Perforated GFRP ribs (PFRs) and epoxy bonding are commonly used shear connections ensuring a full composite action in FRP-concrete hybrid beam/deck. This study demonstrates test results of 27 push-out specimens to compare the failure modes, shear load-slip (P-S) curves, and shear performance of PFRs and epoxy bonding. The variables included the sanding depth on GFRP profiles (0.5 mm/1.0 mm) and the rows of PFRs (1/2/3/5). The push-out tests highlighted that the PFR specimens with 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm sanding depth experienced interface debonding failure and shearing failure of PFR, respectively. The epoxy bonding specimens with 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm sanding depth suffered adhesive failure and cohesive failure, respectively. Increasing the sanding depth from 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm is an effective approach to prevent the debonding failure. The typical shear load-slip (P-S) curves for PFRs exhibit the micro-slipping stage (slip≤0.2 mm) and the slipping stage (slip>0.2 mm). The P-S curves of epoxy bonding showed only the elastic stage. The shear capacity of the double-row PFR connector was close to epoxy bonding. The shear capacity and stiffness of the PFRs increased 37.2∼47.3 % and 99.7∼119.7 % with the sanding depth improved from 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm, respectively. Increasing the sanding depth would improve the shear stiffness of epoxy bonding. The shear capacity and stiffness of PFRs decreased with the rows of PFRs increased. Calculation equations for the shear capacity of epoxy bonding and PFRs were evaluated by comparing the test results collected from the literature and calculated results. Based on the elastic foundation beam theory, a calculation equation for the shear stiffness of PFRs was proposed and a theoretical bi-linear model was suggested to predict the load-slip curves.
Read full abstract