Hours Of Shock Onset Research Articles

Relationship between thrombocytopenia and prognosis in children with septic shock: a retrospective cohort study

Septic shock is a life-threatening disease worldwide often associated with thrombocytopenia. Platelets play a crucial role in bridging the gap between immunity, coagulation, and endothelial cell activation, potentially influencing the course of the disease. However, there are few studies specifically evaluating the impact of thrombocytopenia on the prognosis of pediatric patients. Therefore, the study investigates effects of early thrombocytopenia in the prognosis of children with septic shock. Pediatric patients with septic shock from 2015 to 2022 were included monocentrically. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of <100 × 109/L during the first 24 hours of septic shock onset. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was used to pair patients with different platelet counts on admission but comparable disease severity. A total of 419 pediatric patients were included in the analysis. Patients with thrombocytopenia had higher 28-day mortality (55.5% vs. 38.7%, p = .005) compared to patients with no thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia was associated with reduced 28-PICU free days (median value, 0 vs. 13 days, p = .003) and 28-ventilator-free (median value, 0 vs. 19 days, p = .001) days. Among thrombocytopenia patients, those with platelet count ≤50 × 109/L had a higher 28-day mortality rate (63.6% vs. 45%, p = .02). Multiple logistic regression showed that elevated lactate (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04–1.17; P <0.001) and white blood cell (WBC) count (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95–0.99; p = .003) were independent risk factors for the development of thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia group had increased bleeding events, blood product transfusions, and development of organ failure. In Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, survival probabilities at 28 days were greater in patients without thrombocytopenia (p value from the log-rank test, p = .004). There were no significant differences in the type of pathogenic microorganisms and the site of infection between patients with and without thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, thrombocytopenia within 24 hours of shock onset is associated with an increased risk of 28-day mortality in pediatric patients with septic shock.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin versus albumin 4% in paediatric toxic shock syndrome: a randomised controlled feasibility study

PurposeToxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare disease responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IG) therapy in paediatric TSS could improve shock and organ failure, but more consistent...

Effects of Timing of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Shock. An Analysis of the Multicenter Prospective Observational VOLUME-CHASERS Cohort.

Objectives: Describe the variation in practice and identify predictors of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) use in shock. Explore the association between the timing of IMV initiation ("Early" vs. "Delayed") on shock duration. Design: Multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018 Setting: 34 hospitals in the United States and Jordan. Patients: Consecutive, adult, critically ill patients with shock, defined as a systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90mm Hg, mean arterial pressure less than or equal to 65mm Hg, or need for a vasopressor medication. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: "Early" IMV was defined as starting IMV 0-6 hours of shock onset and "Delayed" IMV was defined as starting IMV between 6 and 48 hours of shock onset. The primary outcome was shock-free days, defined as the number of days without shock after the first 48 hours of shock onset. Variation and predictors of IMV use were examined within the whole cohort as well as the subgroup of those intubated within 0-48 hours of shock onset. Mixed effects modeling with hospital site as a random effect showed that there was 7% variation by site in the use and timing of IMV in this shock cohort. In a propensity-matched model for the timing of IMV, "Early" IMV after shock onset was associated with more shock-free days when compared to "Delayed" IMV in those intubated within 0-48 hours of shock onset (Beta coefficient 0.65 days, 95% CI 0.14-1.16 days). Conclusions: Timing of IMV initiation for patients in shock has potentially important implications for patient outcomes and merits further study.

Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study.

To characterize the association between the use of physiologic assessment (central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, passive leg raise test, and critical care ultrasound) with fluid and vasopressor administration 24 hours after shock onset and with in-hospital mortality. Multicenter prospective cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018. Thirty-four hospitals in the United States and Jordan. Consecutive adult patients requiring admission to the ICU with systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg, mean arterial blood pressure less than or equal to 65 mm Hg, or need for vasopressor. None. Of 1,639 patients enrolled, 39% had physiologic assessments. Use of physiologic assessment was not associated with cumulative fluid administered within 24 hours of shock onset, after accounting for baseline characteristics, etiology and location of shock, ICU types, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and hospital (beta coefficient, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.15). In multivariate analysis, the use of physiologic assessment was associated with a higher likelihood of vasopressor use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.45-2.71) and higher 24-hour cumulative vasopressor dosing as norepinephrine equivalent (beta coefficient, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55). The use of vasopressor was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.78). In-hospital mortality was not associated with the use of physiologic assessment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.18). The use of physiologic assessment in the 24 hours after shock onset is associated with increased use of vasopressor but not with fluid administration.

Evaluation of Vasopressor Exposure and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock*

The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine the association between vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 6 hours and first 24 hours after the onset of septic shock and 30-day in-hospital mortality; 2) determine whether the effect of vasopressor dosing intensity varies by fluid resuscitation volume; and 3) determine whether the effect of vasopressor dosing intensity varies by dosing titration pattern. Multicenter prospective cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018. Vasopressor dosing intensity was defined as the total vasopressor dose infused across all vasopressors in norepinephrine equivalents. Thirty-three hospital sites in the United States (n = 32) and Jordan (n = 1). Consecutive adults requiring admission to the ICU with septic shock treated with greater than or equal to 1 vasopressor within 24 hours of shock onset. None. Out of 1,639 patients screened, 616 were included. Norepinephrine (93%) was the most common vasopressor. Patients received a median of 3,400 mL (interquartile range, 1,851-5,338 mL) during the 24 hours after shock diagnosis. The median vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 24 hours of shock onset was 8.5 μg/min norepinephrine equivalents (3.4-18.1 μg/min norepinephrine equivalents). In the first 6 hours, increasing vasopressor dosing intensity was associated with increased odds ratio of 30-day in-hospital mortality, with the strength of association dependent on concomitant fluid administration. Over the entire 24 hour period, every 10 μg/min increase in vasopressor dosing intensity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.53), and this association did not vary with the amount of fluid administration. Compared to an early high/late low vasopressor dosing strategy, an early low/late high or sustained high vasopressor dosing strategy was associated with higher mortality. Increasing vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 24 hours after septic shock was associated with increased mortality. This association varied with the amount of early fluid administration and the timing of vasopressor titration.

A Comparison of Initial Monotherapy with Norepinephrine Versus Vasopressin for Resuscitation in Septic Shock

Early goal-directed therapy is a time-sensitive therapeutic algorithm with a tiered approach to target hypoperfusion and cardiovascular collapse within the first 6 hours of septic shock. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend norepinephrine or dopamine as the initial vasoactive agent for resuscitation in septic shock, reserving the administration of vasopressin as adjunctive therapy. To determine whether vasopressin was noninferior to norepinephrine as the initial vasopressor to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal in the first 6 hours of shock onset. This retrospective cohort study evaluated adults who received monotherapy with either norepinephrine or vasopressin as initial vasoactive therapy for the management of septic shock. Patients were excluded if the treatment arm was not monotherapy, if they were admitted to a cardiology or cardiothoracic surgery service, or if they lacked a comparator-based 1:1 frequency matching. A total of 130 patients were included, 65 in each treatment arm. The proportion of patients who achieved a goal MAP in the vasopressin group was 63% (95% CI 51%-75%) and was 67.7% (95% CI 56%-79%) in the norepinephrine group. This observed difference between goal MAP attainment did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin of -25% (CI for 4.7% difference -21.2% to 12%), suggesting noninferiority of vasopressin. No significant difference was identified between vasopressin and norepinephrine for final mean (SD) MAP achieved (75 [9.6] and 76.0 [8.2] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.06) or the mean total change from baseline MAP to goal (14.1 [8.4] and 15.1 [9.1] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.6). Vasopressin was noninferior to norepinephrine for the achievement of a MAP goal in the first 6 hours from onset of septic shock. Further prospective analysis is warranted; however, the results are useful for consideration of alternative vasopressors in the setting of drug shortages.

Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality

IntroductionSeptic shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Unfortunately, the optimal fluid management of septic shock is unknown and currently is empirical.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St. Louis, Missouri). Consecutive patients (n = 325) hospitalized with septic shock who had echocardiographic examinations performed within 24 hours of shock onset were enrolled.ResultsA total of 163 (50.2%) patients with septic shock died during hospitalization. Non-survivors had a significantly larger positive net fluid balance within the 24 hour window of septic shock onset (median (IQR): 4,374 ml (1,637 ml, 7,260 ml) vs. 2,959 ml (1,639.5 ml, 4,769.5 ml), P = 0.004). The greatest quartile of positive net fluid balance at 24 hours and eight days post-shock onset respectively were found to predict hospital mortality, and the greatest quartile of positive net fluid balance at eight days post-shock onset was an independent predictor of hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.66; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.98; P = 0.004). Survivors were significantly more likely to have mild left ventricular dysfunction as evaluated by bedside echocardiography and non-survivors had slightly elevated left ventricular ejection fraction, which was also found to be an independent predictor of outcome.ConclusionsOur data confirms the importance of fluid balance and cardiac function as outcome predictors in patients with septic shock. A clinical trial to determine the optimal administration of intravenous fluids to patients with septic shock is needed.

Glucocorticoids in sepsis: dissecting facts from fiction

Dr Marik’s recent commentary [1] states that “..as a result of an overwhelming selection bias, only approximately 5% of eligible patients were enrolled in the CORTICUS study [2].” As its authors, we are unaware as to what constitutes this overwhelming bias and from where he has plucked a fi gure of 5%. CORTICUS enrolled patients with clinical evidence of infection, systemic infl ammatory response syndrome, shock within 72 hours (defi ned by a systolic blood pressure 0.1 mcg/kg/ minute within 12 hours of shock onset is not supported by any evidence base, contradicts presently accepted international recommendations [4] and portrays a far more striking example of bias.

Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 levels predict outcomes of pneumonia-related septic shock patients: a prospective observational study

IntroductionDespite recent advances in the management of septic shock, mortality rates are still unacceptably high. Early identification of the high-mortality risk group for early intervention remains an issue under exploration. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (sVEGFR1) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) have diverse effects in the pathogenesis of sepsis, which involve pro-inflammation, anti-inflammation, endothelial cell repair, and vascular permeability change. Their roles in predicting mortality and organ dysfunction remain to be clarified.MethodsPneumonia-related septic shock patients from medical intensive care units were enrolled for this prospective observational study. We also included 20 patients with pneumonia without organ dysfunction for comparison. Plasma levels of VEGF and sVEGFR1 and uPA activity within 24 hours of shock onset were measured. We compared plasma levels of these biomarkers with APACHE II scores between subgroups of patients, and evaluated their predictive value for 28-day mortality and organ dysfunction.ResultsA total of 101 patients, including 81 with pneumonia-related septic shock and 20 with pneumonia without organ dysfunction, were enrolled. Non-survivors of septic shock had significantly higher plasma sVEGFR1 levels (659.3 ± 1022.8 vs. 221.1 ± 268.9 pg/mL, respectively, P < 0.001) and uPA activity (47.2 ± 40.6 vs. 27.6 ± 17.2 units, respectively, P = 0.001) when compared with those of the survivors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher mortality in patients with higher levels of sVEGFR1 (P < 0.001) and uPA activity (P = 0.031). In Cox regression analysis, plasma sVEGFR1 level was independently associated with, and best predicted, the 28-day mortality of septic shock (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.05-2.30). Plasma sVEGFR1 level and uPA activity had good correlation with renal dysfunction, metabolic acidosis, and hematologic dysfunction; their levels significantly increased when the number of organ dysfunctions increased. In multivariate analysis, plasma sVEGFR1 level (HR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.17-6.81) and uPA activity (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.06-7.13) were independent predictors of the presence of concomitant multi-organ dysfunction. The predictive value of VEGF for mortality and organ dysfunction was limited in pneumonia-related septic shock patients.ConclusionsHigh plasma sVEGFR1 level in the early stage of pneumonia-related septic shock independently predicted 28-day mortality and multi-organ dysfunction.

Steroid use in PROWESS severe sepsis patients treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated)

IntroductionIn a study conducted by Annane, patients with septic shock and unresponsive to adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation receiving low-dose steroid therapy had prolonged survival but not significantly improved 28-day mortality. The present study examines intravenous steroid use in PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) patients meeting the Annane enrollment criteria (AEC).MethodsAdrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation tests were not done in PROWESS. Steroids were allowed but their use was not directed. Patients were identified using AEC (all of: randomization to study drug treatment within 8 hours of shock onset; infection, fever, or hypothermia; tachycardia; systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg on vasopressors; mechanical ventilation; and one of urine <0.5 ml/kg per hour, lactic acidosis, or arterial oxygen tension/inspired fractional oxygen <280). We examined steroid use and mortality data; additional analyses were done outside the 8-hour window.ResultsSteroid-treated patients were older, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores and more organ dysfunctions, and were more commonly receiving mechanical ventilation. Among patients meeting AEC, regardless of steroid treatment (n = 97), mortality in the placebo and drotrecogin alfa (activated) groups was 38% (19/50) and 28% (13/47), respectively (relative risk [RR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.30). When using AEC but excluding the requirement for randomization within 8 hours of shock onset (n = 612), placebo mortality was 38% (118/313) and drotrecogin alfa (activated) mortality was 29% (88/299; RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98). Using AEC but excluding the 8-hour window and with steroids initiated at baseline and/or infusion (n = 228) resulted in mortality for placebo and drotrecogin alfa (activated) groups of 43% (51/118) and 33% (36/110), respectively (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.54–1.06).ConclusionPatients with severe sepsis from the PROWESS trial who were likely to respond to low-dose steroids according to the AEC were those patients at a high risk for death. However, when using the AEC, regardless of steroid use, patients exhibited a survival benefit from treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated).