Hospitalization In Older Adults Research Articles

A novel electronic health record-based, machine-learning model to predict severe hypoglycemia leading to hospitalizations in older adults with diabetes: A territory-wide cohort and modeling study.

Older adults with diabetes are at high risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH). Many machine-learning (ML) models predict short-term hypoglycemia are not specific for older adults and show poor precision-recall. We aimed to develop a multidimensional, electronic health record (EHR)-based ML model to predict one-year risk of SH requiring hospitalization in older adults with diabetes. We adopted a case-control design for a retrospective territory-wide cohort of 1,456,618 records from 364,863 unique older adults (age ≥65 years) with diabetes and at least 1 Hong Kong Hospital Authority attendance from 2013 to 2018. We used 258 predictors including demographics, admissions, diagnoses, medications, and routine laboratory tests in a one-year period to predict SH events requiring hospitalization in the following 12 months. The cohort was randomly split into training, testing, and internal validation sets in a 7:2:1 ratio. Six ML algorithms were evaluated including logistic-regression, random forest, gradient boost machine, deep neural network (DNN), XGBoost, and Rulefit. We tested our model in a temporal validation cohort in the Hong Kong Diabetes Register with predictors defined in 2018 and outcome events defined in 2019. Predictive performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) statistics, and positive predictive value (PPV). We identified 11,128 SH events requiring hospitalization during the observation periods. The XGBoost model yielded the best performance (AUROC = 0.978 [95% CI 0.972 to 0.984]; AUPRC = 0.670 [95% CI 0.652 to 0.688]; PPV = 0.721 [95% CI 0.703 to 0.739]). This was superior to an 11-variable conventional logistic-regression model comprised of age, sex, history of SH, hypertension, blood glucose, kidney function measurements, and use of oral glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) (AUROC = 0.906; AUPRC = 0.085; PPV = 0.468). Top impactful predictors included non-use of lipid-regulating drugs, in-patient admission, urgent emergency triage, insulin use, and history of SH. External validation in the HKDR cohort yielded AUROC of 0.856 [95% CI 0.838 to 0.873]. Main limitations of this study included limited transportability of the model and lack of geographically independent validation. Our novel-ML model demonstrated good discrimination and high precision in predicting one-year risk of SH requiring hospitalization. This may be integrated into EHR decision support systems for preemptive intervention in older adults at highest risk.

Preventing functional decline in hospitalized older adults in medical ward: a best practice implementation project.

Functional decline frequently occurs in older adults in hospitals. The aim of this project was to promote evidence-based strategies for physical activity to prevent functional decline in hospitalized older adults in a medical center in southern Taiwan. This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Seven audit criteria were derived from a JBI evidence summary and a baseline audit involving 25 nurses and 30 hospitalized older adults was conducted to compare current practice with best practice recommendations. The JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool was used to identify barriers to implementation, and strategies were developed to overcome those barriers. A follow-up audit was conducted to measure any changes in compliance. After implementing the strategies, the pass rate of nursing staff improved in the physical activity knowledge test, rising from 56% to 88%. Compliance of nursing staff with providing physical activity instructions using evidence-based guidelines to hospitalized older adults reached 80%. The incidence of functional decline among hospitalized older adults decreased from 36.7% to 20%. The results of this best practice implementation project suggest that initiating physical activity as early as possible for hospitalized older adults once their medical condition has stabilized can help prevent functional decline. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A171.

Association of COVID-19 vaccination with duration of hospitalization in older adults in Hong Kong

IntroductionThe association between COVID-19 vaccination and length of hospital stay may provide further insight into vaccination benefits, but few studies have investigated such associations in detail. We aimed to investigate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients during Omicron waves in Hong Kong, and explore potential predictors. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted on local patients aged ≥60 years who were admitted due to COVID-19 infection in Hong Kong in 2022, from 1 February to 22 November, and with 28 days of follow-up since admission. The exposure was either not vaccinated; or having received 2/3/4 doses of CoronaVac (Sinovac); or 2/3/4 doses of BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer). Length of stay in hospital was the main outcome. Accelerated failure time models were used to quantify variation in hospital stay for vaccinated compared with unvaccinated patients, accounting for age, sex, comorbidity, type of vaccine and number of doses received, care home residence and admission timing; stratified by age groups and epidemic waves. ResultsThis study included 32,398 patients aged 60 years and above for main analysis, their median (IQR) age was 79 (71–87) years, 53% were men, and 40% were unvaccinated. The patients were stratified by confirmation prior to or since 23 May 2022, resulting in a sample size of 15,803 and 16,595 in those two waves respectively. Vaccinated patients were found to have 13–39% shorter hospital stay compared to unvaccinated patients. More vaccine doses received were associated with shorter hospital stay, and BNT162b2 recipients had slightly shorter hospital stays than CoronaVac recipients. ConclusionVaccination was associated with reduced hospital stay in breakthrough infections. Increased vaccination uptake in older adults may improve hospital bed turnover and public health outcomes especially during large community epidemics.

Dietary mineral intakes predict Coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) incidence and hospitalization in older adults

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the association between dietary mineral intake and Coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and its associated hospitalization.MethodsThis cohort study utilized the MASHAD study population, which comprised individuals aged 35–65. Upon recruitment in 2007, dietary intake was documented using a validated 65-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Data on COVID-19 PCR test results was collected from all relevant medical centers in Mashhad between February 2020 and June 2022. The regression model included dietary minerals and employed the backward variable selection method, along with advanced data analysis techniques.ResultsThe final analysis involved 1957 participants, including 193 COVID-19-positive patients. The mean age was 49.71 and 50.28 years in the COVID-19-positive and negative groups, respectively (p = 0.12). Dietary intakes of magnesium, iron, and potassium were notably lower in COVID-19-positive patients (P < 0.05). Following adjustments for age and sex, dietary iron remained significantly associated with COVID-19 incidence (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98). Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was observed between dietary zinc and hospitalization due to COVID-19 (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51–0.93). In dynamical system models, intakes of calcium, zinc, and iron below the cut-offs of 1138, 9.7, and 8.17 mg/day, respectively, were linked to an increased risk of COVID-19 incidence.ConclusionHigher dietary iron and zinc intake are associated with decreased risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization, respectively.

The epidemic of immobility in hospitalized patients: How to get your patient up and moving

The global population is ageing and with cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence also increasing, the face of the prototypical cardiology inpatient is changing, from a middle-aged man with cardiovascular risk factors, to an older adult with multimorbidity and frailty. Hospital care is inherently harmful, with immobilization and reliance on others causing functional decline to be the leading complication of hospitalization in older adults. It is imperative to reinvent hospital care, employing age-friendly health systems to maintain health and function in older adults, improving not only CVD outcomes, but patient-centered outcomes such as function and independence and preventing avoidable harms.

Impact of a clinical pharmacist‐led COVID‐19 treatment consult service in two primary care seniors clinics

AbstractIntroductionHealthcare utilization due to COVID‐19 infection is more prevalent in the older adult population. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is an oral antiviral option that can decrease the hospitalizations in older adults but has many of drug–drug interactions that need evaluation.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist COVID‐19 treatment consult service.MethodsClinical pharmacists were consulted to assess and provide COVID‐19 therapy recommendations for adults 65 years and older who tested positive for COVID‐19 in two primary care clinics. Recommendations for the most appropriate COVID‐19 therapy were sent to the primary care provider for review and discussed with the patient. Healthcare utilization, reinfection with COVID‐19, and safety of COVID‐19 therapies were evaluated.ResultsOne hundred and twenty four patients, average age of 82 years, received clinical pharmacy assessment for COVID‐19 therapy. Pharmacists recommended treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in 80% of patients. Medication modifications due to drug–drug interactions were required in 88% of patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Thirteen patients were recommended or opted to receive alternative COVID‐19 treatment while 36 patients declined COVID‐19 treatment, despite provider and pharmacist recommendations. Nineteen patients had an emergency department visit or hospitalization related to COVID‐19 within 30 days of pharmacy consult; 15 of the patients had been treated with COVID‐19 therapy and 4 declined therapy (p = 0.58). Eight patients experienced reinfection with COVID‐19. Only one patient reported an adverse event of hives within 30 days of receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy.ConclusionA pharmacist‐led consult service for evaluating and recommending COVID‐19 antiviral therapies resulted in successful triage, while balancing management of drug interactions in a high‐risk patient population. No significant difference was found in healthcare utilization or reinfection between patients who received a COVID‐19 therapy and those who did not.

Indirect impact of childhood 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in Canadian older adults: a Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) retrospective observational study

Background13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) has been part of publicly funded childhood immunisation programmes in Ontario and British Columbia (BC) since 2010. We assessed the indirect impact of infant PCV13...

Prepandemic Physical Activity and Risk of COVID-19 Diagnosis and Hospitalization in Older Adults

Higher prepandemic physical activity (PA) levels have been associated with lower risk and severity of COVID-19. To investigate the association between self-reported prepandemic PA levels and the risk and severity of COVID-19 in older US adults. This cohort study combined cohorts from 3 ongoing prospective randomized clinical trials of US adults aged 45 years or older who provided prepandemic self-reports of baseline leisure-time PA and risk factors for COVID-19 outcomes using the most recent questionnaire completed as of December 31, 2019, as the baseline PA assessment. In multiple surveys from May 2020 through May 2022, participants indicated whether they had at least 1 positive COVID-19 test result or were diagnosed with or hospitalized for COVID-19. Prepandemic PA, categorized into 3 groups by metabolic equivalent hours per week: inactive (0-3.5), insufficiently active (>3.5 to <7.5), and sufficiently active (≥7.5). Primary outcomes were risk of COVID-19 and hospitalization for COVID-19. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for the association of COVID-19 diagnosis and/or hospitalization with each of the 2 upper PA categories vs the lowest PA category. The pooled cohort included 61 557 participants (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.4] years; 70.7% female), 20.2% of whom were inactive; 11.4%, insufficiently active; and 68.5%, sufficiently active. A total of 5890 confirmed incident cases of COVID-19 were reported through May 2022, including 626 hospitalizations. After controlling for demographics, body mass index, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and medications used, compared with inactive individuals, those insufficiently active had no significant reduction in infection (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-1.06) or hospitalization (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76-1.28), whereas those sufficiently active had a significant reduction in infection (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97) and hospitalization (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90). In subgroup analyses, the association between PA and SARS-CoV-2 infection differed by sex, with only sufficiently active women having decreased odds (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95; P = .04 for interaction). In this cohort study of adults aged 45 years or older, those who adhered to PA guidelines before the pandemic had lower odds of developing or being hospitalized for COVID-19. Thus, higher prepandemic PA levels may be associated with reduced odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization for COVID-19.

1898 Feasibility study of a hospital deprescribing intervention: CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER)

Abstract Introduction CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) is a behaviour change intervention to support geriatricians and pharmacists to proactively deprescribe inappropriate medicines with older adults in hospital. The intervention comprises: formulating a deprescribing action plan, workshops, benchmarking reports and weekly briefings between geriatricians and pharmacists. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of the CHARMER intervention and study processes. Method A two-arm purposive allocation feasibility study was undertaken in four hospitals (three intervention, one control) in England in 2022. Data were collected to check completeness and quality, and assess intervention fidelity. Rapid qualitative analysis of staff and patient interviews, intervention implementation observations (action plan launch, pharmacist workshop and geriatrician videos), and study meeting minutes was undertaken. Results Study data were feasible to collect, of sufficient completeness and quality. Geriatrician and pharmacist principal investigators managed intervention implementation. They were able to implement most intervention components with ease and fidelity. Principal investigators felt that dedicated support for intervention implementation would better equip them with the resource and expertise to fidelitously implement all intervention components. Detailed instructions for preparing the action plan and how it might be delivered were desired. Geriatricians and pharmacists who received the intervention found it acceptable. Pharmacists felt that the weekly briefings encouraged them to dedicate time to review medicines and raise with geriatricians, opportunities to deprescribe. Geriatricians indicated that participating in CHARMER allowed them to focus on deprescribing conversations with patients and they involved junior doctors more in the deprescribing process. Conclusion(s) The CHARMER intervention and trial processes were feasible and acceptable. Revisions to support intervention implementation include providing a template action plan for hospitals to adapt; funds for a project manager one day a week to work with CHARMER principal investigators for three-months to oversee implementation, and support from Eastern Academic Health Science Network in the definitive trial (winter 2023).

Evaluation of strategies to support implementation of a hospital walking program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial

BackgroundSTRIDE is a supervised walking program designed to address the negative consequences of immobility during hospitalization for older adults. In an 8-hospital stepped wedge randomized controlled trial, STRIDE was associated with reduced odds of hospital discharge to skilled nursing facility. STRIDE has the potential to become a system-wide approach to address hospital-associated disability in Veteran’s Affairs; however, critical questions remain about how best to scale and sustain the program. The overall study goal is to compare the impact of two strategies on STRIDE program penetration (primary), fidelity, and adoption implementation outcomes.MethodsReplicating Effective Programs will be used as a framework underlying all implementation support activities. In a parallel, cluster randomized trial, we will use stratified blocked randomization to assign hospitals (n = 32) to either foundational support, comprised of standard, low-touch activities, or enhanced support, which includes the addition of tailored, high-touch activities if hospitals do not meet STRIDE program benchmarks at 6 and 8 months following start date. All hospitals begin with foundational support for 6 months until randomization occurs. The primary outcome is implementation penetration defined as the proportion of eligible hospitalizations with ≥ 1 STRIDE walks at 10 months. Secondary outcomes are fidelity and adoption with all implementation outcomes additionally examined at 13 and 16 months. Fidelity will be assessed for STRIDE hospitalizations as the percentage of eligible hospital days with “full dose” of the program, defined as two or more documented walks or one walk for more than 5 min. Program adoption is a binary outcome defined as ≥ 5 patients with a STRIDE walk or not. Analyses will also include patient-level effectiveness outcomes (e.g., discharge to nursing home, length of stay) and staffing and labor costs. We will employ a convergent mixed-methods approach to explore and understand pre-implementation contextual factors related to differences in hospital-level adoption.DiscussionOur study results will dually inform best practices for promoting successful implementation of an evidence-based hospital-based walking program. This information may support other programs by advancing our understanding of how to apply and scale-up national implementation strategies.Trial registrationThis study was registered on June 1, 2021, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04868656).

Meta-Analysis-Based Comparison of Annual Fall Risk between Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Falls are a primary cause of injuries and hospitalization in older adults. It has been reported that cognitive impairments and dementia can increase fall risk in the older population; however, it remains unknown if fall risk differs among subgroups of dementia. This meta-analysis summarized previous studies reporting the annual fall risk of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and compared the fall risk between these two groups of people with dementia. Thirty-five studies enrolling 7844 older adults with AD or MCI were included. The annual fall prevalence and average number of falls of the included studies were meta-analyzed and compared by random-effects models with inverse variance weights. The annual fall prevalence in people with AD (43.55%) was significantly higher than MCI (35.26%, p < 0.001). A χ2 test indicated that the pooled fall prevalence is significantly higher in people with AD than MCI χ2 = 158.403, p < 0.001). Additionally, the yearly average number of falls in AD was higher than in MCI (1.30 vs 0.77 falls/person). The results showed that older people with AD experience a higher annual fall prevalence with a larger number of falls than older adults with MCI. The results suggested that the fall risk measurements should be reported separately between people with AD and MCI. The findings could provide preliminary guidance for the identification of individuals with dementia who experience a high fall risk.

Serum Albumin as Prognostic Marker for Older Adults in Hospital and Community Settings.

Serum albumin, known for its multifaceted role in health, is hypothesized to serve as a prognostic marker for older adults, both in hospital and community settings. Nine studies were included in the review, revealing consistent associations between low serum albumin levels and increased mortality risk in hospitalized older individuals. In community settings, low serum albumin levels were linked to higher mortality rates compared to those with normal levels. The synthesis of evidence underscores the potential of serum albumin as a prognostic marker for older adults, offering valuable insights for risk stratification and targeted interventions. While robust evidence supports its utility in hospital settings, further research is warranted in community settings to address current limitations and enhance the applicability of serum albumin as a prognostic tool. This review merges existing knowledge of the prognostic significance of serum albumin in older adults across hospital and community settings. The findings emphasize the importance of serum albumin as a potential prognostic marker, urging continued research efforts to refine its application in diverse healthcare contexts and improve outcomes for the aging population.

Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in older adults during a hospital stay: A mixed‐methods systematic review

AbstractAimTo investigate barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in hospitalized older people.DesignA mixed‐methods systematic review. PROSPERO ID: CRD42020187932.Data SourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched (2007 to February 2023).Review MethodsIncluded studies focused on healthcare professionals' recognition and management of delirium for patients aged 65 years and over in a hospital ward or emergency department. Enhancing rigour, screening of results was conducted independently by two researchers. Qualitative and quantitative data were tabulated separately and grouped. Data were compared to identify similarities and differences. All studies were quality appraised.Results43 studies were included; 24 quantitative, 16 qualitative and three mixed‐methods. Data synthesis highlighted synergy between qualitative and quantitative findings. Barriers were reflected in six themes: (1) healthcare professionals' knowledge and understanding; (2) communication; (3) workforce development; (4) interprofessional working; (5) confounders; and (6) organizational constraints.ConclusionsOf significance, for older adults in hospital experiencing delirium, there is variability in whether and how well it is recognized and managed. To prevent adverse outcomes best practice guidance for screening, recognizing, diagnosing and managing delirium in older people needs to be agreed and disseminated widely. Supporting healthcare professionals to care for this patient population using an integrated approach is essential, how to involve and communicate with patients and their family and friends, how to recognize and manage delirium for patients with additional needs, e.g., those living with dementia and/or a learning disability. Hospitals need to have policy and guidance in place for the recognition and management of delirium in older adults presenting to a ward or to an emergency department. An IT infrastructure is needed that integrates assessments and care management plans in patient electronic records and makes them accessible within and across teams in hospital, primary and community care settings.Patient or Public ContributionThere was no patient or public contribution to this systematic review.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareHealthcare professionals can be better supported to be able to recognize and manage delirium during an acute hospital stay for older adults. This includes maximizing best care for those patients living with dementia, involving families and friends to help understand patients' baseline status and changes and supporting families and friends during this process. Of significance, attention to hospital IT infrastructures is warranted, integrating screening, assessment and care management plans in patients' electronic records and making these accessible to healthcare professionals caring for this patient population across care settings.ImpactWhat problem did the study address? Delirium is a common condition experienced by older hospitalized patients, but it is consistently under‐recognized which has implications for patient and organization outcomes. To help address this, understanding barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium for this patient population is paramount.What were the main findings? Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium for this patient population were synthesized in six themes: (1) healthcare professionals' knowledge and understanding, (2) communication; (3) workforce development; (4) interprofessional working; (5) confounders; and (6) organizational constraints.Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings of this original systematic review can contribute to hospital policy and protocol for the recognition and management of delirium in older patients. The findings can meaningfully contribute to workforce professional development for practitioners caring for older people during an acute hospital stay and for practitioners in primary and community settings involved in the follow‐up of patients post hospital discharge.For researchers, the findings indicate several research recommendations including investigating the impact of an education programme for nurses and other healthcare professionals on the recognition and management of the condition and understanding and investigating how best to support delirium‐related distress experienced by patients and their families and practitioners.Reporting MethodThis systematic review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (Page et al., 2021).

Complications and outcomes of hospitalizations for patients with and without Parkinson disease.

To examine complications and outcomes of hospitalizations for common indications for hospitalization among patients with Parkinson disease (PD). We identified and selected the ten most common indications for hospitalization among individuals ≥65 years of age using principal diagnoses from the California State Inpatient Database, 2018-2020. Patients with comorbid PD were identified using secondary diagnosis codes and matched one-to-one to patients without PD based on principal diagnosis (exact matching), age, gender, race and ethnicity, and Elixhauser comorbidity index (coarsened exact matching). We identified potentially preventable complications based on the absence of present on admission indicators among secondary diagnoses. In the matched cohort, we compared inpatient complications, early Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders (placed within 24 h of admission), use of life-sustaining therapies, new nursing facility requirement on discharge, and death or hospice discharge for patients with and without PD. We identified 35,457 patients with PD among the ten leading indications for hospitalization in older adults who were matched one-to-one to patients without PD (n = 70,914 in total). Comorbid PD was associated with an increased odds of developing aspiration pneumonia (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.02-1.35) and delirium (OR 1.11 95% CI 1.02-1.22) during admission. Patients with PD had greater odds of early DNR orders [placed within 24 h of admission] (OR 1.34 95% CI 1.29-1.39). While there was no difference in the odds of mechanical ventilation (OR 1.04 95% CI 0.98-1.11), patients with PD demonstrated greater odds of tracheostomy (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.12-1.77) and gastrostomy placement (OR 2.00 95% CI 1.82-2.20). PD was associated with greater odds of new nursing facility requirement upon discharge (OR 1.58 95% CI 1.53-1.64). Patients with PD were more likely to die as a result of their hospitalization (OR 1.11 95% CI 1.06-1.16). Patients with PD are at greater risk of developing aspiration pneumonia and delirium as a complication of their hospitalization. While patients with PD more often have early DNR orders, they have greater utilization of life-sustaining therapies and experience worse outcomes of their hospitalization including new nursing facility requirement upon discharge and greater mortality.

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of Smartphone Application Intended for Home Measurement of Gait Speed and Other Gait Dynamics in Older Adults with Blood Cancers

Introduction: Gait speed is a cardinal measure of mobility and frailty recommended to be assessed in all older adults with cancer (Dale, JCO, 2023). Four-meter gait speed (4MGS) is strongly predictive of mortality and hospitalization in older adults with hematologic malignancies (Liu, Blood, 2019). Remote monitoring technology can expand measurement of gait speed beyond the clinic (Clancy, JCO CCI, 2023), and smartphone applications (App) have been developed and validated to measure meaningful gait metrics via embedded internal motion sensors (Manor, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2018). However, the validity and reliability of a smartphone App for remotely measuring gait speed in older adults is not known, nor is the feasibility of using an App to measure longitudinal gait speed in older adults with blood cancers. Methods: We conducted two studies to (1) determine the validity and reliability of a smartphone App in measuring 4MGS in community-dwelling older adults, and (2) determine the feasibility of measuring 4MGS weekly for six weeks in older adults with multiple myeloma (MM) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). For the validity and reliability study, we enrolled adults aged ≥ 65 years living in an independent living housing facility. Each participant self-administered two supervised and three unsupervised gait assessments at home via the smartphone carried in their pocket, with the App providing multimedia instructions on how to complete the test. For each gait assessment, the participants walked back and forth along a 4-meter strip of ribbon for 45 seconds. For the first two supervised sessions, while the participants were self-administering the gait assessment, the study team concurrently captured their walking performance with a video camera (as a gold standard). For the following three unsupervised sessions, the participants administered the gait assessment App alone. We obtained the time for the first instance of walking along the 4-meter ribbon before turning and compared the gait speed (i.e. dividing 4 meters by the time) between the smartphone and the video capture. For the feasibility study, we enrolled patients age ≥73 years with either MDS or MM cared for at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Patients self-administered the gait assessment described above alone at home once a day for six weeks after a dedicated teaching session with study staff. We reported completion rates and participants' feedback regarding acceptability. Results: 14 older adults (77.2±6.3, 13 females) completed the validity and reliability study. The smartphone 4MGS demonstrated strong criterion validity yielding a high correlation with the camera 4MGS ( Figure 1) along with high reliability as demonstrated by high internal consistency and low measurement error ( Figure 2). The smartphone 4MGS also showed good test-retest reliability over three unsupervised sessions (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.78). In the feasibility study, 12 patients (79.3±3.14, 4 females, 50% MDS, 42% MM, and 8% both) were enrolled out of 19 contacted for recruitment (63%). To date, nine have completed the study: 9/9 completed at least one 4MGS test, 8/9 (89%) completed at least three weeks, and 3/9 (33%) completed all six weeks. When asked, “How important is measuring your function and mobility to you?” on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high), 7/9 participants answered 4 or 5. When asked to rate their experience completing the walking tests on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good), 6/9 participants answered 4 or 5. When asked the degree to which one agrees with the statement, “I feel that the walking tests are too burdensome,” on scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), 9/9 patients answered 1 or 2. Conclusions: The App was both valid and reliable in measuring 4MGS in older adults' homes. User acceptance was also high, and the app was rated as minimally burdensome by patients with blood cancers with the majority completing at least three weekly home 4MGS tests. Our findings support using existing smartphone technology to assess a key measure of mobility and frailty in the homes of older adults with blood cancers, allowing for more frequent longitudinal assessment of how blood cancers and their treatments impact older adult mobility and frailty.

2650. Characteristics of In-Hospital Care and Immediate Post-Discharge Care Status among Older Adults Hospitalized with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, Seasonal Influenza, Acute Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke in the US

Abstract Background Despite increased recognition of the morbidity, mortality, and economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults, few studies have documented the status of post-discharge care after RSV hospitalization. This study assessed in-hospital and immediate post-discharge care status in older adults hospitalized with RSV in the US and compared it with other serious medical conditions (influenza, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and stroke) that have long-standing disease prevention efforts. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from Premier Healthcare Database between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Adults aged ≥ 65 years hospitalized due to primary diagnosis of RSV, influenza, AMI, or stroke were included. Discharge statuses were used to categorize the levels of immediate post-discharge care as shown in Figure 1. Descriptive statistics and Sankey diagrams were used to summarize the four cohorts. Results Overall, 2,559 RSV, 174,826 influenza, 208,448 AMI, and 274,102 stroke hospitalizations were identified with similar mean patient ages of 79.8, 76.8, 76.3, and 78.0 years, respectively. Almost all patients ( &amp;gt; 90%) had underlying comorbidities. The mean inpatient length of stay (LOS) was similar in the four cohorts (4.0, 4.4, 3.7, and 4.1 days, respectively), but the prevalence of mechanical ventilator use varied, i.e., 0.4%, 13.7%, 5.9%, and 1.4%, respectively. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions during RSV hospitalizations were infrequent (3.0%) as compared to influenza (16.8%), AMI (24.5%), and stroke (20.5%). The mean ICU LOS for these four cohorts were 2.3, 2.8, 1.7, and 1.7 days in the same order. Immediately following discharge, moderate care was required for 23.9%, 22.9%, 14.1%, and 17.5% of RSV, influenza, AMI, and stroke hospitalizations, respectively. Elevated care was considerably more frequent for stroke hospitalizations (48.1%) than RSV (18.8%), influenza (21.4%), and AMI (19.3%) hospitalizations (Figure 2). Conclusion Older adults discharged from RSV hospitalizations require considerable care with needs comparable to influenza and AMI discharges. Given the substantial care requirements of RSV hospitalizations in older adults, focus on disease prevention efforts for RSV are needed. Disclosures Reiko Sato, PhD, Pfizer Inc: employee|Pfizer Inc: Stocks/Bonds Jennifer Judy, MS, PhD, Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Kari Yacisin, M.D., Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Elizabeth Begier, M.D., M.P.H., Pfizer: EB is an employee of Pfizer, the sponsor of this study|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Poorva Sardana, MSc, Pfizer Inc: Contracted Research Neha Agrawal, MA, Pfizer Inc: Contracted Research Anchita Goswami, MSc, Pfizer Inc: Contracted Research Manvi Sharma, RPh, MBA, PhD, Pfizer Inc: Contracted Research

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Pre-pandemic Among Adults Hospitalized With Congestive Heart Failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Older Adults.

Data are limited on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the prevention of influenza-related hospitalizations in older adults and those with underlying high-risk comorbidities. We conducted a prospective, test-negative, case-control study at 2 US hospitals from October 2018-March 2020 among adults aged ≥50 years hospitalized with acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) and adults ≥18 years admitted with congestive heart failure (CHF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Adults were eligible if they resided in 1 of 8 counties in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were tested using BioFire FilmArray (bioMérieux, Inc.) respiratory panel, and standard-of-care molecular results were included when available. Influenza vaccination history was determined from the Georgia vaccine registry and medical records. We used multivariable logistic regression to control for potential confounders and to determine 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 3090 eligible adults, 1562 (50.6%) were enrolled. Of the 1515 with influenza vaccination history available, 701 (46.2%) had received vaccination during that season. Influenza was identified in 37 (5.3%) vaccinated versus 78 (9.6%) unvaccinated participants. After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, immunosuppression, month, and season, pooled VE for any influenza-related hospitalization in the eligible study population was 63.1% (95% CI, 43.8-75.8%). Adjusted VE against influenza-related hospitalization for ARI in adults ≥50 years was 55.9% (29.9-72.3%) and adjusted VE against influenza-related CHF/COPD exacerbation in adults ≥18 years was 80.3% (36.3-93.9%). Influenza vaccination was effective in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations in adults aged ≥50 years and those with CHF/COPD exacerbations during the 2018-2020 seasons.

Delirium Due to Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations Among Older Adults.

Delirium is a common complication during acute care hospitalizations in older adults. A substantial percentage of admissions are for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) or potentially avoidable hospitalizations-conditions that might be treated early in the outpatient setting to prevent hospitalization and hospital complications. This retrospective cross-sectional study examined rates of delirium among older adults hospitalized for ACSCs. Participants were 39 933 older adults ≥65 years of age admitted from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 to general inpatient units and ICUs of a large Southeastern academic medical center. Delirium was defined as a score ≥ 2 on the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale or positive on the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit during admission, and ACSCs were identified from the primary admission diagnosis using standardized definitions. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the association between ACSCs and delirium, compared with admissions for non-ACSC diagnoses, adjusting for covariates and repeated observations for individuals with multiple admissions. Delirium occurred in 15.6% of admissions for older adults. Rates were lower for ACSC admissions versus admissions for other conditions (13.9% vs 15.8%, p < .001). Older age and higher comorbidity were significant predictors of the development of delirium. Rates of delirium among older adults hospitalized for ACSCs were lower than rates for non-ACSC hospitalization but still substantial. Optimizing the treatment of ACSCs in the outpatient setting is an important goal not only for reducing hospitalizations but also for reducing risks for hospital-associated complications such as delirium.

Seeing the forest (plot) for the trees-the importance of evidence synthesis in older adult care.

Systematically reviewing all the available evidence and then creating summary analyses of the pooled data is the foundation of evidence-based practice. Indeed, this evidence synthesis approach informs much of the care of older adults in hospital and community. It is perhaps no surprise that the journal Age and Ageing is a frequent platform for publishing research papers based on systematic review and synthesis. This research has evolved substantially from the early days of evidence-based medicine and the Cochrane Collaboration. The traditional approach would be a quantitative summary, calculated using pair-wise meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of drug versus placebo, or a synthesis of observational studies to create summaries of prevalence, associations and outcomes. Methods have evolved and newer techniques such as scoping reviews, test accuracy meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis are all now available. The sophistication of these methods is driven in part by the increasingly complex decisions that need be made in contemporary older adult care. Age and Ageing continues to champion established and novel evidence synthesis approaches, and in the accompanying Collection exemplars of these differing methods are presented and described. Whilst there is marked heterogeneity in the techniques used, the consistent and defining feature of all these papers is the desire to comprehensively, and critically summarise the evidence in order to answer the most pertinent questions regarding older adult care.

Revising and evaluating falls prevention education for older adults in hospital

Objective: Partnering with patients and staff to develop and evaluate falls prevention education could better enable patient learning and engagement. This study aimed to create a revised version of the Safe Recovery falls prevention education programme in partnership with older patients and hospital staff, to improve patient engagement in undertaking falls preventive strategies in hospital. Design: Two-phase sequential mixed methods participatory design. Setting: Hospital rehabilitation wards in Western Australia. Method: Phase 1: older patients ( n = 10) and staff ( n = 10) were surveyed before and after original programme delivery to ascertain their reaction and learning. Consumer-focused discussions were undertaken with staff and patients online to inform programme revision. A patient video and workbook were co-produced, and staff were trained to deliver the revised programme. Phase 2: older patients ( n = 10) and staff ( n = 10) were surveyed before and after receiving the revised programme to gain reactions and learning. Deductive content analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyse the qualitative and quantitative data. Results: Patients and staff perceived the original programme to be outdated and expressed low levels of satisfaction with the original resources. In contrast, both patients and staff were highly satisfied with the revised programme. Both original and revised Safe Recovery programme patient groups demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge and awareness to reduce their risk of falling after receiving the education ( p = .008, p = .005, respectively). However, patients receiving the revised programme were significantly more likely to intend to take action ( p = .024) and have a clear action plan ( p = .010). Staff perceived that the revised resources showed significant improvements in aesthetic appeal ( p = .007) and ability to engage patients in learning ( p = .007). Conclusion: Patients and staff contributed to successfully revising the Safe Recovery programme with positive reactions to the co-produced resources. Participating in falls education significantly improved older patients’ knowledge and attitudes regarding falls prevention.