Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Device Research Articles

Assessing Priorities in a Statewide Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative Based on the Results of a Needs Assessment: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

The Ohio Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative (Cardi-OH) unites general and subspecialty medical staff at the 7 medical schools in Ohio with community and public health partnerships to improve cardiovascular and diabetes health outcomes and eliminate disparities in Ohio's Medicaid population. Although statewide collaboratives exist to address health improvements, few deploy needs assessments to inform their work. Cardi-OH conducts an annual needs assessment to identify high-priority clinical topics, screening practices, policy changes for home monitoring devices and referrals, and preferences for the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based best practices. The results of the statewide needs assessment could also be used by others interested in disseminating best practices to primary care teams. A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture; Vanderbilt University) to both Cardi-OH grant-funded and non-grant-funded members (ie, people who have engaged with Cardi-OH but are not funded by the grant). In total, 88% (103/117) of Cardi-OH grant-funded members and 8.14% (98/1204) of non-grant-funded members completed the needs assessment survey. Of these, 51.5% (53/103) of Cardi-OH grant-funded members and 47% (46/98) of non-grant-funded members provided direct clinical care. The top cardiovascular medicine and diabetes clinical topics for Cardi-OH grant-funded members (clinical and nonclinical) were lifestyle prescriptions (50/103, 48.5%), atypical diabetes (38/103, 36.9%), COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease (CVD; 38/103, 36.9%), and mental health and CVD (38/103, 36.9%). For non-grant-funded members, the top topics were lifestyle prescriptions (53/98, 54%), mental health and CVD (39/98, 40%), alcohol and CVD (27/98, 28%), and cardiovascular complications (27/98, 28%). Regarding social determinants of health, Cardi-OH grant-funded members prioritized 3 topics: weight bias and stigma (44/103, 42.7%), family-focused interventions (40/103, 38.8%), and adverse childhood events (37/103, 35.9%). Non-grant-funded members' choices were family-focused interventions (51/98, 52%), implicit bias (43/98, 44%), and adverse childhood events (39/98, 40%). Assessment of other risk factors for CVD and diabetes across grant- and non-grant-funded members revealed screening for social determinants of health in approximately 50% of patients in each practice, whereas some frequency of depression and substance abuse screening occurred in 80% to 90% of the patients. Access to best practice home monitoring devices was challenging, with 30% (16/53) and 41% (19/46) of clinical grant-funded and non-grant-funded members reporting challenges in obtaining home blood pressure monitoring devices and 68% (36/53) and 43% (20/46) reporting challenges with continuous glucose monitors. Cardi-OH grant- and non-grant-funded members shared the following high-priority topics: lifestyle prescriptions, CVD and mental health, family-focused interventions, alcohol and CVD, and adverse childhood experiences. Identifying high-priority educational topics and preferred delivery modalities for evidence-based materials is essential for ensuring that the dissemination of resources is practical and useful for providers.

Trade-offs Between Accuracy and Health Outcomes in Algorithms for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices

Objectives Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is crucial for managing hypertension, but there is a potential trade-off between measurement accuracy and health/economic outcomes due to asymmetric costs associated with misclassifying an individual as having hypertension or not. We assessed whether adjustments to device readings that increased overall accuracy produced net health and economic benefits. Methods We analyzed data from N = 89 Alaska Native individuals who used 2 HBPM devices and a standard aneroid sphygmomanometer. We modeled changes in expected costs associated with individuals being misclassified as hypertensive or not under 3 different models of adjusting HBPM device readings. Results The gains in accuracy produced by adjusting HBPM readings decreased the overall rate of hypertension misclassification but increased the rate of false-negative readings. Adjusting readings led to a net increase in expected health and economic costs. Discussion Ignoring asymmetric costs of misclassification can escalate overall costs and worsen uncontrolled hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring algorithms must be cautiously designed, considering both false negatives and positives. Greater transparency in HBPM algorithms is needed for effective coordination among manufacturers, clinicians, and patients.

Abstract 15801: Nighttime Hypertension is a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Events in Stage B Heart Failure Patients

Background: Nighttime blood pressure (BP) was reported to have a stronger association with cardiovascular outcome and hypertensive organ damage than clinic BP, 24-hour BP, and daytime BP in hypertensives. However, the significance of nighttime BP was not established in stage B heart failure (HF) patients. We hypothesized that nighttime BP measured by home BP monitoring device was associated with cardiovascular outcome in stage B HF patients. Method: We used the dataset of Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study (J-HOP study), and selected 417 of stage B HF patients. The definition of stage B HF was based on Universal definition of HF. The patients with history of HF hospitalization were excluded. BP was measured on waking, before bedtime and during the night. The cardiovascular event was followed. Result: Mean follow-up period was 6.6±3.8 years, and 59 cardiovascular events were occurred. When nighttime hypertension was defined as nighttime BP >120mmHg, nighttime HT group showed higher BMI, serum creatinine, HbA1c, and higher prevalence of diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, and lower HDL-cholesterol than nighttime normotension (NT) group. With regard to BP, nighttime HT group, clinic BP, home morning BP, home evening BP, and home nighttime BP were higher in nighttime HT group than in nighttime NT group. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, nighttime HT group had a higher incident of cardiovascular event than nighttime NT group (P<0.01). In Cox multivariate analysis, nighttime HT was significant predictor for cardiovascular event adjusting by significant variables (Hazard ratio 1.84, 95% Confidence interval: 1.01-3.36, P=0.046). Conclusions: Nighttime HT was a prognostic factor in stage B HT patients. Nighttime BP was a therapeutic target to improve the outcome in stage B HT patients.

Nighttime home blood pressure lowering effect of esaxerenone in patients with uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension: the EARLY-NH study

There is limited evidence on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of esaxerenone on home BP, including nighttime BP. Using two newly developed nocturnal home BP monitoring devices (brachial and wrist), this multicenter, open-label, prospective study investigated the nighttime home BP-lowering effect of esaxerenone in patients with uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension being treated with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or calcium-channel blocker (CCB). In total, 101 patients were enrolled. During the 12-week study period, change in nighttime home systolic/diastolic BP from baseline to end of treatment measured by the brachial device was −12.9/−5.4 mmHg in the total population and −16.2/−6.6 and −10.0/−4.4 mmHg in the ARB and CCB subcohorts, respectively (all p < 0.001). For the wrist device, the change was −11.7/−5.4 mmHg in the total population and −14.6/−6.2 and −8.3/−4.5 mmHg in each subcohort, respectively (all p < 0.001). Similar significant reductions were shown for morning and bedtime home BP and office BP. Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and cardio-ankle vascular index improved in the total population and each subcohort. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related TEAEs were 38.6% and 16.8%, respectively; most were mild or moderate. The most frequent drug-related TEAEs were associated with serum potassium elevation (hyperkalemia, 9.9%; blood potassium increased, 3.0%); however, no new safety concerns were raised. Esaxerenone was effective in lowering nighttime home BP as well as morning and bedtime home BP and office BP, safe, and showed organ-protective effects in patients with uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension. Caution is warranted regarding elevated serum potassium levels.This study investigated the effect of esaxerenone on nighttime home BP and organ damage (UACR and NT-proBNP) in patients with uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension despite treatment with an ARB or CCB. Our results show that safe 24-h BP control and organ protection are possible with esaxerenone.

Awareness and recommendation of home blood pressure measurement among physicians in India: Results from Asia HBPM survey 2020

BackgroundAwareness of hypertension and blood pressure (BP) control rates are still low in India. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recognized as a valuable tool to diagnose and support hypertension treatment including the prevention of cardiovascular diseases(CVD) and target organ damage. We explored the prevailing knowledge and current recommendation of HBPM in daily practice by physicians in India. Materials and methodsAs part of Asia HBPM Survey 2020, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare providers from India between June 2020 to June 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions and sub-questions related to HBPM awareness and recommendations to patients. ResultsA total of 832 physicians participated in the survey. Almost 83% were male, whereas age, specialty and workplace were well distributed. 31.3% of physicians instruct their patients to measure their BP before taking antihypertensive drugs, while around 30% of physicians gave no instructions. The reference value of hypertension diagnosis amongst the physicians was substantially low based on clinic BP (34.4%) and home BP (15.1%). Among physicians who manage hypertensive patients, nearly 88% recommend HBPM to their patients, however, only 34.9% of their patients own HBPM device and 30.4% of the patients measure their own BP at home. ConclusionThe survey reveals that HBPM instructions to the patients are either lacking or not well aligned with the local hypertension guidelines which may have led to the low HBPM use among patients. Clear and practical educational material and sessions are needed to improve the understanding of HBPM amongst physicians.

Current realities of home blood pressure monitoring from physicians’ perspectives: results from Asia HBPM survey 2020

Uncontrolled hypertension is a significant problem in many parts of Asia. Effective management is essential to reduce the burden of hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a promising tool that can aid in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Experts from 11 countries/regions in Asia conceptualized a large-scale survey to examine the current realities of HBPM. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care professionals from China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam between November 2019 and June 2021. Physicians’ responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. A total of 7945 physicians participated in the survey. Among all respondents, 50.3% and 33.5% viewed HBPM as highly recognized by physicians and patients in their country/region, respectively. Lack of understanding of HBPM and concern with the accuracy and reliability of HBPM devices were identified as key barriers to HBPM recognition. Nearly all physicians (95.9%) reported recommending HBPM to their patients; however, they reported less than 50% of their patients measured home blood pressure (HBP). Among physicians who recommended HBPM, only 22.4% and 54.1% cited HBP diagnostic threshold values and timing of taking antihypertensive drugs that were consistent with available guidelines, respectively. The survey reveals that the recognition of HBPM as a valuable tool to diagnose and manage hypertension is suboptimal in most parts of Asia. Despite high recommendation of HBPM to hypertensive patients by physicians, there are considerable discrepancies between guidelines recommendations and practice realities.The recognition of HBPM as a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of hypertension is suboptimal among both physicians and patients in Asia. A clear and consistent guidance for proper HBPM practice and use of validated and calibrated HBP monitors are among the top priorities to support the integration of HBPM into daily patient care. HBPM: home blood pressure monitoring, HBP: home blood pressure.

Perspectives and Experiences of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure Among Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Self-monitoring of blood pressure is a key strategy in managing hypertension but may be challenging and burdensome for patients. The aim of the study was to describe the perspectives and experiences of self-monitoring of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched from database inception to March 2022. We used thematic synthesis to analyze the data. Thirty-five studies involving 872 patients aged 18-95 years were included. Four themes were identified: enabling autonomy and empowerment of own health (allowing access to comprehensive and accurate data, bolstering motivation for lifestyle changes, encouraging diligence in medication taking, gaining interest in self-management, and increasing awareness of health status); providing reassurance and convenience (instilling a sense of security, readiness for troubleshooting, and reducing the frequency of clinical appointments); triggering confusion and stress (anxiety and panic over "bad" numbers, constant reminder of illness identity, disregarded by clinicians, lack of confidence in interpreting and responding to results, redundancy of continuous monitoring, and uncertainties around targets and frequency of measures, concerns of unreliability); financial and operational burden of device (vulnerability preventing use, or unsustainable cost). Inadequate knowledge about the benefits of lowering blood pressure, home blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure goals, and interpretation of blood pressure values, limited access to home blood pressure monitoring devices, and psychological burden with home blood pressure monitoring limit home blood pressure monitoring.

Abstract 158: An Evaluation Of Stroke Survivors' Self-efficacy In Self-management Using A Stroke Telehealth Service

Background: Previous studies indicate that stroke survivors encounter difficulties in participating in self-management programs because of lack of transportation to rehabilitation centres and unsuitable scheduling. A virtual multidisciplinary stroke care clinic (VMSCC) that builds on the advantages of self-management programs to promote survivors’ recovery and improve caregivers’ outcomes was developed. Methods: A VMSCC was set up to facilitate the interactions between the participants and the healthcare professionals. Participants received a device kit containing a tablet and a clinically validated wireless home blood pressure monitoring device. It was encouraged that survivors monitor their blood pressure daily to take an active role in managing their health. Registered nurses conducted Skype-based video calls with stroke survivors on issues relating to stroke self-management. A nurse reviewed blood pressure data before video calls and used online tools to reinforce self-management knowledge and skills during the video calls. A hotline for psychological and non-urgent health concerns was also maintained by the nurse in the call centre. To determine its effectiveness on stroke survivors' self-efficacy in self-management, a two-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted. We measured self-efficacy outcome using the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire at baseline (shortly before discharge) and 3 and 6 months after study initiation. Results: We recruited 274 participants from 10 Hong Kong's public hospitals. At 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2), survivors in the control group demonstrated no significant difference in the change of self-efficacy with respect to T0 (baseline). The generalized estimating equations analysis showed a significant change and estimated additional improvement in self-efficacy in the intervention group at T2. Discussion: VMSCC's intervention was based on self-efficacy theory, which identified perceptions of personal capability as a significant variable associated with stroke outcomes. The development of a self-management program based on the self-efficacy theory was further supported by significant improvements in self-efficacy in the intervention group in this study.

Validation testing of five home blood pressure monitoring devices for the upper arm according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol

The accuracy of Omron 10 Series BP7450 (HEM-7342T-Z), Omron Platinum BP5450 (HEM-7343T-Z), Walmart Equate Premium 8000 Series UA-8000WM, Walgreens Premium 15+ WGNBPA-960BT, and CVS Series 800 BP3MW1-4YCVS were assessed in an adult general population compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer standard according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 validation procedure. Omron selected the monitors and included three non-Omron monitors because they were from large retail vendors in the United States and these monitors did not have accessible results from validation testing. The BP7450, N = 85, passed both criteria for the standard. Mean (SD) differences in paired SBP and DBP determinations between the test device and reference were 0.5 (7.7) and 2.5 (6.8) mm Hg. The BP5450, N = 86, passed both criteria. Mean (SD) differences in paired SBP and DBP determinations were 1.9 (7.0) and 3.6 (6.4) mm Hg. The UA-8000WM, N = 85, did not meet the first criterion for the standard. Mean (SD) differences in paired SBP and DBP determinations were 2.5 (8.0) and 5.1 (6.4) mm Hg. The WGNBPA-240BT, N = 85, did not meet the first criterion for the standard. Mean (SD) differences in paired SBP and DBP determinations were 7.9 (8.5) and 5.5 (6.7) mm Hg. The BP3MW1-4YCVS, N = 85, did not meet the first criterion for the standard. Mean (SD) differences in paired SBP and DBP determinations were 5.8 (8.7) and 3.1 (5.6) mm Hg. These findings emphasize the importance of verifying the validation status of home blood pressure monitors before use by consumers.

PS-BPC04-3: LOWER NOCTURNAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY IN HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION PATENTS

Objective: Blood pressure (BP) and its variability, especially nocturnal were associated with all-cause death and cardiovascular mortality in general population. However, little is known about the association between nocturnal BP variables (average value and variability) and cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Design and method: This study population consisted of 230 patients (mean age, 65 ± 13 years) who were admitted to our hospital due to HFrEF. Nocturnal BP was measured hourly using a home BP monitoring device, and its variability were expressed as the coefficient of variation of all readings. Results: During median follow-up period of 37 months, 19 (8%) patients had cardiovascular mortality. Compared with survivors, nocturnal systolic BP was significantly lower in cardiovascular mortality patients (125 ± 24 mmHg vs 110 ± 17 mmHg, p = 0.007). Univariate analysis showed that age, chronic kidney disease, nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP were associated with cardiovascular mortality. Cox proportional hazards models showed that nocturnal systolic BP was associated with cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for age and CKD (odds ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.94–0.99; P = 0.01), whereas nighttime diastolic BP and their variables (average value and variability) were not. Similarly, nocturnal systolic BP &lt; 108 mmHg was predictive of cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio: 3.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.53–9.67; P = 0.004), Conclusion: Lower nocturnal systolic BP was associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with HFrEF. Intervention for nocturnal systolic BP could avoid cardiovascular events and consequently reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality.

PS-C10-10: AWARENESS AND RECOMMENDATION OF HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT AMONG PHYSICIAN IN INDIA - RESULTS FROM ASIA HBPM SURVEY 2020

Background: In Asia Pacific region, 66% of deaths are caused from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) which are attributed to hypertension, and in India alone, ischemic heart disease and stroke are the top causes of death. Awareness of hypertension and blood pressure (BP) control rate are still low in India; therefore, physicians and patients hypertension education are important for increasing awareness and improving hypertension management. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recognized as a valuable tool to diagnose and support hypertension treatment including prevention of CVD and target organ damage. We explored the prevailing knowledge and current recommendation of HBPM in daily practice by physicians in India. Methods: As part of Asia HBPM Survey-2020, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care professionals from India between December 2020 to June 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions, including sub-questions, related to HBPM awareness and recommendations to patients. All analyses were performed using the proper statistical software and results were presented as descriptive data. Results: A total of 832 physicians participated in the survey. Almost 83% were male, whereas age, specialty and workplace were well distributed. Among physicians who recommend HBPM in the morning, more than 60% of respondents are giving instruction to their patients in alignment with local Indian hypertension guidelines regarding the body position and time of rest before measurement. Nevertheless, only 31% of physicians instruct their patients to measure their BP before taking anti-hypertensive drugs, while around 30% of physicians gave no instructions. A noticeable percentage of the physicians gave no instructions related to home BP measurement to their patients. Reference value of hypertension diagnosis amongst the physicians was substantially low based on clinic BP (34%) and home BP (15%). Among physicians who manage hypertensive patients, nearly 88% recommend HBPM to their patients, however, only 29% of their patients own HBPM device and 35% of the patients measure their own BP at home. Conclusions: The survey reveals that awareness of HBPM amongst physicians in India is low and instruction to their patients are either lacking or not well aligned with the local hypertension guidelines which may have led to the low HBPM rate among patients. Considering the challenges and limitations physicians face in daily practice, clear and practical educational material and sessions are needed to improve the understanding of HBPM amongst physicians.

PS-C07-4: COST EFFECTIVE SCREENING FOR BLOOD PRESSURE IN A LMIC: COMPARISON OF STANDARD AND RANDOM METHODS FOR HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING

Background: Hypertension is a leading risk factor for worldwide mortality and has become an important public health concern. Globally one billion people are suffering from hypertension and this rate may reach up to 1.56 billion by 2025. The prevalence of hypertension in Pakistani adults is upto 50%. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence and Pakistan Hypertension League guidelines recommend home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) for screening and diagnosis of hypertension in Pakistan; whereas, the current gold standard of hypertension diagnosis is still ABPM. However, the utility of HBPM is restricted due to the cumbersome standard method for HBPM, which requires timed blood pressure measurements pre-breakfast &amp; pre dinner.. We need pragmatic ways of measuring home blood pressure which will lead to higher patient compliance. Objective: To compare the limits of agreement between standard and random methods for HBPM in patients with or without hypertension. Design &amp; Method: A cross sectional study with n = 345 participants will be conducted in The Aga Khan University Hospital. After receiving due ethical approvals, participants 18 80 years of age will be recruited with or without hypertension. A HBPM device (OMRON M7 Intelli) will be provided to each participant for 14 days. In first week, BP readings will be taken as per standard method (2 readings pre breakfast &amp; 2 pre-dinner) and random method (6 readings anytime during a day) will be followed in subsequent week. Besides demographics, history of comorbid, medications status and BP charting, international physical activity questionnaire short form will be filled. SPSS software will be used for data management and analyses. Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland Altman plots and ROC curve will be used to determine the correlation limits of agreement and level of accuracy in predicting hypertension for both methods.

S-21-4: CURRENT REALITIES OF HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING FROM PHYSICIANS PERSPECTIVES: RESULTS FROM ASIA HBPM SURVEY 2020

Background: Uncontrolled hypertension is a significant problem in many parts of Asia. Effective management is essential to reduce the burden of hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a promising tool that can aid in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Experts from 11 countries/regions in Asia conceptualized a large-scale survey to examine the current realities of HBPM. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care professionals from China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam between November 2019 and June 2021. Physicians responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 7,951 physicians participated in the survey. Among all respondents, 50.3% and 33.5% viewed HBPM as highly recognized by physicians and patients in their country/region, respectively. Lack of understanding of HBPM and concern with the accuracy and reliability of HBPM devices were identified as key barriers to HBPM recognition. Nearly all physicians (95.9%) reported recommending HBPM to their patients; however, they reported less than 50% of their patients measured home blood pressure (HBP). Among physicians who recommended HBPM, only 22.4% and 54.1% cited HBP diagnostic threshold values and timing of taking antihypertensive drugs that were consistent with available guidelines, respectively. Conclusions: The survey reveals that the recognition of HBPM as a valuable tool to diagnose and manage hypertension is suboptimal in most parts of Asia. Despite high recommendation of HBPM to hypertensive patients by physicians, there are considerable discrepancies between guidelines recommendations and practice realities.

S-56-6: HOME BLOOD PRESSURE SURVEY IN SOUTHEAST AND EAST ASIA

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a promising tool that can aid in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Experts from 11 countries/regions in Asia conceptualized a large-scale survey to examine the current realities of HBPM. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care professionals from China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam between November 2019 and June 2021. Physicians’ responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. A total of 7,951 physicians participated in the survey. Among all respondents, 50.3% and 33.5% viewed HBPM as highly recognized by physicians and patients in their country/region, respectively. Lack of understanding of HBPM and concern with the accuracy and reliability of HBPM devices were identified as key barriers to HBPM recognition. Nearly all physicians (95.9%) reported recommending HBPM to their patients; however, they reported less than 50% of their patients measured home blood pressure (HBP). Among physicians who recommended HBPM, only 22.4% and 54.1% cited HBP diagnostic threshold values and timing of taking antihypertensive drugs that were consistent with available guidelines, respectively. The survey reveals that the recognition of HBPM as a valuable tool to diagnose and manage hypertension is suboptimal in most parts of Asia. Despite high recommendation of HBPM to hypertensive patients by physicians, there are considerable discrepancies between guidelines recommendations and practice realities.

Validation of Uright model TD 3127AT wireless-portable ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device with timer trigger modification, standard cuff size, in normotensive and mild hypertensive patients of Thailand registry (Thai valid ambulatory blood pressure monitoring).

Nowadays, automated blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices are commonly used by patients as a part of standard medical care for hypertension. The timer trigger was modified into a wireless automated home BP monitoring (HBPM) device to expand its potential use as ambulatory BP monitoring. However, the BP measurement accuracy in this modified device remains unknown. We aimed to assess the accuracy of Uright model TD 3127AT, which is an automated HBPM device with a timer trigger modification, following an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 guidelines in the Thai population. This cross-sectional study included normotensive and hypertensive Thai participants following the ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines from August 2021 to February 2022. This study aimed to compare the BP readings from an automated sphygmomanometer, Uright model TD 3127AT, TaiDoc Technology Corporation, with a timer trigger to a standard manual BP measurement. BPs were measured in 85 participants with a mean age ± SD of 38.39 ± 13.91 years, and 69% were females. The mean SBP ± SD (range) was 117.46 ± 18.63 (84-176) mmHg and the mean DBP ± SD (range) was 74.84 ± 10.70 (42-108) mmHg. The mean BP difference between observers and devices was 0.66 ± 6.81 mmHg for SBP and -0.96 ± 6.33 mmHg for DBP. The SD of the averaged pair determination per individual was ±4.45 mmHg for SBP and ±3.46 mmHg for DBP. The accuracy of the timer-triggered device was found to be acceptable when evaluated according to the ISO 81060-2: 2018 guidelines. An automated sphygmomanometer, Uright model TD 3127AT, TaiDoc Technology Corporation, with timer trigger modification passed the ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines.

2022 Thai Hypertension Society guidelines on home blood pressure monitoring.

In 2021, the Universal Health Coverage Payment Scheme of Thailand approved home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) devices for reimbursement. National utilization of HBPM devices will begin in 2022. This article provides the recommendations for HBPM from the Thai Hypertension Society. In this report, the authors review the benefits of HBPM and recommend confirming the diagnosis of hypertension by HBPM. Devices for HBPM should be the automated and validated upper arm cuff devices. HBPM should be ideally done for seven consecutive days before each clinic visit and take at least two readings (1 min apart) in the morning and before going to bed. The average blood pressure (BP) of 125–134/75–84 mmHg is classified as high normal BP and hypertension is BP of 135/85 mmHg or more. Target BP levels depend on the age of the patients; that is, < 125/75 mmHg for patients aged 18–65 years old, and <135/85 mmHg for patients over 65 years of age.

TASC (Telehealth After Stroke Care): a study protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility trial of telehealth-enabled multidisciplinary stroke care in an underserved urban setting

BackgroundHypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for recurrent stroke, and blood pressure (BP) reduction is associated with decreased risk of stroke recurrence. However, hypertension remains poorly controlled in many stroke survivors. Black and Hispanic patients have a higher prevalence of uncontrolled BP and higher rates of stroke. Limited access to care contributes to challenges in post-stroke care. Telehealth After Stroke Care (TASC) is a telehealth intervention that integrates remote BP monitoring (RBPM) including nursing telephone support, tailored BP infographics and telehealth video visits with a multidisciplinary team approach including pharmacy to improve post-stroke care and reduce stroke disparities.MethodsIn this pilot trial, 50 acute stroke patients with hypertension will be screened for inclusion prior to hospital discharge and randomized to usual care or TASC. Usual care patients will be seen by a primary care nurse practitioner at 1–2 weeks and a stroke neurologist at 1 and 3 months. In addition to these usual care visits, TASC intervention patients will see a pharmacist at 4 and 8 weeks and will be enrolled in RBPM consisting of home BP monitoring with interval calls by a centralized team of telehealth nurses. As part of RBPM, TASC patients will be provided with a home BP monitoring device and electronic tablet that wirelessly transmits home BP data to the electronic health record. They will also receive tailored BP infographics that help explain their BP readings. The primary outcome will be feasibility including recruitment, adherence to at least one video visit and retention rates. The clinical outcome for consideration in a subsequent trial will be within-patient change in BP from baseline to 3 months after discharge. Secondary outcomes will be medication adherence self-efficacy and satisfaction with post-stroke telehealth, both measured at 3 months. Additional patient reported outcomes will include depression, cognitive function, and socioeconomic determinants. Multidisciplinary team competency and fidelity measures will also be assessed.ConclusionsIntegrated team-based interventions may improve BP control and reduce racial/ethnic disparities in post-stroke care. TASC is a post-acute stroke care model that is novel in providing RBPM with tailored infographics, and a multidisciplinary team approach including pharmacy. Our pilot will determine if such an approach is feasible and effective in enhancing post-stroke BP control and promoting self-efficacy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04640519

Cuffless Blood Pressure Devices.

Hypertension is associated with more end-organ damage, cardiovascular events, and disability-adjusted life years lost in the United States compared with all other modifiable risk factors. Several guidelines and scientific statements now endorse the use of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring with ambulatory BP monitoring or home BP monitoring to confirm or exclude hypertension status based on office BP measurement. Current ambulatory or home BP monitoring devices have been reliant on the placement of a BP cuff, typically on the upper arm, to measure BP. There are numerous limitations to this approach. Cuff-based BP may not be well-tolerated for repeated measurements as is utilized with ambulatory BP monitoring. Furthermore, improper technique, including incorrect cuff placement or use of the wrong cuff size, may lead to erroneous readings, affecting diagnosis and management of hypertension. Compared with devices that utilize a cuff, cuffless BP devices may overcome challenges related to technique, tolerability, and overall utility in the outpatient setting. However, cuffless devices have several potential limitations that limit its routine use for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. The review discusses the different approaches for determining BP using various cuffless devices including engineering aspects of cuffless device technologies, validation protocols to test accuracy of cuffless devices, potential barriers to widespread implementation, and future areas of research. This review is intended for the clinicians who utilize out-of-office BP monitoring for the diagnosis and management of hypertension.

Choice of home blood pressure monitoring device: the role of device characteristics among Alaska Native and American Indian peoples

BackgroundHome blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is an effective tool in treatment and long-term management of hypertension. HBPM incorporates more data points to help patients and providers with diagnosis and management. The characteristics of HBPM devices matter to patients, but the relative importance of the characteristics in choosing a device remains unclear.MethodsWe used data from a randomized cross-over pilot study with 100 Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people with hypertension to assess the choice of a wrist or arm HBPM device. We use a random utility framework to evaluate the relationship between stated likely use, perceived accuracy, ease of use, comfort, and participant characteristics with choice of device. Additional analyses examined willingness to change to a more accurate device.ResultsParticipants ranked the wrist device higher compared to the arm on a 5-point Likert scale for likely use, ease of use, and comfort (0.3, 0.5, 0.8 percentage points, respectively). Most participants (66%) choose the wrist device. Likely use (wrist and arm devices) was related to the probability of choosing the wrist (0.7 and − 1.4 percentage points, respectively). Independent of characteristics, 75% of participants would be willing to use the more accurate device. Ease of use (wrist device) and comfort (arm device) were associated with the probability of changing to a more accurate device (− 1.1 and 0.5 percentage points, respectively).ConclusionUsability, including comfort, ease, and likely use, appeared to discount the relative importance of perceived accuracy in the device choice. Our results contribute evidence that ANAI populations value accurate HBPM, but that the devices should also be easy to use and comfortable to facilitate long-term management.

Reproducibility of nighttime home blood pressure measured by a wrist-type nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring device.

The authors investigated the reproducibility of nighttime home blood pressure (BP) measured by a wrist‐type BP monitoring device. Forty‐six hypertensive patients (mean 69.0±11.6 years, 56.5% male) self‐measured their nighttime BP hourly using simultaneously worn wrist‐type and upper arm‐type nocturnal home BP monitoring devices at home on two consecutive nights. Using the average 7.4±1.3 measurements on the first night and the average 7.0 ± 1.8 measurements on the second night, the authors assessed the reliability and the reproducibility of nighttime BP measured on the two nights. The difference between nights in systolic BP (SBP) measured by the wrist‐device was not significant (1.6±7.0 mmHg, p = .124), while the difference in diastolic BP (DBP) was marginally significant (1.4±4.9 mmHg, p = .050). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for agreement between nights were high both in SBP and DBP average (SBP: 0.835, DBP: 0.804). Averaging only three points of SBP resulted in lower ICC values, but still indicated good correlations (ICC > 0.6). On the other hand, the correlations of the standard deviation and average real variability of SBP between nights were low, with ICCs of 0.220 and 0.436, respectively. In conclusion, the average SBP values measured on the first night were reliable even when averaging only three readings. The reproducibility of nighttime BP variability seemed inferior to that of BP average; it might be better to measure nighttime BP over multiple nights to assess BP variability. However, this hypothesis needs verification in other study population. In addition, our study population had well‐controlled BP, which limits the generalizability of this findings to all hypertensive patients.