Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Research Articles

Abstract 6875: PIM kinases alter the prostate tumor immune microenvironment

Abstract Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in American men. While prostate cancer patients typically respond to androgen-deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI), and/or taxane chemotherapy, patients inevitably develop resistance, and the disease progresses to an untreatable and lethal form known as castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Immunotherapy has changed the treatment paradigm for many types of cancer; however, immune checkpoint inhibitors have not shown clinical benefits in CRPC. Clinical and preclinical evidence indicates that this lack of efficacy can largely be attributed to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) secrete factors that promote tumor progression and suppress antitumor immunity, making them a promising therapeutic target. The Proviral Integration site for Moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM) kinases are serine/threonine kinases that are overexpressed in prostate cancer. PIM regulates many signaling pathways that promote cell proliferation and survival. However, how PIM kinase alters the prostate tumor immune microenvironment and impacts immunotherapy resistance is not well understood. We analyzed primary prostate and metastatic lymph node samples from treatment-naive metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer samples with PIM1/PIM2/PIM3-high and -low expression were classified by top and bottom quartile, respectively. PIM high tumors had higher expression of immunostimulatory genes (IL1β, TNF, and TNFSF13), increased infiltration of M2 macrophages, B cells, and NK Cells, and a higher T cell inflamed score compared to PIM-low tumors. Our results demonstrate that PIM overexpressing prostate tumors display increased inflammation and infiltration of immunosuppressive immune cells, including M2 macrophages. Due to the changes observed in inflammation, we hypothesized that PIM kinase may regulate macrophage inflammatory signaling. We treated bone marrow derived macrophages with a PIM kinase inhibitor and showed that PIM inhibition suppresses inflammasome signaling and the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-1β. Chronic inflammation can lead to the recruitment of TAMs, further promoting resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Utilizing a syngeneic mouse model of prostate cancer, we demonstrated that PIM inhibition in combination with immune checkpoint blockade synergistically decreased tumor growth. Furthermore, immunoprofiling demonstrated that combination treatment enhances T cell activity. Overall, our results suggest that PIM kinase plays an important role in regulating the prostate tumor immune microenvironment and that PIM kinase may be a potential target to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Citation Format: Amber N. Clements, Kai Sutterby, Sachin Kumar Deshmukh, Sharon Wu, Joanne Xiu, Alex Farrell, Milan Radovich, Chadi Nabhan, Elisabeth I. Heath, Rana R. McKay, Alejandro Recio-Boiles, Noel A. Warfel. PIM kinases alter the prostate tumor immune microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6875.

Lower baseline testosterone level is related to earlier development of castration resistance in metastatic prostate cancer: a multi-center cohort study.

In the era of concurrent combination therapy in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer, the impact of the testosterone level before initiating androgen deprivation therapy on treatment outcome is still uncertain. We aimed to investigate its effect on time-to-castration-resistance in a metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer cohort. This is a multi-center retrospective study of 5 databases from China, Japan, Austria and Spain including 258 metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients with androgen deprivation therapy initiated between 2002 and 2021. Baseline testosterone was divided into high and low groups using 12 nmol/L as cutoff level. Primary outcome was time-to-castration-resistance. Secondary outcomes were survival functions. Kaplan-Meier method was employed to evaluate the correlation between baseline testosterone and time-to-castration-resistance. Subgroup analysis was performed to elucidate the effect of upfront combination-therapy and metastatic volume. Median age was 72 years. Median follow-up time was 31 months. Median pre-treatment prostate-specific-antigen level was 161 ng/mL. Majority of case were graded as International-Society-of-Urological-Pathology grade 5 (63.6%). 57.8% patients had high volume disease and 69.0% received upfront combination treatment. 44.6% of the cohort developed castration-resistance. The low testosterone group demonstrated shorter mean-time-to-castration-resistance (19.0 vs 22.4 months, p=0.031). The variance was more significant in patients without combination therapy (13.2 vs 26.3 months, p=0.015). Cancer-specific and overall survival were inferior in the low baseline testosterone level group without receiving combination therapy (p=0.001). Lower pre-treatment testosterone level is correlated to shorter time-to-castration resistance and worse survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients without upfront combination therapy. Those with low baseline testosterone should be encouraged to adopt combination therapy to delay progression.

Disease volume and risk subgroup analyses for darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel in the phase III ARASENS: should triplet therapy become standard of care in certain metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients?

Disease volume and risk subgroup analyses for darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel in the phase III ARASENS: should triplet therapy become standard of care in certain metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients?

A potential biomarker of radiosensitivity in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with combination external beam radiotherapy and radium-223

PurposeThe ADRRAD trial reported the safety and feasibility of the combination of external beam radiotherapy and radium-223 in the treatment of de novo bone metastatic prostate. This study aimed to determine if any biomarkers predictive of response to these treatments could be identified. Experimental design30 patients with newly diagnosed bone metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer were recruited to the ADRRAD trial. Blood samples were taken pre-treatment, before cycles 2 to 6 of radium-223, and 8 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Mononuclear cells were isolated and DNA damage was assessed at all timepoints. ResultsDNA damage was increased in all patients during treatment, with bigger increases in foci observed in patients who relapsed late compared to those who relapsed early. Increases in DNA damage during the radium-223 only cycles of treatment were specifically related to response in these patients. Analysis of hematology counts also showed bigger decreases in red blood cell and hemoglobin counts in patients who experienced later biochemical relapse. ConclusionsWhile some patients responded to this combination treatment, others relapsed within one year of treatment initiation. This study identifies a biomarker based approach that may be useful in predicting which patients will respond to treatment, by monitoring both increases in DNA damage above baseline levels in circulating lymphocytes and decreases in red blood cell and hemoglobin counts during treatment.

Use of WB-MRI to Evaluate the Distribution of Tumour Burden after Initial Systemic Therapy in High Volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients

Use of WB-MRI to Evaluate the Distribution of Tumour Burden after Initial Systemic Therapy in High Volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients

Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

This umbrella review focused on evaluating the efficacy and adverse events of the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients receiving any treatment regimens, including ADT alone or combination treatments. This study conducted an umbrella review following the PRISMA 2020 checklist, aiming to summarize the available studies to evaluate the efficacy of medical treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. A literature search was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) that included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2023. This study summarized their findings, evaluated overlapping data (i.e., the same RCTs were included in >one SRMA), tested for excessive significance (i.e., observed number of statistically significant studies > expected number by chance) and assessed the quality of the studies. A total of 4191 studies were identified, but only 27 were included. Among those 27 studies, 12 were network meta-analyses and 15 were direct meta-analyses. Most studies showed no statistically significant difference in overall mortality among GnRH agonists, antagonists and bilateral orchiectomy. Combination treatment is more beneficial than ADT alone in both OS and PFS outcomes with more adverse events. Nevertheless, there is no OS advantage of any combination regimen over the others. Combination treatments demonstrated clear benefits in OS and PFS over ADT alone with more AEs. Further studies are needed to compare among combination treatments.

Promising Therapeutic Activity of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer : A Pilot Experience.

177 Lu-PSMA-617 has been shown to improve survival outcomes in patients with end-stage metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, data in earlier lines remain limited. In this study, we intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with synchronous high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients with synchronous high-volume metastases (defined as ≥4 skeletal metastases with ≥1 extra-axial site or any visceral metastasis) showing high PSMA expression on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and ineligible/unwilling for conventional chemohormonal treatment options were selected. Approximately, ~5.55-7.4 GBq of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 was administered intravenously at 8-12 weeks intervals, up to 6 cycles. All patients underwent concomitant androgen deprivation therapy/orchiectomy. The outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving an undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (ie, ≤0.2 ng/mL) at any time point after therapy, best PSA response rate, objective radiographic response rate, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Ten patients with high-volume mHSPC received a median cumulative activity of 32.4 GBq (range, 7.4-44.4) of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 over 1-6 cycles. Five patients (50%) achieved an undetectable PSA with 9 patients (90%) showing a ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline. Nine patients underwent radiological follow-up, of which 7 (77.8%) had an objective response. The median radiographic progression-free survival was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 18-30), whereas the median overall survival was not reached. None of the patients had any grade 3/4 adverse event. 177 Lu-PSMA-617 seems to be a promising efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with synchronous high-volume mHSPC.

Examining the Relationship and Prognostic Significance of Cell-Free DNA Levels and the PSMA-Positive Tumor Volume in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective-Prospective [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Study.

Functional imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands has emerged as the standard imaging method for prostate cancer (PCA). In parallel, the analysis of blood-derived, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been shown to be a promising quantitative biomarker of PCA aggressiveness and patient outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship and prognostic value of cfDNA concentrations and the PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) in men with PCA undergoing [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Methods: We recruited 148 men with histologically proven PCA (mean age, 70.7 ± 7.7 y) who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (184.9 ± 18.9 MBq) and blood sampling between March 2019 and August 2021. Among these, 74 (50.0%) had hormone-sensitive PCA and 74 (50.0%) had castration-resistant PCA (CRPC). All patients provided written informed consent before blood sample collection and imaging. The cfDNA was extracted and quantified, and PSMA-expressing tumor lesions were delineated to extract the PSMA-TVs. The Spearman coefficient assessed correlations between PSMA-TV and cfDNA concentrations and cfDNA's relation with clinical parameters. The Kruskal-Wallis test examined the mean cfDNA concentration differences based on PSMA-TV quartiles for significantly correlated patient groups. Log-rank and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the prognostic significance of high and low cfDNA and PSMA-TV levels for overall survival. Results: Weak positive correlations were found between cfDNA concentration and PSMA-TV in the overall group (r = 0.16, P = 0.049) and the CRPC group (r = 0.31, P = 0.007) but not in hormone-sensitive PCA patients (r = -0.024, P = 0.837). In the CRPC cohort, cfDNA concentrations significantly differed between PSMA-TV quartiles 4 and 1 (P = 0.002) and between quartiles 4 and 2 (P = 0.016). Survival outcomes were associated with PSMA-TV (P < 0.0001, P = 0.004) but not cfDNA (P = 0.174, P = 0.12), as per the log-rank and Cox regression analysis. Conclusion: These findings suggest that cfDNA might serve as a biomarker of advanced, aggressive CRPC but does not reliably reflect total tumor burden or prognosis. In comparison, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT provides a highly granular and prognostic assessment of tumor burden across the spectrum of PCA disease progression.

Comparison of Digital versus Analog 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Performance in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence after Radical Treatment

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the favorable characteristics of novel digital PET/CT (dPET) scanners compared to analog systems (aPET) could translate into an improved disease localization in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with early biochemical recurrence/persistence (BCR/BCP). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 440 consecutive analog (n = 311) or digital (n = 129) 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans performed in hormone-sensitive ADT-free PCa patients with early-BCR/BCP (PSA at PET ≤ 2.0 ng/mL), previously treated with radical intent (radical-prostatectomy/radiotherapy). dPET showed a higher positivity rate compared to aPET (48.8% [63/129] vs. 37.3% [116/311], p = 0.03), despite the slightly lower median PSA value of the dPET cohort (0.33 [IQR: 0.26–0.61] vs. 0.55 [IQR: 0.40–0.85] ng/mL, p &lt; 0.01). dPET detection rate was higher in both PSA ranges 0.2–0.5 ng/mL (39.0% [32/82] vs. 25.2% [34/135], p = 0.03) and 0.5–1.0 ng/mL (63.2% [24/38] vs. 40.8% [53/130], p = 0.02), but not for PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/mL. dPET detected a higher per patient median number of pathologic findings (PSMA-RADS ≥ 3) and multi-metastatic cases (&gt;3 lesions) among N1/M1-positive scans (21.7% [10/46] vs. 8.6% [9/105], p = 0.03). Moreover, the proportion of uncertain findings among pathological lesions was significantly lower for dPET than aPET (24.4% [39/160] vs. 38.5% [60/156], p = 0.008). Overall, 68Ga-PSMA-11 dPET showed a better performance compared to aPET, resulting in a higher scan-positivity rate, a higher number of detected pathological lesions, and a lower rate of uncertain findings.

P107 - A network meta-analysis on the safety of systemic treatments in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients

P107 - A network meta-analysis on the safety of systemic treatments in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients

P113 - Real-world prostate-specific antigen response and outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with apalutamide: a multicentric study

P113 - Real-world prostate-specific antigen response and outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with apalutamide: a multicentric study

Real-world prostate-specific antigen reduction and survival outcomes of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with apalutamide: An observational, retrospective, and multicentre study.

Backgroundetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treatment has changed drastically during the last years with the emergence of androgen receptor–targeted agents (ARTAs). ARTA combined with androgen deprivation therapy has demonstrated better oncological and survival outcomes in these patients. However, the optimal choice among different ARTAs remains uncertain due to their analogous efficacy. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to describe prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and oncological outcomes of patients with mHSPC treated with apalutamide. Material and methodsMedical records from three different hospitals in Spain were used to conduct this study. Patients diagnosed with mHSPC and under apalutamide treatment were included between March 2021 and January 2023. Data regarding PSA response, overall survival (OS), and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were collected and stratified by metastasis volume, timing, and stating. Results193 patients were included; 34.2% of patients were de novo mHSPC, and the majority was classified as m1b. The 18-month OS and rPFS were 92.5% and 88.9%, respectively. Patients with PSA levels ≤0.2 ng/ml showcased an 18-month OS rate of 98.7%, contrasting with 65.3% for those with PSA >0.2 ng/ml. Similar trends emerged for rPFS (97.4% and 53.7%, respectively). When differentiating between low-volume and high-volume metastasis, the OS rate stood at 98.4% and 80.7%, respectively, while the rPFS rates were 93% and 81.6%, respectively. No significant differences were found between groups stratified by metastasis timing. ConclusionThis real-world study on patients with mHSPC treated with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy revealed robust oncological outcomes, aligning with the emerging evidence. The study's hallmark finding highlights the significance of rapid and deep PSA response as a predictor of improved oncological and survival outcomes.

1791P Molecular profiling and prognostic relevance of low PTEN expression in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients

1791P Molecular profiling and prognostic relevance of low PTEN expression in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients

Real-world evidence of outcomes of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with metastasis-directed therapy.

To investigate characteristics and outcomes of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients undergoing metastases-directed therapy (MDT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify mHSPC patients who underwent EBRT as MDT between 12/2019 and 12/2022. Main outcomes consisted of progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and overall mortality (OM). Oligometastatic was defined as ≤3 metastases and bone and/or lymph node deposits were treated with conventional doses up to 54 Gy or with hypofractionated stereotactic regimes of median 24 Gy (20-27 Gy). Overall, 37 patients treated with EBRT as MDT were identified. The median follow-up was 13 months. Median age at MDT was 71 years and 84% exhibited ECOG performance status 0. The median baseline PSA at diagnosis was 10 ng/mL. Overall, primary local therapy consisted of radical prostatectomy (65%), followed by external beam radiation therapy to the prostate (11%), focal therapy (8%), and palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (5%). Overall, 32% exhibited de novo oligometastatic mHSPC. Bone metastases were present in 78% versus 19% lymph node metastases versus 3% both. The distribution of targeted oligo-metastases was 62% versus 38% for respectively one metastasis versus more than one metastasis. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was combined with MDT in 84%. Moreover, 19% received combination therapy with apalutamide/enzalutamide and 12% with abiraterone or docetaxel. The median time to mCRPC was 50 months. In incidence analyses, 13% developed mCRPC after 24 months. OM after 24 months was 15% in mHSPC patients receiving MDT. Significant OM differences were observed after stratification into targeted metastatic burden (<0.05). No high-grade adverse events were recorded during MDT. Our real-world data suggest that MDT represents a safe treatment option for well-selected oligometastatic mHSPC patients.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 7 treatments in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a public-payer perspective.

Recently, several new treatment regimens have been approved for treating metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, building on androgen deprivation therapy alone. These include docetaxel androgen deprivation therapy, abiraterone acetate-prednisone androgen deprivation therapy, apalutamide androgen deprivation therapy, enzalutamide androgen deprivation therapy, darolutamide-docetaxel androgen deprivation therapy, and abiraterone-prednisone androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel. There are no validated predictive biomarkers for choosing a specific regimen. The goal of this study was to conduct a health economic outcome evaluation to determine the optimal treatment from the US public sector (Veterans Affairs). We developed a partitioned survival model in which metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients transitioned between 3 health states (progression free, progressive disease to castrate resistance state, and death) at monthly intervals based on Weibull survival model estimated from published Kaplan-Meier curves using a Bayesian network meta-analysis of 7 clinical trials (7208 patients). The effectiveness outcome in our model was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Cost input parameters included initial and subsequent treatment costs and costs for terminal care and for managing grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events and were obtained from the Federal Supply Schedule and published literature. Average 10-year costs ranged from $34 349 (androgen deprivation therapy) to $658 928 (darolutamide-docetaxel androgen deprivation therapy) and mean QALYs ranged from 3.25 (androgen deprivation therapy) to 4.57 (enzalutamide androgen deprivation therapy). Treatment strategies docetaxel androgen deprivation therapy, enzalutamide androgen deprivation therapy docetaxel, apalutamide androgen deprivation therapy, and darolutamide-docetaxel androgen deprivation therapy were eliminated because of dominance (ie, they were more costly and less effective than other strategies). Of the remaining strategies, abiraterone acetate-prednisone androgen deprivation therapy was the most cost-effective strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios = $21 247/QALY). Our simulation model found abiraterone acetate-prednisone androgen deprivation therapy to be an optimal first-line treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer from a public (Veterans Affairs) payer perspective.

Efficacy of Systemic Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients With Visceral Metastasis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis.

There are limited pooled data showing the impact of visceral metastasis on oncologic outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with combination systemic therapies. We aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy of combination systemic therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with or without visceral metastasis. Three databases were queried in July 2022 for randomized, controlled trials analyzing metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with combination systemic therapy (androgen receptor signaling inhibitor and/or docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy) to standard of care. We analyzed the association between presence of visceral metastases and efficacy of systemic therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. The main and secondary outcomes of interest were overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. Formal meta-analysis using fixed-effect model and network meta-analysis using random-effect model with a frequentist approach were conducted. We followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) guidelines. Overall, 12 and 8 randomized, controlled trials were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitor to standard of care improved overall survival in patients with visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94) as well as in those without (pooled HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.72; no differences in both across- and within-trial approach; P = .13 and P = .06, respectively). On the other hand, the progression-free survival benefit from androgen receptor signaling inhibitor + androgen deprivation therapy was significantly lower in patients with visceral metastasis using across-trial approach (P = .03), while it did not reach statistical significance using within-trial approach (P = .14). Analysis of treatment ranking in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer showed that darolutamide + docetaxel + androgen deprivation therapy had the highest likelihood of improved overall survival irrespective of visceral metastasis. In post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitor to androgen deprivation therapy significantly improved overall survival in both patients with visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98) and those without (pooled HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55-0.72). No randomized, controlled trials reported the differential oncologic outcomes stratified by lung vs liver metastases. Despite aggressive clinical behavior and worse trajectory of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with visceral metastasis, the effectiveness of novel systemic therapies is similar in both metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with and without visceral metastasis. Further well-designed studies with detailed visceral metastatic sites and number will enrich the clinical decision-making.

RWD160 Race-Stratified Treatment Patterns Among Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients in US Community Oncology Practice Setting

Study aim was to describe the variation of real-world treatment patterns by race among metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients treated at five community cancer centers in the US.

Abstract 3370: Liquid biopsy approaches to determine tumor cell heterogeneity in advanced prostate cancer

Abstract Aggressive variants of prostate cancer (AVPC) emerge from prostate adenocarcinoma following enduring therapeutic pressure. They grow independent of the androgen receptor, progress rapidly and can show traits of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation. As progression to AVPC is not well detected by prostate specific antigen monitoring, new biomarkers are urgently needed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in combination with gene expression analysis of NE genes to identify AVPC patients with neuroendocrine traits. Blood samples were collected from patients suffering from AVPC (n=78, including 25 patients with histological evidence of NEPC) as well as from patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) as controls (n=12) at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. CTC counts were determined by CellSearch analysis. In parallel, CTCs were immuno-magnetically enriched using the AdnaTest and bulk gene expression of prostate-specific and NE genes was analyzed by semi-quantitative PCR. From a subset of patients, CTCs were additionally enriched by Parsortix to compare gene expression of CTCs with EpCAM-based or size-based CTC enrichment. Using CellSearch analysis, CTCs were found in 88.9 % of AVPC patients. CTC counts ranged between 0 – 20,000 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood with a median of 32 CTCs/7.5 ml. Similarly, 81.8 % of NEPC patients were positive for CTCs with a median count of 35 CTCs/7.5 ml (range 0-13,000). In contrast, CTCs were found in only 50 % of HSPC patients at lower concentrations (median count of 0.5 CTCs/7.5 ml, range 0-34). CTC counts were significantly elevated in AVPC and NEPC patients compared to HSPC (p = 0.002, p = 0.012), but no significant differences were found between AVPC and NEPC samples.In 93.8 % of AVPC samples, CTCs expressed prostate-specific genes such as KLK3 or PSMA. At least one of the NE transcripts was detected in 37.5 % of AVPC patients. In CTCs from NEPC patients, the positivity for prostate markers was significantly reduced to 66.6 % (p = 0.01) and the positivity for NE markers was increased to 61.1 %. A random Forrest model trained on all analyzed transcripts allowed for a distinction of HSPC and NEPC with an AUC of 79.5 %. Comparison of CTC enrichment strategies in a subset of 13 patients showed similar NE marker detection by size-based enrichment (53.8 % NE-positive) compared to the AdnaTest (61.5 % NE-positive). AVPC and NEPC patients show a high CTC burden that will allow subsequent molecular analyses, and CTC counts allowed a distinction between blood samples from HSPC and NEPC patients. Gene expression analysis revealed a high degree of inter-patient heterogeneity for neuroendocrine-specific transcripts with a reduction of prostate markers in NEPC patients. Future molecular characterization and longitudinal monitoring of CTCs will shed more light on the evolution of AVPC and NEPC. Citation Format: Lina Merkens, Sarah Greimeier, Sabine Riethdorf, Klaus Pantel, Gunhild von Amsberg, Stefan Werner. Liquid biopsy approaches to determine tumor cell heterogeneity in advanced prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3370.

Randomized phase II trial in prostate cancer with hormone-sensitive OligometaSTatic relapse: Combining stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and durvalumab (POSTCARD GETUG P13): Study protocol

BackgroundAs in other solid tumors, increasing evidence indicates that patients diagnosed with a limited number of prostate cancer metastases, so-called oligometastases, have a better prognosis than patients with extensive metastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is now considered an option in this population.Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1) are targeted by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preclinical studies have shown that the tumor immune microenvironment changes when combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy, especially with hypofractionated radiotherapy.The oligometastatic setting appears to be the most relevant clinical situation for evaluating the immune response generated by radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with an intact immune system.We hypothesize that durvalumab will enhance the immune response following SBRT targeting oligometastatic lesions. Our purpose is to demonstrate, via a randomized 2:1 phase II trial, that SBRT (3 fractions) with durvalumab in oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients would improve progression-free survival in patients with prostate cancer with up to 5 metastases compared to patients who exclusively received SBRT. MethodsThis is a multicentric randomized phase II study in French academic hospitals. Patients with prostate cancer and up to 5 metastases (lymph node and/or bone) were randomized into a 2:1 ratio between Arm A (experimental group), corresponding to durvalumab and SBRT to the metastases, and Arm B (control group), corresponding to SBRT alone to the metastases. The study aims to accrue a total of 96 patients within 3 years. The primary endpoint is two-year progression-free survival and secondary endpoints include androgen deprivation therapy-free survival, quality of life, toxicity, prostate cancer specific survival, overall survival, and immune response. DiscussionThe expected benefit for the patients in the experimental arm is longer life expectancy with acceptable toxicity. We also expect our study to provide data for better understanding the synergy between immunotherapy and radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Kidney absorbed radiation doses for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T determined by 3D clinical dosimetry.

For prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT), [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T are the currently preferred compounds. Recent preclinical studies suggested ~30x higher kidney absorbed dose for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T compared to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, which may lead to an increased risk of kidney toxicity. We performed two single-centre, prospective dosimetry studies with either [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, using an identical dosimetry protocol. We evaluated the absorbed doses of both 177 Lu-labelled radioligands in human kidneys. 3D SPECT/computed tomography (CT) imaging of the kidneys was performed after PSMA-RLT in cancer patients with PSMA-positive disease and an adequate glomerular filtration rate (≥50 mL/min). Ten metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients (mHSPC) were treated with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and 10 advanced salivary gland cancer (SGC) patients were treated with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. SPECT/CT imaging was performed at five timepoints (1 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 168 h post-injection). In mHSPC patients, SPECT/CT imaging was performed after cycles 1 and 2 (cumulative activity: 9 GBq) and in SGC patients only after cycle 1 (activity: 7.4 GBq). Kidney absorbed dose was calculated using organ-based dosimetry. The median kidney absorbed dose was 0.49 Gy/GBq (range: 0.34-0.66) and 0.73 Gy/GBq (range: 0.42-1.31) for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, respectively (independent samples t test; P = 0.010). This study shows that the kidney absorbed dose for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T differs, with a ~1.5x higher median kidney absorbed dose for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. This difference in the clinical setting is considerably smaller than observed in preclinical studies and may not hamper treatments with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T.