Home-Based Primary Care Program Research Articles

Defining and Validating Criteria to Identify Populations Who May Benefit From Home-Based Primary Care.

Home-based primary care (HBPC) is an important care delivery model for high-need older adults. Currently, target patient populations vary across HBPC programs, hindering expansion and large-scale evaluation. Develop and validate criteria that identify appropriate HBPC target populations. A modified Delphi process was used to achieve expert consensus on criteria for identifying HBPC target populations. All criteria were defined and validated using linked data from Medicare claims and the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) (cohort n=21,727). Construct validation involved assessing demographics and health outcomes/expenditures for selected criteria. Delphi panelists (n=29) represented diverse professional perspectives. Criteria were validated on community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (age above 70) enrolled in NHATS. Criteria were selected via Delphi questionnaires. For construct validation, sociodemographic characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries were self-reported in NHATS, and annual health care expenditures and mortality were obtained via linked Medicare claims. Panelists proposed an algorithm of criteria for HBPC target populations that included indicators for serious illness, functional impairment, and social isolation. The algorithm's Delphi-selected criteria applied to 16.8% of Medicare beneficiaries. These HBPC target populations had higher annual health care costs [Med (IQR): $10,851 (3316, 31,556) vs. $2830 (913, 9574)] and higher 12-month mortality [15% (95% CI: 14, 17) vs. 5% (95% CI: 4, 5)] compared with the total validation cohort. We developed and validated an algorithm to define target populations for HBPC, which suggests a need for increased HBPC availability. By enabling objective identification of unmet demands for HBPC access or resources, this algorithm can foster robust evaluation and equitable expansion of HBPC.

Characteristics Associated With Homebound Vaccination Against COVID-19

ObjectivesHomebound patients are older and suffer from multiple comorbidities, and many experienced difficulties getting vaccinated because of their inability to routinely leave the home due to health and function. Home-based primary care (HBPC) programs offer vaccination at home to reach this high-risk population. We evaluated an urban HBPC program's COVID-19 vaccination campaign to explore whether home-based vaccination can reduce inequity in vaccine administration or improve vaccine efforts. DesignWe conducted a cross-sectional study to examine characteristics of homebound patients who were vaccinated through an HBPC program or were vaccinated elsewhere. Setting and ParticipantsWe analyzed 795 patients enrolled in the HBPC program who were eligible for vaccination at home in 2021. MethodsWe collected vaccination data from patients, demographic data from the electronic medical record, and neighborhood-level characteristics for each patient based on census tract. ResultsHomebound patients vaccinated by HBPC were significantly more likely than homebound patients vaccinated outside of the program to have a history of dementia (P = .003), live in public housing (P < .001), have Medicaid (P = .005), be enrolled in HBPC for longer (P = .03), and live in neighborhoods with higher proportions of immigrants (P = .022), lower English proficiency (P = .007), lower computer usage (P = .001), and greater poverty (P < .001). Conclusion and ImplicationsHome-based vaccination campaigns may help lower-resourced patients get vaccinated by mitigating logistic barriers and using the influence of trusted patient-provider relationships established through HBPCs.

Building a National Standard for Outreach and Assistance to At-Risk Patients During Large-Scale Disasters

Health care institutions play an essential role in community resilience. As one of the largest health care systems in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) plays a critical role in supporting medically vulnerable Veterans during disasters. Disasters require large-scale outreach to individuals in affected areas, including the capability to identify patients, establish contact, determine needs, and deliver required services. Here we describe the development and implementation of VHA's Vulnerable Patient Care, Access, and Response in Emergencies (VP CARE) program, a data-driven system of outreach to preidentified medically vulnerable patients, which seeks to streamline this process. VP CARE was inspired by the VHA's Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) program and the US Department of Health and Human Services’ emPOWER program. It seeks to enhance Veteran patients' well-being and continuity of care during disasters using 3 components: (1) improving the readiness and resilience of vulnerable patients and their caregivers; (2) establishing an organization, policies, procedures, and competency-based training exercises to guide outreach and assistance; and (3) creating and implementing standardized 1- and 2-way outreach technology and reporting. Using Geographic Information Systems embedded in VP CARE, VHA can generate a list of high-risk patients and deploy a 2-way texting capability to contact and receive responses from them. VP CARE automatically tracks patient contact and responses, reducing duplication of effort and freeing up VA staff to focus on patients with immediate needs. Patients and their caregivers benefit from the reassurance of knowing that VHA is focused on their well-being and available to support them. The technologies deployed in VP CARE improve the efficiency of outreach efforts and reduce the risk of life-threatening harm, while reducing the cost and demands on VA staff. This article concludes with lessons learned that may be instructive for other health care systems seeking to establish similar outreach capabilities.

Characteristics of Homebound and Patients with Disability Who Use Home-Based Primary Care in Korea: A Retrospective Study for 2018-2022.

(1) Background and Methods: This study evaluated characteristics of South Korean patients necessitating home-based primary care (HBPC) from 2018 to 2022, distinguishing between homebound individuals with chronic conditions and those with registered disabilities. (2) Result: Among 171 HBPC recipients, 56.1% were homebound, predominantly older with a median age of 81 years (interquartile range (IQR 68.5-86.0)), while 43.9% were disabled, generally younger with a median age of 39 years (IQR, 28-64). Activities of daily living were assessed, revealing a median score of 14 (IQR, 10-19), indicative of high care dependency. The most common conditions among homebound patients were dementia (27.1%) and physical mobility difficulties (21.9%), whereas mental disabilities (53.3%) and mobility issues (36.0%) prevailed in disabled patients. The primary HBPC needs for homebound patients included management of acute medical conditions (27.1%) and sores (17.7%). Conversely, regular health check-ups (46.7%) and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms (26.7%) were prevalent among the disabled group. (3) Conclusion: Notably, over 90% of HBPC patients required assistance with daily activities, highlighting significant differences in the needs and characteristics between older, homebound individuals with multiple comorbidities and younger, disabled patients receiving medical aid. These insights emphasize the necessity to develop customized HBPC programs to adequately cater to the diverse patient needs within South Korea.

Diagnostic uncertainty and decision-making in home-based primary care: A qualitative study of antibiotic prescribing.

Evaluating infection in home-based primary care is challenging, and these challenges may impact antibiotic prescribing. A refined understanding of antibiotic decision-making in this setting can inform strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship. This study investigated antibiotic decision-making by exploring the perspectives of clinicians in home-based primary care. Clinicians from the Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Program were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from June 2022 through September 2022 using a discussion guide. Transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory. The constant comparative method was used to develop a coding structure and to identify themes. Theoretical saturation was reached after 22 clinicians (physicians, n = 7; physician assistants, n = 2, advanced practice registered nurses, n = 13) from 19 programs were interviewed. Mean age was 48.5 ± 9.3 years, 91% were female, and 59% had ≥6 years of experience in home-based primary care. Participants reported uncertainty about the diagnosis of infection due to the characteristics of homebound patients (atypical presentations of disease, presence of multiple chronic conditions, presence of cognitive impairment) and the challenges of delivering medical care in the home (limited access to diagnostic testing, suboptimal quality of microbiological specimens, barriers to establishing remote access to the electronic health record). When faced with diagnostic uncertainty about infection, participants described many factors that influenced the decision to prescribe antibiotics, including those that promoted prescribing (desire to avoid hospitalization, pressure from caregivers, unreliable plans for follow-up) and those that inhibited prescribing (perceptions of antibiotic-associated harms, willingness to trial non-pharmacological interventions first, presence of caregivers who were trusted by clinicians to monitor symptoms). Clinicians face the difficult task of balancing diagnostic uncertainty with many competing considerations during the treatment of infection in home-based primary care. Recognizing these issues provides insight into strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship in home care settings.

Home-based primary care-mental health integration in the Veterans Health Administration: An updated evaluation of practice patterns.

Starting in 2008, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration required the integration of mental health providers (MH providers) in Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs to promote access to and quality of mental health services for veterans enrolled in HBPC. Surveys were administered in both 2010 and 2019 to HBPC program directors and MH providers to evaluate the status of mental health practice in HBPC programs and inform the continued development of program resources. Findings reported here summarize responses to the 2019 survey and highlight changes compared to 2010 in key areas (e.g., mental health staffing and workload, services provided, training needs, and integration with and impact on the HBPC team). In 2019, approximately half of invited HBPC program directors (n = 66) and MH providers (n = 136) completed the voluntary, anonymous, and confidential surveys. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of quantitative data, and thematic analyses of open-text responses, were conducted. Comparisons of survey responses were made between the 2019 surveys and those collected in 2010 from MH providers (n = 132) and program directors (n = 112), and indicated similar patterns of variability in program staffing and practices across sites, with ongoing behavioral/mental health education and training needs reported for both MH providers and teams. The perceived degree and value of mental health integration in HBPC also remained high. Survey responses suggest integration of mental health services into HBPC continues to be feasible and improves access to key services. Findings may inform the expansion of home-based mental health services for meeting the needs of an aging population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Implementation of patient priorities-aligned care in a home-based primary care program

BackgroundOlder adults may be limited in their ability to access care that meets their health goals owing to disease burden, financial instability, and psychosocial barriers. A home-based primary care (HBPC) program established in 2020 within a large family medicine practice uses the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach to identify and address patients’ health priorities. When incorporated as part of the HBPC model of care, the PPC approach has the potential to enhance person-centered care for older adults in a way that best supports their health goals. ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to summarize common recommendations for alignment of care with patients’ health outcome goals after implementation of the PPC approach in an HBPC population. MethodsThis retrospective study was exempt from review by an institutional review board. After enrollment in the HBPC program, patients participated in a PPC priorities identification conversation to identify their health outcome goals and care preferences. Through chart review, 2 researchers independently categorized these goals based on the set of values they most reflect: connecting, managing health, enjoying life, and functioning. Aspects of care in place before enrollment in HBPC were considered to determine any adjustments that needed to be made to align care with patients’ identified priorities. ResultsThe most common value associated with patients’ most desired health outcome goal was functioning (n = 33, 66%). For secondary and tertiary health outcome goals, the most common value identified was managing health (secondary, n = 28, 56%; tertiary, n = 22, 44%). Common recommendations made to align care with patients’ identified priorities included stopping potentially harmful medications, starting medications for untreated conditions, starting physical or occupational therapy, and adjusting medications. ConclusionThrough the PPC approach, patients’ values were identified and care was assessed to aid in attainment of individualized health outcome goals and tailor care to What Matters most.

Randomized controlled trial of tailored audit with feedback in VHA long-term care settings

BackgroundThe Long-Term Care QUERI program supported implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative in US Veterans Health Administration long-term care settings. The program worked with eleven Community Living Centers (CLCs) and twelve Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs to increase rates of completed templates, using audit with feedback. We distributed monthly feedback reports to site champions showing the number of Veterans with appropriate documentation. Although feedback reports are a common implementation tool, little is known about the most effective ways to design, distribute, and support them. We sought to test tailoring reports with tips using site-specific data, as well as national comparator data.MethodsWe conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial of monthly feedback reports utilizing site-tailored tips and national comparator data compared to our original feedback reports that included only graphical and numerical data. CLC and HBPC team members were invited to participate in brief surveys each quarter to determine if they had received and used the feedback reports. The outcome for CLC residents was the percent with a completed LST template any time prior to the 14th day of their stay. The outcome for HBPC residents was the percent of Veterans with a completed LST template by their second HBPC visit.ResultsThe response rate to the survey ranged between 6.8 and 19.3% of staff members across the CLC and HBPC sites with 12.8–25.5% of survey respondents reporting that they had seen the feedback reports. The linear regression models showed no significant association between receiving the enhanced feedback reports and having a higher documentation completion rate.ConclusionsReceiving feedback reports tailored to sites by including tips based on baseline context assessments and qualitative findings, and reports showing national comparator data, did not have an impact on the number of Veterans with a completed LST template. Having a higher proportion of CLC or HBPC team members view the reports was not associated with an increase in LST template completion. These findings suggest that tailored audit with feedback may not have been effective at the program level, although the proportion of respondents who reported seeing the reports was small.

Addressing Healthcare Utilization and Costs for Older Adults with Limited Mobility Through a Multidisciplinary Home-Based Primary Care Program.

Home-based primary care (HBPC) has shown promise in the management of multiple chronic conditions for patients who are homebound or who have limited mobility. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate an HBPC program that integrates the services of clinical pharmacists and community aging services providers in a community-based setting. Mountain Area Health Education Center's (MAHEC) HBPC program brought together an interdisciplinary team including medical providers, pharmacists, and community aging services providers to conduct home visits with older adults (age 50+). A single-arm, prepost analysis was conducted to determine differences from the year before program enrollment to the year postenrollment. We examined the frequency of health care visits, high-cost health care utilization (emergency department [ED] utilization and hospitalizations), and health care costs. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population and outcomes. Fisher's Exact Tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference between years. There were 130 home visits with 62 patients enrolled in the program. The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) was completed for 32 (51.6%) patients. There were 13 (21.0%) and 12 (19.4%) individuals who had at least 1 ED visit and hospitalization, respectively, pre-enrollment as compared with 8 (12.9%) and 9 (14.5%) individuals postenrollment (p-value = 0.05, p-value = 0.06). During the postenrollment year, patient enrollees had an average per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost of $1567.96 as compared with $3053.21 in the year prior. Pharmacist and community agency services-integrated HBPC was implemented in the community setting. There was a decrease in high-cost health care utilization and total health care expenditures for patients as compared with the previous year.

Caregiver Experiences Participating in a Home-Based Primary Care Program: A Pragmatic Evaluation Including Qualitative Interviews and Quantitative Surveys.

The aim of this evaluation was to assess caregiver experience and burden during their first year in a geriatric home-based primary care (HBPC) program with qualitative interviews and surveys. HBPC included in-home visits for homebound, older adult patients. Seventeen caregivers, with varied amount of experience with HBPC, participated in semi-structured interviews. Change in caregiver burden from baseline was captured for 44 caregivers at 3months post-enrollment, 27 caregivers at 6months, and 22 caregivers at 12months. Satisfaction survey was administered at these timepoints, but the last response of 48 caregivers was analyzed. Caregiver interviews revealed three themes: caregiving stressors, reliance on HBPC in relation to other medical care, and healthcare in the home. Surveyed caregivers were highly satisfied, but burden did not change substantially over the 1year intervention. Caregivers appreciated HBPC reduced patient transportation and provided satisfactory primary care, but additional research is needed to tailor this care to reduce caregiver burden.

Managing Social Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from US Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Veterans and Caregivers

The COVID-19 pandemic proved especially devastating for older adults who are primarily homebound, as well as their caregivers. The objective of this study was to describe how United States (US) Veterans—and their caregivers—who receive care from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) program managed increased social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We designed a qualitative study and conducted phone interviews with Veterans and their caregivers receiving VA HBPC care, interviewing N = 44 Veterans and caregivers from eight VA HBPC programs across the US. We audio recorded and transcribed all interview data and applied an inductive and deductive approach to thematic analysis to analysis. The following themes emerged illustrating how Veterans and caregivers managed increased isolation during the pandemic: 1) normalizing challenges; 2) caregivers struggling to manage isolation, as Veterans were accustomed to being homebound; 3) relying heavily on social support of family and/or friends and neighbors, and engaging in creative activities; and 4) those living in their own homes found increased isolation more manageable than those living in assisted living facilities. Results show HBPC Veterans & their caregivers with stronger social networks drew upon previously curated social capital to manage isolation and took a “we’re all in this together” attitude toward the pandemic. Results can inform community programs, healthcare systems, and policy makers to target efforts when creating supportive programs and policies for older adults and caregivers, especially those with smaller social support networks and those living in assisted living facilities.

If You Give Them Away, It Still May Not Work: Challenges to Video Telehealth Device Use Among the Urban Homebound.

The growing homebound population may particularly benefit from video telehealth. However, some patients do not have the ability or resources to successfully use this modality. This report presents the experience of a large urban home-based primary care program disseminating cellular-enabled tablets with basic instruction to a subset of its patients who would not otherwise have had the ability to engage in video telehealth. Program goals included: increasing the number of patients able to engage in video encounters and leveraging technology to help achieve greater equity. While 123 homebound patients received devices for telehealth, only one-third successfully utilized them. We identified multiple barriers to telehealth utilization beyond physical access to a device, including a lack of skill. Efforts to increase video encounters among patient groups who are less experienced with technology cannot simply rely on device provision or basic instruction but must include reinforced learning strategies combined with ongoing technical assistance.

“It Isn't the Same”: Experiences of Informal Caregivers of Older Adults Enrolled in a Home-Based Senior Care Program During COVID-19

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed new strains on informal caregivers, who are already vulnerable to negative psychosocial effects due to demands of the caregiving role. The current study aimed to explore the early impact of COVID-19 on caregivers living with and apart from care recipients. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with seven cohabitating and 10 distanced caregivers of patients in a home-based primary care program were conducted from April to November 2020. A framework matrix was used to identify patterns in caregiver experiences. Cohabitating and distanced caregivers reported shared concerns about COVID-19 and unique concerns dependent on cohabitation status. Cohabitating caregivers reported financial worries, care recipients with dementia being unable to understand restrictions, and concerns about community business changes. Distanced caregivers reported communication challenges with cognitively impaired care recipients and challenges with visitation policies. During pandemics, caregivers' clinical and policy support needs may differ depending on their place of residence relative to care recipients. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(3), 19-26.].

Responding to "Pharmacist Identification of Older Patients' Priorities in a Home-Based Primary Care Program".

Dr. Kristina M. Niehoff writes to the editor about Dr. Krishnamurthy and colleagues' article on their groundbreaking efforts to showcase the expansive and impactful role a pharmacist can have on patient care in the home setting.

EXPANDING HOME-BASED PRIMARY CARE FOR MEDICALLY COMPLEX PATIENTS: RUSH@HOME

Abstract Medically complex older adults from underserved communities experience multiple barriers to obtaining necessary health care and services. Often these individuals are largely unable to leave their homes due to a lack of community resources facilitating travel to and from provider appointments. Rush@Home is a home-based primary care program that focuses on the 4Ms by incorporating patient navigation and social work services for medically complex older adults. The majority of the patients enrolled in the Rush@Home program identify as Black and/or Latino (&amp;gt;50%) and reside on the West Side of Chicago which is historically underserved in terms of health care access. To date, Rush@Home has enrolled n=234 participants with n=176 patients who are currently active in the program. Among participants there less than a 10% readmission rate and an ED visit rate of approximately 5%. This presentation will discuss the Rush@Home data and the importance of community engagement.

IMPACT OF RECEIVING HOME-BASED PRIMARY CARE FOR PERSONS LIVING WITH DEMENTIA: PATIENT AND CAREGIVER PERSPECTIVES

Abstract Homebound persons living with dementia (PWD) require healthcare services that proliferate with physical and cognitive changes over time. PWD often experience fragmented care that results in poor health outcomes and delayed healthcare access. The objective of the Virginia at Home Program (VaH), a recently initiated home-based primary care (HBPC) program, is to promote long-term sustainability and proliferation of HBPC. The study purpose was to examine the impact of VaH on the overall care and outcomes of homebound PWD and their families. We used quantitative and qualitative methods to describe the impact of VaH on patient care and outcomes over six months. We compared clinical outcomes (e.g., activities of daily living, frailty, behavioral symptoms) at baseline and six months using paired t-tests. We also conducted semi-structured phone interviews at baseline and six months with PWD-caregiver dyads. Thirty PWD-caregiver dyads enrolled. Of the 17 dyads that completed both visits, PWD’s physical function and caregiver’s burden decreased significantly over time (ps &amp;lt; .05). There was a significant improvement in PWD’s behavioral symptoms over the six-month period (p=.03). Three preliminary themes emerged from qualitative data: 1) participants established trusting relationships with the VaH team, 2) VaH supported caregivers in their caregiving responsibilities, and 3) participants met their pre-program goals through increased healthcare access. Findings suggest that the HBPC intervention improved care satisfaction and healthcare access and alleviated caregiver burden. Future studies should consider introducing HBPC programs in this hard-to-reach population to decrease acute care utilization and health care costs while improving care satisfaction and quality.

Disruptions in Home Hospice Care due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: There is limited evidence regarding the challenges of providing hospice care to those dying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To describe the challenges of home hospice care and the specific types of disruptions in care processes experienced by patients and families. Design: Qualitative study of the electronic medical record notes of a large New York City (NYC) home-based primary care program. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were 58 patients referred to hospice who died during the initial NYC COVID-19 surge from March to June 2020. Results: We identified six domains of disruptions in home hospice care: delayed hospice enrollment, inability to conduct home visits, lack of needed supplies, communication failures, strained caregivers, and limitations of telehealth. Conclusions: This study provides a critical first analysis of disruptions in home hospice care that can feasibly be addressed and must be prioritized by hospices throughout the ongoing pandemic and in advance of future emergencies.

Applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework to inform implementation of the Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through enhanced decision-making program in the United States Veterans Health Administration.

In 2017, the National Center for Ethics in Health Care for the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) commenced national roll-out of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative. This national VA initiative aimed to promote personalized, proactive, patient-driven care for seriously ill Veterans by documenting Veterans' goals and preferences for life-sustaining treatments in a durable electronic health record note template known as the life-sustaining treatment template. The Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED) quality improvement program was created to address the high variation in life-sustaining treatment template completion in VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) and Community Nursing Home programs. This manuscript describes the program that focuses on improving life sustaining treatment template completion rates amongst HBPC programs. To increase life-sustaining treatment template completion for Veterans receiving care from HBPC programs, the PERSIVED team applies two implementation strategies: audit with feedback and implementation facilitation. The PERSIVED team conducts semi-structured interviews, needs assessments, and process mapping with HBPC programs in order to identify barriers and facilitators to life-sustaining treatment template completion to inform tailored facilitation. Our interview data is analyzed using the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework, which identifies 57 determinants that might influence practice or implementation of interventions. To quickly synthesize and use baseline data to inform the tailored implementation plan, we adapted a rapid analysis process for our purposes. This paper describes a six-step process for conducting and analyzing baseline interviews through applying the TICD that can be applied and adapted by implementation scientists to rapidly inform tailoring of implementation facilitation.

Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED): a protocol for an implementation study in the Veterans Health Administration

BackgroundEmpirical evidence supports the use of structured goals of care conversations and documentation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) preferences in durable, accessible, and actionable orders to improve the care for people living with serious illness. As the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) provides an excellent environment to test implementation strategies that promote this evidence-based practice. The Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED) program seeks to improve care outcomes for seriously ill Veterans by supporting efforts to conduct goals of care conversations, systematically document LST preferences, and ensure timely and accurate communication about preferences across VA and non-VA settings.MethodsPERSIVED encompasses two separate but related implementation projects that support the same evidence-based practice. Project 1 will enroll 12 VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs and Project 2 will enroll six VA Community Nursing Home (CNH) programs. Both projects begin with a pre-implementation phase during which data from diverse stakeholders are gathered to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of the LST evidence-based practice. This baseline assessment is used to tailor quality improvement activities using audit with feedback and implementation facilitation during the implementation phase. Site champions serve as the lynchpin between the PERSIVED project team and site personnel. PERSIVED teams support site champions through monthly coaching sessions. At the end of implementation, baseline site process maps are updated to reflect new steps and procedures to ensure timely conversations and documentation of treatment preferences. During the sustainability phase, intense engagement with champions ends, at which point champions work independently to maintain and improve processes and outcomes. Ongoing process evaluation, guided by the RE-AIM framework, is used to monitor Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance outcomes. Effectiveness will be assessed using several endorsed clinical metrics for seriously ill populations.DiscussionThe PERSIVED program aims to prevent potentially burdensome LSTs by consistently eliciting and documenting values, goals, and treatment preferences of seriously ill Veterans. Working with clinical operational partners, we will apply our findings to HBPC and CNH programs throughout the national VA healthcare system during a future scale-out period.

Home-based primary care visits by nurse practitioners.

With rapidly growing numbers of homebound older adults, the need for effective home-based health interventions is increasingly recognized. Advanced practice registered nurses (NPs) are one of the most common providers of home-based primary care. Limited information is available to address the scope and nature of NP-led home-based primary care and associated outcomes. To synthesize research evidence of NP visits in home-based primary care. Six electronic databases-PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus-were searched to identify peer-reviewed research articles addressing home-based primary care interventions led by NPs. Independent screening resulted in 17 relevant articles from 14 unique studies to include in the review. Nurse practitioners provided health assessments, education, care planning and coordination primarily by face-to-face home visits. Despite a variability in terms of study design, setting, and sample, NP-led home-based primary care was in general associated with less hospitalization and fewer emergency department visits. Evidence was mixed in relation to patient-reported outcomes such as subjective health, functional status, and symptoms. Costs and patient or caregiver satisfaction were additional outcomes addressed, but the findings were inconsistent. Recent policy changes to authorize NPs to independently assess, diagnose, and order home care services directly affect how NPs approach home-based primary care programs. Our findings support NP-led home-based primary care to decrease consequential health utilization and suggest the need for further evaluating the care models in diverse populations with more patient-reported and caregiver outcomes.