Hypnosis In Medicine Research Articles

Current applications of hypnosis in the field of cardiac electrophysiology

With a growing acceptance of clinical hypnosis in medicine, new fields of application are being explored. Data from recent studies support the use of hypnosis for pain management during procedures, such as ablation of arrhythmias and implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators, management of preoperative anxiety and reduction of postoperative atrial fibrillation. The aim of this review article is to summarize the findings of investigations showing the application of hypnosis in the field of cardiac electrophysiology, to review the rationale for the efficacy of hypnosis in management of cardiac arrhythmias and to highlight possible future directions in clinical applications and scientific perspectives.

The Legitimacy of Hypnosis and its Consistency with Principles of Bioethics

Background and Aim: Although hypnosis is a controversial issue, but most of doctors and psychologists consider it an effective and powerful therapy for a wide range of conditions, such as personality disorders, anxiety and pain. The present study analyzes the legitimacy of hypnosis based on Islamic jurisprudence and four principles of bioethics. Materials and Methods: In this analytical study, the published texts and related articles were purposefully searched and reviewed, and then the jurisprudential reasons about hypnosis as an emerging issue, and its legitimacy based on Islamic jurisprudence and consistency with four principles of bioethics were discussed and analyzed. Findings: There are three jurisprudential views on hypnosis and its utilization. For some jurisprudents, hypnosis is classified as magic, which is forbidden to do so. Some other jurisprudents have allowed the use of hypnosis, if necessary. There is a third view that it is considered as an emerging issue, and a legal and ethical rule must be elicit about it. The principle of respect for autonomy about hypnosis are essentially in conflict with what is in Shari'a but in the three other principles of bioethics, namely, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, these principles are consistent with what has been enshrined in the Shari'a. Conclusion: Given the emergence of the issue of hypnosis, it can be concluded that, based on the rule of no-harm in Islamic jurisprudence and bioethics, the use of hypnosis in medicine is permitted, if necessary. Please cite this article as: Asadi Vanani SR, Mohseni Dehkalani M, Ebrahimi S, Soltani A. The Legitimacy of Hypnosis and its Consistency with Principles of Bioethics. Bioethics Journal 2018; 8(30): 107-117.

Clinical hypnosis for palliative care in severe chronic diseases: a review and the procedures for relieving physical, psychological and spiritual symptoms.

Hypnotic treatment in severe chronic diseases, for pain and symptoms relief, has proven efficacy as adjuvant therapy, and should be offered to any individual, who expresses an interest in this method. While some theorize hypnotizability as a changing attribute of the individual, there is a growing body of literature that indicates hypnotizability may be characterized as a constellation of potentially modifiable attitudes and skills, which are strongly influenced by related factors, as suffering, in severe chronic diseases. In this article, I briefly review representative studies recognizing how clinical hypnosis in medicine is an effective complementary therapy, for pain and symptom's relief in severe chronic diseases and in palliative care. This paper highlights: (I) a scientific review to underline how clinical hypnosis has an important impact on the treatment goals and integration in relieving pain and symptoms; (II) the advanced techniques for effectively relieving pain and symptoms.

50 Years of Hypnosis in Medicine and Clinical Health Psychology: A Synthesis of Cultural Crosscurrents

In 2008, the 50th anniversary of ASCH, hypnosis is used increasingly for healthcare applications in hospitals, clinics, and psychotherapy practice. A substantial body of research demonstrates the efficacy of hypnosis as part of the integrative treatment of many conditions that traditional medicine has found difficult to treat (e.g., Pinnell & Covino, 2000; Elkins, Jensen, & Patterson, 2007). The practice of hypnosis in healthcare has been altered and centrally influenced by the rapid growth of technological medicine in the 1950's, the AIDS epidemic and development of psychoneuroimmunology, revolutionary developments in genetics and neuroimaging technology, and the progression from alternative to integrative medicine. We have come to develop more detailed expectations about the beneficial effects of hypnotic interventions for health problems. We have also come to know that in these populations hypnosis can lead not only to reduced anxiety but also specifically altered physiological parameters.

Empirical findings on the use of hypnosis in medicine: A critical review

Recent changes in health care have been characterized by an increased demand for empirically supported treatments in medicine. Presently, there is moderate support for the integration of hypnotic techniques in the treatment of a number of medical problems. This critical review of the research literature focuses on the empirical research on the effectiveness of hypnotic treatments as adjuncts to medical care for anxiety related to medical and dental procedures, asthma, dermatological diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, hemorrhagic disorders, nausea and emesis in oncology, and obstetrics/gynecology. Wider acceptance of hypnosis as an intervention to assist with medical care will require further research.

The use of hypnosis in medicine: the possible pathways involved.

Hypnosis has been used for many years in the treatment of various medical conditions. Its beneficial effects may be purely subjective at least in some instances such as pain relief, but physiological changes have been observed or measured in others. This article considers the possible pathways which may be involved in mediating such changes, through the concept of mind-body communication, in terms of central nervous system activity, together with autonomic function, neuropeptides and hormones.

Patient attitudes to hypnotherapy in a general medical practice: a brief communication.

Abstract A study to investigate public awareness of hypnotherapy planned to identify sources of information and compare their impact on patient acceptance of hypnosis in medical treatment. A structured questionnaire was presented to a random sample of patients coming to a medical center; the sample was representative of 10% of the total medical center population. 910 people participated and 884 questionnaires were analyzed. 80% of the sample had previously heard of the use of hypnosis in medicine, 36.6% would accept hypnotherapy if recommended by their doctor, 5.5% would refuse treatment by hypnosis, and almost all of the remainder of the sample would request further information before making a decision. There was a significant association between preknowledge of medical hypnosis and acceptance of hypnotherapy as was there between source of information and attitude to treatment. 41% of the sample were unaware of any medical indications for hypnosis.

Hypnosis in Ophthalmology

The author has for many years given a course at the academy on hypnosis in ophthalmologic practice and surgery. On the basis of his experience, he has now published a monograph that should help many physicians deal with various patients. The first chapter contains a delightful short history on hypnosis in medicine. The author then goes on to present the various applications of this method in ophthalmic practice. The degree of hypnosis varies a great deal and most of it is actually a good method to achieve complete relaxation, but it can extend into a deep trance. This is an interesting topic and should be useful to the practicing ophthalmologist.

Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis in Medicine, Dentistry, and Psychology, 2nd ed

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article ArticleNo AccessClinical and Experimental Hypnosis in Medicine, Dentistry, and Psychology, 2nd edJEROME M. SCHNECKJEROME M. SCHNECKSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:1 Apr 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.135.10.1264AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail "Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis in Medicine, Dentistry, and Psychology, 2nd ed." American Journal of Psychiatry, 135(10), p. 1264 Access content To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access. Personal login Institutional Login Sign in via OpenAthens Register for access Purchase Save for later Item saved, go to cart PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry $35.00 Add to cart PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry Checkout Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability. Not a subscriber? Subscribe Now / Learn More PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development. Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.). FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byNone Volume 135Issue 10 October 1978Pages 1264-1264 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 April 2006 Published in print 1 October 1978

The big mistakes: a note.

Abstract In his book, A System of Medical Hypnosis, Ainslie Meares writes, “Most books on hypnosis, from Bernheim to the present time, devote a great deal of space to the description of successful and dramatic cures. These accounts may be of prestige value to the author, and may do something to inform the profession of the potential value of hypnosis in medicine, but these success stories are really of little help to those who would learn the technique of hypnotherapy because the emphasis is always on the success of the treatment rather than on analysis of the psychodynamic mechanisms which brought it about. As in everything else, we learn most from a study of our failures [p. 3].” These comments remain as true today as they were ten years ago. With the notable exception of Meares, few colleagues have been willing to share their errors, allowing us to profit from their experience. Thus, when Dr. Cedercreutz sent along a note describing his experience with one of his patients, I was struck by his generosit...

Hypnosis in medicine.

Hypnosis in medicine.

The question of hypnosis in medical practice.

Excerpt A recent and widespread revival of interest in the use of hypnosis in medicine has aroused a strong and sincere desire on the part of many doctors for a clearer understanding of what hypnos...

Application of hypnosis in medicine.

Application of hypnosis in medicine.

Hypnosis in Medicine. By A. Philip Magonet. London: William Heinemann, Medical Books, Ltd., 1952. Pp. 104. Price 9s. 6d.

Hypnosis in Medicine. By A. Philip Magonet. London: William Heinemann, Medical Books, Ltd., 1952. Pp. 104. Price 9<i>s</i>. 6<i>d</i>.

Hypnosis in Medicine

Hypnosis in Medicine

Hypnosis in Medicine

Hypnosis in Medicine