Hospital Resource Utilization Research Articles

Within-trial hospitalization resource utilization and budget impact analysis for darolutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer using ARASENS.

ARASENS was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial comparing darolutamide + docetaxel + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with placebo + docetaxel + ADT in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). To use clinical trial data from ARASENS to understand whether the addition of darolutamide to docetaxel + ADT leads to increased hospitalizations and to estimate the budget impact on the US health care system. We used mixed-effects negative binomial regression to estimate hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates and length of hospital stay (LoHS) counts. Hospitalization rates were estimated per treatment arm for the period during and after administration of docetaxel. Based on these estimates, a budget impact analysis evaluated the hospitalization costs (including ICU admissions) and standalone ICU hospitalization costs for the totality of the US population over a 5-year time horizon. The analysis compared a scenario without darolutamide vs one with darolutamide included in the US payer formulary. Hospitalization estimates were varied in a one-way sensitivity analysis. The first 4 months of treatment (when patients were receiving docetaxel) were associated with increased hospitalizations across both arms. The addition of darolutamide was associated with a numerical reduction in the rate of hospitalization (per year) due to any reason both during docetaxel treatment (1.01 visits per year [95% CI = 0.82-1.20] vs 1.18 visits per year [95% CI = 0.96-1.41]) and after docetaxel treatment (0.28 visits per year [95% CI = 0.23-0.34] vs 0.33 visits per year [95% CI = 0.27-0.40]). Darolutamide was associated with a marginally longer LoHS per hospitalization compared with placebo (+1.90 days per year) both during and after docetaxel treatment. ICU admissions were low in the ARASENS data; admission rates were assumed to be the same during and after docetaxel treatment. ICU admission rate estimates were equivalent across arms (0.02 visits per year [95% CI = 0.01-0.03]). The budget impact per treated member per month represents a cost-neutral option after Year 5 with a cumulative budget impact of -$9.71. The addition of darolutamide to docetaxel + ADT was associated with a numerically lower rate of hospitalization but marginally longer LoHS compared with docetaxel + ADT alone. Darolutamide represents a cost-neutral alternative per treated member per month compared with docetaxel + ADT with regard to hospitalizations at the end of a 5-year time horizon.

Proof-of-concept for an automatable mortality prediction scoring in hospitalised older adults

IntroductionIt is challenging to prognosticate hospitalised older adults. Delayed recognition of end-of-life leads to failure in delivering appropriate palliative care and increases healthcare utilisation. Most mortality prediction tools specific for older adults require additional manual input, resulting in poor uptake. By leveraging on electronic health records, we aim to create an automatable mortality prediction tool for hospitalised older adults.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed electronic records of general medicine patients ≥75 years at a tertiary hospital between April–September 2021. Demographics, comorbidities, ICD-codes, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hospital Frailty Risk Score, mortality and resource utilization were collected. We defined early deaths, late deaths and survivors as patients who died within 30 days, 1 year, and lived beyond 1 year of admission, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, gender, race, frailty, and CCI. The final prediction model was created using a stepwise logistic regression.ResultsOf 1,224 patients, 168 (13.7%) died early and 370 (30.2%) died late. From adjusted multivariate regression, risk of early death was significantly associated with ≥85 years, intermediate or high frail risk, CCI > 6, cardiovascular risk factors, AMI and pneumonia. For late death, risk factors included ≥85 years, intermediate frail risk, CCI >6, delirium, diabetes, AMI and pneumonia. Our mortality prediction tool which scores 1 point each for age, pneumonia and AMI had an AUC of 0.752 for early death and 0.691 for late death.ConclusionOur mortality prediction model is a proof-of-concept demonstrating the potential for automated medical alerts to guide physicians towards personalised care for hospitalised older adults.

Sociodemographic Disparities and Postoperative Outcomes Following Cranial Vault Remodeling for Craniosynostosis: Analysis of the 2012 to 2021 NSQIP-Pediatric Database.

The objective of this study was to assess whether race and ethnicity are independent predictors of inferior postoperative clinical outcomes, including increased complication rates, extended length of stay (LOS), and unplanned 30-day readmission following cranial vault repair for craniosynostosis. A retrospective cohort study was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Pediatric patients under 2 years of age undergoing cranial vault repair for craniosynostosis between 2012 and 2021 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were dichotomized into 4 cohorts: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and other. Only patients with available race and ethnicity data were included in this study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical variables, postoperative adverse events, and hospital resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of race on complications, extended LOS, and unplanned readmissions. In our cohort of 7764 patients, 72.80% were NHW, 8.44% were NHB, 15.10% were Hispanic, and 3.67% were categorized as "other." Age was significantly different between the 4 cohorts (P<0.001); NHB patients were the oldest, with an average age of 327.69±174.57 days old. Non-Hispanic White experienced the least adverse events while NHB experienced the most (P=0.01). Total operative time and hospital LOS were shorter for NHW patients (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Rates of unplanned 30-day readmission, unplanned reoperation, and 30-day mortality did not differ significantly between the 4 cohorts. On multivariate analysis, race was found to be an independent predictor of extended LOS [NHB: adjusted odds ratio: 1.30 (1.04-1.62), P=0.021; other: 2.28 (1.69-3.04), P=0.005], but not of complications or readmission. Our study demonstrates that racial and ethnic disparities exist among patients undergoing cranial vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis. These disparities, in part, may be due to delayed age of presentation among non-Hispanic, non-White patients. Further investigations to elucidate the underlying causes of these disparities are necessary to address gaps in access to care and provide equitable health care to at-risk populations.

Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome

Previous studies have shown an association between acute limb ischemia and higher mortality in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Although Peripheral Artery Disease is a well-known risk factor for development of macrovascular pathology, the effect of its severity is not well investigated in patients hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Using a national cohort of patients with various degrees of Peripheral Arterial Disease, we investigated in-hospital outcomes in patients who were admitted for ACS. Using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we queried all patients who were hospitalized for ACS (Unstable Angina, Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). Patients were further divided into three groups, either No Peripheral Arterial Disease (Non-PAD), Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) or Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI). Multivariable models were designed to adjust for patient and hospital factors and examine the association between ACS and PAD severity. Of an approximately 3,834,181 hospitalizations for ACS, 6.4% had PAD, 0.2% had CLI and all other were Non-PAD. Following risk adjustment, in hospital mortality was higher by 24% in PAD (AOR 1.24, 95%CI 1.21-1.28) and 86% in CLI (AOR 1.86, 95%CI 1.62-2.09) compared to Non-PAD. Furthermore, PAD and CLI were linked to 1.23-fold (95%CI 1.20-1.26) and 1.67-fold (95%CI 1.45-1.86) greater odds of cardiogenic shock compared to Non-PAD. Additionally, PAD and CLI were linked with higher odds of mechanical circulatory support usage, cardiac arrest and acute kidney injury compared to Non-PAD. Lastly, duration of hospital stay, hospitalization costs and odds of non-home discharge and 30-day readmissions were greater in patients with PAD and CLI compared to Non-PAD. PAD severity was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with ACS, including in hospital mortality and resource utilization.

Impact of Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Cardiac pacemaker implantation may be indicated in patients with refractory bradycardia following a cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). However, evidence about the impact of this procedure on outcomes is lacking. We planned a study to assess whether the implantation of a pacemaker would decrease mortality and hospital resource utilization in patients with CSCI. Adult patients with CSCI in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into "pacemaker" and "non-pacemaker" groups, and their baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 6774 cases were analyzed. The pacemaker group showed higher in-hospital rates of cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay than the non-pacemaker group. Nevertheless, pacemaker placement was associated with a significant decrease in mortality (4.2% vs 26.0%, P < .01). Patients with CSCI requiring a pacemaker placement had better survival than those treated without a pacemaker. Pacemaker implantation should be highly considered in patients who develop refractory bradycardia after CSCI.

The Role of Delirium on Short- and Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes Following Major Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer.

The growing burden of an aging population has raised concerns about demands on healthcare systems and resources, particularly in the context of surgical and cancer care. Delirium can affect treatment outcomes and patient recovery. We sought to determine the prevalence of postoperative delirium among patients undergoing digestive tract surgery for malignant indications and to analyze the role of delirium on surgical outcomes. Medicare claims data were queried to identify patients diagnosed with esophageal, gastric, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers between 2018 and 2021. Postoperative delirium, occurring within 30 days of operation, was identified via International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes. Clinical outcomes of interested included "ideal" textbook outcome (TO), characterized as the absence of complications, an extended hospital stay, readmission within 90 days, or mortality within 90 days. Discharge disposition, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and expenditures also were examined. Among 115,654 cancer patients (esophageal: n = 1854, 1.6%; gastric: n = 4690, 4.1%; hepatobiliary: n = 6873, 5.9%; pancreatic: n = 8912, 7.7%; colorectal: n = 93,325, 90.7%), 2831 (2.4%) were diagnosed with delirium within 30 days after surgery. On multivariable analysis, patients with delirium were less likely to achieve TO (OR 0.27 [95% CI 0.25-0.30]). In particular, patients who experienced delirium had higher odds of complications (OR 3.00 [2.76-3.25]), prolonged length of stay (OR 3.46 [3.18-3.76]), 90-day readmission (OR 1.96 [1.81-2.12]), and 90-day mortality (OR 2.78 [2.51-3.08]). Furthermore, patients with delirium had higher ICU utilization (OR 2.85 [2.62-3.11]). Upon discharge, patients with delirium had a decreased likelihood of being sent home (OR 0.40 [0.36-0.46]) and instead were more likely to be transferred to a skilled nursing facility (OR 2.17 [1.94-2.44]). Due to increased utilization of hospital resources, patients with delirium incurred in-hospital expenditures that were 55.4% higher (no delirium: $16,284 vs. delirium: $28,742) and 90-day expenditures that were 100.7% higher (no delirium: $2564 vs. delirium: $8226) (both p < 0.001). Notably, 3-year postoperative survival was adversely affected by delirium (no delirium: 55.5% vs. delirium: 37.3%), even after adjusting risk for confounding factors (HR 1.79 [1.70-1.90]; p < 0.001). Postoperative delirium occurred in one in 50 patients undergoing surgical resection of a digestive tract cancer. Delirium was linked to a reduced likelihood of achieving an optimal postoperative outcome, increased ICU utilization, higher expenditures, and a worse long-term prognosis. Initiatives to prevent delirium are vital to improve postoperative outcomes among cancer surgery patients.

Surgery Advances in Gynecologic Tumors: The Evolution and Outcomes of Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers in a Tertiary Center.

The integration of innovation into routine clinical practice is faced with many challenges. In 2007, we received the mandate to evaluate how the introduction of a robotic program in gynecologic oncology affected patient-centered care by studying its impact on clinical outcomes and hospital resource utilization. Here we summarize the history and experience of developing a robotic surgery program for gynecologic cancers over 16 years. Analysis of the data indicates that robotic surgery improved perioperative patient clinical parameters, decreased blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, maintained the oncologic outcome, and is cost-effective, resulting in it becoming the dominant surgical approach in gynecologic oncology in a tertiary cancer care institution.

Length of Stay Prediction Models for Oral Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning, Statistical and ACS-NSQIP.

Accurate prediction of hospital length of stay (LOS) following surgical management of oral cavity cancer (OCC) may be associated with improved patient counseling, hospital resource utilization and cost. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of statistical models, a machine learning (ML) model, and The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS-NSQIP) calculator in predicting LOS following surgery for OCC. A retrospective multicenter database study was performed at two major academic head and neck cancer centers. Patients with OCC who underwent major free flap reconstructive surgery between January 2008 and June 2019 surgery were selected. Data were pooled and split into training and validation datasets. Statistical and ML models were developed, and performance was evaluated by comparing predicted and actual LOS using correlation coefficient values and percent accuracy. Totally 837 patients were selected with mean patient age being 62.5 ± 11.7 [SD] years and 67% being male. The ML model demonstrated the best accuracy (validation correlation 0.48, 4-day accuracy 70%), compared with the statistical models: multivariate analysis (0.45, 67%) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (0.42, 70%). All were superior to the ACS-NSQIP calculator's performance (0.23, 59%). We developed statistical and ML models that predicted LOS following major free flap reconstructive surgery for OCC. Our models demonstrated superior predictive performance to the ACS-NSQIP calculator. The ML model identified several novel predictors of LOS. These models must be validated in other institutions before being used in clinical practice. Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Beyond prevention: Unveiling the benefits of triple vaccination on COVID-19 severity and resource utilization in solid organ transplant recipients

ObjectiveDespite the widespread reduction in COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality attributed to vaccination in the general population, vaccine efficacy in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) remains under-characterized. This study aimed to investigate clinically relevant outcomes on double and triple-vaccinated versus unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19. Study design and settingA retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was performed utilizing data from the US Collaborative Network Database within TriNetX (n = 117,905,631). We recruited vaccinated and unvaccinated (matched controls) SOTR with COVID-19 over two time periods to control for vaccine availability: December 2020 to October 2022 (bi-dose, double-dose vaccine effectiveness) and December 2020 to April 2023 (tri-dose, triple-dose vaccine effectiveness). A total of 42 factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity were controlled for including age, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. We monitored 30-day outcomes including acute respiratory failure, intubation, and death following a diagnosis of COVID-19. ResultsSubjects were categorized into two cohorts based on the two time periods: bi-dose cohort (vaccinated, n = 462; unvaccinated, n = 20,998); tri-dose cohort (vaccinated, n = 517; unvaccinated, n = 23,061).Compared to unvaccinated SOTR, 30-day mortality was significantly lower for vaccinated subjects in both cohorts: tri-dose (2.0% vs 7.5%, HR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.46]); bi-dose (3.7% vs 8.2%, HR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.76]). Hospital admission rates were similar between bi-dose vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects (33.1% vs 28.6%, HR = 1.2 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.52]). In contrast, tri-dose vaccinated subjects had a significantly lower likelihood of hospital admission (29.4% vs 36.6%, HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.6, 0.91]). Intubation rates were significantly lower for triple-vaccinated- (2.3% vs 5.2%, p < 0.05), but not double-vaccinated subjects (3.0% vs 5.2%, p > 0.05). ConclusionIn solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, triple vaccination, but not double vaccination, against SARS-CoV-2 was associated with significantly less hospital resource utilization, decreased disease severity, and fewer short-term complications. These real-world data from extensively matched controls support the protective effects of COVID-19 vaccination with boosters in this vulnerable population.

Managing incisional wounds with Prevena VAC therapy in lower-extremity vascular surgery: A comparative study.

Vascular surgical site infections have been reported with an overall incidence of 5-10% for patients undergoing arterial interventions and as high as 10-20% for lower-limb bypass grafting procedures. Given that vascular surgery patients are known to be at a higher risk of postoperative wound infections and other complications, our objective was to evaluate a potential method to reduce such complications. This study compares the rate of wound healing complications between incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings in vascular surgery patients with infra-inguinal incisions. The primary endpoint is complete closure of the wound at the 2-week follow-up appointment. Secondary endpoints include frequency infections requiring antibiotics, need for wound revision, and wound dehiscence. A prospective cohort study with retrospective control group was performed following infra-inguinal vascular surgeries for peripheral arterial disease at the Mount Carmel Health System. The patients included in this study were those who underwent a lower-extremity vascular procedure with primary closure of an incision distal to the groin between January 2014 and July 2018. Patients that had received an infra-inguinal incision with primary closure were included. Patients in the experimental group who had a Prevena Wound VAC were compared with a retrospectively obtained control arm treated with conventional dressings. Data regarding wound healing and complications, specifically infections and wound dehiscence, were obtained. A total of 201 patients were recruited in our study: 64 in the Prevena group and 137 in the control group. There was a significant reduction in the number of open wounds in the Prevena group compared to the control group at the 2-week follow-up (10.9% Prevena vs 33.6% control; p = .0005). When evaluated in aggregate, there was a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients who succumbed to any complication in the Prevena arm compared with traditional dressings (13 (20.3%) Prevena vs 72 (52.6%) control; p < .0001). The results of our study suggest there should be a significant consideration for the use of NPWT as a prophylactic measure to reduce the risk of wound complications of primarily closed infra-inguinal incisions in vascular surgery patients following common vascular procedures. Its use is particularly effective for patients at enhanced risk of infection, especially those with poor vascularization from BMI, smoking, and diabetes. This leads to decreased trends in antibiotic use, ED visits, readmissions, and surgical revisions, which translates to decreased utilization of hospital resources and economic burden.

Characteristics of Drug Poisonings Seen in the Emergency Department of an Urban Hospital.

Drug poisoning, either intentional or non-intentional, is a frequent diagnosis in the emergency department (ED), necessitating patient management from multiple services. To describe the drug poisonings seen in the ED of a large academic urban hospital. This retrospective descriptive study used 3 years of data (2018-2020) abstracted from the hospital's electronic medical record system and linked to validated, coded extracts from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database. Patients with a diagnosis of acute drug poisoning who presented to the ED were identified on the basis of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, Canada (ICD-10-CA) codes, and data were collected for demographic characteristics, the drugs involved, in-hospital management, and inpatient outcomes. Patients with diagnosis of an acute drug reaction, inebriation, or nondrug or in-hospital poisoning were excluded. Data were stratified and analyzed in relation to the intent of drug poisoning. A total of 2983 visits for drug poisoning, involving 2211 unique patients (mean age 38.3 [standard deviation 16.2] years, 54.7% female), were included, yielding an overall incidence rate of 15.7 drug poisonings per 1000 ED visits (8.1 intentional, 6.4 non-intentional, and 1.3 unknown intent). Among the 1505 intentional drug poisonings, the most prevalent drug sources were antidepressants (n = 405, 26.9%), benzodiazepines (n = 375, 24.9%), and acetaminophen (n = 329, 21.9%); in contrast, opioids (n = 594, 48.1%) were most prevalent for the 1236 non-intentional poisonings. For 716 (24.0%) of the poisoning visits, the patient was admitted to acute care services, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.0% (n = 31). In addition, 111 patients (9.0%) with non-intentional drug poisoning left against medical advice. Finally, for 772 (25.9%) of the poisoning visits, the patient returned to the ED after discharge with a subsequent drug poisoning. Drug poisonings are a common cause of visits to urban EDs. They are rarely fatal but are associated with substantial utilization of hospital resources and considerable recidivism.

Impact on Hospital Resource Utilization of Endoluminal Bypass Using the Viabahn Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface Compared With Surgical Femoropopliteal Bypass.

To assess the impact of heparin-bonded endoprosthesis compared with femoropopliteal bypass on key hospital resources and revenues up to 1-year follow-up. A 2-arm scenario resource consumption data analysis was modeled based on a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial. Six centers in the Netherlands. A total of 100 patients were assigned to 2 arms (50 each arm). The first arm evaluated endovascular treatment using the heparin-bonded Viabahn endoprosthesis and the second the femoropopliteal bypass. Resource consumption rates were compared between arms. Resource consumption rates, including hospital stay for bypass procedure, operating room time, type of anesthesia, number of used (endo)grafts, use of different types of bed locations (vascular ward, medium or intensive care), readmission for wound infections, and reinterventions over a period of 12 months. Endovascular repair used fewer hospital resources, with an overall difference of €149.983. Hospital stay was 118 days less (261 vs 379), including 21 fewer days in medium/intensive care (5 vs 26) and 50 fewer operating room hours (100 vs 150). Fewer patients required general anesthesia (31 vs 39), and there were less surgical site infections (3 vs 12). In the surgical bypass group, there were 18 fewer days of hospital stay related to reinterventions (80 vs 62), and the cost of the devices was €309.996, cheaper. The total monetary difference was € 160.013, in favor of the femoropopliteal bypass (€3.200, per patient). Endovascular repair of the superficial femoral artery reduces the use of valuable hospital resources. Its major limitation is the cost of the devices, which should be balanced against the reduction in peri-procedural morbidity and faster recovery. In the context of shortage of hospital beds, it offers capacity benefits, allowing for the treatment of more patients overall. These benefits may outweigh the fewer reinterventions in the surgical bypass group. The SuperB Trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov; NCT-ID: NCT01220245. Modeling is a useful technique to predict the impact of treatment modalities on hospital resources and revenue. This study uses real-world data from the SuperB Trial to compare two treatment strategies of superficial femoral artery disease, reflecting actual clinical practice and patient outcomes. The analysis focused on direct costs associated with hospital resources and device usage without considering indirect costs or long-term cost-effectiveness. The analysis showed that endovascular repair reduces the use of valuable hospital resources. Its major limitation is device costs, which should be balanced against the reduction in peri-procedural morbidity and faster recovery. In the context of shortage of hospital beds, it offers capacity benefits, allowing for the treatment of more patients overall.

Unplanned Readmissions in Children with Medical Complexity in Saudi Arabia: A Large Multicenter Study.

Children with medical complexity (CMC) account for a substantial proportion of healthcare spending, and one-third of their expenditures are due to readmissions. However, knowledge regarding the healthcare-resource utilization and characteristics of CMC in Saudi Arabia is limited. To describe hospitalization patterns and characteristics of Saudi CMC with an unplanned 30-day readmission. This retrospective study included Saudi CMC (aged 0-14 years) who had an unplanned 30-day readmission at six tertiary centers in Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, Alahsa, and Almadina between January 2016 and December 2020. Hospital-based inclusion criteria focused on CMC with multiple complex chronic conditions (CCCs) and technology assistance (TA) device use. CMC were compared across demographics, clinical characteristics, and hospital-resource utilization. A total of 9139 pediatric patients had unplanned 30-day readmission during the study period, of which 680 (7.4%) met the inclusion criteria. Genetic conditions were the most predominant primary pathology (66.3%), with one-third of cases (33.7%) involving the neuromuscular system. During the index admission, pneumonia was the most common diagnosis (33.1%). Approximately 35.1% of the readmissions were after 2 weeks. Pneumonia accounted for 32.5% of the readmissions. After readmission, 16.9% of patients were diagnosed with another CCC or received a new TA device, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 6.6%. The rate of unplanned 30-day readmissions in children with medical complexity in Saudi Arabia is 7.4%, which is lower than those reported from developed countries. Saudi children with CCCs and TA devices were readmitted approximately within similar post-discharge time and showed distinct hospitalization patterns associated with specific diagnoses. To effectively reduce the risk of 30-day readmissions, targeted measures must be introduced both during the hospitalization period and after discharge.

Submental Island Flaps for Lateral Reconstruction: Technical Refinements for Optimal Outcomes and Resource Efficiency.

To describe our modifications to the submental island flap (SMIF) in a case series that demonstrates improved reproducibility, shortened length of stay (LOS),and reduced utilization of hospital resources. This retrospective case series with chart review included adult patients who underwent resection of malignant or benign tumors resulting in lateral facial, parotid, or temporal bone defects, which were reconstructed with SMIF. A tertiary-care academic referral center. Retrospective case series included all adult patients who underwent SMIF reconstruction between March 2020 and August 2021. Patient demographic and clinical data were collected. Primary outcomes were measures of hospital utilization including duration of surgery, LOS, and postoperative outcomes. Twenty-eight patients were included with a mean age of 71.7 years. Eighty percent were male. All patients underwent parotidectomy, and the mean operative time was 347minutes. The median LOS was 2.5 days (range 0-16 days). Seventy-five percent of the flaps drained into the internal jugular vein, and 25% drained into the external jugular vein. No patients required reoperation or readmission. All flaps survived. SMIFs are a safe and effective option for reconstruction of lateral facial, parotid, and temporal bone defects. Compared to free flap reconstruction, SMIFs offer reduced length of surgery, decreased use of health care resources, and lower rate of reoperation. As health care resource allocation is increasingly important, the SMIF offers an excellent alternative to free flap reconstruction of lateral defects.

Opiate-reduction protocol for common outpatient spinal procedures: a long-term feasibility study and single-center experience.

The opioid epidemic continues to be at the forefront of public health. As a response to this crisis, many statewide and national medical groups have sought to develop opioid-prescribing guidelines for both acute and chronic pain states. Given the lack of evidence in the neurosurgical landscape, the authors' institution implemented opioid-prescribing guidelines for common outpatient spinal procedures in 2017, subsequently demonstrating a significant reduction in the narcotics prescribed. However, the ability to maintain the results garnered from such guidelines long term has not been described. The objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative opioid utilization at a high-volume quaternary referral center 5 years after the initial implementation of an opioid-reduction protocol for common outpatient spinal procedures. From the electronic medical records, authors collected data on the number of tablets and total morphine equivalent dose (MED) prescribed, acute postoperative readmissions for pain concerns, refill requests, and conversion to long-term opiate use in the 5 years following implementation of an opioid-reduction protocol for common outpatient spinal procedures. These procedures, undertaken in opiate-naive patients, included 1- or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, 1- or 2-level cervical disc replacement, and 1- or 2-level laminectomy, laminotomy, or foraminotomy (cervical or lumbar). The total quantity of narcotics was reduced by 37.0 tablets per patient after protocol implementation and over the 5-year period thereafter. Generally, patients were discharged with an average of 23.3 tablets, concurrent with the initial goal of 24 tablets, set forth in 2017. These results confirm an ongoing reduction in opiate quantities prescribed and overall morphine equivalent totals at the time of discharge over the course of 5 years after initial protocol implementation. A standardized discharge protocol for postoperative outpatient spinal procedures can lead to long-term reductions in opioid discharge quantity, without compromising patient safety or increasing the utilization of hospital resources through readmissions, refill requests, or clinic phone calls. This study provides an example of a feasible and effective discharge prescription regimen that may be generalizable to common outpatient neurosurgical procedures with long-term evidence that a small intervention can lead to ongoing reduced quantities of postoperative opioids at the time of discharge.

175 A Patient Prioritization Tool for Non-elective Spine Surgeries: Improving Patient Outcomes and Reducing Adverse Events in a Level-1 Trauma Center

INTRODUCTION: The ability to provide comprehensive care at a level 1 trauma center has become challenging, especially considering the impact of COVID on healthcare. These resource-intensive challenges have been exacerbated by provider burnout and a shortage of healthcare providers. In a high-volume tertiary care center, these factors have led to delayed access to care, and potentially an increased incidence of adverse outcomes for non-elective surgical patients. As health systems learn to adapt to these challenges, developing protocols or tools to prioritize patients is paramount for sustainable healthcare systems. METHODS: A database review of all non-elective surgeries at a single level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: A total of 2,088 surgeries were analyzed and 764 (36%) of surgeries were delayed. There was an increase in the prevalence of delays following the start of COVID-19 (33% to 37%), especially amongst the patients who did not require emergent surgery (&lt;12 hours) (51% vs 38%, p &lt; 0.0001). The average time delay to surgery increased from 54.5 hours to 168 hours peaking at 312 hours mid-pandemic. The prevalence of any complication for all patients was 13.3%, including 1.2% mortality rate, 8.1% readmission rate within 90 days, 0.6% infection rate and prolonged LOS (10.2 vs 9.2 days). Amongst the patients with surgical delays, there was a statistically higher mortality rate (3% vs 1%, p-value &lt; 0.05), complication rate (34.7% vs 13.1%, p &lt; 0.0001) and readmission rate (23% vs 8%, p &lt; 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in delay for non-elective spine surgery led to increased hospital resource utilization, higher complication and readmission rates, and higher mortality rates in a level-1 trauma center.

The Landscape of Resource Utilization After Resuscitation of 22-, 23-, and 24-Weeks’ Gestation Infants

ObjectiveTo compare estimated healthcare resources needed to care for 22 through 24 weeks’ gestation infants. Study designThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 1,505 live in-born and out-born infants 22 through 24 weeks’ gestational age at delivery from six pediatric tertiary care hospitals from 2011 through 2020. Median neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay (LOS) for each gestational age was used as a proxy for hospital resource utilization, and the number of comorbidities and medical technology use for each infant were used as estimates of future medical care needs. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis with Nemenyi’s post hoc test and Fisher’s exact test. ResultsOf the identified newborns, 22-week infants had shorter median LOS than their 23- and 24-week counterparts due to low survival rates. There was no significant difference in LOS for surviving 22-week infants compared with surviving 23-week infants. Surviving 22-week infants had similar proportions of comorbidities and medical technology use as 23-week infants. ConclusionsCompared with 23- and 24-week infants, 22-week infants did not use a disproportionate amount of hospital resources. 22-week infants should not be excluded from resuscitation based on concern for increased hospital care and medical technology requirements. As overall resuscitation efforts and survival rates increase for 22-week infants, future research will be needed to assess the evolution of these results.

Complications in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Navigating Challenges in Diagnosis and Management

In recent decades, significant advancements in pharmacological, catheter-based, and surgical reperfusion technologies have markedly improved outcomes for individuals undergoing acute myocardial infarction. Despite these remarkable progressions, a segment of patients, particularly those with extensive infarctions or delays in revascularization, remains vulnerable to the onset of mechanical complications associated with myocardial infarction. These complications, spanning mechanical, electrical, ischemic, inflammatory, and thromboembolic events, pose substantial risks of morbidity, mortality, and increased utilization of hospital resources. The management of patients experiencing these complications is intricate, necessitating collaborative efforts among various specialties. Timely identification, accurate diagnosis, hemodynamic stabilization, and decision-making support are crucial for guiding patients and their families in choosing between definitive treatments or palliative care. This review underscores the critical importance of promptly identifying and initiating therapy to reduce prolonged periods of cardiogenic shock and the potential for fatality. By presenting key clinical and diagnostic insights, this review aims to further improve early diagnosis and offer an updated perspective on current management strategies for the diverse range of complications associated with acute myocardial infarction.

Rising Inpatient Utilization and Costs of Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome Hospitalizations in Massachusetts After Cannabis Legalization.

We described the demographics, inpatient utilization, and cost of services among patients hospitalized for putative cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) predating and postdating cannabis legalization in Massachusetts. As the recreational use of cannabis has been widely legalized nationally, the resulting shifts in clinical presentation, health care utilization, and estimated costs of CHS hospitalizations remain unclear in the postlegalization era. We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to a large urban hospital between 2012 and 2021, before and after the date of cannabis legalization in Massachusetts (Dec 15, 2016). We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients admitted for putative CHS, the utilization of hospital services, and estimated inpatient costs pre and postlegalization. We identified a significant increase in putative CHS hospitalizations pre and post-cannabis legalization in Massachusetts (0.1% vs 0.02% of total admissions per time period, P < 0.05). Across 72 CHS hospitalizations, patient demographics were similar pre and postlegalization. Hospital resource utilization increased postlegalization, with increased length of stay (3 d vs 1 d, P < 0.005), and need for antiemetics ( P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression confirmed that postlegalization admissions were independently associated with increased length of stay ( Β = 5.35, P < 0.05). The mean cost of hospitalization was significantly higher postlegalization ($18,714 vs $7460, P < 0.0005), even after adjusting for medical inflation ($18,714 vs $8520, P < 0.001) with intravenous fluid administration and endoscopy costs increased ( P < 0.05). On multivariate linear regression, hospitalization for putative CHS during postlegalization predicted increased costs ( Β = 10,131.25, P < 0.05). In the postlegalization era of cannabis in Massachusetts, we found increased putative CHS hospitalizations, with a concomitant increased length of hospital stay and total cost per hospitalization. As cannabis use increases, the recognition and costs of its deleterious effects are necessary to incorporate into future clinical practice strategies and health policy.

Resource Utilization following Anterior Versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Acute Central Cord Syndrome.

Retrospective cohort study. The purpose of this study is to compare the impact of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) versus posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for the treatment of acute traumatic central cord syndrome (CCS) on hospital episodes of care in terms of (1) cost, (2) length of hospital stay, and (3) discharge destination. Acute traumatic CCS is the most common form of spinal cord injury in the United States. CCS is commonly treated with surgical decompression and fusion. Hospital resource utilization based on surgical approach remains unclear. Patients undergoing ACDF and PCDF for acute traumatic CCS were identified using the 2019 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Limited Data Set and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2019 Impact File. Multivariate models for hospital cost of care, length of stay, and discharge destination were performed, controlling for confounders. Subanalysis of accommodation and revenue center cost drivers was performed. There were 1474 cases that met inclusion criteria: 673 ACDF (45.7%) and 801 PCDF (54.3%). ACDF was independently associated with a decreased cost of $9802 (P<0.001) and a 59.2% decreased risk of discharge to nonhome destinations (adjusted odds ratio: 0.408, P<0.001). The difference in length of stay was not statistically significant. On subanalysis of cost drivers, ACDF was associated with decreased charges ($55,736, P<0.001) compared with PCDF, the largest drivers being the intensive care unit ($15,873, 28% of total charges, P<0.001) and medical/surgical supply charges ($19,651, 35% of total charges, P<0.001). For treatment of acute traumatic CCS, ACDF was associated with almost $10,000 less expensive cost of care and a 60% decreased risk of discharge to nonhome destination compared with PCDF. The largest cost drivers appear to be ICU and medical/surgical-related. These findings may inform value-based decisions regarding the treatment of acute traumatic CCS. However, injury and patient clinical factors should always be prioritized in surgical decision-making, and increased granularity in reimbursement policies is needed to prevent financial disincentives in the treatment of patients with CCS better addressed with posterior approach-surgery.