Hybrid Logic Research Articles

Electro-optical hybrid logic gate

An Electro-Optical Hybrid Logic Gate is defined as a circuit that accepts either electrical or optical signals and produces both electrical and optical signals. This paper explores the feasibility of developing hybrid gates for logic functions namely OR and AND, which can perform the intended logic function either with electrical or optical input signals and produce the output both in the form of electrical and optical signals. These hybrid logic gates are proposed and implemented using phototransistors and LEDs. The logic circuits are found to be operating satisfactorily for the defined logic levels.

Hybrid Logics and Ontology Languages

Description Logics (DLs) are a family of logic based knowledge representation formalisms. Although they have a range of applications, they are perhaps best known as the basis for widely used ontology languages such as OIL, DAML+OIL and OWL, the last of which is now a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) recommendation. SHOIN, the DL underlying OWL DL (the most widely used “species” of OWL), includes familiar features from hybrid logic. In particular, in order to support extensionally defined classes, SHOIN includes nominals: classes whose extension is a singleton set. This is an important feature for a logic that is designed for use in ontology language applications, because extensionally defined classes are very common in ontologies. Binders and state variables are another feature from Hybrid Logic that would clearly be useful in an ontology language, but it is well known that adding this feature to even a relatively weak language would lead to undecidability. However, recent work has shown that this feature could play a very useful role in query answering, where the syntactic structure of queries means that the occurrence of state variables is restricted in a way that allows for decidable reasoning.

Topological Perspective on the Hybrid Proof Rules

We consider the non-orthodox proof rules of hybrid logic from the viewpoint of topological semantics. Topological semantics is more general than Kripke semantics. We show that the hybrid proof rule BG is topologically not sound. Indeed, among all topological spaces the BG rule characterizes those that can be represented as a Kripke frame (i.e., the Alexandroff spaces). We also demonstrate that, when the BG rule is dropped and only the Name rule is kept, one can prove a general topological completeness result for hybrid logics axiomatized by pure formulas. Finally, we indicate some limitations of the topological expressive power of pure formulas. All results generalize to neighborhood frames.

Undecidability of Multi-modal Hybrid Logics

This paper establishes undecidability of satisfiability for multi-modal logic equipped with the hybrid binder ↓, with respect to frame classes over which the same language with only one modality is decidable. This is in contrast to the usual behaviour of many modal and hybrid logics, whose uni-modal and multi-modal versions do not differ in terms of decidability and, quite often, complexity. The results from this paper apply to a wide range of frame classes including temporally and epistemically relevant ones.

Towards a Hybrid Dynamic Logic for Hybrid Dynamic Systems

We introduce a hybrid variant of a dynamic logic with continuous state transitions along differential equations, and we present a sequent calculus for this extended hybrid dynamic logic. With the addition of satisfaction operators, this hybrid logic provides improved system introspection by referring to properties of states during system evolution. In addition to this, our calculus introduces state-based reasoning as a paradigm for delaying expansion of transitions using nominals as symbolic state labels. With these extensions, our hybrid dynamic logic advances the capabilities for compositional reasoning about (semialgebraic) hybrid dynamic systems. Moreover, the constructive reasoning support for goal-oriented analytic verification of hybrid dynamic systems carries over from the base calculus to our extended calculus.

Higher-Order Syntax and Saturation Algorithms for Hybrid Logic

We present modal logic on the basis of the simply typed lambda calculus with a system of equational deduction. Combining first-order quantification and higher-order syntax, we can maintain modal reasoning in terms of classical logic by remarkably simple means. Such an approach has been broadly uninvestigated, even though it has notable advantages, especially in the case of Hybrid Logic.We develop a tableau-like semi-decision procedure and subsequently a decision procedure for an alternative characterization of HL(@), a well-studied fragment of Hybrid Logic.With regards to deduction, our calculus simplifies in particular the treatment of identities. Moreover, labeling and access information are both internal and explicit, while in contrast traditional modal tableau calculi either rely on external labeling mechanisms or have to maintain an implicit accessibility relation by equivalent formulas.With regards to computational complexity, our saturation algorithm is optimal. In particular, this proves the satisfiability problem for HL(@) to be in PSPACE, a result that was previously not achieved by the saturation approach.

Hybridizing a Logical Framework

Logical connectives familiar from the study of hybrid logic can be added to the logical framework LF, a constructive type theory of dependent functions. This extension turns out to be an attractively simple one, and maintains all the usual theoretical and algorithmic properties, for example decidability of type-checking. Moreover it results in a rich metalanguage for encoding and reasoning about a range of resource-sensitive substructural logics, analagous to the use of LF as a metalanguage for more ordinary logics.This family of applications of the language, contrary perhaps to expectations of how hybridized systems are typically used, does not require the usual modal connectives box and diamond, nor any internalization of a Kripke accessibility relation. It does, however, make essential use of distinctively hybrid connectives: universal quantifiation over worlds, truth of a proposition at a named world, and local binding of the current world. This supports the claim that the innovations of hybrid logic have independent value even apart from their traditional relationship to temporal and alethic modal logics.

COMMON-SENSE SPATIAL REASONING FOR INFORMATION CORRELATION IN PERVASIVE COMPUTING

The current technological trend depicts a scenario in which space, and more generally the environment in which the computation takes place, represents a key aspect that must be considered in order to improve systems' context awareness, even if the kind of information processed is not only of spatial nature. This article focuses on the notions of “place” and “conceptual spatial relation” to present a formal model of space supporting common-sense spatial reasoning. The model can be viewed as the semantic specification for a hybrid logic, whose formulas represent spatially qualified information. Interesting classes of common-sense spatial models are identified according to the properties of their characteristic relations and an axiomatization of the associated hybrid language is given; a sound and complete tableau-based calculus for these classes of models is provided.

Termination for Hybrid Tableaus

This article extends and improves work on tableau-based decision methods for hybrid logic by Bolander and Braüner. Their paper gives tableau-based decision procedures for basic hybrid logic (with unary modalities) and the basic logic extended with the global modality. All their proof procedures make use of loop-checks to ensure termination. Here we take a closer look at termination for hybrid tableaus. We cover both types of system used in hybrid logic: prefixed tableaus and internalized tableaus. We first treat prefixed tableaus. We prove a termination result for the basic language (with n-ary operators) that does not involve loop-checks. We then successively add the global modality and n-ary inverse modalities, show why various different types of loop-check are required in these cases, and then re-prove termination. Following this we consider internalized tableaus. At first sight, such systems seem to be more complex. However, we define a internalized system which terminates without loop-checks. It is simpler than previously known internalized systems (all of which require loop-checks to terminate) and simpler than our prefix systems (no non-local side conditions on rules are required).

On the freeze quantifier in Constraint LTL: Decidability and complexity

Constraint LTL, a generalisation of LTL over Presburger constraints, is often used as a formal language to specify the behavior of operational models with constraints. The freeze quantifier can be part of the language, as in some real-time logics, but this variable-binding mechanism is quite general and ubiquitous in many logical languages (first-order temporal logics, hybrid logics, logics for sequence diagrams, navigation logics, logics with λ-abstraction, etc.). We show that Constraint LTL over the simple domain 〈N,=〉 augmented with the freeze quantifier is undecidable which is a surprising result in view of the poor language for constraints (only equality tests). Many versions of freeze-free Constraint LTL are decidable over domains with qualitative predicates and our undecidability result actually establishes Σ11-completeness. On the positive side, we provide complexity results when the domain is finite (ExpSpace-completeness) or when the formulae are flat in a sense introduced in the paper. Our undecidability results are sharp (i.e. with restrictions on the number of variables) and all our complexity characterisations ensure completeness with respect to some complexity class (mainly PSpace and ExpSpace).

Why does the proof-theory of hybrid logic work so well?

This is primarily a conceptual paper. The goal of the paper is to put into perspective the proof-theory of hybrid logic and in particular, try to give an answer to the following question: Why does the proof-theory of hybrid logic work so well compared to the proof-theory of ordinary modal logic? Roughly, there are two different kinds of proof systems for modal logic: Systems where the formulas involved in the rules are formulas of the object language, that is, ordinary modal-logical formulas, and systems where the formulas involved in the rules are metalingustic formulas obtained by attaching labels representing possible worlds to ordinary modal-logical formulas. Systems of the second kind often also involve an explicit representation of the accessibility relation. From a proof-theoretic point of view, modal-logical systems of the first kind are less well-behaved than systems of the second kind. It turns out that this can be remedied by hybridization, that is, hybridization of modal logics enables the formulation of well-behaved proof systems without involving metalinguistic machinery. What has happened is that the metalinguistic machinery has been internalized in the object language. This gives an answer to the initial question, which is that the proof-theory of hybrid logic works so well because the metalinguistic semantic machinery has been internalized in the object language.

Pure Extensions, Proof Rules, and Hybrid Axiomatics

In this paper we argue that hybrid logic is the deductive setting most natural for Kripke semantics. We do so by investigating hybrid axiomatics for a variety of systems, ranging from the basic hybrid language (a decidable system with the same complexity as orthodox propositional modal logic) to the strong Priorean language (which offers full first-order expressivity). We show that hybrid logic offers a genuinely first-order perspective on Kripke semantics: it is possible to define base logics which extend automatically to a wide variety of frame classes and to prove completeness using the Henkin method. In the weaker languages, this requires the use of non-orthodox rules. We discuss these rules in detail and prove non-eliminability and eliminability results. We also show how another type of rule, which reflects the structure of the strong Priorean language, can be employed to give an even wider coverage of frame classes. We show that this deductive apparatus gets progressively simpler as we work our way up the expressivity hierarchy, and conclude the paper by showing that the approach transfers to first-order hybrid logic.

A proof–theoretic study of the correspondence of hybrid logic and classical logic

In this paper, we show the equivalence between the provability of a proof system of basic hybrid logic and that of translated formulas of the classical predicate logic with equality and explicit substitution by a purely proof---theoretic method. Then we show the equivalence of two groups of proof systems of hybrid logic: the group of labelled deduction systems and the group of modal logic-based systems.

SiC Smart Power JFET Technology for High-Temperature Applications

Wide bandgap semiconductor materials such as SiC or GaN are very attractive for use in high-power, high-temperature, and/or radiation resistant electronics. Monolithic or hybrid integration of a power transistor and control circuitry in a single or multi-chip wide bandgap power semiconductor module is highly desirable for such applications in order to improve the efficiency and reliability. This paper describes a new monolithic SiC JFET IC technology for high-temperature smart power applications that allows for on-chip integration of control circuitry and normally-off power switch. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of this technology, hybrid logic gates with maximum switching frequency > 20 MHz and normally-off 900 V power switch have been fabricated on alumina substrates using discrete enhanced and depletion mode vertical trench JFETs.

Hybrid Formulas and Elementarily Generated Modal Logics

We characterize the modal logics of elementary classes of Kripke frames as precisely those modal logics that are axiomatized by modal axioms synthesized in a certain effective way from sentences of hybrid logic. These are pure positive hybrid sentences with arbitrary existential and relativized universal quantification over nominals. The proof has three steps. The first step is to use the known result that the modal logic of any elementary class of Kripke frames is also the modal logic of the closure of this class under disjoint unions, generated subframes, bounded morphic images, and ultraroots. This latter class can be defined by the first-order sentences of a special syntactic form (called pseudo-equations by Goldblatt) that are valid in the former class. The second step is to translate these pseudo-equations into equivalent quasi-positive hybrid sentences. In the third and main step, we show that any quasi-positive sentence S generates an infinite set of modal formulas called approximants, which together axiomatize a canonical modal logic that is sound and complete for the class of frames validating S. The proof is analogous to standard proofs of Sahlqvist's theorem. It generalizes to sets of quasi-positive sentences. The main result now follows.

Tableau-based Decision Procedures for Hybrid Logic

Hybrid logics are a principled generalization of both modal logics and description logics. It is well known that various hybrid logics without binders are decidable, but decision procedures are usually not based on tableau systems, a kind of formal proof procedure that lends itself to computer implementation. In this article, we give four different tableau-based decision procedures for a very expressive hybrid logic including the universal modality; three of the procedures are based on different tableau systems, and one procedure is based on a Gentzen system. The decision procedures make use of so-called loop-checks, which is a standard technique used in connection with tableau systems for other logics, namely, prefixed tableau systems for transitive modal logics as well as for certain description logics. The loop-checks used in our four decision procedures are similar, but the four proof systems on which the procedures are based constitute a spectrum of different systems: prefixed and internalized systems, tableau and Gentzen systems.

Axioms for classical, intuitionistic, and paraconsistent hybrid logic

In this paper we give axiom systems for classical and intuitionistic hybrid logic. Our axiom systems can be extended with additional rules corresponding to conditions on the accessibility relation ...

Arthur Prior and Hybrid Logic

Contemporary hybrid logic is based on the idea of using formulas as terms, an idea invented and explored by Arthur Prior in the mid 1960s. But Prior's own work on hybrid logic remains largely undiscussed. This is unfortunate, since hybridisation played a role that was both central to and problematic for his philosophical views on tense. In this paper I introduce hybrid logic from a contemporary perspective, and then examine the role it played in Prior's work.

Hybrid Logics with Infinitary Proof Systems

We provide a strongly complete infinitary proof system for hybrid logic. This proof system can be extended with countably many sequents. Thus, although these logics may be non-compact, strong completeness proofs are provided for infinitary hybrid versions of non-compact logics like ancestral logic and Segerberg's modal logic with the bounded chain condition. This extends the completeness result for hybrid logics by Gargov, Passy, and Tinchev.

Transfer Results for Hybrid Logic. Part I: The Case Without Satisfaction Operators

We define for every Kripke complete modal logic L its hybrid companion LH and investigate which properties transfer from L to LH. For a specific class of logics, we present a satisfiability-preserving translation from LH to L. We prove that for this class of logics, complexity, (uniform) interpolation, and finite axiomatization transfer from L to LH. We also provide examples showing that, in general, none of complexity, decidability, the finite model property or the Beth property transfer.