Human speech perception declines in the presence of masking speech, particularly when the masker is intelligible and acoustically similar to the target. A prior investigation demonstrated a substantial reduction in masking when the intelligibility of competing speech was reduced by corrupting voiced segments with noise [Huo, Sun, Fogerty, and Tang (2023), "Quantifying informational masking due to masker intelligibility in same-talker speech-in-speech perception," in Interspeech 2023, pp. 1783-1787]. As this processing also reduced the prominence of voiced segments, it was unclear whether the unmasking was due to reduced linguistic content, acoustic similarity, or both. The current study compared the masking of original competing speech (high intelligibility) to competing speech with time reversal of voiced segments (VS-reversed, low intelligibility) at various target-to-masker ratios. Modeling results demonstrated similar energetic masking between the two maskers. However, intelligibility of the target speech was considerably better with the VS-reversed masker compared to the original masker, likely due to the reduced linguistic content. Further corrupting the masker's voiced segments resulted in additional release from masking. Acoustic analyses showed that the portion of target voiced segments overlapping with masker voiced segments and the similarity between target and masker overlapped voiced segments impacted listeners' speech recognition. Evidence also suggested modulation masking in the spectro-temporal domain interferes with listeners' ability to glimpse the target.
Read full abstract