Hospital Doctors In Ireland Research Articles

Assessing current handover practices in surgery: A survey of non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland

BackgroundHandovers of care are potentially hazardous moments in the patient journey and can lead to harm if conducted poorly. Through a national survey of surgical doctors in Ireland, this paper assesses contemporary surgical handover practices and evaluates barriers and facilitators of effective handover. MethodsAfter ethical approval and pre-testing with a representative sample, a cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs) working in the Republic of Ireland. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining data using triangulation design. Main findingsA total of 201 responses were received (18.5%). Most participants were senior house officers or senior registrars (49.7% and 37.3%). Most people (85.1%) reported that information received during handover was missing or incorrect at least some of the time. One-third of respondents reported that a near-miss had occurred as a result of handover within the past three months, and handover-related errors resulted in minor (16.9%), moderate (4.9%), or major (1.5%) harm. Only 11.4% had received any formal training. Reported barriers to handover included negative attitudes, a lack of institutional support, and competing clinical activities. Facilitators included process standardisation, improved access to resources, and staff engagement. ConclusionsSurgical NCHDs working in Irish hospitals reported poor compliance with international best practice for handover and identified potential harms. Process standardisation, appropriate staff training, and the provision of necessary handover-related resources is required at a national level to address this significant patient safety concern.

AB090. SOH23ABS_218. An audit on post operative extubation practices among non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland

AB090. SOH23ABS_218. An audit on post operative extubation practices among non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland

A catalyst for change: Developing a collaborative reflexive ethnographic approach to research with hospital doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The understanding of what ethnography looks like, and its purpose, is continuously evolving. COVID-19 posed a significant challenge to ethnographers, particularly those working in health-related research. Researchers have developed alternative forms of ethnography to overcome some of these challenges; we developed the Mobile Instant Messaging Ethnography (MIME) adaptation to ethnography in 2021 to overcome restrictions to our own research with hospital doctors. However, for ethnographic innovations to make a substantial contribution to methodology, they should not simply be borne of necessity, but of a dedicated drive to expand paradigms of research, to empower participant groups and to produce change - in local systems, in participant-collaborators and in researchers and the research process itself. In this paper, we reflect on our experiences using MIME, involving collaborative remote observation and reflection with 28 hospital doctors in Ireland from June to December 2021. After reviewing literature on ethnography in COVID-19 and general epistemological developments in ethnography, we detail the MIME approach and illustrate how MIME presents an evolution of the ethnographic approach, not only practically but in terms of its reflexive shift, its connected and co-creative foundations, and its ability to drive change in research approaches, participant life-worlds and real-world improvement.

Hospital doctors in Ireland working through COVID-19 pandemic: learning from individual experience

Abstract Background This study was part of a 5-year, HRB-funded research project about hospital doctor retention and emigration. Methods In 2021, we conducted a Mobile Instant Messaging Ethnography (MIME) with 28 hospital doctors in Ireland. This involved interviewing doctors via Zoom and engaging them in a 12-week work-related conversation via WhatsApp. Results Our findings illustrate that the pandemic intensified already difficult working conditions. Respondents described working in an under-staffed and under-resourced system, in which they were unable to protect their own wellbeing or achieve a work-life balance. Morale was low and few had hope of health system improvement. Conclusions The findings reveal a workforce under strain and raise concerns about health worker wellbeing and health worker attrition, post-pandemic. However, they also highlight the importance (and value) of listening to the voices of frontline health workers and using their insights to inform and enhance retention policies.

172 ‘NCHD’S UNDERSTANDING OF THE ‘DYING WITH DIGNITY BILL”

Abstract Background The Dying with Dignity Bill is potential legislation that would permit terminally ill people to avail of medical assistance to die in certain circumstances. It would give a medical practitioner the legal right to provide assistance to a qualifying person to end their life, thus changing the medical landscape as we know it. This project aimed to assess current understanding in non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs) of the Dying with Dignity Bill. Methods An online survey was distributed to NCHD’s across a range of disciplines to ascertain current knowledge of the Dying with Dignity Bill. Descriptive analysis of data was conducted on Excel. Results The survey was completed by 80 NCHDs. Of respondents 67.5% (n = 54) of respondents had heard of the Bill and 32.5% (n = 26) of them knew what it was. The Bill had not been read by 88% (n = 71) of respondents. Fifty seven per cent (n = 46) did not understand what was entailed in the Bill. The majority agreed (61.3%; n = 49) that it would impact their work as a clinician. Some 70.1% (n = 56) agreed that legislation was needed in this area. The majority answered neutral (45%; n = 35) that their profession were consulted in the creation of the Bill. It is believed that the Bill will not require a vote however 48% (n = 37) believed it would. However, the majority (72.7%, n = 56) answered correctly that the Bill had not been enacted yet. This Bill does not define the length of a ‘terminal illness’ yet 36.8% (n = 28) believed it to be within six months. It also states that it is the practitioner’s role to decide when somebody is palliative and only 54.5% (n = 42) knew this. Conclusion The Dying with Dignity Bill is poorly understood by NCHDs, despite it potentially having an impact on the role of hospital doctors in Ireland. Discussion and involvement of NCHD’s in the potential formation of this Bill is crucial.

249 A SURVEY OF IRISH DOCTORS VIEWS ON FLEXIBLE TRAINING

Abstract Background We aimed to establish the views of non consultant hospital doctors working in Ireland on the options available for ‘Flexible Training’ or ‘Less-Than-Full-Time-Training’. Our population is ageing rapidly, and an expanding workforce will be required. Difficulties with doctor retention and recruitment are growing challenges in Ireland. Methods An anonymised survey of 9 questions was carried out using Survey Monkey®. Question format included multiple choice, yes/no or a free text box. This was disseminated via the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland to 1,557 trainees of the Institute of Medicine, the national postgraduate body for medical specialties. It was also circulated to members of the Irish Medical Organisation, the national medical organisation, and to approximately 200 doctors across two hospitals on social media. Results There were 674 (84.3%) respondents in training- 46.3% BST, 53.7% HST; and 125 (15.6%) non-training respondents. Doctors overwhelmingly felt trainees should have access to flexible training (n = 849, 99.41%), with 82.39% reporting they would apply (n = 702). Most (92.5%) felt that 16 WTE positions was inadequate (n = 789). Reasons chosen for not applying for flexible training included- 36.1% (n = 169) felt it could impact their career, 25.4% (n = 119) identified they did not meet the criteria, 14.32% (n = 67) reported no interest, while 24.1% (n = 113) gave ‘other’ reasons including lengthy training, salary impacts, and not having a requirement for flexible training. When asked about suggestions for improving flexible training, 19.7% chose ‘offer more places’, 6.7%-‘remove eligibility criteria’, 19.6% -‘offer job sharing options’, 9.5%- ‘allow more flexible training years’, 17.7% -‘regional based training’, 22.5% -‘all of the above’, 4.9%—‘other’. Conclusion Our survey suggests non consultant hospital doctors in Ireland strongly desire an expansion of current flexible training options. This is essential to ensure Ireland is an attractive place for doctors to work, to support their health and wellbeing, and to ensure an adequate workforce to care for an ageing population.

‘…the way it was staffed during COVID is the way it should be staffed in real life…’: a qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 on the working conditions of junior hospital doctors

ObjectivesCOVID-19 has prompted the reconfiguration of hospital services and medical workforces in countries across the world, bringing significant transformations to the work environments of hospital doctors. Before the pandemic, the...

"I feel I have no voice": hospital doctors' workplace silence in Ireland.

Workplace silence impedes productivity, job satisfaction and retention, key issues for the hospital workforce worldwide. It can have a negative effect on patient outcomes and safety and human resources in healthcare organisations. This study aims to examine factors that influence workplace silence among hospital doctors in Ireland. A national, cross-sectional, online survey of hospital doctors in Ireland was conducted in October-November 2019; 1,070 hospital doctors responded. This paper focuses on responses to the question "If you had concerns about your working conditions, would you raise them?". In total, 227 hospital doctor respondents (25%) stated that they would not raise concerns about their working conditions. Qualitative thematic analysis was carried out on free-text responses to explore why these doctors choose to opt for silence regarding their working conditions. Reputational risk, lack of energy and time, a perceived inability to effect change and cultural norms all discourage doctors from raising concerns about working conditions. Apathy arose as change to working conditions was perceived as highly unlikely. In turn, this had scope to lead to neglect and exit. Voice was seen as risky for some respondents, who feared that complaining could damage their career prospects and workplace relationships. This study highlights the systemic, cultural and practical issues that pressure hospital doctors in Ireland to opt for silence around working conditions. It adds to the literature on workplace silence and voice within the medical profession and provides a framework for comparative analysis of doctors' silence and voice in other settings.

COVID-19 and doctor emigration: the case of Ireland

BackgroundSince the 2008 recession, Ireland has experienced large-scale doctor emigration. This paper seeks to ascertain whether (and how) the COVID-19 pandemic might disrupt or reinforce existing patterns of doctor emigration.MethodThis paper draws on qualitative interviews with 31 hospital doctors in Ireland, undertaken in June–July 2020. As the researchers were subject to a government mandated work-from-home order at that time, they utilised Twitter™ to contact potential respondents (snowball sampling); and conducted interviews via Zoom™ or telephone.FindingsTwo cohorts of doctors were identified; COVID Returners (N = 12) and COVID Would-be Emigrants (N = 19). COVID Returners are Irish-trained emigrant doctors who returned to Ireland in March 2020, just as global travel ground to a halt. They returned to be closer to home and in response to a pandemic-related recruitment call issued by the Irish government. COVID Would-be Emigrants are hospital doctors considering emigration. Some had experienced pandemic-related disruptions to their emigration plans as a result of travel restrictions and border closures. However, most of the drivers of emigration mentioned by respondents related to underlying problems in the Irish health system rather than to the pandemic, i.e. a culture of medical emigration, poor working conditions and the limited availability of posts in the Irish health system.Discussion/conclusionThis paper illustrates how the pandemic intensified and reinforced, rather than radically altered, the dynamics of doctor emigration from Ireland. Ireland must begin to prioritise doctor retention and return by developing a coherent policy response to the underlying drivers of doctor emigration.

Hospital doctors in Ireland and the struggle for work-life balance.

Ireland has a high rate of doctor emigration. Challenging working conditions and poor work–life balance, particularly in the hospital sector, are often cited as a driver. The aim of this study was to obtain insight into hospital doctors’ experiences of work and of work–life balance. In late 2019, a stratified random sample of hospital doctors participated in an anonymous online survey, distributed via the national Medical Register (overall response rate 20%; n = 1070). This article presents a qualitative analysis of free-text questions relating to working conditions (n = 469) and work–life balance (n = 314). Results show that respondent hospital doctors, at all levels of seniority, were struggling to achieve balance between work and life, with work–life imbalance and work overload being the key issues arising. Work–life imbalance has become normalized within Irish hospital medicine. Drawing on insights from respondent hospital doctors, this study reflects on the sustainability of this way of working for the individual doctors, the medical workforce and the Irish health system. If health workforce planning is about getting the right staff with the right skills in the right place at the right time to deliver care, work–life balance is about maintaining doctor wellbeing and encouraging their retention.

Storytelling and poetry in the time of coronavirus.

The coronavirus crisis occurs at a time when many clinicians have already experienced burnout. One in three Irish doctors were suffering from burnout in the 2019 National Study of Wellbeing of Hospital Doctors in Ireland; rates are also high in Irish Psychiatry. We present a perspective on the use of narrative in medicine and recognise that storytelling, and the patient history are very much at the heart of medicine. Clinician storytelling, such as Schwartz Rounds and Balint group work, has very much come to the fore in Irish Psychiatry and in training. Projects such as MindReading have explored overlaps between clinicians, humanities experts and experts by experience. We give an overview of some approaches from the movement around narrative in medicine to bolster this. We explore why clinicians write as ways to support identification, catharsis and a way to process experiences. Clinicians and patients may also use literature and poetry to promote coping. The historical context and practical strategies are highlighted, particularly with reference to poetry use during the current crisis.

Doctors don’t Do-little: a national cross-sectional study of workplace well-being of hospital doctors in Ireland

ObjectivesTo measure levels of occupational stress, burn-out, work–life balance, presenteeism, work ability (balance between work and personal resources) and desire to practise in trainee and consultant hospital doctors in Ireland.DesignNational...

\u201cDo as we say, not as we do?\u201d the lifestyle behaviours of hospital doctors working in Ireland: a national cross-sectional study

BackgroundThis study was conducted to assess the lifestyle behaviours of a national sample of hospital doctors working in Ireland. We also sought to compare the prevalence of these behaviours in doctors to the general Irish population.MethodsThis was a national cross-sectional study of a randomised sample of hospital doctors working in Irish publicly funded hospitals and residential institutions. The final cohort consisted of 1749 doctors (response rate of 55%). All hospital specialties were represented except radiology. The following data were collected: sociodemographic data (age, sex), work grade (consultant, trainee) average hours worked over a two-week period, specialty and lifestyle behaviours (smoking, alcohol, physical activity). Lifestyle data for the general population was provided by the Healthy Ireland 2015 study.ResultsHalf of participants were men (50.5%). Just over half of the sample were consultants (54.3%), with 45.7% being trainees. 9.3% of doctors surveyed were smokers, 88.4% consumed alcohol and 24.5% were physically inactive. Trainees were more likely to smoke and be physically inactive when compared to consultants. Smoking rates amongst doctors were lower than the general population (9.3% -v- 23%). Doctors were more likely to consume alcohol than the general population (88.4% -v- 71.7%) but less likely to engage in binge drinking on a typical drinking occasion (12.8% -v- 39.5%). Doctors were more compliant than the general population with minimum exercise targets (75.5% -v- 70.5%), but less likely to engage in health enhancing physical activity (19.1% -v- 33%).ConclusionsWhile the prevalence of health behaviours amongst hospital doctors in Ireland compares favourably to the general population, their alcohol consumption and engagement in health enhancing physical activity suggest room for improvement. Continued health promotion and education on the importance of personal health behaviours is essential.

What’s up doc? A national cross-sectional study of psychological wellbeing of hospital doctors in Ireland

ObjectivesTo measure levels of psychological distress, psychological wellbeing and self-stigma in hospital doctors in Ireland.DesignNational cross-sectional study of randomised sample of hospital doctors. Participants provided sociodemographic data (age, sex, marital...

Continuing professional development and Irish hospital doctors: a survey of current use and future needs

Doctors rate clinical relevance and applicability as the most important determinants of continuing professional development (CPD) course selection. This study examined patterns of current CPD practice and perceived CPD needs among hospital doctors in Ireland across various clinical specialties. A cross-sectional survey was administered to doctors, focusing on the areas of training needs analysis, CPD course content and preferred course format. In total, 547 doctors identified doctor-patient communication as the skill ranked highest for importance and level of current performance. Workload/time organisation and stress management were areas where a skills deficiency was identified. Non-clinical CPD topics, including resilience training, management and communication skills, were preferred areas for future CPD offerings. All respondents favoured interactive, hands-on sessions. CPD course completion and preference patterns differed significantly across clinical specialties. These results highlight the importance of considering the individual needs and preferences of clinicians across clinical specialties to facilitate more effective CPD programmes.

Burnout syndrome among non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland: relationship with self-reported patient care.

Intensive workload and limited training opportunities for Irish non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs) has a negative effect on their health and well-being, and can result in burnout. Burnout affects physician performance and can lead to medical errors. This study examined the prevalence of burnout syndrome among Irish NCHDs and its association with self-reported medical error and poor quality of patient care. A cross-sectional quantitative survey-based design. All teaching hospitals affiliated with University College Cork. NCHDs of all grades and specialties. The following instruments were completed by all participants: Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS), assessing three categories of burnout syndrome: Emotional exhaustion (EE), Personal Achievement (PA) and Depersonalization (DP); questions related to self-reported medical errors/poor patient care quality and socio-demographic information. Self-reported measures of burnout and poor quality of patient care. Prevalence of burnout among physicians (n = 265) was 26.4%. There was a significant gender difference for EE and DP, but none for PA. A positive weak correlation was observed between EE and DP with medical error or poor patient care. A negative association was reported between PA and medical error and reduced quality of patient care. Burnout is prevalent among NCHDs in Ireland. Burnout syndrome is associated with self-reported medical error and quality of care in this sample population. Measures need to be taken to address this issue, with a view to protecting health of NCHDs and maintaining quality of patient care.

Doctors' attitudes towards the introduction and clinical operation of do not resuscitate orders (DNRs) in Ireland.

Do not resuscitate orders (DNRs) are documents which state that should a patient suffer from cardiopulmonary failure, resuscitation should not be attempted. Internationally, DNRs are often misunderstood and used inappropriately in a clinical setting. The aim of this paper was to determine the current understanding of DNRs and their clinical operation among hospital doctors in Ireland. A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted involving doctors from the Cork teaching hospitals. The questionnaire sought information regarding understanding of DNRs and their clinical operation, as well as attitudes regarding the current absence of relevant Irish guidelines. The questionnaire also collected information regarding demographics, clinical specialty, and level of experience. 45.9% (47/103) of all doctors stated that their clinical knowledge was sufficient to draft a DNR, but 48.7% of this group (n=23) chose the incorrect definition for a DNR when provided with three separate options. Thirty-five percent (n=36) of all doctors surveyed demonstrated an incorrect understanding of a DNR. Neither specialty nor experience level had any effect on level of understanding of DNRs (p>0.05). 93.2% (n=96) agreed that there is a need for introduction of domestic guidelines regarding DNRs. 57.6% (n=59) would draft more DNRs in the event that such domestic guidelines were in place. A substantial proportion of hospital doctors surveyed demonstrated an incomplete understanding of DNRs and their clinical operation. However, the overwhelming majority of the present sample believe that domestic guidelines are needed on the matter.

A study to investigate the factors that influence the prescribing habits of non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland.

The Health Service Executive estimates it spent just under €2 billion on medicines in 2013 following a fivefold increase in the cost of medicines over the preceding decade. With this increasing cost, it is important to understand what factors affect doctors prescribing. To investigate the influencing factors on prescribing of non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs) in Irish hospitals and to provide data regarding the sources of information NCHD's use for commonly prescribed drugs. All medical manpower offices of adult public hospitals in the Republic of Ireland were emailed with our survey for distribution to NCHDs. It contained demographic information and questions regarding factors which most influence their prescribing of particular drug groups. Tests of significance were carried out using Chi-square. One hundred and seventy-nine surveys were returned out of a possible 8987 (0.02%). Consultant preference was the biggest overall influencing factor on junior doctors prescribing (27%). This was closely followed by local departmental policies (26%). Evidence-based prescribing only influenced 14% of the total prescribing of NCHDs with the pharmaceutical representative influence only a fraction behind (13%). Knowledge obtained during medical school greater influenced postgraduate prescribing than undergraduate (34 vs 14%, p=0.046). Registrars were significantly more likely to prescribe using evidence-based medicine than intern and SHOs (p=0.03). The prescription of medications in Ireland by NCHDs varies greatly depending not only on drug group, but it is also affected by the doctors' previous education and experience. This information is key in leading to sensible cost-effective prescribing.

Quality care, public perception and quick-fix service management: a Delphi study on stressors of hospital doctors in Ireland

ObjectivesTo identify and rank the most significant workplace stressors to which consultants and trainees are exposed within the publicly funded health sector in Ireland.DesignFollowing a preliminary semistructured telephone interview, a...

Non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland; A survey of satisfaction in training

Non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland; A survey of satisfaction in training