Hospice Inpatient Unit Research Articles

Understanding Intensive Care Unit Family Caregivers' Vulnerability to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: The Impact of Neurotic Personality Traits, Emotional Suppression, and Perceptions of Unexpected Death.

Rationale: Family members of patients who die in an intensive care unit (ICU) are at heightened risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Not all surrogates develop these symptoms and heterogeneity exists in PTSD symptom clusters. Objectives: The study tested a personality model of PTSD symptoms in bereaved family caregivers of ICU patients. It was hypothesized that family members endorsing higher levels of neurotic personality traits would report higher levels of PTSD symptom clusters and that these associations would be explained by tendencies to view the patient's death as unexpected and to cope by suppressing their emotions. Methods: Participants were family members of ICU patients at an urban, academic medical center who either died or were discharged to an inpatient hospice unit. Participants were contacted for participation at least six months after the patient's death. Participants completed measures of personality, emotion regulation, and PTSD symptoms. Data were analyzed using path analysis. Results: Approximately one-third (35%) of the sample of 162 caregivers endorsed at-risk levels of PTSD. Individuals reporting higher levels of neurotic personality traits reported more PTSD symptoms (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). Perceptions that the patient death was unexpected partially explained the association of neuroticism with the intrusive re-experiencing PTSD symptoms (B = 0.45, p = 0.031). In contrast, emotional suppression partially explained the association of neuroticism with avoidance (B = 0.70, p = 0.010) and hyperarousal symptom clusters (B = 0.37, p = 0.041). Conclusions: Family vulnerability to PTSD after an ICU death can be conceptualized based on neurotic personality traits. Tendencies to view the patient's death as unexpected may contribute to intrusive thoughts and memories of the ICU experience. Individuals may avoid reminders and remain at heightened levels of arousal when they suppress their emotional experiences. Key Message: Family members who experience the death of a loved one following ICU treatment are vulnerable to PTSD symptoms. These reactions to ICU-related losses may be shaped by family members' personalities, expectations, and emotion regulation styles. Understanding these characteristics could inform family screening and intervention efforts in the ICU.

The 4AT, a rapid delirium detection tool for use in hospice inpatient units: Findings from a validation study

Background: Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric syndrome with adverse outcomes, which is common but often undiagnosed in terminally ill people. The 4 ‘A’s test or 4AT (www.the4AT.com), a brief delirium detection tool, is widely used in general settings, but validation studies in terminally ill people are lacking. Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT in detecting delirium in terminally ill people, who are hospice inpatients. Design: A diagnostic test accuracy study in which participants underwent the 4AT and a reference standard based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The reference standard was informed by Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 and tests assessing arousal and attention. Assessments were conducted in random order by pairs of independent raters, blinded to the results of the other assessment. Setting/participants: Two hospice inpatient units in Scotland, UK. Participants were 148 hospice inpatients aged ⩾18 years. Results: A total of 137 participants completed both assessments. Three participants had an indeterminate reference standard diagnosis and were excluded, yielding a final sample of 134. Mean age was 70.3 (SD = 10.6) years. About 33% (44/134) had reference standard delirium. The 4AT had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 79%–98%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 90%–99%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–1). Conclusion: The results of this validation study support use of the 4AT as a delirium detection tool in hospice inpatients, and add to the literature evaluating methods of delirium detection in palliative care settings. Trial registry: ISCRTN 97417474.

An observational study protocol to capture, validate and characterise lucid episodes in people living with advanced dementia receiving hospice care

IntroductionLucid episodes (LEs) in advanced neurodegenerative disease, characterised by a transient recovery of abilities, have been reported across neurological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Evidence on LEs in...

Dignity in Diversity: Navigating End-of-Life Care for a Transgender Woman in an Inpatient Hospice Unit

Dignity in Diversity: Navigating End-of-Life Care for a Transgender Woman in an Inpatient Hospice Unit

Adding spontaneity to organizations – what hospice volunteers contribute to everyday life in German inpatient hospice and palliative care units: a qualitative study

BackgroundVolunteers have always been integral to hospice and palliative care. However, their roles have been left relatively undefined and broad.AimThis study aims to examine the role of hospice volunteers in German inpatient hospice and palliative care. The question we seek to answer is: What do hospice volunteers contribute to everyday life in inpatient hospice and palliative care units?MethodsWe undertook a multicenter, on-site qualitative interview study, utilizing problem-centered interviews with 16 volunteers from five inpatient hospice units and one hospital palliative care unit. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory.ResultsAnalysis of the interviews revealed three typical characteristics of how hospice volunteers’ describe their own role: (1) performing small acts of kindness, (2) creating a family-like atmosphere, (3) expecting emotional experiences. A common theme across all categories is the emphasis on spontaneous actions and personal experiences. The process of dying becomes an experience interpreted by volunteers as enriching, as a gift, as a “teacher”.ConclusionGranting hospice volunteers freedom to act spontaneously and intuitively benefits hospice and palliative care delivery. Organizations should leave sufficient room for spontaneity in order to involve volunteers effectively. Open and unstandardized roles facilitate dynamic work practices.

“Beyond Feasibility”: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Their Whānau (Family) and Staff Perspectives and Experiences of a Non- Pharmacological Delirium-Prevention Intervention in Two Aotearoa/New Zealand Hospices

ContextDelirium is prevalent in the hospice population. Despite causing significant distress to patients and families, delirium is under-recognised. There is a need to better understand delirium prevention and outcomes in this population including people's experiences of delirium-prevention strategies in different cultural contexts. ObjectivesTo determine whether the "PRESERVE Aotearoa" delirium prevention intervention was feasible and acceptable for Māori (indigenous peoples of Aotearoa/ New Zealand) and non-Māori patients with advanced cancer, their families (called whānau in this paper), and clinical staff. MethodsA qualitative semistructured interview substudy of a cohort PRESERVE Aotearoa feasibility study codesigned with a Māori partner to ensure inclusion of Māori-centred values. The study was underpinned conceptually by He Awa Whiria (braided rivers)—combining Western and Māori knowledges. Data were analysed using Hopwood and Srivasta's framework. ResultsTwenty-six patients and their whānau, 21 clinical staff and five researchers from two stand-alone hospices in the North Island, Aotearoa/New Zealand. Finding showed that, for the most part, participants considered the study interventions feasible and acceptable. Inductive analysis resulted in four themes highlighting the importance to whānau of their participation in the study: benefits of learning about delirium; the affirmation of the caregiver role and whānau-centred care; valuing fundamentals of care; and research as legacy. ConclusionThis qualitative study found that it is feasible and acceptable to study multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium-prevention interventions in Aotearoa/New Zealand hospice inpatient units. The study also highlights the value of Māori-centred approaches and whānau involvement in these settings.

Prescribing and deprescribing in older people with life-limiting illnesses receiving hospice care at the end of life: A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study

Background: Although prescribing and deprescribing practices in older people have been the subject of much research generally, there are limited data in older people at the end of life. This highlights the need for research to determine prescribing and deprescribing patterns, as a first step to facilitate guideline development for medicines optimisation in this vulnerable population. Aims: To examine prescribing and deprescribing patterns in older people at the end of life and to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use. Design: A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study where medical records of eligible participants were reviewed, and data extracted. Medication appropriateness was assessed using two sets of consensus-based criteria; the STOPPFrail criteria and criteria developed by Morin et al. Setting/participants: Decedents aged 65 years and older admitted continuously for at least 14 days before death to three inpatient hospice units across Northern Ireland, who died between 1st January and 31st December 2018, and who had a known diagnosis, known cause of death and prescription data. Unexpected/sudden deaths were excluded. Results: Polypharmacy was reported to be continued until death in 96.2% of 106 decedents (mean age of 75.6 years). Most patients received at least one potentially inappropriate medication at the end of life according to the STOPPFrail and the criteria developed by Morin et al. (57.5 and 69.8% respectively). Limited prevalence of proactive deprescribing interventions was observed. Conclusions: In the absence of systematic rationalisation of drug treatments, a substantial proportion of older patients continued to receive potentially inappropriate medication until death.

Outcomes of patients placed on comfort care at a large, urban, quaternary care medical center.

229 Background: End-of-life care in the typical hospital setting has several drawbacks including lack of interdisciplinary hospice teams, less comfortable environments, and lack of provider experience. In addition, patients at the end of their life are often severely symptomatic and imminently dying and thus have barriers to appropriate disposition. Few studies have explored the outcomes of patients placed on comfort care with respect to hospice disposition. The objective of this study was to perform a retrospective analysis of patients who transitioned to comfort care at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH) to better understand the ultimate disposition of patients placed on comfort care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients placed on the comfort care order set between July 1st, 2021, until June 30th, 2022. A report of all patients placed on our institutions “comfort care order set” was run using Qlik analytics and data platform. Each individual patient chart was then analyzed to collect multiple clinical variables, including diagnoses, palliative care involvement, time on comfort care, hospital length of stay (in total and after comfort care order set placed), healthcare utilization prior to hospitalization, and IV medications used for symptom management. Participants were limited to those 18 years or older. IRB approval was obtained as per institutional guidelines. Results: 541 patients were included in the analysis. 424 (78.37%) patients died while still admitted to the hospital. This amounts to 1.5 patients a day requiring comfort care support. 60% of patients on comfort care were in the intensive care unit (ICU). The ICU population spent on average 11.04 (+/- 24) hours on comfort care. 19% of these patients were on comfort care for longer than 12 hours. Subspecialty and hospital medicine patients were on comfort care for 3.3 (+/- 3.3) days and 5 (+/- 9.5) days respectively. Within oncology patients, the average time was 3 (+/- 2.4) days. 94% of the patients placed on comfort care in the ICU died in the hospital as compared to 53% of subspecialty and 59% of hospital medicine patients. 40% of non-ICU patients were discharged with hospice services. The average length of stay for the study population was 12.5 (+/- 13.0) days. Conclusions: The majority of patients placed on comfort care died during their hospitalization demonstrating a real need for comprehensive end of life care and immediate hospice services for our patient population. For those discharged with hospice services, they spent an excessive amount of time in the hospital waiting for services to be arranged. Establishing a hospital based inpatient hospice unit has the potential to improve the patient and family experience, provide better end of life care, and reduce length of stay. Previous studies have also demonstrated decreased costs. Ongoing work is underway at our institution to provide optimal end of life care for this patient population.

Comparing end-of-life care of hematologic malignancy versus solid tumor patients in a tertiary care center.

To compare end-of-life (EOL) care for solid tumor and hematologic malignancy (HM) patients. We collected data on the last 100 consecutive deceased HM and 100 consecutive deceased solid tumor patients who died prior to June 1st 2020, treated at a single center. We compared demographic parameters, cause of death as ascertained by review of medical records by two independent investigators, and EOL quality indicators including: place of death, use of chemotherapy or targeted/biologic treatment, emergency department visits as well as hospital, inpatient hospice and Intensive Care Unit admissions and the time spent as inpatient over the last 30 days of life; mechanical ventilation and use of blood products during the last 14 days of life. In comparison with solid tumor patients, HM patients more commonly died from treatment complications (13% vs. 1%) and unrelated causes (16% vs. 2%, p < .001 for all comparisons). HM patients died more frequently than solid tumor patients in the intensive care unit (14% vs. 7%) and the emergency department (9% vs. 0%) and less frequently in hospice (9% vs. 15%, p = .005 for all comparisons). In the 2 weeks prior to death HM patients were more likely than solid tumor patients to undergo mechanical ventilation (14% vs. 4%, p = .013), receive blood (47% vs. 27%, p = .003) and platelet transfusions (32% vs. 7%, p < .001); however, no statistical difference was found in use of either of chemotherapy (18% vs. 13%, p = .28) or targeted treatment (10% vs. 5%, p = .16). HM patients were more likely than solid tumor patients to undergo aggressive measures at EOL. Rarity of HM deaths, frequently caused by complications of treatment and unrelated causes, may affect treatment choices at EOL.

Peptic ulcer in nephrotic syndrome patients due to steroid therapy

Peptic ulcers comprise gastric and duodenal ulcers. Complications of peptic ulcers include bleeding, perforation, and obstruction. Bleeding is a major problem of peptic ulcers, as it is at times fatal. Peptic ulcer bleeding is diagnosed and treated by upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Oral glucocorticosteroids (referred to hereafter as corticosteroids) are commonly prescribed for symptom control in patients receiving palliative care. A recent study has shown that one-third of patients admitted to an inpatient hospice unit were receiving corticosteroids. This frequency in prescribing exposes a large number of patients to the potential side effects known to be associated with corticosteroids, including weight gain, impaired glucose tolerance, and proximal myopathy.H. pylori infection is a risk factor for PUD in aspirin and NSAID users.

Inpatient hospice admissions. Who is admitted and why: a mixed-method prospective study

Background: Over the next two decades, the numbers of people who will need palliative care in the United Kingdom and Ireland is projected to increase. Hospices play a vital role supporting people who require specialist palliative care input through community-based and inpatient palliative care services. Evidence is needed to understand the role of these different services to inform future service development. Objectives: To describe the reasons for admission, and outcomes at the end of the stay, for patients admitted to two hospice inpatient units (IPUs). Design: This was a mixed-methods study using a convergent, parallel mixed-methods design. Methods: We reviewed the case notes of all patients admitted to two hospice inpatient units from July to November 2019; conducted semi-structured interviews with patients and families; as well as brief structured interviews with inpatient unit staff. Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were admitted to a hospice IPU, accounting for 276 admissions in total. Overall, 53% were female; median age was 71 years (range: 26–95 years). Most patients (95%) were White British or Scottish, and 95% had a cancer diagnosis. Most patients were admitted from the community, under one-third were admitted from hospital. Most (85%) had previous palliative care involvement. Nearly, half had district nurse support (48%). Worry and anxiety was frequently reported as a reason for admission, alongside physical concerns. Median length of stay was 12 days, and 68% died during their stay. Hospice was recorded as the preferred place of care for 56% of those who died there. Conclusions: Sustained efforts to promote the hospice as place of care for people with conditions other than cancer are needed alongside greater clarity regarding of the role of the hospice IPU, and who would benefit most from IPU support.

Exploration of delirium assessment and management in a hospice inpatient unit.

Background: Delirium is common across all palliative care settings. Guidelines exist to support the care of terminally ill people who develop delirium; yet the evidence base is limited. Recent surveys of palliative care specialists have suggested clinical practice is variable. Aim: To explore delirium assessment and management in a hospice inpatient setting. Methods: A mixed-methods study comprising a retrospective case note review of 21 patients admitted to a hospice inpatient unit and semi-structured interviews with seven hospice inpatient doctors and nurses. Results: A total of 62% of patients were screened for delirium on admission using the 4 As tool (4AT). The period prevalence of delirium was 76% during the 2-week study period. The term 'delirium' was documented infrequently in case notes, compared to other more ambiguous terms. Interview data suggested that nurses were unfamiliar with delirium screening tools. Conclusion: Lack of awareness about delirium screening tools and the infrequent use of the term 'delirium' may suggest that delirium goes under-recognised and under-treated. Further education and research are required to support the care of terminally ill people with delirium.

Interactive Evidence-Based Pressure Injury Education Program for Hospice Nursing: A Quality Improvement Approach.

PURPOSE:The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to develop and implement an interactive, evidence-based pressure injury (PI) education program and evaluate the impact on frontline hospice nursing staff knowledge and practice.PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING:The QI setting was a 12-bed inpatient hospice unit in a tertiary care Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio. Nineteen licensed and unlicensed hospice nursing staff participated in this pre-/postworkshop project.APPROACH:Chart audit determined baseline PI incidence and prevalence on the inpatient hospice unit. Interviews with key leaders informed the need to develop and implement innovative PI education opportunities. A literature review determined existing standards regarding the benefits of PI education for nursing staff but did not reveal measurable targets in hospice settings. We developed a PI education intervention based on Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort framework and a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) performance improvement model. Education was delivered in 7 workshops, lasting 2 hours each. Knowledge, practice, and comfort for inpatient hospice nursing staff were evaluated at baseline and 8 weeks following the final refresher visit. Workshop satisfaction was collected once using standard program evaluation forms after final workshop delivery.OUTCOMES:We observed a significant improvement in staff PI knowledge (P = .001) and practice (P = .001) after initial workshop attendance and repeat engagement (P = .001). There was a large magnitude of effect for overall knowledge change (d = 1.04); similarly PI care planning and practice showed a large magnitude of effect and significant improvement (P = .001, d = 2.64). Staff comfort with job duties was stable with low effect size (mean 4.52, d = 0.04), and satisfaction with the workshop education was high (100% agreement with trainer effectiveness).IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:We found that frontline hospice nursing staff knowledge and practice improved after attendance at our evidence-based PI education program. Results of this QI project have stimulated ongoing discussion on how to sustain this program in our hospice setting.

"If We Build It, Will They Come?" A Cohort Study of Family Utilization of a Pediatric-Specific Hospice Home.

Objective: To determine whether families would make use of a pediatric-specific inpatient hospice facility for end-of-life care for children. Background: Location of end-of-life care and death are important considerations when treating children with life-limiting conditions. There is very limited research on utilization of an inpatient hospice facility for end-of-life care if a pediatric-specific facility is available. We examined changes in family utilization of inpatient hospice services with the availability of an inpatient pediatric hospice facility (PHF). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with data collected on location of end-of-life care and death five years prior to and five years following the opening of a PHF that receives referrals from a large children s hospital in United States. Two data sources from the hospice organization were used: (1) a dataset on origins and outcomes of referrals to pediatric inpatient hospice care and (2) a dataset on location of death for all pediatric patients who had any contact with the hospice system. Chi-square analyses were conducted to assess the associations between the PHF opening and referral outcomes and location of death. Results: Significant results were found with respect to both referral outcomes and location of death. Engagement in inpatient hospice care increased between 2- and 10-fold following the opening of the inpatient PHF. The percent of patients who died in an inpatient hospice unit also increased significantly with the opening of the pediatric facility. Discussion: Results of this study show that providers are more likely to refer, and families are more likely to use inpatient hospice services when pediatric facilities are available. These results are important for establishing an evidence base in support for increasing access to PHFs.

Moderating the work distress experience among inpatient hospice staff: a qualitative study.

Background: Palliative and hospice care health professionals may be at risk of poorer psychological outcomes. It is unclear what specific stressors are experienced by staff and what impact they have on their psychological wellbeing. Aims: To identify stressors experienced when working in an adult hospice inpatient unit environment and how these are managed. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals working in a hospice adult inpatient unit. Findings: A total of 19 staff were interviewed. Six themes were constructed, with four related to stressors experienced: unrealistic workload, patient care, managing relationships, and work culture. Two themes concerned strategies for managing stressors were identified: peer support and time out. Conclusion: Changes within hospice care provision are placing demands on staff and reducing the amount of available resources. This may be alleviated by a move towards more compassionate workplaces. There is a need for further research to identify how distress can best be managed and how hospice organisations can best support healthcare staff.

Moral distress amongst palliative care doctors working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative-focussed interview study

Background: Palliative care professionals have had to adapt to rapidly changing COVID-19 restrictions with personal protective equipment and physical distancing measures impacting face-to-face communication with patients and relatives. Aim: To explore the narratives of palliative care doctors working during the pandemic to understand their experiences at a personal and professional level. Design: In-depth narrative interviews were carried out via video call. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a joint paradigmatic and narrative approach to elucidate common themes and closely explore individual narratives. Setting/participants: Eight palliative care doctors who had worked on a hospice inpatient unit in the UK before and during the pandemic were recruited from two hospices in Scotland. Results: Three intersecting themes are described, the most significant being moral distress. Participants articulated a struggle to reconcile their moral convictions with the restrictions enforced, for example, wanting to provide support to patients through physical proximity but being unable to. To differing degrees, this resulted in internal conflict and emotional distress. Two further themes arose: the first concerned a loss of humanity in interaction and a striving to re-humanise communication through alternative means; the second being a change in staff morale as the pandemic progressed. Conclusions: Restrictions had a considerable impact on palliative care doctors’ ability to communicate with and comfort patients which led to moral distress and contributed to decreasing morale. Future research could explore moral distress in palliative care settings internationally during the pandemic with a view to compare the factors affecting how moral distress was experienced.

Where Are We Dying? Ethnic Differences in Place of Death Among New Zealanders Dying of Cancer.

PURPOSEAround a third of people with cancer will die outside of their preferred place of death, with substantial variation occurring between and within countries in terms of place of death. Here, we examine place of death within the New Zealand cancer context, with specific focus on differences between Indigenous Māori and other ethnic groups.METHODSUsing national-level data, we identified all those who died in New Zealand between 2007 and 2018 of cancer (N = 107,373), stratified by ethnicity and cancer type, and linked these patients to national health and mortality records. We then described the crude and age-standardized proportions of cancer deaths by location separately by ethnic group, and conducted logistic regression to compare odds of death within a given location between ethnic groups.RESULTSAfter adjusting for age, sex, and deprivation, we found that Māori people with cancer are more likely to die in a private residence than Europeans (46% v 26%; odds ratio [OR] 2.45; 95% CI, 2.36 to 2.55), and also somewhat more likely to die in hospital (27% v 23%; OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.32). Commensurately, Māori are less likely to die in either hospice inpatient unit (14% v 27%; OR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.51) or residential care (12% v 30%; OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.59). Pacific patients generally follow the same pattern as Māori patients. These findings were largely repeated across cancer types, with some variation in the magnitude not overall pattern.CONCLUSIONIt remains unclear whether these differences reflect differences in preferences for place of death between ethnic groups, or whether they reflect differences in access to appropriate supportive care. Further research is required to examine these differences in greater detail.

Benzodiazepine Use and Morbidity-Mortality Outcomes in a Geriatric Palliative Care Unit: A Retrospective Review

Introduction: Patients often experience delirium at the end of life. Benzodiazepine use may be associated with an increased risk of developing delirium. Alternate medications used in conjunction with benzodiazepines may serve as an independent precipitant of delirium. The aim is to understand the role of benzodiazepines in precipitating delirium and advanced mortality in palliative care population at the end of life. Methods: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted at a hospice and palliative care inpatient unit between the periods of June 2017–December 2017 and October 2017–November 2018. It included patients in hospice and palliative care inpatient units who received a benzodiazepine and those who did not. Patient characteristics, as well as Palliative Performance Scale score, diagnosis, and occurrence of admission, terminal, and/or recurrent delirium, were collected and analyzed. Results: Use of a benzodiazepine was not significantly associated with overall mortality nor cause-specific death without terminal delirium rate. However, it was significantly associated with higher cause-specific death with terminal delirium rate and a higher recurrent delirium rate. Discussion: This retrospective chart review suggests an association between benzodiazepine use and specific states of delirium and cause-specific death. However, it does not provide strong evidence on the use of this drug, especially at the end of life, as it pertains to the overall mortality rate. Suggested is a contextual approach to the use of benzodiazepines and the need to consider Palliative Performance Scale score and goals of care in the administration of this drug at varying periods during patient length of stay.

Treatment of Positive Urine Cultures at End-of-Life and the Effect on Terminal Delirium Management.

Background: The decision to initiate antibiotics in hospice patients that are very near end-of-life is a complex ethical and stewardship decision. Antibiotics may be ordered to improve urinary tract infection-related symptoms, such as delirium. However, infection symptoms may be managed using antipsychotics, antipyretics, antispasmodics, and analgesics instead. Currently, there are no studies that compare symptom management between those who receive antibiotics and those who do not. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients admitted to a hospice inpatient unit. Charts were included if the patient was admitted for delirium and had a Palliative Performance Scale score ≤40%, the urine culture was positive for organism growth, and the patient died while in the HIU. Clinical and demographic data was collected. Medication use was tallied for the 5 days prior to the date of death. Results: Sixty-one charts met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-five patients received antibiotics (ABX+) and 26 did not (ABX-). There was no difference in any medication consumption between groups during the 5 days prior to death. The ABX+ group died 8.2 days after obtaining the urine sample vs 6 days (P =0.046). The ABX+ group had more documented urinary tract-specific infection symptoms (66% vs 38%, P =0.042). More than half of antibiotic courses were discontinued prematurely. Conclusion: The results of this study do not show a difference in overall medication consumption between groups, which suggests that antibiotics may not help improve terminal delirium symptoms in those with a suspected urinary tract infection at end-of-life.

Evaluating the specialist palliative care clinical nurse specialist role in an acute hospital setting: a mixed methods sequential explanatory study

BackgroundSpecial palliative care is provided in a range of settings including a patient’s home (their primary place of dwelling), a hospice in-patient unit, or an acute hospital. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of the specialist in palliative care clinical nurse specialist (SPC CNS) role in an acute hospital setting.MethodsThis study was conducted using a mixed methods sequential explanatory approach in two phases; phase 1 involved completion of a study questionnaire (n = 121) and phase 2 involved part-taking in a focus group (n = 6) or individual interview (n = 4).ResultsPhase 1 results indicated that respondents held positive attitudes towards the Specialist Palliative Care Clinical Nurses Specialist (SPC CNS) in relation to clinical care, education and patient advocacy. Phase 2 qualitative findings identified the importance of the role in terms of symptom management, education and support.ConclusionsThis study provides an evaluation of a SPC CNS role since it was established in an acute hospital setting. The evidence indicates that there is a varied understanding of the role of the SPC CNS. The role was seen as an important one particularly in terms of referrals to and support provided by the SPC CNS, as well as recognition of the importance of the role is providing ongoing education to staff.