Hypersensitivity Reactions In Patients Research Articles

Paclitaxel hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) rate: Titrated versus non-titrated infusions among gynecologic oncology patients.

e23240 Background: Paclitaxel is a common chemotherapeutic agent used for treatment of various cancers, and is associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HSR). An HSR is mostly likely to occur during first or second infusions. Prior studies have suggested that performing Paclitaxel infusions without titration may be safe for the majority of patients, but increase in number of HSRs. At our institution, Paclitaxel infusions without titration was implemented around April 2023. Our aim was to evaluate the rate of HSR in Paclitaxel infusions without titration among gynecologic patients. Methods: This was a retrospective review of hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving Paclitaxel at the titrated rate versus the full rate from May 2022 through November 2023. Patients had newly diagnosed gynecologic cancers (ovarian, uterine, cervical), who presented for their first or second Paclitaxel infusions. Patients previously treated with Paclitaxel for any reason were excluded. Results: 145 patients were included in this study, each with one (4%) or two (96%) infusions, for a total of 281 infusion visits. There were 176 infusions with Paclitaxel dose titration (62.6%), and 105 infusions at full rate (37.4%). HSRs occurred in 19% of the full rate Paclitaxel infusions and in 11.9% of titrated Paclitaxel infusions (OR 1.74 [95% CI 0.89 – 3.38]; p = 0.10). When stratifying by first or second infusion, the HSR rate increased significantly for full rate second infusion to 22.4%, compared to 8.3% for titrated infusions (OR 3.18 [95% CI 1.14 – 8.86]; p = 0.026). Grade 3 or greater infusion reactions occurred in 45% of full rate infusion and in 14.2% of titrated infusion reactions (OR 4.91 [95% CI 1.08 – 22.14]; p = 0.0038). There was no difference in timing of hypersensitivity reactions in relation to initiation of Paclitaxel infusion. Conclusions: Overall, the HSR rate was higher with full rate first infusions, and significantly increased during the second infusion with full rate Paclitaxel. Additionally, Grade 3 infusion reactions were more likely to be seen with full rate infusions. There is significant variability in Paclitaxel infusion; further studies to determine optimal infusion rates are warranted.

Prior immune checkpoint inhibitors may enhance severe hypersensitivity related to selpercatinib in RET fusion gene-positive lung cancer

Selpercatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for RET-fusion gene-positive lung cancer, can induce hypersensitivity, potentially exacerbated by prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We present a case of severe toxicity following selpercatinib treatment in a 58-year-old female with lung adenocarcinoma, refractory to previous treatments including pembrolizumab. Symptoms included fever, rash, and multiorgan failure indicative of grade 4 hypersensitivity. Treatment involved platelet transfusion, heparin therapy, and prednisolone, leading to improvement upon selpercatinib cessation. This case highlights the importance of monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with selpercatinib, especially following prior ICI therapy.

Prevalence of Hypersensitivity Reaction in Patients Attending Selected Diagnostic Centers NOVA/SOMLAB in Benadir Region, Somalia

Background: The immune system plays a crucial role in maintaining health and protecting the human body against microbial invasions. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to assess the prevalence of hypersensitivities reaction in allergic patient attending selected diagnostic centers. Methodology: This cross- sectional was performed at selected hospitals. The study was carried out from 01st August 2023 to 30th November 2023 at the Immunology department of Nova Diagnostic and Research Institute, Somalia. There 300 samples were included in this study. Questionnaire and investigation (Sample Testing) was used as the main instrument for collecting patient socio-demographic profile and laboratory test were done at Nova diagnostic center. Results: A total 300 participants were enrolled in this study. Among the 300 the predominant the prevalence of respondents was high which was 273(91%) cases and most of the participants were Banana allergic which was 215 (71.7%) cases. Maximum cases were from age group of 2-20 years (48%) and followed by 21-39 years (22%), 40-58 years (17.67%) and >58 years (12.33%). There was a statistically significant correlation between allergic status and education (P=0.003), but not between allergic status and age group (P=00.219) or gender (P=0.456). Conclusion: The study revealed a significant correlation between allergic status and education, indicating that the majority of participants were allergic to bananas. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases, December 2023;10(2):85-91

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions in patients with colorectal cancer

Introduction Oxaliplatin is an anticancer drug used primarily for cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, and oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reaction is a rare but serious side effect. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods This retrospective study included 280 patients who developed oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions and 476 patients who did not. Results Logistic regression analysis indicated that a history of allergy (odds ratio (OR) = 2.232, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.209, 4.119), P = .010), previous oxaliplatin exposure (OR = 8.081, 95% CI (3.024, 21.593), P < .001), and chemotherapy regimen (OR = 2.148, 95% CI (1.411, 3.271), P < .001) were risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. These reactions averaged 7.29 ± 2.78 (median 7, 1–16) cycles, with a mean cumulative dose of 589.53 ± 274.43 mg. Grade 2 oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions were the most common, occurring in 197 patients (70.4%), followed by grade 3 reactions in 68 patients (24.3%), and grade 4 reactions in 9 patients (3.2%). The most common symptom of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions was itching (211 patients, 75.4%), followed by facial flushing (133 patients, 47.5%), and chest discomfort (77 patients, 27.5%). Conclusions We identified a history of allergy to previous oxaliplatin exposure and chemotherapy regimens as risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. Healthcare providers should be aware of the risk factors for oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions and carefully monitor patients receiving oxaliplatin.

Iron sucrose hypersensitivity reactions in patients within the cancer care setting.

397 Background: As a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, we manage a wide variety of patient care, from treatment to supportive measures. In the first three months of 2023, our safety event reporting software recorded 30 iron sucrose reactions, more than the three reactions reported from July to November 2022. This increase triggered our medication safety team to focus on identifying the cause of these reactions to improve patient safety. Methods: A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who received IV iron sucrose and experienced a hypersensitivity reaction between July 2021 and March 2023 at the University of Kansas Cancer Center. The goal of the review was to identify potential risk factors for these adverse events. The chart review first investigated reaction type and symptoms, then the manufacturer, and finally the dose. Results: We identified 40 patients who experienced 44 reactions to iron sucrose from July 2021 to March 2023. Delayed reactions were observed in 68% of patients (n = 30), and 52% of patients (n = 23) had received premedication before their infusion. 25% of patients (n = 11) required an emergency department visit, and three were admitted to inpatient care. 80% of reactions (n = 35) followed a dose of iron sucrose greater than 300 mg. 60% of patients (n = 24) had previously tolerated iron infusions, with 23% (n = 9) previously receiving iron sucrose at a lower dose and 45% (n = 18) previously receiving a different iron infusion. Conclusions: We found that higher doses of iron sucrose were associated with an increased risk of reaction. Based on this finding, we proposed to our Cancer Center Medication Safety Subcommittee that a maximum dose of 300 mg should be considered for patients who receive iron sucrose infusions to improve patient safety. A rapid iterative change in dosing was implemented and has resulted in a reduction in iron sucrose reactions to previously observed numbers. This reduction in reactions further supports our initial findings and has improved patient safety across our patient care sites.

Standardized Titration Protocol Reduces the Incidence of Paclitaxel Infusion-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions.

Infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions with paclitaxel are common despite the use of dexamethasone and diphenhydramine premedications. Paclitaxel titration protocols that may reduce reactions are empirically derived from clinical observations, and there are no phase III trials that confirm superiority of any management recommendations. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency and severity of hypersensitivity reactions associated with a recently initiated standardized paclitaxel titration protocol verses standard-of-care (SOC) infusion protocols. This was a retrospective review of hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving paclitaxel infusions at five ambulatory infusion centers using a standardized titration protocol (February 2021 to April 2021) versus SOC paclitaxel (November 2018 to December 2019). Patients were age 18 years or older and presented for their first or second infusions. The primary study measure was the rate of hypersensitivity reactions. Secondary evaluations included the timing of the reaction after the start of the infusion, use of premedications, and severity of reactions. A total of 451 patients were included in this study. Eighty-four (18.6%) patients were identified in the titration protocol group and 367 (81.4%) patients in the SOC group. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 4.8% of the titration group and 18.3% of the SOC group (odds ratio [OR], 0.224; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.74; P = .002). Grade 3 or greater infusion reactions were 0% in the titration group versus 18% in the SOC group (OR, 0.28; P < .008). Reactions occurred later with the titration protocol, compared with the SOC paclitaxel infusion. Finally, no differences were observed in the use of appropriate premedications. A standardized paclitaxel titration protocol was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving their first and second infusions. A prospective randomized trial is needed to validate these observations.

Lack of benefit from premedication for pegylated asparaginase during pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma therapy: A side-by-side comparison.

Pegylated l-asparaginase (PEG) is integral to treatment regimens for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to PEG are common and can preclude continued administration. Data supporting recommendations for universal premedication (UPM) prior to PEG infusion to reduce incidence of HSRs are limited; UPM has become common practice. Two free-standing children's hospitals independently implemented UPM prior to PEG infusions in 2016 and 2019, respectively. In a side-by-side retrospective analysis, incidence and severity of HSRs were analyzed pre- and postimplementation of UPM in youth ≥1 years old treated with frontline PEG-containing ALL regimens (2015-2018, 2016-2020). All HSRs were centrally reviewed within each institution to confirm and grade the HSR (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5). Planned analyses of subsets at potentially greater risk for HSRs included intensive PEG regimens (≥5 doses), adolescent and young adults (AYA), Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity, and obesity. In 410 patients (by institution, n=282 and n=128), the overall incidence of Grade≥3 HSRs was 20% (56 out of 282) and 18% (23 out of 128), respectively. No difference in incidence of Grade≥3 HSRs in patients with versus without UPM was found at either institution (23vs. 19%, p=.487 and 19vs. 17%, p=.845). UPM also did not reduce the severity of HSRs, nor influence HSR risk within any patient subset. UPM prior to PEG infusion did not alter incidence or severity of HSRs at either institution. HSR remains a common complication of PEG therapy, impacting the patient experience. Alternative strategies to reduce HSRs are urgently required.

Polyethylene Glycol and Polysorbate 80 Skin Tests in the Context of an Allergic Risk Assessment for Hypersensitivity Reactions to Anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines.

Concern has arisen about hypersensitivity reactions in patients with allergic reactions to drugs containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 (PS80), excipients of currently available anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. However, the actual utility of PEG and PS80 skin allergy testing is currently still debated. We retrospectively analyzed all cases of patients on whom we performed allergometric skin tests for PEG and PS80 in the context of a pre-vaccination screening (for patients with multiple hypersensitivity reactions to drugs for which these excipients were among the suspected agents) or following suspected hypersensitivity reactions to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. A total of 134 tests were performed for PEG and PS80, eight of which produced uninterpretable results (due to dermographism or non-specific reactions). Of the remaining 126 cases (85 pre-vaccinal and 41 post-vaccine reactions), 16 (12.7%) were positive for PEG and/or PS80. Stratifying by clinical indication, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of positive tests between patients evaluated in the context of the pre-vaccination screening and those evaluated after a vaccine reaction (10.6% vs. 17.1%, respectively, p = 0.306). Allergometric skin tests for PEG and PS80 in our case series resulted positive in an unexpectedly high proportion of patients, suggesting that testing for allergy to these two excipients should not be ignored in case of reasonable clinical suspicion.

Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: Potential Value of the Lymphocyte Toxicity Assay to Assess Risk.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease characterized by multi-system dysfunction resulting in recurrent lung infections and progressive pulmonary disease. CF patients are at a higher risk for drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) compared to the general population, which has been attributed to the recurrent need for antibiotics and the inflammation associated with CF disease. In vitro toxicity tests such as the lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA) offer the potential for risk assessment for DHRs. In the current study, we investigated the utility of the LTA test for diagnosis of DHRs in a cohort of CF patients. Twenty CF patients with suspected DHRs to sulfamethoxazole, penicillins, cephalosporins, meropenem, vancomycin, rifampicin, and tobramycin were recruited to this study and tested using the LTA test along with 20 healthy control volunteers. Demographic data of the patients, including age, sex, and medical history, were obtained. Blood samples were withdrawn from patients and healthy volunteers, and the LTA test was performed on isolated peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) from those individuals. Cells from CF patients with DHRs displayed a significant (p < 0.0001) concentration-dependent enhanced cell death upon incubation with the culprit drug compared to cells from healthy volunteers. The positivity rate of the LTA test was over 80% in patients with a medical history and clinical presentation consistent with DHRs. This study is the first to evaluate the use of the LTA test for diagnosis of DHRs in CF patients. According to our results, the LTA test may be a useful tool for diagnosis and management of DHRs in CF patients. Identifying the culprit drug is essential for optimal healthcare for CF patients in the setting of a suspected DHR. The data also provide evidence that accumulation of toxic reactive metabolites could be an important component in the cascade of events leading to the development of DHRs in CF patients. A larger-scale study is needed to confirm the data.

Dermal Hypersensitivity Reaction to Semaglutide: Two Case Reports.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a class of antidiabetic agents that work by inducing insulin secretion and inhibiting release of glucagon in a glucose-dependent manner. They are especially promising given their long duration of action, decreased risk of hypoglycemia, and added benefit of weight loss. Semaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that has been approved for type II diabetes and chronic weight management in obese adults. Cases of hypersensitivity reactions have been previously reported in patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists dulaglutide and liraglutide. However, to our knowledge, there have been no reports of hypersensitivity reactions to semaglutide. Here, we present two cases of dermal hypersensitivity reactions in patients taking semaglutide for type II diabetes. In the first case, a 75-year-old woman who had been taking semaglutide for 10 months presented with an eruption on her legs, back, and chest for 3 months duration. Histology showed a subepidermal blister with eosinophils, suggestive of a drug hypersensitivity reaction. In the second case, a 74-year-old white man who had been taking semaglutide for 1 month presented with an eruption on the bilateral flanks and lower abdomen for 3 weeks duration. Histology revealed perivascular inflammatory cell infiltrate with eosinophils, also suggestive of a drug hypersensitivity reaction. Both patients began experiencing resolution of their symptoms within 1 month of discontinuing semaglutide. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.6550 Citation: Ouellette S, Frias G, Shah R, et al. Dermal hypersensitivity reaction to semaglutide: Two case reports. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):413-415. doi:10.36849/JDD.6550.

75P Clinical characteristics and desensitization protocol of chemotherapy-induced hypersensitivity reactions in patients with gynaecologic cancer

75P Clinical characteristics and desensitization protocol of chemotherapy-induced hypersensitivity reactions in patients with gynaecologic cancer

Next-generation sequencing-based HLA typing reveals the association of HLA-B*46:01:01 and HLA-DRB1*09:01:02 alleles with carbamazepine-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Vietnamese patients with epilepsy

Several studies have reported an association between certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced hypersensitivity reactions in patients with epilepsy. Here, the relationship between the clinical spectrum and the HLA allele profiles in patients with CBZ-induced hypersensitivity reactions was investigated using next-generation sequence (NGS) data obtained from 65 Vietnamese patients with epilepsy, including 33 with CBZ-tolerance and 32 patients with CBZ-hypersensitivity, in which only 8 with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions and 24 were mild-hypersensitive patients. Three loci of HLA class I (HLA-A, -B, and -C) and two loci of HLA class II (HLA-DQA1 and -DRB1) were included in our analysis. We observed a higher prevalence of three alleles, HLA-B*46:01:01, HLA-DQA1*03:02:01, and HLA-DRB1*09:01:02, in the CBZ hypersensitivity group compared to that in the CBZ tolerant group. Notably, all hypersensitive patients with HLA-DQA1*03:02:01 also harbored HLA-DRB1*09:01:02. We also used molecular modeling to gain mechanistic insight into the interactions of HLA-B*46:01 and HLA-DRB1*09:01 with CBZ. Our findings proposed the direct interaction of CBZ with peptide-binding pockets of these HLA proteins. The sensitivity and specificity of HLA-B*46:01:01 in considering with the appearance of HLA-DRB1*09:01:02 were 46.88% and 84.85%, respectively. Our data suggest that the presence of HLA-B*46:01:01/HLA-DRB1*09:01:02 is a potential marker of CBZ-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Vietnamese patients.

Folliculocentric lymphocytic hypersensitivity reactions in CLL/SLL patients: A unique clinicopathologic entity amongst non-specific hypersensitivity reactions.

Cutaneous hypersensitivity eruptions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are a clinically and histologically heterogeneous group that can either precede, occur with, or follow the development of a hematologic malignancy. Therefore, establishing the diagnosis requires careful clinical and pathologic correlation and an understanding of the broad spectrum of presentations. Data is lacking on the correlation of skin disease with molecular/cytogenetic risk profiling of the tumor. The aims of this study were to characterize the clinical, histological, and genetic aberrations in recurrent cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in patients with CLL/SLL. A single site academic retrospective chart review of medical records, histopathology, molecular and cytogenetic data in CLL/SLL patients who developed biopsy-proven cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. Five hundred one new diagnoses of CLL/SLL with 73 patients requiring cutaneous biopsies for skin lesions or rashes were identified. With exclusion criteria, 20 biopsies were identified from 17 patients (mean age, 69.6years, females=9) with unexplained cutaneous eruptions. These were commonly pruritic, erythematous papules above the waist. Most biopsies had a prominent superficial, deep dermal eosinophilic infiltrate (85%), with a robust T-cell predominant dermal infiltrate in 40%. Five out of 17 patients (29%) had a predominately folliculocentric CD4+ T-cell infiltrate; all occurring on the head and neck. Overall, the prevalence of cutaneous hypersensitivity eruptions requiring biopsy was 3.4% (n=17), and the prevalence of folliculocentric CD4+ T-cell infiltrate was 1% (n=5). Cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in CLL/SLL are heterogeneous; however, folliculotropic CD4+ T-cell infiltrates may be seen in a small but distinct clinical subset of patients. Commonly tested cytogenetic aberrations in CLL/SLL do not appear to be correlated with the presence of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions.

Human leukocyte antigen association with azathioprine-induced drug hypersensitivity reactions in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis

Azathioprine (AZA) drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) is an uncommon yet potentially lethal condition that often goes unrecognised in patients with anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV). We conducted a retrospective review of AAV patients on AZA maintenance therapy (N = 35). Participants were categorised into those who had experienced AZA-DHR (N = 15) and those who were AZA-tolerant (N = 20). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing was performed in both groups. The primary endpoint was identification of a HLA gene association with AZA-DHR in the context of AAV. HLA-C*06:02, was solely expressed in AZA-DHR patients (33.3 %), whilst no patient who tolerated AZA carried this allele (0.0 %). This yielded a positive predictive value of 100 % for HLA-C*06:02 in predicting AZA-DHR in AAV patients, negative predictive value of 66.7 %, sensitivity of 33.3 % and specificity of 100 %. HLA-C*06:02 may predict the development of AZA-DHR in patients with AAV and inform safer therapeutic choice.

Taxanes induced hypersensitivity reactions in cancer chemotherapy patients reported at adverse drug reaction monitoring centre at a tertiary care hospital

Background: Cancer chemotherapy involves highly complex regimens using antineoplastic agents like taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) etc. Taxanes cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) like redness, rashes, dyspnoea, severe anaphylaxis and death. In this study, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with taxanes are described &amp; analysed on their severity and preventability. The present study aims to analyse and determine the prevalence of ADRs, especially HSRs in patients treated with taxanes.Methods: After getting IEC approval, the present study is done retrospectively by assessing the HSRs in suspected ADR reporting forms from December 2019 to February 2022 in ADR monitoring centre (AMC) in the Department of Pharmacology at Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool. Descriptive statistics used to analyse patient demography, frequency, various carcinomas under treatment &amp; organ involved, causality assessment using WHO-UMC Scale and Naranjo's Algorithm, severity assessment using modified Hartwig &amp; Siegel’s scale and preventability by modified Schumock &amp; Thornton scale.Results: A total of 258 ADRs were recorded, of which 30 cases reported HSRs with taxanes-paclitaxel (22) and docetaxel (8). The most commonly occurred HSR is shortness of breath. Naranjo’s algorithm showed 52.5% possible (score 1-4) HSRs. WHO-UMC causality assessment scale showed 56.4% as probable HSRs. Modified Hartwig &amp; Siegel severity scale showed 46.6% moderate (level 3). Modified Schumock and Thornton scale showed 76.9% as not preventable.Conclusions: Chemotherapy-related ADRs among cancer patients urges the oncologists to be actively involved in ADR reporting, in the need of the hour in order to mitigate, avoid their occurrence and reducing morbidity and mortality, when practiced with diligence.

891. Challenging the Dogma of Beta-Lactam Allergies: Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Penicillin allergies are reported in approximately 10% of patients in the US but ∼90% of these allergies can be de-labeled. Consequences of inappropriate allergy labeling leads to use of alternative agents associated with increased adverse events and resistance rates, leading to worse outcomes. Though all beta-lactam agents share the core beta-lactam ring, the R1 side chain has been identified as the focus of cross-reactivity. Agents that do not share the same or similar R1 side chain are likely to have negligible risk of hypersensitivity reactions. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy that received a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain based on recommendation by an antimicrobial stewardship clinical pharmacist. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of patients admitted to NYU Langone Hospital – Long Island from October 2019 to February 2022. Data was collected by review of the electronic medical record and descriptive statistics were generated as appropriate. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients that experienced a hypersensitivity reaction to a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain. Secondary outcomes included impact of antimicrobial stewardship intervention by clinical pharmacists, avoidance of alternative antibiotics, and cost comparison between agents requested and recommended. Results A total of 181 patients were included in the final analysis, including 37 patients with a history of anaphylaxis. No patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy experienced a hypersensitivity reaction upon receiving a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain. Within the cost comparison, meropenem accounted for 45.6% and 75.9% of the total minimum and maximum wholesale costs of requested agents, respectively. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that receipt of a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain is safe in patients with a history of beta-lactam allergy, including anaphylaxis history, and supports 'in the moment' antimicrobial stewardship intervention to ensure patients receive optimal therapy when access to in-depth allergy history or detailed patient interview is not feasible. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Short bevacizumab infusion as an effective and safe treatment for colorectal cancer.

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that contains <10% murine protein. To prevent infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), the initial bevacizumab infusion is delivered for 90 min, the second for 60 min and subsequent doses for 30 min. Several previous studies have shown that short bevacizumab infusions are safe and do not result in severe HSRs in patients with colorectal, lung, ovarian and brain cancer. However, the efficacy of short bevacizumab infusions for colorectal cancer management remains unclear. Therefore, to investigate this issue, a prospective multicenter study was conducted using 23 patients enrolled between June 2017 and March 2019. The initial infusion of bevacizumab was for 30 min followed by a second infusion rate of 0.5 mg/kg/min (5 mg/kg over 10 min and 7.5 mg/kg over 15 min. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The overall response and disease control rates were 57 and 87%, respectively. The median PFS time was 306 days (interquartile range, 204-743 days). No HSRs were noted. Adverse events associated with bevacizumab included grade 4 small intestinal perforation and grade 3 stroke in 1 patient each. These results suggest that a short bevacizumab infusion regime comprising an initial infusion for 30 min followed by a second infusion at 0.5 mg/kg/min is safe and efficacious for the management of colorectal cancer.

Iodinated Contrast Media Substitution to Prevent Recurrent Hypersensitivity Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Changing iodinated contrast media (ICM) may reduce the risk of recurrent ICM-induced hypersensitivity reactions in patients with a prior reaction. Purpose To perform a systematic review on the effectiveness of ICM change in comparison with no change to prevent recurrent ICM immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Materials and methods Multiple data bases were searched without language restriction between January 1990 and August 2021 to identify comparative studies of any design that included patients with a prior ICM hypersensitivity reaction to low-osmolality ICM and re-exposure to intravascular ICM. The methods used included a duplicate assessment of eligibility, double extraction of quantitative data, validity assessment, and random-effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of all-grade immediate recurrent hypersensitivity reactions. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of severe immediate recurrent hypersensitivity reactions and other adverse events associated with ICM change. Results Six retrospective observational studies at moderate to severe risk of bias assessed 7155 adult patients (4329 in the ICM change group and 2826 in the no-change group). Studies adopted nonstandardized switching methods, and the proportions of the ICM change group ranged between 19% (five of 27 examinations) and 80% (3104 of 3880 examinations). A Bayesian meta-analysis revealed that changing ICM was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent hypersensitivity reaction by 61% (risk ratio = 0.39; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.24, 0.58). The wide-ranging estimates of risk reduction were not explained by the risk of bias ratings, the event rates in the no-change group, the index-reaction severity, or the co-administered nonstandard premedication. Rare severe recurrent reactions (five studies with five events) precluded a conclusion (risk ratio = 0.34, favoring ICM change; CrI: 0.01, 3.74). Adverse events associated with ICM change were not reported. Conclusion In observational evidence of limited quality, iodinated contrast media (ICM)-change was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent immediate hypersensitivity reaction in patients with a prior ICM-induced hypersensitivity reaction. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by McDonald in this issue.

Pharmacological Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions Caused by Iodinated Contrast Media: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are uncommon but serious adverse events following the administration of iodinated contrast media (ICM) prior to CT imaging. While premedication is almost universally given in high-risk patients, there is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of such premedication. This study aims to determine the efficacy of premedication with corticosteroids prior to ICM administration in the prevention of HSRs through meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: An extensive review of the literature yielded 404 potentially relevant studies. Of these, five studies met the inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis. Pooled HSR event rates were obtained from each of the studies for both patients who had and who had not received premedication with corticosteroids. Heterogeneity between studies was also determined. Results: A total of 736 patients across all five studies were included in the analysis. Patients who did not receive premedication had initial pooled HSR rates of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07–0.35) across all studies. Following premedication, pooled HSR rates dropped to 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.06). Patients who had prior HSRs were significantly less likely to experience HSRs (OR = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03–0.25; p < 0.00001) after treatment with premedication. Conclusions: This meta-analysis offers evidence for the reduction in the recurrence of moderate and severe HSRs in patients who have a history of such reactions. Premedication with corticosteroids prior to ICM administration is thus highly recommended in high-risk patients.

Role of T-Cells in Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients of Allergic Diseases

Role of T-Cells in Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients of Allergic Diseases