The family policy of the Bolsheviks finds itself in the focus of attention of researchers studying the project of creating a “new” Soviet man, the sphere of private life, gender relations and other subjects of the history of early Soviet society. The purpose of the article is to analyze the cultural and educational and propaganda mass work on the organization of leisure of family workers in the 1920s - the first half of the 1930s. The source basis of the research was made up of published and archival materials, which show the main directions of this work, problems, and achievements. To solve the tasks stated in the study, an appeal was made to a wide range of concrete historical methods. Among them historical-comparative, historical-typological, synchronistic, historical periodization and problem-chronological methods were involved. The provisions and methods of historical anthropology and cross-cultural studies were actively used in the study. The use of the methodology of the new social history made it possible to conduct a multifaceted analysis of the phenomenon of leisure (its connection with everyday life, leisure practices, gender and age characteristics, etc.), to explore leisure as a social institution and related power relations in the context of everyday practices of various historical actors. As a result, the authors concluded that the nature and content of leisure practices of family workers were determined by the prevailing “semi-open” family structure. The release of family leisure outside the home circle contributed to its politicization, the establishment of control over the private lives of people by the authorities. The range of leisure forms for family workers, as well as their popularity, directly depended on the enthusiasm and professionalism of the organizers, as well as the financial capabilities of the trade unions, which guaranteed the availability of props, furniture, inventory and suitable premises. The situation was complicated by the lack of a consistent and comprehensive family policy, which has not yet received a clear and uncontested direction. Family workers were offered a certain strategy aimed at spending their free time more intelligently and culturally, but it was difficult to implement in conditions of preserving financial and personnel problems, as well as the strength of traditional attitudes and values.
Read full abstract