Hypertrophy Of Future Liver Remnant Research Articles

Liver Vein Deprivation versus Portal Vein Embolization: Retrospective Review of Safety and Effectiveness

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of liver vein deprivation (LVD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients scheduled to undergo liver resection. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 59 patients who underwent either PVE (n = 28) or LVD (n = 31) in preparation for liver resection. The primary outcome was percent change in future liver remnant volume (FLRV). The secondary endpoints were degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR). ResultsLow baseline FLRV and time interval in days between the procedure and follow-up imaging (Ti) positively impacted the primary and secondary endpoints in both groups. Percent change in FLRV was higher in the LVD group (52.8% ± 5.3) than in the PVE group (22.3% ± 3.0, P < .001). DH was also higher in the LVD group (15.4% ± 1.7) than in the PVE group (6.4% ± 0.9, P < .001). KGR did not differ significantly between groups (LVD, 0.54%/d ± 0.06; PVE, 0.35%/d ± 0.1; P = .239). When patients with a baseline standardized FLRV of >35% were excluded from the analysis, the LVD group demonstrated higher values than the PVE group in KGR (0.57%/d ± 0.06 vs 0.29%/d ± 0.05, P < .001), percent change in FLRV (64.2% ± 6.0 vs 25.9% ± 4.3, P < .001), and DH (15.4% ± 1.4 vs 6.6% ± 1.0, P < .001). No adverse events were noted in either group. ConclusionsLVD appears to be safe and may be superior to PVE in inducing hypertrophy of future liver remnant in patients scheduled to undergo surgical resection.

Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR.

The regenerative capacities of the liver and improvements in surgical techniques have expanded the possibilities of resectability. Liver resection is often the only curative treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, despite the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This serious complication (with a 50% mortality rate) can be avoided by better assessment of liver volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this review was to understand and assess clinical, biological, and imaging predictors of PHLF risk, as well as the various hypertrophy techniques, to achieve an adequate FLR before hepatectomy. We reviewed the state of the art in liver regeneration and FLR hypertrophy techniques. The use of new biological scores (such as the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index + albumin-bilirubin [APRI+ALBI] score), concurrent utilization of 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy (HBS), or dynamic hepatocyte contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) for liver volumetry helps predict the risk of PHLF. Besides portal vein embolization, there are other FLR optimization techniques that have their indications in case of risk of failure (e.g., associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, liver venous deprivation) or in specific situations (transarterial radioembolization). There is a need to standardize volumetry and function measurement techniques, as well as FLR hypertrophy techniques, to limit the risk of PHLF.

Radioembolization of HCC and secondary hepatic tumors: a comprehensive review.

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE), also called Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT), has emerged as an effective locoregional therapy for primary and secondary hepatic tumors, utilizing yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres and other agents such as holmium-166 and rhenium-188. TARE has various applications in the management of HCC across different BCLC stages. Radiation segmentectomy, which involves administering high doses of Y90 (>190 Gy), can be both curative and ablative, achieving complete necrosis of the tumor. In contrast, radiation lobectomy involves administering a lower dose of Y90 (80-120 Gy) as a neoadjuvant treatment modality to improve local control and induce future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients who are planned to undergo surgery but have insufficient FLR. Modified radiation lobectomy combines both techniques and offers several advantages over portal vein embolization (PVE). Y90 is also used in downstaging HCC patients outside liver transplantation criteria, as well as bridging those awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Multiple studies and combined analyses were described to highlight the outcomes of TARE and compare it with other treatment modalities, including TACE and sorafenib. Additionally, the review delves into the efficacy and safety of radioembolization in managing metastatic colorectal cancer and other metastatic tumors to the liver. Recent studies have emphasized the role of personalized dosimetry for improved outcomes, and thus we described the different methods used for this purpose. Pretherapy imaging, estimating lung shunt, selection of therapeutic radionuclides, adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness were all discussed as well.

Assessment of Segmentary Hypertrophy of Future Remnant Liver after Liver Venous Deprivation: A Single-Center Study.

Background: Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is a recent radiological technique that has shown promising results on Future Remnant Liver (FRL) hypertrophy. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the segmentary hypertrophy of the FRL after LVD and after portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods: Patients undergoing PVE or LVD between April 2015 and April 2020 were included. The segmentary volumes (seg 4, seg2+3 and seg1) were assessed before and after the radiological procedure. Results: Forty-four patients were included: 26 undergoing PVE, 10 LVD and 8 eLVD. Volume gain of both segment 1 and segments 2+3 was significantly higher after LVD and eLVD than after PVE (segment 1: 27.33 ± 35.37 after PVE vs. 38.73% ± 13.47 after LVD and 79.13% ± 41.23 after eLVD, p = 0.0080; segments 2+3: 40.73% ± 40.53 after PVE vs. 45.02% ± 21.53 after LVD and 85.49% ± 45.51 after eLVD, p = 0.0137), while this was not true for segment 4. FRL hypertrophy was confirmed to be higher after LVD and eLVD than after PVE (33.53% ± 21.22 vs. 68.63% ± 42.03 vs. 28.11% ± 28.33, respectively, p = 0.0280). Conclusions: LVD and eLVD may induce greater hypertrophy of segment 1 and segments 2+3 when compared to PVE.

Transfemoral hepatic vein catheterization reduces procedure time in double vein embolization

BackgroundDouble vein embolization with simultaneous embolization of the portal and hepatic vein aims to grow the future liver remnant in preparation for major hepatectomy. Transvenous hepatic vein embolization is usually done via a transjugular access. The purpose of this study is to describe the transfemoral approach as an alternative option and to discuss potential advantages.ResultsTwenty-three patients undergoing hepatic vein embolization via a transjugular (n = 10) or transfemoral access (n = 13) were evaluated retrospectively. In all cases the portal vein embolization was done first. All procedures were technically successful. There were no peri-interventional complications. Only two patients were not able to proceed to surgery. Standardized future liver remnant hypertrophy was non-inferior with the transfemoral approach compared to the transjugular route. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the transfemoral access group (40 ± 13 min) compared to the transjugular group (67 ± 13 min, p < 0.001).ConclusionTransfemoral hepatic vein embolization is feasible, safe, and faster due to easier catheterization, improved stability, and simpler patient preparation. These findings will need to be validated in larger studies.

Overcome intraoperative difficulties of ALPPS procedure: a single-center outcomes and technical experience.

Recently, the ALPPS (Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) has become widely known to achieve hepatic resection by rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy, but it comes with intraoperative difficulties, followed by increased complications. This study aimed to report the outcomes of an oncology center in a low-income and middle-income country with ALPPS in patients with liver tumors and its technical variants, which were invented to overcome intraoperative difficulties of the ALPPS procedure. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ALPPS from September 2022 to December 2023 was performed. A total of 25 patients underwent the ALPPS procedure: 21 procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 3 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), and 1 for small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC). The mean postoperative stay was 29.6 ± 9.3 days (range 16-58 days). After stage 1, we counted 8 complications, all of grade II; after stage 2, the number of complications was decreased to 3:2 were of grade I and 1 were of grade IIIB. 3 (12%) patients failed to proceed to ALPPS stage 2. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range 2-25), disease recurrence has been recorded in 3 patients (12%), while 1 patient (4%) died, affected by HCC. The entire group's 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 83.3% and 82.5%, respectively. The ALPPS procedure is an approach for large liver tumors with small future liver remnant with acceptable OS and DFS in a low-income and middle-income country.

Safety and Effectiveness of Portal Vein Embolization after Hepatic Arterial Infusion Therapy

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a tool potentially useful for inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with advanced hepatic malignancies who are at high risk of hepatic insufficiency if treated with surgical resection. However, the safety and effectiveness of PVE in the context of patients who have undergone hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) are unknown. This retrospective, single-center study identified 9 patients who underwent PVE after HAI between January 2015 and December 2022. There were no major adverse events, including biliary injury or high-grade liver failure. Analysis showed an increase in standardized FLR from 21.1% (SEM ± 2.4) to 34.8% (SEM ± 2.1) over 9.8 weeks (SEM ± 1.2), with a mean kinetic growth rate of 1.9% (interquartile range, 0.9%–2.4%). Patients who have undergone HAI therapy should not be excluded from consideration of PVE as part of their operative clearance strategy.

Is ALPPS still appropriate for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in an era of targeted agents and immunotherapy?

Therapeutic options for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have limited efficacy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads trans-arterial chemo-embolization (dTACE), portal vein embolization (PVE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared to Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for large or locally advanced HCC.Data regarding clinicopathological details, safety, and oncological outcomes were reviewed for the quadruple therapy (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI) and compared with ALPPS.From 2019 to 2020, 10 patients with large or locally advanced HCC underwent future remnant liver (FRL) modulation (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI: 5; ALPPS: 5). All five dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI cases responded well, with patients #4 and #5 achieving complete tumor necrosis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 5/5. Patients #1-4 underwent hepatectomy, while #5 declined surgery due to complete tumor necrosis. Mean FRL volume increased by 75.3% (range 60.0%-89.4%) in 2-4months, compared to 104.6% (range 51.3%-160.8%) in 21-37days for ALPPS (P = 0.032). Major postoperative complications occurred in 1/5 ALPPS patients. Resection rates were 4/4 for quadruple therapy and 5/5 for ALPPS. 2-year progression free survival for dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI and ALPPS were 5/5 and 3/5, respectively.Quadruple therapy is a feasible, effective strategy for enhancing resectability by downsizing tumors and inducing FRL hypertrophy, with manageable complications and improved long-term prognosis. In addition, it provokes the re-examination of the application of ALPPS in an era of molecular and immune treatments.

Correlation between the liver transection line localization and future liver remnant hypertrophy in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) represent the most prevalent form of secondary liver tumors, and insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) often leads to unresectability. To tackle this challenge, various methods for stimulating liver hypertrophy have been developed including portal vein embolization (PVE), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and the newest one, liver venous deprivation (LVD). ALPPS was thoroughly studied over the last decade and it has been shown to induce rapid and intensive FLR hypertrophy. The objective of this study was to assess whether the localization of the liver transection line during the initial stage of ALPPS correlates with the degree of FLR hypertrophy. A retrospective, multicentric study was conducted, and we analyzed all consecutive patients with CRLMs who underwent ALPPS over the eight-year period. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of resection-right trisectionectomy (ERH) or right hemihepatectomy (RH) respectively. The degree of hypertrophy (DH), its correlation with FLR and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The cohort consisted of 136 patients (72 in the ERH group and 64 in the RH group). Baseline characteristics, hypertrophy interval, and total liver volume showed no significant differences between the groups. DH was greater in the ERH group (83.2% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.025). A strong negative correlation was observed between FLR volume and DH in both groups. Postoperative outcomes and one-year survival were comparable between the groups. FLR hypertrophy is influenced by the localization of the liver transection line in ALPPS. Furthermore, correlation analysis indicated that a smaller estimated FLR is associated with greater DH. No statistical difference in outcomes was noted between the groups.

APRI+ALBI score to select the most suitable future liver remnant hypertrophy concepts for patient

APRI+ALBI score to select the most suitable future liver remnant hypertrophy concepts for patient

Portal vein embolization prior to major hepatectomy: A multidisciplinary approach for advanced liver tumors in Chile

One of the main limitations to achieving a complete tumor resection in patients with technically resectable liver tumors is the presence of a small future liver remnant (FLR). Portal vein embolization (PVE) allows hypertrophy of the non-embolized lobe, reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure. To describe the experience of portal embolization prior to hepatectomy and its effectiveness in converting advanced unresectable liver tumors into resectable tumors. Non-concurrent cohort study. All patients who underwent PVE before hepatectomy between 2016 and 2020 in our center were included. Demographic and diagnostic variables, pre and post-PVE volumes, perioperative variables, and global and disease-free survival were analyzed. Nineteen patients were included. Median age 66 (54-72) years and 57.9% (n= 11) were women. Bilateral metastases were present in 78.9% (n= 15). Sixteen patients (84.2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One patient (5.3%) had a complication after PVE. The median time between embolization and volumetry was 5.3 weeks (4.7-7.1). Median FLR before and after PVE were 19.8% (16.2-27.7) and 30% (25.2-40.5), respectively. The median percentage of hypertrophy was 48% (40.4-76.5). Fifteen patients (78.9%) underwent hepatectomy. Significant complications occurred in 26.6% (n= 4); among them, three patients (20%) presented postoperative liver failure. PVE is safe and effective in promoting FLR hypertrophy in the presence of chemotherapy, allowing patients with advanced liver tumors to undergo surgery with curative intent.

Right portal vein ligation is still relevant for left hemi-liver hypertrophy: results of a comparative study using a propensity score between right portal vein ligation and embolization.

In two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer, future liver remnant (FLR) growth can be achieved using several techniques, such as right portal vein ligation (RPVL) or right portal vein embolization (RPVE). A few heterogeneous studies have compared these two techniques with contradictory results concerning FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare FLR hypertrophy of the left hemi-liver after RPVL and RPVE. This was a retrospective comparative study using a propensity score of patients who underwent RPVL or RPVE prior to major hepatectomy between January 2010 and December 2020. The endpoints were FLR growth (%) after weighting using the propensity score, which included FLR prior to surgery and the number of chemotherapy cycles. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures, the morbidity and mortality, the recourse to other liver hypertrophy procedures, and the number of invasive procedures for the entire oncologic program in intention-to-treat analysis. Fifty-four consecutive patients were retrospectively included and analyzed, 18 in the RPVL group, and 36 in the RPVE group. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After weighting, there was no significant difference between the RPVL and RPVE groups for FLR growth (%), respectively 32.5% [19.3-56.0%] and 34.5% [20.5-47.3%] (p = 0.221). There was no significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes except for the lower number of invasive procedures in RPVL group (median of 2 [2.0, 3.0] in RPVL group and 3 [3.0, 3.0] in RPVE group, p = 0.001)). RPVL and RPVE are both effective to provide required left hemi-liver hypertrophy before right hepatectomy. RPVL should be considered for the simultaneous treatment of liver metastases and the primary tumor.

90Y-/166Ho- ‘Radiation lobectomy’ for liver tumors induces abnormal morphology and impaired drainage of peritumor lymphatics

High-dose unilobar radioembolization, or 'radiation lobectomy' (RL), is an induction therapy that achieves contralateral future liver remnant hypertrophy while simultaneously irradiating the tumor. As such, it may prevent further growth, but it is unknown whether RL affects intrahepatic lymphatics, a major route via which liver tumors disseminate. This was a case-control study conducted at University Medical Center Utrecht. The study compared lymph vessels in livers that had undergone RL (cases) with those in livers that had not undergone RL (controls). Histological samples were acquired from patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between 2017 and 2022. Lymph vessel morphology was analyzed by two researchers using podoplanin, a protein that is expressed in lymphatic endothelium. Invivo liver lymph drainage of radioembolized livers was assessed using intraoperative liver lymphangiography (ILL): during liver surgery, patent blue dye was injected into the liver parenchyma, followed by inspection for staining of perihepatic lymph structures. ILL results were compared to a previously published cohort. Immunohistochemical analysis on post-RL tumor tissues from ten patients with CRLM and nine patients with HCC revealed aberrant morphology of irradiated liver lymphatics when compared to controls (n= 3 per group). Irradiated lymphatics were tortuous (p <0.05), thickened (p <0.05) and discontinuous (p <0.05). Moreover, post-RL lymphatics had larger lumens (1.5-1.7x, p <0.0001), indicating lymph stasis. ILL revealed diminished lymphatic drainage to perihepatic lymph nodes and vessels in irradiated livers when compared to non-radioembolized controls (p= 1.0x10-4). Radioembolization impairs peritumoral lymph vessel function. Further research is needed to evaluate if radioembolization impairs tumor dissemination via this route. Unilobar radioembolization can serve as an alternative to portal venous embolization for patients who are considered unresectable due to an insufficient future liver remnant. This research suggests that radioembolization impairs the function of peritumoral liver lymph vessels, potentially hindering dissemination via this route. These findings provide support for considering unilobar radioembolization over standard portal venous embolization.

Successful two-stage transplant hepatectomy using the ALPPS procedure for advanced hepatocellular cancer

In the presented case, after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular cancer (HCC), the disease progressed in the graft, left lung and bronchopulmonary lymph nodes after 16 months, according to the Milan criteria. Against the background of combined treatment – hepatic artery chemoembolization (HAC), systemic targeted therapy and stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic node of the left lung – HCC in the extrahepatic foci was stabilized. In this situation, we considered resection of the liver transplant as the only therapeutic option that provides a chance for significant prolongation of the patient’s life. However, extensive resection of the right liver lobe seemed unsafe due to a number of limiting factors – borderline functional residual capacity of the remaining liver: future liver remnant (FLR), 599 cm3 (32%); plasma disappearance rate (PDR), 12.3%/min; tumor invasion of the middle hepatic vein basin. In this case, right portal vein branch (RPVB) embolization could promote vicarious hypertrophy of the remaining part of the liver, but the waiting period usually exceeds three to four weeks, and the RPVB was already partially blocked by the tumor at that time. The only option for surgical intervention was, in our opinion, two-stage hepatectomy according to the Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure, despite the absence of literature data on the performance of such operations on a liver transplant. On postoperative day 5 from the first stage, a 799 cm3 FLR hypertrophy was achieved, which allowed to perform the second stage of intervention relatively safely. Competent tactics regarding medication in the intensive care unit (ICU) and renal replacement therapy allowed to cope with sepsis and acute renal failure – the prevailing postoperative complications.

Dose finding study for unilobar radioembolization using holmium-166 microspheres to improve resectability in patients with HCC: the RALLY protocol

BackgroundHigh dose unilobar radioembolization (also termed ‘radiation lobectomy’)—the transarterial unilobar infusion of radioactive microspheres as a means of controlling tumour growth while concomitantly inducing future liver remnant hypertrophy—has recently gained interest as induction strategy for surgical resection. Prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm are lacking. The RALLY study aims to assess the safety and toxicity profile of holmium-166 unilobar radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant.MethodsThe RALLY study is a multicenter, interventional, non-randomized, open-label, non-comparative safety study. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are considered ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant (< 2.7%/min/m2 on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan will be included. A classical 3 + 3 dose escalation model will be used, enrolling three to six patients in each cohort. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated treated non-tumourous liver-absorbed dose (cohorts of 50, 60, 70 and 80 Gy). Secondary objectives are to evaluate dose–response relationships, to establish the safety and feasibility of surgical resection following unilobar radioembolization, to assess quality of life, and to generate a biobank.DiscussionThis will be the first clinical study to assess the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm and may serve as a stepping stone towards its implementation in routine clinical practice.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NL8902, registered on 2020–09-15.

Colorectal liver metastases that survive radioembolization display features of aggressive tumor behavior

BackgroundRadiation lobectomy is a therapeutic approach that involves targeted radiation delivery to induce future liver remnant hypertrophy and tumor control. In patients with colorectal liver metastases, only 30–40% have complete tumor regression. The importance of tumor biology in treatment response remains elusive. MethodsPatients with colorectal liver metastases who received radiation lobectomy were selected from surgical pathology files. Using a machine learning scoring protocol, pathological response was correlated to tumor absorbed dose and expression of markers of radioresistance Ki-67 (proliferation), CAIX (hypoxia), Olfm4 (cancer stem cells) and CD45 (leukocytes). ResultsNo linear association was found between tumor dose and response (ρ < 0.1, P = 0.73 (90Y), P = 0.92 (166Ho)). Response did correlate with proliferation (ρ = 0.56, P = 0.012), and non-responsive lesions had large pools (>15%) of Olfm4 positive cancer stem cells (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0037). Responding lesions (regression grade ≤2) were highly hypoxic compared to moderate and non-responding lesions (P = 0.011). Non-responsive lesions had more tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (3240 cells/mm2 versus 650 cells/mm2), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.08). ConclusionThe aggressive phenotype of a subset of surviving cancer cells emphasizes the importance of prompt resection after radiation lobectomy.

Safety and Efficacy of Liver Venous Deprivation Following Transarterial Chemoembolization Before Major Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of liver venous deprivation (LVD) following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Between January 2021 and December 2022, HCC patients indicated for hepatectomy with initial insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) underwent LVD after TACE to induce preoperative liver hypertrophy. Twenty-seven HCC patients with a median age of 55 years underwent LVD. No TACE or LVD procedure-associated complications occurred, except for 1 case presenting with grade A liver failure after LVD (then recovered after 7 days). The FLR volume was 29.3% (interquartile range [IQR] = 7.5) and 48.9% (IQR = 8.6) of the total liver volume before and after LVD, respectively (p < 0.001). The degree of hypertrophy and FLR hypertrophy rate were 14.8% (IQR = 8.4) and 55.2% (IQR = 36.7), respectively. All 27 patients demonstrated sufficient FLR after LVD (24 patients at three weeks post-LVD, one at six weeks, and two at ten weeks), but only 21 patients accepted surgery. Postoperative histopathology showed 16 patients with cirrhosis and five with mild fibrosis (F1, F2). One patient presented with severe intraoperative bleeding due to damage of left hepatic vein and developed grade C liver failure, then died on day 32 postoperation. LVD following TACE seems to be a safe, effective, and feasible method of inducing significant FLR regeneration in HCC, even in well-selected cirrhotic livers. Comparative studies with a large patient population and multicenter data are needed for further evaluation.

Portal Vein Embolization: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications

AbstractPortal vein embolization (PVE) is performed with the goal of causing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) in patients prior to partial liver resections for either hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic liver tumors. Since its earliest description in 1984, PVE has evolved technically and has proven to be a safe and effective means of causing predictable FLR hypertrophy. PVE allows patients who would have otherwise not been candidates to proceed with safe hepatic resection, particularly extended hepatic resections. Despite advances in equipment and techniques, complications do occur with PVE. This article discusses the indications, outcomes, and complications of PVE while providing historical perspective and technical insights.

Influence of cholestasis on portal vein embolization-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant

PurposeIn the pre-clinical setting, hepatocellular bile salt accumulation impairs liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy. Here, we study the impact of cholestasis on portal vein embolization (PVE)-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR).MethodsPatients were enrolled with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing PVE before a (extended) right hemihepatectomy. Volume of segments II/III was considered FLR and assessed on pre-embolization and post-embolization CT scans. The degree of hypertrophy (DH, percentual increase) and kinetic growth rate (KGR, percentage/week) were used to assess PVE-induced hypertrophy.ResultsA total of 50 patients (31 CRLM, 19 pCCA) were included. After PVE, the DH and KGR were similar in patients with CRLM and pCCA (5.2 [3.3–6.9] versus 5.7 [3.2–7.4] %, respectively, p = 0.960 for DH; 1.4 [0.9–2.5] versus 1.9 [1.0–2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 0.742 for KGR). Moreover, pCCA patients with or without hyperbilirubinemia had comparable DH (5.6 [3.0–7.5] versus 5.7 [2.4–7.0] %, respectively, p = 0.806) and KGR (1.7 [1.0–2.4] versus 1.9 [0.8–2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 1.000). For patients with pCCA, unilateral drainage in FLR induced a higher DH than bilateral drainage (6.7 [4.9–7.9] versus 2.7 [1.5–4.2] %, p = 0.012). C-reactive protein before PVE was negatively correlated with DH (ρ = − 0.539, p = 0.038) and KGR (ρ = − 0.532, p = 0.041) in patients with pCCA.ConclusionsThere was no influence of cholestasis on FLR hypertrophy in patients undergoing PVE. Bilateral drainage and inflammation appeared to be negatively associated with FLR hypertrophy. Further prospective studies with larger and more homogenous patient cohorts are desirable.

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: Basics Interventional Radiologists Need to Know

One of the major reasons for unresectability of the liver is that the remnant liver volume is insufficient to support postoperative liver function. Post-hepatectomy liver insufficiency is one of the most serious complications in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Preoperative portal vein embolization is performed with the aim of inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant and is thought to reduce the risk of liver insufficiency after hepatectomy. We, interventional radiologists, are required to safely complete the procedure to promote future liver remnant hypertrophy as possible and understand portal vein anatomy variations and hemodynamics, embolization techniques, and how to deal with possible complications. The basic information interventional radiologists need to know about preoperative portal vein embolization is discussed in this review.