Abstract Introduction/Objective Introduction: Hand hygiene (HH) compliance is pivotal in preventing infections in healthcare settings, necessitating robust monitoring systems. This abstract outlines the assessment of three electronic HH monitoring systems across four United Arab Emirates (UAE) hospitals. Methods/Case Report Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in four UAE governmental hospitals, evaluating three HH monitoring systems. Sensors were strategically positioned on alcohol-based dispensers, healthcare workers’ ID badges, and patients’ beds in these systems. Additionally, a comparative analysis was performed between direct observation data and automated system data. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Results: System 1 was evaluated at Hospitals A and B, revealing HH compliance rates of 65% and 46%, respectively, contrasting with direct observation rates of 88% and 80%. Hospital C assessed System 2, reporting a compliance rate of 70%, compared to direct observation’s 94%. System 3, evaluated at Hospital D, showed a compliance rate of 39%, in contrast to the 88% observed directly. Conclusion Conclusion: While electronic monitoring systems offer continuous surveillance and data analysis benefits, they also present limitations. These include challenges in accurately distinguishing HH indications and opportunities, identifying all required HH moments, and capturing technique nuances. Understanding these strengths and limitations is vital for healthcare institutions aiming to implement effective HH monitoring strategies to enhance patient safety and reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAI