OBJECTIVE: The implantation site can be estimated from the location of the early gestational sacs (GS) by transvaginal ultrasound. The objective of this study was to investigate the most frequent implantation site and to compare the implantation sites of pregnancies after embryo transfer (ET) and natural conceived pregnancies.DESIGN: Prospective study.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 426 singleton pregnancies (244 of IVF-ET, 181 of natural conception) were analysed. In all embryo transfers, the catheter was introduced into the endometrial cavity guided by abdominal ultrasound, with the catheter tip placed at the upper point of the endometrial cavity. Gestational sacs (GS) were evaluated with two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound between the 4th and the 6th weeks of gestation. The uterine cavity was divided into four parts (fundal, upper, middle and lower regions) and the upper and middle region was subdivided into lateral, middle anterior and middle posterior areas, making a total of 8 areas.RESULTS: Of the 425 singleton pregnancies, 76%(323/425) of the GS were detected in the fundal and upper region, 21.2%(90/425) in the middle region and 2.8%(12/425) in the lower region. The upper posterior area was the most frequent implantation site in both IVF-ET and natural conception (24.3%, 23.8%). There was no statistical difference in the implantation sites between IVF-ET and natural conception. And also there was no statistical difference in the miscarriage rate of each region.CONCLUSIONS: When embryos were transferred to the upper area of the uterine cavity, the implantation sites of IVF-ET pregnancies were not different from that of naturally conceived pregnancies. The endometrium suitable for human blastocyst implantation was at the upper area of the uterine cavity, especially upper posterior area. OBJECTIVE: The implantation site can be estimated from the location of the early gestational sacs (GS) by transvaginal ultrasound. The objective of this study was to investigate the most frequent implantation site and to compare the implantation sites of pregnancies after embryo transfer (ET) and natural conceived pregnancies. DESIGN: Prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 426 singleton pregnancies (244 of IVF-ET, 181 of natural conception) were analysed. In all embryo transfers, the catheter was introduced into the endometrial cavity guided by abdominal ultrasound, with the catheter tip placed at the upper point of the endometrial cavity. Gestational sacs (GS) were evaluated with two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound between the 4th and the 6th weeks of gestation. The uterine cavity was divided into four parts (fundal, upper, middle and lower regions) and the upper and middle region was subdivided into lateral, middle anterior and middle posterior areas, making a total of 8 areas. RESULTS: Of the 425 singleton pregnancies, 76%(323/425) of the GS were detected in the fundal and upper region, 21.2%(90/425) in the middle region and 2.8%(12/425) in the lower region. The upper posterior area was the most frequent implantation site in both IVF-ET and natural conception (24.3%, 23.8%). There was no statistical difference in the implantation sites between IVF-ET and natural conception. And also there was no statistical difference in the miscarriage rate of each region. CONCLUSIONS: When embryos were transferred to the upper area of the uterine cavity, the implantation sites of IVF-ET pregnancies were not different from that of naturally conceived pregnancies. The endometrium suitable for human blastocyst implantation was at the upper area of the uterine cavity, especially upper posterior area.