Hypotensive Lower Esophageal Sphincter Research Articles

Impact of CYP2C19 metabolizer status on esophageal mucosal inflammation, acid exposure, and motility among patients on chronic proton-pump inhibitor therapy with refractory symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The extent of disease severity remains unclear among CYP2C19 rapid and ultra-rapid metabolizers with refractory symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on chronic proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). To determine the impact of CYP2C19 metabolizer status in relation to chronic PPI therapy with a focus on the extent of esophageal inflammation, acid exposure, and motor function. This retrospective study included 54 patients with refractory GERD symptoms who underwent CYP2C19 genotyping for PPI metabolism, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, ambulatory pH study, and high-resolution esophageal manometry. Patients were divided into three groups: normal metabolizer (NM) group, intermediate metabolizer/poor metabolizer (IM/PM) group, and rapid metabolizer/ultra-rapid metabolizer (RM/UM) group. The Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and one-way ANOVA for comparing means. Rapid metabolizer/ultra-rapid metabolizer (RM/UM) group more frequently had either Los Angeles grade C or D GERD (7/19, 36.8% vs 1/21, 4.8%, P = 0.011) and metaplasia of the esophagus (9/19, 47.4% vs 2/21, 9.5%, P = 0.007) when compared to the NM group. RM/UM group were more frequently offered dilatation for nonobstructive dysphagia (8/19, 42.1% vs 3/21, 14.3%, P = 0.049) and more exhibited a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure compared to the NM group (10/19, 52.6% vs 4/21, 19%, P = 0.026). All three groups exhibited comparable DeMeester scores when PPIs were discontinued 72 hours before the ambulatory pH study. CYP2C19 RMs and UMs on chronic PPI with refractory GERD symptoms exhibited greater esophageal mucosal inflammation, as observed both endoscopically and histologically, and more were found to have hypotensive LES resting pressures and more were offered esophageal dilatation.

Effect of aging and obesity on esophageal mucosal integrity as measured by baseline impedance.

Low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) values support gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis. Recent data denote that age and obesity may affect MNBI. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic MNBI cutoffs as also the effect of aging and body mass index (BMI) on MNBI. In total 311 patients (M/F: 139/172, mean age: 47 ± 13) referred for typical GERD symptoms that have undertaken both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and pH-Impedance studies off PPI were evaluated. MNBI at 3, 5, and 17 cm over lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were evaluated. GERD was diagnosed if acid exposure time (AET) >6%. Mean BMI was 26.6 ± 5.9 kg/cm2 . GERD was diagnosed in 39.2% and 13.5% had inconclusive GERD. MNBI was correlated to patients' age, BMI, AET, and the length of LES-CD separation and at 3 cm also to the total number of reflux and LES hypotension. In the multivariate analysis MNBI at 3 and 5 cm was independently correlated only to age, BMI, and AET. Patients with definite GERD showed lower MNBI at 3 cm compared with inconclusive GERD though both showed lower values when compared with GERD absence. At 3 cm MNBI ability for diagnosing GERD was good (0.815, p < 0.001 95% CI: 0.766-0.863) with an optimal cutoff point of 1281 Ohm. According to our study findings age and BMI affect independently lower esophageal MNBI values in patients evaluated for GERD. MNBI significantly aids toward GERD diagnosis though in a real-life setting MNBI values much lower than the one previously proposed should be used.

Associations Between Patterns of Esophageal Dysmotility and Extra-Intestinal Features in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

The gastrointestinal tract is commonly involved in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with varied manifestations. As our understanding of SSc gastrointestinal disease pathogenesis and risk stratification is limited, we sought to investigate whether patterns of esophageal dysfunction associate with specific clinical phenotypes in SSc. Patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry who completed high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) studies as part of their clinical care between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Associations between esophageal abnormalities on HREM (absent contractility [AC], ineffective esophageal motility [IEM], hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter [hypoLES]) and patient demographic information, clinical characteristics, and autoantibody profiles were examined. Ninety-five patients with SSc had HREM data. Sixty-five patients (68.4%) had AC (37 patients with only AC, 28 patients with AC and a hypoLES), 9 patients (9.5%) had IEM, and 11 patients (11.6%) had normal studies. AC was significantly associated with diffuse cutaneous disease (38.5% versus 10.0%; P < 0.01), more severe Raynaud's phenomenon, including digital pits, ulcers, or gangrene (56.9% versus 30.0%; P=0.02), and reduced median diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (50.6% versus 72.2%; P=0.03). AC was observed in most of the patients who died (13 of 14; P=0.06). These findings were not seen in patients with IEM. Among patients with SSc, AC is associated with a significantly more severe clinical phenotype. IEM may associate with a milder phenotype. Further studies are needed to evaluate AC, IEM, and their clinical impact relative to the timing of other end-organ complications in SSc.

Esophageal Manometry and pHmetry Profile in Obese Patients Selected for Bariatric Surgery

Background: Obesity is a highly prevalent disease and risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) which could predispose to esophageal motility disorders. Few studies exist regarding manometric and phmetric findings in patients with obesity who are candidates to bariatric surgery. The objective was to describe the preoperative profile of patients with obesity selected for bariatric surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 338 patients with obesity, subjected to 24 hour-pHmetry with impedance and manometry prior to bariatric surgery between 2006 and 2021. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used for analysis. Results: The mean age and body mass index was 41.94 ± 0.70 years and 38.75 ± 0.37 kg/m2, respectively. GERD symptoms were present in 43.3% (139/321). A 24-hour pHmetry analysis showed a pathologic DeMeester index in 46.7% of patients, of which 64.3% (63/98) were symptomatic. Impedance was abnormal in 53.4%, of which 67% (73/109) were symptomatic. Manometry registered dysmotility in 22.7% (69/304) of patients, a mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure of 11.93 ± 0.43 mmHg and hypotensive LES in 38.5%. Mean gastric pressure was 9.79 ± 0.33 mmHg after deglutition and only 11.4% (34/299) presented abnormal gastroesophageal gradients. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of dysmotility and GERD in candidates to bariatric surgery with obesity. Esophageal 24 hour-pHmetry with impedance and manometry should be considered within preoperative tests as pathologic results could guide appropriate procedure selection, at least in symptomatic patients.

Post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, intrathoracic sleeve migration and its management: A case series and review of literature.

De novo or persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease which may or may not be associated with injury of the oesophageal mucosa is now a known complication in post-sleeve gastrectomy patients. Repair of hiatal hernias to avoid such circumstances has been commonly performed, although recurrences may occur resulting in migration of gastric sleeve into the thorax, which is now a well-known complication. We report four cases of post-sleeve gastrectomy patients who presented with reflux symptoms, with their contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen showing intrathoracic sleeve migration and had hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter with normal body motility on their oesophageal manometry. A laparoscopic revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery with hiatal hernia repair was performed for all four of them. No post-operative complications were seen at 1-year follow-up. Laparoscopic reduction of migrated sleeve with posterior cruroplasty and conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery can be safely performed for patients presenting with reflux symptoms in cases of intra-thoracic sleeve migration with good short-term outcomes.

Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and lower esophageal sphincter characteristics in patients with absent contractility.

Absent contractility is a rare esophageal motility disorder defined by high-resolution manometry which remains poorly understood in pathogenesis and management. We investigated the clinical symptoms, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics in adult patients diagnosed with absent contractility on high resolution manometry and factors associated with erosive esophagitis that were found on endoscopy in these patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with absent contractility who were examined at the Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vietnam between March 2018 and December 2020. Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and LES metrics were collected and compared between individuals with and without erosive esophagitis. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine a variety of factors associated with erosive esophagitis. Among 7519 patients who underwent high resolution manometry, 204 (2.7%) were diagnosed with absent contractility. The mean age of the study sample was 45.9 years, 65.7% were women, and none had systemic sclerosis. The most common symptoms were regurgitation, belching, epigastric pain, and bloating. On endoscopy, 50% had erosive esophagitis, mostly Los Angeles grade A (42.9%). On manometry, 44.6% of the patients had LES hypotension and 68.1% had low integrated relaxation pressure in 4 seconds (IRP4s). Male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-3.89) and an IRP4s < 5 mm Hg (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-4.37) were significantly associated with erosive esophagitis. Absent contractility was present in many patients without known systemic diseases. Erosive esophagitis was common and associated with male sex and low IRP4s.

Relationship Among Helicobacter Pylori, Lower Esophagus Sphincter Pressure, and Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Single-Center Experience.

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship among lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), Helicobacter pylori (Hp), and gastroesophageal reflux (GER).MethodsThe retrospective study included patients with isolated hypertensive or hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) who underwent esophageal manometry in our gastroenterology motility laboratory and had normal manometry results. Demographic characteristics, complaints on admission, upper endoscopy findings, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring results, and presence of Hp in gastric biopsy were evaluated.ResultsA total of 1226 patients were included in the study, among whom women comprised 54% of all patients. Mean age was 45.4±13.4 years. Most common presenting complaint was pyrosis (85.4%). Pathological reflux was detected in 61.4% of the patients in 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Reflux esophagitis was detected in 22.9% and LES laxity was present in 17.4% of the patients. In gastric biopsy, Hp was positive in 40% of the patients. The age of patients with hypertensive LES was significantly higher and female gender and body mass index (BMI) were associated with hypertensive LES. Pyrosis was significantly less prevalent in patients with hypertensive LESP. Esophagitis and LES laxity were significantly more prevalent in patients with hypotensive LES. No significant difference was found among the three groups with regard to reflux and Hp positivity. No significant difference was found between Hp-positive and Hp-negative groups with regard to reflux and reflux esophagitis.ConclusionNo clear relationship was found among LES disorders, GER, and Hp. Moreover, no significant difference was found among LES disorders with regard to GER, while the presence of hypotensive LESP, rather than Hp, was found to be an important factor in the development of reflux esophagitis.

GASTROESOPHAGEAL SYMPTOMS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS: MISTAKES IN PERFORMING THE PROCEDURE?

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND:Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGB) is the recommended procedure for morbidly obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, there have been reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms or esophagitis after LGB. Few functional esophageal studies have been reported to date.AIM: To evaluate the anatomic and physiologic factors contributing to the appearance of these problems in patients who underwent LGB.METHODS: This prospective study included 38 patients with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux symptoms submitted to LGB. They were subjected to clinical, endoscopic, radiologic, manometric, and 24-h pH-monitoring evaluations.RESULTS: Eighteen (47.4%) of 38 patients presented with heartburn or regurgitation, 7 presented with pain, and 4 presented with dysphagia. Erosive esophagitis was observed in 11 (28.9%) patients, and Barrett’s esophagus (5.7%) and jejunitis (10.5%) were also observed. Hiatal hernia was the most frequent finding observed in 15 (39.5%) patients, and most (10.5%) of these patients appeared with concomitant anastomotic strictures. A long blind jejunal loop was detected in one (2.6%) patient. Nearly 75% of the patients had hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (9.61±4.05 mmHg), 17.4% had hypomotility of the esophageal body, and 64.7% had pathologic acid reflux (% time pH <4=6.98±5.5; DeMeester’s score=32.4±21.15).CONCLUSION: Although rare, it is possible to observe gastroesophageal reflux and other important postoperative symptoms after LGB, which are associated with anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction and proximal gastric pouch.

ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTIONAL DISORDERS IN THE PRE-OPERATORY EVALUATION OF BARIATRIC SURGERY.

Obesity is an independent risk factor for esophageal symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and motor abnormalities. When contemplating bariatric surgery, patients with obesity type III undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and also esophageal manometry (EMN), and prolonged pHmetry (PHM) as part of their pre-operative evaluation. Description of endoscopy, manometry and pHmetry findings in patients with obesity type III preparing for bariatric surgery, and correlation of these findings with the presence of typical GERD symptoms. Retrospective study in which clinical symptoms of GERD were assessed, focusing on the presence of heartburn and regurgitation. All patients underwent EMN, PHM and most of them EGD. 114 patients (93 females-81%), average age 36 years old, average BMI of 45.3, were studied. Typical GERD symptoms were referred by 43 (38%) patients while 71 (62%) were asymptomatic. Eighty two patients (72% of total) underwent EGD and 36 (42%) evidenced esophageal abnormalities. Among the abnormal findings, hiatal hernia was seen in 36%, erosive esophagitis (EE) in 36%, and HH+EE in 28%. An abnormal EMN was recorded in 51/114 patients (45%). The main abnormality was a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in 32%, followed by ineffective esophageal motility in 25%, nutcracker esophagus in 19%, IEM + hypotensive LES in 10%, intra-thoracic LES (6%), hypertensive LES (4%), aperistalsis (2%) and achalasia (2%). Among the 43 symptomatic patients, 23 (53%) had abnormal EMN and 31/71 asymptomatic cases (44%) also presented this finding (P=0.30). PHM showed abnormal reflux in 60/114 patients (53%), with a predominance of bi-positional reflux (42%), followed by supine reflux (33%) and upright reflux (25%). Abnormal PHM was found in 26/43 symptomatic cases (60%) and also among 34/71 asymptomatic cases (48%) (P=0.19). Manometric abnormalities were common in obesity type III patients, the most frequent being hypotensive LES, followed by IEM. Most patients were asymptomatic. There was no correlation between the finding of motor abnormalities and the presence of symptoms. More than half the patients had abnormal reflux at PHM. We found no significant correlation between abnormal reflux and the presence of symptoms.

Esophageal manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and duodenal mucosal histopathology in systemic sclerosis.

Background and AimSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is known to involve the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in dysmotility, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and mucosal changes causing significant morbidity. The study aimed to assess esophageal motility and duodenal mucosal changes in SSc.MethodsThis is a prospective, cross‐sectional, single‐center study of 23 patients with SSc diagnosed on the basis of standard criteria. Clinical details including the GI symptoms were recorded. All of them underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with duodenal biopsy, and 21 underwent esophageal manometry.ResultsRegurgitation, heartburn, and dysphagia were seen in 19 (82%), 16 (69%), and 10 (43%) patients, respectively. On endoscopy, 19 patients (83%) showed changes of reflux esophagitis (4 had grade C esophagitis), and 3 had esophageal candidiasis. Of the 21 patients who underwent esophageal manometry, 13 (62%) had absent peristalsis, 6 (28%) had ineffective peristalsis, and 10 (48%) had hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Duodenal biopsy showed partial villous atrophy in 9 (39%) patients, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes in 18 (78%), and excess of mononuclear inflammatory cells in lamina propria in 21 (91%). Partial villous atrophy was seen more commonly in those with abnormal esophageal peristalsis and a hypotensive LES.ConclusionMost of the patients with SSc had esophageal dysmotility in the form of absent peristalsis, ineffective esophageal peristalsis, and hypotensive LES. Histology of descending duodenum demonstrated partial villous atrophy and chronic inflammatory infiltrates in most of the patients with SSc.

Indicators of Esophageal pH-Impedance Monitoring and High-Resolution Manometry in Patients with Various Forms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Aim. The aim of the study is to analyze the regularities of changes in the basic indicators of esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive reflux disease (ERD) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) in comparison with healthy individuals.Materials and methods. 69 patients were examined, including 19 patients with NERD, 16 patients with ERD, 14 patients with BE and 20 individuals comprising the control group (CG). The gender structure was as follows: 44 male and 25 female patients. The average age of the examined patients was 46 years. All patients underwent 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and high resolution manometry.Results. According to the data of 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring, the total time in the esophagus with pH &lt; 4 was 2.4 % in the control group, 9 % in the NERD group, 20.25 % in the ERD group and 23.5 % in the patients with BE (p &lt; 0.05). The average number of acid refluxes was 22.5 in CG, 61 in the NERD group, 77 in the ERD group and 86 in patients with BE (p &lt; 0.05). The time of chemical clearance was 1.7 minutes in CG, 2.2 minutes in the group of patients with NERD, 2.9 minutes in the ERD group and 3 minutes in the BE group (p &lt; 0.05). The mean nocturnal baseline impedance was 2483.5 Ohm in CG, 1775.0 Ohm in the NERD group, 771.0 Ohm in the ERD group and 911.0 Ohm in the BE group (p &lt; 0.05). The normal parameters of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) structure and function according to the data of highresolution manometry were observed among 85 % of the control group, 63 % of patients with NERD, 25 % of patients with ERD and 36 % of BE group. The presence of hiatal hernia (HH) and/or hypotension of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was observed in 15 % of patients from the CG, in 37 % of patients with NERD, in 75 % of patients with ERD and in 64 % of patients with BE. The normal parameters of the motor function of the esophagus were observed in CG (85 %), as well as in patients with NERD (79 %). In patients with ERB and BE, normal motor activity was noted in 25 % and 29 % of the cases, respectively. Disturbances of the motor function of the thoracic esophagus in CG were represented in 10 % of the cases by ineffective peristalsis and hypercontractility in the form of distal esophagospasm in 5 % of the cases. In the NERD group, 16 % of patients had ineffective peristalsis and 5 % of patients had hypercontractility in the form of a hypercontractile esophagus. In patients of ERD and BE groups, the disorders of the motor function of the thoracic esophagus were predominantly represented by ineffective peristalsis, in 75 % and 50 % of the patients, respectively. In addition, in the group of patients with BE, in 21 % of the cases, motor function disorders were observed in the form of absence of thoracic esophagus contractions.Conclusion. It is shown that such indicators as increased level of acid exposure, increased amount of acid reflux, slowed chemical clearance, lowered mean nocturnal baseline impedance, as well as disorders in the structure and function of the esophageal-gastric junction and motility of the thoracic esophagus are associated with the severity of GERD.

Radiologic, endoscopic, and functional patterns in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard in treatment of morbid obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Resolution of GERD symptoms is reported to be approximately 85% to 90%. ObjectiveTo evaluate patients with persistent GERD symptoms after RYGB and to identify contributing factors. SettingUniversity hospital, cross-sectional study. MethodsData of patients evaluated for persistent GERD with a history of RYGB between January 2012 and December 2015 were reviewed. GERD was assessed with questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-impendance manometry, and barium swallow. ResultsOf 47 patients, 44 (93.6%) presented with typical GERD, 18 (38.3%) with obstruction, 8 (17%) with pulmonary symptoms, and 21 (44.7%) with pain. The interval between RYGB and evaluation was a median of 3.8 years (range .8–12.6); median patient age was 36.5 years (19.1–67.2). Median body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2 (20.3–47.2). Pouch gastric fistulas were seen in 2 (5.1%), enlarged pouches in 5 (10.6%), and hiatal hernias in 25 patients (53.2%). Twelve (23.4%) had esophagitis>Los Angeles (LA) grade B. Manometry was performed in 45 (95.7%) and off–proton pump inhibitor 24-hour pH-impedance-metry in 44 patients (94.6%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) had esophageal hypomotility or aperistalsis; hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was seen in 26 patients (57.8%). Increased esophageal acid exposure (>4% pH<4) was found in 27 (61.4%), an increased number of reflux episodes (>53) in 30 patients (68.2%). Symptoms were deemed as functional in 6 (12.8%). ConclusionThe evaluation for persistent GERD after RYGB revealed a high percentage of hiatal hernias, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, and severe esophageal motility disorders. These findings might have an influence on hiatal hernia closure concomitant with RYGB and the role of pH manometry in the preoperative bariatric assessment.

Evaluation and management of esophageal manifestations in systemic sclerosis.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystemic autoimmune connective tissue disorder; in the gastrointestinal tract, the esophagus is the most commonly affected organ. Symptoms of esophageal disease are due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal motor dysfunction. Since the development of high-resolution manometry (HRM), this method has been preferred for the study of SSc patients with esophageal involvement. Using HRM, classic scleroderma esophagus, defined as absent or ineffective peristalsis of the distal esophagus in combination with a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, was found in as many as 55% of SSc patients. Endoscopy is the appropriate test for evaluating dysphagia and identifying evidence and possible complications of GERD. In the therapeutic area, treatment ranges from general supportive measures to the administration of drugs such as proton pump inhibitors and/or prokinetics. However, as many SSc patients do not respond to existing therapies, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic modalities. Buspirone, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor agonist, could be a putative therapeutic option, as it was found to exert a significant beneficial effect in SSc patients with esophageal involvement. This review summarizes our knowledge concerning the evaluation and management of esophageal manifestations in SSc patients, including emerging therapeutic modalities.

The Contribution of High-Resolution versus Conventional Esophageal Manometry to the Assessment of Esophageal Motor Disorders in Patients With Non-Cardiac Chest Pain (NCCP)

Introduction: NCCP is defined as recurring, angina-like, retrosternal chest pain of non-cardiac origin. It has been estimated that up to 30% of the non-GERD related NCCP patients demonstrate an esophageal motor disorder using conventional manometry (CM). Thus, the aim of the study was to determine if high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), which has become the standard of care, improved the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders, as compared with CM, in patients with NCCP. Methods: We evaluated 300 consecutive non-GERD related NCCP patients who underwent either HREM or CM. A total of 150 patients had CM and the other 150 patients HREM. The Chicago 3 classification and the Castell and Spechler classification were used to determine the esophageal motor disorder of patients undergoing HREM and CM, respectively. Results: In both HREM and CM groups, a normal esophageal motility study was the most frequent finding (47% vs. 36%, respectively). In patients who underwent CM, the most commonly demonstrated esophageal motility disorder was hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter. Hypotensive LES was a significantly more common finding in patients undergoing CM versus HREM (27.3% vs. 4.7%, p<0.001). Other less common motility disorders seen in the CM group were nonspecific esophageal motility disorders (NEMD) (12%), nutcracker esophagus (9.3%), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (6.7%), achalasia (2.7%), distal esophageal spasm (DES) (5.3%), and absent contractility (0.67%). In general, hypertensive motility disorders, like DES and nutcracker esophagus, were less common than hypotensive motility disorders (15% vs. 35%, p=0.9) in NCCP patients. There was no significant difference in the number of hypertensive or hypotensive motility disorders diagnosed with CM versus those diagnosed with HREM. In the HREM group, IEM was the most commonly diagnosed motility abnormality. The likelihood of finding an IEM was significantly more common in the HREM group as compared with the CM group (25% vs. 7%, p<0.001). Other motility abnormalities that were less commonly diagnosed with HREM included: achalasia (7.3%), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (4%), absent contractility (4%), jackhammer/nutcracker esophagus (3.3%), DES (2.7%) and NEMD (1.3%). Conclusion: HREM did not improve the percentage and type of esophageal motor disorders diagnosed in NCCP patients as compared with CM. This is likely due to limitations of Chicago 3 classification. Normal esophageal motility remains the most common finding.

Spectrum of esophageal dysmotility in systemic sclerosis on high-resolution esophageal manometry as defined by Chicago classification.

The classic manometric findings in systemic sclerosis are aperistalsis of the esophageal body with hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter. These changes contribute to gastroesophageal reflux disease in these patients. With widespread use of high-resolution esophageal manometry, diverse abnormalities are seen. The aim of this study is to characterize esophageal dysmotility in patients with systemic sclerosis undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry and compare demographic features and diagnostic test results among patients with varying degrees of esophageal dysmotility. Patients with systemic sclerosis who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry between January 2008 and October 2014 at our institution were identified. High-resolution esophageal manometry studies were reinterpreted using the Chicago Classification, v3.0 criteria. We also reviewed the patient charts for demographic data, indications for manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, pH studies, medication use, and autoantibody panel. The cohort consisted of 122 patients with a mean age of 53.3±15.3 years. High-resolution esophageal manometry was normal in 23, showed ineffective esophageal motility in 22, absent contractility in 73, and one case each of type II achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, hypercontractile esophagus, and distal esophageal spasm. Patients with absent contractility were younger and more likely to have erosive esophagitis, hiatal hernia, and esophageal strictures than patients with ineffective esophageal motility or normal manometry. There were no statistically significant differences in the groups based on autoantibodies or indications for manometry. Diverse esophageal motility abnormalities were noted in systemic sclerosis with ineffective esophageal motility or absent contractility observed in over three-fourth of the patients. Patients with absent contractility were younger and had more severe reflux. The severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease related endoscopic findings correlated with the degree of esophageal dysmotility on high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Evaluation of Esophageal Functions by Manometry in Iron Deficiency Anemia Patients.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate whether any esophageal motor dysfunction exists in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA).MethodsThe study included 39 patients (34 women, mean age: 44.17 ± 14.21 years) who met WHO diagnostic criteria for IDA. An additional 30 functional dyspepsia patients were also included as a control group. Esophageal motility testing was performed; esophagus contraction amplitude, peak velocity, contraction time, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, LES relaxation, and LES relaxation duration were assessed.ResultsA majority (76.4%) of patients had at least one IDA symptom, such as reflux, chest pain, or dysphagia. Manometric findings in IDA patients vs. controls were as follows: mean LES resting pressure (mm Hg): 25.41 ± 11.67 vs. 19.96 ± 6.58 (P = 0.025); mean esophageal contraction amplitude (mm Hg): 61.61 ± 24.21 vs. 63.23 ± 18.86 (P = 0.764); mean LES relaxation duration (s, x ± SD): 5.33 ± 1.61 vs. 8.75 ± 1.86 (P = 0.000); mean LES relaxation (%): 93.30 ± 9.88 vs. 95.53 ± 5.81 (P = 0.278); mean peak velocity (cm/s): 12.67 ± 37.95 vs. 3.50 ± 1.63 (P = 0.191). Esophageal dysmotility was found in 11 (28.2%) IDA patients. Non-specific esophageal motor disorder was found in three patients, hypomotility of the esophagus was found in three patients, achalasia was found in two patients, hypertensive LES was found in two patients, and hypotensive LES was found in one patient.ConclusionLES resting pressure was higher and LES relaxation duration was shorter in patients with IDA. Esophageal dysmotility was present in 28.2% of the patients with IDA A little more than half of patients had dysphagia symptoms. IDA may contribute to esophageal motility dysfunction and esophageal symptoms.

Clinical Utility of Esophageal Manometry in the Patients with Dysphagia : Experience from Sudan

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of esophageal manometry among Sudanese patients presenting to the National Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Ibn Sina Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan. Consecutive patients referred for esophageal manometry at the aforementioned center from July 2008 through January 2011 were included in the study. Manometric studies were done after stopping medicines with a known effect on esophageal motility and an overnight fast. Immediately before the manometric study, the patients' history and clinical examination were recorded using a structured questionnaire. The major referral reason was the investigation of dysphagia in 78 patients (60.5%), followed by the evaluation of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 39 patients (30%), while 11 patients (9%) were referred because of non-cardiac chest pain. The manometric diagnosis in the 78 patients with dysphagia, where 51(65.4%) had achalasia, 13(16.7%) had nonspecific motility disorder, the remaining percentage was formed by GERD diffuse esophageal spasm, connective tissue disease, Nutcracker esophagus, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, patient manometry suggestive of myasthenia gravis, and normal manometry. GERD and Achalasia were the commonest conditions among the study group. Patients presenting with achalasia manifest the same clinical symptoms as published in the literature. The leading abnormality predisposing to GERD was hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and weak esophageal clearance function. GERD was main cause of non-cardiac chest pain in the study population. However, it is difficult to generalize the findings of this study for the whole country since it was a single center study.

Importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring for the evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic (ENT) manifestations of GERD. A multicenter study

Background/AimsPatients with otorhinolaryngologic (ear, nose, and throat—ENT) symptoms attributed to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are usually treated with medication based on the findings of nasal endoscopy and laryngoscopy only. This study aims to determine sensitivity and specificity of symptoms, nasal endoscopy, and laryngoscopy for the diagnosis of GERD as compared to pH monitoring. MethodsWe studied 79 patients (mean age 53 years, 38 % males) in whom ENT symptoms were assumed to be secondary to GERD. All patients underwent a transnasal laryngoscopy by the ENT team and upper endoscopy and esophageal function tests by the surgical team. GERD was defined by a pathological pH monitoring. ResultsPathologic reflux by pH monitoring was documented in 36 of the 79 patients (46 %), with a mean DeMeester score of 44. In 25 of the 36 patients (69 %), distal and proximal reflux was present. Among patients with negative pH monitoring, one patient was diagnosed with achalasia. ENT symptom sensitivity for globus, hoarseness and throat clearing was respectively 11, 58, and 33 %; specificity was respectively 77, 42, and 58 %. Positive predictive value for nasal endoscopy and laryngoscopy was 46 %. Among patients with positive pH monitoring, 13 (36 %) had a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (p < 0.01) and 27 (34 %) had abnormal peristalsis (p < 0.01). ConclusionsIn conclusion, the results of this study showed that (a) ENT symptoms were unreliable for the diagnosis of GERD and (b) laryngoscopy had a low positive predictive value for the diagnosis of GERD. These data confirm the importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring in any patient with suspected ENT manifestations of GERD before starting empiric therapy with acid-reducing medications since pathologic reflux by pH monitoring was confirmed in less than half of the patients with suspected GERD.

PWE-083 Behavioural Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease Caused by Supragastric Belching

Introduction Supragastric belching (SGB) is considered to be a behavioural phenomenon, thus gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) caused by SGB can be considered as behavioural GORD. Behavioural GORD may necessitate differential treatment to ‘classical’ GORD and therefore requires diagnosis as a distinct clinical entity. This study aims to establish the prevalence of GOR events caused by SGB and evaluate the associated demographic features, symptoms and oesophageal motility abnormalities. Methods The Oesophageal Physiology Laboratory, Guy’s Hospital, patient database was retrospectively searched for patients diagnosed with GORD in whom SGB was observed. Patient demographic information, symptoms and oesophageal motility abnormalities were collected. The 24 hour pH-impedance studies were analysed for SGB. GORD events closely following SGB (within 6 seconds) were quantified and the acid exposure time and acid/non-acid reflux events occurring after a SGB were calculated when upright and recumbent. Results Forty-six patients with a diagnosis of GORD and SGB were identified (48% female, mean age 50.5 years (range: 29–75), male mean age 52.5 years (29–79)). Ninety-five percent of patients reported heartburn and/or epigastric pain, 81.8% suffered from excessive belching, 63.6% reported regurgitation and 54.5% reported dysphagia. Forty-three percent of patients had a hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS). SGB preceded 22.7% of all reflux events (24.9% upright and 6.6% recumbent) and 26.5% of acid reflux events. On average, over 24 hours, 16.3 reflux events were associated with SGB (13.0 acid and 4.1 non-acid) corresponding to a mean acid exposure time of 17.8 minutes. In this cohort SGB accounted for 17% of acid exposure time (22% upright and 7.4% recumbent). SGB had no effect on the total number of reflux events or the total acid exposure time in 3 patients and in 3 further patients SGB had no effect on the total acid exposure time. SGB caused ≥50% of the total number of reflux events in 3 patients and ≥50% of the total acid exposure time in 5 patients. Patients with a hypotensive LOS did not have a significantly higher total number of reflux events (p = 0.88) or total acid exposure time (p = 0.86). No relationships were seen between the presence of a hiatus hernia and the total number of reflux events (p = 0.43) or acid exposure time (p = 0.16) associated with SGB. Conclusion SGB induced a considerable proportion of reflux events and acid exposure time. In 8 patients SGB caused ≥50% of the total reflux events or overall acid exposure time, and hence these patients may be considered as having behavioural GORD. Behavioural GORD should be diagnosed and treated separately to ‘classical’ GORD. Further work is required to elucidate the cause and pathophysiology of SGB. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Loss of Peristaltic Reserve, Determined by Multiple Rapid Swallows, Is the Most Frequent Esophageal Motility Abnormality in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

We assessed peristaltic reserve using multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) of 111 patients with systemic sclerosis (89 women; ages, 42-64 y). We performed a retrospective analysis of HRM studies that included MRS in patients with systemic sclerosis, performed at 2 tertiary referral centers, and compared data with those from 18 healthy volunteers (controls). HRM findings were analyzed according to the Chicago Classification to provide an esophageal motility diagnosis. Response to MRS was evaluated for the presence of contraction and for augmentation, defined as the distal contractile integral after MRS greater than the median distal contractile integral of 10 supine swallows. Esophageal motility diagnoses included 41% with absent contractility, 31% with normal motility, 23% with ineffective esophageal motility, and 5% that met the criteria for other esophageal motility disorders. Contraction (37%) and peristaltic augmentation (18%) after MRS were observed less frequently in patients with systemic sclerosis than in controls (83% and 100%, respectively). Impaired peristaltic reserve, as assessed with MRS during HRM, is therefore the most common esophageal motility finding among patients with systemic sclerosis.