Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients Research Articles

Beyond Clinical Trials – The cost-saving associated with dapagliflozin use in portuguese hospital clinical practice

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Dapagliflozin has proven efficacy in reducing the risk of death and hospitalization in HF patients, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This paper aimed to project the potential impact of dapagliflozin on healthcare costs related to HF subsequent hospitalizations (HFHs) in Portuguese hospitals. The total number of HF-related hospitalizations (hHF), HFHs, and the average length of stay for patients with a primary diagnosis of HF from six Portuguese hospitals, between January 2019 and December 2021, were collected and aggregated by hospital classification. Costs associated with HFHs were calculated according to Portuguese legislation and considering conservative, average, and complex approaches. Cost-saving projections were based on extrapolations from hHF risk reductions reported in dapagliflozin clinical trials. Considering a 26% risk reduction in hHF reported on pooled-analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER as the expected reduction in HFHs, the use of dapagliflozin would be associated with cost savings ranging from EUR 1 612 851.54 up to EUR 6 587 360.09, when considering all hospitals and the different approaches, between 2019 and 2021. A similar projection is observed based on 24% RRR derived by weighting DAPA-HF and DELIVER sub-analyses and PORTHOS epidemiological data. In this projection, dapagliflozin use in all eligible hHF patients is associated with a significant reduction in direct costs. Our data support that, in addition to the improvements in HF-related outcomes, dapagliflozin may have a significant economic impact on healthcare costs in Portuguese hospitals.

CARDIOPROTECTIVE PROPERTIES OF SGLT2-INHIBITORS

Due to its high mortality rate, heart failure (HF) presents a substantial worldwide health burden that calls for efficient treatment approaches. Inhibitors of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) have become essential treatments for heart failure in all left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) levels. Their processes, which include enhanced metabolic efficiency and ventricular loading circumstances, present encouraging results. The effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, in lowering cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in heart failure patients with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction has been shown in several clinical trials, including DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-Reduced, EMPEROR-Preserved, and DELIVER. These results represent a revolutionary development in the treatment of HF, emphasizing the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in comprehensive treatments, regardless of renal function or diabetes state.

Sex differences in clinical characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in Asian hospitalized heart failure patients.

Sex differences in long-term post-discharge clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (HF) persist despite the world-wide implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy for decades. The present study aims to elucidate the puzzling dilemma and to depict the directions of solution. Between 2011 and 2020, a total of 12428 patients (6518 men and 5910 women, mean age 73.50±14.85) hospitalized for acute decompensated HF were retrospectively enrolled from a university HF cohort. Compared with men, women hospitalized for acute decompensated HF were older in age (76.40±13.43 vs. 71.20±15.67years old, P<0.0001) with more coexisting hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, but less with ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P<0.0001). In echocardiography measurement parameters, women had smaller left ventricular and left atrial dimensions, higher left ventricular mass index, higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and more in HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) category (LVEF>50%) than men (P<0.0001). In HF therapy, women compared with men received more guideline-directed medical HF therapies including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, but similar beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (P<0.0001). Post-discharge long-term clinical outcomes after multivariate-adjusted analysis revealed that women compared with men had lower all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-0.93], lower cardiovascular mortality (aHR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99) and lower 1year mortality (aHR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99) but similar HF rehospitalization rate (aHR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.95-1.09) over 8years of follow-up. The superiority of women over men in all-cause mortality was shown in HF with preserved EF (>50%) and HF with mildly reduced EF (40%-50%), but not in HF with reduced EF (<40%) category. Subgroup forest plot analysis showed body mass index, coexisting hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as significant interacting factors. With more coronary risk factors and medical comorbidities, less cardiac remodelling and better adherence to guideline-directed HF therapy, women hospitalized for acute decompensated HF demonstrated superiority over men in long-term post-discharge clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and 1year mortality, and mainly in HF with preserved and mid-range EF categories, in the Asian HF cohort.

The effect of bachmann bundle pacing on diastolic function in patients with non-obstructive HCM

Abstract Background and Objective Patients with non-obstructive HCM (nHCM) have advanced diastolic dysfunction and atrial remodeling, leading to increased heart failure hospitalisations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) in diastolic filling compared to right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP). Methods Forty patients with symptomatic nHCM and normal LV function were prospectively enrolled from January 2021 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included electrocardiographic evidence of inter-atrial delay, E/e’ &amp;gt; 15, and an indication for ICD implantation. BBP was attempted in twenty patients, others underwent RAAP. A Biotronik Selectra 3D 40-S sheath was used for BBP in patients in whom initial lead implantation was unsuccessful. BBP was defined based on P-wave morphology and fluoroscopic lead position. The RV lead was implanted in the RV apex in all patients and the AV delay was optimized based on diastolic filling period and E/e’. Devices were programmed in DDD mode. During follow up, diastolic function, functional capacity, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure hospitalisations were assessed in both groups. Results Among the forty patients (age 48.2+7.8 yrs, males 75%, ESC-SCD Risk 4.3+0.6%), the baseline P wave duration, E/A, E/e’ were 138.4+16.4 ms, 2.5+0.5, and 17.5+2.4, respectively. Six patients (15%) had a history of paroxysmal AF (3 each in BBP and RAAP groups). Of the 16 patients (80%) who underwent successful BBP, the Selectra 3D 40-S sheath was used in 8 patients (Figure 1, Panel A). During BBP, a bachmann bundle potential was recorded in 7 of 16 patients (43.8%) (Figure 1, Panel C). The pacing threshold (1.5+0.5@0.4ms vs. 0.9+0.3@0.4ms, p=0.026) was higher and the atrial sensing (1.8+0.4 vs. 3.3+0.6, p=0.002) was lower in the BBP group compared to the RAAP group at 4 weeks and 6 months of follow up. There was an acute rise in threshold (2.1@0.4 ms) in 1 BBP patient at 4 weeks of follow up. Patients in the BBP group had a reduction in P wave duration compared to the patients in the RAAP group (-22.5 + 5.4 vs. +5.6 + 3.2 ms, p&amp;lt;0.001). During follow up (11.4 + 3.4 months), there was a significant improvement in diastolic function (E/e’), functional capacity (NYHA Class) and reduction in NT-proBNP in the BBB group compared to the RAAP group (Figure 1). The percentage of atrial pacing was similar in both groups (BBP 73.2 + 7.8 vs. RAAP 78.5 + 9.1 %, p=0.219). The risk of atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (12.5% vs. 35.0%, p=0.022) and heart failure hospitalisations (6.3% vs. 20%, p=0.042) was lower in the BBP group compared with RAAP during follow up. Conclusions BBP is safe and effective in improving diastolic function, functional capacity and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with nHCM.BBP Pacing using Selectra 3D 40-S SheathChange in E/e', NYHA, and NT-pro BNP

Cardiovascular outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCancer patients with diabetes are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases due to common risk factors and well-documented drug-associated cardiotoxicity. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with diabetes, but their effects on cancer patients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with concomitant diabetes and cancer.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing cardiovascular outcomes between cancer patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2 inhibitors and those not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 29, 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were heart failure hospitalization, and adverse events. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity and explore the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on mitigating cardiotoxicity.ResultsNine cohort studies involving 82,654 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68, P < 0.0001; I2 = 98%) and heart failure hospitalization (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.81, P = 0.006; I2 = 21%) compared to non-use. The mortality benefit remained significant in patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28–0.89, P = 0.02; I2 = 71%). SGLT2 inhibitor use was also associated with a lower risk of sepsis (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.44, P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and no increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.20–2.16, P = 0.49; I2 = 0%).ConclusionsSGLT2 inhibitor therapy is associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with concomitant diabetes and cancer. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may offer cardiovascular benefits in this high-risk population. Randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings and evaluate the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in specific cancer types and treatment regimens.

Validation of Hospital Frailty Risk Score in Heart Failure

Background: Frailty is prevalent in older people and results from age-related decline in physiological function and reserve. The objective of this study was to validate the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) in predicting outcomes and hospitalisation usage in older hospitalised heart failure (HF) patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of electronic medical records. Patients aged ≥65 years admitted with HF to a Singapore tertiary hospital between 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2021 were included. Patients were identified as HF patients in the value-driven care pathway and using ICD codes for HF. They were categorised into low risk (&lt;5), intermediate risk (5–15) and high risk (&gt;15) of frailty using the HFRS. Results: A total of 208 older patients with HF were included (mean age 79.4 years; 50.5% males). Using the HFRS, 35.1% were deemed at low risk, 46.2% at intermediate risk and 18.8% at high risk of frailty. Those at high risk of frailty were older than those at low risk (mean age 84.8 versus 76.5 years, respectively; p&lt;0.001). Women had a higher risk of frailty than men. Univariate analyses showed longer length of stay (LOS) and higher 30-, 90- and 365-day mortality in those at high frailty risk. In multivariate analyses, HFRS was associated with long LOS, 90-day and 1-year mortality. Dementia, acute MI and renal disease were more common in high-risk patients. Comparing HFRS with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), HFRS was a better predictor of long LOS, mortality at 30, 90, 1 year and 30-day readmission than CCI. HFRS alone was a better predictor than combining the HFRS and CCI. Conclusion: Older patients with higher HFRS have increased healthcare utilisation, including longer LOS and higher mortality.

The Relationship Between Immune Inflammation Index and Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Aim: We aimed to investigate whether systemic immune inflammation index (SII) has a predictive value in predicting prognosis and major adverse cardiovascular events such as exitus, stroke and hospitalization in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Patients over the age of 18 who applied to the cardiology and emergency outpatient clinics between January 2019 and January 2022 and diagnosed with HFrEF (Ejection Fraction

Critical re-evaluation of the identification of iron deficiency states and effective iron repletion strategies in patients with chronic heart failure.

According to current guidelines, iron deficiency is defined by a serum ferritin level <100 ng/ml or a transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% if the serum ferritin level is 100-299 μg/L. These criteria were developed to encourage the use of intravenous iron as an adjunct to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of renal anaemia. However, in patients with heart failure, these criteria are not supported by any pathophysiological or clinical evidence that they identify an absolute or functional iron deficiency state. A low baseline TSAT-but not serum ferritin level-appears to be a reliable indicator of the effect of intravenous iron to reduce major heart failure events. In randomized controlled trials, intravenous iron decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or total heart failure hospitalization in patients with a TSAT <20% (risk ratio 0.67 [0.49-0.92]) but not in patients with a TSAT ≥20% (risk ratio 0.99 [0.74-1.30]), with the magnitude of the risk reduction being proportional to the severity of hypoferraemia. Patients who were enrolled in clinical trials solely because they had a serum ferritin level <100 μg/L showed no significant benefit on heart failure outcomes, and it is noteworthy that serum ferritin levels of 20-300 μg/L lie entirely within the range of normal values for healthy adults. Current guidelines reflect the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, which inadvertently adopted unvalidated criteria to define iron deficiency. Reliance on these guidelines would lead to the treatment of many patients who are not iron deficient (serum ferritin level <100 μg/L but normal TSAT) and ignores the possibility of iron deficiency in patients with a low TSAT but with serum ferritin level of >300 μg/L. Importantly, analyses of benefit based on trial eligibility-driven guidelines substantially underestimate the magnitude of heart-failure-event risk reduction with intravenous iron in patients who are truly iron deficient. Based on all available data, we recommend a new mechanism-based and trial-tested approach that reflects the totality of evidence more faithfully than the historical process adopted by clinical investigators and by the guidelines. Until additional evidence is forthcoming, an iron deficiency state in patients with heart failure should be defined by a TSAT <20% (as long as the serum ferritin level is <400 μg/L), and furthermore, the use of a serum ferritin level <100 μg/L alone as a diagnostic criterion should be discarded.

Galectin-3 levels and long-term all-cause mortality and hospitalization in heart failure patients: a meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis investigated the dose-response relationship between circulating galectin-3 levels and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). PubMed and Embase were screened for studies on galectin-3 and HF. The outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality (ACM), and all-cause mortality or HF-related rehospitalization (ACM/HFR), with a follow-up time of more than 6months. For categorical variables, comparisons between groups with the highest and lowest galectin-3 levels were pooled. For continuous variables, the risks of ACM and ACM/HFR increase per 1-standard deviation (SD) and 1-unit after logarithmic transformation galectin-3 levels were pooled. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled results, and all pooled results were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Besides, a dose-response analysis was performed. Twenty-four cohort studies were included. In HF patients, higher circulating galectin-3 levels were significantly associated with a higher risk of long-term ACM (HR, 1.65; 95% CI 1.28-2.13; I2=66%), and 1ng/mL increase in galectin-3 was associated with a 4% (HR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.06; P=0.002) increase in hazard. Similarly, higher circulating galectin-3 levels were significantly associated with a higher risk of long-term ACM/HFR (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.00; I2=76%), and 1ng/mL increase in galectin-3 was associated with a 3% (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04; P<0.001) increase in hazard. An increase of 1-SD in galectin-3units was associated with a 29% increased hazard of long-term ACM (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.13-1.48; I2=42%) and a 22% increased hazard of ACM/HFR (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.07-1.38; I2=60%). Similarly, an increase of 1-log in galectin-3units was associated with a 98% higher hazard of long-term ACM (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.48-2.65; I2=41%) and an 83% higher hazard of ACM/HFR in HF patients (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.02-3.28; I2=7%). Correlation analysis showed a moderate positive correlation between baseline galectin-3 and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide levels (r=0.48, P=0.045) and a weak negative correlation with eGFR (r=-0.39, P=0.077). Higher circulating galectin-3 levels after hospitalization of HF patients are linearly and positively associated with the risk of long-term ACM and ACM/HFR.

In Cardiac Myocytes the SGLT2 Inhibitor Ertugliflozin Attenuates Cytosolic Ca2+ Peaks After Adrenergic Stimulation

A novel class of antidiabetic drugs, called gliflozins, inhibit sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2i) to lower blood glucose levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Gliflozins reduce mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in HF patients with or without T2DM, but the molecular mechanisms are unclear. We hypothesize that modulating effects on cardiac calcium homeostasis are involved in SGLT2i-induced benefits during HF, and that the SGLT2i ertugliflozin (ERTU) will alter cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) in contracting cardiomyocytes after adrenergic stimulation. Cardiomyocytes were isolated from 0–2-day old C57BL/6J mice, treated for 72 hours with either ERTU (100 nM, and 1 μM), the NHE-1 inhibitor cariporide (CARI, 10 μM), ERTU and CARI, or vehicle (Ctrl). After 72 hours, cells were either A) loaded with Fura-2, baseline cytosolic calcium levels ([Ca2+]cyt) recorded, cells stimulated with phenylephrine (PE, 100 μM), and [Ca2+]cyt recorded for additional 30 minutes, B) lysed and protein isolated for analysis by immunoblotting, or C) fixed for immunohistochemical assessment. Results: 100 nM and 1 uM ERTU reduced [Ca2+]cyt peaks after PE, but 100 nM ERTU to a lesser degree. In contrast, 72-hour-long NHE1 inhibition with CARI increased [Ca2+]cyt at baseline when compared to vehicle and ERTU, and further enhanced [Ca2+]cyt peaks after PE. Immunoblotting revealed increased protein levels of S16 phosphorylated phospholamban, decreased total phospholamban, and upregulated sarcomeric α-actinin post-ERTU. Immunohistochemical assessment of sarcomeric α-actinin localization revealed improved sarcomeric Z-line organization after ERTU administration. Sustained exposure to the SGLT2i ERTU reduced, but the NHE-1 inhibitor CARI increased [Ca2+]cyt in contracting cardiac myocytes. These data indicate that ERTU’s beneficial effect on [Ca2+]cyt homeostasis is independent of NHE1 inhibition. Since disturbed calcium handling and calcium overload are hallmarks of HF, reduced [Ca2+]cyt levels after sympathetic stimulation may contribute to the cardioprotective effect of SGLT2i. Further studies are needed to unravel the molecular mechanisms behind ERTU’s influence on cardiac calcium homeostasis. This study was funded by Merck &amp; Co., Inc. (Kenilworth, NJ). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Cardiovascular and mortality benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists as third-step glucose-lowering medicine in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort analysis

IntroductionStudies have found that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1) have cardiovascular benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease...

Predictive value of quality of life as measured by KCCQ in heart failure patients: A meta-analysis.

Studies on the predictive ability of disease-specific health quality of life (QoL) in patients with heart failure (HF) have produced conflicting results. To address these gaps in knowledge, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of QoL measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in patients with HF. We searched PubMed, and Embase databases to identify studies investigating the predictive utility of baseline QoL measured by the KCCQ in HF patients. The outcome measures were all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation. The predictive value of QoL was expressed by pooling the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the bottom versus the top category of KCCQ score or for per 10-point KCCQ score decrease. Twelve studies reporting on 11 articles with a total of 34,927 HF patients were identified. Comparison of the bottom with the top KCCQ score, the pooled adjusted HR was 2.34 (95% CI 2.10-2.60) and 2.53 (95% CI 2.23-2.88) for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation, respectively. Additionally, a 10-point decrease in KCCQ score was associated with a 12% (95% CI 7%-16%) increased risk of all-cause mortality and a 14% (95% CI 13%-15%) increased risk of HF hospitalisation. Poor health-related QoL as determined by the lower KCCQ score, was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation in patients with HF. Measuring disease-specific health-related QoL using the KCCQ score may provide valuable predictive information for HF patients.

Role of NT-proBNP and lung ultrasound in diagnosing and classifying heart failure in a hospitalized oldest-old population: a cross-sectional study.

Diagnosing and classifying heart failure (HF) in the oldest-old patients has technical and interpretation issues, especially in the acute setting. We assessed the usefulness of both N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and lung ultrasound (LUS) for confirming HF diagnosis and predicting, among hospitalized HF patients, those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We performed a cross-sectional study on 148 consecutive patients aged ≥ 80 years admitted to our Internal Medicine and Geriatrics ward with at least one symptom/sign compatible with HF and NT-proBNP ≥ 125 pg/mL. We measured serum NT-proBNP levels and performed LUS and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on admission before diuretic therapy. We divided our cohort into three subgroups according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced (LVEF ≤ 40%), mildly-reduced (LVEF = 41-49%) and preserved (LVEF ≥ 50%). The mean age was 88±5 years. Male prevalence was 42%. Patients with HFrEF were 19%. Clinical features and laboratory parameters did not differ between the three subgroups, except for higher NT-proBNP in HFrEF patients, which also had a higher number of total B-lines and intercostal spaces of pleural effusion at LUS. Overall, NT-proBNP showed an inverse correlation with LVEF (r = -0.22, p = 0.007) and a direct correlation with age, total pulmonary B-lines, and intercostal spaces of pleural effusion. According to the ROCs, NT-proBNP levels, pulmonary B-lines and pleural effusion extension were poorly predictive for HFrEF. The best-performing cut-offs were 9531 pg/mL for NT-proBNP (SP 0.70, SE 0.50), 13 for total B-lines (SP 0.69, SE 0.85) and one intercostal space for pleural effusion (SP 0.55, SE 0.89). Patients with admission NT-proBNP ≥ 9531 pg/mL had a 2-fold higher risk for HFrEF (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.9), while we did not find any association for total B-lines ≥ 13 or pleural effusion ≥ 1 intercostal space with HFrEF. A significant association with HFrEF emerged for the combination of NT-proBNP ≥ 9531 pg/mL, total B-lines ≥ 13 and intercostal spaces of pleural effusion ≥ 1 (adjusted OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.5-12.9). Although NT-proBNP and LUS help diagnose HF, their accuracy in discriminating HFrEF from non-HFrEF was poor in our real-life clinical study on oldest-old hospitalized patients, making the use of TTE still necessary to distinguish HF phenotypes in this peculiar setting. These data require confirmation in more extensive and longer prospective studies.

Predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with a diagnosis of heart failure: a machine learning approach.

Existing risk prediction models for hospitalized heart failure patients are limited. We identified patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure between 7 May 2013 and 26 April 2022 from a large academic, quaternary care medical centre (training cohort). Demographics, medical comorbidities, vitals, and labs were collected and were used to construct random forest machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality. Models were compared with logistic regression, and to commonly used heart failure risk scores. The models were subsequently validated in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure from a second academic, community medical centre (validation cohort). The entire cohort comprised 21802 patients, of which 14539 were in the training cohort and 7263 were in the validation cohort. The median age (25th-75th percentile) was 70 (58-82) for the entire cohort, 43.2% were female, and 6.7% experienced inpatient mortality. In the overall cohort, 7621 (35.0%) patients had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF≤40%), 1271 (5.8%) had heart failure with mildly reduced EF (EF 41-49%), and 12910 (59.2%) had heart failure with preserved EF (EF≥50%). Random forest models in the validation cohort demonstrated a c-statistic (95% confidence interval) of 0.96 (0.95-0.97), sensitivity (SN) of 87.3%, and specificity (SP) of 90.6% for the prediction of in-hospital mortality. Models for those with HFrEF demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.96 (0.94-0.98), SN 88.2%, and SP 91.0%, and those for patients with HFpEF showed a c-statistic of 0.95 (0.93-0.97), SN 87.4%, and SP 89.5% for predicting in-hospital mortality. The random forest model significantly outperformed logistic regression (c-statistic 0.87, SN 75.9%, and SP 86.9%), and current existing risk scores including the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry risk score (c-statistic of 0.70, SN 69%, and SP 62%), and the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure risk score (c-statistic 0.69, SN 67%, and SP 63%); P<0.001 for comparison. Machine learning models built from commonly recorded patient information can accurately predict in-hospital mortality among patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure.

Door-to-Diuretic Time and Short-Term Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a leading cause of unplanned hospitalization often associated with poor outcomes. Decongestion with intravenous loop diuretics is the mainstay of treatment. Metrics such as door-to-diuretic time, the time between presentation of AHF to the hospital and administration of intravenous diuretics, may play an important role in faster decongestion and thereby reduce mortality. We sought to investigate whether early diuretic administration (door-to-diuretic [D2D] time 60≤mins) was associated with improved outcomes among hospitalized HF patients. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed from inception until June, 2023. The primary endpoints were all cause in hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and heart failure readmission. We used a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous data. Our meta-analysis included 6 observational studies involving 19,916 patients. No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed between shorter D2D and delayed D2D time with respect to in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35-1.09), 30-day mortality (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.51-1.33; P=0.44), length of hospital stay (MD: -0.02; 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.22) and HF readmission (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.86-1.20). Evidence from existing literature, which is largely limited to observational comparisons, highlights comparable outcomes between the two treatment strategies. Early diuretic administration, particularly within 60 minutes of hospital presentation, does not demonstrate any prognostic benefits.

Treatment effects of empagliflozin in hospitalized heart failure patients across the range of left ventricular ejection fraction-Results from the EMPULSE trial.

The EMPULSE (EMPagliflozin in patients hospitalised with acUte heart faiLure who have been StabilizEd) trial showed that, compared to placebo, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin (10 mg/day) improved clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF). We investigated whether efficacy and safety of empagliflozin were consistent across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A total of 530 patients hospitalized for acute de novo or decompensated HF were included irrespective of LVEF. For the present analysis, patients were classified as HF with reduced (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF, LVEF 41-49%) or preserved (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%) ejection fraction at baseline. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical outcome of death, worsening HF events (HFE) and quality of life over 90 days, assessed by the win ratio. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint and safety. Out of 523 patients with baseline data, 354 (67.7%) had HFrEF, 54 (10.3%) had HFmrEF and 115 (22.0%) had HFpEF. The clinical benefit (hierarchical composite of all-cause death, HFE and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score) of empagliflozin at 90 days compared to placebo was consistent across LVEF categories (≤40%: win ratio 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.04, 1.75]; 41-49%: win ratio 1.25 [0.66, 2.37)] and ≥50%: win ratio 1.40 [0.87, 2.23], pinteraction = 0.96) with a favourable safety profile. Results were consistent across individual components of the hierarchical primary endpoint. The clinical benefit of empagliflozin proved consistent across LVEF categories in the EMPULSE trial. These results support early in-hospital initiation of empagliflozin regardless of LVEF.

(1395) - Evaluation of the Impact of Pharmacist Transitions of Care Interventions in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients

(1395) - Evaluation of the Impact of Pharmacist Transitions of Care Interventions in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients

Understanding The Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction for Type 2 Diabetes Patients-A Literature Review

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and heart failure. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a novel class of antidiabetic agents with potential cardiovascular benefits. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on reducing cardiovascular events and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with T2DM. Aims: The review aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on reducing cardiovascular events, including MACE, and HF hospitalizations in patients with T2DM. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in major electronic databases like PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct to identify relevant studies. Studies investigating the cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM patients were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by three reviewers using predefined criteria. Results: A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The analysis of clinical trials, including EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS Program, and DECLARE-TIMI 58, demonstrated significant reductions in MACE and HF hospitalizations with SGLT2 inhibitors compared to placebo or standard care. Real-world evidence from studies such as the CVD-REAL and EASEL studies further supported these findings, showing consistent cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in routine clinical practice. The findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality, as well as a decreased risk of heart failure hospitalizations in patients with T2DM. Conclusion: This systematic review provides evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM management. The findings underscore the importance of considering these agents as part of comprehensive cardiovascular risk reduction strategies in T2DM patients. Further research is necessary to explicate the mechanisms underlying these benefits and optimize their clinical use.

Impact of heart rate changes during hospitalization on outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The benefits of lowering heart rate (HR) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients are still a matter of debate. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between changes in HR during hospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause death in hospitalized HFpEF patients. Hospitalized HF patients between January 2017 and December 2021 were consecutively enrolled in a national, multicentred, and prospective registry database, the China Cardiovascular Association Database-HF Center Registry. HF patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥50% were defined as HFpEF patients. The study analysed admission/discharge HR, change in HR during hospitalization (∆HR), and ∆HR ratio (∆HR/admission HR). The patients were categorized into three groups: no HR dropping group (ΔHR ratio>0.0%), moderate HR dropping group (-15%<ΔHR ratio≤0.0%), and excessive HR dropping group (ΔHR ratio≤-15%). All patients were followed up for 12months. The primary endpoint was CV events (CV death or HF rehospitalization). The secondary endpoint was all-cause death. A total of 19510 HFpEF patients (9750 males, mean age 71.9±12.2years) were included, with 4575 in the no HR dropping group, 8434 in the moderate HR dropping group, and 6501 in the excessive HR dropping group. Excessive HR dropping during hospitalization was significantly associated with an increased risk of CV events (17.1%) compared with the no HR dropping group (14.5%, P<0.001) or the moderate HR dropping group (14.0%, P<0.001), although all-cause mortality was similar among the three groups. After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, excessive HR dropping remained an independent predictor of increased CV event risk [hazard ratio 1.197, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.078-1.328]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of excessive HR dropping on increased CV event risk remained in the subgroups of older age, New York Heart Association class IV, ischaemic HF, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, absence of chronic kidney disease, and use of beta-blockers or ivabradine. Independent determinants associated with excessive HR dropping during admission included use of beta-blockers [odds ratio (OR) 1.683, 95% CI 1.558-1.819], lower discharge diastolic blood pressure (OR 0.988, 95% CI 0.985-0.991), no pacemaker (OR 0.501, 95% CI 0.416-0.603), coexisting atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (OR 1.327, 95% CI 1.218-1.445), and use of digoxin (OR 1.340, 95% CI 1.213-1.480). In hospitalized HFpEF patients, excessive HR dropping during hospitalization is associated with an increased risk of CV death or HF rehospitalization. These findings highlight the importance of HR monitoring and avoiding excessively slowing down HR in hospitalized HFpEF patients to reduce the risk of CV events.

Dapagliflozin versus sacubitril-valsartan for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (CVD). Both dapagliflozin and sacubitril-valsartan have recently shown convincing reductions in the combined risk of CVD and HF hospitalizations in patients with HF and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or HFpEF. We aimed to investigate the cost-per-outcome implications of dapagliflozin vs sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of HFmrEF or HFpEF patients. We compared the annualized cost needed to treat (CNT) to prevent the composite outcome of total HF hospitalizations and CVD with dapagliflozin or sacubitril-valsartan. The CNT was estimated by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (aNNT) by the annual cost of therapy. The aNNT was calculated based on data collected from the DELIVER trial for dapagliflozin and a pooled analysis of the PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF trials for sacubitril-valsartan. Costs were based on 2022 US prices. Scenario analyses were performed to attenuate the differences in the studies' populations. The aNNT with dapagliflozin in DELIVER was 30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21-62) versus 44 (95% CI: 25-311) with sacubitril-valsartan in a pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF, with an annual cost of $4,951 and $5,576, respectively. The corresponding CNTs were $148,547.13 (95% CI: $103,982.99-$306,997.39) for dapagliflozin and $245,346.77 (95% CI: $139,401.58-1,734,155.60) for sacubitril-valsartan for preventing the composite outcome of CVD and HF hospitalizations. The CNT for preventing all-cause mortality was lower for dapagliflozin than sacubitril-valsartan $1,128,958.15 [CI: $401,077.24-∞] vs $2,185,816.71 [CI: $607,790.87-∞]. Dapagliflozin provides a better monetary value than sacubitril-valsartan in preventing the composite outcome of total HF hospitalizations and CVD among patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF.