Hospital Medicine Physicians Research Articles

Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study.

Various strategies have attempted to address increased patient lengths of stay (LOS), but effectiveness varies. Factors related to work design and workforce experience may also play significant roles. Utilizing data from the Discharge in the A.M. trial, we aimed to validate an electronic measure of workload (i.e., note count) and assess the relationship of workload, patient complexity, and physician years of experience to LOS. Retrospective observational study at three large academic hospitals with hospital medicine physicians and patients they care for during the study. Workload as measured by electronic note count and physician years of experience; patient LOS. From February 9, 2021 to July 31, 2021, 59 physicians completed daily surveys for 93% of 2318 scheduled shifts. We observed a moderate correlation (r: .56) between starting morning census and note counts but no association with LOS. We observed an effect modification between note count and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with LOS increasing by 2.3% (95% CI: 0.3%, 4.3%; p = .02) and 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 5.9%; p < .0001) per patient for every 1 unit increase in note count for patients with a moderate CCI or severe CCI, respectively. Years since training was associated with a 0.7% decrease in LOS (95% CI: -1.3%, -0.1%, p = .03). Physician workload, as measured by note count, was associated with longer LOS with higher CCI, while more years of experience was associated with shorter LOS. Original Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05370638.

Implementation of a bundle to improve diagnosis in hospitalized patients: lessons learned.

The inpatient setting is a challenging clinical environment where systems and situational factors predispose clinicians to making diagnostic errors. Environmental complexities limit trialing of interventions to improve diagnostic error in active inpatient clinical settings. Informed by prior work, we piloted a multi-component intervention designed to reduce diagnostic error to understand its feasibility and uptake. From September 2018 to June 2019, we conducted a prospective, pre-test/post-test pilot study of hospital medicine physicians during admitting shifts at a tertiary-care, academic medical center. Optional intervention components included use of dedicated workspaces, privacy barriers, noise cancelling headphones, application-based breathing exercises, a differential diagnosis expander application, anda checklist to enable a diagnostic pause. Participants rated their confidence in patient diagnoses and completed a survey on intervention component use. Data on provider resource utilization and patient diagnoses were collected, and qualitative interviews were held with a subset of participants in order to better understand experience with the intervention. Data from 37 physicians and 160 patients were included. No intervention component was utilized by more than 50 % of providers, and no differences were noted in diagnostic confidence or number of diagnoses documented pre-vs. post-intervention. Lab utilization increased, but there were no other differences in resource utilization during the intervention. Qualitative feedback highlighted workflow integration challenges, among others, for poor intervention uptake. Our pilot study demonstrated poor feasibility and uptake of an intervention designed to reduce diagnostic error. This study highlights the unique challenges of implementing solutions within busy clinical environments.

What Constitutes High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism? Comparing Approaches to Determining an Appropriate Threshold.

Guidelines recommend pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis only for high-risk patients, but the probability of VTE considered "high-risk" is not specified. Our objective was to define an appropriate probability threshold (or range) for VTE risk stratification and corresponding prophylaxis in medical inpatients. Patients were adults admitted to any of 10 Cleveland Clinic Health System hospitals between December 2020 and August 2021 (N = 41,036). Hospital medicine physicians and internal medicine residents from included hospitals were surveyed between June and November 2023 (N = 214). We compared five approaches to determining a threshold: decision analysis, maximizing the sensitivity and specificity of a logistic regression model, deriving a probability from a point-based model, surveying physicians' understanding of VTE risk, and deriving a probability from physician behavior. For each approach, we determined the probability threshold above which a patient would be considered high-risk for VTE. We applied each threshold to the Cleveland Clinic VTE risk assessment model (CCM) and calculated the percentage of the 41,036 patients in our cohort who would be considered eligible for prophylaxis due to their high-risk status. We compared these hypothetical prophylaxis rates with physicians' observed prophylaxis rates. The different approaches yielded thresholds ranging from 0.3% to 5.4%, corresponding inversely with hypothetical prophylaxis rates of 0.2% to 75%. Multiple thresholds clustered between 0.52% to 0.55%, suggesting an average hypothetical prophylaxis rate of approximately 30%, whereas physicians' observed prophylaxis rates ranged from 48% to 76%. Multiple approaches to determining a probability threshold for VTE prophylaxis converged to suggest an optimal threshold of approximately 0.5%. Other approaches yielded extreme thresholds that are unrealistic for clinical practice. Physicians prescribed prophylaxis much more frequently than the suggested rate of 30%, indicating opportunity to reduce unnecessary prophylaxis. To aid in these efforts, guidelines should explicitly quantify high-risk.

Needs of family caregivers of hospitalised adults with dementia during care transitions: a qualitative study in a US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital

ObjectiveTo identify the needs of caregivers of hospitalised adults with dementia in the hospital and during care transitions.DesignPragmatic qualitative inquiry with semi-structured interviews.SettingMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in...

Association Between Gender and Salary Among Pediatric Hospital Medicine Physicians.

Gender-based disparities in salary exist in multiple fields of medicine. However, there is limited data examining gender inequities in salary in pediatric hospital medicine (PHM). Our primary objective was to assess whether gender-based salary differences exist in PHM. The secondary objective was to assess if, among women, the differences in salary varied on the basis of leadership positions or self-identified race and ethnicity. We conducted a survey-based, cross-sectional study of pediatric hospitalists in December 2021. Our primary outcomes were base and total salary, adjusted for the reported number of average weekly work hours. We performed subanalyses by presence of a leadership position, as well as race. We used a weighted t test using inverse probability weighting to compare the outcomes between genders. A total of 559 eligible people responded to our survey (51.0%). After propensity score weighting, women's mean base salary was 87.7% of men's base (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.8%-96.4%, P < .01), and women's total salary was 85.6% of men's total (95% CI 73.2%-100.0%, P = .05) salary. On subgroup analysis of respondents with a leadership position, women's total salary was 80.6% of men's total salary (95% CI 68.7%-94.4%, P < .01). Although women who identified as white had base salaries that were 86.6% of white men's base salary (95% CI 78.5%-95.5%, P < .01), there was no gender-based difference noted between respondents that identified as nonwhite (88.4% [69.9%-111.7%] for base salary, 80.3% [57.2% to 112.7%]). Gender-based discrepancies in salary exists in PHM, which were increased among those with leadership roles. Continued work and advocacy are required to achieve salary equity within PHM.

Development of antibiotic metrics for hospitalists via multi-institutional modified Delphi survey.

Closing the gap between evidence-supported antibiotic use and real-world prescribing among clinicians is vital for curbing excessive antibiotic use, which fosters antimicrobial resistance and exposes patients to antimicrobial side effects. Providing prescribing information via scorecard improves clinician adherence to quality metrics. We aimed to delineate actionable, relevant antimicrobial prescribing metrics extractable from the electronic health record in an automated way. We used a modified Delphi consensus-building approach. Our study entailed two iterations of an electronic surveydisseminated to hospital medicine physicians at 10 academic medical centers nationwide. Main outcomes comprised consensus metrics describing the quality of antibiotic prescribing to hospital medicine physicians. Twenty-eight participants from 10 United States institutions completed the first survey version containing 38 measures. Sixteen respondents completed the second survey, which contained 37 metrics. Sixteen metrics, which were modified based on qualitative survey feedback, met criteria for inclusion in the final scorecard. Metrics considered most relevant by hospitalists focused on the appropriate de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy, selection of guideline-concordant antibiotics, and appropriate duration of treatment for common infectious syndromes. Next steps involve prioritization and implementation of these metrics based on quality gaps at our institution, focus groups exploring impressions of clinicians who receive a scorecard,and analysis of antibiotic prescribing patterns before and after metric implementation. Other institutions may be able to implement metrics from this scorecard based on their own quality gaps to provide hospitalists with automated feedback related to antibiotic prescribing.

Communicating Patient Discharge Readiness: An Implementation Evaluation in an Inpatient Hospital Medicine Setting.

The progression of patients through a hospital from admission to discharge can be slowed by delays in patient discharge, increasing pressure on health care staff. We designed and piloted the Discharge Today tool, with the goal of improving the efficiency of patient discharge; however, adoption remained low. To close this implementation gap, we deployed and evaluated a 4-part implementation strategy bundle. We measured the success of implementation by evaluating validated implementation outcomes using both quantitative and qualitative methods, grounded in Normalization Process Theory. The implementation strategies used were effective for increasing use of the Discharge Today tool by hospital medicine physicians and advanced practice providers during both the active and passive implementation periods. While the implementation strategies used were effective, qualitative findings indicate that limitations in the functionality of the tool, alongside inconsistent use of the tool across clinical staff, continued to inhibit adoption.

Annals for Hospitalists Inpatient Notes - Key Clinical Concepts for Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis for Hospitalists.

This brief commentary summarizes what hospital medicine physicians should know about alcohol-associated hepatitis, a severe clinical entity that develops in patients with alcohol-related liver disease.

Domains of professional fulfillment for pediatric hospital medicine: A concept mapping study.

We know little about how pediatric hospital medicine(PHM) physicians conceptualize their professional fulfillment (PF). The objective of this study was to determine how PHM physicians conceptualize PF. The objective of this study was to determine how PHM physicians conceptualize PF. We performed a single-site group concept mapping (GCM) study to create a stakeholder-informed model of PHM PF. We followed established GCM steps. For brainstorming, PHM physicians responded to a prompt to generate ideas describing the concept of PHM PF. Next, PHM physicians sorted the ideas based on conceptual relatedness and ranked them on importance. Responses were analyzed to create point cluster maps where each idea represented one point, and point proximity illustrated how often ideas were sorted together. Using an iterative and consensus-driven approach, we selected a cluster map best representing the ideas. Mean rating scores for all the items in each cluster were calculated. Sixteen PHM physicians identified 90 unique ideas related to PHM PF. The final cluster map described ninedomains for PHM PF: (1) work personal-fit, (2) people-centered climate, (3) divisional cohesion and collaboration, (4) supportive and growth-oriented environment, (5) feeling valued and respected, (6) confidence, contribution, and credibility, (7) meaningful teaching and mentoring, (8) meaningful clinical work, and (9) structures to facilitate effective patient care. The domains with the highest and lowest importance ratings were divisional cohesion and collaboration and meaningful teaching and mentoring. Domains of PF for PHM physicians extend beyond existing PF models, particularly the importance of teaching and mentoring.

The impact of health inequities on physicians' occupational well-being during COVID-19: A qualitative analysis from four US cities.

The aim of this study is to describe frontline physicians' perceptions of the impact of racial-ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 infection and mortality on their occupational well-being. One hundred and forty-five qualitative, semistructured interviews were conducted between February 2021 and June 2022 with hospital medicine, emergency medicine, pulmonary/critical care, and palliative care physicians caring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in four UScities. Physicians reported encountering COVID-related health disparities and inequities at the societal, organizational, and individual levels. Encountering these inequities, in turn, contributed to stress among frontline physicians, whose concerns revealed how structural conditions both shaped COVID disparities and constrained their ability to protectpopulationsat risk from poor outcomes. Physicians reported feeling complicit in the perpetuation of inequities or helpless to mitigate observed inequities and experienced feelings of grief, guilt, moral distress, and burnout. Health inequities are an under-acknowledged source of physicians' occupational stress that requires solutions beyond the clinical context.

Using Quality Improvement to Improve Identification and Documentation of Malnutrition in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.

Introduction:Recent publications have highlighted the importance and impact of recognizing malnutrition in hospitalized children. After noting that patients with malnutrition frequently went unrecognized in our facility, we implemented an interprofessional intervention comprising hospital medicine physicians, dietitians, and the clinical documentation improvement team to improve recognition and documentation of malnutrition in these patients, thereby facilitating earlier intervention.Methods:We implemented three separate plan-do-study-act cycles to improve the identification and documentation of malnutrition among patients hospitalized at our facility. The cycles consisted of identifying malnutrition using z-scores, educating providers, and implementing smart text within the medical record to help with consistent documentation. In addition, real-time communication between the disciplines (nutrition services, clinical documentation improvement providers, and hospitalists) was also employed to improve documentation quality. After completing the plan-do-study-act cycles, charts were reviewed to evaluate the nutritional interventions received.Results:Baseline data revealed that only 13% of patients with z-scores indicative of malnutrition were identified as such in attending physicians’ documentation. Upon implementation of our plan-do-study-act cycles, documentation of these patients increased to greater than 64%. Patients with documented malnutrition received nutritional interventions at least 81% of the time, increasing from 35% at baseline.Conclusion:Our findings demonstrate that an interprofessional approach can dramatically enhance the identification and documentation of malnutrition in hospitalized children, leading to earlier intervention.

Conversations on Diagnostic Uncertainty and Its Management Among Pediatric Acute Care Physicians.

Diagnosis is a complex, iterative, and nonlinear process, often occurring over time. When presenting signs, symptoms, and diagnostic testing cannot be integrated into a diagnosis, clinicians are confronted with diagnostic uncertainty. Our aim was to study the self-reported cognitive, communication, and management behaviors of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) physicians regarding diagnostic uncertainty. A qualitative study was conducted through focus groups with PEM and PHM physicians in a large academic pediatric medical center. Four focus groups were conducted. Interviews were recorded, deidentified, and transcribed by a team member. Thematic analysis was used to review the transcripts, highlight ideas, and organize ideas into themes. Themes were categorized using the model of the diagnostic process from the National Academy of Sciences. "Red flags" and "gut feelings" were prominent during the information, integration, and interpretation phases. To combat diagnostic uncertainty, physicians employed strategies such as "the diagnostic pause" and having a set of "fresh eyes" to review the data. It was important to all clinicians to rule out any "cannot miss" diagnoses. Interphysician communication was direct; communication with patient and families about uncertainty was less direct because of physician concern of being thought of as untrustworthy. Contingency planning, "disposition over diagnosis" by ensuring patient safety, the "test of time," and availability of resources were techniques used by physicians to manage diagnostic uncertainty. Physicians shared common mitigation strategies, which included consulting colleagues and targeting cannot miss diagnoses, but gaps remain regarding communicating diagnostic uncertainty to families.

Resolving Pediatric Preventive Care Gaps Through Hospital Inreach.

Panel management processes have been used to help improve population-level care and outreach to patients outside the health care system. Opportunities to resolve gaps in preventive care are often missed when patients present outside of primary care settings but still within the larger health care system. We hypothesized that we could design a process of "inreach" capable of resolving care gaps traditionally addressed solely in primary care settings. Our aim was to identify and resolve gaps in vaccinations and screening for lead exposure for children within our primary care registry aged 2 to 66 months who were admitted to the hospital. We sought to increase care gaps closed from 12% to 50%. We formed a multidisciplinary team composed of primary care and hospital medicine physicians, nursing leadership, and quality improvement experts within the Division of General and Community Pediatrics. The team identified a smart aim, mapped the process, predicted failure modes, and developed a key driver diagram. We identified, tested, and implemented multiple interventions related to role assignment, identification of admitted patients with care gaps, and communication with the inpatient teams. After increasing the reliability of our process to identify and contact the hospital medicine team caring for patients who needed action to 88%, we observed an increase in the preventive care gaps closed from 12% to 41%. A process to help improve preventive care for children can be successfully implemented by using quality improvement methodologies outside of the traditional domains of primary care.

What do Pediatric Hospital Medicine Physicians Want for Professional Development? A Multi-Site Qualitative Analysis at University-Based and Community Hospitals.

What do Pediatric Hospital Medicine Physicians Want for Professional Development? A Multi-Site Qualitative Analysis at University-Based and Community Hospitals.

EStablish And Formalize Expert Criteria for Avoidable Resuscitation Review (SAFECARR) Electronic Delphi: Development of a Consensus Framework for Classifying and Reviewing Cardiac Arrests Within the PICU.

To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of classifying and reviewing pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the PICU. A three-round electronic Delphi consensus study with an additional in-person session with pediatric resuscitation experts. The modified electronic Delphi consisted of survey questions sent to the expert panel with the goals of (1) achieving consensus on definitions of avoidable, potentially avoidable, and unavoidable PICU in-hospital cardiac arrest and (2) achieving consensus and ranking of a list of factors that contribute to potentially avoidable PICU in-hospital cardiac arrest. Electronic surveys of resuscitation experts including pediatric critical care, cardiac critical care, emergency medicine, and hospital medicine physicians, nurses, advance practice nurses, and resuscitation researchers. Not applicable. Not applicable. Over three rounds of an electronic Delphi, 24 resuscitation experts participated. In Round 1, consensus was reached for the definitions of potentially avoidable and unavoidable cardiac arrest. Consensus was not reached for avoidable cardiac arrest. In Round 2, the expert panel agreed with seven factors from the literature and achieved consensus on an additional seven factors. Consensus was achieved on the modified definition of avoidable cardiac arrest. In Round 3, participants were asked to rank the contributing factors in order of their importance. For the in-person session, the consensus definitions and contributing factors from the modified electronic Delphi were presented to a multidisciplinary group of pediatric resuscitation experts and reached consensus for all three definitions. A multidisciplinary group of pediatric resuscitation experts generated a consensus-based framework to classify and review pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the PICU. Future work will focus on the application of this framework and further validation of these definitions and contributing factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest both within and outside the PICU.

Collaboration, Interruptions, and Changeover Times: Workflow Model and Empirical Study of Hospitalist Charting

Problem definition: Collaboration is important in services but may lead to interruptions. Professionals exercise discretion on when to preempt individual tasks to switch to collaborative tasks. Academic/practical relevance: Discretionary task switching can introduce changeover times when resuming the preempted task and, thus, can increase total processing time. Methodology: We analyze and quantify how collaboration, through interruptions and discretionary changeovers, affects total processing time. We introduce an episodal workflow model that captures the interruption and discretionary changeover dynamics—each switch and the episode of work it preempts—present in settings in which collaboration and multitasking is paramount. A simulation study provides evidence that changeover times are properly identified and estimated without bias. We then deploy the model in a field study of hospital medicine physicians: “hospitalists.” The hospitalist workflow includes visiting patients, consulting with other caregivers to guide patient diagnosis and treatment, and documenting in the patient’s medical chart. The empirical analysis uses a data set assembled from direct observation of hospitalist activity and pager-log data. Results: We estimate that a hospitalist incurs a total changeover time during documentation of five minutes per patient per day. Managerial implications: This estimate represents a significant 20% of the total processing time per patient: caring for 14 patients per day, our model estimates that a hospitalist spends more than one hour each day on changeovers. This provides evidence that task switching can causally lead to longer documentation time.

Internal Medicine Student Education on Direct-Care Hospital Medicine Services: Results of a National Survey

Traditionally, internal medicine (IM) inpatient student rotations at clinical sites include teams of students, residents, and an attending physician. With the exponential growth since its relatively recent introduction, hospital medicine has had an expanding and enduring presence in academic medicine. In 2010, the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) Annual Survey found 91.0% of responding programs had students learning under the guidance of hospital medicine physicians.1 Hospital medicine attendings make up a growing portion of IM inpatient teaching faculty and are perceived by trainees as more effective general medicine ward teachers than other medicine or traditional subspecialist attendings.

A Qualitative Study of Increased Pediatric Reutilization After a Postdischarge Home Nurse Visit.

The Hospital to Home Outcomes (H2O) trial was a 2-arm, randomized controlled trial that assessed the effects of a nurse home visit after a pediatric hospital discharge. Children randomized to the intervention had higher 30-day postdischarge reutilization rates compared with those with standard discharge. We sought to understand perspectives on why postdischarge home nurse visits resulted in higher reutilization rates and to elicit suggestions on how to improve future interventions. We sought qualitative input using focus groups and interviews from stakeholder groups: parents, primary care physicians (PCP), hospital medicine physicians, and home care registered nurses (RNs). A multidisciplinary team coded and analyzed transcripts using an inductive, iterative approach. Thirty-three parents participated in interviews. Three focus groups were completed with PCPs (n = 7), 2 with hospital medicine physicians (n = 12), and 2 with RNs (n = 10). Major themes in the explanation of increased reutilization included: appropriateness of patient reutilization; impact of red flags/warning sign instructions on family's reutilization decisions; hospital-affiliated RNs "directing traffic" back to hospital; and home visit RNs had a low threshold for escalating care. Major themes for improving design of the intervention included: need for improved postdischarge communication; individualizing home visits-one size does not fit all; and providing context and framing of red flags. Stakeholders questioned whether hospital reutilization was appropriate and whether the intervention unintentionally directed patients back to the hospital. Future interventions could individualize the visit to specific needs or diagnoses, enhance postdischarge communication, and better connect patients and home nurses to primary care.

Implementation of Febrile Infant Management Guidelines Reduces Hospitalization.

The Model for Improvement was used to implement a CPG for the management of well-appearing febrile infants, with collaboration between pediatric emergency medicine and pediatric hospital medicine physicians. Interventions included physician education, process audit/feedback, and development of an electronic orderset. We used statistical process control charts to assess the primary aims of appropriate risk stratification and length of stay. Over a 34-month period, 168 unique encounters (baseline n = 65, intervention n = 103) were included. There was strong adherence for appropriate risk stratification in both periods: the proportion of low-risk patients admitted inappropriately decreased from 14.8% to 10.8%. Among admitted high-risk patients, the mean length of stay decreased from 49.4 to 38.2 hours, sustained for 18 months. CPG implementation using quality improvement methodology can increase the delivery of evidence-based care for febrile infants, leading to a reduction in length of stay for high-risk infants.

Web Exclusive. Annals for Hospitalists Inpatient Notes - Clinical Pearls-E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury.

This commentary provides clinical pearls for hospital medicine physicians caring for patients who present with symptoms that might indicate vaping-related lung injury.