Hypothermic Effects Of Nicotine Research Articles

Unexpected loss of sensitivity to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist activity of mecamylamine and dihydro-β-erythroidine in nicotine-tolerant mice.

ObjectivesThere is a long‐standing interest in developing nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonists for concomitant use with nAChR agonists (e.g., nicotine replacement) as complementary smoking cessation aids. Previous studies demonstrate that daily nicotine treatment confers tolerance to some effects of nicotine, as well as cross‐tolerance to other nAChR agonists. The current study assessed the extent to which antagonism of nicotine varies as a function of daily nicotine treatment.MethodsSchedule‐controlled responding and hypothermia were selected for study because they have been previously used to examine the pharmacology of nicotine, and both are sensitive to the development nicotine tolerance. The rate‐decreasing and hypothermic effects of nicotine, as well as antagonism of those effects, were examined in C57BL/6J mice before, during treatment with, and after discontinuation of three daily injections of 1.78 mg/kg nicotine. The nonselective nAChR antagonist mecamylamine and the β2 nAChR antagonist dihydro‐β‐erythroidine (DHβE) were studied in combination with nicotine.ResultsThe ED50 values of nicotine to produce rate‐decreasing and hypothermic effects were, respectively, 0.44 and 0.82 mg/kg prior, 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg during, and 0.74 and 1.1 mg/kg after discontinuation of daily nicotine treatment. Prior to daily nicotine treatment, mecamylamine decreased response rate and rectal temperature. However, during daily nicotine, mecamylamine (up to 5.6 mg/kg) only decreased rectal temperature. DHβE (up to 5.6 mg/kg) when studied prior to daily nicotine decreased rectal temperature, but that decrease was abolished during chronic nicotine treatment. Mecamylamine and DHβE antagonized the rate‐decreasing and hypothermic effects of nicotine before and after daily nicotine; however, during daily nicotine, mecamylamine and DHβE antagonized only the hypothermic effects of nicotine.ConclusionsThe differential antagonism of rate‐decreasing and hypothermic effects implicates differential involvement of nAChR subtypes. The decreased capacity of mecamylamine and DHβE to antagonize nicotine during chronic nicotine treatment may indicate that their effectiveness as smoking cessations might vary as a function of nicotine tolerance and dependence.

Differential antagonism and tolerance/cross-tolerance among nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists: scheduled-controlled responding and hypothermia in C57BL/6J mice.

The tobacco-dependence pharmacotherapies varenicline and cytisine act as partial α4β2 nAChR agonists. However, the extent to which α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) mediate their in-vivo effects remains unclear. Nicotine, varenicline, cytisine, and epibatidine were studied in male C57BL/6J mice for their effects on rates of fixed ratio responding and rectal temperature alone and in combination with the nonselective nAChR antagonist mecamylamine and the α4β2 nAChR antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine. The effects of nicotine, varenicline, cytisine, epibatidine, and cocaine were assessed before and during chronic nicotine treatment. The rate-decreasing and hypothermic effects of nicotine, varenicline, cytisine, and epibatidine were antagonized by mecamylamine (1 mg/kg), but only the effects of nicotine and epibatidine were antagonized by dihydro-β-erythroidine (3.2 mg/kg). Chronic nicotine produced 4.7 and 5.1-fold rightward shifts in the nicotine dose-effect functions to decrease response rate and rectal temperature, respectively. Nicotine treatment decreased the potency of epibatidine to decrease response rate and rectal temperature 2.2 and 2.9-fold, respectively, and shifted the varenicline dose-effect functions 2.0 and 1.7-fold rightward, respectively. Cross-tolerance did not develop from nicotine to cytisine. These results suggest that the in-vivo pharmacology of tobacco cessation aids cannot be attributed to a single nAChR subtype; instead, multiple receptor subtypes differentially mediate their effects.

Hypothermic Effects of Δ9‐THC and Nicotine in Kynurenine‐3‐Monooxygenase (KMO) Knockout Mice

Kynurenic acid, a metabolic product of the tryptophan‐kynurenine synthesis pathway, is both a competitive antagonist at the glycine co‐agonist site of NMDA receptors and a negative allosteric modulator at α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). α7 nAChRs are important for mediating the effects of nicotine, but have also recently been implicated in the effects of Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), the primary psychoactive component of Cannabis. Transgenic mice lacking kynurenine‐3‐monooxygenase (KMO) exhibit increased levels of kynurenic acid and thus presumably decreased function of α7 nAChRs. The current study examined the extent to which the hypothermic effects of nicotine and Δ9‐THC are modified in KMO knockout mice (n=7) as compared to wild‐type C57BL/6J controls (n=7). Δ9‐THC (10 mg/kg) produced a maximum decrease in temperature of 3.0°C at 60 min; hypothermia was no longer evident at 240 min. Nicotine (1.78 mg/kg base) produced a maximum hypothermic effect of 7.2°C at 30 min; this effect was no longer evident at 90 min. The magnitude of effect and the time course of hypothermia produced by Δ9‐THC and nicotine were not significantly different between KMO knockout and wild‐type mice. These data suggest that at least some of the in vivo effects of Δ9‐THC and nicotine are not affected by differences in endogenous levels of kynurenic acid. Supported by USPHS grant DA25267 and MH090127.

In vivo characterization of a novel inhibitor of CNS nicotinic receptors

There are multiple types of nicotine acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) in the brain associated with synaptic function, signal processing, or cell survival. The therapeutic targeting of nicotinic receptors in the brain will benefit from the identification of drugs, which may be selective for their ability to activate or inhibit a limited range of these receptor subtypes. We previously identified a family of bis-tetramethylpiperidine compounds as selective inhibitors of neuronal-type nicotinic receptors. In the present study we describe the in vivo effects and properties of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl heptanoate (TMPH), a novel inhibitor of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Delivered systemically, this drug can block central nervous system effects of nicotine, indicating that this drug is able to cross the blood–brain barrier and access sites in the brain. Unlike the prototype CNS-active nicotinic inhibitor, mecamylamine, TMPH blocked some but not all of the CNS effects of nicotine, indicating that it has a unique selectivity for specific receptor subtypes in the brain. The nAChR subtypes that mediate the locomotor effects and hypothermic effects of nicotine appear to be less sensitive to TMPH than those which mediate analgetic effects and discriminative stimuli. These results indicate that TMPH may possess unique selectivity for specific nicotinic receptor subtypes.

A nicotinic receptor antagonist enhances the hypothermic response to a muscarinic agonist

1. Chronic treatment with amitriptyline produces supersensitivity to the hypothermic effects of the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine. 2. Chronic treatment with amitriptyline also produces supersensitivity to the hypothermic effects of nicotine. 3. Oxotremorine and other naturally occurring muscarinic agonists are also nicotinic agonists. 4. Chronic treatment with amitriptyline produces time-dependent and reversible supersensitivity to the hypothermic effects of nicotine. 5. The authors assessed the possibility that the development of supersensitivity to oxotremorine following chronic treatment with amitriptyline is related to an effect of this antidepressant on a nicotinic mechanism. 6. A nicotinic receptor antagonist would blunt (though not necessarily eliminate) enhanced sensitivity to the thermic effects of oxotremorine if the nicotinic effects of the latter are significant. 7. The simultaneous administration of mecamylamine (a peripherally and centrally active nicotinic receptor antagonist) greatly augments (rather than blunts) the hypothermic response to oxotremorine. 8. The data suggest that the oxotremorine may activate a nicotinic mechanism counterbalancing its effect on a muscarinic mechanism. 9. This is consistent with previously published reports that the activation of nicotinic and muscarinic mechanisms can exert opposite effects.