Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Research Articles

Participation interest and completion of home blood pressure measurements with mailed devices in adults with and without hypertension

Objectives: Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is valuable for the detection and monitoring of hypertension. Despite logistical advantages, HBPM has not yet been used in national blood pressure (BP) surveys. We investigated randomly selected adults’ willingness to participate in an HBPM study (attitude survey) and piloted this approach (feasibility study). Methods: The attitude survey, part of the 2020 population representative cross-sectional telephone interview survey, German Health Update (GEDA), assessed willingness to self-measure BP on three days in the morning and evening in 6517 participants. Descriptive analyses and weighted log-binomial regression were used to examine associations between willingness to participate in HBPM and sociodemographic and health factors. The feasibility study piloted self-measurements with mailed devices, video instructions, and before and after online interviews with 258 commercial panel volunteers. Results: In the attitude survey, 38% of randomly selected adults expressed willingness to participate in the HBPM study. Willingness to participate was associated with higher education [risk ratio (RR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37–1.94] and medium education (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09–1.56) compared to low education, ages 18–39 (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.45–1.97) and 40–59 (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.20–1.58) compared to participants from age 60s, and self-reported hypertension (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04–1.36). In the feasibility study, 43% (n = 110) of those receiving a device completed the study. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that national BP studies cannot rely solely on HBPM because selective participation would yield biased results. However, HBPM may be used in other epidemiological studies, such as longitudinal studies.

Discrepancies between home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: analysis from the Korean resistant hypertension cohort.

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aRH) enrolled from 15 tertiary care centers in South Korea. aRH was defined as having uncontrolled office BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving three classes of antihypertensive medication or any level of BP despite receiving ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication. Patients with complete data for office BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and home BP measurements at baseline were included. BP control status between ABPM and home BP measurements was compared. Out of 1457 patients, 823 meeting the enrollment criteria were included (mean age: 59.9 ± 13.6 years; 57.5% male patients). Among them, 7.2% had controlled BP, 8.7% had whitecoat uncontrolled hypertension, 15.1% had masked uncontrolled hypertension, and 69% had sustained hypertension, as measured through baseline ABPM. Additionally, 43% of patients with controlled BP based on home BP measurement had nocturnal hypertension. Relying solely on home BP measurement may result in misclassifying 70% of patients as having either controlled BP or whitecoat uncontrolled BP. This study reaffirms the circadian pattern of resistant hypertension, characterized by a higher prevalence of non-dipping and rising patterns, even in patients with BP controlled based on ABPM. Considering the persistent difference between home BP measurement and ABPM, even at a lower home BP threshold, integrating both measurements into the management of aRH is advisable.

Abstract 4138663: Peak nocturnal home blood pressure as an early and strong novel risk factor for stroke: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP Nocturnal BP study

Background: Clinical implications of high peak nighttime home blood pressure (BP) are currently unknown. This analysis investigated the association between peak nighttime home systolic BP (SBP) and cardiovascular events in individuals with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor. Methods: In the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study, nighttime home BP was automatically measured three times every night for 14 days at baseline using a nighttime home BP monitoring device (HEM-5001, Omron Healthcare). Peak nighttime home SBP was defined as average of the highest three values over the 14-night measurement period. Occurrence of cardiovascular events (stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, aortic dissection) was determined over a mean 7.1 years’ follow-up. Results: This analysis included 2545 individuals (mean age 63.3±10.3 years, 49% male). After adjustment for covariates (including age, sex, and average office, morning, evening, and nighttime home SBP), stroke risk was significantly higher in individuals with peak nighttime home SBP in the highest (Q5, ≥149.0 mmHg) versus lowest quintile (Q1, <119.3 mmHg) (hazard ratio [HR] 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–16.77; p=0.039 overall and 8.92, 1.49–53.43; p=0.017 in the subgroup with ≥6 nighttime home SBP measurements). This increased stroke risk remained significant after controlling for day-by-day average real variability of nighttime BP. The average peak nighttime home SBP cut-off value for predicting an increased risk of incident stroke was 136 mmHg. Conclusions: We propose exaggerated peak nighttime home SBP determined from ≥6 measurements as a novel risk factor for stroke, independent of conventional office and home BP values.

Relationship between blood pressure variability and blood pressure phenotypes: a home blood pressure monitoring study.

Home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and BP phenotypes such as white-coat hypertension (WCH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked hypertension (MH) and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) are predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. This study compared home BPV across BP phenotypes built from abnormal office BP (OBP) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) thresholds defined by three distinct societies [European Society of Hypertension (ESH): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA): OBP and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg and Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg]. This cross-sectional study evaluated 51 194 treated (37% men, age = 61 ± 15 years) and 56 100 untreated (41% men, age = 54 ± 16 years) individuals from 1045 Brazilian centers who underwent OBP and HBPM measurements. Systolic and diastolic home BPV were estimated as the: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the variability independent of the mean of HBPM. Results of adjusted analysis showed that home BPV parameters were significantly greater in individuals with WCH/WUCH according to the BSC criteria, in those with MH/MUCH defined by the ACC/AHA criteria, and tended to be greater in individuals with either MH/MUCH or WCH/WUCH defined by the ESH criteria.Furthermore, restricted cubic spline analysis showed a U-shaped association between BPV and the difference between OBP and HBPM in treated and untreated individuals. Home BPV was greater in WCH/WUCH and/or MH/MUCH depending on the criteria used to define abnormal OBP and HBPM thresholds. These findings underscore the need to standardize abnormal BP criteria in clinical practice.

Desprescribing antihypertensives in older people in primary care: subgroup analysis of the MINOR randomised clinical trial.

Polypharmacy is often required for older adults with hypertension, and excessive treatment is associated with a high risk of adverse reactions, including hypotension. To evaluate the deprescribing of antihypertensive medications guided by pharmacists using home blood pressure monitoring in older adults with hypotension. A subgroup of older adults with signs or symptoms of hypotension, included in the MINOR clinical trial, was analysed. In the MINOR procedures, each patient was provided with a device to conduct blood pressure measurement at home for 1week, following which a report was generated and shared with pharmacists (intervention group) or family physicians (control group). In the intervention group, a pharmacist suggested optimising pharmacotherapy; meanwhile, in the control group, a family physician alone determined the necessary treatment adjustments. Differences in mean blood pressure, the patients with symptoms/signs of hypotension, and the antihypertensive medication deprescribing between both groups were analysed. Seventy-two patients were evaluated (35, control group; 37, intervention group). The intervention group showed a significant reduction in medication prescriptions (- 28.6%; P < 0.001), especially beta-blockers (- 74.2%), loop diuretics (- 83.3%), and aldosterone antagonists (- 80%). The mean office blood pressure in the intervention group increased (14.1mmHg systolic and 6.9mmHg diastolic), remaining below the target range (140/90mmHg). The intervention group showed a significantly reduction in hypotensive symptoms than the control group (64.9% vs. 20%) (P < 0.001). The data highlight an important role for pharmacists in optimizing hypertension management in older people. Deprescribing antihypertensives can limit symptomatic hypotension. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT04861727.

Assessment of appropriate utilization of out-of-office diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of hypertension

ABSTRACT Background: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement devices, such as ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM), enhance the accuracy and reliability of BP readings, detecting white-coat and masked hypertension. The American Heart Association (AHA) advises confirming hypertension diagnoses with ABPM to prevent overdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of precise out-of-office diagnostic tools. This study aimed to 1) explore the prevalence of ABPM and HBPM use prior to hypertension diagnosis; 2) assess the adherence to AHA recommendations regarding ABPM utilization; and 3) investigate the association between patient characteristics and out-of-office BP monitoring practices. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a random sample of adult patients newly diagnosed with essential hypertension at a tertiary hospital primary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2022. Results: This study evaluated the use of ABPM and HBPM in a sample of 268 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, with a mean age of 49.17 ± 12.69 years. Although ABPM orders were placed for 57.8% of patients, only 48.5% completed the procedure. Notably, 42.2% of hypertension diagnoses were solely based on ABPM, while 7.1% and 1.1% utilized HBPM alone or in combination with ABPM, respectively. This analysis revealed a lower utilization of ABPM among older adults, individuals with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and married patients (P &lt; 0.05). However, this association with marital status, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease was no longer statistically significant in a fully adjusted model (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: Out-of-office BP monitoring, particularly ABPM, was underutilized in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially in older age groups and patients with specific comorbidities, who may benefit the most from this method. These results underscore the need for increasing physician knowledge and compliance with the existing guidelines.

Correlation between postdialysis blood pressure assessed at different time points and home blood pressure monitoring

Abstract Background Hemodialysis patients undergo blood pressure (BP) measurements during the predialysis, intradialytic and postdialysis (POSBP) periods at the dialysis sessions. However, there is no consensus regarding the time point when POSBP measurement should be performed. Purpose This study investigated the relationship of POSBP measurements performed at different time points with home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Methods This prospective study included 98 long-term dialysis patients (67% men; age=59.4 ±17.7 years; 79% using antihypertensive medications). During one week, POSBP measurements were obtained in sitting patients by trained health staff using oscillometric BP monitors lodged in the dialysis machines at all dialysis sessions in three different periods: 1) immediately after the dialysis period ended (POSBP1); 2) after returning the patient's blood (POSBP2) and 3) after hemostasis of the fistula or catheter sealing (POSBP3). In the same week, HBPM was performed using validated devices and was calculated as the mean of BP measurements obtained on six consecutive days, comprising three readings in the morning and in the evening after at least 3 min of rest, before antihypertensive medications were taken, with the patients seated. Abnormal BP was defined as HBPM≥135/85 mmHg. Based on the optimal cut-point values derived from ROC curves analysis, we built cutoffs for POSBP1 (143/79 mmHg), POSBP2 (153/78 mmHg) and POSBP3 (151/80 mmHg) corresponding to HBPM values of 135/85 mmHg. Results The values of POSBP1, POSBP2, POSBP3 and HBPM were 138±21/72±13, 143±24/73±13, 142±22/72±13 and 128±19/76±13 mmHg, respectively. Systolic HBPM showed greater correlation with systolic POSBP3 (r=0.71), followed by POSBP1 (r=0.68), POSBP2 (r=0.67), while diastolic HBPM showed greater correlation with diastolic POSBP2 and POSBP3 (both r=0.56), followed by POSBP1 (r=0.49) (all p&amp;lt;0.05). The POSBP3 cutoff showed the highest association (odds ratio [95% CI]= 8.06 [3.21, 20.27]), accuracy (area under the curve [95% CI]= 0.74 [0.65, 0.83]) and concordance (kappa coefficient=0.47) to identify elevated BP at HBPM in comparison with the POSBP1 and POSBP2 cutoffs (Figure). Conclusion(s) POSBP3 exhibited the strongest correlation with HBPM and had the highest accuracy to detect elevated HBPM in dialysis patients and may be a potentially preferable POSBP measurement in clinical practice.

Design and implementation of digital home blood pressure monitoring based on Bluetooth and WeChat App in the FAIR-Pilot study

Abstract Background Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) could be an alternative way to office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for hypertensive patient management. However, the measurement protocol of HBPM still requires standardization, which may be improved by digital technology. Purpose To investigate the use of digital HBPM management in hypertensive patients and its application in clinical practice. Methods Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renal Hypertension Patients (FAIR)-pilot study is a multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial exploring the application of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide the renal artery stenting in patients with renovascular hypertension. After randomization and FFR measurement, participants were divided into stenting with FFR≥ 0.8 (Stent group), no stent implantation with FFR≥ 0.8 (No stent group), and stenting with FFR＜ 0.8 (Controlled group). Participants of the FAIR-pilot study enrolled from February 1st, 2023 to February 25th, 2024 were included. A validated Bluetooth blood pressure monitor was given to every participant at the time of enrollment. Participants were taught to undertake standardized HBP and were advised to take morning and night HBPs every day. HBPM data were automatically uploaded to a WeChat App developed by FAIR investigators and could be reviewed by both participants and investigators. Twice-daily blood pressure reports were automatically generated and sent to investigators for participant compliance monitoring and reminding (Figure 1). HBPM data and blood pressure variability were analyzed. Results A total of 93 participants with 58 males (62.4%) and a mean age of 59.97 ± 16.18 years, including 26,802 HBP readings were analyzed. The average numbers of daily HBP measurement were similar between three groups and were all less than twice a day. Systolic HBP decreased from 143.11 ± 14.91 to 133.01 ± 13.01mmHg after the procedure in the Controlled group, which was more than the other two groups (140.51 ± 13.38 to 138.53 ± 17.30 mmHg and 136.20 ± 15.67 to 130.84 ± 11.04 mmHg). During the follow-up after the procedure, the HBP variability (BPV) of overall participants was 13.78 ± 4.87 and 5.46 ± 3.14 for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. The systolic BPV of No stent group was higher than the other two groups (No stent vs. Stent vs. Controlled: 33.00 ± 9.49 vs. 8.34 ± 2.86 vs. 9.12 ± 2.71, P=0.125), however without statistical significance. Similar was found for morning and night systolic BPVs. (Table 1). Conclusion Digital HBPM management via novel information technology is feasible in the hypertension field and could be a helpful tool in clinical practice.

Cardiovascular events risk in office-masked nocturnal hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring: the J-HOP nocturnal blood pressure study

Abstract Background Elevated nocturnal home blood pressure (BP) has been reported to be associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Masked hypertension defined by home BP monitoring is also a strong risk factor for adverse CVD outcomes. However, no study has investigated the association between office-masked nocturnal hypertension defined by home BP monitoring and CVD events risk. Purpose This study aimed to examine the association between office-masked nocturnal hypertension defined by home BP monitoring and CVD events risk in a clinical practice-based population. Methods This was a prospective observational study including Japanese participants with CVD or high risk of CVD. Three office BPs were taken on two different occasions. Nocturnal home BP was measured three times per night for two weeks. The association between office-masked nocturnal hypertension and incident total CVD events (including fatal and non-fatal stroke and coronary heart disease) was examined using Cox regression. Results 2,545 participants were followed for the mean of 7.1 years (18,116 person-years), during which 152 (6.0%) CVD events occurred. Mean age (standard deviation) was 63.3 (10.3) years; 49.0% were male; 82.6% took antihypertensive medications. The proportions of participants with normotension (office BP &amp;lt;140/90 mmHg and nocturnal home BP &amp;lt;120/70 mmHg), white-coat hypertension (office BP ≥140/90 mmHg and nocturnal home BP &amp;lt;120/70 mmHg), office-masked nocturnal hypertension (office BP &amp;lt;140/90 mmHg and nocturnal home BP ≥120/70 mmHg), and sustained hypertension (office BP ≥140/90 mmHg and nocturnal home BP ≥120/70 mmHg) were 25.3%, 14.4%, 23.2%, and 37.1%, respectively. The office-masked nocturnal hypertensive group and sustained hypertensive group had higher incidence rates of total CVD events compared with the normotensive group. Relative to normotension, those with both office-masked nocturnal hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–2.92) and sustained hypertension (aHR 1.75, 95%CI 1.03–2.96) had similarly increased CVD risk, even after adjustment for daytime home BP values. Conclusions Screening for office-masked nocturnal hypertension with home BP monitoring identifies a potentially important group of patients with increased risk for incident CVD events for whom additional preventative measures may be appropriate.

Concept, study design, and baseline nighttime blood pressure control status of the WISDOM-Night Study using a wrist-type oscillometric home blood pressure monitoring device.

There is growing evidence that nocturnal hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure. However, brachial blood pressure (BP) measurements during sleep might themselves disturb sleep quality. We initiated a nationwide, multicenter observational prospective study using a wrist-type oscillometric nighttime BP monitoring device with new algorithms to measure supine BP accurately without sleep disturbance. This study, named the Wrist ICT-based Sleep and Circadian Blood Pressure Monitoring Program-Night BP Study (WISDOM-Night Study), was designed to clarify the impact of wrist-measured daily nighttime BPs on cardiovascular prognosis (stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, etc.) using 7 days of BP measurements at 2:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., and 4 h after bedtime. A total of 2751 patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors were recruited between March 2021 and March 2024 and are currently being followed up for 7 years. Additionally, 1416 of the WISDOM-Night Study-enrolled patients who also agreed to participate in the WISDOM-Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage (HMOD) Study underwent echocardiography to evaluate the association between wrist-measured BP and left ventricular structure. Data from this WISDOM-Night Study should provide the prospective association between nighttime BP and cardiovascular disease and reveal the indexes of nighttime BP with clinical pathological relevance. This first report of the WISDOM-Night Study describes the study design, baseline characteristics, and BP control status.

Prevalence of masked and white-coat hypertension among individuals with diabetes: insights from web-based home blood pressure monitoring in the Brazilian population.

The association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and masked hypertension (MH) in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is established, but its relationship with home BP monitoring (HBPM) remains uncertain. This web-based database study compared BP phenotypes in individuals using (n = 51,194; 6.05% with DM) and not using (n = 55,320; 0.63% with DM) antihypertensive medications (AH) undergoing HBPM. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed similar MH and white-coat hypertension (WCH) prevalence in individuals with or without DM, irrespective of AH use. However, among AH non-users, DM was associated with a higher likelihood of normotension (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.09-1.66; p = 0.006) and a lower likelihood of sustained hypertension (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.99; p = 0.039) compared to individuals without DM. These findings suggest that while DM does not significantly impact MH and WCH in HBPM, it may influence normotension and sustained hypertension rates in AH non-users. Likelihood of diabetes mellitus according to blood pressure phenotypes. AH - antihypertensive medications; CH - controlled hypertension; MH - masked hypertension; MUCH - masked uncontrolled hypertension; NT - normotension; SH - sustained hypertension; SUCH - sustained uncontrolled hypertension; WCH - white-coat hypertension; WUCH - white-coat uncontrolled hypertension.

Sleep blood pressure measured using a home blood pressure monitor was independently associated with cardiovascular disease incidence: the Nagahama study.

Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is associated with cardiovascular disease independently of awake BP. However, nocturnal BP measured using an ambulatory monitoring device has limited reproducibility because it is a single-day measurement. We investigated the association between sleep BP measured on multiple days using a timer-equipped home BP monitor and cardiovascular diseases in a general population. The study population comprised 5814 community residents. Participants were required to sleep with wrapping cuffs on their upper arm and BP was measured automatically at 0 : 00, 2 : 00, and 4 : 00. Actigraph was used to determine BP measured during sleep. Participants were also measured home morning and evening BP manually using the same device. During the 7.3-year mean follow-up period, we observed 117 cases of cardiovascular diseases. The association between sleep BP (per 10 mmHg hazard ratio = 1.31, P < 0.001) and cardiovascular events remained significant (hazard ratio = 1.22, P = 0.036) even after adjusting for office BP and confounding factors, such as sleep-disordered breathing. Individuals with sleep-only hypertension ( n = 1047; hazard ratio = 2.23, P = 0.005) had a significant cardiovascular risk. Daytime-only hypertension ( n = 264; hazard ratio = 3.57, P = 0.001) and combined sleep and daytime hypertension ( n = 1216; hazard ratio = 3.69, P < 0.001) was associated with cardiovascular events to the same extent. Sleep BP dipping was not identified as a significant determinant of cardiovascular events. Sleep BP measured using a home BP monitor was independently associated with the incidence of cardiovascular disease in a general population.

Intensive Home Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients with Advanced CKD

Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP. Non-blinded randomized controlled trial. 108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension. Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time. The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation. The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05). Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design. A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.

Differences in ambulatory versus home blood pressure levels by ethnicity: data from the United Kingdom and Japan.

This study tested the hypothesis that differences in ethnicity impact the level of agreement between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and home BP (HBP) levels. A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the UK and Japan was performed. Participants underwent office BP, daytime ABP, and HBP measurements. The ABP-HBP difference was compared between ethnic groups by multiple linear regression analysis. Diagnostic disagreement was defined as a disparity between the hypertension diagnoses obtained using ABP and HBP, since both measures share common thresholds of 135/85 mmHg for hypertension. Definite diagnostic disagreement was assigned where such a difference exceeded ±5 mmHg for either systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP). A total of 1 408 participants (age 62.1 ± 11.1 years, 48.6% males, 78.9% known hypertensive, White British 18.9%, South Asian 11.2%, African Caribbean 12.0%, Japanese 58.0%) were eligible. More Japanese participants showed higher ABP than HBP compared to White British: SBP + 3.09 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) + 1.14, +5.04 mmHg; DBP + 5.67 mmHg, 95%CI + 4.51, +6.84 mmHg. More Japanese participants than African Caribbean participants exhibited diagnostic disagreement in SBP (33.2% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, Japanese participants had a higher percentage of definite diagnostic disagreement in SBP compared to White British (9.3% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.040) and African Caribbean participants (9.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.018). In conclusion, Japanese participants showed greater disparity between ABP and HBP compared to White British participants. Complementary use of ABP and HBP monitoring may be more beneficial for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in Japanese participants compared to other ethnic groups.

User engagement with home blood pressure monitoring: a multinational cohort using real-world data collected with a connected device.

Connected blood pressure (BP) monitors provide reliable data when used properly. Our objective was to analyse the engagement of real-world users with self-measurements. We included adult first-time users of a connected BP monitor from July 2019 to March 2021. They were categorized as persistent users if they continued to use the device between 311 and 400 days after inclusion. We defined a criterion to analyse the timing of self-measurements: at least 12 measurements performed within three consecutive days, at least once every 90 days. Persistent users were clustered by state sequence analysis according to the consistency of their BP monitor measurement timing with this criterion during 1 year of follow-up. Among the 22 177 included users, 11 869 (54%) were persistent during the first year. Their use was consistent with the timing criterion 25% (median) of this time (first and third quartiles: 0%, 50%) and four patterns of use were identified by clustering: 5215 persistent users (44%) only performed occasional sparse measurements, 4054 (34%) complied at the start of follow-up up to eight cumulated months, 1113 (9%) complied at least once during later follow-up up to eight cumulated months, and the remaining 1487 (13%) complied nine or more cumulated months of follow-up. Although connected BP monitors can collect a high volume of data, the real-life timing of self-measurements is far from recommended schedules. We must promote the use of BP monitors as recommended by guidelines and/or learn to analyse more occasional and sparse measurements.

Abstract P107: Training for home blood pressure monitoring among women with a diagnosis or risk factors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among pregnant women. Despite the potential benefits of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) for early diagnosis and monitoring of patients with HDP, its utilization is limited by inconsistent training by healthcare providers. This study sought to examine the use of and training for HBPM in those at risk for HDP. Methods: Pregnant women, aged 20-50 (N = 103), diagnosed with either hypertension, HDP, or risk factors for HDP, were recruited from a large academic medical center to complete a survey on HBPM practices from June 2020 to January 2024. Thisincluded questions about HBPM, frequency of HBPM, and prior HBPM training provision by providers. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA/BE 18.0. Results: Of the 103 participants, 41 (39.8%) did HBPM and the most common frequency was daily (70.7%). Of those who did HBPM, 36.6% had received training from their healthcare providers and 31.7% had their BP monitors calibrated in the clinic. There was a trend towards Hispanic women being less likely to receive training compared to white women ( p =0.07). There were no significant differences in training across categories of education and location of residence. Conclusion: In this sample where nearly 40% of pregnant women used HBPM, we observed that only 1 in 3 received training for HBPM with little difference observed across demographic categories. Given the time constraints in clinic visits hindering appropriate training for HBPM, exploring alternative methods of HBPM training such as leveraging mobile health applications may be beneficial to ensure that pregnant women receive necessary training to effectively conduct HBPM.

Abstract P317: Are Home Blood Pressure Devices Accurate? A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Background: Out of office blood pressure (BP) measurements, especially home BP monitoring, are recommended for diagnosis and management of hypertension by all professional societies and guidelines. Though validation protocols exist for individual monitors, little data exists on the real world accuracy of home BP monitors, in actual use. We undertook this systematic review to estimate the accuracy of home BP monitors as reported in the literature. Methods: We undertook a literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1946 and 1947 until April 2023 respectively. We included studies that evaluated the accuracy of home BP devices against manual BP considered as the gold standard. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed quality. Disagreements between the two reviewers were resolved by a third author. Results: Our search revealed 1284 non-duplicate citations. After applying selection criteria, nineteen studies, involving 4954 patient-devices (median 91, interquartile range 69, 489) were included in the systematic review. The reported inaccuracy of home BP monitors compared to mercury sphygmomanometer ranged from 10% to 72% for systolic BP, with each study using different thresholds for inaccuracy. The absolute mean difference for systolic BP between home BP monitor and the standard ranged from 2.4 mm Hg to 10.4 mm Hg and for diastolic BP from 1 to 8.7 mm Hg. Conclusion: The existing literature reports a relatively high degree of inaccuracy in home BP monitors being used. Data is limited by varying definitions being used for reporting inaccuracy. Consideration should be given to standardised definitions of accuracy, and individual patient validation of accuracy as home BP monitors use for clinical decision making becomes widespread.

P073 KNOWLEDGE OF HYPERTENSION AND HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING AMONG HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS IN INDIA: RESULTS FROM THE GRAND STUDY

Background and Objective: Hypertension remains a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in India, contributing substantially to cardiovascular mortality. Despite the rising prevalence of hypertension, blood pressure control among hypertensive patients remains low, emphasizing the need for improved hypertension management and treatment. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) serves as a vital tool in hypertension management, yet its recognition and utilization in developing countries like India remain limited. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of hypertension and HBPM among hypertensive patients across 18 medical centers in 12 States in India. Methods: A survey was conducted among 1,920 hypertensive patients, analyzing the patients’ background, the reasons for home blood pressure (HBP) measurement and non-HBP measurement, and associated factors to knowledge levels of hypertension and HBPM. Results: Findings revealed that 47.5% were measuring HBP, with reasons mainly attributed to physicians’ recommendations, while cost and lack of physician guidance were common reasons for non-HBP measurement. High knowledge levels of hypertension and HBPM significantly associated with measuring HBP (OR 16.23; 11.28-23.35, P-value &lt;0.001), however, a significant gap existed in adherence to the optimal guidelines-based procedures of HBPM with only 40.7% following any 2 out of 8 steps to measure HBP. Conclusions: These results highlight the necessity for increased physicians’ recommendations of HBP measurement and providing clear instructions for measuring HBP aligned with guideline-based procedures.

P154 GETTING OPTIMAL AND TARGET BLOOD PRESSURE IS MORE CHALLENGING FOR HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH ANOTHER CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) compared with office-based monitoring could be better at predicting cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Patients and Methods: This project aimed to evaluate HBPM in adult pts with AH. It was conducted from April to June 2022 at 178 general physicians practices in Slovakia. Results: 4375 pts with AH were enrolled (2089 women, 51,8%), mean age 61,1 ± 19,1 years. BP values at HBPM decreased over the period of seven days by -2.2/-1.4 mm Hg (p &lt; 0.01). The first treatment goal, office BP ≤ 140/90 mm Hg, was achieved by 67% of patients. The second treatment goal, based on patients’ age was achieved by 35% of patients. The number of patients with CV comorbidities surpassed 48.8%. They were significantly older 67,3± 15,2 years vs 57,1 ± 12,6 years (p&lt;0,01), with a higher BMI of 30,1± 5,2 kg/m2vs 28,7 ± 3,8 kg/m2 (p&lt;0,01) in comparison with patients without CV comorbidities. In HBPM patients with CV comorbidities have higher both systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) 134,8 ± 11,2/80,3± 7,6 mmHg vs 131,9±8,2/80,4 ±6,4 mmHg (p&lt;0,01). To compare with office blood pressure measurements: higher SBP was in patients with CV comorbidities 137,1 ±18,1 mmHg vs 135,2 ±16,3 mmHg (p 0,516), higher DBP was in patients without CV comorbidities 81,5 ±6,4 mmHg vs 80,3 ± 5,1 mmHg (p&lt;0,01). Dyslipidemia was present in 67% of patients. Women were more likely to have dyslipidemia and hypertension 68,8% vs 65,5% (p=0.03) in men. Conclusions: The results of office and home BPM 2022 demonstrated active involvement of patients in the management of AH can have a significant impact. We need to be more consistent in treating AH, according to 2023 ESH guidelines, mainly in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. By achieving a 67% success rate in control of AH patients, The Charter 70/2023 is imminent.

Abstract P324: Masked Hypertension Mimicking Migraine: A Case Report with Diagnostic Odyssey

Introduction: Masked hypertension (MH) involves normal office blood pressure but elevated readings outside clinical settings, increasing cardiovascular and neurological risks. About 10-30% of the population may have MH, often undiagnosed. This case highlights the importance of considering MH. Case Presentation: A 42-year-old woman had recurrent headaches for six months: bilateral, pulsating pain in the temples, with dizziness and occasional vomiting, lasting 2-4 hours, worsening after work. Diagnosed with migraines and treated with sumatriptan without relief. Medical history included a caesarean section; otherwise, she was healthy. Physical exam showed normal vital signs, including blood pressure at 130/80 mmHg. Neurological and ophthalmological evaluations were normal. Lab investigations were unremarkable. The patient had a normal BMI of 21.3. Further workup, including ECG, MRI, CT scan, and neck radiography, all normal. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) revealed elevated blood pressure during evening hours (post work), starting around 4 pm and rising until 8-9 pm. Thereafter, blood pressure normalized to 110-130 mmHg systolic and 70-80 mmHg diastolic. To rule out nephrogenic hypertension, an ultrasound of the kidneys, renal function tests, urinalysis, and plasma metanephrine tests were negative. Following the exclusion of other causes, a diagnosis of MH was established. The patient started on Telmisartan 20 mg daily, with lifestyle modifications. Follow-up ABPM showed normalized blood pressure, and the patient reported no further headaches. Discussion: MH affects many but often remains undiagnosed due to normal clinic readings. Ambulatory or home blood pressure monitoring is essential for diagnosis. Timely diagnosis of MH is crucial, given its association with heightened risks of stroke and cardiovascular disease. Studies have revealed significantly elevated left ventricular mass index, maximal intima-media thickness, and urinary albumin levels. Consequences include left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid atherosclerosis, and albuminuria. Conclusion: Early recognition and management of MH are vital for preventing complications. Diagnosis can be achieved by home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. This case stresses considering MH in patients with normal office readings but persistent symptoms, advocating for regular monitoring and patient education for optimal health outcomes.