Home-based Primary Care Research Articles

Defining and Validating Criteria to Identify Populations Who May Benefit From Home-Based Primary Care.

Home-based primary care (HBPC) is an important care delivery model for high-need older adults. Currently, target patient populations vary across HBPC programs, hindering expansion and large-scale evaluation. Develop and validate criteria that identify appropriate HBPC target populations. A modified Delphi process was used to achieve expert consensus on criteria for identifying HBPC target populations. All criteria were defined and validated using linked data from Medicare claims and the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) (cohort n=21,727). Construct validation involved assessing demographics and health outcomes/expenditures for selected criteria. Delphi panelists (n=29) represented diverse professional perspectives. Criteria were validated on community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (age above 70) enrolled in NHATS. Criteria were selected via Delphi questionnaires. For construct validation, sociodemographic characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries were self-reported in NHATS, and annual health care expenditures and mortality were obtained via linked Medicare claims. Panelists proposed an algorithm of criteria for HBPC target populations that included indicators for serious illness, functional impairment, and social isolation. The algorithm's Delphi-selected criteria applied to 16.8% of Medicare beneficiaries. These HBPC target populations had higher annual health care costs [Med (IQR): $10,851 (3316, 31,556) vs. $2830 (913, 9574)] and higher 12-month mortality [15% (95% CI: 14, 17) vs. 5% (95% CI: 4, 5)] compared with the total validation cohort. We developed and validated an algorithm to define target populations for HBPC, which suggests a need for increased HBPC availability. By enabling objective identification of unmet demands for HBPC access or resources, this algorithm can foster robust evaluation and equitable expansion of HBPC.

The quality of home-based primary care delivered by nurse practitioners: A national Medicare claims analysis.

As the US population ages, there is an increasing demand for home-based primary care (HBPC) by those with Alzheimer's/dementia, multiple chronic conditions, severe physical limitations, or those facing end-of life. Nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly providing HBPC, yet little is known about their quality of care in this unique setting. This observational study uses Medicare claims data from 2018 to assess the quality of care for high-intensity HBPC users (5 or more visits/year) based on provider type (NP-only, physician (MD)-only, or both NP and MDs). We employ 12 quality measures from 3 care domains: access and prevention, acute care utilization, and end-of-life. Analysis includes bivariate comparisons and logistic regression models that adjust for demographic, clinical, and geographic characteristics. Among the 574,567 beneficiaries with 5 or more HBPC visits, 37% saw an NP, 37% saw a MD, and 27% saw both NPs and MDs. In multivariate models, those receiving HBPC from an NP or both NP-MD are significantly more likely to receive a flu shot than the MD-only group, but less likely to access preventive care. NP-only care is associated with more acute care hospitalizations, avoidable ED visits, and fall-related injuries, but significantly fewer avoidable admissions. For end-of-life care, those with NP-only or both NP-MD care are significantly more likely to have an advanced directive, be in hospice in the last 3 days of life, and more likely to die in hospice. The NP group is also more likely to die in the next year. HBPC patients are complex, with both palliative and curative needs. NPs provide almost half of HBPC in the Medicare program, to patients who are possibly sicker than those treated by physicians, with similar quality to MDs.

The role of primary healthcare amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the Family Health Strategy in Brazil

This paper investigates the role of primary healthcare in mitigating the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the Brazilian Family Health Strategy (ESF) as a case study. ESF is Brazil’s major primary care initiative, with prior evidence indicating its effectiveness in improving various health outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic submitted the Brazilian healthcare system to a rigorous and unprecedented stress test, whose repercussions are still under study. Using comprehensive administrative microdata from 2016 to 2022 encompassing dimensions related to mortality, healthcare service, supply of family health teams, and vaccination coverage, our empirical strategy accounts for heterogeneous effects based on program intensity and pandemic evolution of the 5570 Brazilian municipalities. Our findings reveal that municipalities with high-intensity of ESF coverage (i.e. stronger primary care) experienced 347.93 (95% CI: 289.04, 406.81) fewer COVID-19 and cardiorespiratory deaths per million inhabitants throughout the pandemic period, compared to those in low-intensity ESF areas, despite sharing similar profiles of deaths from respiratory and cardiovascular causes. Among the channels contributing to this relative performance, high-intensity ESF municipalities were found to engage in more home-based primary care visits and health promotion activities while maintaining a similar supply of community health workers. Additionally, they achieved higher vaccination coverage, and these effects were more pronounced in areas with greater ESF presence, emphasising the importance of primary care coverage. In conclusion, our findings underscore the relevance of strong primary care in mitigating the consequences of the pandemic and addressing post-pandemic health challenges.

Trajectories and Transitions in Service Use Among Older Veterans at High Risk of Long-Term Institutional Care.

We aimed to identify combinations of long-term services and supports (LTSS) Veterans use, describe transitions between groups, and identify factors influencing transition. We explored LTSS across a continuum from home to institutional care. Analyses included 104,837 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients 66 years and older at high-risk of long-term institutional care (LTIC). We conduct latent class and latent transition analyses using VHA and Medicare data from fiscal years 2014 to 2017. We used logistic regression to identify variables associated with transition. We identified 5 latent classes: (1) No Services (11% of sample in 2015); (2) Medicare Services (31%), characterized by using LTSS only in Medicare; (3) VHA-Medicare Care Continuum (19%), including LTSS use in various settings across VHA and Medicare; (4) Personal Care Services (21%), characterized by high probabilities of using VHA homemaker/home health aide or self-directed care; and (5) Home-Centered Interdisciplinary Care (18%), characterized by a high probability of using home-based primary care. Veterans frequently stayed in the same class over the three years (30% to 46% in each class). Having a hip fracture, self-care impairment, or severe ambulatory limitation increased the odds of leaving No Services, and incontinence and dementia increased the odds of entering VHA-Medicare Care Continuum. Results were similar when restricted to Veterans who survived during all 3 years of the study period. Veterans at high risk of LTIC use a combination of services from across the care continuum and a mix of VHA and Medicare services. Service patterns are relatively stable for 3 years.

Characteristics Associated With Homebound Vaccination Against COVID-19

ObjectivesHomebound patients are older and suffer from multiple comorbidities, and many experienced difficulties getting vaccinated because of their inability to routinely leave the home due to health and function. Home-based primary care (HBPC) programs offer vaccination at home to reach this high-risk population. We evaluated an urban HBPC program's COVID-19 vaccination campaign to explore whether home-based vaccination can reduce inequity in vaccine administration or improve vaccine efforts. DesignWe conducted a cross-sectional study to examine characteristics of homebound patients who were vaccinated through an HBPC program or were vaccinated elsewhere. Setting and ParticipantsWe analyzed 795 patients enrolled in the HBPC program who were eligible for vaccination at home in 2021. MethodsWe collected vaccination data from patients, demographic data from the electronic medical record, and neighborhood-level characteristics for each patient based on census tract. ResultsHomebound patients vaccinated by HBPC were significantly more likely than homebound patients vaccinated outside of the program to have a history of dementia (P = .003), live in public housing (P < .001), have Medicaid (P = .005), be enrolled in HBPC for longer (P = .03), and live in neighborhoods with higher proportions of immigrants (P = .022), lower English proficiency (P = .007), lower computer usage (P = .001), and greater poverty (P < .001). Conclusion and ImplicationsHome-based vaccination campaigns may help lower-resourced patients get vaccinated by mitigating logistic barriers and using the influence of trusted patient-provider relationships established through HBPCs.

Prevalence of Independence at Home–Qualifying Beneficiaries in Traditional Medicare, 2014-2021

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center Independence at Home (IAH) demonstration, a test of home-based primary care operating in a value-based shared-savings payment model, ended December 2023 after a decade of consistently showing savings to Medicare. It is important to assess whether high-need, IAH-qualified beneficiaries continue to pose a growing challenge to traditional Medicare (TM) or if Medicare Advantage (MA), with programmatic features favorable to caring for this subset of the general Medicare population, can disproportionately provide such care. To examine the size and share of IAH-qualified beneficiaries in TM and MA. This cohort study used all Medicare claims data and MA encounter data for 2014 and 2021. IAH qualifying criteria were applied to the TM populations enrolled in Parts A and B in 2014 and 2021, and to MA enrollees in 2021. Growth in the number of IAH-qualified TM beneficiaries from 2014 to 2021 was calculated, and the proportions and numbers of IAH-qualified enrollees in the total 2021 TM and MA populations were compared. Data were analyzed between April and June 2023. The number and share of beneficiaries meeting IAH criteria in TM and MA; the share of TM spending among IAH-qualified beneficiaries. Among 64 million Medicare beneficiaries in 2021, there were 30.55 million beneficiaries in TM with Parts A and B coverage, down from 33.82 million in 2014. The number of IAH-qualified beneficiaries in TM grew 51%, from 2.16 million to 3.27 million, while their proportionate share in TM grew 67% from 6.4% to 10.7% of TM between 2014 and 2021. IAH-qualified beneficiaries represented $155 billion in 2021 Medicare Parts A and B spending, 44% of all TM spending, up from 29% of total spending in 2014. In 2021, 2.15 million IAH-qualified beneficiaries represented 8.0% of Medicare Advantage enrollees. Combining TM and MA, 5.42 million IAH-qualified beneficiaries represented 9.3% of all Medicare beneficiaries, with 3.27 million (60.3%) being insured by TM. In this cohort study of IAH-qualified Medicare beneficiaries, the share of IAH-qualified beneficiaries in TM grew between 2014 and 2021, with 60% of Medicare high-need beneficiaries accounting for 44% of TM spending. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should continue to operate value-based programs like IAH that are specifically designed for these high-needs individuals.

Building a National Standard for Outreach and Assistance to At-Risk Patients During Large-Scale Disasters

Health care institutions play an essential role in community resilience. As one of the largest health care systems in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) plays a critical role in supporting medically vulnerable Veterans during disasters. Disasters require large-scale outreach to individuals in affected areas, including the capability to identify patients, establish contact, determine needs, and deliver required services. Here we describe the development and implementation of VHA's Vulnerable Patient Care, Access, and Response in Emergencies (VP CARE) program, a data-driven system of outreach to preidentified medically vulnerable patients, which seeks to streamline this process. VP CARE was inspired by the VHA's Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) program and the US Department of Health and Human Services’ emPOWER program. It seeks to enhance Veteran patients' well-being and continuity of care during disasters using 3 components: (1) improving the readiness and resilience of vulnerable patients and their caregivers; (2) establishing an organization, policies, procedures, and competency-based training exercises to guide outreach and assistance; and (3) creating and implementing standardized 1- and 2-way outreach technology and reporting. Using Geographic Information Systems embedded in VP CARE, VHA can generate a list of high-risk patients and deploy a 2-way texting capability to contact and receive responses from them. VP CARE automatically tracks patient contact and responses, reducing duplication of effort and freeing up VA staff to focus on patients with immediate needs. Patients and their caregivers benefit from the reassurance of knowing that VHA is focused on their well-being and available to support them. The technologies deployed in VP CARE improve the efficiency of outreach efforts and reduce the risk of life-threatening harm, while reducing the cost and demands on VA staff. This article concludes with lessons learned that may be instructive for other health care systems seeking to establish similar outreach capabilities.

Home-based primary care providers' perspectives on the unique challenges of working with late life posttraumatic stress disorder within their population of Veterans.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is more prevalent in medically ill older Veterans in Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) settings than in the general population, raising unique considerations. The aim of this qualitative project was to explore HBPC mental health providers' perceptions of the presentation and treatment of PTSD and trauma-related symptoms in this population of older Veterans, many of whom face additional barriers to treatment due to living in rural settings. Five focus groups and one one-on-one interview were conducted with 23 HBPC mental health providers serving rural or rural/urban mixed communities across the United States. We applied qualitative content analysis to the data. Three themes were found: (1) Presentation of Trauma-Related Symptoms and PTSD in HBPC Population; (2) Treatment Challenges in HBPC; and (3) PTSD Treatment Strategies. Each theme had multiple subthemes which illustrate unique issues in this population. Results of this project contribute to key insights surrounding the unique presentation of PTSD and trauma-related processes and treatment considerations in a medically, cognitively, and psychosocially complex group of veterans. Efforts to improve access to care should consider the specific needs of veterans who are homebound, live in rural settings and identify with rural cultural norms, and have difficulty engaging in specialized PTSD treatment due to the convergence of these factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Evaluating feedback reports to support documentation of veterans’ care preferences in home based primary care

BackgroundTo evaluate the effectiveness of delivering feedback reports to increase completion of LST notes among VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) teams. The Life Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI) was implemented throughout the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in the United States in 2017 to ensure that seriously ill Veterans have care goals and LST decisions elicited and documented.MethodsWe distributed monthly feedback reports summarizing LST template completion rates to 13 HBPC intervention sites between October 2018 and February 2020 as the sole implementation strategy. We used principal component analyses to match intervention to 26 comparison sites and used interrupted time series/segmented regression analyses to evaluate the differences in LST template completion rates between intervention and comparison sites. Data were extracted from national databases for VA HBPC in addition to interviews and surveys in a mixed methods process evaluation.ResultsLST template completion rose from 6.3 to 41.9% across both intervention and comparison HBPC teams between March 1, 2018, and February 26, 2020. There were no statistically significant differences for intervention sites that received feedback reports.ConclusionsFeedback reports did not increase documentation of LST preferences for Veterans at intervention compared with comparison sites. Observed increases in completion rates across intervention and comparison sites can likely be attributed to implementation strategies used nationally as part of the national roll-out of the LSTDI. Our results suggest that feedback reports alone were not an effective implementation strategy to augment national implementation strategies in HBPC teams.

The Characteristics of Patients Using Home-Based Primary Care in Korea

The Characteristics of Patients Using Home-Based Primary Care in Korea

Patients Enrolled in Home-Based Primary Care: Expecting Advanced Frailty

Patients Enrolled in Home-Based Primary Care: Expecting Advanced Frailty

Community paramedicine in dementia care.

Novel hospital diversion strategies are needed to support a growing number of patients with dementia living in the community. One promising model is community paramedicine (CP), which deploys paramedics to the home, who consult with a physician to coordinate treatment and assess disposition. While evidence suggests CP can manage many patients without escalation to the emergency department (ED), no studies have evaluated optimal CP utilization for patients with dementia. Therefore, we compare the use and outcomes of CP for homebound patients with and without dementia. This retrospective cohort study examines 251 homebound patients receiving home-based primary care, who utilized a physician-led CP service between March 2017 and May 2022. Linked electronic health record data included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and CP encounter details. Dementia status and CP outcomes, including rates of ED transport, over-transport (i.e., transported, but not hospitalized), and under-transport (i.e., not transported, but ED visit within 3 days), were determined via chart review. Using logistic regression, we modeled the association of dementia status with over- and under-transport, adjusting for age, sex, and chief complaint. Fifty-three percent of CP patients had dementia. Their most common chief complaints were dyspnea (24.3%), altered mental status (17.9%), and generalized weakness (9.8%). We found no significant difference in ED transport rates by dementia status (25.4 vs. 22.8%, p = 0.54). Dementia diagnosis was associated with lower rates of over-transport (OR = 0.21, p = 0.03, CI [0.05, 0.85]) and comparable rates of under-transport (OR = 0.70, p = 0.47, CI [0.27, 1.83]) in adjusted models. CP has effectively managed a diverse population of homebound patients with dementia cared for via home-based primary care. Future work should examine potential cost savings and use of CP in dementia care across geographic and healthcare settings.

Characteristics of Homebound and Patients with Disability Who Use Home-Based Primary Care in Korea: A Retrospective Study for 2018-2022.

(1) Background and Methods: This study evaluated characteristics of South Korean patients necessitating home-based primary care (HBPC) from 2018 to 2022, distinguishing between homebound individuals with chronic conditions and those with registered disabilities. (2) Result: Among 171 HBPC recipients, 56.1% were homebound, predominantly older with a median age of 81 years (interquartile range (IQR 68.5-86.0)), while 43.9% were disabled, generally younger with a median age of 39 years (IQR, 28-64). Activities of daily living were assessed, revealing a median score of 14 (IQR, 10-19), indicative of high care dependency. The most common conditions among homebound patients were dementia (27.1%) and physical mobility difficulties (21.9%), whereas mental disabilities (53.3%) and mobility issues (36.0%) prevailed in disabled patients. The primary HBPC needs for homebound patients included management of acute medical conditions (27.1%) and sores (17.7%). Conversely, regular health check-ups (46.7%) and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms (26.7%) were prevalent among the disabled group. (3) Conclusion: Notably, over 90% of HBPC patients required assistance with daily activities, highlighting significant differences in the needs and characteristics between older, homebound individuals with multiple comorbidities and younger, disabled patients receiving medical aid. These insights emphasize the necessity to develop customized HBPC programs to adequately cater to the diverse patient needs within South Korea.

Caring for caregivers and persons living with dementia under home-based primary care: protocol for an interventional clinical trial

BackgroundApproximately 7.5 million older adults are homebound, who have difficulty and/or need assistance to leave their homes. In this growing population, the prevalence of people living with dementia (PLWD) is approximately 50%. Current dementia care models in the USA were developed for traditional office-based primary care and have not been tailored to home-based primary care (HBPC) delivery models. Literature has shown that office-based collaborative interventions can improve caregiver outcomes including caregiver stress, well-being, and morbidity and patient outcomes including improved quality of life and reduced emergency department visits (Possin KL, Merrilees JJ, Dulaney S, Bonasera SJ, Chiong W, Lee K, JAMA Int Med 179:1658, 2019). To date, the evidence for HBPC dementia interventions is lacking. Though HBPC has demonstrated benefit in homebound older adults, there is limited literature on the effects of HBPC on persons living with dementia (Nguyen HQ, Vallejo JD, Macias M, Shiffman MG, Rosen R, Mowry V, J Am Geriatr Soc 70:1136–46, 2021). Our goal is to develop a HBPC-focused dementia care intervention that integrates the components of two previously developed dementia care models and test the feasibility of implementing it in HBPC practices to improve the quality of life and wellbeing of homebound PLWD and their caregivers.MethodsWe will first conduct qualitative focus groups at two HBPC practice sites, one in the Southeast and one in Hawaii in order to obtain preliminary feedback on the proposed intervention. At each site, there will be one focus group with caregivers of PLWD and another with HBPC clinicians and staff to help develop and refine our intervention. We will then conduct an open-pilot trial of the refined intervention at the two HBPC practices. A total of up to 25 patient/caregiver dyads will be recruited at each site (N = 50 total). Outcomes measured through pre-and-post assessments and exit interviews will include (a) feasibility for the caregiver to engage with and complete baseline assessments and access educational materials and community resources and (b) feasibility for the practice to identify potential caregivers/patients, assess eligible patient/caregiver dyads, use patient and caregiver assessments, recruit patient/caregiver dyads, recruit racial and ethnic minorities, use care modules, and engage with the tele-video case conference, (c) net promoter score, (d) acceptability of the intervention to caregivers and patients to participate in the intervention, (e) caregivers feeling heard and understood, and (f) caregiver well-being.DiscussionTesting the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted intervention in these two HBPC practices will provide the basis for future testing and evaluation of a fully powered intervention for PLWD and their caregivers cared for in HBPC with the goal of disseminating high-quality and comprehensive dementia-care focused interventions into HBPC practices.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05849259 in May 2023.

"It shouldn't be like this": Family caregivers navigating insurance for family members with dementia.

Almost 11.3 million family caregivers of people with dementia must navigate the health insurance landscape to meet the complex medical and long-term care needs of their family members. This study explores factors that influence family caregivers' decisions about insurance and how these choices affect the care and support people with dementia receive. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from June 2022 to January 2023 with 15 family caregivers of people with dementia dual eligible for Medicaid and Medicare and enrolled in home-based primary care in New York City. A set of open-ended questions were asked exploring caregivers' perspectives on navigating insurance plans. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis with both deductive and inductive coding. Analysis revealed three major themes: (1) challenges of Medicaid enrollment, (2) making do with existing insurance, and (3) mistrust of the insurance system. Initial enrollment in Medicaid compounded the stress of adjusting to caregiving. The enrollment process was impacted by clinical factors, financial factors, and input from providers and social workers; however, caregivers could not identify a centralized system for obtaining insurance information and support. Once Medicaid was in place, participants described advocating on behalf of their family member within the constraints of their current insurance plans (Medicare and Medicaid) and ensuring they had the necessary knowledge to understand their family member's coverage. Participants voiced a need for ongoing vigilance to ensure their family members received needed care and support. The challenges family caregivers experience when navigating insurance for their family members with dementia contribute to caregiver burden. Robust and centralized professional support for family members both immediately after a family member's dementia diagnosis and as the disease progresses could increase caregivers' capacity to make insurance decisions that best support their family members with dementia.

Diagnostic uncertainty and decision-making in home-based primary care: A qualitative study of antibiotic prescribing.

Evaluating infection in home-based primary care is challenging, and these challenges may impact antibiotic prescribing. A refined understanding of antibiotic decision-making in this setting can inform strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship. This study investigated antibiotic decision-making by exploring the perspectives of clinicians in home-based primary care. Clinicians from the Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Program were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from June 2022 through September 2022 using a discussion guide. Transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory. The constant comparative method was used to develop a coding structure and to identify themes. Theoretical saturation was reached after 22 clinicians (physicians, n = 7; physician assistants, n = 2, advanced practice registered nurses, n = 13) from 19 programs were interviewed. Mean age was 48.5 ± 9.3 years, 91% were female, and 59% had ≥6 years of experience in home-based primary care. Participants reported uncertainty about the diagnosis of infection due to the characteristics of homebound patients (atypical presentations of disease, presence of multiple chronic conditions, presence of cognitive impairment) and the challenges of delivering medical care in the home (limited access to diagnostic testing, suboptimal quality of microbiological specimens, barriers to establishing remote access to the electronic health record). When faced with diagnostic uncertainty about infection, participants described many factors that influenced the decision to prescribe antibiotics, including those that promoted prescribing (desire to avoid hospitalization, pressure from caregivers, unreliable plans for follow-up) and those that inhibited prescribing (perceptions of antibiotic-associated harms, willingness to trial non-pharmacological interventions first, presence of caregivers who were trusted by clinicians to monitor symptoms). Clinicians face the difficult task of balancing diagnostic uncertainty with many competing considerations during the treatment of infection in home-based primary care. Recognizing these issues provides insight into strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship in home care settings.

Adapting Measurement-Based Care to VA Home-Based Primary Care Mental Health Treatment: A Quality Improvement Project

ABSTRACT Objectives This quality improvement project sought to develop guidance for Home-Based Primary Care (HPBC) Mental Health (MH) clinicians on integrating Measurement-Based Care (MBC) into their practice and gain participating psychologists’ feedback on their experience using MBC for treating mental health concerns with HBPC Veterans. Methods Based on feedback from the HBPC MH community and in consultation with national leadership, a workgroup of HBPC psychologists developed a guide tailoring MBC to HBPC Veterans. Eight HBPC psychologists piloted the adapted MBC approach with 53 Veterans. Participating psychologists provided feedback on measure administration, Veterans’ responses to MBC, and perceived benefits and challenges. Results Pilot participants’ feedback suggested that MBC can be a highly useful tool for delivering mental health services in HBPC, although feedback varied about specific MBC measures. Qualitative feedback was primarily positive, but participants noted challenges based on the nature of the presenting problem and Veteran-specific characteristics. Conclusions Findings indicate that MBC can be utilized with appropriate HBPC Veterans and has the potential to benefit care. Further research is needed to clarify factors that enhance or reduce MBC’s utility within HBPC. Clinical Implications HBPC MH providers identified MBC as a useful tool particularly when adapted to meet the needs of HBPC Veterans.

The Effect of Integrated Care After Discharge From Hospitals on Outcomes Among Korean Older Adults

Background: The Korean government implemented a pilot project for integrated care of older adults in August 2019. the pilot project of integrated care provided housekeeping support, nutrition support, movement assistance, home repair, consultations and education for healthy lifestyle, and some home-based primary care to older patients discharged from hospitals. This study investigated the outcomes of this project among older adults who participated in it after discharge from the hospital. Methods: This study combined the data from the pilot project survey with that from the National Health Insurance Service. The participants comprised 1,895 older adults who participated in the pilot project between August 01, 2019 and April 30, 2022. For comparison, 7,145 older adults who lived in regions where no pilot project were selected as the matched group using propensity score matching. The length of home stay, total expenses of national health insurance and long-term care insurance, emergency visits, and hospital readmission for the same disease were measured, till July 31, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed through difference-in-differences analysis using a generalized estimating equation and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The results indicated an increase of 35.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.7, 39.8) in length of home stay over an average observation period of 550.5 days and a reduction of 6,960 USD (95% CI: -7,924, -5,996) in total expenses for participants compared to the controls. The odds ratio of emergency visits of the pilot project participants was 0.56 (95% CI 0.48, 0.65) compared with the controls. The hazard ratio for hospital readmission for the same disease after hospital discharge was 3.53 (95% CI 2.98, 4.19) times higher in project participants than that in the controls. Conclusion: The pilot project for integrated care has resulted in an increased length of home stay and hospital readmission and reduced total expenses and emergency visits among older patients discharged from hospitals. The integrated care after discharge from hospitals can help older adults to continue living in the place where they lived, and improved collaboration between clinics and hospitals is required to prevent readmissions.

Applying a trauma-informed approach to home visits.

The concept of trauma and traumatic stress and its impact on health and mental health has been studied for nearly half a century. Trauma-informed care (TIC) is person-centered care designed and delivered based on knowledge of the ubiquity of trauma. It requires building an understanding of the role that trauma plays in the lives and health outcomes of survivors. In doing so, it helps promote physical, psychological, and emotional safety for both clinicians and patients. Trauma and traumatic events are cumulative over the lifespan, and individuals who have experienced trauma are at higher risk for re-traumatization and poorer health outcomes. TIC approaches have been applied in many healthcare settings successfully; however, to date, there have not been any recommendations made about applying these approaches to care of homebound older adults, even though it may be surmised that this population is at an especially high risk for prior trauma and entering a person's safe space could be especially sensitive for trauma survivors. This paper serves to provide specific recommendations for applying a trauma-informed approach to a home visit and provides recommendations to home-based primary care groups and health systems about implementing universal trauma-informed care to homebound older adults.

Home medical care and Home health care system and roles of the public health care in Korea

In the face of rapid aging in Korea, the demand for appropriate medical services for the elderly at home is increasing. This study investigates the current status of home medical care and Home health care in Korea based on the concept of Home-based primary care, and proposes strategies to implement home-care in public health centers and public hospitals that play a major role in the field of public health care.First of all, by presenting a conceptual framework for the current status of Korea’s home medical care and Home health care provision system, and described according to three financial resources: National Health Insurance(NHI), Long-Term Care Insurance(LTCI), and public health care. At the current level, the home health care systems are fragmented and they should be redesigned to improve the home care services.In order to implement home care in public health care institutions, a model centered on public health centers and public hospitals is proposed. Public health centers have various advantages, responsibility positions, and access to information, but they have working conditions and difficulties in providing incentives, and medical and nursing limitations. Public hospitals can provide a variety of services, but community access and insufficient knowledge are pointed out as disadvantages. Therefore, it is important to establish a cooperative system between the two institutions.Finally, we proposes the division and cooperation between public health centers and private medical institutions according to the level of service. Private medical institutions could be in charge of active treatment, medical services and skilled nursing cares. public health centers could perform monitoring and follow-up the patients. it is necessary to establish a coordinating system to cooperate the two parts of institutions.