Hydrosmotic Effect Of Vasopressin Research Articles

Involvement of Interstitial Structures of the Kidney into Hydrosmotic Effect of Vasopressin (Morphofunctional Study)

Administration of desmopressin for 4 days to homozygous Brattleboro rats lacking endogenous vasopressin induced an increase in osmotic concentration and was accompanied by typical changes in the morphofunctional state of interstitial cells of the renal papilla. These changes increase the permeability of extracellular matrix, which attested to the involvement of interstitial cells into hydrosmotic reaction to vasopressin.

Mercury blockage of apical water channels in toad skin (Bufo marinus).

1. Net water flow (Jw) was continuously monitored across the abdominal skin of the toad Bufo marinus by means of a volumetric, automatic technique. Jw was either averaged over periods of 2 min or taken cumulatively (10 or 30 min periods). 2. The state of high water permeability induced by vasopressin or isoprenaline was reversed (88-89% inhibition of delta Jw after 1 h) by the addition of 10(-3) M HgCl2 (or CH3ClHg) to the external bathing medium. Similarly, pre-exposure of the skins to Hg2+, totally blocked the induction of the hydrosmotic response to the same agents. By itself, Hg2+ exerted only a minor (26%) stimulation of basal Jw. 3. There was a sigmoidal dose-response relationship between the reduction of the hydrosmotic effect of vasopressin (VP) and the concentration of Hg2+ in the external medium, with a half-maximal effect at 1.2 x 10(-4) M HgCl2. 4. Total replacement of Na+ by K+, Rb+ or Cs+ in the Ringer solution, caused a VP-like, hydrosmotic effect that was reversed, or prevented, by exposure to Hg2+ in a manner indistinguishable from that previously seen with vasopressin or isoprenaline. 5. The data point to the presence of a Hg(2+)-sensitive apical water pathway in stimulated epithelia, very probably constituted by water channels similar to those reported in red blood cells, amphibian bladder and mammalian kidney tubules.

Effect of V1/V2-receptor antagonism on renal function and response to vasopressin in conscious dogs

To characterize effects of V1- and V2-receptor stimulation on renal function, eight conscious mongrel female dogs were studied in four separate studies greater than or equal to 2 wk apart during the following six consecutive 20-min periods: 1) intrarenal administration of the full V1/V2-receptor antagonist SKF 105494 (100 ng.kg-1.min-1) during basal circulating vasopressin (VP) levels (n = 3), 2) elevation of renal arterial plasma VP concentrations by intrarenal administration of exogenous arginine VP (0.05 mU.kg-1.min-1, n = 5), 3) simultaneous administration of SKF 105494 at (100 ng.kg-1.min-1) with intrarenal administration of exogenous VP (0.05 mU.kg-1.min-1; n = 5), and 4) intrarenal vehicle alone (n = 5). When administered during conditions of basal circulating endogenous VP, the full receptor antagonist effects were limited to opposition of hydrosmotic effects of VP. Elevation of renal arterial plasma VP levels through infusion of exogenous VP resulted in decreased renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, osmolar clearance, urinary flow rate, and free water clearance and increased urine osmolality. These effects were all abolished by simultaneous administration of V1/V2-receptor antagonist. These data suggest that, under basal low levels of circulating VP, VP only influences renal water excretion. However, when plasma VP concentrations are elevated, VP may contribute to renal vasoconstriction and secondarily to reduced solute excretion, in addition to its effects on free water clearance.

Effects of histidine on vasopressin action: role of decreased prostaglandin production.

Addition of histidine to the serosal bath of the toad bladder increases the hydrosmotic response of vasopressin in this tissue. Because this represents primarily the effect of the imidazole ring of histidine, which is a known inhibitor of the production of prostaglandins, we evaluated whether histidine increases the response to vasopressin through decreased prostaglandin production. Histidine increases the response to vasopressin much more than 10(-5) M naproxen, even though the latter was equipotent to histidine in reducing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. Furthermore, histidine was additive to naproxen in increasing the hydrosmotic effect of vasopressin, without causing a further decrease in PGE2 production. These findings suggest that histidine has an effect over and above that due to inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Our results suggest that histidine enhances the permeability of the tissue beneath the luminal membrane, an effect not found with naproxen. We propose that histidine increases the hydrosmotic response to vasopressin through at least two distinct mechanisms: 1) it decreases prostaglandin synthesis and thus increases luminal permeability; 2) it decreases the resistance to water movement of the tissues beneath the luminal membrane.

Forskolin mimics the hydrosmotic action of vasopressin in the urinary bladder of toads Bufo marinus.

Net water flow JW was measured across the urinary bladder of toads Bufo marinus and averaged over periods of 1 min by means of a volumetric, automatic technique. The diterpene forskolin, an activator of adenylate cyclase bypassing the hormonal receptor subunit, induced a rapid, reversible, dose-dependent increase in osmotic water permeability, Pf, very similar to that induced by vasopressin. At 1.1 microM, forskolin induced a half-maximal response. At 5 microM forskolin caused a near maximal response and Pf increased from 1.66 +/- 0.15 to 66.6 +/- 2.99 microns s-1. In bladders pre-exposed to 5 microM-forskolin, further significant increases in Pf were obtained by their subsequent exposure to vasopressin, cyclic AMP, theophylline or serosal hypertonicity. The similarity of the forskolin and vasopressin actions was further demonstrated by the finding that substances causing enhancement (quercetin) or inhibition (trifluoperazine, vanadate, silver, cobalt, manganese and Ca2+-free Ringer solution) of the vasopressin response, induced parallel changes in the forskolin response. Three agents, however, induced dissimilar effects on vasopressin and forskolin: high K+ potentiated vasopressin but inhibited forskolin; methohexital and diamide inhibited vasopressin but had no effect on forskolin. The forskolin-induced hydrosmotic response can be viewed as a new criterion for ascertaining the messenger role of cycle AMP in the the hydrosmotic effect of vasopressin.

The hydrosmotic effect of vasopressin: A scanning electron-microscope study

Scanning electron-microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate the hydrosmotic effect of vasopressin on the apical surface of urinary bladders of toads Bufo marinus. Bladders were mounted on glass chambers and water fluxes were monitored with an optical method. Tissues were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and processed for SEM. Three types of cells were seen on the surface of control bladders:large polygonal (granular) cells, with blunt microvilli; smaller (mitochondria-rich) cells, with longer microvilli; goblet cells. Neither exposure of the bladders to a large osmotic gradient nor exposure to vasopressin in the absence of a gradient altered appreciably the epithelial surface. In contrast, the combination of vasopressin and an osmotic gradient resulted ina conspicuous diminution of the blunt microvilli. However, the small cells with longer microvilli remained unchanged. Identical results were seen with cAMP or theophylline in the presence of an osmotic gradient. These findings suggest that the hydrosmotic effect of vasopressin is mainly exerted on the granular cells of toad bladder and confirm observations made by others with the electron-microscope.