Hopf Monad Research Articles

Slack Hopf monads

Hopf monads generalise Hopf algebras. They clarify several aspects of the theory of Hopf algebras and capture several related structures such as weak Hopf algebras and Hopf algebroids. However, important parts of Hopf algebra theory are not reached by Hopf monads, most noticeably Drinfeld's quasi-Hopf algebras. In this paper we introduce a generalisation of Hopf monads, that we call slack Hopf monads. This generalisation retains a clean theory and is flexible enough to encompass quasi-Hopf algebras as examples. A slack Hopf monad is a colax magma monad T on a magma category C such that the forgetful functor UT:CT→C ‘slackly’ preserves internal Homs. We give a number of different descriptions of slack Hopf monads, and study special cases such as slack Hopf monads on cartesian categories and k-linear exact slack Hopf monads on Vectk, that is comagma algebras such that a modified fusion operator is invertible. In particular, we characterise quasi-Hopf algebras in terms of slackness.

Traced Monads and Hopf Monads

A traced monad is a monad on a traced symmetric monoidal category that lifts the traced symmetric monoidal structure to its Eilenberg-Moore category. A long-standing question has been to provide a characterization of traced monads without explicitly mentioning the Eilenberg-Moore category. On the other hand, a symmetric Hopf monad is a symmetric bimonad whose fusion operators are invertible. For compact closed categories, symmetric Hopf monads are precisely the kind of monads that lift the compact closed structure to their Eilenberg-Moore categories. Since compact closed categories and traced symmetric monoidal categories are closely related, it is a natural question to ask what is the relationship between Hopf monads and traced monads. In this paper, we introduce trace-coherent Hopf monads on traced monoidal categories, which can be characterized without mentioning the Eilenberg-Moore category. The main theorem of this paper is that a symmetric Hopf monad is a traced monad if and only if it is a trace-coherent Hopf monad. We provide many examples of trace-coherent Hopf monads, such as those induced by cocommutative Hopf algebras or any symmetric Hopf monad on a compact closed category. We also explain how for traced Cartesian monoidal categories, trace-coherent Hopf monads can be expressed using the Conway operator, while for traced coCartesian monoidal categories, any trace-coherent Hopf monad is an idempotent monad. We also provide separating examples of traced monads that are not Hopf monads, as well as symmetric Hopf monads that are not trace-coherent.

Davydov-Yetter cohomology, comonads and Ocneanu rigidity

Davydov-Yetter cohomology classifies infinitesimal deformations of tensor categories and of tensor functors. Our first result is that Davydov-Yetter cohomology for finite tensor categories is equivalent to the cohomology of a comonad arising from the central Hopf monad. This has several applications: First, we obtain a short and conceptual proof of Ocneanu rigidity. Second, it allows to use standard methods from comonad cohomology theory to compute Davydov-Yetter cohomology for a family of non-semisimple finite-dimensional Hopf algebras generalizing Sweedler's four dimensional Hopf algebra.

Antipodes, preantipodes and Frobenius functors

We prove that a quasi-bialgebra admits a preantipode if and only if the associated free quasi-Hopf bimodule functor is Frobenius, if and only if the related (opmonoidal) monad is a Hopf monad. The same results hold in particular for a bialgebra, tightening the connection between Hopf and Frobenius properties.

On Hopf Adjunctions, Hopf Monads and Frobenius-Type Properties

Let $U$ be a strong monoidal functor between monoidal categories. If it has both a left adjoint $L$ and a right adjoint $R$, we show that the pair $(R,L)$ is a linearly distributive functor and $(U,U)\dashv (R,L)$ is a linearly distributive adjunction, if and only if $L\dashv U$ is a Hopf adjunction and $U\dashv R$ is a coHopf adjunction. We give sufficient conditions for a strong monoidal $U$ which is part of a (left) Hopf adjunction $L\dashv U$, to have as right adjoint a twisted version of the left adjoint $L$. In particular, the resulting adjunction will be (left) coHopf. One step further, we prove that if $L$ is precomonadic and $L\mathbf I$ is a Frobenius monoid (where $\mathbf I$ denotes the unit object of the monoidal category), then $L\dashv U\dashv L$ is an ambidextrous adjunction, and $L$ is a Frobenius monoidal functor. We transfer these results to Hopf monads: we show that under suitable exactness assumptions, a Hopf monad $T$ on a monoidal category has a right adjoint which is also a Hopf comonad, if the object $T\mathbf I$ is dualizable as a free $T$-algebra. In particular, if $T\mathbf I$ is a Frobenius monoid in the monoidal category of $T$-algebras and $T$ is of descent type, then $T$ is a Frobenius monad and a Frobenius monoidal functor.

Quantum double of Hopf monads and categorical centers

The center Z(C) of an autonomous category C is monadic over C (if certain coends exist in C). The notion of a Hopf monad naturally arises if one tries to reconstruct the structure of Z(C) in terms of its monad Z: we show that Z is a quasitriangular Hopf monad on C and Z(C) is isomorphic to the braided category Z − C of Z-modules. More generally, let T be a Hopf monad on an autonomous category C. We construct a Hopf monad ZT on C, the centralizer of T , and a canonical distributive law Ω: TZT → ZTT . By Beck’s theory, this has two consequences. On one hand, DT = ZT ◦Ω T is a quasitriangular Hopf monad on C, called the double of T , and Z(T − C) DT − C as braided categories. As an illustration, we define the double D(A) of a Hopf algebra A in a braided autonomous category in such a way that the center of the category of A-modules is the braided category of D(A)-modules (generalizing the Drinfeld double). On the other hand, the canonical distributive law Ω also lifts ZT to a Hopf monad Z Ω T on T−C, and ZΩ T ( , T0) is the coend of T−C. For T = Z, this gives an explicit description of the Hopf algebra structure of the coend of Z(C) in terms of the structural morphisms of C. Such a description is useful in quantum topology, especially when C is a spherical fusion category, as Z(C) is then modular.

Hopf monads on monoidal categories

We define Hopf monads on an arbitrary monoidal category, extending the definition given in Bruguières and Virelizier (2007) [5] for monoidal categories with duals. A Hopf monad is a bimonad (or opmonoidal monad) whose fusion operators are invertible. This definition can be formulated in terms of Hopf adjunctions, which are comonoidal adjunctions with an invertibility condition. On a monoidal category with internal Homs, a Hopf monad is a bimonad admitting a left and a right antipode. Hopf monads generalize Hopf algebras to the non-braided setting. They also generalize Hopf algebroids (which are linear Hopf monads on a category of bimodules admitting a right adjoint). We show that any finite tensor category is the category of finite-dimensional modules over a Hopf algebroid. Any Hopf algebra in the center of a monoidal category C gives rise to a Hopf monad on C . The Hopf monads so obtained are exactly the augmented Hopf monads. More generally if a Hopf monad T is a retract of a Hopf monad P, then P is a cross product of T by a Hopf algebra of the center of the category of T-modules (generalizing the Radford–Majid bosonization of Hopf algebras). We show that the comonoidal comonad of a Hopf adjunction is canonically represented by a cocommutative central coalgebra. As a corollary, we obtain an extension of Sweedlerʼs Hopf module decomposition theorem to Hopf monads (in fact to the weaker notion of pre-Hopf monad).

Weak bimonads and weak Hopf monads

We define a weak bimonad as a monad T on a monoidal category M with the property that the Eilenberg–Moore category M T is monoidal and the forgetful functor M T → M is separable Frobenius. Whenever M is also Cauchy complete, a simple set of axioms is provided, that characterizes the monoidal structure of M T as a weak lifting of the monoidal structure of M . The relation to bimonads, and the relation to weak bimonoids in a braided monoidal category are revealed. We also discuss antipodes, obtaining the notion of weak Hopf monad.

Galois functors and entwining structures

Galois comodules over a coring can be characterised by properties of the relative injective comodules. They motivated the definition of Galois functors over some comonad (or monad) on any category and in the first section of the present paper we investigate the role of the relative injectives (projectives) in this context. Then we generalise the notion of corings (derived from an entwining of an algebra and a coalgebra) to the entwining of a monad and a comonad. Hereby a key role is played by the notion of a grouplike natural transformation g : I → G generalising the grouplike elements in corings. We apply the evolving theory to Hopf monads on arbitrary categories, and to opmonoidal monads with antipode on autonomous monoidal categories (named Hopf monads by Bruguières and Virelizier) which can be understood as an entwining of two related functors. As well known, for any set G the product G × − defines an endofunctor on the category of sets and this is a Hopf monad if and only if G allows for a group structure. In the final section the elements of this case are generalised to arbitrary categories with finite products leading to Galois objects in the sense of Chase and Sweedler.

Bimonads and Hopf monads on categories

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to develop a theory of bimonads and Hopf monads on arbitrary categories thus providing the possibility to transfer the essentials of the theory of Hopf algebras in vector spaces to more general settings. There are several extensions of this theory to monoidal categories which in a certain sense follow the classical trace. Here we do not pose any conditions on our base category but we do refer to the monoidal structure of the category of endofunctors on any category and by this we retain some of the combinatorial complexity which makes the theory so interesting. As a basic tool we use distributive laws between monads and comonads (entwinings) on : we define a bimonad on as an endofunctor B which is a monad and a comonad with an entwining λ : BB → BB satisfying certain conditions. This λ is also employed to define the category of (mixed) B-bimodules. In the classical situation, an entwining λ is derived from the twist map for vector spaces. Here this need not be the case but there may exist special distributive laws τ : BB → BB satisfying the Yang-Baxter equation (local prebraidings) which induce an entwining λ and lead to an extension of the theory of braided Hopf algebras.An antipode is defined as a natural transformation S : B → B with special properties. For categories with limits or colimits and bimonads B preserving them, the existence of an antipode is equivalent to B inducing an equivalence between and the category of B-bimodules. This is a general form of the Fundamental Theorem of Hopf algebras.Finally we observe a nice symmetry: If B is an endofunctor with a right adjoint R, then B is a (Hopf) bimonad if and only if R is a (Hopf) bimonad. Thus a k-vector space H is a Hopf algebra if and only if Homk(H,−) is a Hopf bimonad. This provides a rich source for Hopf monads not defined by tensor products and generalises the well-known fact that a finite dimensional k-vector space H is a Hopf algebra if and only if its dual H* = Homk(H,k) is a Hopf algebra. Moreover, we obtain that any set G is a group if and only if the functor Map(G,−) is a Hopf monad on the category of sets.

Hopf monads

We introduce and study Hopf monads on autonomous categories (i.e., monoidal categories with duals). Hopf monads generalize Hopf algebras to a non-braided (and non-linear) setting. In particular, any monoidal adjunction between autonomous categories gives rise to a Hopf monad. We extend many fundamental results of the theory of Hopf algebras (such as the decomposition of Hopf modules, the existence of integrals, Maschke's criterium of semisimplicity, etc.) to Hopf monads. We also introduce and study quasitriangular and ribbon Hopf monads (again defined in a non-braided setting).

Algebras Versus Coalgebras

Algebras and coalgebras are fundamental notions for large parts of mathematics. The basic constructions from universal algebra are now expressed in the language of categories and thus are accessible to classical algebraists and topologists as well as to logicians and computer scientists. Some of them have developed specialised parts of the theory and often reinvented constructions already known in a neighbouring area. One purpose of this survey is to show the connection between results from different fields and to trace a number of them back to some fundamental papers in category theory from the early 1970s. Another intention is to look at the interplay between algebraic and coalgebraic notions. Hopf algebras are one of the most interesting objects in this setting. While knowledge of algebras and coalgebras are folklore in general category theory, the notion of Hopf algebras is usually only considered for monoidal categories. In the course of the text we do suggest how to overcome this defect by defining a Hopf monad on an arbitrary category as a monad and comonad satisfying some compatibility conditions and inducing an equivalence between the base category and the category of the associated bimodules. For a set G, the endofunctor G× – on the category of sets shares these properties if and only if G admits a group structure. Finally, we report about the possibility of subsuming algebras and coalgebras in the notion of ( F , G )-dimodules associated to two functors \(F,G:\mathbb{A}\to \mathbb{B}\) between different categories. This observation, due to Tatsuya Hagino, was an outcome from the theory of categorical data types and may also be of use in classical algebra.

Monads on tensor categories

A Hopf monad is a monad on a tensor category, equipped with comparison maps relating the monad structure to the tensor structure. We study some general properties of such Hopf monads, their algebras and their Hopf algebras. In particular, we prove that for a given monad, there is a one-to-one correspondence between additional data making the monad into a Hopf monad on the one hand, and liftings of the tensor to the category of algebras on the other.

4712069 Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus including two orthogonal R.F. coils

Galois comodules over a coring can be characterised by properties of the relative injective comodules. They motivated the definition of Galois functors over some comonad (or monad) on any category and in the first section of the present paper we investigate the role of the relative injectives (projectives) in this context.Then we generalise the notion of corings (derived from an entwining of an algebra and a coalgebra) to the entwining of a monad and a comonad. Hereby a key role is played by the notion of a grouplike natural transformation g:I→G generalising the grouplike elements in corings. We apply the evolving theory to Hopf monads on arbitrary categories, and to opmonoidal monads with antipode on autonomous monoidal categories (named Hopf monads by Bruguières and Virelizier) which can be understood as an entwining of two related functors.As well known, for any set G the product G×− defines an endofunctor on the category of sets and this is a Hopf monad if and only if G allows for a group structure. In the final section the elements of this case are generalised to arbitrary categories with finite products leading to Galois objects in the sense of Chase and Sweedler.