BackgroundEosinophilic asthma is increasingly recognized as one of the most severe and difficult-to-treat asthma subtypes. The JAK/STAT pathway is the principal signaling mechanism for a variety of cytokines and growth factors involved in asthma. However, the direct effect of JAK inhibitors on eosinophil effector function has not been addressed thus far. ObjectiveHere we compared the effects of the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib and the JAK3 inhibitor tofacitinib on eosinophil effector function in vitro and in vivo. MethodsDifferentiation of murine bone marrow-derived eosinophils. Migratory responsiveness, respiratory burst, phagocytosis and apoptosis of human peripheral blood eosinophils were assessed in vitro. In vivo effects were investigated in a mouse model of acute house dust mite-induced airway inflammation in BALB/c mice. ResultsBaricitinib more potently induced apoptosis and inhibited eosinophil chemotaxis and respiratory burst, while baricitinib and tofacitinib similarly affected eosinophil differentiation and phagocytosis. Of the JAK inhibitors, oral application of baricitinib more potently prevented lung eosinophilia in mice following allergen challenge. However, both JAK inhibitors neither affected airway resistance nor compliance. ConclusionOur data suggest that the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib is even more potent than the JAK3 inhibitor tofacitinib in suppressing eosinophil effector function. Thus, targeting the JAK1/2 pathway represents a promising therapeutic strategy for eosinophilic inflammation as observed in severe eosinophilic asthma.
Read full abstract