Hospital-acquired Conditions Research Articles

The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.

Quality assessment organizations leverage numerous patient safety measures to evaluate hospital performance, resulting in significant financial, administrative, and operational burdens on health systems. Low-intensity approaches that allow for reliable risk stratification of patients can reduce the required investment. The Braden score is a routinely performed bedside nursing evaluation validated to assess risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. We hypothesized that the tool can be used to evaluate risk for other hospital-related adverse outcomes, including mortality, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI). We found that abnormal Braden scores have significant association with numerous adverse outcome measures, including mortality, CLABSI, CAUTI, and iatrogenic hypoglycemia. Because of its frequency of reevaluation, we have found preliminary evidence that leveraging this tool can reduce harm by quickly identifying the most at-risk patients for various types of iatrogenic harm. We conclude that in the face of increasing automation and technical applications, for example, artificial intelligence-driven tools, highly reliable clinician bedside physical examination and evaluation can still have significant, low-cost, and high-value impact in improving patient safety.

Exploring the Relationship Between Hospital Patient Safety Culture and Performance on Measures of Hospital-Acquired Conditions

Objective The aim of the study is to examine the relationship between hospital perceptions of patient safety culture and the incidence of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) included in Medicare’s HAC Reduction Program utilizing updated and standardized metrics. Methods The pooled cross-sectional study design utilized the 2018 and 2021 datasets from (1) the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS), (2) the American Hospital Association’s annual survey, and (3) the Center for Medicare and Medicaid’s Hospital Compare dataset. The final analytic sample included 131 acute care, nonfederal, U.S. facilities. Multivariable linear regression models were used to compare the HSOPS domains of patient safety culture to CMS’s HAC metrics. Results Controlling for hospital structural and patient-mix characteristics, hospitals with higher staff-reported ratings of overall patient safety culture (‘overall perceptions of patient safety’ and ‘patient safety grade’) had significantly lower rates of HACs, including total HAC rate, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and central line-associated blood stream infections (P’s < 0.000–0.044). Higher HSOPS domain scores were variably associated with lower HAC rates, with consistently significant associations found for domains related to nonpunitive, open communication (P’s < 0.05). Conclusions Our relatively robust results suggest that while patient safety culture may not be the only strategy necessary to improve HAC rates, it needs to be aligned with other efforts to improve quality and safety. This underscores the importance of cultivating a culture of psychological safety that promotes open feedback and communication about errors.

Defects in Value Associated With Hospital-Acquired Conditions: How Improving Quality Could Save U.S. Healthcare $50 Billion.

Hospital-acquired conditions in the United States are considered avoidable complications but remain common statistics reflecting on health system performance and are a leading cause of patient fatality. Currently, over 3.7 million patients experience a hospital-acquired condition in the United States each year, which costs the U.S. healthcare delivery system an excess of $48 billion. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for common hospital-acquired conditions (e.g., infections, falls, pressure injuries) to reduce risk to the patient. In each of these instances, preventing the outcome with these guidelines costs less than treating the outcome, in addition to keeping the patient safe from harm. By applying the framework of defects in value to hospital-acquired conditions, we estimate that U.S. health systems could avert this $48 billion in spending on treating harmful hospital-acquired conditions; more so, these systems of care could recuperate over $35 billion after investing proportionally in a system that delivers greater quality by preventing hospital-acquired conditions over treating them. Currently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services only withholds reimbursements for hospital-acquired conditions and penalizes health systems with high rates of these outcomes. However, payers do not offer any reward-based incentives for hospital-acquired condition prevention. A series of policy and health system solutions, including tracking of hospital-acquired condition rates in electronic health records, identifying centers of excellence at reducing rates of harm with the use of clinical practice guidelines, and rewarding them monetarily for reduced rates could create equal-sided risk and opportunity to engage health systems in improved performance.

Evaluating the Effect of Financial Penalty on Hospital-Acquired Infections.

This study explores the effects of CMS reimbursement financial penalties from the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) on hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in hospitals across the United States. Hospital-level data for 2896 hospitals in the United States were evaluated using multiple linear regression models with random effects analysis through a difference-in-differences study design to examine HAIs under the HACRP between hospitals that were financially penalized or not from calendar years 2013 to 2020. This study showed significant differences from the pre-program Total HAC scores to the most recent reviewed year, validating the efficacy of the HACRP, and showing a reduction of overall HAIs over the years evaluated in the study. The multiple linear regression model with random effects analysis produced a significant (p < 0.001) interaction term between hospitals expected to be penalized in 2013 and each year evaluated in the study (-0.412 estimate) confirming decreases in HAI scores, and overall decreases in HAIs across the years of the study. Notably, 98% of hospitals in the worst-performing, expected to be financially penalized quartile from 2013, were found to have decreased their HAIs in their facilities, while only 38.8% of hospital in the performing, non-penalized quartiles showed decreases in HAIs across their facilities, by 2020. Our research indicates that implementing financial disincentives through reimbursement reductions could potentially decrease the incidence of HAIs. Our study further suggests that incorporating financial penalties and incentives for HAIs annually across all hospitals may lead to significant reductions in HAIs throughout the US healthcare system.

Nurse understaffing associated with adverse outcomes for surgical admissions.

Nurses play a crucial role in maintaining the safety of surgical patients. Few nurse staffing studies have looked specifically at surgical patients to examine the impact of exposure to low staffing on patient outcomes. A longitudinal patient analysis was conducted in four organizations in England using routine data from 213 910 admissions to all surgical specialties. Patients' staffing exposures were modelled as counts of understaffed registered nurse and nurse assistant days in the first 5 inpatient days. Understaffing was identified when staffing per patient-day was below the mean for the ward. Cox models were used to examine mortality within 30 days of admission and readmission within 30 days of discharge. Generalized linear models were used to investigate duration of hospital stay and occurrence of hospital-acquired conditions. Increased exposure to registered nurse understaffing was associated with longer hospital stay and increased risk of deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, and pressure ulcers. This was also true for nurse assistant understaffing, but the effect sizes tended to be smaller. In the Cox models, there were similarly increased hazards of death for registered nurse understaffing (HR 1.09, 95% c.i. 1.07 to 1.12) and nurse assistant understaffing (HR 1.10, 1.08 to 1.13), whereas the effect size of registered nurse understaffing for readmission (HR 1.02, 1.02 to 1.03) was greater than that seen with nurse assistants (HR 1.01, 1.01 to 1.02). Understaffing by both registered nurses and nursing assistants is associated with increased risks of a range of adverse events, and generally larger effects are seen with registered nurse understaffing.

Hospital costs for unplanned re-admissions within 30 days of hospitalisations with heart failure, Australia, 2013-2017: a retrospective cohort study.

To assess the direct hospital costs for unplanned re-admissions within 30 days of hospitalisations with heart failure in Australia; to estimate the proportion of these costs attributable to potentially preventable re-admissions. Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked admitted patient data collections data. People admitted to hospital (all public and most private hospitals in Australia) with primary diagnoses of heart failure, 1 January 2013 - 31 December 2017, who were discharged alive and re-admitted to hospital at least once (any cause) within 30 days of discharge. Estimated re-admission costs based on National Hospital Cost Data Collection, by unplanned re-admission category based on the primary re-admission diagnosis: potentially hospital-acquired condition; recurrence of heart failure; other diagnoses related to heart failure; all other diagnoses. The first two groups were deemed the most preventable. The 165 612 eligible hospitalisations of people with heart failure during 2013-2017 (mean age, 79 years [standard deviation, 12 years]; 85 964 men [51.9%]) incurred direct hospital costs of $1881.4 million (95% confidence interval [CI], $1872.5-1890.2 million), or $376.3 million per year (95% CI, $374.5-378.1 million per year) and $11 360 per patient (95% CI, $11 312-11 408 per patient). A total of 41 125 people (24.8%) experienced a total of 58 977 unplanned re-admissions within 30 days of discharge from index admissions; these re-admissions incurred direct hospital costs of $604.4 million (95% CI, $598.2-610.5 million), or 32% of total index admission costs; that is, $120.9 million per year (95% CI, $119.6-122.1 million per year), and $14 695 per patient (95% CI, $14 535-14 856 per patient). Re-admissions with potentially hospital-acquired conditions (21 641 re-admissions) accounted for 40.1% of unplanned re-admission costs, recurrence of heart failure (18 666 re-admissions) for 35.6% of re-admission costs. Unplanned re-admissions after hospitalisations with heart failure are expensive, incurring costs equivalent to 32% of those for the initial hospitalisations; a large proportion of these costs are associated with potentially preventable re-admissions. Reducing the number of unplanned re-admissions could improve outcomes for people with heart failure and reduce hospital costs.

Blood Culture Contamination Mitigation: Sustaining Success and Stewardship Systemwide

Background: False-positive blood cultures compromise care; extended stays, Clostridioides difficile risk increases and renal woes tagged to antibiotic alms contribute to the doubling of patient in-hospital mortality that is observed relative to true negative diagnostic results. False-positive affiliated central line-associated bloodstream infection reports can further obfuscate the quality of care provided. Between personnel performance pressures, laboratory resource losses and the risk for financial penalty under Value-Based Purchasing and Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Programs (Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services), it becomes difficult to brush aside the burden of a non-zero blood culture contamination rate. Following unsuccessful and unsustainable endeavors that included educational exercise and waste tube employment, initial-specimen diversion devices designed to shift performance burdens from technicians to technology were co-opted in an effort to secure reliable blood culture contamination rate reductions. Methods: A 3.6% blood culture contamination rate was observed systemwide prior to intervention, which began in 2020. Among seventeen facilities that share a data system, twelve co-opted initial-specimen diversion device technology as the evidence-based anchor to a trifurcate intervention strategy that included value analysis and cultural curation. Results: The 2023 systemwide blood culture contamination rate was 1.95%; down from 2.8% in 2022 and 3.2% in 2021. The average cost per false-positive event was $2,111, with intervention amounting to systemwide savings of $4.1 million in 2023 as approximately 1,920 patients avoided false-positive incidents. Critical to year-over-year systemwide uptick in adoption of interventive technology was consistent and near real-time communication to caretakers regarding outcomes. Conclusion: The sustained success of the multifactorial solution showcased herein stems from the coupling of an evidence-based action with an ongoing assessment of value and communication channels carefully constructed to celebrate and perpetuate value observed. Layered uncertainties often cloud the crux of a multifactorial solution to a complex conundrum; for many decades the literature-supported solution to high blood culture contamination rates was to educate every person involved in every possible way. Only recently, following recommended practice revisions endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, did it become apparent nationwide that education alone was insufficient; some contaminant pathways persist without meticulously mechanical closure. Antimicrobial stewardship requires the respectful removal of adaptable pressures from microorganisms, but the inverse is equally important; by setting an ambitious systemwide blood culture contamination rate target of 1% or less, it is hoped that all facilities involved herein respond to this pressure with optimism, introspection and innovation.

Surgical Urgency, Patient Comorbidities, and Socioeconomic Factors in Surgical Site Infections in Pediatric Surgery.

The rise of value-based purchasing has led to decreased compensation for hospital-acquired conditions, including surgical site infections (SSI). This study aims to assess the risk factors for SSI in children and teenagers undergoing gastrointestinal surgery across US hospitals. The 2018-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery under the age of 18. The primary outcome was SSI during index admission or readmission within a year. Comparison groups were elective, trauma, and emergent surgery based on anatomic location and urgency. Univariable comparison used chi-squared tests for relevant variables. Confounders were addressed through multivariable logistic regression with significant variables from univariable analysis. 113108 total patients met the study criteria. The SSI rate during admission or readmission was 2.9% (n = 3254). Infections during admission and readmission were 1.4% (n = 1560) and 1.5% (n = 1694), respectively. The most common site was organ space (48.6%, n = 1657). Increased infection risk was associated with trauma (OR 1.80 [1.51-2.16] P < .001), emergency surgery (OR 1.31 [1.17-1.47] P < .001), large bowel surgery (OR 2.78 [2.26-3.43] P < .001), and those with three or more comorbidities (OR 2.03 [1.69-2.45] P < .001). Investor-owned hospitals (OR .65 [.56-.76] P < .001) and highest quartile income (OR .80 [.73-.88] P < .001) were associated with decreased infection risk. Pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery face an elevated risk of SSI, especially in trauma and emergency surgeries, particularly with multiple comorbidities. Meanwhile, a reduced risk is observed in high-income and investor-owned hospital settings. Hospitals and surgeons caring for high risk patients should advocate for risk adjustment in value-based payment systems.

Reducing Tracheostomy-Related Acquired Pressure Injury by Flipping the Ventilator Circuit Position Study.

Tracheostomy-related acquired pressure injuries (TRPIs) are one of the hospital-acquired conditions. We hypothesize that an uneven ventilator circuit load, leading to non-neutral tracheostomy tube positioning in the immediate post-tracheostomy period, leads to an increased incidence of TRPIs. Does switching the ventilator circuit load daily, in addition to standard post-tracheostomy care, lead to a decreased incidence of TRPIs? This is a prospective quality improvement study. Study was conducted at two academic hospital sites within tertiary care hospitals at Emory University in different ICUs. Consecutive patients undergoing bedside percutaneous tracheostomy by the interventional pulmonary service were included. The flip the ventilator circuit (FLIC) protocol was designed and implemented in selected ICUs, with other ICUs as controls. Incidence of TRPI in intervention and control group were recorded at post-tracheostomy day 5. A total of 99 patients were included from October 22, 2019, to May 22, 2020. Overall, the total incidence of any TRPI was 23% at post-tracheostomy day 5. Incidence of stage I, stage II, and stages III-IV TRPIs at postoperative day 5 was 11%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. There was a decrease in the rate of skin breakdown in patients following the FLIC protocol when compared with standard of care (13% vs. 36%; p = 0.01). In a multivariable analysis, interventional group had decreased odds of developing TRPI (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.03) after adjusting for age, albumin, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and days in hospital before tracheostomy. The incidence of TRPIs within the first week following percutaneous tracheostomy is high. Switching the side of the ventilator circuit to evenly distribute load, in addition to standard bundled tracheostomy care, may decrease the overall incidence of TRPIs.

Precision in Prevention: Tailoring Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Utilization Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Surgical Site Complications Risk and Cost Modeling.

Background: Surgical site complications (SSCs) are common, yet preventable hospital-acquired conditions. Single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) has been shown to be effective in reducing rates of these complications. In the era of value-based care, strategic allocation of sNPWT is needed to optimize both clinical and financial outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the Premier Healthcare Database (2017-2021) for 10 representative open procedures in orthopedic, abdominal, cardiovascular, cesarean delivery, and breast surgery. After separating data into training and validation sets, various machine learning algorithms were used to develop pre-operative SSC risk prediction models. Model performance was assessed using standard metrics and predictors of SSCs were identified through feature importance evaluation. Highest-performing models were used to simulate the cost-effectiveness of sNPWT at both the patient and population level. Results: The prediction models demonstrated good performance, with an average area under the curve of 76%. Prominent predictors across subspecialities included age, obesity, and the level of procedure urgency. Prediction models enabled a simulation analysis to assess the population-level cost-effectiveness of sNPWT, incorporating patient and surgery-specific factors, along with the established efficacy of sNPWT for each surgical procedure. The simulation models uncovered significant variability in sNPWT's cost-effectiveness across different procedural categories. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that machine learning models can effectively predict a patient's risk of SSC and guide strategic utilization of sNPWT. This data-driven approach allows for optimization of clinical and financial outcomes by strategically allocating sNPWT based on personalized risk assessments.

Incidence and associated factors of surgical site infection in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery: a 7-year cohort study

Surgical site infections (SSI) constitute 31% of all hospital-acquired conditions, with ankle and foot surgical procedures showing an incidence of SSI ranging from 0.5% to 6.5%. This study aimed to assess the incidence of both superficial and deep surgical site infections in foot and ankle surgery, along with associated factors. Conducted as a retrospective cohort study, it included 2180 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in a private hospital between 2014 and 2020, encompassing elective and trauma cases. Outcome variables comprised SSI, while predictor variables encompassed sex, age, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index. Logistic regression models were employed to identify associations between study variables. The incidence of surgical site infections stood at 4% (83/2180), comprising a rate of 2.8% (57/2180) for superficial infections and 1.2% (26/2180) for deep infections. Smoking (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.4–5.3) and ASA score >2 (OR 3.4, 95%CI 1.2–8.4) emerged as independent factors associated with surgical site infections. The group with deep infections exhibited higher proportions of smokers (p = 0.002), systemic arterial hypertension (p = 0.018), trauma surgery (p = 0.049), and an ASA score >2 (p = 0.011). Overall infection incidence in this cohort reached 4%, with trauma cases, smoking, hypertension, and an ASA score >2 independently linked to deep infections. Surgeons should be cognizant of these risk factors when managing prophylactic antibiotic regimens for patients.

Impact of a relocation to a new critical care building on pediatric safety events.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) relocated the pediatric, cardiac, and neonatal intensive care units (PICU, CICU and NICU) to a newly constructed critical care building (CCB) in November 2021. Simulation and onboarding sessions were implemented before the relocation, aimed at mitigating latent safety threats. To evaluate the impact of ICU relocation to the CCHMC CCB on patient safety as measured by the quantity, rate, severity score, and category of safety reports. This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study compared safety reports filed in a 90-day period before and following the CCB relocation. The primary outcome was pre- and postrelocation safety report rates per 100 patient-days. Secondary outcomes included safety report severity, category, and rate of hospital acquired conditions (HACs). Total safety report incidence increased by 16% across all ICUs postrelocation with no difference in post- versus prerelocation odds ratio between ICUs. Three isolated instances of special cause variation were found, one in NICU and two in CICU. No special cause variation was found in the PICU. There were no statistical differences in assigned safety report severity pre- to postrelocation for all ICUs, and only lab specimen/test related safety reports showed a statistically significant increase postrelocation. Overall rates of HACs were low, with six occurring prerelocation and eight postrelocation. All three ICUs were relocated to the new CCB with minimal changes in the incidence, severity, or category of safety reports filed, suggesting staff training and preparations ahead of the relocation mitigated latent safety threats.

Sprint Team Approach Yields Rapid Improvement in Leapfrog Quality Indicators.

Patient safety and quality care are two critical areas that every healthcare organization strives to grow and improve upon. At Scripps Health, specific efforts reviewed for this article were implemented to reduce hospital-acquired conditions and hospital readmissions that are components of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs and Leapfrog Hospital Survey scores. Sprint teams, a novel approach to rapidly develop a checklist for lower-performing care improvement areas, were implemented after an internal review of existing tools and an evidence-based literature review. These areas included catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), Clostridioides difficile (C. diff.) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure readmissions, surgical site infections and handwashing, bar coding, and the computerized physician order entry components of Leapfrog scoring. The checklist for each area served as a teaching tool for staff and a guideline for case review to ensure that standard work was routinely performed. The sprint teams showed dramatic results in the initial focus areas. From a baseline standardized infection ratio (SIR) of 1.141 for CLABSIs, the sprint team reduced the SIR to 0.885 in Year 1 of the program and to 0.687 in Year 2. For CAUTIs, the SIR decreased from a baseline of 1.391 in Year 1 to 0.720 in Year 2. C. diff. infections fell from 0.422 to 0.315 in Year 1 and to 0.260 in Year 2. While the MRSA SIR did not improve during the first year, the MRSA reduction sprint team showed success in Year 2 with a decrease in the SIR from 0.537 to 0.245. Readmission reduction sprint teams focused on heart failure, COPD, and total hip and knee complications. The teams also achieved positive results in reducing readmissions by following checklists and reviewing each readmission case for justification. Rapid change can be safely and effectively implemented with multidisciplinary sprint teams. Developed with an evidence-based, case review approach, sprint team checklists can help to standardize processes for the review of any infections or readmissions that occur in the inpatient arena.

Teaching and Safety-Net Hospital Penalization in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program

The Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) evaluates acute care hospitals on the occurrence of patient safety events and health care-associated infections. Since its implementation, several studies have raised concerns about the overpenalization of teaching and safety-net hospitals, and although several changes in the program's methodology have been applied in the last few years, whether these changes reversed the overpenalization of teaching and safety-net hospitals is unknown. To determine hospital characteristics associated with HACRP penalization and penalization reversal. This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed data from 3117 acute care hospitals participating in the HACRP. The HACRP penalization and hospital characteristics were obtained from Hospital Compare (2020 and 2021), the Inpatient Prospective Payment System impact file (2020), and the American Hospital Association annual survey (2018). Hospital characteristics, including safety-net status and teaching intensity (no teaching and very minor, minor, major, and very major teaching levels). The primary outcome was HACRP penalization (ie, hospitals that fell within the worst quartile of the program's performance). Multivariable models initially included all covariates, and then backward stepwise variable selection was used. Of 3117 hospitals that participated in HACRP in 2020, 779 (25.0%) were safety-net hospitals and 1090 (35.0%) were teaching institutions. In total, 771 hospitals (24.7%) were penalized. The HACRP penalization was associated with safety-net status (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.16-1.71]) and very major teaching intensity (OR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.15-3.28]). In addition, non-federal government hospitals were more likely to be penalized than for-profit hospitals (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.23-2.14]), as were level I trauma centers (OR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.43-2.96]) and hospitals located in the New England region (OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.12-2.43]). Safety-net hospitals with major teaching levels were twice as likely to be penalized as non-safety-net nonteaching hospitals (OR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.14-4.03]). Furthermore, safety-net hospitals penalized in 2020 were less likely (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43-0.96]) to revert their HACRP penalization status in 2021. Findings from this cross-sectional study indicated that teaching and safety-net hospital status continued to be associated with overpenalization in the HACRP despite recent changes in its methodology. Most of these hospitals were also less likely to revert their penalization status. A reevaluation of the program methodology is needed to avoid depleting resources of hospitals caring for underserved populations.

Factors associated with safe and successful postoperative day 1 discharge after lung operations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundA shorter length of stay (LOS) is associated with fewer hospital-acquired adverse conditions and decreased utilization of hospital resources. While modern perioperative care protocols have enabled some ambitious surgical teams to achieve discharge as early as within postoperative day 1 (POD1), most other teams remain cautious about such an approach due to the perceived risk of missing postoperative complications and increased readmission rates. We aimed to identify factors that would help guide surgical teams aiming for safe and successful POD1 discharge after lung resection.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL databases for articles comparing perioperative characteristics in patients discharged within POD1 (DWPOD1) and after POD1 (DAPOD1) following lung resection. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.ResultsWe included eight retrospective cohort studies with a total of 216,887 patients, of which 22,250 (10.3%) patients were DWPOD1. Our meta-analysis showed that younger patients, those without cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities, and those with better preoperative pulmonary function are more likely to qualify for DWPOD1. Certain operative factors, such as a minimally invasive approach, shorter operations, and sublobar resections, also favor DWPOD1. DWPOD1 appears to be safe, with comparable 30-day mortality and readmission rates, and significantly less postoperative morbidity than DAPOD1.ConclusionsIn select patients with a favorable preoperative profile, DWPOD1 after lung resection can be achieved successfully and without increased risk of adverse outcomes such as postoperative morbidity, mortality, or readmissions.

Impact of Repeated Reimbursement Penalties on Hospital Total Quality Scores.

The incidence of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) is a serious public health issue with implications ranging from patient morbidity and mortality to negative financial impacts on patients and health care systems. Despite substantial efforts to address and reduce HACs, research into the effect of quality improvement programs is inconclusive. This study seeks to better understand the relationship between repeated reimbursement penalties and improvement in HAC quality scores. A quantitative comparative analysis of U.S. health care data was conducted. Data on quality outcomes and hospital characteristics were sourced from the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program from fiscal years 2018 and 2019 and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Inpatient Prospective Payment System impact files, respectively. In total, 3123 U.S. hospitals were analyzed to compare differences between total HAC scores of hospitals with and without penalties in consecutive years. Hospitals with repeated penalties had significantly greater improvement in scores ( t497.262 = -13.00, P < 0.001), and the impact was greatest in small hospitals (<100 beds). Repeated penalties had a smaller impact on disproportionate share hospitals (Cohen d = 0.73). Among all hospitals, the effect of repeated penalties was large (Cohen d = 0.75). This study suggests that repeated penalties can improve quality scores in U.S. hospitals. However, the effect may be exaggerated for smaller hospitals and those that serve patient populations with a relatively higher socioeconomic status. The reason disproportionate share hospitals did not show as much improvement as nondisproportionate hospitals may be because hospitals serving vulnerable populations often have fewer resources.

Evidence on the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in a hospital setting: A systematic review.

Value-based payment is among payment models rewarding health care providers for achieving pre-defined targets of quality or efficiency measures of care. This paper aims to identify the evidence of the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in hospital settings. A systematic review of databases for studies published from 2000 to 2022 that evaluated VBP programs was conducted. We searched four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Sciences in July 2023. Studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesize and summarize the findings. Overall, 29 articles looking into the VBP programs have been included. Most articles describe the effects on the outcome of care (n = 18). The findings of a great deal of evidence in this field show that VBP is not correlated with some outcome measures including hospital-acquired conditions, 30-day mortality, mortality trends, as well as mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction or heart failure. Only three of 12 studies have revealed a positive relationship between a P4P program and efficiency. Seven studies from the United States (US) found no evidence or mixed findings on the effects of P4P on efficiency. The magnitude of the effects of VBP on healthcare quality, patient experience, and costs has often been small and non-significant. The unintended negative impact of incentives in value-based payment on hospitals should be tackled when adopting policies and decisions.

Optimized Treatment of Nosocomial Peritonitis.

This comprehensive review aims to provide a practical guide for intensivists, focusing on enhancing patient care associated with nosocomial peritonitis (NP). It explores the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of NP, a significant contributor to the mortality of surgical patients worldwide. NP is, per definition, a hospital-acquired condition and a consequence of gastrointestinal surgery or a complication of other diseases. NP, one of the most prevalent causes of sepsis in surgical Intensive Care Units (ICUs), is often associated with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria and high mortality rates. Early clinical suspicion and the utilization of various diagnostic tools like biomarkers and imaging are of great importance. Microbiology is often complex, with antimicrobial resistance escalating in many parts of the world. Fungal peritonitis and its risk factors, diagnostic hurdles, and effective management approaches are particularly relevant in patients with NP. Contemporary antimicrobial strategies for treating NP are discussed, including drug resistance challenges and empirical antibiotic regimens. The importance of source control in intra-abdominal infection management, including surgical and non-surgical interventions, is also emphasized. A deeper exploration into the role of open abdomen treatment as a potential option for selected patients is proposed, indicating an area for further investigation. This review underscores the need for more research to advance the best treatment strategies for NP.

Automated Electronic Frailty Index–Identified Frailty Status and Associated Postsurgical Adverse Events

Electronic frailty index (eFI) is an automated electronic health record (EHR)-based tool that uses a combination of clinical encounters, diagnosis codes, laboratory workups, medications, and Medicare annual wellness visit data as markers of frailty status. The association of eFI with postanesthesia adverse outcomes has not been evaluated. To examine the association of frailty, calculated as eFI at the time of the surgical procedure and categorized as fit, prefrail, or frail, with adverse events after elective noncardiac surgery. This cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The cohort included patients 55 years or older who underwent noncardiac surgery of at least 1 hour in duration between October 1, 2017, and June 30, 2021. Frailty calculated by the eFI tool. Preoperative eFI scores were calculated based on available data 1 day prior to the procedure and categorized as fit (eFI score: ≤0.10), prefrail (eFI score: >0.10 to ≤0.21), or frail (eFI score: >0.21). The primary outcome was a composite of the following 8 adverse component events: 90-item Patient Safety Indicators (PSI 90) score, hospital-acquired conditions, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, 30-day emergency department visit after surgery, transfer to a skilled nursing facility after surgery, or unexpected intensive care unit admission after surgery. Secondary outcomes were each of the component events of the composite. Of the 33 449 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [61-74] years; 17 618 females [52.7%]) included, 11 563 (34.6%) were classified as fit, 15 928 (47.6%) as prefrail, and 5958 (17.8%) as frail. Using logistic regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, and comorbidity burden, patients with prefrail (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.18-1.30; P < .001) and frail (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.58-1.82; P < .001) statuses were more likely to experience postoperative adverse events compared with patients with a fit status. Subsequent adjustment for all other potential confounders or covariates did not alter this association. For every increase in eFI of 0.03 units, the odds of a composite of postoperative adverse events increased by 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.13; P < .001). This cohort study found that frailty, as measured by an automatically calculated index integrated within the EHR, was associated with increased risk of adverse events after noncardiac surgery. Deployment of eFI tools may support screening and possible risk modification, especially in patients who undergo high-risk surgery.

Factors Associated with Acute Injurious Falls in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Multicenter Descriptive Study.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions (CMS-HAC) links Medicare payments to health care quality. Experiencing a serious disability or death associated with a fall in a health care facility based on diagnosis codes has been identified as an opportunity for improvement. Multiple factors contribute to an inpatient fall, including medications that affect cognition in older adults. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the commonly prescribed classes of medications on the CMS-HAC falls and trauma definition in US hospitals in a large inpatient database from 2019 to 2021. The authors analyzed data from 835 hospitals in the Vizient Clinical Data Base between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, on patients ≥ 65 years of age with CMS-HAC patient falls and trauma codes. Using logistic regression and stepwise Poisson regression analysis, the authors identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-related variables associated with falls meeting the CMS-HAC definition. The top 20 prescribed drug classes in these patients were also identified. Among 11,064,024 patient encounters, 5,978 met the CMS-HAC definition of a serious fall. Patients who experienced a serious fall were significantly more likely to be > 79 years of age (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.37), have a history of prior falls (p < 0.001, OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.11-2.50), have a code for dementia (p < 0.001, OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.40-1.60), and have higher anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scores (p < 0.001, OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.13-1.14). Specific medication classes associated with CMS-HAC falls were first-generation antihistamines (p < 0.00, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.35), second-generation antihistamines (p ≤ 0.001, OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.19), and atypical antipsychotics (p < 0.001, OR 1.18, CI 1.13-1.29). Patients who experience a fall meeting the CMS-HAC fall definition are significantly more likely to have a prior history of falling, dementia, and a higher ACB score. Results from this study may inform future quality improvement work aimed at reducing injurious falls.