Homologous Recombination Repair Genes Research Articles

PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer: clinical applications.

Despite recent advancements in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), this disease remains lethal. A novel family of targeted pharmaceuticals known as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has been developed to treat mCRPC patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. The FDA recently approved olaparib and rucaparib for treating mCRPC patients with HRR gene alterations. Ongoing trials are investigating combination therapies involving PARP inhibitors combined with radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to improve the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors and broaden the range of patients who can benefit from the treatment. This review provides an overview of the development of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer and analyzes the mechanisms underlying their resistance.

PARP Inhibitors in Pancreatic Cancer with Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations: A Single-Institution Experience.

Limited data are available regarding the anticancer activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in pancreatic cancer with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA and PALB2. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 48 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline and/or somatic HRR mutations who were treated with PARPis. Thirty patients had germline (g)HRR mutations only, twelve had somatic (s)HRR mutations only, and six had concomitant gHRR and sHRR mutations. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Five patients received olaparib in the front-line setting due to borderline performance status. Their ORR was 20%, and their mPFS and mOS were both 11.3 months. The ORR was higher in patients with BRCA or PALB2 mutations (germline or somatic) than in those with non-BRCA/PALB2 mutations. Patients with somatic non-BRCA/PALB2 variants had a shorter mPFS. Patients with concomitant gHRR/sHRR mutations or gHRR mutations alone had a significantly longer mPFS than those with sHRR mutations only. PARP inhibitors may be considered for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA who cannot tolerate standard chemotherapy. Maintenance PARPis can be considered in selected patients with non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations.

Prevalence and outcomes of germline pathogenic variants of homologous recombination repair genes in ovarian cancer.

Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) are pivotal in gynecological oncology. We focused on the prevalence, clinicopathological features, and survival impact of homologous recombination repair (HRR) PVs in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study, and 1248 patients with EOC were registered. Eligible patients (n = 1112) underwent germline DNA analysis for 26 cancer predisposition genes, including nine HRR-related genes, such as BRCA1/2, BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51C/D, and ATM. The associations between clinicopathological factors and HRR-related PVs were examined. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Among 1091 analyzed patients, 153 (14.0%) carried PVs and 140 (12.8%) were HRR-related. HRR-PV-positive status significantly correlated with serous carcinoma (22.9% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.0001) and advanced disease (18.5% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.0001). The HRR-PV-positive group exhibited higher prevalence of personal breast (12.9%) and familial breast/ovarian (29.2%) cancer history. HRR status independently improved overall survival in stage III/IV disease (P = 0.04) but not progression-free survival. HRR-related germline PVs exhibit distinct clinicopathological features with survival implications. Variants were significantly associated with serous carcinoma and advanced disease, underscoring the importance of genetic testing to develop individualized EOC treatment strategies. Considering the study period (2000-2019), the limited use of bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as maintenance therapy should be recognized.

Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide in Patients With HRR-Deficient mCRPC: Practical Implementation Steps for Oncology Nurses and Advanced Practice Providers.

About one-quarter of patients with advanced prostate cancer have alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. In a global phase 3 study, talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This article reviews the role of oncology nurses and advanced practice providers (APPs) in administering talazoparib plus enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC. This review and hypothetical case study illustrate the role of oncology nurses and APPs in the administration of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and the management of adverse events to ensure safe and effective use in clinical practice. Oncology nurses and APPs play an important role in the dosing and administration of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and can recognize and manage adverse events in patients with HRR-deficient mCRPC.

Abstract C006: LODESTAR: A Single Arm Phase II Study of Rucaparib in Solid Tumors with Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variants in Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) Genes

Abstract Purpose: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have proven clinical utility in platinum-sensitive breast, ovary, pancreas, and prostate cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). We explored whether PARPi might be efficacious in other solid tumors and for a broader range of genomic variants. Patients and Methods: This single-arm phase II study assessed rucaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced, platinum-sensitive or -resistant solid tumors and pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D (Cohort A) or BARD1, BRIP1, FANCA, NBN, RAD51B (Cohort B). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in cohort A. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety[SS3] [SA4] in the entire study population. Available tumors were analyzed for pre-specified exploratory objective of allele specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH). [SA7] HRD signature (HRDsig) and platinum sensitivity status were explored as biomarkers for rucaparib activity in post hoc exploratory analyses. The study was terminated early by the sponsor due to feasibility concerns. Results: Eighty-three patients were enrolled (Cohort A: 63; Cohort B: 20). Fifty-seven patients in Cohort A and 16 in Cohort B were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The[LM8] [SA9] ORR of cohort A was 16% (95% CI 9-27%) and DCR was 61% (95% CI 48-73%). LOH and HRDsig were available for 48% of Cohort A and 71% of Cohort B. Of 11 patients who had a response to treatment, 6 tumors were HRDsig+, 1 HRDsig-and 4 were unknown. The ORR and DCR were significantly greater in patients with HRDsig+ vs HRDsig-tumors (ORR: HRDsig+ 32% [95% CI 15-54%] vs HRDsig-3% [95% CI 0-15%], p &amp;lt; 0.01; DCR: HRDsig+ 74% [95% CI 51-88%] vs HRDsig-38% [95% CI 24-55%], p = 0.02). mPFS was numerically longer for HRDsig+ vs HRDsig-: 7.0 mos (95% CI, 4.3 – inf), vs. 3.0 mos (95% CI 2.3-5.6), HR 0.57, p = 0.14. mPFS was greater for platinum sensitive vs resistant tumors (7.82 mos [95% CI 5.5-inf] vs. 2.9 mos [95% CI 1.8-inf], HR 0.28, p = 0.02); Neither tumor tissue of origin nor specific mutation was independently predictive of outcome. The HR for progression in tumors that were both HRDsig+ and platinum sensitive versus those that were HRDsig-and platinum resistant was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01-0.55, p = 0.047). The Rucaparib safety profile was consistent with prior studies. Conclusion: Rucaparib has activity across solid tumors with PVs in HRR genes, regardless of tissue of origin. Patients with platinum resistant or HRDsig-tumors had limited clinical benefit from rucaparib. The combined use of HRDsig and platinum sensitivity to predict sensitivity to PARPi is encouraging as a biomarker strategy and warrants prospective study. Citation Format: Sriram Anbil, Nicholas J Seewald, Kevin Lin, Marcia Craib, Christy Connor, Heidi Giordano, Karen McLachlan, Tanya Kwan, Lara Maloney, Hanna Tukachinsky, Alexa Schrock, Shuoguo Wang, Ethan Sokol, Brennan Decker, Katherine Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Kim Reiss. LODESTAR: A Single Arm Phase II Study of Rucaparib in Solid Tumors with Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variants in Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) Genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C006.

A panel-based mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency associates with response to PARP inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib is approved for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is significant heterogeneity in response to PARPi in patients with mCRPC. Better clinical biomarkers are needed to identify patients likely to benefit from PARPi. Patients with prostate adenocarcinoma and panel sequencing at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were identified. Mutational signature analysis was performed using SigMA to characterize tumors as HRR deficient (HRD). The validity of SigMA to identify patients likely to benefit from olaparib was compared to the current FDA label (presence of a deleterious alteration in one of 14 HRR genes). 546 patients were identified, of which 34% were HRD. Among patients with HRR gene alterations, only patients with BRCA2 two-copy loss (2CL) were more likely to be HRD compared to patients without HRR gene alterations (74% vs 31%; P = 9.1 × 10-7). 28 patients with mCRPC received olaparib, of which 13 were HRD and 9 had BRCA2 2CL. SigMA improved upon the current FDA label for predicting PSA50 (sensitivity: 100% vs 90%; specificity: 83% vs 44%; PPV: 77% vs 47%; NPV: 100% vs 89%) and rPFS > 6 months (sensitivity: both 92%; specificity: 93% vs 53%; PPV: 92% vs 63%; NPV: 93% vs 89%). On multivariate analysis, incorporating prognostic clinical factors and HR gene alterations, SigMA-predicted HRD independently associated with improved PSA-PFS (HR = 0.086, p = 0.00082) and rPFS (HR = 0.078, p = 0.0070). SigMA-predicted HRD may better identify patients likely to benefit from olaparib as compared to the current FDA label. Larger studies are needed for further validation.

284P Clinical and molecular characteristics of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) patients with germline pathogenic variants in homologous recombination repair genes

284P Clinical and molecular characteristics of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) patients with germline pathogenic variants in homologous recombination repair genes

1656TiP The STAMPEDE2 niraparib-abiraterone acetate + prednisolone trial: A phase III, randomised, open-label trial in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) with a deleterious alteration in a homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

1656TiP The STAMPEDE2 niraparib-abiraterone acetate + prednisolone trial: A phase III, randomised, open-label trial in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) with a deleterious alteration in a homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

1199P Developing and systematically validating homologous recombination repair gene detection method based on next-generation sequencing

1199P Developing and systematically validating homologous recombination repair gene detection method based on next-generation sequencing

1626P Incidence of hematologic toxicities in the homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient population of the TALAPRO-2 trial and their potential association with germline vs somatic origin of HRR gene alterations

1626P Incidence of hematologic toxicities in the homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient population of the TALAPRO-2 trial and their potential association with germline vs somatic origin of HRR gene alterations

Assessing olaparib efficacy in U.S. Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer utilizing a time-indifferent g-rate method ideal for real-world analyses

We aimed to assess real-world efficacy of the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in US Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) by leveraging the national data repository and evaluate a novel approach to assess treatment efficacy in tumors considered rare or harboring rare mutations. Included Veterans had 1) mPC with somatic or germline alterations/mutations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), 2) received olaparib monotherapy as well as a novel hormonal therapy/androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (NHT/ARPI), and/or chemotherapy, and 3) estimable rates of tumor growth (g-rate) using PSA values obtained while receiving treatment. Previous work has shown an excellent inverse correlation of g-rate with survival. Using g-rate, we determined tumor doubling time (DT) and DT ratios (DT on olaparib/DT on prior medication). We postulated that a DT ratio≥ 1 was associated with benefit. We identified 139 Veterans, including 42 Black males with tumors harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes who received olaparib: BRCA2 (50), ATM (32), BRCA1 (10), other mutations (47). 62/139 (45%) of all and 21/42 (50%) of Black Veterans had DT ratios ≥1, including 31, 10, 2, and 19 with BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, and other mutations, respectively (p=0.006). Median survival with DT ratios ≥1 was superior, being 24.5 vs. 11.4 months for DT ratio <1 (p=0.01, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.85). Benefit from olaparib, defined as DT ratio ≥1, was not observed for germline status, starting PSA value, number of prior therapies, or immediate prior therapy. Compared to matched cohorts, tumors in the olaparib cohort had shorter DTs with enzalutamide in first line (367 vs. 884 days; p=0.0043). Using equations indifferent to timing of assessments ideal for real-world efficacy analyses, we showed DT ratio ≥1 representing slower tumor growth on olaparib relative to the prior therapy correlates with improved survival. Olaparib efficacy in Veterans with mPC harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes emulates clinical trial results. Black men had comparable results. Compared to matched cohorts, in first line, enzalutamide was less efficacious in tumors harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes. American Society of Clinical Oncology Conquer Cancer Foundation (ASCO CCF), the Blavatnik Family Foundation and the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF).

Untapped Potential of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: Lessons Learned From the Real-World Clinical Homologous Recombination Repair Mutation Testing.

Testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mutations is pivotal to assess individual risk, to proact preventive measures in healthy carriers and to tailor treatments for cancer patients. Increasing prominence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with remarkable impact on molecular-selected patient survival across diverse nosologies, ingrains testing for BRCA genes and beyond in clinical practice. Nevertheless, testing strategies remain a question of debate. While several pathogenic BRCA1/2 gene variants have been described as founder pathogenic mutations frequently found in patients from Russia, other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes have not been sufficiently explored. In this study, we present real-world data of routine HRR gene testing in Russia. We evaluated clinical and sequencing data from cancer patients who had germline/somatic next-generation sequencing (NGS) HRR gene testing in Russia (BRCA1/2/ATM/CHEK2, or 15 HRR genes). The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the frequency of BRCA1/2 and non-BRCA gene mutations in real-world unselected patients from Russia, and to determine whether testing beyond BRCA1/2 is feasible. Data of 2,032 patients were collected from February 2021 to February 2023. Most had breast (n = 715, 35.2%), ovarian (n = 259, 12.7%), pancreatic (n = 85, 4.2%), or prostate cancer (n = 58, 2.9%). We observed 586 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 372 deleterious variants (DVs) across 487 patients, with 17.6% HRR-mutation positivity. HRR testing identified 120 (11.8%) BRCA1/2-positive, and 172 (16.9%) HRR-positive patients. With 51 DVs identified in 242 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), testing for variant origin clarification was required in one case (0.4%). Most BRCA1/2 germline variants were DV (121 DVs, 26 VUS); in non-BRCA1/2 genes, VUS were ubiquitous (53 DVs, 132 VUS). In silico prediction identified additional 4.9% HRR and 1.2% BRCA1/2/ATM/CHEK2 mutation patients. Our study represents one of the first reports about the incidence of DV and VUS in HRR genes, including genes beyond BRCA1/2, identified in cancer patients from Russia, assessed by NGS. In silico predictions of the observed HRR gene variants suggest that non-BRCA gene testing is likely to result in higher frequency of patients who are candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy. Continuing sequencing efforts should clarify interpretation of frequently observed non-BRCA VUS.

DNA-Damaging Therapies in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Pathogenic Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes.

Outcomes data for DNA-damaging therapeutics for men with prostate cancer (PC) and non-BRCA1/2 homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations are limited. We evaluated outcomes by HRR alteration in men with PC treated with poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy. Retrospective data from the PROMISE consortium were used. Clinical outcomes differences were assessed between patients with BRCA1/2 mutations (cohort A) and those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction (cohort B: ATM, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL). Outcomes in patients with HRR mutations with direct BRCA complex interaction were also explored (cohort C: RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L2, BARD1, GEN1, PALB2, FANCA, and BRIP1). One hundred and forty-six patients received PARPi (cohort A: 94, cohort B: 45, cohort C: 7) and 104 received platinum chemotherapy (cohort A: 48, cohort B: 44, cohort C: 10). PSA50 response rate to PARPi was higher in cohort A (61%) than cohort B (5%), P < .001. Median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) with PARPi in cohort A was significantly longer than in cohort B: 15.9 versus 8.7 months, P = .005. PSA50 response rate to platinum therapy was higher in cohort A (62%) than in cohort B (32%), P = .024, although crPFS was not significantly different. PSA50 response rate to PARPi and platinum was 40% and 32%, respectively, in cohort C. In multivariable analysis, cohort A had significantly improved overall survival and crPFS compared with cohort B with PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy. Patients with BRCA1/2-mutated PC had significantly improved outcomes to PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy compared with those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction.

Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition gene

PurposeThe prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination repair (HRR) and Lynch syndrome (LS) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) is uncertain. MethodsAn observational study reporting the detection rate of germline PVs in HRR and LS genes in all OC cases tested in the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub between September 1996 and May 2024. Effect sizes are reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for unselected cases tested between April 2021 and May 2024 versus 50,703 controls from the Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing study. Results2934 women were tested for BRCA1/2 and 433 (14.8%) had a PV. In up to 1572 women tested for PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, detection rates were PALB2 = 0.8%, BRIP1 = 1.1%, RAD51C = 0.4% and RAD51D = 0.4%. In 940 unselected cases, BRIP1 (OR = 8.7, 95% CI 4.6-15.8) was the third most common OC predisposition gene followed by RAD51C (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 3.1-23.1), RAD51D (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 2.1-19.7), and PALB2 (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-10.3). No PVs in LS genes were detected in unselected cases. ConclusionPanel testing in OC resulted in a detection rate of 2% to 3% for germline PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, with the largest contributor being BRIP1. Screening for LS in unselected cases of OC is unnecessary.

Alterations in the expression of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in breast cancer tissues considering germline BRCA1/2 mutation status

IntroductionHomologous recombination (HR) is a crucial DNA-repair mechanism, and its disruption can lead to the accumulation of mutations that initiate and promote cancer formation. The key HR genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are particularly significant as their germline pathogenic variants are associated with a hereditary predisposition to breast and/or ovarian cancer.Materials and methodsThe study was performed on 45 FFPE breast cancer tissues obtained from 24 and 21 patients, with and without the germline BRCA1/2 mutation, respectively. The expression of 11 genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, FANCA, FANCB, FANCI, RAD50, RAD51D, BRIP1, and CHEK2 was assessed using Custom RT2 PCR Array (Qiagen), and results were analysed using R.ResultsCancer tissues from patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations displayed no significant differences in the expression of the selected HR genes compared to BRCA1 or BRCA2 wild-type cancer tissues. In BRCA1mut cancer tissues, BRCA1 expression was significantly higher than in BRCA2mut and BRCA wild-type cancer tissues.ConclusionsIn cancer tissues harbouring either BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations, no significant differences in expression were observed at the mRNA level of any tested HR genes, except BRCA1. However, the significant differences observed in BRCA1 expression between germline BRCA1mut, germline BRCA2mut and BRCA1/2wt tissues may indicate a compensatory mechanism at the mRNA level to mitigate the loss of BRCA1 function in the cells.

Somatic and germline aberrations in homologous recombination repair genes among Chinese high-risk breast cancer patients by multi-gene next-generation sequencing.

Recently, genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway have been extensively studied. However, the landscapes of HRR gene mutations remain poorly defined in Chinese high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients. Our study aims to identify the status of germline and somatic HRR gene mutations and their association with clinicopathological features in these patients. A total of 100 high-risk BC patients from our institution who underwent paired peripheral blood germline and BC tissues somatic 26 genes next-generation sequencing (NGS) from January 2018 to July 2023 were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Out of 100 high-risk BC patients, 55 (55%) had at least one germline or somatic mutation in HRR genes. Among them, 22% carried germline pathogenic variants (19 BRCA1/2 and 3 non-BRCA genes), 9% harbored somatic pathogenic mutations (3 BRCA1/2 and 6 non-BRCA genes). Among high-risk factors, family history and early onset BC showed a correlation with HRR gene mutations (p < 0.05). BRCA1 germline and HRR gene somatic mutations showed a correlation with TNBC, but BRCA2 germline mutations were associated with Luminal B/HER2-negative BC (p < 0.05). Patients with HRR gene somatic pathogenic variant more likely had a lympho-vascular invasion and distant metastasis (p < 0.05). The prevalence of HRR gene germline and somatic mutations were higher in Chinese BC patients with high risk factors. We strongly recommend that these high-risk BC patients receive comprehensive gene mutation testing, especially HRR genes, which are not only related to genetic consultation for BC patients and provide a theoretical basis for necessary prevention and individualized treatment.

Prevalence of homologous recombination biomarkers in multiple tumor types: an observational study.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in 13 genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), the prevalence of genomic loss of heterozygosity and the allelic and hereditary status of BRCA1, BRCA2 and other HRR gene mutations in multiple solid tumor types. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with an advanced/metastatic diagnosis in one of 15 solid tumor types, who were identified in a real-world clinico-genomic database. Results: Tumor tissue samples from 9457 patients were analyzed, among which 4.7% had known or suspected deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. The prevalence (range) of mutations in HRR genes was 13.6% (2.4%-26.0%) and genomic loss of heterozygosity ≥16% was 20.6% (2.6-34.4%) across all tumor types. Conclusion: The prevalence of mutations varied significantly depending on the type of tumor.

High-level tumour methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C is required for homologous recombination deficiency in solid cancers.

In ovarian and breast cancer, promoter methylation of BRCA1 or RAD51C is a promising biomarker for PARP inhibitor response, as high levels lead to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Yet the extent and role of such methylation in other cancers is not clear. This study comprehensively investigated promoter methylation of eight homologous recombination repair genes across 23 solid cancer types. Here, we showed that BRCA1 methylated cancers were associated with reduced gene expression, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), TP53 mutations and genomic features of HRD. We identified BRCA1 methylation in 3% of the copy-number high subtype of endometrial cancer, and as a rare event in six other cancer types, including lung squamous cell, pancreatic, bladder and stomach cancer. RAD51C promoter methylation was widespread across multiple cancer types, but HRD features were only observed for cases which contained high-level tumour methylation and LOH of RAD51C. While RAD51C methylation was frequent in stomach adenocarcinoma (6%) and low-grade glioma (2.5%), it was mostly detected at a low tumour level, suggestive of heterozygous methylation, and was associated with CpG island methylator phenotype. Our findings indicate that high-level tumour methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C should be explored as a PARP inhibitor biomarker across multiple cancers.

The pathologic and clinical outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in asymptomatic carriers of homologous recombination repair gene mutation.

To investigate the prevalence of pathological findings and clinical outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in asymptomatic carriers with germline homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV). This retrospective study enrolled asymptomatic carriers with germline HR gene PV/LPV who underwent RRSO between 2006 and 2022 at the National Cancer Center in Korea. Clinical characteristics, including history of breast cancer, family history of ovarian/breast cancer, parity, and oral contraceptive use, were analyzed. Of the 255 women who underwent RRSO, 129 (50.6%) had PV/LPV in BRCA1, 121 (47.5%) in BRCA2, and 2 (0.7%) had both BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV/LPV. In addition, 1 carried PV/LPV in RAD51D, and 2 in BRIP1. Among the BRCA1/2 PV/LPV carriers, occult neoplasms were identified in 3.5% of patients: serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (1.1%, n=3), fallopian tubal cancers (0.8%, n=2), ovarian cancer (1.2%, n=3), and breast cancer (0.4%, n=1). Of the 9 patients with occult neoplasms, 5 (2.0%) were identified from the 178 breast cancer patients, and 4 (1.6%) were detected in 65 healthy mutation carriers. During the median follow-up period of 36.7 months (interquartile range, 25.9-71.4), 1 (0.4%) BRCA1 PV carrier with no precursor lesions at RRSO developed primary peritoneal carcinomatosis after 30.1 months. Women with HRR gene mutations PV/LPV who undergo RRSO are at a risk of detecting occult neoplasms, with a of 3.5%. Even in the absence of precursor lesions during RRSO, there was a cumulative risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis development, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance.

Is the Homologous Recombination Repair Mutation Defined by a 15-Gene Panel Associated with the Prognosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer?

There is no consensus regarding the specific genes included in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene panel for identifying the HRR deficiency (HRD) status and predicting the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. We aimed to explore a 15-gene panel involving the HRR pathway as a predictive prognostic indicator in Chinese patients newly diagnosed with EOC. We reviewed the previously published reports about different HRR gene panels and prespecified the 15-gene panel. The genetic testing results in a 15-gene panel from 308 EOC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2022 from six centers were collected. The association of clinicopathologic characteristics, the use of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) and progression-free survival (PFS) with 15-gene panel HRR mutations (HRRm) status was assessed. 43.2% (133/308) of patients were determined to carry 144 deleterious HRRm, among which68.1% (98/144) were germline mutations and 32.8% (101/308) were BRCA1/2gene lethal mutations. The hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) for PFS (HRRmvHRR wild type, HRRwt) using the 15-gene panel HRRm was 0.42 (0.28-0.64) at all stages and 0.42 (0.27-0.65) at stages IIIC-IV. However, a prognostic difference was observed only between the BRCA mutation group and the HRRwt group, not between the non-BRCA HRRm group and the HRRwt group. For the subgroups of patients not using PARPis, the HR (95% CI) was 0.41 (0.24-0.68) at stages IIIC-IV. This study provides evidence that 15-gene panel HRRm can predict the prognosis of EOC, of these only the BRCA1/2 mutations, not non-BRCA HRRm, contribute to prognosis prediction. Among patients without PARPis, the HRRm group presented a better PFS. This is the first study of this kind in the Chinese population.