Humeral Plate Research Articles

Titanium Versus Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Intramedullary Nailing for Humeral Bone Tumors.

Multiple techniques have been described to treat humeral diaphyseal bone tumors requiring curettage or excision. Recent studies have suggested that carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) intramedullary nails (IMNs) may be preferable to titanium IMNs for patients with musculoskeletal tumors due to CFR-PEEK's high tensile strength, radiolucency, a modulus of elasticity closer to native bone, and improved postoperative surveillance/radiation dosing. In this study, we describe the rate of fixation failure for both CFR-PEEK and titanium humeral IMNs when used for humeral diaphyseal bone tumors requiring curettage or excision. This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study including 81 patients (27 CFR-PEEK and 54 titanium) treated for a humeral diaphyseal bone tumor using an IMN +/- methylmethacrylate between January 2017 and December 2022. Primary outcome was revision surgery due to soft tissue complications, non-unions, structural complications such as periprosthetic fracture or IMN breakage, periprosthetic infection, tumor progression, and implant failure due to rejection or fatigue. No failures were observed in either patients treated with titanium nails or patients treated with CFR-PEEK not requiring curettage. Fixation failure due to implant failure was observed in two cases - at 214 days and 469 days after surgery - where CFR-PEEK IMN was used for stabilization after a wide segmental resection for oncologic control with a cement spacer reconstruction. In both cases, the resection was larger than 6 cm, the remaining distal humerus was less than 5 cm, and failures occurred at the interface of the residual bone and spacer. Both patients were revised using a titanium distal posterolateral humeral plate fixed with screws and cables without any subsequent complications. One additional CFR-PEEK IMN required revision surgery after 744 days due to progression of the tumor and subsequent non-union. One revision surgery was observed after 63 days for the titanium IMN due to non-union and tumor progression. Humeral diaphyseal bone tumors requiring large segmental resection with small residual bone and a large cement spacer may fail via tension due to bending forces at the distal portion. In this clinical scenario, the use of larger diameter CFR-PEEK IMNs may be indicated when these are available. In the interim, use of intercalary allografts instead of cement spacers, additional fixation with a titanium plate distally, or the use of a titanium nail when using a cement spacer may be considered.

The Clinical Status of Proximal Humeral Fractures and Treatment Management of Patients

Background: Complications with surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, particularly in comminuted or osteoporotic fractures, include malunion, non-union, osteonecrosis of the humeral head, screw loosening, and loss of reduction. There has been a push to recommend the use of a locking compression plate (LPHP) for open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures because to the decreased complication rate found with its usage. Objective: In this study our main goal is to evaluate the clinical status of proximal humeral fractures and treatment management of patients. Method: This prospective observational study was carried out at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tetiary Medical College Hospital and District General Hospital, Dinajpur from January 2021 to January 2022. Total 55 patients were enrolled in the study. Five patients were lost to follow-up. So, finally50 patients were available for evaluation. Results: The participants' average age is 51.1, making those 51–60 years old 40% of the total. Also, 60% of the people involved were female. Seventy percent of patients had a locking proximal humeral plate inserted within three weeks of injury, whereas 30 percent had their plates inserted later than three weeks following injury. Yet although high velocity trauma accounted for 15% of injuries, low velocity traumas like falls accounted for 70%. Front shoulder scores between 910 and 1500 on the continuous scale were found in 12 patients (24%), 15 patients (30%), and 23 patients (46%). Subacromial impingement affected two patients (4%), delayed union affected three patients (6%), and a superficial infection affected nine patients (18%). The head screws on 3% of patients became loose, and the skulls of 1% of patients were perforated by the screws. Avascular necrosis did not manifest in any reported cases. Moreover, when the outcomes of the therapy were evaluated, 92% of patients reported satisfaction. Conclusion: Using a Locking Proximal .........

Radial Nerve Repair during Pregnancy with Internal Splinting for Radial Nerve Injury Following Humeral Plating.

Radial Nerve Repair during Pregnancy with Internal Splinting for Radial Nerve Injury Following Humeral Plating.

In Vitro Testing and Clinical Handling of a Novel Implant Positioning Technology for Proximal Humeral Plating.

Fractures of the proximal humerus are common, particularly in elderly populations. Anatomical locking plates target stabilization with a multitude of screws spanning into the humeral head. Sound implant placement and screw length determination are key for a successful clinical outcome but are difficult to obtain from planar X-rays. A novel implant positioning technology for proximal humerus plating (Xin1) outputs screw lengths suggestions and plate position based on hole projections in conventional X-ray images. This study investigated the performance of a prototype Xin1 system in a postmortem (in vitro) experiment as well as in a clinical handling test. For in vitro testing, twelve shoulders from six anatomical specimens were randomized into two groups to compare the Xin1 technique to the conventional operation in terms of surgical precision, procedure time and X-ray exposure. For the clinical trial, 11 patients undergoing plating of the proximal humerus were included. The aim was to investigate clinical handling of the Xin1 marker clip and to retrospectively evaluate the system performance in a real-life fracture situation. Image pairs before and after insertion of the proximal screws were retrospectively processed to investigate the influence of potential bone fragment shifts on the system output. In the postmortem experiment, the use of the system significantly improved the surgical precision (52% error reduction), procedure time (38% shorter) and radiation exposure (64% less X-rays). Clinical handling demonstrated seamless embedding of the marker clip into existing clinical workflows without adverse events reported. Retrospective X-ray analysis on six eligible patients revealed differences in the calculated screw lengths of ≤2 mm before and after screw insertion for five patients. In one patient, the screw lengths differed up to 8 mm, which might indicate displacement of the head fragment. Results suggest a strong potential of the Xin1 assistance technology to enhance the surgical procedure and patient outcomes in the rising incidence of osteoporotic humeral fractures. Robust performance in a real-life fracture situation was observed. In-depth validation of the system is, however, needed before placing it into clinical practice.

Comparison of Spiral Versus Lateral Plate Fixations in Treatment of Multiple Humeral Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis

Open reduction internal fixation technique has been generally accepted for treatment of complex humeral fractures. Traditional proximal humeral locking plate design (PHILOS) have been reported in clinical or biomechanical researches, while presently the spiral plate design has been introduced improved biomechanical behavior over conventional designs. In order to objectively realize the multi-directional biomechanical performances and minimally invasive surgery for humeral plate designs, a current conceptual finite element analysis has been conducted with identical cross-sectional features for humeral plates. The conceptual lateral, and spiral humeral plate models were constructed for virtual reduction and fixation to the multiple fractures of the humerus. Mechanical load cases including axial compression, counterclockwise torsion and anterior bending have been applied for confirming the multi-directional structural stability and implant safety in biomechanical perspective. Results revealed that the lateral humeral plate model showed lower equivalent (von-Mises) stress under counterclockwise torsion, while the spiral humeral plate model performed greater rigidity and lower equivalent (von-Mises) stress under other loading cases. Four models represented similar structural stiffness under bending load. Under the different mechanical load cases, the spiral humeral plate model revealed comparable results with acceptable multi-directional biomechanical behavior. The concept of spiral humeral plate design is worth considering in practical application in clinics. Implant safety and stability should be further investigated by evidences in future mechanical tests and clinical observations.

Extended deltopectoral approach for revision total elbow arthroplasty requiring humeral allograft-prosthetic composites in patients with severely compromised proximal humerus bone stock

Severe humeral bone loss in the setting of failed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) poses a particularly challenging reconstructive problem. The objective of this study was to review the rationale, indications, contraindications, and detailed surgical technique for using an extended anterior deltopectoral approach to perform a revision TEA when substantially long allografts are required in the presence of severely compromised proximal humerus bone stock. The authors developed this exposure and reconstructive strategy for failed elbow arthroplasties where the remaining segment of proximal humerus is extremely short, which makes adequate plate fixation of an allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) to the native bone extremely challenging. From an anterior deltopectoral approach, it is possible to use dedicated long, precontoured proximal humerus locking plates to maximize fixation in any remaining proximal humerus. This exposure still makes it possible to provide adequate access to the coupling mechanism of the humeral and ulnar components for implantation of a linked elbow arthroplasty. This exposure also allows for adequate judgment of humeral length and rotation. Crucial steps in the surgery include extending the dissection past the elbow flexion crease such that one can obtain circumferential exposure of the distal humerus. It is also important to couple the humeral and ulnar components prior to committing to the length of the APC. Special attention must be paid to gauge appropriate APC rotation and length for proper soft tissue tension. When performing fixation of the proximal humeral plate, screw purchase must be maximized in both the remaining native proximal humerus and the APC. Compression across the allograft-host interface is paramount for healing to occur. An extended anterior deltopectoral approach to perform a revision TEA when very long APCs are required is a viable option to restore humeral bone stock and regain humeral stem fixation in the setting of failed TEA with extensive humeral bone loss.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of exo-cortical placement of humeral calcar screw for reconstruction of medial column stability

To explore the biomechanical stability of the medial column reconstructed with the exo-cortical placement of humeral calcar screw by three-dimensional finite element analysis. A 70-year-old female volunteer was selected for CT scan of the proximal humerus, and a wedge osteotomy was performed 5 mm medially inferior to the humeral head to form a three-dimensional finite element model of a 5 mm defect in the medial cortex. Then, the proximal humeral locking plate (PHILOS) was placed. According to distribution of 2 calcar screws, the study were divided into 3 groups: group A, in which 2 calcar screws were inserted into the lower quadrant of the humeral head in the normal direction for supporting the humeral head; group B, in which 1 calcar screw was inserted outside the cortex below the humeral head, and the other was inserted into the humeral head in the normal direction; group C, in which 2 calcar screws were inserted outside the cortex below the humeral head. The models were loaded with axial, shear, and rotational loadings, and the biomechanical stability of the 3 groups was compared by evaluating the peak von mises stress (PVMS) of the proximal humerus and the internal fixator, proximal humeral displacement, neck-shaft angle changes, and the rotational stability of the proximal humerus. Seven cases of proximal humeral fractures with comminuted medial cortex were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2020. Locking proximal humeral plate surgery was performed, and one (5 cases) or two (2 cases) calcar screws were inserted into the inferior cortex of the humeral head during the operation, and the effectiveness was observed. Under axial and shear force, the PVMS of the proximal humerus in group B and group C was greater than that in group A, the PVMS of the internal fixator in group B and group C was less than that in group A, while the PVMS of the proximal humerus and internal fixator between group B and group C were similar. The displacement of the proximal humerus and the neck-shaft angle change among the 3 groups were similar under axial and shear force, respectively. Under the rotational torque, compared with group A, the rotation angle of humerus in group B and group C increased slightly, and the rotation stability decreased slightly. All the 7 patients were followed up 6-12 months. All the fractures healed, and the healing time was 8-14 weeks, with an average of 10.9 weeks; the neck-shaft angle changes (the difference between the last follow-up and the immediate postoperative neck-shaft angle) was (1.30±0.42)°, and the Constant score of shoulder joint function was 87.4±4.2; there was no complication such as humeral head varus collapse and screw penetrating the articular surface. For proximal humeral fractures with comminuted medial cortex, exo-cortical placement of 1 or 2 humeral calcar screw of the locking plate outside the inferior cortex of the humeral head can also effectively reconstruct medial column stability, providing an alternative approach for clinical practice.

Risk of Radial Nerve Injury in Anterolateral Humeral Shaft Plating.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury between arm positionings of 45° and 60° abduction in anterolateral humeral plating using a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate. Fifty-six humeri of cadavers in the supine position with 45° of arm abduction were exposed through the anterolateral approach. A hypothetical fracture line was marked at the middle of the humerus, and a precontoured ten-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate was applied and fixed to the anterolateral surface. After the fixation, the radial nerve was exposed through a triceps-splitting approach. Screws in contact with or which had penetrated the radial nerve were deemed to be injuries. Then, the screws and plate were removed, the arm changed to the 60° arm abduction position, and the steps of applying the plate and inserting the screws were followed as in the 45° arm abduction step. The screws which could potentially injure the radial nerve were those of the second to sixth screw holes in both the 45° and 60° of arm abduction positions. The incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve injury of the second to sixth screw holes in the 45° position were 5.36%, 39.29%, 80.36%, 60.71%, and 10.71%, respectively, and at the 60° position were 5.36%, 53.57%, 83.93%, 60.71%, and 7.14%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in risk of injury between the two positions in all screw holes (all P-values > 0.05). In anterolateral humeral shaft fixation, arm abduction position did not affect the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, with the main risk from certain screw holes. The surgeon should be careful in screw insertion, especially at the fourth and fifth screw holes. IV; cadaveric study.

How to treat proximal and middle one-third humeral shaft fractures: the role of helical plates.

To evaluate the outcomes of patients affected by proximal and middle one-third humeral shaft fractures treated with humeral helical plates. From October 2016 to June 2020, twenty-four (twenty women, four men) underwent humeral reduction and fixation with humeral helical plates (A.L.P.S.® Proximal Humeral Plating System, Zimmer Biomet) that preserve deltoid muscle insertion and reduce the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury. At one and six months after surgery, standard antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained, and at last follow-up (eighteen months on average), clinical evaluation was performed through range of motion assessment, Constant score and DASH score questionnaires. Only descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. At six months, all fractures have healed. At last follow-up (average eighteen months, 13-28) mean Constant score was 71 (range 33-96), mean Dash score was 19.2 (range 1.7-63). The average range of motion was calculated as follows: flexion 137.8° (range 90-180); abduction 125.8° (range 85-180°); external rotation 55° (range 20-80°), internal rotation at L3 (range between scapulae-trochanter). Three patients experienced temporary radial nerve palsy from injury, while in one case, a temporary iatrogenic palsy occurred. In our opinion, the helical plate may be an effective surgical tool for management of proximal and middle one-third diaphyseal humeral fractures. The humeral helical plate allows stable fixation avoiding the deltoid tuberosity proximally and radial nerve distally, thus increasing the possibility of rapid functional recovery after surgery.

Efficacy of Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fractures and Its Influence on Shoulder Joint Function Recovery.

In this paper, we have aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effect of intramedullary nailing (IMN) in treating comminuted proximal humeral fractures (CPHFs) and its influence on the recovery of shoulder joint function. For this purpose, 60 cases with CPHFs were selected, particularly from January 2020 to October 2021. In these cases, 28 cases were treated with a locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) and assigned to the control (Con) group and the remaining 32 patients were treated with IMN and included in the research (Res) group. The therapeutic effect, surgical indicators, total complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative shoulder joint function score were compared between the two arms. We observed that compared with the Con group, the effective rate in the Res group was higher while the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fracture healing time were shorter, the overall complication rate and VAS score were lower, and the postoperative shoulder joint function score was higher, all with statistical significance. The above results indicate that IMN is effective and safe in the treatment of CPHFs, which can validly reduce the discomfort of patients and facilitate the recovery of shoulder joint function.

Functional outcomes before and after implant removal in patients with posttraumatic shoulder stiffness and healed proximal humerus fractures: does implant material (PEEK vs. titanium) have an impact? \u2013 a pilot study

BackgroundPosttraumatic shoulder stiffness remains a problem after proximal humerus fracture (PHF) despite good healing rates. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether the implant material and overlying soft tissue have an effect on shoulder range of motion (ROM) before and after implant removal (IR).Methods16 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 15.3 (SD) years; 62.5% female) were included who underwent operative treatment with locking plates of either carbon fiber reinforced Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) (PEEKPower® humeral fracture plate, Arthrex, Naples, Florida, USA, n = 8) or titanium alloy (Ti) (Philos®, DePuy Synthes, Johnson & Johnson Medical, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA, n = 8) for PHF. All patients presented with a limited ROM and persistent pain in everyday life after the fracture had healed, whereupon IR was indicated. ROM before and after IR were compared as well as the Constant Score (CS) and the CS compared to the contralateral shoulder (%CS) 1 year after IR.ResultsIn group PEEK, elevation was 116.3° ± 19.2° pre- and 129.4° ± 23.7° post-IR (p = 0.027). External rotation was 35.0° ± 7.6° pre- and 50.6° ± 21.8° post-IR (p = 0.041). External rotation with the humerus abducted 90° was 38.8° ± 18.1° pre- and 52.5° ± 25.5° post-IR (p = 0.024). In group Ti, elevation was 110.0° ± 34.6° pre- and 133.8° ± 31.1° post-IR (p = 0.011). External rotation with the humerus at rest was 33.8° ± 23.1° pre- and 48.8° ± 18.7° post-IR (p = 0.048). External rotation with the humerus abducted 90° was 40.0° ± 31.6° pre- and 52.5° ± 22.5° post-IR (p = 0.011). Comparison of the two implant materials showed no significant difference. The overall CS was 90.3 ± 8.8, the %CS was 91.8% ± 14.7%.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in ROM, CS and %CS with respect to plate materials, although lower cell adhesion is reported for the hydrophobic PEEK. However, all patients showed improved functional outcomes after IR in this pilot study. In patients with shoulder stiffness following locked plating for PHF, implants should be removed and open arthrolysis should be performed, independently from the hardware material.Level of evidenceII

Distal humerus extraarticular fractures with large butterfly fragment: How we deal with it

Background: The treatment of distal-third extra-articular fracture of the humerus with large butterfly fragment is challenging and often controversial. The aim of this study is to see the result of open reduction and internal fixation of such fractures fixed with pre-contoured extra-articular anatomical locking plate in context to percentage of union, time of union and functional capability. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study comprising of 28 cases from 2016 to 2019 with average follow-up of 19 months. In this study, all the cases included were extra-articular fractures of distal humerus having large butterfly fragments and were comminuted. The simple distal humeral extra-articular fractures without comminution were excluded from study. All the patients were operated on with posterior triceps reflecting approach and fixing the fractures with 3.5 mm pre-contoured extra-articular locking plate. Results: Out of 28 cases, there were 17 males and 11 females with mean age of 34.8 years. 4 patients were having post injury radial nerve palsy. None of the patients in our series were treated conservatively. The average time of operation after injury was 7 days and the average time of union was 20 weeks. 3 of the patients post operatively developed radial nerve palsy which completely recovered within 5 months. The results were evaluated with Mayo elbow performance score. Conclusion: Distal humeral comminuted extra-articular fractures are complex and difficult to manage. A pre-contoured distal humeral plate is a good option and gives adequate purchase for distal fixation. Moreover, the triceps sparing approach is good and chances of nerve injury and stiffness are less. We are happy with this plate and type of fixation.

Proximal humeral fractures treated with an intramedullary cage and plate: clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively

Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries. Although certain fracture types may benefit from surgery including open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), the optimal method for fixation is unclear. Newer implant designs that improve healing by minimizing hardware failure and recurrent fracture displacement may optimize clinical outcomes. Over a 27-month period, 37 consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated by a single surgeon with a lateral humeral plate through which an intramedullary nitinol cage was inserted. Additional screws were placed through the tuberosities and cage as required. Fractures were classified by both the Neer classification and angulation or displacement in the coronal plane. At most recent follow-up, radiographic results, patient-reported outcome measurements, range of motion, complications, and reoperations were recorded. Thirty-one patients had a minimum of 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The average follow-up period was 91 weeks. By use of the Neer classification, there were 4 two-part, 21 three-part, and 6 four-part fractures. Twenty-one fractures were displaced in valgus and 10 in varus. Outcome measurements at most recent follow-up demonstrated an average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 68; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score of 70; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 27; Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score of 37 and Mental Component Score of 51; Constant score of 55; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score of 29; and Oxford Shoulder Score of 23. Average active range of motion showed forward elevation of 134°, abduction of 91°, external rotation with the arm at the side of 30° (range, -10° to 60°), and internal rotation with the arm at the side to L1 (range, T6-S4). There were 11 complications (35%), including 2 cases of axillary nerve neurapraxia that resolved and 4 cases of avascular necrosis (13%). Unplanned reoperations were performed in 6 patients (19%). One patient underwent revision for loose hardware removal, 1 patient underwent revision ORIF after a fall, and 4 patients required component removal and revision to shoulder arthroplasty. No screw cutout or varus head collapse occurred. The management of proximal humeral fractures remains challenging. Our results demonstrate similar fracture healing, clinical improvement, and complication rates compared with conventional ORIF with screws and a side plate. At 1 year of follow-up, there were low rates of recurrent fracture displacement and screw cutout. There was a higher-than-expected rate of avascular necrosis as compared with other studies using a similar fixation construct. Larger studies and longer follow-up may demonstrate decreased rates of revision surgery and superior outcomes. Additional studies may determine whether this fixation method is superior to others for proximal humeral fractures.

The risk of iatrogenic radial nerve and/or profunda brachii artery injury in anterolateral humeral plating using a 4.5 mm narrow DCP: A cadaveric study.

Fixation of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screws can endanger the neurovascular structure if proper care is not taken. No studies to our knowledge have studied the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve and/or profunda brachii artery (RNPBA) injury from each screw hole of a 4.5 mm narrow dynamic compression plate (narrow DCP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk of RNPBA injury in anterolateral humeral plating with a 4.5 mm narrow DCP. 18 humeri of 9 fresh-frozen cadavers in the supine position were exposed via the anterolateral approach with 45 degrees of arm abduction. A hypothetical fracture line was marked at the midpoint of each humerus. A precontoured ten-hole 4.5mm narrow DCP was applied to the anterolateral surface of the humerus using the fracture line to position the center of the plate. All screw holes were drilled and screws inserted. The cadaver was then turned over to the prone position with 45 degrees of arm abduction, and the RNPBA exposed. The holes through in which 100% of the screw had contact with or penetrated the RNPBA were identified as dangerous screw holes, while lesser percentages of contact were defined as risky. The relative distance ratios of the entire humeral length from the lateral epicondyle of the humerus to the 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st proximal holes were 0.64, 0.60, 0.56 and 0.52, respectively. The most dangerous screw hole was the 2nd proximal, in which all 18 screws had contacted or penetrated the nerve, followed by the risky 1st (12/18), 3rd (8/18) and 4th (2/18) holes. In humeral shaft plating with the 4.5mm narrow DCP using the anterolateral approach, the 2nd proximal screw hole carries the highest risk of iatrogenic radial nerve and/or profunda brachii artery injury.

The missing piece of the trauma armoury-medial femoral condyle plate

Fixation of distal femoral fractures is often challenging due to the fracture configuration and associated poor bone quality. Dual plating (lateral and medial) has become an acceptable option to provide improved stability versus a single plate fixation.Though there are several commercially available anatomically designed plates for the lateral femoral condyle, there is no anatomic plate available in UK specifically for medial fixation of distal femur fractures.Our aim is to determine the best suited pre-contoured plate for stabilising the medial femoral condyle (MFC).Right sided femur sawbones were used to determine how well 18 different pre-contoured anatomical plates (Depuy Synthes, Leeds, UK) fit the medial femoral condyle. Some of these had variable angle (VA) option. Lift off, fit and notch penetration were assessed and recorded independently by 4 orthopaedic trauma surgeons. The number and distribution of screws in the MFC that each plate allowed was also determined. To do this the MFC was divided into quadrants: Proximal anterior (PA), distal anterior (DA), proximal posterior (PP) and distal posterior (DP).The ipsilateral anterolateral proximal tibial (VA and 4.5 mm non-VA), PHILOS, posteromedial proximal tibial and ipsilateral lateral extra-articular distal humeral plate offered good sagittal fit, less than 2 mm lift off at the condyles and no diaphyseal lift off. Plate positioning in the PA quadrant offered the best fit.The ipsilateral anterolateral proximal tibial plates (VA) and PHILOS allowed at least 4 screws to be placed in the PA and 2 in the PP quadrant with no notch penetration. The Tomofix provided good fit, but all 4 screws were in PA quadrant, with distal screws causing notch penetration. The non-VA and PHILOS plates did not offer the VA advantage.The ipsilateral anterolateral proximal tibial VA plates provided the best anatomical fit for the MFC with the greatest number of screws in the condylar quadrants with the option of variable angle screw placement.

One-year follow-up after treatment of proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures with a helical plate: healing rates, complications and functional outcome measures

BackgroundConventional plate osteosynthesis is a valuable treatment option in displaced proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures. Nonetheless, this procedure can be complicated by a radial nerve palsy. To date, many surgical techniques have been developed in an attempt to minimize this high-impact complication. A helical plate has the potential to avoid an iatrogenic radial nerve palsy due to its design. This article aims to evaluate safety and functional outcomes of patients treated with a helical plate compared to conventional plate osteosynthesis. In particular healing rates, complications and functional outcome measures.MethodsWe retrospectively included all patients with displaced proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures who were treated with a helical plate from October 2016 until August 2018 at a single level-1 trauma center (AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium). A self-molded long PHILOS plate (DePuy Synthes®) or a pre-contoured A.L.P.S proximal humeral plating system (Zimmer Biomet®) were used. Patient baseline characteristics and standard radiographs were obtained pre- and postoperatively. We retrospectively searched for complications. Patients were reassessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Constant Murley (CMS) and EQ-5D-5L scores with a minimal follow-up of 1 year.ResultsThe humeral shaft fractures of all sixteen patients consolidated within 3 months and no iatrogenic radial nerve palsies were observed. One plate had to be removed after 1 year due to a late deep infection. With a minimum follow up of 1 year, the mean DASH score was 22 ± 19 and the mean normalized CMS was 80 ± 19.ConclusionOperative treatment of proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures with a helical plate is a safe procedure with good to excellent shoulder function at one-year follow-up. Contrary to conventional plate osteosynthesis, a helical plate has the potential to completely avoid a radial nerve palsy, while maintaining similar healing rates and functional outcomes.Trial registrationRetrospective cohort study. B396201939564. Registered on 10 MAY 2019.

MORFOMETRIA CAUDA-CLOACAL PARA SEXAGEM DE Phrynops geoffroanus (SCHWEIGGER, 1812)

In order to study the presence of sexual dimorphism in Phrynops geoffroanus , collections were carried out in the Leite stream in the municipality of Floriano-Piaui. The 22 specimens captured (13 males e 9 female) were measured and sexed, considering quantitative data (pre-cloacal and post-cloacal distances, length and width of the anal plate) and qualitative data (narrow or wide head and length of the humeral plates). Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (U), Dummy variable (D) and linear regression. The U Test demonstrated that the variables anal plate length (α = 0.177), pre-cloacal distance (α = 0.0004) and post-cloacal distance (α = 0.038) showed significant differences between genders. Through linear regression it was possible to observe that the pre-cloacal and post-cloacal length measurements in males have values twice as high as in females. The Dummy variable resulted in a value of D = 7.14, demonstrating that there is reason to believe in the existence of dimorphic morphological patterns in P . geoffroanus . From the results found, it is possible to conclude that the measurements of anal plate, pre-cloacal and post-cloacal distances are different between males and females in the studied population of P . geoffroanus , confirming sexual dimorphism, however, further studies of different populations are required in order to establish a morphological pattern for the species. Keywords: Morphology; Sexual dimorphism; Turtles.

How to Treat Proximal and Middle One-Third Humeral Shaft Fractures: The Role of Helical Plates

Complex proximal third diaphyseal humeral fractures are uncommon patterns of injury mainly caused by high energy trauma. The anatomical shape of the humerus, the presence of the deltoid tuberosity and the close proximity of the radial nerve into the radial groove represent challenge elements to deal with. Historically, straight plates were manually twisted; subsequently, helical plates created for other anatomical sites (as distal tibia) were used in humeral fractures. In both these experiences surgeons observed several disadvantages. More recently, dedicated helical plates have been created. In this study, we expose our surgical technique for using helical humeral plates (A.L.P.S.® Proximal Humeral Plating System, Zimmer Biomet), with its advantages and operative recommendation. From 2019 to 2021, nine patients who were admitted to our institution for humeral fractures involving the proximal third diaphysis have been treated with humeral helical plates. At one and six months after surgery, standard antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained, and at last follow-up (fourteen months on average) clinical evaluation was performed through range of motion assessment, Constant score and DASH score questionnaires. At six months, all fractures have healed. At last follow-up (fourteen months on average, 6–22) the average range of motion were flexion 135° (90–180°); abduction 124° (85–180°); external rotation 52° (20–80°), internal rotation at L3 (between scapulae-trochanter). Average Constant Shoulder Score was 70 (33–96), average Dash score was 21 (range 1,7–63). Three patients experienced temporary radial nerve palsy from injury, with subsequently improvement at EMG analysis within eight months from surgery. In our opinion this strategy avoids the deltoid tuberosity and reduces the risk of radial nerve injury, increasing the possibility of a rapid functional recovery after surgery.

The humeral head push-pull plate technique significantly diminishes secondary complications in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Varus Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures

The humeral head push-pull plate technique significantly diminishes secondary complications in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Varus Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures

The Relationship between Plate and Screw to Ulnar Nerve in Distal Humeral Fracture: A Cadaveric Study

Background: Plate and screw fixation during the treatment of distal humeral fracture in adults is considered to be a gold standard that makes anatomic and articular reduction. Injury of the ulnar nerve is a common condition that can be found in pre-operative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Intraoperative anterior subcutaneous transposition is still a controversial issue. Objective: To understand the variation of distance of the ulnar nerve during elbow motion with the anatomical landmark of distal humeral bone and plate position after fixation. Materials and Methods: The authors have studied ten fresh adult cadavers, who underwent autopsy at the Department of Forensic Medicine of Srinakharinwirot University. Results: The results showed that in zone 2, the Center of the medial condyle was the position of the distal humeral bone with the most variation in position changing during elbow flexion/extension. In the sagittal plane (+2.56 to –4.58 mm), the mean difference equaled to 7.14 mm, while in the coronal plane (+1.70 to –5.14 mm), the mean difference equaled to 6.84 mm, with the highest percentage of irritation up to 70%. Furthermore, 14 cases of ulnar nerve subluxation were found in 20 studies (70%). Conclusion: From the present study, the Medial condyle was the landmark with the most irritation and position changing of ulnar nerve during elbow flexion. The incidence of ulnar subluxation occurred after in situ release for plate fixation was also found higher than in previous studies. Keywords: Plate and screw fixation; Ulnar nerve injury; Distal humeral fracture; Anterior subcutaneous nerve transposition; Cadaveric study; Anatomical bony landmark of distal humeral bone; Ulnar nerve subluxation