Hospital-acquired Pressure Injuries Research Articles

Implementable Prediction of Pressure Injuries in Hospitalized Adults: Model Development and Validation.

Numerous pressure injury prediction models have been developed using electronic health record data, yet hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) are increasing, which demonstrates the critical challenge of implementing these models in routine care. To help bridge the gap between development and implementation, we sought to create a model that was feasible, broadly applicable, dynamic, actionable, and rigorously validated and then compare its performance to usual care (ie, the Braden scale). We extracted electronic health record data from 197,991 adult hospital admissions with 51 candidate features. For risk prediction and feature selection, we used logistic regression with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approach. To compare the model with usual care, we used the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), Brier score, slope, intercept, and integrated calibration index. The model was validated using a temporally staggered cohort. A total of 5458 HAPIs were identified between January 2018 and July 2022. We determined 22 features were necessary to achieve a parsimonious and highly accurate model. The top 5 features included tracheostomy, edema, central line, first albumin measure, and age. Our model achieved higher discrimination than the Braden scale (AUC 0.897, 95% CI 0.893-0.901 vs AUC 0.798, 95% CI 0.791-0.803). We developed and validated an accurate prediction model for HAPIs that surpassed the standard-of-care risk assessment and fulfilled necessary elements for implementation. Future work includes a pragmatic randomized trial to assess whether our model improves patient outcomes.

Regional Transformation: An Integrated System's Approach to Magnet Designation Utilizing High-Reliability Organization Implementation Strategies.

Synergistic opportunity exists between Magnet-aspiring environments and High Reliability Organization (HRO) cultures to elevate safety, quality, new knowledge, continuous improvement, hierarchical flattening, and frontline empowerment. Variation existed across a region's 15 hospitals regarding Magnet-readiness, leadership engagement, journey strategies, and resource capacity. Quality improvement (QI) methodology and a hybrid-hub-spoke-model (HHSM) were used to support region-wide Magnet designation, improve patient outcomes, and advance nursing research. HRO strategies were used region-wide to strengthen implementation and enculturation of Magnet excellence infrastructure. Nine facilities achieved Magnet recognition. Magnet sites demonstrated significantly lower falls with injury (P =.012), lower health care-associated infections and hospital-acquired pressure injuries than non-Magnet sites. Nursing research studies increased 223%. Utilizing a HHSM and HRO strategies represent effective methods for supporting region-wide Magnet designation and continuous QI.

Predicting pressure injury risk in hospitalised patients using machine learning with electronic health records: a US multilevel cohort study

ObjectiveTo predict the risk of hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning compared with standard care.DesignWe obtained electronic health records (EHRs) to structure a multilevel cohort of hospitalised patients at risk...

Hospital-acquired pressure injury: our seven years of experience.

A pressure injury (PI) happens on the skin and in deeper tissues. Generally, it occurs due to prolonged compression over bony structures. A PI, when occurring during a hospital stay, is regarded as a hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI), and is considered as a marker for patient care quality. It might cause medical, legal or economic problems, and could be a burden on health systems. In this study we evaluate the factors contributing to HAPI formation. Between June 2014-June 2021, we retrospectively investigated the files of patients who were hospitalised with different medical conditions in Bayindir Sögütözü Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, for patients' age, sex, Waterlow scale score, mobilisation status, application of zinc-containing and/or barrier creams (ZnBC), airbed usage, hospitalisation period, and the day of wound opening. The study cohort comprised 2327 hospitalised patients: 303 (13%) developed Stage 2 and deeper PIs; 2024 patients were hospitalised and discharged without wound opening. We found an increased risk in male patients and a lack of efficacy of ZnBC in protection from HAPI in our study population. However, we observed that ZnBC helped to delay wound opening and that the most protective treatment was the use of airbeds. Health professionals should be more aware of HAPI formation with prolonged hospitalisation periods. Only the use of an airbed for a patient hospitalised for a long period appears to be protective against PI formation. On the other hand, use of ZnBC delays wound opening. However, further research is needed to demonstrate the protective effect of ZnBC, due to the lack of randomisation in our study and the lack of some nursing records.

Increasing Pressure Reliefs and Decreasing Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries through a Therapy-Nursing Education Program

Increasing Pressure Reliefs and Decreasing Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries through a Therapy-Nursing Education Program

A HAPI prevention program: Eliminating hospital-acquired pressure injuries with four eyes.

A HAPI prevention program: Eliminating hospital-acquired pressure injuries with four eyes.

Impact of pressure injury education on nurses’ knowledge in an acute care setting

This research study investigated the profound physical, social, and psychological effects of pressure injuries on individuals. Despite ongoing efforts, hospital-acquired pressure injuries remain prevalent, with up to seventy percent deemed preventable. The study, which involved 40 nurses, employed the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT) 2.0 to assess the impact of an educational workshop on nurses' knowledge. Statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in PUKAT 2.0 scores post-education (p < .001, r = .61), aligning with existing literature emphasizing the positive effect of education on nurses' knowledge of pressure injuries.

Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries and predictors of severity in a paediatric hospital.

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) pose significant challenges in healthcare and cause increased patient suffering, longer hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Paediatric patients face unique risks, but evidence remains scarce. This study aimed to identify and describe HAPI admission incidence and severity predictors in a large Australian children's hospital. This retrospective cohort study investigated all paediatric patients between January 2020 and December 2021 using a census approach. Demographic and clinical data including HAPI-related data were accessed from the incident monitoring and hospital administration databases. The incidence rate (per 1000 patient admissions) was calculated based on all admissions. Predictors of HAPI severity were identified using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. The study adhered to the STROBE guidelines for retrospective cohort studies. The HAPI incidence rate was 6.96 per 1000 patient admissions. Of the age groups, neonates had the highest HAPI incidence (15.5 per 1000 admissions). Critically ill children had the highest rate for admission location (12.8 per 1000 patient admissions). Most reported cases were stage I (64.2%). Age was associated with injury severity, with older paediatric patients more likely to develop higher-stage HAPIs. Additionally, Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander patients had a higher HAPI severity risk. HAPI injuries in paediatric patients are unacceptably high. Prevention should be prioritized, and the quality of care improved in Australia and beyond. Further research is needed to develop targeted prevention strategies for these vulnerable populations. This research emphasizes the need for standardized reporting, culturally sensitive care and tailored prevention strategies. The research has the potential to influence healthcare policies and practices, ultimately enhancing the quality of patient care. STROBE guidelines. There was no patient or public contribution to the conduct of this study.

Original Research: Breaking Through the Bottleneck: Acuity Adaptability in Noncritical Trauma Care.

Achieving efficient throughput of patients is a challenge faced by many hospital systems. Factors that can impede efficient throughput include increased ED use, high surgical volumes, lack of available beds, and the complexities of coordinating multiple patient transfers in response to changing care needs. Traditionally, many hospital inpatient units operate via a fixed acuity model, relying on multiple intrahospital transfers to move patients along the care continuum. In contrast, the acuity-adaptable model allows care to occur in the same room despite fluctuations in clinical condition, removing the need for transfer. This model has been shown to be a safe and cost-effective approach to improving throughput in populations with predictable courses of hospitalization, but has been minimally evaluated in other populations, such as patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate implementation of an acuity-adaptable model on a 20-bed noncritical trauma unit. Specifically, we sought to examine and compare the pre- and postimplementation metrics for throughput efficiency, resource utilization, and nursing quality indicators; and to determine the model's impact on patient transfers for changes in level of care. This was a retrospective, comparative analysis of 1,371 noncritical trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center before and after the implementation of an acuity-adaptable model. Outcomes of interest included throughput efficiency, resource utilization, and quality of nursing care. Inferential statistics were used to compare patients pre- and postimplementation, and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of the acuity-adaptable model on patient transfers. Postimplementation, the median ED boarding time was reduced by 6.2 hours, patients more often remained in their assigned room following a change in level of care, more progressive care patient days occurred, fall and hospital-acquired pressure injury index rates decreased respectively by 0.9 and 0.3 occurrences per 1,000 patient days, and patients were more often discharged to home. Logistic regression analyses revealed that under the new model, patients were more than nine times more likely to remain in the same room for care after a change in acuity and 81.6% less likely to change rooms after a change in acuity. An increase of over $11,000 in average daily bed charges occurred postimplementation as a result of increased progressive care-level bed capacity. The implementation of an acuity-adaptable model on a dedicated noncritical trauma unit improved throughput efficiency and resource utilization without sacrificing quality of care. As hospitals continue to face increasing demand for services as well as numerous barriers to meeting such demand, leaders remain challenged to find innovative ways to optimize operational efficiency and resource utilization while ensuring delivery of high-quality care. The findings of this study demonstrate the value of the acuity-adaptable model in achieving these goals in a noncritical trauma care population.

Differential effects of electronic patient record systems for wound care on hospital-acquired pressure injuries: Findings from a secondary analysis of German hospital data

IntroductionDespite the improvements made in recent decades, the OECD regards hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) as high priority areas for actions to ensure patient safety. This study was aimed at investigating the degree of utilization of two types of electronic patient record systems for wound care on lowering HAPI rates. Furthermore, the effect of user satisfaction with the systems and perceived alignment with clinical processes should be studied. Material and methodsA regression analysis of post-stratified data from German hospitals obtained from the Hospital Quality Reports (observed/expected HAPI ratio) and the IT Report Healthcare was performed. The sample comprised 319 hospitals reporting on digital wound record systems and 199 hospitals on digital nursing record systems for system utilization and the subset of hospitals using a digital system for user satisfaction and process alignment. ResultsThe study revealed a significant effect of hospital ownership for both types of systems and a significant interaction of ownership and system utilization for digital wound record systems: Only the for-profit hospitals benefited from a higher degree of system utilization with a lower HAPI ratio. In contrast, non-profit hospitals yielded a reversed pattern, with increasing HAPI rates matching an increased system utilization. User satisfaction (significant) and the perceived alignment of the clinical process (trend) of the digital nursing record system were related with lower HAPI ratios. DiscussionThese findings point to a differential effect of system utilization on HAPI ratios depending on hospital ownership, and they demonstrate that those users who are satisfied with the system can act as catalysts for better care. The explained variance was small but comparable to other studies. Furthermore, it shows that explaining quality care is a complex undertaking. Sheer utilization has no effect while a differential perspective on the facilitators and barriers might help to explain the patient outcomes.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Rates of Pressure Injuries Among Hospitalized Patients across the US.

To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) rates and composition of HAPI stages among hospitalized patients across the US. Using encounter-level data from a nationwide healthcare insurance claims database, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study and an interrupted time-series analysis to determine HAPI rates among hospitalized patients within 90 days of admission before (January 2018 to February 2020) and after (March 2020 to December 2020) the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of 3,418,438 adult patients assessed for inclusion in the study, 1,750,494 met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes measured included the presence of a HAPI within 90 days of admission and HAPI stage based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis codes. The authors identified HAPIs in 59,175 episodes of care, representing 59,019 unique patients and corresponding to an overall HAPI rate of 2.65%. Baseline characteristics did not vary significantly across the two time periods. Further, HAPI rates were consistent across the time periods analyzed with no significant differences in rates following the onset of the pandemic (P = .303). Composition of HAPI stages remained consistent across the pandemic (unspecified, stages 1-4, Ps = .62, .80, .22, .23, and .52, respectively) except for a significant decrease in unstageable/deep tissue pressure injuries (-0.088%, P = .0134). Although hospital resources were strained at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, no differences were identified in HAPI rates among the study's cohort of privately insured patients.

Evaluating Natural Language Processing Packages for Predicting Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries From Clinical Notes.

Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury, a key indicator of nursing quality, is directly proportional to adverse outcomes, increased hospital stays, and economic burdens on patients, caregivers, and society. Thus, predicting hospital-acquired pressure injury is important. Prediction models use structured data more often than unstructured notes, although the latter often contain useful patient information. We hypothesize that unstructured notes, such as nursing notes, can predict hospital-acquired pressure injury. We evaluate the impact of using various natural language processing packages to identify salient patient information from unstructured text. We use named entity recognition to identify keywords, which comprise the feature space of our classifier for hospital-acquired pressure injury prediction. We compare scispaCy and Stanza, two different named entity recognition models, using unstructured notes in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III, a publicly available ICU data set. To assess the impact of vocabulary size reduction, we compare the use of all clinical notes with only nursing notes. Our results suggest that named entity recognition extraction using nursing notes can yield accurate models. Moreover, the extracted keywords play a significant role in the prediction of hospital-acquired pressure injury.

Hematologic and Serum Biochemical Values Associated With Different Stages of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Patients: A Retrospective Study.

The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether hematologic and serum biochemical values used as indicators of nutritional status, anemia, and/or infection were associated with the risk of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (PIs) and stage of PIs in patients. A retrospective review of medical records. Data were collected from medical records including official PI records and PI incident reports of inpatients at a teaching hospital in Taiwan between January 2019 and October 2020. We collected demographic variables of the inpatients and their hematologic and serum biochemical values within 1 day of PI occurrence (including the day of PI occurrence), 6 to 7 days before PI occurrence, and 13 to 14 days before PI occurrence. Among the 309 inpatients with official PI records, 105 (34.0%) had Stage 1 PIs, 131 (42.4%) had Stage 2 or 3 PIs, and 73 (23.6%) had unstageable or suspected deep tissue injuries. After controlling for the type of department where PIs occurred and length of hospital stay up to the day of PI occurrence, we found significant differences in levels of hemoglobin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, P = .009) within 1 day of PI occurrence and in albumin (OR = 0.30, P = .001) 13 to 14 days before PI occurrence. Study findings suggest that lower hemoglobin levels on the day of PI occurrence and lower albumin levels 2 weeks before PI occurrence resulted in a significantly higher risk of developing unstageable or suspected deep tissue injuries than of developing Stage 1 PIs.

Prevalence of pressure injury on the medical wards of public general hospitals in Kuwait: a national cross-sectional study

BackgroundPressure injury is a severe problem that can significantly impact a patient’s health, quality of life, and healthcare expenses. The prevalence of pressure injuries is a widely used clinical indicator of patient safety and quality of care. This study aims to address the research gap that exists on this topic in Kuwait by investigating the prevalence of pressure injuries and preventive measures on the medical wards of the country’s public general hospitals.MethodsA cross-sectional research design was adopted to measure the point prevalence of pressure injuries on 54 medical wards in the public general hospitals. Data, including variables pertaining to hospitals, patients, pressure injuries and preventive practices, were collected using an online form. The data were processed and analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 23 (α level = 0.05). Analysis provided an overview of patient, pressure injury characteristics and preventive measures, and the relationships between the patient and pressure injury characteristics and the prevalence of pressure injuries. A model for predicting the determinants of pressure injury prevalence was constructed from a linear regression analysis.ResultsThe mean national prevalence of pressure injury was 17.6% (95% CI: 11.3–23.8). Purely community-acquired pressure injuries represent the majority of pressure injuries nationally (58.1%). Regarding preventive measures, “pressure injury assessment on admission” has been provided to 65.5% of patients. Correlation analysis revealed that the only statistically significant correlation with the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury was “pressure injury assessment on admission”, which was strongly negative (ρ = −0.857). Therefore, this was the only variable included in the regression analysis as a predictor of pressure injury prevalence (Beta = 0.839). The results showed many statistically significant differences between hospitals with respect to the variables studied.ConclusionsThe national pressure injury prevalence is high compared to the global rate. The higher percentage of purely community-acquired pressure injuries requires particular attention. Many risk factors for the development of pressure injuries are public health concerns, and effective mitigating strategies are needed. Further research is required to assess the knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of nurses with respect to pressure injuries, and to evaluate preventive and management practices.

Abstract WP36: Proven Strategies for Educating Staff and Reducing Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Stroke Hospital Units

Introduction: Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries (HAPI) are preventable complications that stroke patients are at risk for developing during hospitalization due to changes in mobility, nutrition, and continence as complications of stroke. The stroke units at a large teaching hospital saw an increase in HAPI’s during fiscal years (FY) 21 and 22 with 16 collective HAPIs in FY21 and 25 in FY22. Additionally, 12.5% of their unit-acquired HAPIs were reportable to the state’s Department of Public Health (DPH) in FY21 and 20% were reportable to the DPH in FY22. Nursing leadership hypothesized that a multi-year and multi-faceted plan would reduce unit-acquired HAPIs. Methods: In the first year of the plan, all RNs and Patient Care Assistants (PCAs) participated in a “Room of Wounds” education intervention in which they identified HAPI prevention errors in a simulation, matched appropriate dressings to wound images according to hospital policy, identified documentation gaps in a mock medical record, and completed a case study in which they applied the hospital’s Skin Injury Prevention Protocol (SIPP) to a patient scenario. The following year, the RNs all reviewed a handout on the hospital’s SIPP which included “Do’s and Don’ts” of documentation and participated in a Skills Day where an educational game was utilized identify wounds and appropriate dressing types. Additionally, unit leadership completed daily audits and provided timely feedback to RNs about patient care and documentation gaps. Results: Together, the neuroscience units saw a 48% reduction in HAPIs from FY22 to FY23 thus far with one of the units seeing a 71% reduction. In addition, none of the neuroscience units had a DPH reportable HAPI in FY23 thus far. Conclusion: Multi-faceted education approaches are critical when implementing education to counteract gaps in nursing care because they ensure that all learner types receive meaningful education. Consistent Auditing and feedback also improves patient care and staff accountability. A multi-faceted approach is a successful strategy that can be utilized when providing education about HAPI prevention, a major risk to patients after stroke, to staff members of multiple roles within the hospital’s stroke units.

Improving hip fracture care: A five-year review of the early contributors to the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry.

The aim of this study was to examine temporal trends (2016-2020) in hip fracture care in Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) hospitals that started providing patient-level data to the ANZ Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) on/before 1 January 2016 (early contributors). Retrospective cohort study of early contributor hospitals (n = 24) to the ANZHFR. The study cohort included patients aged ≥50 years admitted with a low trauma hip fracture between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020 (n = 26,937). Annual performance against 11 quality indicators and 30- and 365-day mortality were examined. Compared to 2016/2017, year-on-year improvements were demonstrated for preoperative cognitive assessment (2020: OR 3.57, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.29-3.87) and nerve block use prior to surgery (2020: OR 4.62, 95% CI 4.17-5.11). Less consistent improvements over time from 2016/2017 were demonstrated for emergency department (ED) stay of <4 h (2017; 2020), pain assessment ≤30 min of ED presentation (2020), surgery ≤48 h (2020) and bone protection medication prescribed on discharge (2017-2020; 2020 OR 2.22, 95% CI 2.03-2.42). The odds of sustaining a hospital-acquired pressure injury increased in 2019-2020 compared to 2016. The odds of receiving an orthogeriatric model of care and being offered the opportunity to mobilise on Day 1 following surgery fluctuated. There was a reduction in 365-day mortality in 2020 compared to 2016 (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.98), whereas 30-day mortality did not change. Several quality indicators improved over time in early contributor hospitals. Indicators that did not improve may be targets for future care improvement activities, including considering incentivised hip fracture care, which has previously been shown to improve care/outcomes. COVID-19 and reporting practices may have impacted the study findings.

Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in intensive care units of the Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundHospital-acquired pressure injuries are a major patient safety concern in intensive care units that are considered largely preventable adverse events by adherence to nursing standards of care. The hypothesis of this research was to investigate the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in intensive care units (ICUs) of the Eastern Mediterranean Region.MethodsThis study was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis. All articles published on Pressure ulcer prevalence in the ICUs of hospitals in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries, identified by searching PubMed through MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2011, until September 22, 2023. The reference lists of these articles were checked for additional relevant studies. Data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (v.2.2.064).ResultsA total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the random-effects model, the overall Pressure ulcer prevalence rate was 16.6% (95% CI (8.6-29.6)). Both the highest and lowest prevalence was observed in Jordan in 2011 at 83.1% (95% CI (71.2- 90.7)) and in 2012 at 0.9% (95% CI (0.5- 1.5)), respectively. The results showed that publication year, average age, and sample size were the main causes of heterogeneity between the reviewed studies (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent peer-reviewed literature revealed a high prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries of 16% in intensive care units of Eastern Mediterranean region. Therefore, it is necessary for health policymakers and managers in Eastern Mediterranean Region to take necessary measures to prevent the incidence of Pressure ulcers in hospitals, especially in ICUs.

Shedding new light for nurses: Enhancing pressure injury prevention across skin tones with sub-epidermal moisture assessment technology.

To assess the effectiveness of sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) assessment technology in the detection of early-stage pressure damage in a critical care unit (CCU) and dark skin tone patients and its impact on hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) incidence. Quality improvement study employing Kurt Lewin's change model emphasizing planning, implementation, evaluation and sustainable change. The study evaluated 140 adult patients admitted to the CCU over a 24-week period, from July to December 2022. Retrospective analysis of standard PI care pathways was performed in 90 patients admitted during a 12-week pre-implementation period. Fifty patients were admitted through the subsequent 12-week implementation period. SEM assessments were performed daily at the sacrum and heels and interventions were applied based on SEM assessments; SEM delta ≥0.6 indicating localized oedema or persistent focal oedema. Statistical analyses were performed on anonymized data. Pre-implementation HAPI incidence was 8.9% (N = 8/90). All eight patients were African American with varying skin tones. A 100% reduction in HAPI incidence was achieved in the implementation period which included 35 African American patients. The relative risk of HAPI incidence was 1.6 times higher in the pre-implementation group. Implementing SEM assessment technology enabled equitable PI care for all population types and resulted in a 100% reduction of PIs in our CCU. Objective SEM assessments detected early-stage PIs, regardless of skin tone and enabled providing interventions to specific anatomies developing tissue damage as opposed to universal preventive interventions. PI care pathways relying on visual and tactile skin assessments are inherently biased in providing equitable care for dark skin tone patients. Implementing SEM assessments empowers healthcare practitioners in driving objective clinical interventions, eliminates bias and enables positive PI health outcomes. Implementing SEM assessment technology had three main effects: it detected early tissue damage regardless of skin tone (detection effect), enabled anatomy-specific interventions (treatment effect) and prevented PIs across all population types (prevention effect). The authors have adhered to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 guidelines. No patient or public contribution. What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community? Addressing health inequities in pressure injury prevention; Demonstrated effectiveness across patient populations; Resource optimization and enhanced patient safety.

Preventing hospital-acquired pressure injuries

A project aimed at closing the nurse knowledge gap leads to positive results.

Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in intensive care units of the Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundHospital-acquired pressure injuries are a major patient safety concern in intensive care units that are considered largely preventable adverse events by adherence to nursing standards of care. The hypothesis of this research was to investigate the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in intensive care units (ICUs) of the Eastern Mediterranean Region.MethodsThis study was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis. All articles published on Pressure ulcer prevalence in the ICUs of hospitals in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries, identified by searching PubMed through MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2011, until September 22, 2023. The reference lists of these articles were checked for additional relevant studies. Data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (v.2.2.064).ResultsA total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the random-effects model, the overall Pressure ulcer prevalence rate was 16.6% (95% CI (8.6–29.6)). Both the highest and lowest prevalence was observed in Jordan in 2011 at 83.1% (95% CI (71.2- 90.7)) and in 2012 at 0.9% (95% CI (0.5- 1.5)), respectively. The results showed that publication year, average age, and sample size were the main causes of heterogeneity between the reviewed studies (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent peer-reviewed literature revealed a high prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries of 16% in intensive care units of Eastern Mediterranean region. Therefore, it is necessary for health policymakers and managers in Eastern Mediterranean Region to take necessary measures to prevent the incidence of Pressure ulcers in hospitals, especially in ICUs.