SEC) in biologic-experienced patients with psoriasis are limited. This study compared real-world costs and healthcare resource utilization between IXE and SEC in biologic-experienced patients with psoriasis over an 18-month follow-up period in the USA. Adult patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis between 1 March, 2015 and 31 October, 2019 were identified using health insurance claims data from IBM Watson Health MarketScan®. The index date was the date of the first IXE or SEC claim. Biologic-experienced patients with one or more pre-period claims for biologic drugs were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to reduce cohort imbalances. All-cause and psoriasis-related direct healthcare costs along with index drug costs were estimated during the follow-up and reported as per patient per month. Discount factors published by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review were applied to psoriasis-related biologics to adjust pharmacy costs. A total of 411 IXE and 780 SEC users were included. After weighting, all-cause inpatient admissions were similar between IXE (9.5%) and SEC users (10.3%). Weighted, mean ± standard deviation per patient per month all-cause healthcare costs were higher in IXE users ($6670 ± $2910) than in SEC users ($6239 ± $3903; p = 0.049). Psoriasis-related and monthly index drug costs were higher in IXE users ($5609 ± $2009; p < 0.001 and $4688 ± $1994; p < 0.001, respectively) than in SEC users ($5095 ± $2291 and $3853 ± $1977, respectively). After Institute for Clinical and Economic Review adjustment, mean per patient per month all-cause ($4363 ± $2576 vs $4398 ± $3517) and psoriasis-related costs ($3302 ± $1264 vs $3253 ± $1504) were similar between the groups. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review- and adherence-adjusted mean per patient per month index drug costs were similar between IXE and SEC users (p = 0.339). Institute for Clinical and Economic Review-adjusted all-cause and psoriasis-related costs were comparable between IXE and SEC users among biologic-experienced patients over an 18-month follow-up period.

Early costs and complications of first-line low-grade glioma treatment using a large national database: Limitations and future perspectives.

Diffuse Low-grade gliomas (DLGG, WHO Grade II) are a heterogenous group of tumors comprising 13-16% of glial tumors. While maximal safe resection is endorsed as the best approach to DLGG, compared to more conservative interventions like stereotactic biopsy, the added costs and risks have not been systematically evaluated. The purpose of this study was to better understand the complication rates and costs associated with each intervention. A retrospective cohort study using data from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database was conducted, using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes corresponding to DLGG (2005-2014). Current Procedure Terminology, 4th Edition (CPT-4) codes were used to differentiate resection and biopsy cohorts. Inverse weighting by the propensity score was used to balance baseline potential confounders (age, sex, pre-op seizure, geographic region, year, Charleston Comorbidity Index). Complication rates, hospital mortality, readmission, and costs were compared between groups. We identified 5,784 and 3,635 patients undergoing resection and biopsy, respectively, for initial DLGG management. Resection was associated with greater 30-day complications (29.17% vs. 26.34%; p < 0.05). However, this association became non-significant after inverse propensity weighting (adjusted odds ratio = 1.09; 0.98-1.20). There was no statistically significant difference in unadjusted, 30-day hospital mortality (p = 0.06) or re-admission (p = 0.52). Resection was associated with higher 90-day total costs (p < 0.0001) and drug costs (p < 0.0001). Biopsy was associated with greater index procedure costs (p < 0.0001). Long-term outcomes and evaluation of DLGG subtypes was not possible given limitations in the metrics recorded in MarketScan and lack of specificity in the ICD coding system. Resection was not associated with an increase in the adjusted complication rate after balancing for baseline prognostic factors. Total costs and drug costs were higher with resection of DLGG, but the index procedure costs were higher for biopsy. This data should help to facilitate prospective health economic analyses in the future to understand the cost-effectiveness, and impact on quality of life, for DLGG interventions. However, the use of large national databases for studying long-term outcomes in DLGG management should be discouraged until there is greater specificity in the ICD coding system for DLGG subtypes.

2163. RSV-related hospitalization and outpatient palivizumab use in very preterm (born at &amp;lt; 29 wGA) infants: 2003-2020

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in children under one year and the leading cause of infant hospitalization. Palivizumab was approved by the FDA in 1998 as RSV immunoprophylaxis (RSV-IP) to prevent severe RSV disease in children with specific health conditions and those born at &amp;lt; 35 weeks gestational age (wGA). Though RSV-IP recommendations have changed over time, RSV-IP has been consistently recommended in very preterm infants (&amp;lt; 29 wGA) since palivizumab approval. This study's objective is to compare RSV-related hospitalization (RSVH) and RSVH characteristics in very preterm and term ( &amp;gt; 37 wGA) infants. Methods Using the MarketScan Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid administrative claims databases, very preterm and term infants born between 7/1/2003 and 6/30/2020 were identified and classified as very preterm or term using diagnosis codes. Infants with evidence of health conditions such as congenital heart disease and cystic fibrosis were excluded. During 2003-2020 RSV seasons (November to March), claims incurred by infants while they were &amp;lt; 12 months old were evaluated for outpatient administration of palivizumab and RSVH. RSVH was identified in infants with an inpatient claim with an RSV diagnosis. Rate of RSVH during the first 12 months of life was calculated and compared in very preterm and term infants; the proportion of very preterm infants with an outpatient administration of palivizumab was also calculated. Results The study included 40,123 very preterm infants and 4,421,942 term infants. Rate of RSVH in very preterm infants ranged 1.5-3.8 per 100 infant seasons in Commercially insured infants and 3.5-8.4 in Medicaid insured infants. Relative risk of RSVH in very preterm was 3-4 times higher than term infants and was inversely related to wGA at birth (Figure 1). ICU admissions and mechanical ventilation were more common during RSVH in very preterm infants (Table 1); these outcomes were less common in very preterm infants with outpatient palivizumab administration (Table 2). Figure 1.Relative risk of RSVH in very preterm vs. term infantsTable 1.RSVH characteristics of term and very preterm infants by payerTable 2.RSVH characteristics of very preterm infants by palivizumab use and payer Conclusion Rates of RSVH are significantly higher and RSVH is more severe in very preterm infants than in term infants. Among very preterm infants, RSVH was less severe in infants with outpatient palivizumab administration. Disclosures Elizabeth Packnett, MPH, IBM Watson Health: Employee|Sobi: Contracted IBM Watson Health to conduct the study. Isabelle Winer, MPH, IBM Watson Health: employee|Sobi: contracted IBM Watson Health to conduct study David R. Diakun, BS, Sanofi: Employed by IBM Watson Health which was contracted by Sanofi to perfom outcomes research|Sobi: Employed by IBM Watson Health which was contracted by Sobi to conduct the study Abiola Oladapo, PhD, Sobi Inc: Employee Tara L. Gonzales, MD, Sobi, NA: Employee Matthew Wojdyla, PharmD, Sobi: Employee.

2198. Healthcare Utilization During Acute Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Episodes among Infants in the United States

Abstract Background Healthcare utilization during acute medically attended (MA) RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) episodes remains poorly characterized, particularly among term infants without comorbidities. Describing the care incurred during these episodes may provide important information regarding the impact of MA RSV LRTI. Objective: Estimate the occurrence and average number of outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient visits during infants' first RSV season. Methods Using deidentified insurance claims data (MarketScan Commercial ®, MSC; MarketScan Medicaid ®, MSM; Optum Clinformatics ®, OC), we assembled a cohort of infants born in the United States between April 1, 2016 and February 29, 2020 and identified their first MA RSV LRTI episode during their first RSV season. We defined an RSV episode as the 7 days following an index RSV diagnosis (inclusive of the diagnosis date), allowing for two alternative definitions of the index diagnosis—a specific definition, based on ICD-10 codes explicitly indicating RSV, and a sensitive definition, including codes for unspecified bronchiolitis. We calculated the average number of outpatient, ED, and inpatient visits during this episode, stratifying estimates by gestational age and the presence/absence of comorbidities. We also calculated the proportion of episodes involving a given place of service. Results Using the specific (sensitive) definitions, infants averaged 1.11 (1.19), 0.90 (0.89), and 1.56 (1.39) outpatient visits during their first acute RSV episode, in the MSC, MSM, and OC datasets, respectively (Table). They averaged 0.35 (0.23), 0.51 (0.47), and 0.39 (0.23) visits to the ED and 0.28 (0.14), 0.25 (0.14), and 0.23 (0.11) inpatient stays. While MA RSV LRTI episodes among infants who were preterm and/or had other comorbidities (comorbidity groups B and C) were more likely to involve an ED or inpatient visit, up to 21% (10%) of episodes among otherwise healthy term infants involved an inpatient stay. Conclusion Up to 1 in 5 infants experiencing an MA RSV LRTI episode during their first RSV season visited an inpatient setting, including between 9% and 21% of otherwise healthy term infants. This study was funded by Sanofi and AstraZeneca. Disclosures Jason Gantenberg, PhD, MPH, Sanofi: Grant/Research Support Robertus van Aalst, PhD, MSc, Sanofi: Stocks/Bonds David R. Diakun, BS, Sanofi: Employed by IBM Watson Health which was contracted by Sanofi to perfom outcomes research|Sobi: Employed by IBM Watson Health which was contracted by Sobi to conduct the study Christopher B. Nelson, PhD MPH, Sanofi: employee|Sanofi: Stocks/Bonds David A. Savitz, PhD, Sanofi-Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi-Pasteur: Honoraria Andrew R. Zullo, PharmD, PhD, Sanofi: Grant/Research Support.

2145. Economic Burden of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in Commercially- and Medicaid-insured Patients in the United States

Abstract Background Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the leading infectious cause of congenital birth defects. Approximately 20-25% of infants born with cCMV develop long-term health complications such as hearing loss, developmental issues, and microcephaly. Despite this, studies on the economic burden of cCMV are limited. The aim of this study is to assess the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost burden among a sample of cCMV patients in the US using insurance claims data. Methods This retrospective study utilized IBM Watson Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Multi-State Medicaid data from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019. Separately for each payer population, patients were included in the cCMV cohort if their first diagnosis (index date) of cCMV (ICD-9: 771.1; ICD-10: P35.1) or CMV (ICD-9: 78.5; ICD-10: B25.x) was within 1 month of birth. The index date for non-cCMV controls was selected at random from all medical claims within 1 month of birth. cCMV patients were matched 1:1 to controls on demographics, insurance type, birth year, and index year. All patients were required to have ≥ 1 year of continuous health plan enrollment post-index (study period). HRU and costs in 2021 USD ($) were summarized over the study period. Costs for birth admissions were also described. Results 195 Commercial and 549 Medicaid matched pairs were included in the analyses. Mean ± SD age at first diagnosis was 8.4 ± 8.6 days and 5.9 ± 7.8 days for Commercial and Medicaid cases, respectively. Mean birth length of stay for Commercial and Medicaid cases was 24 days (vs. 5 for controls), with mean birth admission costs of $149,192 (vs. $17,996) and $49,885 (vs. $5,052), respectively. On average, cCMV patients had higher study period HRU and costs compared to controls (Table 1). Excess costs due to cCMV were estimated at $33,223 for Commercial and $9,748 for Medicaid. Conclusion cCMV patients have substantial HRU and costs during the 1-year post-diagnosis. While the majority of patients did not require hospitalization, inpatient care contributed substantially to the overall cost burden. Future studies should evaluate longer-term costs beyond the first year as well as the reasons underlying the high economic burden among cCMV patients. Disclosures John D. Diaz-Decaro, PhD, MS, Moderna, Inc.: Salary|Moderna, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Gail J. Demmler-Harrison, MD, Elsevier: Book royalties|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Microgen: Advisor/Consultant|Microgen: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate Wolters Kluwer Health: Royalties Jessica R. Marden, ScD, MPH, Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Annika Anderson, MPH, Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Sandeep Basnet, MD, Moderna, Inc.: Salary|Moderna, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Katherine Gaburo, n/a, Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Danielle Peterson, n/a, Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Kosuke Kawai, ScD, MS, Moderna, Inc.: Salary|Moderna, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Noam Kirson, PhD, Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Urvi Desai, PhD, Moderna, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Philip Buck, PhD, MPH, Moderna, Inc.: Salary|Moderna, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds.

Prompt initiation of triple therapy following hospitalization for a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation in the United States: An analysis of the PRIMUS study.

BACKGROUND: Severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization contribute a substantial portion of the morbidity and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting β-agonist + long-acting muscarinic antagonist) is a recommended option for patients who experience recurrent COPD exacerbations or persistent symptoms. Few real-world studies have specifically examined the effect of prompt initiation of triple therapy, specifically among patients hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prompt initiation of triple therapy following a severe COPD exacerbation was associated with lower risk of subsequent exacerbations and lower health care use and costs and the effects of each 30-day delay of initiation. METHODS: Adults aged 40 years or older with COPD were identified in the Merative MarketScan Databases between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, and were required to meet the following criteria: open or closed triple therapy (date of first closed prescription or last component of open=index treatment date), more than 1 inpatient admission with a primary COPD diagnosis (ie, severe exacerbation) in the prior 12 months (index exacerbation), 12 months of continuous enrollment before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index exacerbation, and absence of select respiratory diseases and cancer. Patients were stratified based on timing of open or closed triple therapy after the index exacerbation: prompt (≤30 days), delayed (31-180 days), or very delayed (181-365 days). Multivariable regression controlled for baseline characteristics (age, sex, insurance type, index year, comorbidities, prior treatment, and prior exacerbations) and estimated the odds of subsequent exacerbations, change in the number of exacerbations, and change in health care costs during 12-month follow-up associated with each 30-day delay of triple therapy initiation. RESULTS: A total of 6,772 patients met inclusion criteria (2,968 [43.8%] prompt, 1,998 [29.5%] delayed, and 1,806 [26.7%] very delayed). The adjusted odds of any exacerbation and a severe exacerbation during 12-month follow-up increased by 13% (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.11-1.15]) and 10% (1.10 [1.08-1.12]), respectively, for each 30-day delay in triple therapy initiation, and the mean number of exacerbations increased by 5.4% (95% CI = 4.7%-6.1%). There was a 3.0% increase (95% CI = 2.2%-3.8%) in mean all-cause costs and a 3.7% increase (95% CI = 2.9%-4.6%) in total COPD-related costs for each 30-day delay of triple therapy initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Longer delays in triple therapy initiation after a COPD hospitalization result in greater risk of subsequent exacerbations and higher health care resource use and costs. Adequate post-discharge follow-up care and earlier consideration of triple therapy may improve clinical and economic outcomes among patients with COPD. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr Evans is employed by Merative, formerly IBM Watson Health, and Mr Tkacz was employed by IBM Watson Health at the time of this study; Merative/IBM Watson Health received funding from AstraZeneca to conduct this study. Mr Pollack, Dr Staresinic, Dr Feigler, and Dr Patel are employed by AstraZeneca. Dr Touchette, Dr Portillo, and Dr Strange are paid consultants to AstraZeneca. Dr Strange also participates in research grants paid to the Medical University of South Carolina by AstraZeneca, CSA Medical, and Nuvaira, and is a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, Morair, and PulManage regarding COPD.

Annual costs among patients with major depressive disorder and the impact of key clinical events.

BACKGROUND: The economic burden of major depressive disorder (MDD) is substantial and increasing; however, the impact of key clinical events (eg, hospitalization, suicide attempt/ideation, and treatment changes) on health care resource use and costs are less established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health care utilization and costs among patients with MDD, particularly for those with key clinical events. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, administrative health care claims from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database were used to identify adults with a new diagnosis of MDD (January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017). Patients with 12 months or more of continuous health care coverage before and after the initial medical claim with an MDD diagnosis (index date) and 1 or more pharmacy claims for an antidepressant within 60 days of any qualifying medical claim were included. The effect of post-index date key clinical events (eg, treatment changes, moderate to severe MDD, MDD-related emergency department [ED] visits, MDD-related hospitalizations, suicide attempt/ideation, severe mental health disorder, use of brain stimulation therapies) on all-cause total costs was assessed. Actual allcause costs were summarized descriptively and reported per patient per year (PPPY). Multivariable analyses compared differences in all-cause costs during follow-up, depending on whether patients experienced a key clinical event. RESULTS: A total of 455,082 patients met eligibility criteria. The average age was 41 years and 64% of patients were female. Mean (SD) all-cause PPPY costs during the follow-up period were $10,074 ($25,694). The most common key clinical events were treatment changes, moderate to severe MDD diagnosis, and MDD-related ED visits. The majority of patients (90.1%) experienced at least 1 treatment change, which was most commonly treatment discontinuation. Generally, mean costs for up to 90 days following an event were higher than those preceding the event. In multivariable analyses, patients with any key clinical events had 51% higher PPPY allcause health care costs compared with those who did not have any key clinical events. Compared with patients without key clinical events, follow-up costs were more than 2 times higher among patients with severe mental health disorder, MDD-related hospitalization, and suicide attempt/ideation. The most impactful key clinical event was treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, vagal nerve stimulation, or transcranial magnetic stimulation, in which patients incurred 4.3 times higher follow-up costs than those who did not receive one of these treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Key clinical events exacerbate health care resource use and costs among patients with MDD. Effective therapeutic regimens initiated optimally in the course of treatment may mitigate costly clinical events associated with MDD. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Allergan plc (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie). The sponsor was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and publication decisions. All authors met the ICMJE authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship. Dr Cutler is a consultant for AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Akili Interactive, Alfasigma, Alkermes, Allergan (now AbbVie), Avanir, BioXcel Therapeutics, BlackThorn Therapeutics, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Ironshore, Janssen, Karuna Therapeutics, Lundbeck, Neurocrine Biosciences, Noven, Otsuka, Sage Therapeutics, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Teva and Tris Pharma; has received speaker/promotional honoraria from AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alfasigma, Alkermes, Allergan, Avanir, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Ironshore, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurocrine Biosciences, Noven, Otsuka, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, and Tris Pharma; and has received research grants from Aevi Genomics, Akili Interactive, Alkermes, Allergan (now AbbVie), Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Biohaven, Ironshore, KemPharm, Lilly, Lundbeck, Neos Therapeutics, Novartis, Otsuka, Purdue Canada, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Takeda and Tris Pharma. Drs Keyloun and Gillard are AbbVie employees and may hold stock. Dr Higa was an employee of AbbVie at the time of the study and may hold stock. Ms Park is an employee of Merative, formerly IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Allergan (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie) to conduct this analysis. Dr Bonafede was an employee of IBM Watson Health, now Merative, which received funding from Allergan (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie) to conduct this analysis. Dr Jain has served as a consultant to Addrenex, Allergan (now AbbVie), Avanir, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neos Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, Shionogi, Shire, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, and Teva; has been a paid speaker for Addrenex, Alkermes, Allergan (now AbbVie), Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neos Therapeutics, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, Rhodes, Shionogi, Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, and Tris Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Allergan (now AbbVie), AstraZeneca, Lilly, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda; and has served on the advisory boards for Addrenex, Alkermes, Avanir, Forum, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neos Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, Shionogi, Shire, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, and Teva.