Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Treatment Research Articles

Optimal hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen for advanced and peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Peritoneal metastasis is one of the most common modes of spread of gastric cancer. Currently, surgical treatment combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and systemic chemotherapy has demonstrated promising outcomes in both the treatment and prevention of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. However, various HIPEC drug regimens are in clinical use, and their efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different HIPEC drug regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer to determine the optimal therapeutic approach. This study conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Patients in the experimental group underwent surgery combined with HIPEC and chemotherapy. The search period covered literature from database inception to June 1, 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to assess overall disease recurrence, peritoneal recurrence, and postoperative morbidity as secondary outcomes. To ensure scientific rigor and transparency, this study has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024533948). A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1092 patients were included. Compared to surgery combined with chemotherapy, the regimens of cisplatin (HRs = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.73), mitomycin C (HRs = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.55-1.79), cisplatin plus fluorouracil (HRs = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.95), and oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (HRs = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.78) all demonstrated benefits in OS. The cisplatin (ORs = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.60) and mitomycin C (ORs = 0.03, 95% CI: 0-0.71) regimens also showed advantages in reducing peritoneal recurrence, with no impact on postoperative morbidity. Importantly, the cisplatin regimen was superior to other regimens in terms of OS and overall disease recurrence, achieving a balance between efficacy and safety. Compared to chemotherapy alone, HIPEC treatment shows significant benefits in OS without a notable disadvantage in postoperative morbidity. Although no single HIPEC regimen demonstrated clear benefits across all outcomes, the cisplatin regimen performed well in multiple aspects, indicating its potential for further research and clinical application. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=533948, identifier CRD42024533948.

Efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer peritoneal metastasis

ObjectivesPancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis presents a challenging prognosis, with limited effective treatment options available. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a treatment strategy for this patient group.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer who underwent CRS + HIPEC treatment at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023. The study focused on assessing clinical features, the incidence of sever adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median OS was 24.2 months, suggesting an improvement over traditional therapies. While SAEs were noted, including two cases of severe complications necessitating additional surgical interventions, no perioperative fatalities were recorded. The overall survival time for patients with CC0/1 was not significantly different from that of patients with CC2/3, and no prognostic predictors were identified.ConclusionsThe combination of CRS and HIPEC appears to be a viable and promising treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer, offering an improved survival rate with manageable safety concerns. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and to explore the long-term benefits of this approach.

Mutational Features and Tumor Microenvironment Alterations in High-Grade Appendiceal Cancers Treated With Iterative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

High-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas (HGAA) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) are associated with poor survival. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a novel treatment approach for unresectable HGAA-PM. However, its influence on immunogenomic profiles has not yet been fully explored. We obtained 79 samples of metastatic peritoneal tumor deposits from patients diagnosed with HGAA and performed whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and immunoprofiling before and after HIPEC. Tumor biopsies were subjected to immunogenomic profiling to detect mutational signatures and immune populations associated with oncologic outcomes. Fifteen patients with HGAA-PMs were included in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (2.7-25.3) and the median overall survival was 11.4 months (4.7-42). Mucin-associated genes (MUC16, MUC3A, and MUC5AC) and titin (TTN) had the highest mutation frequencies. Mutational signatures such as single-base substitution 29 and doublet-base substitution 11 were present in >50% of single-base and double-base mutations. Higher PD-L1 coexpression on CD8+ T cells demonstrated a higher PFS both intratumorally (P = .019) and at the margin (P = .025). HIPEC-associated mutational signatures were identified in HGAA-PMs. Elevated PD-L1+ cytotoxic T-cell populations after HIPEC had better PFS, offering valuable insights for prognostication in the context of HIPEC treatment.

Nomogram to Predict Tube Occlusion During Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.

To investigate the factors contributing to the blockage of perfusion tubes during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) undergoing combined cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment, and to construct a nomogram for predicting the risk of tube occlusion. Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China, from June 2017 to December 2023. Tube occlusion was defined as the inability to achieve 30 minutes of continuous unobstructed perfusion. Statistical methods such as univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and Lasso regression were employed for data analysis. The results revealed that 27% of the 383 hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion treatments resulted in the tube occlusion events. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, CA-125, CA19-9, and pathological type as the independent risk factors. A nomogram predicting the tube occlusion was constructed and validated for its predictive accuracy and clinical utility. This study successfully developed a nomogram to predict the tube occlusion risk during cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment for patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei, providing valuable guidance for clinical practice and aiding in personalised treatment decisions to improve patient prognosis. However, further research is needed to validate the reliability and clinical applicability of the model, as well as to investigate the impact of tube occlusion on treatment outcomes and corresponding management strategies. Pseudomyxoma peritonei, Cytoreductive surgery, Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment, Tube occlusion, Nomogram.

Ex vivo assessment of cellular mass response for personalized therapy selection of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) agents.

3132 Background: Despite progress in the development of HIPEC protocols for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis, agent selection remains largely empiric with few biomarkers for guiding treatment. Ex vivo assessment of drug response using single-cell mass measurements offers a promising option for therapy selection. Previously, we have shown that mass response testing (MRT) is a malignancy- and drug-agnostic means of assessing drug response (1) and can predict a patient’s clinical response to therapy in a range of solid and hematological malignancies (2). Methods: Tissue specimens were collected from patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis as part of an ancillary study for a HIPEC clinical trial (NCT04847063) to explore the feasibility of performing MRT with these specimen types. Briefly, after overnight shipment of viable tumor tissue, tumor cells were isolated and treated with various therapies ex vivo. Single-cell mass distributions of vehicle and drug-treated populations were compared to determine the functional activity of each agent. Results: MRT was attempted for 60 patients with metastatic disease, 10 of whom had peritoneal carcinomatosis and ultimately received HIPEC. The HIPEC cases included histologies such as peritoneal mesothelioma (n=4), colorectal cancer (n=3), ovarian cancer (n=2), and small bowel adenocarcinoma (n=1). In total, 8 out of 10 peritoneal specimens had a sufficiently high tumor cell count, viability, and purity to perform MRT. These specimens displayed clear and statistically distinguishable mass response patterns of response and non-response to several different agents commonly used for HIPEC treatment such as cisplatin, oxaliplatin, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C. Study design:These feasibility results serve as the foundational data for launching a single-site phase II interventional study at the NCI’s Center for Cancer Research. The study will evaluate the potential benefit of personalized treatment regimens determined by MRT for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, particularly mesothelioma, a context where therapeutic options have relative equipoise in clinical efficacy. Tumor biopsies will be obtained via laparoscopy prior to HIPEC and submitted to a CLIA-certified lab for MRT to assess the responses of various clinically acceptable agents. The HIPEC regimen will be selected based on these MRT results returned within two days of sample collection. Enrolled patients will then undergo cytoreduction and HIPEC, and progression-free and overall survival will be monitored. As a single-arm, non-randomized trial, patient responses will be compared with a matched synthetic control to assess the impact of MRT on efficacy of HIPEC regimens. Conclusions: MRT is feasible for peritoneal carcinomatosis tissues, with future studies focusing on its role in guiding HIPEC treatment. 1. Nat Comm Bio,2022. 2. JCO PO, 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT04847063 .

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of bowel function recovery after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for metastatic cancers of the abdomen and pelvis.

e23225 Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) to treat metastatic tumors of the abdomen and pelvis. The risk factors of GI dysmotility after HIPEC and CRS are not well known. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review including all patients who had undergone HIPEC and CRS for metastatic cancer of the abdomen and pelvis from 2016-2023 to assess the prognostic factors of bowel function after HIPEC and CRS treatment. Patients were classified into high or low peritoneal cancer burden by a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score. Statistics: Categorical variables were summarized by count and percentage and continuous variables. Comparisons of categorical and continuous covariables were conducted using Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: 195 patients met the study criteria. Duration of bowel recovery time in the High PCI was significantly higher than in the Low PCI group (median 11.5 days vs 9 days, p = 0.027). Persistent bowel dysfunction at day 30 was (7.47 x) associated with malnutrition (p = 0.001) and (6.95 x) a venting G Tube (p = 0.032) and history of radiation (p = 0.019) and Pre-OP Opioid Use (p = 0.01). Metoclopramide, Erythromycin and Mu Antagonists were used in 32%, 4.7% and 1.2% respectively of patients with bowel dysfunction. Conclusions: Patients with a high PCI score had a statistically significant longer duration of bowel dysfunction. Malnutrition and a history of radiation were statistically higher in patients with prolonged bowel dysfunction. Use of prokinetics and mu receptor antagonists was uncommon. [Table: see text]

Analysis of causes and prognostic impact of tube occlusion during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei

BackgroundAppendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), a rare tumor from mucinous appendiceal origins, is treated with Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, tubing blockages during HIPEC treatment pose a common challenge, impeding the smooth progression of therapy. Few studies to date have explored the incidence and risk factors of tube occlusion during HIPEC in patients with appendiceal PMP, as well as its adverse impact on postoperative complications.MethodsFrom October 2017 to June 2023, a total of 80 patients with appendiceal PMP undergoing combined CRS and HIPEC were included in this study. Tubing blockage events were strictly defined, with patients experiencing blockages during HIPEC treatment allocated to the study group, while those with unobstructed perfusion were assigned to the control group. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding post-HIPEC health assessments and occurrence of complications. Risk factors for luminal occlusion during closed HIPEC procedures were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis of data from 303 HIPEC treatments.ResultsTubing blockages occurred in 41 patients (51.3%). The study group experienced prolonged gastrointestinal decompression time (4.1 ± 3.0 vs. 2.5 ± 1.7 days, P = 0.003) and prolonged time to bowel movement (6.1 ± 2.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.022) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. The 1-year survival rate postoperatively was 97%, and the 3-year survival rate was 81%, with no association found between tubing blockage and poorer survival. Additionally, In 303 instances of HIPEC treatment among these 80 patients, tube occlusion occurred in 89 cases (89/303, 29.4%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed age, diabetes, hypertension, and pathology as independent risk factors for tube occlusion.ConclusionTubing blockages are a common occurrence during HIPEC treatment, leading to prolonged postoperative gastrointestinal functional recovery time. When patients are elderly and have concomitant hypertension and diabetes, along with a histological type of low-grade mucinous tumor, the risk of tube occlusion increases. However, this study did not find a significant correlation between tubing blockage and the incidence of postoperative complications or overall patient survival.

In vitro 3D microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model for testing different oxaliplatin-based HIPEC regimens.

Treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is still evolving. Conducting a randomized trial is challenging due to the high heterogeneity in the presentation of peritoneal disease and various surgical approaches. Biological research may facilitate more rapid translation of information into clinical practice. There is an emerging need for a preclinical model to improve HIPEC treatment protocols in terms of drug doses and treatment durations. The aim of the study is to design a tool that serves as an invitro three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model to test the efficacy of different HIPEC treatments. We determined the effects of current therapy options using a 3D static disease model on human colon carcinoma cell lines (HCT 116) and transforming growth factor-β1 induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) HCT 116 lines at 37 °C and 42 °C for 30, 60, and 120 min. We determined oxaliplatin's half maximal inhibitory concentrations in a 3D static culture by using viability assay. Clinical practices of HIPEC were applied in the developed model. EMT-induced HCT 116 cells were less sensitive to oxaliplatin treatment compared to non-induced cells. We observed increased cytotoxicity when increasing the temperature from 37 °C to 42 °C and extending the treatment duration from 30 to 120 min. We found that 200 mg/m2 oxaliplatin administered for 120 min is the most effective HIPEC treatment option within the framework of clinic applications. The tool map provide insights into creating more realistic pre-clinical tools that could be used for a patient-based drug screening.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): New Approaches and Controversies on the Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery has been extensively studied in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, and it holds promise as a therapeutic strategy, but its role remains elusive. The aim of this study was to assess the existing evidence for the use or not of HIPEC in primary debulking surgery (PDS), interval debulking surgery (IDS), and recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), evaluated in terms of survival rates and post-surgical morbidity. Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane, and Medscape were systematically searched for any article comparing the use of HIPEC treatment with any other therapy in patients with ovarian cancer in PDS, IDS, and ROC. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. We only considered English-language published studies. We included 14 studies, including two RCTs with a total of 1813 women, published between 2003 and 2023 with a recruitment period between 1998 and 2020. In PDS, there were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between HIPEC and controls [MD -5.53 months [95% CI -19.91 to 8.84 months]; I2 = 96%]. Conversely, in patients treated with NACT, pooled results showed a significant survival advantage in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the combined HIPEC plus IDS group rather than surgery alone [PFS: MD 4.68 months (95% CI 3.49 to 5.86 months, I2 = 95%); OS: MD 11.81 months (95% CI 9.34 to 14.27 months); I2 = 97%]. Concerning ROC patients, pooled MD did not show either a significant PFS difference between intervention and controls [MD 2.68 months (95% CI 433 to 9.70 months); I2 = 95%], and OS significant difference (MD 6.69 months [95% CI -9.09 to 22.47 months]; I2 = 98%). Severe post-operative complications (≥grade 3) were available in 10 studies, accounting for 1108 women. Overall, there was a slightly but significantly increased risk with the combined approach compared to controls [RR 1.26 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.55); I2 = 0%]. The combination of HIPEC with cytoreductive surgery prolongs OS and PFS in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after NACT with acceptable morbidity. However, additional trials are still needed to determine the effectiveness of HIPEC in primary and recurrence settings. In the era of personalized medicine, the correlation between the efficacy of HIPEC and biological and molecular findings represents a challenge for the future of ovarian cancer.

Long-term survival in patients with PMP: a single-institutional retrospective study from China

BackgroundAs the standard treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can significantly prolong the survival of PMP patients, and some patients can even achieve long-term survival (LTS) or clinical cure. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological and treatment features of PMP patients with LTS and to explore the survival benefit factors of PMP patients.MethodsThe clinicopathological and prognostic data of PMP patients who received CRS + HIPEC at our center from December 2004 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. PMP patients were divided into LTS group (≥ 10 years) and short-term survival (STS) group (< 5 years) according to the length of natural history. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the beneficial factors of PMP patients with LTS.ResultsA total of 609 patients with PMP received CRS + HIPEC treatment at our center. Two-hundred one patients with PMP were included in the study after screening, including 39 patients (19.4%) in the LTS group and 162 patients (80.6%) in the STS group. In STS group and LTS group, median overall survival based on natural history was 29.2 (2.4–59.9) vs. 138.9 (120.3–416.7) months. Univariate analysis revealed 8 factors (P < 0.05) with statistically significant differences between the two groups: gender, chemotherapy history, previous surgical score, Karnofsky Performance Status score, pathological diagnosis, lymphatic metastasis, peritoneal cancer index, and completeness of cytoreduction (CC). Multivariate analysis identified only two factors independently associated with LTS of PMP patients: CC and pathological diagnosis.ConclusionComplete CRS and pathological features are two key factors affecting LTS in PMP patients.

HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer Is the Future… and Always Will Be? Results from a Spanish Multicentric Survey.

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death due to gynecological tumors in the female population. Despite optimal first-line treatment, including cytoreduction and platinum-based systemic chemotherapy, recurrences are frequent. The use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been criticized, especially because of the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with convincing results to support the use of HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination. In 2018, the clinical trial published by Van Driel et al. reported improved outcomes in favor of HIPEC treatment with cisplatin. In this study, we conducted a national survey within the Spanish group of peritoneal surgical oncology (Grupo Español de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, GECOP) to explore the impact of the results of this RCT on clinical practice. A total of 33 groups completed the survey. Routine clinical practice was not changed in 28 of the 33 groups (85%) based on the results of the Van Driel trial. Despite the results of this RCT, most groups considered that more RCTs are needed and that, in the future, HIPEC may become the standard of care. In conclusion, the results from RCTs evaluating HIPEC treatment in patients with ovarian cancer has not been transferred to clinical practice.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Improves the Prognostication of Patients with Disseminated Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms (Pseudomyxoma Peritonei).

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) with disseminated disease (pseudomyxoma peritonei) are heterogeneous tumors with variable clinicopathologic behavior. Despite the development of prognostic systems, objective biomarkers are needed to stratify patients. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it remains unclear if molecular testing can improve the evaluation of disseminated AMN patients. Targeted NGS was performed for 183 patients and correlated with clinicopathologic features to include American Joint Committee on Cancer/World Health Organization (AJCC/WHO) histologic grade, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, and overall survival (OS). Genomic alterations were identified for 179 (98%) disseminated AMNs. Excluding mitogen-activated protein kinase genes and GNAS due to their ubiquitous nature, collective genomic alterations in TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, and the mTOR genes were associated with older mean age, higher AJCC/WHO histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, regional lymph node metastasis, and lower mean PCI (p < 0.040). Patients harboring TP53, SMAD4, ATM, CDKN2A, and/or mTOR gene alterations were found to have lower OS rates of 55% at 5 years and 14% at 10 years, compared with 88% at 5 years and 88% at 10 years for patients without the aforementioned alterations (p < 0.001). Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, genomic alterations in TP53, SMAD4, ATM, CDKN2A, and/or the mTOR genes in disseminated AMNs were a negative prognostic factor for OS and independent of AJCC/WHO histologic grade, PCI, CC score, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment (p = 0.006). Targeted NGS improves the prognostic assessment of patients with disseminated AMNs and identifies patients who may require increased surveillance and/or aggressive management.

A case report of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm in perforated appendicitis: literature review, acute surgery and later additional HIPEC treatment to prevent pseudomixoma peritonei

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) accounts less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal neoplasm. Early stage AMNs are usually incidentally diagnosed on a surgical specimen after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. In this study, we reported a 42-year-old female presented complaining right lower abdominal pain for 3 days. Abdominal US revealed inflamed appendix surrounded by ipo-anechoic area of 3 cm, with increased thickness of near ileus. Intraoperatively a fistula between appendix and terminal ileum was found; for that reason, a right hemicolectomy was performed. Histopathology indicated a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs). Four months later the patient underwent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with C-mitomycin and Cisplatin and was followed up for 6 months with no disease progression, confirmed by CT scan. At present there is not a consensus about LAMNs treatment, due to the scarcity of cases. Consensus statement of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group published in 2020 seems to be the best guideline available nowadays; Recommendations are provided based on three Delphi voting rounds with GRADE-based questions amongst a panel of 80 worldwide PMP experts. Given the rarity of these pathologies, each clinical case and longer follow up are important. Appropriate surgery-based treatment followed by HIPEC could contribute to the improvement of prognosis and severe outcomes among these patients. In our opinion patients affected by LAMN should receive prophylactic HIPEC treatment in order to achieve the greatest survival benefit even if they run the risk of overtreatment.

Extreme cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in treatment of peritoneal metastasis.

It was aimed to define the oncologic concept of "extremeness" in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) to determine morbidity-mortality results and final oncologic outcomes. Prospectively recorded data of 666 patients with peritoneal metastases who had undergone CRS/HIPEC between 2007 and 2020 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups as extreme (n= 371) and non-extreme (n= 295). Extreme CRS was defined as resection of ≥5 major organs or creation of ≥2 bowel anastomoses or peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI)≥ 15 or re-cytoreductive surgery. More CC-1 or CC-2 cytoreduction (p <.001), increased mortality and morbidity (p <.001), prolonged operative time (p <.001), increased intraoperative erythrocyte suspension (p <.001), albumin (p <.001), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (p <.001), and post-operative erythrocyte suspension (p <.001) usage were found in the extreme CRS/HIPEC group. Operative time, CC-1 or CC-2 cytoreduction, presence of ostomy, development of infection, and use of intra-operative albumin and FFP were found to be independent prognostic factors in Cox regression analysis. Three and five-year survival rates were significantly lower in the extreme CRS/HIPEC group (p <.001). High-volume peritoneal metastatic disease can be completely resected with extreme cytoreduction in carefully selected patients responsive to chemotherapy. Since the significant morbi-mortality related to the treatment of peritoneal metastasis is a real concern, it should be considered in experienced complex cancer centers that provides relatively better oncological outcomes compared to conventional treatments.

Mechanistic Insights on Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is an aggressive disease of the female reproductive system and a leading cause of cancer death in women. Standard of care includes surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, yet patients continue to experience a high rate of recurrence and metastasis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) treatment in highly selective patients extends overall survival by nearly 12 months. The clinical studies are highly supportive of the use of HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian cancer, though the therapeutic approach is limited to academic medical centers. The mechanism underlying HIPEC benefit remains unknown. The efficacy of HIPEC therapy is impacted by several procedural and patient/tumor factors including the timing of surgery, platinum sensitivity, and molecular profiling such as homologous recombination deficiency. The present review aims to provide insight into the mechanistic benefit of HIPEC treatment with a focus on how hyperthermia activates the immune response, induces DNA damage, impairs DNA damage repair pathways, and has a synergistic effect with chemotherapy, with the ultimate outcome of increasing chemosensitivity. Identifying the points of fragility unmasked by HIPEC may provide the key pathways that could be the basis of new therapeutic strategies for ovarian cancer patients.

Colorectal cohort analysis from the Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Metastasis (ICARuS) clinical trial.

160 Background: ICARuS is a randomized phase II, multicenter trial to evaluate the relative efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin C vs. Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) with floxuridine (FUDR), after cytoreductive surgery (CRS), for the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal (CRC) or appendiceal cancer (AC). PRODIGE7 results failed to demonstrate benefit of HIPEC therapy after complete gross resection of CRC PM, prompting termination of CRC accrual and early cohort analysis. Methods: Patients with isolated, confirmed PM were eligible for 1:1 randomization to CRS plus HIPEC with mitomycin C or CRS plus EPIC with FUDR. Patients were stratified by recent systemic chemotherapy and disease (AC vs. CRC). The trial was originally powered to evaluate 212 patients for a 20% gain in a primary endpoint of 3-year progression free survival (PFS: HR = 1.75). Results: Seventy-five CRC patients were included between 4/2013 and 12/2018 for HIPEC (N = 40) or EPIC (N = 35) treatment. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. After a median follow up of 36 months, the median PFS was 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.3-11.1) in the HIPEC arm and 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.1-21.9) in the EPIC arm, HR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.42-1.14) p = 0.14. In the 42 left-sided primary cancers, the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.4-17.7) in the HIPEC arm and 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.1-NR) in the EPIC arm, HR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.29-1.22) p = 0.14. In the 33 right-sided primary cancers, the median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.5-14.1) in the HIPEC arm and 8 months (95% CI: 5.8-24.1) in the EPIC arm, HR = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.39-1.64) p = 0.53. PFS was significantly better in the EPIC arm among patients with BRAF wildtype (WT) tumors and patients with higher PM burden (PCI &gt; 7). There was no difference between HIPEC and EPIC in the primary toxicity endpoint of complications grade 3 or above (23 vs. 34%, p = 0.3). Conclusions: Three-year PFS did not significantly differ between treatment arms. The lack of survival benefit of HIPEC in the entire cohort and in subset analysis is consistent with the findings of PRODIGE7. ICARuS remains open to accrual for AC. These data support further investigation of the potential benefit of EPIC with CRS in carefully selected patients with CRC PM. Clinical trial information: NCT01815359 .

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Young Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer—An Asian Experience

IntroductionCytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are accepted treatment options for patients with cancers associated with the abdominal region. Currently, there are insufficient data that evaluate the effectiveness of these therapeutic options in young patients who have peritoneal metastasis (PM) originating from colorectal cancer. MethodsIn this investigation, we evaluated perioperative data, clinicopathological manifestations, and survival consequences in 46 younger (≤50 y) patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC therapy between 2017 June and 2019 June and then compared these data with 94 older patients (aged >50 y). ResultsCompared with older patients, younger patients had a higher synchronous PM incidence (78.3% versus 51.1%, P < 0.001) and were more likely to exhibit signet ring histology and mucinous (29.8% versus 60.9%; P < 0.001). The cancer-specific survival rates after CRS and HIPEC treatment were similar in both age sets. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that mucinous/signet adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.02-4.74; P = 0.044) and rectal origin (hazard ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.11-5.67; P = 0.027) were independent risk factors for a lower cancer-specific survival rate. ConclusionsYounger (age ≤50 y) patients who have PM of colorectal cancer origin often present synchronous PM, which is less commonly observed in older patients. Tumors in younger patients are more aggressive; however, post-CRS and HIPEC treatment, the benefits are similar to those observed in older cohorts.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer based on laboratory tests is safe: a single Chinese center analysis

PurposeAbout 15%—40% of gastric cancer patients have peritoneal metastasis, which leads to poor prognosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered to be an effective treatment for these patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of HIPEC in patients with gastric cancer diagnosed from laboratory tests.MethodsThe clinical and pathological data of 63 patients with gastric cancer who underwent HIPEC in 2017–2021 were prospectively recorded. Fifty-five patients underwent cytoreductive surgery + HIPEC, and eight patients received HIPEC alone. The factors associated with HIPEC safety and efficacy were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival.ResultsThe average patient age was 54.84 years and 68.3% of patients were male. Moreover, 79.4% of patients had a peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) score of ≤ 7 and 61.9% had a completeness of cytoreduction score of 0. Because of peritoneal metastasis, 29 patients (46.03%) were classified as stage IV. Laboratory tests showed no differences in pre-HIPEC blood test results compared to post-HIPEC results after removing the effects of surgery. HIPEC treatment did not cause obvious liver or kidney damage. Serum calcium levels decreased significantly after HIPEC (P = 0.0018). The Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score correlated with the patient’s physical function and improved after HIPEC (P = 0.0045). In coagulation tests, FDP (P < 0.0001) and D-dimer (P < 0.0001) levels increased significantly and CA242 (P = 0.0159), CA724 (P < 0.0001), and CEA (P < 0.0014) levels decreased significantly after HIPEC. Completeness of cytoreduction score was an independent prognostic factor. HIPEC did not show a survival benefit in patients with gastric cancer (P = 0.5505).ConclusionHIPEC is a safe treatment for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis based on the laboratory tests. However, the efficacy of this treatment on gastric-derived peritoneal metastases requires further confirmation.

420P The role of HIPEC in the management of gastrointestinal and biliary tract malignancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized data

The introduction of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was hoped to transform the management of peritoneal metastases, paving the way for pioneering research. Although, a plethora of published studies on the technique exist, conclusive results stemming from randomized data remain elusive. The aim of this study is to assess the cumulative comprehensive available evidence for the use vs non-use of HIPEC treatment in gastrointestinal and biliary tract (GI) malignancies and set the current standpoint of GI HIPEC research both for prevention (adjuvant) and treatment (metastatic) of peritoneal metastases.

Current status of surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer

Cytoreductive surgery, often in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been instrumental in improving the survival of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of complete cytoreduction, while the role of the HIPEC treatment remains unclear. An oxaliplatin-based HIPEC over 30 min could not achieve any clear benefits in studies on colorectal cancer, neither in the therapeutic nor in the prophylactic setting, but caused relevant side effects and increased the morbidity. The negative results of these studies with respect to oxaliplatin-based HIPEC require critical appraisal; however, they should by no means be regarded as ageneral setback for surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases and be misunderstood as ageneral failure of this treatment. While HIPEC after complete surgical cytoreduction of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer requires further research, cytoreductive surgery should still be regarded as ahighly effective treatment for suitable patients with limited abdominal tumor dissemination.