Hookwire Group Research Articles

Unlocking the Potential of Computed Tomography-Guided Tracers in Pinpointing Lung Lesions during Surgery: A Collaborative Multi-Institutional Journey.

Background: Multiple techniques exist for the preoperative localization of small, deeply located solid or subsolid pulmonary nodules to guide limited thoracoscopic resection. This study aims to conduct a multi-institutional comparison of three different tomography-guided tracers' methods. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. All patients suitable for CT-guided tracers with microcoil (GROUP1, n = 58), hook wire (GROUP2, n = 86), or bioabsorbable hydrogel plug (GROUP3, n = 33) were scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection. Outcome variables: successful nodule localization, safety, and the feasibility of the tracers' placement. A χ2 test or Fisher's test for expected numbers less than five and a Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the categorical and continuous variables, respectively. For the power calculations, we used G*Power version 3.1.9.6. Results: One hundred seventy-seven patients underwent the localization and resection of 177 nodules detected with three different CT-guided tracers. A significant difference was recorded for cancer history (p = 0.030), respiratory function, Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.018), lesion type (p < 0.0001), distance from pleura surface (p < 0.0001), and time between preoperative CT-guided tracers and surgical procedures (p < 0.0001). Four post-procedural complications were recorded and in GROUP2, four cases of tracer dislocations occurred. Finally, hook wire group was associated with the shortest surgical time (93 min, p = 0.001). Conclusions: All methods were feasible and efficient, resulting in a 100% success rate for the microcoils and the bioabsorbable hydrogel plugs and a 94.2% success rate for the hook wires. Our results highlight the need to choose a technique that is less stressful for the patient and helps the surgeon by extending the approach to deep nodules and resecting over the course of several days from deployment.

CT-guided microcoil versus hook-wire localization of pulmonary nodule prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without fluoroscopic guidance

BackgroundBoth microcoils and hook-wires are commonly utilized for preoperative pulmonary nodule localization due to their convenience, but it remains unclear which one should be prioritized for recommendation.AimsTo compare the safety and efficacy of microcoils and hook-wires for pulmonary nodule localization.MethodsFrom January 2021 to December 2021, 310 consecutive patients (113 males and 197 females) with 341 pulmonary nodules who underwent CT-guided microcoil or hook-wire localization prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at our center were retrospectively included in this study. There were 161 patients in the microcoil group and 149 patients in the hook-wire group. The successful localization rate, complication rate, radiation exposure, and medical costs were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 341 pulmonary nodules were localized, with a success rate of 99% (180/184) in the microcoil group and 93% (146/157) in the hook-wire group, respectively. All patients successfully underwent VATS. Multivariate analysis revealed that hook-wire localization, shorter needle depth into the lung tissue and the longer waiting time from localization to VATS were the risk factors for the localization failure. The incidences of pneumothorax in the microcoil group and hook-wire group were 34.8% (56/161) and 34.9% (52/149), respectively (P = 0.983). The incidences of pneumorrhagia were 13% (24/184) and 46.5% (73/157), respectively (P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis revealed that hook-wire localization and greater depth of needle penetration into lung tissue were risk factors for pneumorrhagia.ConclusionMicrocoil localization of pulmonary nodules is superior to hook-wire localization in terms of efficacy and safety. This finding provides insight into priority and broader promotion of microcoil localization.

Presurgical computed tomography-guided localization of lung ground glass nodules: comparing hook-wire and indocyanine green

BackgroundPresurgical computed tomography (CT)-guided localization is frequently employed to reduce the thoracotomy conversion rate, while increasing the rate of successful sublobar resection of ground glass nodules (GGNs) via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In this study, we compared the clinical efficacies of presurgical CT-guided hook-wire and indocyanine green (IG)-based localization of GGNs.MethodsBetween January 2018 and December 2021, we recruited 86 patients who underwent CT-guided hook-wire or IG-based GGN localization before VATS resection in our hospital, and compared the clinical efficiency and safety of both techniques.ResultsA total of 38 patients with 39 GGNs were included in the hook-wire group, whereas 48 patients with 50 GGNs were included in the IG group. There were no significant disparities in the baseline data between the two groups of patients. According to our investigation, the technical success rates of CT-based hook-wire- and IG-based localization procedures were 97.4% and 100%, respectively (P = 1.000). Moreover, the significantly longer localization duration (15.3 ± 6.3 min vs. 11.2 ± 5.3 min, P = 0.002) and higher visual analog scale (4.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.001) were observed in the hook-wire patients, than in the IG patients. Occurrence of pneumothorax was significantly higher in hook-wire patients (27.3% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.048). Lung hemorrhage seemed higher in hook-wire patients (28.9% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.057) but did not reach statistical significance. Lastly, the technical success rates of VATS sublobar resection were 97.4% and 100% in hook-wire and IG patients, respectively (P = 1.000).ConclusionsBoth hook-wire- and IG-based localization methods can effectively identified GGNs before VATS resection. Furthermore, IG-based localization resulted in fewer complications, lower pain scores, and a shorter duration of localization.

Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of the four-hook needle and hook wire for the preoperative positioning of localization ground glass nodules

BackgroundWith the implementation of lung cancer screening programs, an increasing number of pulmonary nodules have been detected.Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) could provide adequate tissue specimens for pathological analysis, and has few postoperative complications.However, locating the nodules intraoperatively by palpation can be difficult for thoracic surgeons. The preoperative pulmonary nodule localization technique is a very effective method.We compared the safety and effectiveness of two methods for the preoperative localization of pulmonary ground glass nodules.MethodsFrom October 2020 to April 2021, 133 patients who underwent CT-guided single pulmonary nodule localization were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) after successful localization. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the localization accuracy, safety, information related to surgery and postoperative pathology information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of the two localization needles.ResultsThe mean maximal transverse nodule diameters in the four-hook needle and hook wire groups were 8.97 ± 3.85 mm and 9.00 ± 3.19 mm, respectively (P = 0.967). The localization times in the four-hook needle and hook wire groups were 20.58 ± 2.65 min and 21.43 ± 3.06 min, respectively (P = 0.09). The dislodgement rate was significantly higher in the hook wire group than in the four-hook needle group (7.46% vs. 0, P = 0.024). The mean patient pain scores based on the visual analog scale in the four-hook needle and hook wire groups were 2.87 ± 0.67 and 6.10 ± 2.39, respectively (P = 0.000). All ground glass nodules (GGNs) were successfully resected by VATS.ConclusionsPreoperative pulmonary nodule localization with both a four-hook needle and hook wire is safe, convenient and effective.

Feasibility and safety of computed tomography-guided intrapulmonary injection of indocyanine green for localization of peripheral pulmonary ground-glass nodules.

The early surgical intervention for pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) has become increasingly important, but accurate identification of these nodules during thoracoscopic surgery poses challenges due to the need for sublobar resections and reliance on visual and tactile perception alone. The prognosis of the procedure is closely tied to the use of precise positioning technology. Thus, it is crucial to develop an accurate positioning technology that can improve patient prognosis. Clinical data from the cardiothoracic department of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai were collected and analyzed between January 2020 and December 2021. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: an indocyanine green (ICG) group and a hook-wire group. Outcome measures including success rate, complications, procedure time, localization-related pain, and interval time were assessed. Adverse events and reactions were reported and compared between the 2 groups. A total of 62 patients (17 males and 45 females, aged 50.5±13.2 years) were in the ICG group, while 66 patients (23 males and 43 females, aged 48.4±12.9 years) were localized in the hook-wire group. The success rate was comparable between the 2 groups. However, the ICG group showed significant advantages over the hook-wire group in terms of procedure time (22.6±4.4 vs. 24.1±4.9 min; P=0.012), localization-related pain (P<0.001), and interval time [median and interquartile range (IQR): 3 (0.7, 104.9) vs. 1.2 (0.5, 3.3) h; P<0.001]. In the ICG group, there were 11 cases of pneumothorax, 4 cases of hemothorax, and 2 cases of ICG diffusion. In the hook-wire group, there were 24 cases of pneumothorax, 25 cases of hemothorax, and 2 cases of dislodgement. The ICG group had fewer complications, including pneumothorax (P=0.018) and hemothorax (P=0.007), compared to the hook-wire group. Computed tomography (CT)-guided intrapulmonary injection of ICG for preoperative localization of peripheral pulmonary GGNs is a practical and safe technique. It offers advantages in terms of reduced procedure time, localization-related pain, and interval time compared to the hook-wire method. Moreover, the ICG technique results in fewer complications, making it a valuable preoperative localization technique worthy of popularization.

Computed tomography-guided hookwire localization and medical glue combined with methylene blue localization for pulmonary nodules before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-center, retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided hookwire localization and new CT-guided medical glue combined with methylene blue (MGMB) localization before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and to analyze the risk factors for complications after localization. A total of 620 patients, comprising 727 SPNs, admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between December 2019 and July 2022 were retrospectively studied and case-control analyzed. According to the localization method, 620 patients were divided into the hookwire group (n=310) and MGMB group (n=310). The localization time, localization-to-surgery interval, operative time, length of hospitalization, and complication rate were compared between the 2 groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for the occurrence of complications in each group of localization methods. Compared to the hookwire group, the MGMB group had a shorter localization time (8.59±3.69 vs. 7.35±2.99 min; P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (5.60±2.13 vs. 6.73±2.86 days; P<0.001), and shorter operative time (103.48±54.11 vs. 98.59±49.92 min; P=0.33). The preoperative localization success rate was 99.4% (355/357) and 100% (370/370) in the hookwire group and MGMB group, respectively. No death or serious complications occurred during the localization process, but the overall complication rate was lower in the MGMB group (69/310, 22.3%) than in the hookwire group (105/310, 33.9%) (P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, number of nodules, and localization time were risk factors for total complications, while localization technique was a protective factor for total complications [odds ratio =0.590; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.405-0.860; P<0.05]. Both techniques could effectively locate SPNs before VATS; however, MGMB localization was found to be associated with a lower complication rate, shorter localization time, better safety, and higher potential clinical value and is thus worthy of clinical promotion.

Randomized comparison of the four-hook anchor device and hook-wire use for the preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) with 4-hook anchor device and hook-wire before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. MethodsPatients with SPNs scheduled for computed tomography–guided nodule localization before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between May 2021 and June 2021 at our center were randomized to either 4-hook anchor group or hook-wire group. The primary end point was intraoperative localization success. ResultsAfter randomization, 28 patients with 34 SPNs were assigned to the 4-hook anchor group and 28 patients with 34 SPNs to the hook-wire group. The operative localization success rate was significantly greater in the 4-hook anchor group than in the hook-wire group (94.1% [32/34] vs 64.7% [22/34]; P = .007). All lesions in the 2 groups were successfully resected under thoracoscopy, but 4 patients in the hook-wire group who required transition from wedge resection to segmentectomy or lobectomy because of unsuccessful localization. Total localization-related complication rate was significantly lower in the 4-hook anchor group than in the hook-wire group (10.3% [3/28] vs 50.0% [14/28]; P = .004). The rate of chest pain requiring analgesia after the localization procedure was significantly lower in the 4-hook anchor group than in the hook-wire group (0 vs 5/28, 17.9%; P = .026). There were no significant differences in localization technical success rate, operative blood loss, hospital stay length and hospital cost between the 2 groups (all P > .05). ConclusionsThe use of the 4-hook anchor device for SPN localization offers advantages over the traditional hook-wire technique.

Comparison of three-dimensional reconstruction and CT-guided Hook-wire segmental resection for pulmonary nodules: a propensity score matching study

ObjectiveTo analyze and compare the clinical application value of three-dimensional reconstruction and computed tomography (CT)-guided Hook-wire localization for row lung segment resection of pulmonary nodules.MethodsRetrospective analysis of the clinical data of 204 patients suffering from pulmonary nodules admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital from June 2016 to December 2022. According to the preoperative positioning method, the group was divided into a 3D reconstruction group (98 cases) and a Hook-wire group (106 cases), respectively. The two groups of patients were propensity score matching (PSM) to compare their perioperative outcomes.ResultsAll patients in both groups underwent successful surgeries without perioperative deaths. After PSM, 79 patients were successfully matched in each group. Two cases of pneumothorax, three cases of hemothorax, and four cases of decoupling occurred in the Hook-wire group; no complications of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and decoupling occurred in the 3D reconstruction group. Compared to the Hook-wire group, the 3D reconstruction group has shorter operative time (P = 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), less total postoperative chest drainage (P = 0.003), shorter postoperative tube placement time (P = 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.026), and postoperative complications (P = 0.035). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pathological type, TNM staging, and number of lymph node dissection.ConclusionThree-dimensional reconstruction and localization of pulmonary nodules enables safe and effective individualized thoracoscopic anatomical lung segment resection with a low complication rate, which has good clinical application value.

Comparison between preoperative hook-wire and liquid material localization for pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

Computed tomography (CT)-guided liquid material (LM) and hook-wire (HW) are usually localized for pulmonary nodules (PNs) before video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection, but the relative advantages of these 2 techniques remain uncertain. This meta-analysis was conceived to juxtapose the efficacy and safety of HW localization (HWL) and LM localization (LML), both guided by CT, for the preoperative localization of PNs. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify relevant studies published as of March 2023, after which pooled analyses of study outcomes were conducted. A total of 7 studies were included in this meta-analysis from 142 relevant studies. These 7 studies included 551 patients (583 PNs) with CT-guided HWL and 551 patients (612 PNs) with LML. The successful localization rate was significantly higher in the LM group (LMG) than in the HW group (HWG) (p = 0.002). The LMG also exhibited significantly lower pooled total complication and lung haemorrhage rates than the HWG (p = 0.007 and 0.00001, respectively). Pooled localization duration, pneumothorax rates, and VATS procedure duration were comparable in both groups (p = 0.45, 0.15, and 0.74, respectively). Furthermore, the pooled postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LMG than in the HWG (p = 0.009). Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of localization duration and pneumothorax rate (I2 = 93% and 66%, respectively). CT-guided LML is safer and more successful than HWL for patients with PNs before VATS resection.

Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for pulmonary nodules: comparison between hook-wire and anchored needle localization.

Both hook-wire (HW) and anchored needle (AN) techniques can be used for preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization for pulmonary nodules (PNs). But the outcomes associated with these two materials remain unclear. To assess the relative safety and efficacy of preoperative CT-guided HW and AN localization for PNs. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from two institutions. Consecutive patients with PNs between January 2020 and December 2021 who underwent preoperative CT-guided HW or AN localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures were included in these analyses, which compared the safety and clinical efficiency of these two localization strategies. In total, 98 patients (105 PNs) and 93 patients (107 PNs) underwent CT-guided HW and AN localization procedures, respectively. The HW and AN groups exhibited similar rates of successful PN localization (95.2% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.117), but the dislodgement rate in the HW group was significantly higher than that for the AN group (4.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.029). The mean pain score of patients in the HW group was significantly higher than that for the AN group (p = 0.001). HW and AN localization strategies were associated with comparable pneumothorax (21.4% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.349) and pulmonary hemorrhage (29.6% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.354) rates. All patients other than 1 individual in the HW group successfully underwent VATS-guided limited resection. These data suggest that AN represents a safe, well-tolerated, feasible preoperative localization strategy for PNs that may offer value as a replacement for HW localization.

Comparison of hook-wire and medical glue for CT-guided preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules.

BackgroundPreoperative localization is challenging due to the small diameter of pulmonary nodules or their deep location in the lung parenchyma during VATS surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both hook-wire and medical glue for pre-operative localization of pulmonary nodules.MethodsIn the current study, 158 patients were retrospectively analyzed (January 2019 and January 2020). The patients underwent hook-wire or medical glue for pre-operative localization of pulmonary nodules. Among them, 74 patients in the hook-wire group and 84 patients in the medical glue group underwent VATS anatomic segmentectomy or wedge resection after localization of pulmonary nodules. Pre-operative localization data from all patients were compiled. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of the two methods were evaluated according to localization success rates and localization-related complications.ResultsThe success rate of localization in the medical glue group was 100% while 97.3% in the hook-wire group. After localization of the pulmonary nodules, the incidence of minor pneumothorax in the medical glue group (11.9%) was lower than that in the hook-wire group (37.8%) (p=0.01). The incidence of mild pulmonary parenchymal hemorrhage in the medical glue group (13.1%) was also lower than that in the hook-wire group (24.3%) (p=0.000). The mean time from the completion of localization to the start of surgery was also longer in the medical glue group than in the hook-wire group (p=0.000). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores after localization were higher in the hook-wire group than in the medical glue group (p=0.02). In both groups, parenchymal hemorrhage was significantly associated with the needle length in hook-wire localization and the depth of the medical glue in the lung parenchyma (p = 0.009 and 0.001, respectively).ConclusionThese two localization methods are safe and effective in pre-operative pulmonary nodule localization. The medical glue localization method had a lower risk of complications, a higher localization success rate, less pain after localization and more flexibility in the arrangement of operation time.

The improved success rate and reduced complications of a novel localization device vs. hookwire for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules: a single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

BackgroundIn our previous study, we developed a 4-hook claw-suture localization device for pulmonary nodule resection, which acheived satifisfactory results. Following this, we conducted this single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial to compare the success rate and complication rate of this novel localization device and currently widely-used hookwire.MethodsPatients with small pulmonary nodules (0.4–1 cm) who received preoperative localization and thoracoscopic resection at Shanghai Chest Hospital were randomly assigned (1:2 ratio, via computer-generated randomized numbers) to undergo localization using either a novel claw-suture system (claw group) or classical (hookwire group) localization device. The primary endpoint of this study was localization success rate, and the secondary endpoints included complications, localization-related time, and pain.ResultsA total of 411 patients were randomly assigned to the claw group (n=136) or the hookwire group (n=275) before thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules and analyzed. Compared with the hookwire group, the claw group had a significantly higher success rate (133/136, 97.8% vs. 254/275, 92.4%, P=0.027), less asymptomatic hemorrhage (16.9% vs. 37.5%, P=0.003) and pleural reaction (0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.017), as well as better pain alleviation 10 min after localization (measured using the difference between two visual analog scale scores, 0.84±0.98 vs. 0.35±0.79, P<0.001). In contrast, the hookwire group was associated with a shorter localization procedure duration than the claw group (7.2±2.9 vs. 14.4±6.6 min, P<0.001). In the multiple localization subgroup, the claw group compared to the hookwire group also achieved higher success (32/33, 97.0% vs. 70/86, 81.4%) and less pleural reaction (0% vs. 16.3%).ConclusionsThe new claw-suture localization device is superior to traditional hookwire, with a higher success rate, fewer complications, and better patient tolerance for preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027346.

Preoperative lung nodule localization: comparison of hook-wire and indocyanine green.

Computed tomography (CT)-guided localization approaches are commonly used to guide video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-based lung nodule (LN) resection. To compare the relative safety and efficacy of CT-guided hook-wire (HW) and indocyanine green (IG) approaches to preoperative LN localization. In total, this study analyzed data from 41 patients who underwent CT-guided HW localization prior to VATS-based LN resection between December 2017 and December 2020, as well as 53 patients who underwent CT-guided IG localization prior to VATS-based LN resection between January 2021 and September 2021. Both clinical efficacy and complication rates were compared in these two groups. Overall, 41 patients underwent HW localization for 42 LNs, while 53 patients underwent IG localization for 55 LNs in the respective groups. The respective rates of successful localization in the HW and IG groups were 97.6% and 100% (p = 1.000). The average duration of CT-guided localization was significantly shorter for patients in the IG group relative to the HW group (p = 0.003). The total complication rate was significantly higher in the HW group than that in the IG group (p = 0.004). Prolonged localization duration was an independent risk factor of pneumothorax (p = 0.004). Rates of technical success for the wedge resection procedure (p = 1.000), VATS duration (p = 0.623), and blood loss (p = 0.800) were comparable in both patient groups. HW and IG localization procedures achieved similar efficacy outcomes when used to preoperatively localize LNs. However, IG localization may exhibit better safety than HW localization.

Targeted Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Iodized Indocyanine Green in Preoperative Pulmonary Localization: Comparative Efficacy, Safety, Patient Perception With Hook-Wire Localization

BackgroundPrecise preoperative localization is of great importance to improve the success rate and reduce the operation time of VATS surgery. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, patient perception between CT-guided indocyanine green (ICG) preoperative localization of lung nodule and hook-wire localization.Methods65 patients with 85 clinically suspicious pulmonary nodules underwent ICG preoperative localization in this study, and 92 patients with 95 nodules localized by conventional hook-wire served as controls. Both hook-wire localization and ICG injection were performed under CT guidance. Successful targeting rate, success rate in the operative field, incidence rate of complications and respiratory pain score were recorded and compared.ResultsThe successful targeting rate for both groups is 100%, however, due to hook-wire dislodgement, the success rate in the VATS operation field of the hook-wire group (95.6%) is lower than that of the ICG group (100%), with no significant difference(p=0.056). The overall complication rate of the hook-wire group (37.0%) is significantly higher than the ICG group (35.4%) (p=0.038). The mean respiratory pain score of the hook-wire group is 3.70 ± 1.25, which is significantly higher than that of the ICG group (2.85 ± 1.05) (p<0.001).ConclusionsICG composed with contrast mixture are superior to the conventional hook-wire preoperative lung nodule localization procedure, with a lower complication rate, lower pain score, and relatively higher success rate. ICG is a promising alternative method for pulmonary nodule preoperative localization.

Influence of preoperative breast cancer localization techniques on rates of sentinel lymph node visualization with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy.

The use of preoperative image-guided lesion localization for impalpable breast cancer may interfere with lymphatic drainage and cause delayed or reduced visualization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. The goal of this audit was to compare rates of SLN visualization in patients undergoing preoperative breast cancer localization with either Iodine 125 seeds (radio-guided occult lesion localization using Iodine 125 seeds, ROLLIS) or hook wire and those with palpable lesions where no localization was required. We reviewed the records of 482 patients, who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with hook wire, ROLLIS, or no localization, at three major tertiary hospitals from January 2013 to December 2017. Static lymphoscintigraphy images are performed post administration of subcutaneous periareolar Tc antimony colloid injection. The rate of SLN visualization in the three groups and time to node visualization were analyzed. Four hundred and eighty-two patients underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy: 102 after no localization, 211 in hook wire, and 169 following ROLLIS. Very high overall rates of SLN visualization on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were noted in all three groups; no localization group: 99% [95% confidence interval (CI), 94.7-99.8%], hook wire: 98.6% (95% CI, 95.9-99.7%) and ROLLIS: 98.8% (95% CI, 95.8-99.9%). For time to node visualization, a statistically significant difference was found between the no localization versus hook-wire group (P = 0.0015) and no localization versus ROLLIS group (P = 0.00011) but no statistically significant difference between the hook-wire and ROLLIS groups (P = 0.16) was demonstrated. High rates of SLN visualization on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were noted in all groups, with no significant reduction when breast lesion localization techniques were used. There was; however, an increased rate of delayed imaging required for SLN visualization in women who had undergone either type of preoperative localization compared with those who had not.

Hook-wire localization versus lipiodol localization for patients with pulmonary lesions having ground-glass opacity

ObjectivesAccurate and safe preoperative localization is useful for video-assisted thoracic surgery of small pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity (GGO). However, the optimal localization method is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness and safety of the lipiodol and hook-wire localization techniques for video-assisted thoracic surgery of GGO lesions. MethodsThis prospective, non-randomized comparative study was conducted between April 2014 and December 2016 at 8 qualifying university teaching hospitals. Two-hundred-fifty patients with pulmonary lesions having GGO were included. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the lipiodol (n = 125, 4 hospitals) or hook-wire group (n = 125, 4 hospitals) for preoperative localization procedures. Participants underwent preoperative localization via the lipiodol or hook-wire technique followed by thoracoscopic surgery. The primary endpoint was the procedure success rate. ResultsThe procedure success rates (hook-wire vs lipiodol group) were 94.40% versus 99.16% (P = .08). Localization-related complications occurred in 53.60% versus 48.33% of patients (P = .49). Hemorrhage rates were significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (21.6% vs 5.83%, P < .001). The lipiodol procedure time was significantly longer than that of the hook-wire technique (20.69 ± 9.34 vs 17.15 ± 7.91 minutes, P = .001). The initially positive surgical resection margin was significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (10.89% vs 2.38%, P = .02). ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in success rate between the hook-wire and lipiodol methods. However, the hemorrhage rate was significantly greater in the hook-wire group, whereas the hook-wire group showed greater initially positive surgical resection margins.

CT Fluoroscopic-Guided Coil Localization of Lung Nodules prior to Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgical Resection Reduces Complications Compared to Hook Wire Localization

PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of hook wire versus microcoil localization of pulmonary nodules prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic resection (VATS). Materials and MethodsA retrospective comparative review was conducted of 46 patients (26 hook wire and 20 microcoil) who underwent computed tomography fluoroscopic-guided nodule localizations prior to VATS in a single center between January 2012 and August 2016. Nodule characteristics, procedural details, clinical outcomes, and pathologic findings were collected. Baseline characteristics and lung nodule distribution were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Nodule sizes ranged from 2 mm to 28 mm and were similar between groups. Twenty-nine patients (63%) were male, with mean (standard deviation) age of 61 (11) years. Adverse events were classified using standard criteria. Patients were followed for up to 90 days, and the clinical outcomes were compared. ResultsSuccessful resection of nodules was achieved in all patients. Twelve cases of displacement of the hook wire were observed compared to only 1 in the coil group (P < .01). The total complication rate was lower in the coil group (25% vs 54%, P = .04). Two patients required transition to thoracotomy in the hook wire group, compared to none in the coil group. Median blood loss was similar in both groups (median loss, 20–22 mL). One patient had positive margins in the hook wire group. There was a nonsignificant trend toward longer hospital stay and higher major complication rates after hook wire localization (P = .4). ConclusionsPulmonary nodule localization with coils prior to VATS resection demonstrated fewer displacements and fewer perioperative complications compared to hook wires.

A Comparison between Prethoracoscopy Localization of Small Pulmonary Nodules by Means of Medical Adhesive versus Hookwire

PurposeTo compare prethoracoscopy localization of small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) by means of medical adhesive versus hookwire. Materials and MethodsOne hundred seven patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery resection for SPNs were consecutively recruited in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the material used for localization of the SPNs: the medical adhesive group (n = 88) and the hookwire group (n = 19). The baseline data were collected, and operation waiting time (OWT; the time gap between localization and surgery), wedge resection performing time (WRPT), pathologic result, and complications of the 2 groups were assessed. ResultsAll SPNs were successfully marked. No differences in pathologic result (P = .676), wedge resection, or segmentectomy rate (P = .679) were observed. OWT was markedly longer in the medical adhesive group than in the hookwire group (P < .001), whereas WRPT was similar in the 2 groups (P = .926). There were significantly (P = .004) fewer complications in the medical adhesive group (37.42%) than in the hookwire group (15.79%). Regarding individual complications, hemorrhage occurred significantly less in the medical adhesive group than in the hookwire group (9% vs 68%; P < .001), and no differences of cough, pneumothorax, or chest pain were found between the 2 groups (all P > .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis further validated that hookwire was independently correlated with a higher risk of complication occurrence (P = .008) and hemorrhage occurrence (P < .001) compared with medical adhesive. ConclusionsCompared with hookwire, localization via medical adhesive can achieve a flexible time gap between localization and surgery. It also decreases the complication rate and increases convenience owing to no need for an anchor hook.

Lipiodol lOcalization for Ground-glass opacity mInimal Surgery: Rationale and design of the LOGIS trial

ObjectivesThe diagnosis and treatment of ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions have become important issues because subsolid nodules including GGO are known to frequently represent the histologic spectrum of lung adenocarcinoma. Because small GGO lesions cannot usually be palpated or visualized during surgery, several marking techniques have been reported for localization during thoracoscopic surgery, such as lipiodol and hook-wire localization. This study is designed to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of the lipiodol localization technique for individuals undergoing GGO VATS resection compared to the hook-wire localization technique. MethodsTwo hundred fifty participants will be prospectively enrolled in a 1:1 manner to the lipiodol or hook-wire group according to the inclusion criteria. All study participants will undergo preoperative lung localization using either the lipiodol or hook-wire method. Thoracoscopic surgery will be performed by experienced thoracoscopic surgeons within several hours after marking under general anesthesia. The primary endpoint is the procedure success rate, and the secondary endpoints are the procedure complication rate, procedure time, surgery time and the margin from the lesion in the resected specimen. ResultsPatient enrollment will be completed within 2years. We will analyze the procedure success rate and the presence of complications with regard to the CT results. In addition, the procedure and surgery times, and the safety margin will be also compared between the 2 techniques. ConclusionIf the aims of this study are achieved, then the use of lipiodol localization technique will be widespread in the localization of non-palpable pulmonary lesions that are indicated for surgical resection. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02180568)