e20622 Background: Despite the arrival of drugs targeting EGFR exon 20 insertions mutations (ex20ins) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), testing practices for this specific mutation vary widely between hospitals. In addition, there is a lack of real world data on incidence of ex20ins in different countries in Asia. This study tracks real-world ex20ins incidence by country/region as well as by methodology across 5 different Asian markets. Methods: Ipsos’ Exon 20 Insertion Tracker is an ongoing physician-reported syndicated study. Hospitals in Asia (n = 7 in South Korea; n = 5 in Taiwan; n = 4 in India; n = 5 in Thailand; n = 1 in Hong Kong) were asked to submit data on total number of NSCLC patients tested for EGFR mutations using single marker tests vs multi-gene panel tests, and subsequently asked how many tested positive for ex20ins. Data were collected online on a regular basis from September 2022 in South Korea and Taiwan, from January 2023 in India, and from September 2023 in Thailand and Hong Kong, until December 2023 in all markets. A total of n = 7,657 EGFR-tested patients in South Korea, n = 2,260 in Taiwan, n = 3,970 in India, n = 407 in Thailand and n = 114 in Hong Kong were reported on. Results: Incidence of ex20ins was markedly higher in Hong Kong (3.5%) and Taiwan (3.7%) than in South Korea (1.6%), India (1.4%) and Thailand (1.0%), pointing to a potentially higher incidence in Greater China compared to other parts of Asia. Among this cohort, the use of panel testing for EGFR mutations was highest in India (99%) and lowest in Taiwan (1%). Across the markets, incidence of ex20ins appears to be somewhat higher among those tested with single-marker EGFR tests (2.2%) than those tested with panel-based tests (1.4%), although the opposite was observed in Thailand and Hong Kong. Conclusions: In this large study based on testing results from over 14,400 EGFR-tested patients across 5 different markets in Asia, clear differences in observed incidence of ex20ins mutations were observed, with the incidence in Taiwan being nearly 4 times as high as that in Thailand. This highlights that different testing and biomarker sequencing strategies may be necessary in markets with the highest observed incidence. A secondary finding from this study is that test methodology does appear to have an impact on observed incidence, though this is in part due to very different testing approaches (single-marker vs panel-based) between markets, with the majority of hospitals included in the study in Taiwan preferring a single-marker approach. [Table: see text]