Abstract Hydrodynamical cosmological simulations of galaxy formation such as
IllustrisTNG or Auriga have shown considerable success in approximately matching
many galaxy properties, but their treatment of the star-forming interstellar medium (ISM)
has relied on heuristic sub-grid models. However, recent high-resolution simulations of
the ISM that directly resolve the regulation of star formation suggest different mean rela-
tions for the dependences of pressure and star formation rate on the average gas density.
In this study, we adopt such a modern, physically grounded parameterisation inspired by
the TIGRESS small-scale simulations. We dub this model TEQS and use it for a detailed
comparative analysis of the formation and evolution of Milky Way-sized galaxy when
compared with the widely used TNG model. By employing high-resolution simulations
in tall box setups, we first investigate the structural differences expected for these two
models when applied to different self-gravitating gas surface densities. Our results indi-
cate that TEQS produces considerably thinner gaseous layers and can be expected to form
stellar distributions with smaller scale height than TNG, especially at higher surface den-
sity. To test whether this induces systematic structural differences in cosmological galaxy
formation simulations, we carry out zoom-in simulations of 12 galaxies taken from the
set of Milky Way-sized galaxies that have been studied in the Auriga project. Comparing
results for these galaxies shows that disk galaxies formed with the TEQS model have on
average very similar stellar mass but are more concentrated in their central regions and ex-
hibit smaller stellar radii compared to those formed with the TNG model. The differences
in the scale heights of the formed stellar disks are only marginal, however, suggesting that
other factors for setting the thickness of the disk are more important than the applied ISM
equation-of-state model. Overall, the predicted galaxy structure is quite similar for TNG
and TEQS despite significant differences in the employed star formation law, demonstrat-
ing that feedback processes are more important in regulating the stellar mass than the
precise star formation law itself.
Read full abstract