Hookworm Infection In Children Research Articles

Efficacy, safety and acceptability of a new chewable formulation versus the solid tablet of mebendazole against hookworm infections in children: An open-label, randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundSoil-transmitted helminths (STHs) infect almost 1·5 billion people worldwide. The control of STH infections is based on preventive chemotherapy using either albendazole or mebendazole. Before being widely used, a sufficient body of evidence on efficacy, safety and acceptability is warranted for the new chewable child-friendly formulation of mebendazole that was recently developed.MethodsWe conducted a randomised controlled superiority trial in four primary schools and kindergartens on Pemba Island, Tanzania. We considered eligible children aged 3 to 12 years with a hookworm infection intensity of at least 50 eggs per gram (EPG) of stool and no chronic diseases. Participants were allocated to treatment arms (ratio 1:1) using a computer generated random sequence. Our primary outcome was geometric mean based egg reduction rate (ERR) against hookworm assessed 14–21 days post-treatment. This trial complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03995680 (June 24, 2019).Findings397 children were eligible and randomised into the solid (198) or chewable (199) tablet arms, of whom 393 were analysed. We found no significant difference between both formulations in terms of ERR (solid 70·8% versus chewable 68·5%, difference in ERRgeometric mean 2·3%-points, 95% CI -7·8 to 12·6, p = 0.65) and CR (11·2 versus 12·7%, 95% CI -4·9 to 7·9, p = 0.65) against hookworm infections. Adverse events were mild in both treatment arms.InterpretationsThough we could not demonstrate superiority in terms of efficacy of the new formulation, the difference between arms was small and therefore, the chewable formulation could be safely used as an alternative to swallowable tablets, in particular in young children who may have swallowing difficulties. This might help increase compliance and, consequently, enhance the effect of preventive chemotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Ascending Dosages of Tribendimidine Against Hookworm Infections in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The global strategy to control soil-transmitted helminthiasis is mainly focused on preventive chemotherapy with albendazole and mebendazole. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ascending tribendimidine doses against hookworm infections in African school-aged children, key information for the development of tribendimidine. We performed a single blind, randomized, controlled trial in Côte d'Ivoire between June and August 2017. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to placebo, 100, 200, or 400 mg tribendimidine. Cure rates (CRs, primary outcome) and egg reduction rates (ERRs) were determined 14-21 days after treatment. Clinical symptoms were assessed before treatment and adverse events monitored 3 and 24 hours posttreatment. CRs calculated for 130 children dose-dependently increased. The observed CRs were 20.6% (7/34), 21.2% (7/33), 38.7% (12/31), and 53.1% (17/32) for placebo, 100, 200, and 400 mg of tribendimidine, respectively. The Emax model predicted a placebo corrected net effect of 34.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-54.4) for the 400-mg tribendimidine dose. The ERRs (geometric mean) were 30.6% (95% CI, -24.7 to 64.1), 65.4% (95% CI, 24.5-85.9), 82.1% (95% CI, 58.4-92.5) and 92.2% (95% CI, 81.0-97.1) for placebo, 100, 200, and 400 mg tribendimidine, respectively. The Emax model predicted an ERR of 95% at 500 mg. Only mild adverse events and no abnormal biochemical parameters were observed. A 400-mg dose of tribendimidine yielded the highest efficacy and was well tolerated. Because children were mostly lightly infected, further investigations with tribendimidine against moderate/heavy hookworm infection are needed. The trial is registered at www.isrctn.com number ISRCTN81391471.

Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose versus a Multiple Dose Regimen of Mebendazole against Hookworm Infections in Children: A Randomised, Double-blind Trial

BackgroundSingle-dose mebendazole is widely used in preventive chemotherapy against the soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm and Trichuris trichiura, yet it shows limited efficacy against hookworm and T. trichiura infections. The use of adapted treatment regimens might provide a strategy to control and eliminate STH infections in STH-persistent settings. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the multiple dose mebendazole regimen (3 days 100 mg bid) versus a single dose of 500 mg mebendazole in a setting with high STH prevalence and high drug pressure. MethodsThis randomised, double-blind clinical trial took place in a primary school on Pemba Island, Tanzania, in school-aged children (6–12 years). Using a computer random number generator (block size 10), hookworm-positive children were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a single or multiple dose regimen of mebendazole by an independent statistician. Two stool samples were collected at baseline and follow-up (18 to 22 days after treatment) for Kato-Katz analysis. The primary outcome was cure rate (CR) against hookworm. Secondary outcomes were egg reduction rate (ERR) against hookworm, CRs and ERRs against A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura, and tolerability assessed 3, 24 and 48 h post-treatment. Participants, investigators, caregivers, outcome assessors and the trial statistician were blinded. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03245398. Findings93 children were assigned to each treatment arm. 185 children completed treatment and provided follow-up stool samples. CR against hookworm was significantly higher in the multiple dose (98%) than in the single dose arm (13%, OR 389.1, 95% CI 95.2 to 2885.7%, p < 0.001). 34 and 42 children reported mild adverse events in the single and multiple dose arms, respectively. The most common events were abdominal pain, headache and diarrhoea. InterpretationThe poor performance of single dose mebendazole against hookworm infections was confirmed, but the multiple dose treatment regimen of mebendazole showed high efficacy. Hence, multiple dose mebendazole might provide a treatment strategy in given epidemiological situations to boost control and elimination of STH infections. FundingPATH.

Modeling the economic and epidemiologic impact of hookworm vaccine and mass drug administration (MDA) in Brazil, a high transmission setting

BackgroundAlthough mass drug administration (MDA) has helped reduce morbidity attributed to soil-transmitted helminth infections in children, its limitations for hookworm infection have motivated the development of a human hookworm vaccine to both improve morbidity control and ultimately help block hookworm transmission leading to elimination. However, the potential economic and epidemiologic impact of a preventive vaccine has not been fully evaluated. MethodsWe developed a dynamic compartment model coupled to a clinical and economics outcomes model representing both the human and hookworm populations in a high transmission region of Brazil. Experiments simulated different implementation scenarios of MDA and vaccination under varying circumstances. ResultsConsidering only intervention costs, both annual MDA and vaccination were highly cost-effective (ICERs ≤$790/DALY averted) compared to no intervention, with vaccination resulting in lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs ≤$444/DALY averted). From the societal perspective, vaccination was economically dominant (i.e., less costly and more effective) versus annual MDA in all tested scenarios, except when vaccination was less efficacious (20% efficacy, 5 year duration) and MDA coverage was 75%. Increasing the vaccine's duration of protection and efficacy, and including a booster injection in adulthood all increased the benefits of vaccination (i.e., resulted in lower hookworm prevalence, averted more disability-adjusted life years, and saved more costs). Assuming its target product profile, a pediatric hookworm vaccine drastically decreased hookworm prevalence in children to 14.6% after 20 years, compared to 57.2% with no intervention and 54.1% with MDA. The addition of a booster in adulthood further reduced the overall prevalence from 68.0% to 36.0% and nearly eliminated hookworm infection in children. ConclusionUsing a human hookworm vaccine would be cost-effective and in many cases economically dominant, providing both health benefits and cost-savings. It could become a key technology in effecting control and elimination efforts for hookworm globally.

Identification of Ancylostoma ceylanicum in children from a tribal community in Tamil Nadu, India using a semi-nested PCR-RFLP tool.

It is generally assumed that hookworm infections in humans are caused by Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale. However, previous studies have also reported the presence of the animal hookworm A. ceylanicum in human stools. We determined hookworm infections in children in a tribal community in Tamil Nadu, India, using a semi-nested PCR-RFLP approach. The results indicate that human species account for a majority of the hookworm infections (N. americanus 39/41 [95%]; A. duodenale 6/41 [15%]), whereas the animal hookworm A. ceylanicum only accounts for a minority of the infections (5%; 2/41). The results emphasize the need to consider zoonotic ancylostomiasis while developing strategies to control hookworm infections.