Hysterectomy For Cervical Cancer Research Articles

Nursing care in a patient with hysterectomy for cervical cancer

Introduction: Cervical cancer continues to be the leading cause of death worldwide for many women, this type of cancer does not start suddenly, but has a previous evolution from precursor or precancerous lesions, the diagnosis is made in advanced stages of the disease, decreasing or canceling the chances of curative treatment. It is expected that by the year 2032 there will be 21.4 million new patients dealing with this disease in the world. Objective: To develop specialized and individualized comprehensive nursing care in patients with cervical cancer, based on scientific evidence recommendations and interventions. We present the assessment of a post-operative hysterectomy patient for cervical cancer where the nursing care process is applied. Methodology: A clinical case study, a 44-year-old patient was selected for convenience, applying the methodology of the nursing care process, the assessment was made through the 11 functional patterns of Marjory Gordon, the data were obtained from the clinical history, interview and physical examination of the patient. The main human responses are identified to analyze objective and subjective data, clinical judgments are made to implement care plans under the NANDA, NOC, NIC taxonomy. Results: 7 altered patterns were identified; considering as main diagnosis: acute pain and risk of complication; hemorrhage. Nursing care plans were implemented according to the Area model. A change score of +1 and +2 was obtained, which subsequently improved with nursing care. Conclusions: after the surgical procedure; According to the altered patterns, the nursing care process was carried out, observing improvement in the altered patterns, however, the patient remained hospitalized to continue with the specialized therapeutic plans, this implies that the gynecological-obstetric service must have professionals in nursing specialized in this area.

Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: Patients’ Epidemiological and Clinical Profiles and Perioperative Outcome in Two Referral Hospitals in Cameroon

Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: Patients’ Epidemiological and Clinical Profiles and Perioperative Outcome in Two Referral Hospitals in Cameroon

Comparative study of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy and surgery in treating vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions following hysterectomy

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) and surgery in treating vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) after hysterectomy due to cervical cancer (CC) or precancerous lesions. MethodsA retrospective study was performed comprising 41 women with histologically confirmed vaginal HSIL after hysterectomy for CC or cervical HSIL. Patients were treated with surgery or ALA-PDT and were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months and then every six months afterwards. Clinical data were collected and the efficacy and safety of the two groups were analyzed. ResultsOf the 41 patients with vaginal HSIL after hysterectomy, 18 were treated with ALA-PDT and 23 underwent surgery. There was no significant difference in the lesions’ complete remission (CR) rate or the human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance rate between the ALA-PDT group and the surgery group (P > 0.05). In the surgery group, the clearance rate of HPV16/18 was higher than that of other high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) and HPV16/18 combined with other HR-HPV (87.50 % vs. 45.45 % vs. 0.00 %, P = 0.014). No significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups was noted (P > 0.05). And none of the patients progressed. In the surgery group, one patient developed significant thickening of the vaginal stump, and one patient had increased vaginal discharge. In women treated with ALA-PDT, there was no vaginal bleeding or harmful effects on the organizational structure or functions compared to the surgery group. ConclusionsThe efficacy of ALA-PDT was comparable to that of surgery in treating vaginal HSIL following hysterectomy due to CC or cervical HSIL, with fewer side effects.

A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IB3 and IIA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 3 trial

BackgroundCervical cancer is and will remain to be an important health problem in China, especially with an increasing proportion of younger patients who has more specific needs. In China, surgery to remove tumor burden followed by postoperative treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy based on clinicopathologic factors may be the best choice for stages IB3 and IIA2 patients. Radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer has been a classic landmark surgery in gynecology. The current trial is designed to evaluate whether there is a difference between laparoscopic RH and abdominal RH in cervical cancer (stages IB3 and IIA2) patient survival under stringent operation standards and consistent surgical oncologic principles. This paper reports the rationale, design, and implementation of the trial.Methods/designThis is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial. A total of 1104 patients with stage IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer will be enrolled over a period of 3 years. Patients are randomized (1:1) to either the laparoscopic RH or the abdominal RH group. Patients will then be followed up for at least 5 years. The primary end point will be 5-year overall survival, and secondary endpoints include 5-year progression-free survival, recurrence, and quality of life measurements.DiscussionThe study results will provide more convincing evidence-based information for stages IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer patients and their gynecologic cancer surgeons in their choice of surgical method.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04939831, retrospectively registered on 25 June 2021.

Urinary retention between nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.

This study intended to assess the urinary retention between nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Relevant studies were selected from databases of PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Internet with the last report up to January 15, 2022. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were chosen as the evaluation index. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran Q test and I2 test. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on areas and cancer types (primary and metastatic cancer). A total of 8 articles (retrospective cohort studies) were selected in the meta-analysis. There were significant correlations between nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy in related with urinary retention (HR [95% CI] = 1.78 [1.37, 2.31], P < .001) and (HR [95% CI] = 2.49 [1.43, 4.33], P = .001) of cervical cancer patients. Egger test revealed a significant publication bias (P = .014). Sensitivity analysis via omitting 1 study at each time showed that omission of any study made significant difference (P < .05), indicating reliability and good stability for the analysis. Additionally, there were significant heterogeneities in most subgroups.

The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching.

Simple SummaryWe investigated the therapeutic role of conization prior to radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 to IIB cervical cancer regardless of pathologic high risk factors, using the propensity score matching method. Additional subgroup analysis was carried out to identify the effect of conization based on clinical and pathologic factors. Conization before radical hysterectomy was associated with reduced recurrence and mortality. Conization had benefit in patients with MIS, negative pelvic lymph nodes, tumor sized less than 4 cm. Delays of definite treatment due to conization did not have an effect on the prognosis of patients with high risk factors. This study reveals the protective role of preoperative conization in early-stage cervical cancer, along with identifying subgroups that may best benefit from the procedure. This information can be used for more tailored patient selection for minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.We primarily aimed to investigate the therapeutic role of conization prior to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Secondarily, we aimed to characterize a subgroup of patients who could potentially benefit from preoperative conization. Patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2009 stage IB1 to IIB cervical cancer from 1995 to 2020 were eligible. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and without preoperative conization. To adjust for the baseline characteristics of the two groups, 1:2 case–control propensity score matching was conducted. Survival analysis was performed between the two groups. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the effect of conization based on clinical and pathological factors. Patients who underwent preoperative conization showed better 5-year overall survival than those who did not (95.9% vs. 93.0%, p = 0.029); however, no difference was observed in progression-free survival (88.9% vs. 85.9%, p = 0.155). In multivariate Cox analysis, conization showed a 55% reduction in recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–1.01, p = 0.056) and 41% reduction in death (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34–1.02, p = 0.059), but with marginal statistical significance. In subgroup analysis, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), negative pelvic lymph node, and tumor size < 4 cm showed improved survival from conization. Conization before radical hysterectomy may be associated with improved survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. This information could serve as a basis for a more tailored patient selection for MIS for cervical cancer.

A chlorin e6 derivative‐mediated photodynamic therapy for patients with cervical and vaginal low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective analysis

AbstractCervical and vaginal low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) are associated with persistent human papillomavirus infections, and require an efficacious non‐invasive treatment such as photodynamic therapy due to anatomical characteristics. In this study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of a chlorin e6 derivative named STBF‐mediated photodynamic therapy (STBF‐PDT) for patients with cervical and vaginal LSIL. A total of 18 patients received STBF‐PDT for 3 to 6 times and followed up for 6 to 12 months; among them, 6 had cervical and vaginal LSIL and 1 had vaginal stump LSIL after hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Results showed the complete remission (CR) rates were 72.22% (13/18), and the HPV remission rates and HPV clearance rates were 88.89% (16/18) and 83.33% (15/18), respectively at 1‐month follow‐up. The CR reached 88.89% and HPV remission rates got 94.44% at the 6‐month follow‐up. There were no recurrence cases so far, and no pain, heaving sensation, scar, deformity, and any other obvious adverse reactions occurred during treatment and follow‐up. In conclusion, STBF‐PDT is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated method for the treatment of cervical and vaginal LSIL. It may have promising potential for applications in the future.

Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper No. 71 (July 2022).

The use of robotic-assisted keyhole surgery in gynaecology has expanded in recent years owing to technical advances. These include 3D viewing leading to improved depth perception, limitation of tremor, potential for greater precision and discrimination of tissues, a shorter learning curve and improved comfort for surgeons compared with conventional keyhole and open abdominal surgery. Robotic-assisted keyhole surgery, compared with conventional keyhole surgery, improves surgical performance without increasing operating time, minimises blood loss and intra- or postoperative complications, while reducing the need to revert to abdominal surgery. Moreover, surgeons using a robot experience fewer skeletomuscular problems of their own in the short and long term than those operating without a robot as an additional tool. This Scientific Impact Paper looks at the use of a robot in different fields of gynaecological surgery. A robot could be considered safe and a more effective surgical tool than conventional keyhole surgery for women who have to undergo complex gynaecology surgery or have associated medical issues such as body-mass index (BMI) at 30 kg/m2 or above or lung problems. The introduction of the use of robots in keyhole surgery has resulted in a decrease in the number of traditional open surgeries and the risk of conversion to open surgery after traditional keyhole surgery; both of which should be considered when examining the cost-benefit of using a robot. Limitations of robotic-assisted surgery remain the associated higher costs. In womb cancer surgery there is good evidence that introducing robotics into the service improves outcomes for women and may reduce costs.

The opportunities and challenges of gynecologic cancer in precision medicine

In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic cancer have entered a new era with the development of precision medicine. The diagnosis and treatment modes for ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, and endometrial cancer are constantly adjusted. The application of molecular targeted drugs and the progress of surgical concepts and technology have greatly improved the survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy have become a new hot spot in the treatment of cervical cancer. More clinical research data have been accumulated on the comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. The surgical management of endometrial cancer has been improved, and molecular diagnostics are increasingly used to guide the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer. Meanwhile, it's necessary to realize the limitations and challenges of precision medicine in gynecologic cancer.

Survival Impact of Residual Cancer Cells in Intraoperative Peritoneal Washes following Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

Objective: Residual cancer cells (RCCs) contribute to cancer recurrence either because of tumor spillage or undetectable pre-existing micrometastatic tumor clones. We hypothesized that the pathologic evaluation of intraoperative peritoneal washes may reveal RCCs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival impact of RCCs identified in intraoperative peritoneal washes and their correlation with clinicopathologic parameters following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods: A total of 229 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy were included. The intraoperative peritoneal washes after surgery were filtered through a strainer and the presence of tumor cells in the residual aspirate was determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological parameters were performed to identify predictors of recurrence. Results: RCCs in intraoperative peritoneal washes were identified in 19 patients (8.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that deep stromal invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 13.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.81–98.27; p = 0.0111), lymph node metastasis (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.01–3.99; p = 0.0482), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.89–4.61; p = 0.0139) were associated with tumor recurrence. However, the presence of RCCs was not associated with tumor recurrence (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 0.74–9.11; p = 0.1352). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that RCCs were associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05–0.99; p = 0.0488) and large tumor size (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 0.77–22.48; p = 0.0981). Conclusions: Although the presence of RCCs in intraoperative peritoneal washes do not significantly impact survival outcomes, there was a tendency of inferior survival outcomes in patients with RCCs. RCCs were associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and large tumor size.

A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial

BackgroundA retrospective study and a randomized controlled trial published in a high quality journal in late 2018 have shown that laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RH) was associated with worse survival than abdominal RH among patients with early stage cervical cancer. Radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer has been a classic landmark surgery in gynecology, therefore this conclusion is pivotal. The current trial is designed to reconfirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic RH and abdominal RH in cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2) patient survival under stringent operation standards and consistent tumor-free technique. This paper reports the rationale, design, and implementation of the trial.MethodsThis is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial. A total of 690 patients with stage IA1 (with intravascular), and IA2 cervical cancer will be enrolled over a period of three years. Patients are randomized (1:1) to either the laparoscopic RH or the abdominal RH group. Patients will then be followed-up for at least five years. The primary endpoint will be 5-year progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints will include 5-year overall survival rates, recurrence rates, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgery-related complications, and quality of life.DiscussionThe results of the trial will provide valuable evidence for guiding clinical decision of choosing appropriate treatment strategies for stage IA1 (LVSI) and stage IA2 cervical cancer patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04934982, Registered on 22 June 2021).

A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial

BackgroundA retrospective study and a randomized controlled trial published in late 2018 have shown that laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RH) was associated with worse survival than abdominal RH among patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer has been a classic landmark surgery in gynecology; therefore, this conclusion is pivotal. The current trial is designed to reconfirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic RH and abdominal RH in cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1) patient survival under stringent operation standards and consistent surgical oncologic principles.Methods/designThis is an investigator-initiated, Prospective, Randomized, Open, Blinded End-point (PROBE)-controlled non-inferiority trial. A total of 780 patients with stage IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer will be enrolled over a period of 3 years. Patients are randomized (1:1) to either the laparoscopic RH or the abdominal RH group. Patients will then be followed up for at least 5 years. The primary endpoint will be 5-year progression-free survival, and secondary endpoints include 5-year overall survival, recurrence, and quality of life measurements.DiscussionThe debate on laparoscopic versus abdominal RH is still ongoing, and high-quality evidences are needed to guide clinical practice. The study results will provide more convincing evidence-based information for early-stage cervical cancer patients and their gynecologic cancer surgeons in their choice of surgical method.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04929769. Registered on 18 June 2021

ASO Visual Abstract: Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study

ASO Visual Abstract: Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study

ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Brazilian Multicentric Cohort Study (CIRCOL).

ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Brazilian Multicentric Cohort Study (CIRCOL).

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.

To analyze the survival outcomes of patients in a Brazilian cohort who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with open surgery for early stage cervical cancer. A multicenter database was constructed, registering 1280 cervical cancer patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy from 2000 to 2019. For the final analysis, we included cases with a tumor ≤ 4 cm (stages Ia2 to Ib2, FIGO 2018) that underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2017. Propensity score matching was also performed. A total of 776 cases were ultimately analyzed, 526 of which were included in the propensity score matching analysis (open, n = 263; MIS, n = 263). There were 52 recurrences (9.9%), 28 (10.6%) with MIS and 24 (9.1%) with open surgery (p = 0.55); and 34 deaths were recorded, 13 (4.9%) and 21 (8.0%), respectively (p = 0.15). We noted a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 88.2% and 90.3% for those who received MIS and open surgery, respectively (HR 1.32; 95% CI: 0.76-2.29; p = 0.31) and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 91.8% and 91.1%, respectively (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.40-1.61; p = 0.53). There was no difference in 3-year DFS rates between open surgery and MIS for tumors ≤ 2 cm (95.7% vs. 90.8%; p = 0.16) or > 2 cm (83.9% vs. 85.4%; p = 0.77). Also, the 5-year OS between open surgery and MIS did not differ for tumors ≤ 2 cm (93.1% vs. 93.6%; p = 0.82) or > 2 cm (88.9% vs. 89.8%; p = 0.35). Survival outcomes were similar between minimally invasive and open radical hysterectomy in this large retrospective multicenter cohort.

Wertheim’s Operation. Problems and achievments

Aim. Analysis of modern modification of Wertheim’s operation and its results in Bukovina region for last 10 years.Methods. Analysis of literature in internet. Data about morbidity and mortality of cancer colli uteri in Chernivtsi Oncology Center.Results. An original description of the technique of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by Wertheim is presented. Modifications of the Wertheim operation with various classifications of interventions are considered. In first class of this classification are included extra fascial hysterectomies without resection of tissues, lymph nodules and fascia of pelvis which directly contradicts the principles of Wertheim's operation. The results of radical laparoscopic hysterectomy for cervical cancer are discussed. In 2019 trials, there was an almost three-fold excess of relapses after laparoscopic hysterectomies compared to open operations. The issues of the epidemiology of cervical cancer in Ukraine and Bukovina are considered. The incidence of cervical cancer in the Chernivtsi region was about 70 patients per year, or 8.4 per 100,000 population (data from 2016-2018). Cervical cancer mortality was from 40 to 43 people annually or 4.3-4.7 per 100,000 population. Wertheim’s operation is performed annually in 26-34 women and is practically not accompanied by complications and mortality.Conclusion. Wertheim’s operation is safe and unique method for treatment of cervical cancer.

Chinese expert consensus on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer could cause damage to pelvic autonomic nerves, leading to postoperative urination, defecation and sexual dysfunction. In order to improve the postoperative quality of life, the international Querleu-Morrow (Q-M) surgical classification system recommends the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (type-C1) as the mainstay operation. The Gynecologic Oncology Group affiliated to Chinese Obstetricians and Gynecologists Association has invited a number of domestic specialists and conducted in-depth discussions on key issues such as anatomical basis, surgical indications, techniques, postoperative evaluation for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Finally, the specialists reach a consensus to guide the standardized application of this procedure in China.

Laparoscopic appendectomy for metastatic cervical cancer presenting as appendicitis

BackgroundMetastatic lesions to the appendix are rare. They usually present with acute appendicitis or remain asymptomatic and are diagnosed incidentally. Metastases to the appendix have been reported from a number of primary tumor sites including ovary, colon, gastric and lung. We report a laparoscopic appendectomy for a metachronous metastatic lesion to the appendix from the uterine cervix.Case presentationA 68-year-old woman, who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer 16 years previously, presented with nausea and gradually worsening right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography scan showed an enlarged appendix and periappendiceal fat stranding. She was diagnosed with appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Pathological findings showed adenocarcinoma in the submucosa and muscularis propria. Gastrointestinal endoscopy and positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET–CT) did not show other lesions. Immunohistochemical analysis showed cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive, cytokeratin 20 (CK20) negative, estrogen receptor (ER) 70–80% and progesterone receptor (PgR) 40–50%. The ER and PgR expression was similar to the cervical lesion 16 years previously, and the diagnosis was a metastatic lesion to the appendix from the uterine cervix.ConclusionsMetastasis to the appendix from cancer of the uterine cervix is a rare lesion.

Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

ObjectiveMinimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome in an influential prospective, randomized trial. However, many centers worldwide performing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have data and experience that prove otherwise. We aim to review surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients operated by Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital, by experienced surgeons and standardization in radicality, for cervical carcinoma Stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009 to May 2014. Materials & methodsStandardised surgical technique with Parametrium & Paracolpium resection approach was adopted by qualified and experienced Gynecologic/Gyne-Oncologic Endoscopic & Minimally Invasive Surgeons in performing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009–May 2014, involving 53 patients. Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) Of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Tertiary Referral Centre), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology was accessed for surgical and oncologic outcomes. ResultsFifty-Three patients operated from January 2009 to May 2014 were followed up for an average of 96.7 months with longest follow-up at 127 months. There were no cases of recurrence or death reported. 5 Year – Survival Rate and 5 Year Disease-Free Survival Rate were 100%. Two patients received post-operative pelvic radiation concurrent with chemotherapy using Cisplatin due to greater than 1/3 cervical stromal invasion. ConclusionIt is vital to standardize minimally invasive surgical techniques for early stage cervical cancer, with focus on adequate radicality and resection which may contribute to excellent survival outcomes. Further international multi-center randomized trial (Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy In Cervical Cancer) will provide justification for continued practice of MIS in early stage cervical cancer.

Effectiveness of Sequential Chemoradiation vs Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Alone in Adjuvant Treatment After Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer

There is no current consensus on the role of chemotherapy in addition to radiation for postoperative adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors. To evaluate the clinical benefits of sequential chemoradiation (SCRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) compared with radiation alone (RT) as a postoperative adjuvant treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. After radical hysterectomy at 1 of 8 participating hospitals in China, patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB to IIA cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors were randomized 1:1:1 to receive adjuvant RT, CCRT, or SCRT. Data were collected from February 2008 to December 2018. Patients received adjuvant RT (total dose, 45-50 Gy), CCRT (weekly cisplatin, 30-40 mg/m2), or SCRT (cisplatin, 60-75 mg/m2, plus paclitaxel, 135-175 mg/m2) in a 21-day cycle, given 2 cycles before and 2 cycles after radiotherapy, respectively. The primary end point was the rate of disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years. A total of 1048 women (median [range] age, 48 [23-65] years) were included in the analysis (350 in the RT group, 345 in the CCRT group, and 353 in the SCRT group). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among the treatment groups except that the rate of lymph node involvement was lowest in the RT group (18.3%). In the intention-to-treat population, SCRT was associated with a higher rate of DFS than RT (3-year rate, 90.0% vs 82.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.76) and CCRT (90.0% vs 85.0%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96). Treatment with SCRT also decreased cancer death risk compared with RT (5-year rate, 92.0% vs 88.0%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.95) after adjustment for lymph node involvement. However, neither DFS nor cancer death risk was different among patients treated with CCRT or RT. In this randomized clinical trial, conducted in a postoperative adjuvant treatment setting, SCRT, rather than CCRT, resulted in a higher DFS and lower risk of cancer death than RT among women with early-stage cervical cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00806117.