You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Therapy1 Apr 2014PD24-08 WHICH IS THE BEST TREATMENT FOR HYPOGONADOTROPIC HYPOGONADISM AZOOSPERMIC MEN IN JAPAN? Yoshitomo Kobori, Shigeyuki Ota, Takeshi Shin, Masashi Iijima, Hiroshi Yagi, Gaku Arai, Shigehiro Soh, and Hiroshi Okada Yoshitomo KoboriYoshitomo Kobori More articles by this author , Shigeyuki OtaShigeyuki Ota More articles by this author , Takeshi ShinTakeshi Shin More articles by this author , Masashi IijimaMasashi Iijima More articles by this author , Hiroshi YagiHiroshi Yagi More articles by this author , Gaku AraiGaku Arai More articles by this author , Shigehiro SohShigehiro Soh More articles by this author , and Hiroshi OkadaHiroshi Okada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.1999AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The standard treatment for male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) has not yet been determined. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) treatment for HH in Japanese men and to identify characteristics predictive of spermatogenesis. A multicenter, open-label, retrospective study was performed with combined rhFSH, hMG and hCG treatment to induce spermatogenesis in each idiopathic, acquired and adult onset MHH patients. METHODS Total 137 HH patients were enrolled. Seventy-nine patients with pre-pubertal onset idiopathic HH, forty-two patients with acquired HH and sixteen patients with adult onset idiopathic HH were considered for this study (19-44 years old). All of them were azoospermia before treatment. They received only hCG treatment, hCG + hMG treatment, or hCG +rhFSH treatment. Semen analyses were performed periodically, and pubertal advancement and long-term safety and tolerability were also evaluated. If patients with hCG or hCG + hMG treatment could not succeed in induction of spermatogenesis, hCG + rhFSH was started. RESULTS Spermatozoa with ejaculation was achieved by 16 of 55 (29%) with hCG treatment alone, 7 of 14 (50%) with hGC + hMG treatment, 31 of 35 (89%) with hCG + rhFSH treatment. The group of using rhFSH obtained spermatogenesis in significantly higher rate (p<0.05). Even if sperm was not retrieved with treatment of hCG or hCG + hMG, most patients (over 90%) could achieve spermatogenesis with adding rhFSH. The mean duration to achieve appearance of sperm in the ejaculates were 11.1 months with hCG treatment, 27.2 months with hCG +hMG treatment and 10.7 months with hCG +rhFSH treatment. The most effective doses were 5000 IU of hCG two times weekly and 150 IU of rhFSH two or three times weekly. CONCLUSIONS Long-term treatment of azoospermic HH men using rhFSH, hMG and hCG was effective for stimulating spermatogenesis and is well-tolerated. The combined use of hCG and rhFSH was the most useful in spermatogenesis for male HH patients. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e733 Peer Review Report Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Yoshitomo Kobori More articles by this author Shigeyuki Ota More articles by this author Takeshi Shin More articles by this author Masashi Iijima More articles by this author Hiroshi Yagi More articles by this author Gaku Arai More articles by this author Shigehiro Soh More articles by this author Hiroshi Okada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...