Guidelines should be used for clinical decisions about although it remains debatable whether ‘dry weight’ individual patients. However, most of the available was really achieved in all of these patients [4,5]. guidelines are based on randomized clinical trials which only provide a statistical prediction of the likely effect of an intervention, usually based on the ‘average’ Effect of hypertension on survival outcome, aggregated across all the heterogeneous patients participating in the trial. Heterogeneity due to The well established concept that hypertension is a the stage of the disease, its severity, organ complica- risk factor for death both in the general population tion, comorbid conditions etc., together with exclusion and in dialysis patients has recently been questioned of the patients with major complications from the trial, by independent studies [4–9] showing that low prelimit the information generated by such trials for a dialysis systolic BP is associated with increased precise prediction of outcome for an individual patient. adjusted mortality risk. No association with elevated Although these limitations may be partially circum- mortality risk has been observed for pre-dialysis sysvented by the clinical experience and pathophysiolog- tolic hypertension. A number of explanations may be ical knowledge of clinicians or experts (in the case of offered for this rather unexpected finding: (i) it may a guideline), personal bias is almost inevitable. A be an iatrogenic effect due to overmedication; (ii) all comprehensive approach to the issue of hypertension the studies were carried out in the USA on patients has recently been published [1]. The present review with an overall poor prognosis. The influence of summarizes the most important aspects discussed in expected survival is indeed crucial. The beneficial effect that review and, in particular, addresses some specific of BP reduction may need several years to become topics whcih, in the opinion of the Medical Expert visible, and this may not be detectable if life expectancy Group, are rather relevant. is only 2–3 years; (iii) older malnourished patients have lower BP and shorter survival; and (iv) the presence of overt or not fully developed heart failure Prevalence or disease may lower BP and survival. The Cox proportional hazard used in some of these studies may be The prevalence of hypertension varies according to the inadequate to correct for all these confounding factors. degree and the cause of renal failure in chronic renal insufficiency (CRI ) or according to the type of dialytic treatment, haemodialysis ( HD) or peritoneal dialysis Pathophysiological basis for management (PD). However, the prevalence of hypertension is much greater in the CRI population (60–100%) than in the In these clinical conditions, it is still not known if general population. With the remarkable exception of hypertension is caused by inappropriate secretion of Tassin, France, where >90% of patients achieve norm- renin for the status of body sodium and water, or if otension without anti-hypertensive medication [2], the other renal or extra-renal factors are involved. A control of hypertension in HD patients is rather poor correct answer to this question is crucial not only for despite administration of anti-hypertensive drugs. This the understanding of the pathogenesis of hypertension poor control has also been documented with 24 h but also for a correct therapeutical approach. ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring where a There are close interrelationships among the various feedback loops regulating BP (renal, hormonal, haemo
Read full abstract